Believe the polls and something almost mystical has happened over the past few months – our Prime Minister has changed from being an affable and competent leader to a human disaster area.

Magic touch: John Tiedemann in The Daily Telegraph last week.

This week’s Essential Report builds on a growing sum of polling evidence that Labor is facing a tough fight for re-election and that a large part of the problem appears to be the Prime Minister himself.

Take a look at the shift in the ratings of the PM’s character attributes – a decline that has him nearly as unpopular as his opponent Tony Abbott – and you would be forgiven for thinking the PM has undergone some sort of radical personality therapy which has gone horribly wrong.

Describe this image

Of course, the reality is that Kevin Rudd has not changed over the past three months – it is just that our perceptions of the sort of person he is have been challenged by some of the decisions he has made.

If there is good news it is on issues of work ethic – hard-working and not complacent - Rudd still scores highly. Clearly, no one wants him to sleep less.

The problems emerge around the attributes that go to competence and commitment.On issues of competence Rudd is down as a capable leader and down on his ability to handle a crisis – likely the fall-out from the insulation debacle and the continuing questions about value derived from the school-building program.

On issues of commitment, the perception that the PM was prepared to walk away from his principles is hiring him on indicators like vision, superficiality, honesty and trustworthiness.

Other indicators are harder to understand. According to the people, Rudd is now less intelligent, more demanding and more out of touch than he used to be. It is as if he has passed a tipping point when he is no longer capable of possessing a positive attribute.

The one indicator where you would be feeling a little aggrieved if you were Kevin is the ‘too inflexible’, given the decision to scrap the ETS – an act of master flexibility – was seen as one of the major drivers behind the current slippage in the polls.

But here, like in all the key indicators, we can see a shift away from the narrative that made Rudd such a strong performing leader – whether real or confected, he was our understated statesman, our man with a plan who you could trust in a crisis.

So is the position irretrievable? Like so much in personality-based politics, there is always a way to write a new story. For mine, the numbers are lining up for the sort of public celebrity confessional, that allows us to believe a leader has confronted he has done wrong, is prepared to change and will emerge stronger from the public shaming.

For Kevin, this could start along the following lines:

- I am devastated that our efforts to keep the economy moving in tough times led to the death of young Australians. That loss weighs heavily on me.

- I was wrong to say that we would delay action on climate change – I am going to keep pushing an ETS even if it makes me unpopular

- I have learned from these mistakes and that is why I will be a stronger leader in my second term.

Corny? Sure, but politics is show business for ugly people. Kevin Rudd has to stop acting as if it is contest of the smartest policy mind. Quickly.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

208 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Steve says:

      06:24am | 11/05/10

      Time for Gillard.

    • Old Clive says:

      07:11am | 11/05/10

      You’ve got to be joking, It’s TIME for another change altogether, she is as accident prone as Rudd, Slow in brain and speech.

    • Ted Hayward says:

      07:28am | 11/05/10

      He is after-all being true to his training and background - a true bureaucrat in the Chinese tradition - an machine man from the chattering elite who will do whatever he can to sustain his position. If unsuccessful in one domain, he will switch to another before the failure becomes too apparent.  Next post - the United Nations?

    • Megan says:

      08:03am | 11/05/10

      I can’t stand listening to her when she says “O-strayliya”. She is as slimy and tricky as Rudd.

    • Peter says:

      08:14am | 11/05/10

      Old Clive…Abbott is quick of speech and thought? You are kidding, of course? Abbott is negative with no policies and has made his own errors, anyone remember Barnaby Joyce?

      Have a look at Australia compared to the rest of the world…we are in so much better shape it’s not funny, and that was nothing to do with Abbott. It took bold decisive action…not Tony’s forte, sporting ability aside

      Be careful what you wish for Old Clive, you just might get it.

    • Paul2 says:

      09:12am | 11/05/10

      Barnaby Joyce’s greatest crime appears to be his aversion to debt.  Maybe that’s not popular with the global bankers who really run things.

    • Mark says:

      09:13am | 11/05/10

      Peter - Abbott has no policies? If you weren’t writing on a blog, I would swear that you never read the newspaper. Abbott has done well to announce things like his alternate ETS proposal given his limited resources.

      Do you realize that an opposition doesn’t get govt resources to do policy costings until an election is called and the government goes into ‘caretaker’ mode? At that point, all parties can use DOFA or Treasury to cost their proposals to announce. Until then, they have to pay someone like KPMG with Party donations.

      Or… you could just go down the Rudd election route and copy Howard’s costed policies, then add that you will ‘sign Kyoto’ and ‘say sorry’, which obviously don’t have costings involved.

    • watty says:

      09:42am | 11/05/10

      Yes Peter. I remember Barnaby Joyce.Isn’t he the guy who predicted that if a country got into too much debt it would crash and burn.

      Of Course all will be revealed tonight when Swan lets us know how much Australia has borrowed, what interest rate we are paying and term of loans.

      Wonder if the new “super tax” on mining will be included as an earner in tonight’s Budget

    • Far Canal says:

      10:12am | 11/05/10

      Yeah right Steve, do you really want a former union lawyer running the country???

    • Blossom says:

      10:20am | 11/05/10

      Old Clive you previously stated you retired from work at only age 56 and now are living off taxpayers on the pension!! Why on earth would anyone listen to you!!

    • Old Clive says:

      10:41am | 11/05/10

      Hello Blossom, my only mistake was not becoming a politician, I could have been like all our ex-pollies, don’t you think they are bludging on you tax payers as well. Some of them didn’t have to wait till they were 55 one actually retired at 33, and now we have a 21 year old in the SA parliament .
      Get a life. Do you believe evrything you read and hear, you would have to vote LaboUr, they couldn’t get things right even at the start.

    • Jane says:

      11:05am | 11/05/10

      Steve - ‘time for Gillard’....yeah you and the ALP wish…as was the original plan.

      The LABOR Party is at fault here….not solely Rudd.
      Labor as an entity have failed and shown to be incompetent….you won’t get away with sheeting home all blame to Rudd…..Gillard (the Red Dalek) is just as culpable and Labor as a whole collectively OWN the failings across all departments..

    • Moggy says:

      11:07am | 11/05/10

      You do realise that Gillard was a member of the communist party?? Well, I guess her election to the position of PM would please China!!

    • Jane says:

      12:02pm | 11/05/10

      Gillard has been/or was ‘set up’ nicely….nice plan.
      All those school halls that people would be voting in and be reminded of come polling day….even with a compulsary gratuitous plaque so you can’t fail to notice…BONUS!!

      Except????

      ............that this perfectly crafted deceit and manipulation using so called ‘stimulus’ to pay for their plan will backfire bigtime.

      All those school halls and buildings rorted, over costed and with borrowed money overtly wasted will become Labor’s - MONOLITHS OF SHAME.

