In his new memoir Hitch-22, the public intellectual Christopher Hitchens writes that he now drinks ‘relatively carefully’.  By that, he means only a glass of scotch and half a bottle of wine at lunch, followed by the same at dinner and occasionally a nightcap.

How does one even smoke in the shower? Illustration: Tom Jellet

Hitchens’ drinking is the stuff of legend.  In fact, according to family folklore, his first fully-formed sentence was ‘Let’s all go and have a drink at the club.’ 

A 2006 profile in The New Yorker (which among other things notes that ‘Hitchens only recently gave up smoking in the shower’) describes Hitchens as ‘drinking like a Hemingway character: continually and to no apparent effect.’

I pass no judgment on Hitchens’ drinking other than to note it’s an interesting snippet about somebody I find fascinating and complicated, if somewhat intimidating.

Hitchens is a regular guest on Lateline and recently appeared with Tony Jones to discuss Hitch-22.

Some reviewers have given the memoir a tepid reception but it’s one of my favourite reads of 2010 so far.

Much of Hitchens’ drinking seems to take place at long, hilarious dinners that go late into the night.  In Hitch-22, the author recounts regular lunches with his dazzling Prat Pack (my words, not his) including Martin Amis, Clive James, James Fenton, Ian McEwan and Salman Rushdie.

A chief goal at these gatherings seems to be outwitting and outsmarting each other with wordplay.  The group once held a competition to see who could come up with the best paragraph parodying Graham Greene: Greene himself entered under a pseudonym and placed third.

Some of the games were less erudite that you might imagine.  One of the favourites was replacing a word in a famous book or film title with something crass. 

For example, substitute the word ‘dick’ for ‘heart’: ‘I Left my Dick in San Francisco’, ‘The Dick is a Lonely Hunter’, ‘Dickbreak Hotel’. 

Limericks were another favourite pastime, of which the British historian, Robert Conquest, apparently had no peer.  This is his effort when asked to condense ‘The Seven Ages of Man’ from Shakespeare’s ‘As You Like It’:

Seven Ages: first puking and mewling
Then very pissed-off with your schooling
Then fucks, and then fights
Next judging chaps’ rights
Then sitting in slippers: then drooling.

The game that most tickled me was a competition to come up with new equivalents for the old phrase ‘cruising for a bruising’. 

Amis came up with ‘angling for a mangling’.  Hitchens offered ‘aiming for a maiming’.  Other efforts included ‘strolling for a rolling’ and ‘thirsting for a worsting’.  (If I may be so bold as to add my own: how about ‘bleating for a beating’ or ‘plumping for a thumping’?)

This fortnight’s list of ten things to read, watch or listen to has a bias towards Hitchens and his posse:

1. This New Yorker article about Christopher Hitchens is one of the best profiles I’ve ever read.  A great subject and a brilliant execution.

2. As I mentioned earlier, Hitch-22 has had some lukewarm reviews, including in The Financial Times and The Guardian.  But this more positive take in The New York Times is closest to my opinion.

3. Ian McEwan’s essay on the power of love in the aftermath of September 11 was very fine work indeed if you missed it at the time.

4. It’s worth checking out the twitter page of Martin Amis  for a master class in how to be profound, witty and/or offensive in 140 characters or fewer. Among many memorable lines is this one about feminist Natasha Walter: ‘Natasha Walter – I’d give her one.  It’s the way her mouth says “misogynist objectification”.  It’s a soft, wide rosebud, wanton yet yielding.’

5. Peter is a man who likes to sew.  He writes about it on his blog Male Pattern Boldness and he sometimes makes swinging dresses for his ‘cousin’ Cathy.  Watch his Doris Day impersonation – he’s rather adorable if you ask me.

6. Paul Toohey has written a cracker of a yarn for The Daily Telegraph about digging for the bones of Peter Falconio with a psychic.

7. I recently came across the band Pomplamoose on You Tube.  Their career is almost entirely conducted online.  They are really fantastic – check out this cover of Beyonce’ Single Ladies . This version of Nature Boy is also excellent.

8. It’s worth reading Tony Martin’s regular column on Scriveners’ Fancy this week solely for the anecdote about his encounter with George Lucas at Barney’s in New York.