      Yes, take note as you gaze around and marvel at the absolute squander and wastage, and take in the concrete representations of Labor failure…right before you vote. smile

    • Peter says:

      12:12pm | 11/05/10

      MArk, Abbott’s alternative ETS policy was a joke…pretty much everyone recognised it for what it was, even in the newspapers I did read, as was his super policy. He’s a policy vacuum, and with an election coming up you’d think he’d pull his finger out. it’s very easy to be negative about everything..and block in the senate with the help of Family First, (another winner if ever there was one).., it’s another thing entirely to come up with alternatives that are viable. Let the elected government govern…

      As for Rudd ‘copying’ Howard’s policies…bit of right wing beat up wasn’t it?

    • voter says:

      12:15pm | 11/05/10

      Sure, Rudd is being found out for who is is… and isn’t.  But, at the core of Labor’s problems is the Labor’s left-leaning ‘socialist’ philosophy of ‘legislate for more control, as the punters can’t think/act/manage their own affairs for themselves’.  Ultimately, it ideally should (but doesn’t) achieve a level playing field for all.  The Liberals’ philosophy on the other hand is to ‘legislate to reward self motivated effort so the punters can make their own chosen destiny a reality’ (better know as ‘you reap what you sow’).  The best example of this so far is the home insulation programme.  Labor artificially stimulated a once robust, well run industry of approximately 500 installers nationally, employing only Australians, but screwed it up by over-stimulating it and attracting dodgy operaters, including overseas operaters/call centres, to get their share of the $2.8 billion ‘hand out’.  How would the Libs have handled this?  Just as they did with the solar panels and gas conversion in cars during the Howard years… put the power in the car/home owner so they can to do their own research; find their preferred supplier (based on their criteria); and pay for the job and then apply for the subsidy back from the government.  Instead, in their haste, through poor planning and management, this Labor government over-stimulated one part of the economy and stuffed it up.  For me, it’s the Labor philosophy (and in some cases lack there of), that is wrong with how they are leading this country.

    • Peter says:

      12:20pm | 11/05/10

      Gillard? That’s funnier than voting for the Greens…

    • Ann says:

      12:40pm | 11/05/10

      No not Julia Gillard.  She is a died-in-the-wool socialist leftie and leopards do not change their spots. She would be as big a disaster as Kevin Rudd. Some of us saw what Kevin Rudd was really like from the beginning BUT no one would listen.

    • Christian Real says:

      01:41pm | 11/05/10

      Mark,
      But Mark, it appears that you are wrong, doesn’t the Liberal party get well looked after by their mega rich friends in the Mining businesses in way of generous donations to fill their party’s coffers

    • IDONTVOTE says:

      02:01pm | 11/05/10

      Licorice Lips Rudd has shown he is hoping to capture the voters attention with a seedy looking budget.
      No way will this budget get him anymore support. Good riddance Rudd, maybe you can team up with Deep throat Bligh as she is on the nose in Qld and will be unemployed soon as well.

    • Liberalfan says:

      03:40pm | 11/05/10

      Old Clive I remember you writing that last week.  Politicians give service to the country for their retirement, they don’t retire early then expect the taxpayer to pay them a pension for them to sit at home like you do. Your comments are worthless.

    • Evan Findlay says:

      06:35pm | 11/05/10

      Mark, Abbott’s ETS policy merely threw between 15 and 45 billion dollars at big polluting industries so that they could, and let me quote Tony correctly here, ” Continue as business as usual”. Great stuff Mark! $45 Billion dollars to keep doing what your doing and not have to show anything in return. Obviously the Liberal Party has moved on from unsustainable middle class welfare to unsustainable upper class welfare!

    • Nicholas Folkes says:

      08:29pm | 11/05/10

      No thanks. Mickey Mouse would do a better job than ‘Big Red’. Time for a change of political parties. Labor is absolutely useless on all fronts.

      The Resource Tax, ETS, BER, Insulation, Illegals, Unsustainable immigration policy, Tax on Smokes, Health debacle and relaxing foreign invstment laws so Chinese CP officials can buy up Australian residential property.

      ‘No’ to Labor. I’m sick of the lies and total mismanagement. Deport Rudd to the UN forever.

    • I am so lucky says:

      10:34pm | 13/05/10

      The doom sayers of the government have had it too good. Look what’s going around the world in Europe. Kevin Rudd has dealt with the GFC in an extra ordinary fashion. I was made redundant during the GFC and I am thankful to be able to secure a job in no time due to his decisive actions. Our economic credentials are rock solid. This is a man who fights for those in need, yet others are happy to let the rich miner continue minting their bank accounts. Look outside Australia and you’d appreciate where we are today. Why is it that the world looks at Australia as the lucky country?

    • Nigel Catchlove says:

      06:58am | 11/05/10

      Kevin07 has always been arrogant, superficial and narrow minded.  He is not and has never been PM material and people are starting to see through the spin and understand the underlying character of this politician and his team. 

      No secrets here, just reality. 

      Abbott could still lose the election because the age old adage still holds true that oppositions don’t win power, governments lose it; but just a tiny swing in the right places could see this government become a one termer.

    • persephone says:

      08:20am | 11/05/10

      Or, like SA, big swings for the Libs in the wrong places might mean little change at all.

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      08:48am | 11/05/10

      persephone :  keep clinging to those straws , not much else you can do. heh heh heh.

    • Nora Charles says:

      09:54am | 11/05/10

      Quite right Nigel, and the media knew it.

      But because of their reflexive disdain for conservatives the Canberra press gallery, aided and abetted by their general news cohort disguised Rudd’s foibles from the public.

      At least with Mark Latham you could see he was a lunatic, with Rudd the media did their best to hide his less attractive side.

    • EJ says:

      11:14am | 11/05/10

      Persephone, why is it that you cannot see the reality of what’s happened? The insulation debacle. The rorts in the educattion scheme etc etc etc. People died because of the Labor governments ineptitude & you still spit venom on people for not wanting them in power anymore?? And as for that phoney Kevin Rudd…..out here in reality land even old aged pensioners in the safe Labor seat of Moreland in Victoria are going to vote Liberal just to see the back of him, despite him paying them $900 to vote for him!!

    • Nora Charles says:

      12:30pm | 11/05/10

      In defence of Persephone, I would argue that she is right. There can be large swing against Labor but unless it is in the right seats in sufficient quantities to depose current MPs, then nothing will change at all.

      Viz-a-viz the recent UK elections. The Tories won the most seats but they may still end up with Brown as MP.

    • Matt Stewart says:

      12:39pm | 11/05/10

      Are you the same persephone who said the negative poll result last week was just a rogue poll?  Well, now we’ve had three ‘rogue’ polls in a row, what are the odds of that?

      Nigel is right.  Rudd was always just a slick operator in a nice suit.  It was inevitable that people would start to see through the facade eventually, it was only a question of when.

    • Moses Hickory says:

      01:50pm | 11/05/10

      Yep couldn’t agree more. The rose coloured glasses are coming off. But the Australian public is to blame for voting him in in the first place. Most Australians took the easy option. Instead of facing reality, they bought into Rudd’s sugar coated and grossly unrealistic pre-election promises. It’s basically the old adage, “if it sounds too good to be true it probably is”

    • Steve woy woy says:

      06:08pm | 11/05/10

      So much talk for a man with so little to offer.. please Tony who??

      The talk of spin is so much yesterday drivel.. The spin kings, gee you are surly not for real here!! Buzzword central just keep saying it and it will take hold in some sectors, which was the previous governments mantra. We had ten years plus of this very orchestrated cynical programme by the previous government that would be closer to the mark. First step day one sack all the heads of departments within government, replace with own people. (hence the Gordon Greech affair)
      We had the greatest education programme perpetrated on the Australian public ever known, The Dumbing Down Of A Nation. Cost to us about 3mil a week!!

      So the next faze of the programme will be press the so-called Pavlov dog button for the Howard battlers with the choice words we know they react too!! Dig out some of those really nice emotive words from the buzzword party book… they will salivate on those… after all we spent all that money training them!!!

      Then we will have a Tony Abbott team that bought in the 1st home buyers grant which artificially inflated house prices out of everyone’s reach sold every profitable publicly owned enterprise to get a very short sighted budget surplus. Then sysimaticly set about destroying workers rights, believe that the environment is crap, cut education, health, law and order whilst setting up middle class welfare systems. Manipulated employment figures by classing people who worked for the dole as being employed, and who forced people who wanted to look for work onto pensions… then called it good economics!!  More like EGOnomics really which worked well for someone who lived in Kirribilli then spent over one million dollars per year of our money to travel to work. And on top of all that Abbott might happily forget that while he and his former government colleagues were steering the good ship Australia, the nation’s total debt soared from a mere $700 billion in 1997 up to $3.2 trillion by the close of their term. An increase of 387%’‘. Deregulation brought growth all right. But there is a yin for every yang. The Opposition may well brag that it left office with zero debt - zero government debt that is - as the upshot of policy was to lump it onto the consumer.

      Well, we will have to be very naïve and gullible beyond our wildest dreams if we have a leader who believes women are for housework and breeding, everyone should go to church on Sunday, acts like a spoilt brat when things don’t go his way and becomes the bully he perpetrates. All sounds good for our school system to say the least… need we mention health…. I think not!!!

    • from the trenches says:

      06:23pm | 11/05/10

      Pers, you remain a ledgend in your own (paper bagged) lunchtime. Hades is a cold place! Wish for a renewal in Spring but don’t expect a friutful harvest from Rudd.

    • Evan Findlay says:

      06:46pm | 11/05/10

      Nora Charles, the electorate and media also see Tony Abbott as a right wing religious lunatic, hence why people still can’t bring themselves to vote for him. If the Liberals dumped Tony for a more moderate and middle of the road politician they might just win the next election. But with Tony at the helm they are doomed. On AM radio the other day he resurrected workchoices and agreed with Minchin that the safety net that Howard implemented diminished the policies appeal. The guy is an idiot. Behind Howard, workchoices was the next reason why people didn’t vote for the coalition. Tony wants to bring it back in it’s original form without the safety net. Good luck with that!!! And if you missed it, you will surely be seeing it in advertisements soon.

    • Nora Charles says:

      09:25pm | 11/05/10

      Exactly wrong, Evan.

      We’ve just seen what a centrist conservative has done in the UK elections. Nothing, nada -  5 more years of a Lib-Dem backed Labour Party.

      The same would happen here in Australia. Abbott is providing a point of difference. Reflexive Christian-haters would vote for Abbott any way, so he hasn’t lost their vote. But sensible people who have actually taken the time to listen to what he’s had to say are liking it.

    • John A Neve says:

      06:59am | 11/05/10

      In case people have forgotten one person does not run this country, the Rudds and Abbotts of this world come and go.

      The thing that should be ongoing is the phylosophy, the vision the long term objective. Question, does either of the major parties have a vision?
      If you answer Yes, please tell me what it is?

      The fact is, the country lurches like a drunk, this way, then that way, anything that goes wrong, blame the government.

      Democracy in this country is whithout a doubt,  dead,

    • persephone says:

      08:22am | 11/05/10

      Labor thinks its more important to keep people employed than to keep the budget in surplus.

      The Libs think its more important to protect big business from paying tax.

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      08:42am | 11/05/10

      persephone :  According to Treasurer Swan , the priority has changed dearie , please try to keep up with Labor back-flips pers, a budget designed to bring forward a surplus is the mantra today.
      Oh by the way , pers ,  it’s more important that big business have the ability to employ people than tax the arse off them.

    • Chaos says:

      09:07am | 11/05/10

      Keeping business with low tax allows them to create more jobs and invest more. Creating a sustainable economy.

      Throwing money away to create jobs, spikes the employment figures, but what happens when the money runs out? See the disaster in Europe.

    • JA says:

      09:18am | 11/05/10

      Labor thinks it is more important to keep people employed than to keep the budget in surplus.”

      Pers you are for sure trained in the ALP thought school, as John Howard proved as Australia’s best ever Prime Minster, there is no need to trade one off against the other, the Libs achieved a surplus, record low unemployment, paid of debt and saved for the future, allowed freedom of choice, stopped the boats and didn’t kill young Australians with their recklessness,

      All while surviving the dot com boom and Asian currency crisis.

      You need to get you more Pers, there is a whole new world of competence in government on the Liberal side for you to discover.

    • me my mo says:

      09:27am | 11/05/10

      “The insulation industry estimates 8000 installers lost their jobs, along with another 1400 people working in the manufacturing of batts, as a result of the February 19 suspension.”

      “Business groups continued to blast the Opposition Leader for his plan to pay for the scheme with a $2.7 billion tax on the top 3200 companies, Mr Abbott faced some heated question from his own MPs.”

      Yeah… Labor is all about keeping people employed and Liberals about protecting big business from tax.

    • watty says:

      09:47am | 11/05/10

      Labor “thinks” a lot of things persephone…“760,000 coastal homes will be lost”,“greatest moral challenge” “I knew nothing about warnings on hazards of insulation scheme”

      What does Labor DO?

    • John says:

      09:57am | 11/05/10

      Sadly I agreed, the power has been shifting slowly away from the people for decades with the help of our so-called leaders. The corporation’s run most western countries and whose only criteria is to make 1% of the world population very rich. The GFC was proof of that.

    • persephone says:

      10:36am | 11/05/10

      Wayne

      I’m talking about priorities - now that jobs have been protected, and the worst of the GFC seems to be over, we can now talk about getting back into surplus.

      Labor can walk and chew gum - protect jobs and deliver a sound economy.

      As for ‘taxing the arse off’ big business, Tony was the one who introduced the idea that businesses earning lots of money should pay extra tax.

      The mining tax - as explained by a former Mining council executive - will create jobs and stimulate the economy, because it cuts tax rates for smaller companies (which tend to be more labour intensive), encourages exploration and extends the working lives of mines.

      Until a mine is earning profits of over 10% it will in fact pay less tax than it does at present.

    • Dash says:

      10:59am | 11/05/10

      Persephone, I have quietly been reading your comments on here for months now. I always get a laugh out of you! You have the blinkers on big time! If Labor thinks it’s more important to keep people employed, why has the unemployment rate gone up since this government came to power? It was at 3.6% when they took office. Also under Keating, unemployment reached 10% with over 1m Australians out of a job.

      Also, Labor is proposing to reduce the company tax rate to 28%. That will reduce the amount of tax “big business” pays! And it will increase the descrepency between personal income tax and the company tax rate. I am a father of three supporting a wife and a mortgage and I pay more than the corporate tax rate in effective tax. They’re for “Working families” my @rse! What the hell are you talking about?

      Two weeks ago we had 125 taxes in Australia. As of last week we now have 126 and Labor call that reform??

    • watty says:

      11:34am | 11/05/10

      Heavens to Betsy persephone.How dare they? Everybody knows making profit….BAD!

      More than 10% profit”  Bugger the “super tax”.The gallows for these greedy monsters and all their shareholders. Take it you don’t have a super fund with investment in mining?
      As a former Member of the Executive of the Minerals Council I suggest you quote what the present Council is saying and doing about the proposed tax.

    • Daryl says:

      11:53am | 11/05/10

      Persephone, the corporate tax rate is currently 30% and it’s a flat tax. The more profit you make, the more tax you pay! Seems fair to me the way it is. Or have I got that wrong?

    • Randal says:

      11:54am | 11/05/10

      Hey Perse, you might want to send that to Canadian Finance Minister, who see’s the Big New Resources Tax as an opportunity for further investment in the Canadian resources sector.

      He seems to understand what you do not, that smashing successful investments with a giant penalty tax actually leads to less investment and see’s those investment dollars flow into other markets with friendlier tax breaks.

      That’s the reality of the Resources Tax, it is a short sighted tax that will curtail new investment and in the end push the price of local energy through the roof, cost jobs, and damage the single sector that actually saved Australia through the GFC.

      In time there will be no ‘Super Profits’ and no projects, so tell us Perse, what will the ALP do then???

      What is the next industry in their sites to make up for the eventual shortfall - finance, superannuation, Retail… where does the addiction to penalising those who employ Australians actually stop???

      When will this short sighted government realise that it is business that drives the Australian economy, creates employment growth and that to keep attacking it with giant taxes like an ETS and a RRT will only hurt all those ‘working families’ that the ALP likes to pretend they care about ???

    • Rover says:

      12:03pm | 11/05/10

      Dash, according to the ABS website, the unemployment rate in November 2007 was 4.5 per cent, not 3.6.

    • Christian Real says:

      01:35pm | 11/05/10

      wayne,
      It appears that is more important that the Australian people benefit from the minerals and the ore that these foreign mining companies are digging out of our country’s soil, then all those huge generous donations to fill the Liberal party coffers, it appears easy to see who is buying which political party…..

    • Dash says:

      01:46pm | 11/05/10

      Thanks for the clarification Rover. Point is, it’s now 5.3 and was at 5.8 a few months back under this government.

    • Randal says:

      02:37pm | 11/05/10

      @Christian Real - So you think the Broken Hill Mining Company, which employs 40,000 Australians, has it’s headquarters in Melbourne, is listed on the ASX, and is 60% owned by Australian’s is a foreign company do you?

      That does seem a little xenophobic to me, perhaps you could please explain??

      Or are you just being duped by the Rudd spin and mantra, incapable of thinking for yourself?

    • Evan Findlay says:

      06:51pm | 11/05/10

      Chaos, you should learn about what is happening in Europe rather than making ill informed and un-educated comments. The problems in Greece are more to do with tax evasion that “throwing money away to create jobs”

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      06:58pm | 11/05/10

      Christian :  You seem to have conveniently forgotten that Clive Palmer has donated huge sums of money to the A.L.P. on behalf of his mining companies. If you check the appropriate records you will find that Labor has recieved big money from mining in the past , but i imagine that the mining industry in the future , will tell Labor to perform a certain sexual act upon themselves.

    • Steve woy woy says:

      10:45am | 12/05/10

      @ Dash
      Your not suggesting they should use the Mountebank Johnny EGOnomics scales are you??
      Manipulated employment figures by classing people who worked for the dole as being employed, and who forced people who wanted to look for work onto pensions… then called it good economics!!

    • Old Clive says:

      07:17am | 11/05/10

      You’ve got to be joking!!!. She is as accident prone as Rudd. In reality she is as slow as her speech.

    • Simon says:

      06:51pm | 11/05/10

      Old Clive you are, after reading this, now on my list of local Heroes. 
      I find myself agreeing with you on so many things, including Pollies pensions, why can’t they just have Super like the rest of us, it’s not like they don’t get paid.  Please keep it up mate your doing well!

    • Jill says:

      07:19am | 11/05/10

      I agree, Rudd has not changed but that perceptions of him have changed.  My sense is that no matter of the precise questions and answers there is greater disenchantment or perhaps just disappointment that Rudd has not delivered on some of the fronts that are highly valued in the community.  Rudd indeed may have a plan but it is hard to understand it when it seems more to be a game of delay and withdrawal.

      Hmm corny lines?  If they are genuine and authentic then let’s hear them - if they are just lines to manage the media, I’m not interested.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      07:22am | 11/05/10

      My first ‘encounter’with Kevin Rudd was when he was on Ch7’s Sunrise programme. Even then he was all smoke’n'mirrors. He has had himself promoted as being all things to all people. He is desperate to be liked but would prefer to be loved.The ALP’s mistake has been that they are more concerned with selecting so-called Celebrity Candidates rather than people of substance, ability. They are ham-strung because other than theses vapid celebs they are tied to getting their candidates from, for the most part, within the ranks of the Union Movement. Pre-selection is a reward for senior unionists who have reached their “use By” dates within thier unions. It is no secret that those running the ALP behind the scenes decide who they want pre-selected and often simply present their candidate to the branches and tell them “this is the woman/man who is going to be your candidate”. That is democracy ALP-style. Rudd will never do a mea culpa for then he really would be branded a self-criticising apparatchik of the old USSR, modern China mold.

    • Against the Man says:

      07:25am | 11/05/10

      Rudd was always less intelligent in my book, the public is only waking up to this reality now. Krudd is laughing all the way to the polls knowing the vast majority will vote him in to do more damage to our country. Vote Rudd out. Zero results, 100% spender of taxpayer monies. Remember he increased tax, he shows no respect to teachers/doctors. He has created a health care policy that will costs us more w/ no results. Time for change.

    • Jonathan Appleyard says:

      10:34am | 11/05/10

      Let’s not forget that Kevin 07 was an “economic conservative”. What a lie that has turned out to be.

    • Atheistno1 says:

      07:53am | 11/05/10

      Rudd thinks he’s on a pedestal, re-writing the history books of heroic politics but the reality is; The public went into a fashion of sexist/popularity polarization & out popped this lunatic with the gift of nothing more than dribble; But then I suppose I’m just from the old school that taught us not to judge a book by it’s cover & I definitely didn’t judge Rudd in that fashion, I just saw his real intentions from the start.

      The psychological problems within the Labor party were evident then as they are even more so now, with comments from Nichola Roxon stating that “Cigarettes caused the cancer” that killed her father, as she hasn’t received the closure she should have. Mummy Claytons (Julia Gillard) can’t stop telling parents what their children’s needs are as they constant a nanny state. They steal Aboriginal unemployment benefits instead of using the law to enforce truancy.

      We all agree that the medicare system is what Australia want’s for it’s health system but it has become a blatant attack on the finances of our national security. The cancer council has become a government, public & privately funded organization that is being given even more funding now that the industries have been hit & in consultation with Roxon’s psychological problems. The drug administration has been contemplating putting up the price of legal drugs but the government have decided to subsidize them with the money they are getting from the recourse industry & smoker’s, causing the cutting of jobs in the tobacco industry & industry moving off shore to reestablish their business.

      It all makes one wonder where these children get their fiscal ideology from because it can’t be from the educational institutions they attended.

    • T.Chong says:

      08:11am | 11/05/10

      Atheistno1what is “the drug administration” ?.
      I want to give you benefit of doubt, that you have some insght / inside story on this, but you seem to be mixing up cause and effect.  Who has the “psychological problems ” with ‘baccy ?, Ms Roxon ,or ...,?
      PS you are aware that it was the Howard govt that set up the program that “steals” “Aboriginal unemployment benefits”

    • Nigel Catchlove says:

      08:31am | 11/05/10

      That’s not what the article says.  Besides, Tony’s God delusion is not much different than Kevin’s, they are both church going God-botherers although I have never seen Tony give a doorstop interview on the steps of a church.

    • Seano says:

      08:40am | 11/05/10

      Nigel confirms my suspicious that conservatives don’t get jokes.

      Tony Abbott confirms my suspicious that conservative don’t get science.

    • Mark says:

      09:03am | 11/05/10

      Who cares? As long as the bloke doesn’t waste my money like Rudd has done, I’m happy to have him in. At least he says what is on his mind and doesn’t have a team of spin doctors to give him his repetitive buzz words, like ‘working families’.

      At least you know you are getting Abbott.

    • DD says:

      09:05am | 11/05/10

      Tony is a cloimate change denying religious zealot who can’t leave his personal religion out of politics. Rudd attends church too, but at least his politics are secular.

    • JA says:

      09:27am | 11/05/10

      Tony Abbott is genuinely religious; he does not in any try to hide that even though it opens him to ridicule from the left and ALP.  He cops the ridicule on the chin and keeps on going.

      Rudd on the other hand does not appear to be genuinely religious, he is not believable and has not been honest with his faith. He uses religion to boost his popularity, shallow little creep that he is.

      If you had a mate who behaved like Rudd you would avoid him like the plague.

    • Mavis says:

      09:48am | 11/05/10

      The difference is that Rudd thinks he is Jesus.

    • PorkPie says:

      10:11am | 11/05/10

      Mavis Tony Abbotts knows he is Jesus without a doubt. Hes the ex trainee Catholic priest not Rudd!!

    • Charles Kelly says:

      11:05am | 11/05/10

      Religious zealotry?

      Ummmmmm, who’s party is trying to censor the internet - Rudd’s or Abbott’s?

    • Andrew says:

      11:14am | 11/05/10

      So Porky, It’s ok to be a little religious but not very religious.

      Religious Lite is politically safe but if you once studied to be a priest you must be a zealot. Ipso facto all priests are zealots? All practising catholics should not be allowed to hold public office? Does that go for protestants, muslims and hindus as well.

      I’m not religious myself but I am appalled by the bigotry being applied to those who are.

      Please provide evidence of religion controlling tony abbott’s political agenda or rudd’s.

      You’ve been drinking the cool aid.

    • EJ says:

      11:33am | 11/05/10

      So what if Abbott or Rudd are religious. It’s better than being a member of the communist party like Julia Gillard!!

    • Seano says:

      01:42pm | 11/05/10

      Yeah Mark because Howard and co spent your money so wisely, for example by telling you how wonderful they were…

      Oh EJ a commie jibe….I hope everyone is checking under their beds.

      Personally I just think it’s funny how Abbott wants to drag us back to the time of Jesus.

    • Nora Charles says:

      03:48pm | 11/05/10

      Seano et al - there is plenty of evidence for the Roman warming period, as there is for a Medieval warming period in which global temperatures were warmer than they are now.

      Perhaps you religious bigots might like to read some science for a change.

    • Dann2291 says:

      07:57am | 11/05/10

      Memo to Steve: Time for Gillard ?You gotta be joking , a vote for gillard is voting for the Same Lost Team of out of their depth and incompenent,.She has always supported the PM whether he is right or wrong mainly wrong.
      As for kevin Rudd ,he has shown us that to be honest not a born leader,certainly not a strong decisive one at that. Actually he appears gutless,a backpeddling,arrogant person. He talks down to us as if he is the main man . I do not like being treated as a boofhead or a lamebrain with ALL this Spin he comes out with ,he is so full of it and of himself. To me he conned us at the last election with knowing he was stating what he will do with knowing full well he cannot carry it thru ,so give the public what they want to hear,which is what he does .The public is finally waking up to not only him but his party as well. The debt they have got us into is absolutely pathetic and the mismanagement of taxpayers money is disgusting and we need the Libs in once more to get AUSTRALIA outof this qaugmire. I have learnt also never believe or trust a man who eats his own Ear Wax. grin

    • Peter says:

      08:16am | 11/05/10

      Good One Dann2291, that showed ‘em…keep voting Liberal mate, I don’t know what else you’d do

    • T.Chong says:

      08:38am | 11/05/10

      Well Dann2291 as far as “stating what he will do ...he cannot carry it thru” that sounds familiar, let me think…, thats right! it was Howard with his “core” and “NON core ” promises. Remember them? obviosly the precedent has been set.

    • eddie says:

      08:55am | 11/05/10

      If you want people to stop treating you like a lamebrain, either stop trying to use english or learn how to.

    • Atheistno1 says:

      08:33am | 11/05/10

      T. Chong, A) the people that give you legal drugs & flu shot’s.
      B) Read the what I wrote, it’s elf explanatory.
      C) Howard hasn’t been in power since he was regarded a war criminal. (2007)

    • T.Chong says:

      09:08am | 11/05/10

      Thanx Atheistno1, that clears everything up.
      Are you suggesting the cost of some pharmaceuticals should NOT be subsidised via the taxpayer?
      You would be condeming many thousands to an early death.

    • Nigel Catchlove says:

      09:24am | 11/05/10

      Your writing might be ‘elf’ explanatory but it makes no sense to humans on this site ... even rabid left-wing tree huggers like T.Chong who I never thought I would agree with.  What is the drug administration?  What is the ‘recourse industry’?

      Read the what I wrote? I can’t even guess what you mean.

      A few tips. 
      Smoker’s what? If it was meant as a plural then don’t use an apostrophe.
      The Government ‘has’ not have, there is only one government unless again you are writing about multiple governments.
      Judging a book by it’s cover - no apostrophe, ‘its’ is possessive, not a truncation of ‘it is’.
      We all make mistakes when typing but think of things from the perspective of the reader when you write and your views will be more apparent.

    • Rover says:

      10:12am | 11/05/10

      This is comedy gold.
      I hope.

    • Albert Szabo says:

      08:33am | 11/05/10

      Your comment:Dear Kevin Rudd.

      I used to vote for you and I will vote for you again this year, because you are the best prime minister for Australia EVER!!!  I strongly support your brave decision to increase the tax for the big mining companies.  As you said the ABUDANT amount of minerals belong to all Australian citizens!!! Saudi Arabia, Alaska and many other honest oil and mineral rich countries pay thousands of dollars monthly to their citizens.  Part of the profit I believe also belongs to the citizens too.

      I think the mining companies are not behaving in a very Australian way and they should not be crossing your government when trying to administer appropriate policies for the country.

      I hope that you and your government does not give into to the pressure being applied by these mining magnates.  It is your duty as the country’s leader to make decisions that benefit most of the Australian population not just a few.

    • Raol says:

      08:42am | 11/05/10

      He’s still negotiating, like his Health policy he’s very good at backing down when the going gets tough.

    • Aitch B says:

      09:58am | 11/05/10

      I don’t necessarily agree with your sentiments about the mining companies, Albert, but how refreshing it is to read a post (be it pro-Rudd or pro-Abbott) that doesn’t contain the usual ‘bagging the other side’ vitriol. Perhaps the ferals from both sides could take a leaf out of your book. Well done!!

    • Andrew says:

      11:27am | 11/05/10

      Albert,

      A couple of things,
      1. Saudi Arabia is a dictatorship that does not hand out thousands of dollars per month to its citizens. It is one of the most oppressive societies in the world, perhaps explaining why 16 of the 18 9/11 bombers were Saudi nationals.

      2. Alaska is not a country it is in fact a state of the USA. They do not pay thousands per month to their citizens. In fact the tax rate for mineral companies in the US is less than half of the proposed tax rate on Australian companies. The government in Alsaka do however offer incentives to people to move there to work in the resource projects.

      Finally, and I could go on and on, why don’t you take a good hard look at who owns these companies. Sure Clive Palmer and Andrew Forrest are rich but almost every Australia superannuant (that’s mum and dad investors) and retiree owns shares in the resources sector. This is a tax grab from a socialist government.

      Get your facts straight.

    • laughing says:

      02:58pm | 11/05/10

      Andrew….check your facts you clown….Alaskan citizens DO in fact get a cheque from the APF…too funny..self righteous idiot

    • Andrew says:

      06:22pm | 11/05/10

      BTW Laughing (or should I say) lying. Alaskan citizens receive between $600 - $1500 per YEAR (not month). It is paid from royalty payments which when taking into account other taxes total about 11%. Making Alaska (even when combined with all federal taxes) still a sh**load cheaper than doing business in Australia.

      Pull your head in!

    • Labor Dry says:

      08:36am | 11/05/10

      Oh for God’s sake, is this what we’ve come to? The solution to hollowmen is to have another hollowman offering more spin? . Peter, you really belong to the one trick pony club. And talk about taking us for mugs. Got to love the guile of someone who thinks he can shop the line “I’ve learned from my mistakes” and think he can get away with it. Remember mate, some of us live in NSW and can still remember this drivel of a line from the 2007 election. I reckon we’d all be better off if the likes of you stopped talking to Kevin.

    • Daniel says:

      08:38am | 11/05/10

      I think before writing Rudd off people need to remember this was the guy that got Labor re-elected after 10 years in the wilderness. AS much as I dont like the guy and think he is totally ignoring the Greens which he shouldnt be. He did get them into power.

    • Moggy says:

      11:46am | 11/05/10

      Daniel, once a PM becomes political poison he’s finished. There will be no re-incarnation of Rudd because the public in general loathe him. Then Gillard is a total PM no-go-zone because she was a member of the communist party! So who can Labor put forward to be their new PM. Swan is a dope, Tanner like Gillard is too left wing. It just goes to show that when you run out of spin you have to get real!!

    • JD says:

      08:50am | 11/05/10

      Dont forget folks, Its not just Rudd and Gillard. They have an entire party behind them throwing suggestions. These two are just the faces and voices of that party. They as a whole, are the ones that put us in the predicament we have today.
      A vote for labor, is a vote for communism. Dont believe me? check out some of their policies, and then go check out communist china policies…then tell me you dont believe.

    • Andy says:

      12:53pm | 11/05/10

      JD , don’t know if you or anyone else have visited China , I have and thoroughly enjoyed the country and the people , whom are very humble but dilligent and resourceful. I do not think it is worthwhile comparing nations , they are Chinese and we are “Australian” , whatever that is!
      Their Policies seem to be going very well , our policies , as is our Country , is still emerging. Hope you can visit China sometime , I love it and am returning soon, who knows , I may convert my currency one day and live in a peaceful and cultured country that whilst not perfect is looking a better prospect than where we are heading.

    • Sherekahn says:

      08:55am | 11/05/10

      I think before you give people this questionnaire on Rudd, you should ask them to fill it in regarding themselves then after collecting them, ask the same people to fill it in regarding Kevin Rudd!
      You will then have some knowledge of the intelligence of those that are “polled.”

    • Nevyn says:

      09:14am | 11/05/10

      Rudd lost my vote the instant Conroy tried to force internet censorship on the Australian people. The strange thing is even though Rudd has dumped so many other popular policies, he continues to push this unpopular and deeply flawed ideology. Rudd is not listening to the poeple of Australia, and a numberof young voters will be voting for the first time in the next election, I don’t think Rudd understands exactly how many votes internet cencorship will cost him.

    • MattLon says:

      04:45pm | 11/05/10

      I actually think you are onto something there.

      Talk to most 18-35 yo’s and ask them what is the biggest issue, it’s not the ETS or jobs that gets mentioned, it’s internet censorship.

      Rudd and Conroy have basically traded the young educated vote for that of the Australian Christian Lobby’s members.

      Absolute madness, they have alienated their future voters and the one demographic that supported them most at the last election.

    • TC says:

      06:14pm | 11/05/10

      You think that’s bad?
      I’m a smoker, a Telstra & mining co shareholder, and an internet user

    • AdamC says:

      09:31am | 11/05/10

      I don’t think Kruddy is a confected mea culpa away from getting back into the game. What he needs are some ideas and an agenda. This is what the budget is for. That is his last, best chance to retain some dignity.

      I say dignity rather than power. Despite his myriad stuff-ups and general crumminess, Dudd still has to do more to convince Aussies to dump him after only one term.  If he keeps going down this path, he will be returned, but with a thinner majority and the knives will be out.

      What is extraordinary is that this mob are showing all the political ineptitude that the Coalition did in the lead up to 2007, but they are still in their first term! That is a pretty rapid loss of touch, no? What is saving them is their novelty (people are still prepared to ‘give them a go’) and the media love fest that is continuing long after the popular honeymoon has ended. Julia Gillard is a lucky girl to have received such muted criticism for her BER debacle.

    • persephone says:

      10:40am | 11/05/10

      Well, I would remind you that all first term governments fair badly.

      Howard - after coming into power in a landslide - lost the popular vote at the next election.

    • Dash says:

      11:25am | 11/05/10

      Persephone, we’re not talking about “fairing badly” here. We’re talking about the worst government this country has ever had! Unemployment up, interest rates up, surplus blown, record levels of foreign debt, the insulation fiasco, the ETS backflip, fuel watch - fail, grocery choices election promise canned, parliamentary enquiries into school scheme rorts, removal of tax incentives for superannuation contribution, $43 billion not to deliver a national broadband network, lie about protecting the private health rebate, lie about more affordable housing, lie about “cheaper better childcare”, Backflip on election promise of childcare facilities, “no child shall live without a laptop”, “I’ll turn the boats around”. Come on, enough’s enough. Even you can’t be blinded by these failures surely?

    • Dash says:

      11:25am | 11/05/10

      Persephone, we’re not talking about “fairing badly” here. We’re talking about the worst government this country has ever had! Unemployment up, interest rates up, surplus blown, record levels of foreign debt, the insulation fiasco, the ETS backflip, fuel watch - fail, grocery choices election promise canned, parliamentary enquiries into school scheme rorts, removal of tax incentives for superannuation contribution, $43 billion not to deliver a national broadband network, lie about protecting the private health rebate, lie about more affordable housing, lie about “cheaper better childcare”, Backflip on election promise of childcare facilities, “no child shall live without a laptop”, “I’ll turn the boats around”. Come on, enough’s enough. Even you can’t be blinded by these failures surely?

    • luke09 says:

      12:59pm | 11/05/10

      persephone, the main problem with Rudd is has no substance, he has backdowned on ets, childcare centres, assylum seeker policy, whale hunting, grocery, fuel watch etc… He now cannot be trusted to deliver on anything he says, as he is only trying to gain the popular vote. He has lost the trust of many voters and now is political poison.

    • Hamish says:

      01:26pm | 11/05/10

      Perse, Howard had years of Labor mismanagement to fix in his first term. Austerity measures are never popular (look at Greece at the moment). Rudd’s had the weakest “recession” in Australian history (notwithstanding his attempts to call it the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression - everything has to be historic with this narcissistic clown) and has managed to get us into $140 billion worth of debt by sending out cheques, buying crappy pre-fab school halls and burning down a few houses.

      Krudd’s on the nose, in a similar way to Obama, because he promised change and a new direction and all he delivered was the same old Labor mismanagement, obfuscation and bureaucracy.

      In fact, this article is a classic example of the problems with this Labor government - ‘everything’s fine, we just need to develop some really good spin and everyone will love us again.’ No one’s buying anymore.

      They should still win, after all only two governments have lost office after one term. I mean, they’re not that bad…are they?

    • Peter Hatsworthy says:

      09:32am | 11/05/10

      Peter Lewis’ blueprint to make Kevin popular again fails on one key point - no one trusts him anymore. He’s proved himself to be a fraud which most of us have known since he came onto the scene, but the Canberra Press Gallery only just seem to be working out.

    • Jake says:

      09:50am | 11/05/10

      Rudd’s decisions on boat people and ETS have crystallised previously unarticulated suspicions about him. Thus the rapid, apparently irrational, switch in his poll perception.

    • James says:

      09:54am | 11/05/10

      Do we want Abbott instead?  I mean you would have to be pretty hard up for choice, to consider that nutcase for PM.

    • Stu says:

      03:28pm | 11/05/10

      Ahhh…..yes, according to about 95% of respondents so far. Rudd = spin, backflips, broken promises, botched hairbrained schemes and massive debt. A ‘nutcase’ or a clown - give me the nutcase please.

    • Willy K says:

      10:05am | 11/05/10

      Rudd is gone.  Dead in the water.  As is the ALP.

      When will Australians finally wake up to the fact that the public servants, union hacks and assorted student socialists that comprise the entire ALP are not fit or qualified to govern a country?  How many examples of failed Socialist/Labor govts both here and OS do you need to see before you realise this?

      People of that ilk are not fit to govern people let alone run a complex economy.

      The Coalition in a landslide.

    • Phil says:

      10:07am | 11/05/10

      Peter, your last three points.

      1. People would know that is fake. Surely the time to do this with credibility has passed. I dont know what you have to do to get the sack in labor, but surely Garrett deserved this if Rudd was genuine which we all know him not to be. However if the real persons responsible were Arbib and/or Rudd then that would explain why Peter was hung out to dry, his political career in tatters, and I doubt he can do a Lazaras as reserect this. Rudd has blood on his hands, sure some companies cut corners, but they could only see the rivers of gold put out to those who chose this path. As Tanner said they didnt have time to cross the T’s or dot the I’s, some dodgy contractors also took the governments path, now they have distroyed a previously viable industry.
      2. I agree with you, even though I do not support the legislation, nor a tax on carbon. I personally agree with solar power for homes, but unfortunately, this does not help his labor state mates who have sold off the silverware, and those unable to pay for its installation will be slugged with the higher costs by businesses, eager to retain their profits. Further, if they were serious they would at least look into Nuclear. Only 1 labor politician I am aware of supports research into this and its Simon Crean, who I dont particularly like, but seems like a genuine person (one of very few in the government)
      3. Now we know you are kidding and probably paid millions by the ALP to say this rubbish. Rudd has no spine other than the plasticy one he inherited whilst sleeping in the car. My 6 and 9 year old daughters could have spent and got better value than labor did in relation to the stimulus packages. The wastage from the BER could top 6 billion dollars or more. If labor were serious they would hold a real investigation, it might show billions were wasted, but they would at least have a chance at credibility with the public moving forward. You and I both know this will never happen. Rudd could win the gold medal in the olympics with the backflips he has managed over the past month or so.

      I personally feel that if they dump Rudd for Gillard and they will win the next election, as many women will vote for her because she is a woman, not because she posesses PM qualities, and I dont vote labor. WIth Gillard, its always the reds under the beds you have to worry about. As Garrett said before the last election to Steve Price in a Melbourne airport, it will all change after the election. He was one of the only honest ones there. The social engineering that has ensued under labor is further proof of this.

      As for policies, could you and all the labor hacks, name all Rudd’s policies in the arena which he did not amend prior to the election as at say March 2007? Come on you labor hacks, you complain about the libs having no policies, given Kevy got the top job at labor on Dec 4 and Abbott on Dec 1, not much difference really. They have a climate change proposal, some health proposals, a immigration policy, and they want to know the true state of the budget before announcing where they will go on ecomonic.

      Before the last election, Rudd copied most policies from Howard. If Abbott releases too many now they will again be copied by Labor. Kevin is struggling as he needs to think for himself, and with a bunch of trade unionists behind him, and very little of his cabinet with real world experience, this is showing up their primary school ideas.

      The main differences between the two is the libs run the country like a business and labor like a charity.

    • Cj says:

      10:19am | 11/05/10

      I think the problem is Kevin has too many people telling him what to say (or he’s just got so good at it he talks like he’s on auto-pilot). I’d like to see him actually say something for once that didn’t sound scripted.

      He could do a lot better in the polls if he didn’t talk the way he does. I mean, who says in relation to the mining super profits tax : “Yeah I think we’ve got it ‘about right.’” He talks like a schmuck.

    • Daryl says:

      10:27am | 11/05/10

      I think we need to be very careful putting too much emphasis on the leader. If they replace Rudd, it’s still the same old Labor party that’s failed to deliver over the last two years. They still have Swan and Gillard and Garrett. It’s still the team that’s delivered the insulation scheme, failed to deliver election promises (laptops, childcare facilities, grocery choices, fuelwatch, turn the boats around etc etc). To think replacing Rudd will change the party is ridiculous! Same with Abbott, there is more to the Liberal party than Tony Abbott. Vote for the party people, not it’s figure head. You can see by voting for the cardboard cut-out Rudd, what a big mistake that has been. Labor has failed us, Rudd was just their sales man.

    • Jane says:

      11:01am | 11/05/10

      Absolutely correct Daryl. The ALP and ALP media apologists want exactly this…for all blame to be sheeted home to Rud…so that when he ‘goes’ all blame and all ‘problems’ miraculously goes with him.
      Not true.

      This is LABOR’s debacle..LABOR’s incompetence…they own it..as an entity….and THAT is what needs to be emphasised.

      Rudd was Gillard’s trojan Horse…..and their ‘plan’ is unfolding so long as we are duped that Rudd is the ‘problem’....just as he was supposedly..the ‘answer’. They used him for manipulative benefit..‘whatever it takes’....as something to hide behind, a false facade, to get elected…and something to sacrifice when his use by date inevitably arrives.
      Don’t be fooled.

    • Comedian says:

      10:34am | 11/05/10

      All Abbott and his party need to do is stay away from peoples working rights and conditions and he will win the election and each election after that…BACK OFF and you’re a shoe.

    • Dash says:

      11:10am | 11/05/10

      I agree with you, but remember the unemployment rate was at generational lows under the previous government and the unemployment rate has increased since Labor came to power. The Workchoices scare campaign was about Union power, not about creating jobs for “working families”.

    • David Rees says:

      10:47am | 11/05/10

      Look at the rest of the world and we can see that Socialism doesn’t work.
      Carn’t we learn from this.?
      Time to get our economy back in good shape, and its definatly not the Labor Party that will do this.

    • A Bob says:

      12:18pm | 11/05/10

      Oh, for goodness sake. Labor hasn’t been socialist for donkeys years. And Abbotts maternity leave idea has a more socialist smell than Labors.

      Times are confusing, none of the stereotypes apply.

    • Alan says:

      10:52am | 11/05/10

      The issue I have is if Krudd and the Mad Monk are the best that the two major parties can put forward then what does that say for the rest of the halfwits in Canberra? Gillard certainly hasn’t been successful at anything other than keeping Krudd’s chair warn when he’s off on a jaunt and Bishop’s a complete empty head. I think I’m going to vote for a millitary dictatorship, we couldn’t be any worse off.

    • stu says:

      05:29pm | 11/05/10

      Just don’t vote Greens or you’ll be voting Labor through the back door. More power to the Independents I say.

    • Jeff says:

      11:02am | 11/05/10

      When going to the poles I hope Australian’s will remember the results from Tasmania, South Australia and probably the UK elections. If you want a change of government, don’t vote the Greens etc. Vote for the Liberals. It’s a real shame that the majority of people in these elections did not or will not get the government they wanted.

    • Rhys says:

      11:11am | 11/05/10

      You can still vote the greens, but just make sure you put the libs above labor. Why does it seem like nobody understands preferential voting and that voting for greens will “send your preferences to labor”.

      Everyone should make an effort to vote below the line in the senate too.

    • Randal says:

      11:03am | 11/05/10

      Peter, I think the PM has already tried the ‘mea culpa’ route and the people worked out pretty quickly that it was just more spin, so I doubt he well head down that road again.

      The problem is that the ‘scales have fallen’ from the eyes of the public and they simply do not believe anything Kevin has to say, he has lost the trust of the Australian people, and that is something that can be very difficult to win back.

      No matter what is released in the budget, or announced during the campaign, the public will take it as a grain of salt - this is the punishment for failing to successfully implement a single major policy from those promised in the 2007 election.

      The game is not over of course and Abbott at this stage is not picking up support and is still a polarising figure, giving Rudd the chance to stabilise, but any further flips, back downs, or policy implementation disasters and it will be over for Rudd, and he will no one to blame but himself as it has been through his leadership failings that he has given the other side a chance at victory - a chance that seemed a fantasy just 6 months ago.

    • Dietrich Bonhoeffer says:

      11:04am | 11/05/10

      Put it this way - I’m rolling in my grave.

    • acker says:

      11:05am | 11/05/10

      I note Rudd was at his most popular when his plane was stuck at Windorah building a stand alone solar power plant swatting fly’s drinking beer. I suggest he does an outback tour Hay, Broken Hill, Tiborburra, Cunnamulla, Blackall..etc to show he is staying in touch.

    • Chris says:

      11:22am | 11/05/10

      This whole situation has revealed the individuals amongst my friends that are completely unreasonable and one eyed Labor supporters. One would have to be to defend this indefensible Government.

      I am a centrist who got sucked in by Rudd at the last election. I guess it was because I still had hope, but I will not be fooled by the false hope of left wing politics ever again.

      Better the devil you know, I am voting Liberal at the next election.

    • Rod J'That says:

      11:34am | 11/05/10

      Spot on.

    • Chris M says:

      12:01pm | 11/05/10

      Cannot agree more Chris. I know a few like this and it is due to them being indoctrinated with the Labor ideals mainly by their parents. I have actually had acquaintances say that you don’t choose your political opinions, they are given to you by your parents and that is that. Sounds terrible but it’s true. This same person then says to me that it’s up to her children what religion they would like to choose though. wtf is going on there hey?? Choose whatever religion you like, but this family votes Labor - because that’s what we do.

    • WayneT says:

      02:55pm | 11/05/10

      I would like to know how the first time voters from the last election now feel about their choice.  They grew up only knowing a liberal government and never experiencing a Labor one as their parents had.  Do they think they made a good choice last time, will they be changing their vote come next election?

    • Colin Campbell says:

      11:24am | 11/05/10

      Time for Peter Costello?

    • Dash says:

      11:32am | 11/05/10

      Great idea Colin. Maybe the Libs should do what Labor did in 1982 and replace the leader on the eve of the election?

    • Comedian says:

      11:54am | 11/05/10

      Noooooooooooooooo….....I would rather pash my mother in-law

    • Jim says:

      11:25