9. If you’re interested in US politics, check out this New York magazine article about the money-making machine that is Sarah Palin. It explains her huge appeal to the American public and why she is still a fixture on the political scene.

10. This week, it was Memorial Day in the United States (their equivalent of Anzac Day).  This blog posted 100 of the greatest military photos ever taken.

Most commented

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • KH says:

      08:01am | 04/06/10

      I love Christopher Hitchens.  I just love him.  And it is a very good book -  I’m only half way through, but some things you just want to savour!

    • Jeff says:

      05:36pm | 04/06/10

      God loves Christopher:)

    • the apologist says:

      08:55am | 04/06/10

      ‘Collision’ Hitchens v Wilson was an interesting dvd. I find Hitchens to be a much more accessible face to pop-athiesm than most of his contemporaries.

    • Phil says:

      09:15am | 04/06/10

      How about “hankering for a spankering”?

    • Crusader says:

      01:29pm | 05/06/10

      “Braying for a slaying”?

    • Jon says:

      09:43am | 04/06/10

      Hitchens, iconoclast par excellence. A very sharp wit for the Atheist view.  When watching his many debates with the religious, I almost feel sorry for them, almost!

    • Chris Oliver says:

      09:45am | 04/06/10

      I’m embarrassed to say I used to (almost) love Christopher HItchens. I still think highly of God is Not Good, The Missionary Position (about Mother Teresa), Regime Change, (about Iraq) and many of the brief pieces collected together in For the Sake of Argument. But The Trial of Henry Kissinger was tedious in a way not all meticulously constructed indictments have to be and No One Left to Lie To, his book about the Clintons, was trivial and full of bombast.
      Hitch-22: I think it’s a dreadful book; shallow, windy, dull, uninsightful, badly written. It’s tired and tiring, bored and boring, a lot of the case-making reminds me of dull-witted barristers going through the motions on rainy Fridays. Compare his prose with Robert Hughes’s infinitely more sparkling prose in Things I Didn’t Know and its shortcomings will be obvious. Hitch might use obscure words and French phrases, but this isn’t erudition, he uses them clumsily and inappropriately.
      Yes, he has famous friends and it would be appropriate to mention them if they had something to say, but there’s all too much empty name-dropping here. Irrelevant and perhaps presumptuous and fake references to “my good friend” go nowhere, with them saying or doing nothing that adds to the story.
      The chapter on Iraq is particularly disgraceful (and I say that as a supporter of the war). Hitchens never fails to tip a bucket of scorn over his enemies, never withholds accusations of naivety or mendacity, yet what does he say about his “friend” Ann Clwyd, the originator of those lurid pre-war stories of human shredding machines (Times headline: “See men shredded and then say you don’t back war”)? Nothing critical at all.
      He ends a dreadful, evasive chapter with a human story of a dead American soldier and Hitchens fan (the soldier wanted to be a writer, like Hitch, and went to war so he would have something to write about). This being HItch, the American soldier is one of humanity’s finest and most noble human beings, not a mercenary seeking fame in someone else’s country, and his side will prevail because it’s virtuous, unlike their opponents. It’s not analysis, it’s schmaltz, and it would disgrace the pages of USA Today.
      Leigh, thanks so much for linking to all those different sites but if HItch-22 truly is one of your favourite reads this year you need a good bookseller’s non-condescending advice.

    • 6c legs says:

      01:32pm | 04/06/10

      But isn’t that what happens to the sort of hard drinking ‘mega-A-type-poisonality’, like Hitchens?

      NO ONE gets to evade the damage that years of hard drinking/smoking/living does to ones body, *no one*.
      I would be more surprised if his writing *hadn’t* lost it’s edge.

      Has CH reached that inevitable point of being “the scary alcoholic uncle” ? (the one that no one lets their children near during the family reunions one can’t get out of attending)
      If he has, it was just a matter of time.

      But, whadda way to go.  And maybe if the fellas who decide on things like taking countries to war spent more time boozing*,  writing, and mulling things over with eachother, then less of we ordinary plebs would get used up as cannon fodder? hmmm

      * they’d be too busy trying to knock eachothers brains out, and too hung over the next morning to follow up on anything they decided… of course it would only work if they had no access to phones/twitter/email to send any Orders through with…
      Apologies for getting so off topic - just blame the imagined liquid lunch i’ve just indulged myself with, to celebrate the likes of CH!

      BTW, enjoyed your critique,  cheers grin

    • Chris Oliver says:

      03:54pm | 04/06/10

      God is Not Good: Salman Rushdie thinks it should be called God is Not, the real title is God is Not Great. Stephen (2.58pm) I’ll send you the Iraq comments any time you like. My email address is oliverandmaxwell@yahoo.com.au - easily available on other News Ltd blogs if this one won’t publish it.

    • 6c legs says:

      11:27am | 04/06/10

      Will never forget that memorable ‘interview’  with Hitchens on ABC’s Lateline a couple years back.
      Poor Tony Jones trying to be serious - and Hitchens pissed beyond anything i thought possible, and not be unconcious !
      it was pure gold.

      but it musta been fun trying to justify the cost to the purse-holders the next time his name came up as the ‘go-to-talent’ ??? lol

      I look forward to reading his latest, and trying to fathom the ‘Why’s of Hitchen’  (that should keep me off the street for all of 20minutes.. )

    • Jon says:

      11:47am | 04/06/10

      Hitchens, iconoclast par excellence. He has a very sharp wit, for the Atheist view.  When watching his many debates with the religious, I almost feel sorry them, almost!

    • Dan says:

      05:26am | 05/06/10

      He certainly think he has a sharp wit. I don’t think he’s witty in the slightest.

    • bella starkey says:

      12:29pm | 04/06/10

      Christopher Hitchen’s pisses me off.

      I pretty much agree with most of his opinions but I really don’t want to because he is such a smug wanker.

      I don’t think he should be held up as a voice for atheism because his demeanor is so patronising it turns everyone off. He talks down to people, he believes in his own wit and cleverness in such a way that it becomes repulsively egotistical.

      Hold him up against someone like Stephen Fry, who has the a similar profile and beliefs. Fry is clever and witty and opinionated but he doesn’t act like a twat towards anyone who doesn’t agree with him, he doesn’t assume that the opposition is stupid and treat them that way just because they don’t think in the same way he does.

    • 6c legs says:

      03:04pm | 04/06/10

      Stephen Fry; now there’s someone I would love to be privileged enough to hang out with, and couldn’t agree more with your last paragraph, “Ms Starkey”.

      Could it be as simple as Fry “likes who he is”, and Hitchen never has?

    • Dan says:

      05:46am | 05/06/10

      I adore Stephen Fry! :D

      As for Hitchens, I can’t stand him. He’s an ignorant and narcissistic baffoon who loves the sound of his own voice; thinks he’s Oscar Wilde reborn; is incredibly defensive whenever people dare to question him; thinks he’s some kind of expert on international politics when most of his views are absurd and/or downright offensive; has made Islamophobic and anti-semtic as well as genocidal comments; has no understanding beyond what affects him so he had to undergo waterboarding order to see, that, yes, it is torture; and as well as falsely believing himself to be an authority on religion and international politics, is just an extremist.

    • Dan says:

      05:50am | 05/06/10

      P.S. As well as being incredibly patronising and ‘repulsively egotistical’ (very true Bella), he seems to believe that simply because he calls himself a social commentator therefore people should care what he has to say. I certainly don’t.

    • stephen says:

      02:58pm | 04/06/10

      Louis Nowra’s review in The Oz was also a bit sandy, though I’d buy the book if only for Christopher’s explanation for the Iraq War.
      Apparently, he is sore that he may only be remembered as a Journalist, and not a Novelist. This is not a common complaint, is it ?

    • Daniel says:

      10:56pm | 04/06/10

      I just read his interview on Lateline. Amazing slick guy. So switched on with society.

    • Julius Brasse says:

      11:09am | 16/03/11

      Hitchens has been someone that I constantly write about when I was a in college taking up a degree in Literature. Evert time I wrote Human-Interest stories, there is almost always an anecdote about him, if not, he’s the main topic of my discussion. I remember including my works about him in my cv writing and surprisingly, it impressed the employers that I had job interviews on. To be clear I do not have the same drinking habits as him but I feel that I connect with his behavior in some way.

    • Trix says:

      11:34am | 21/11/11

      Keep these artlices coming as they’ve opened many new doors for me.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter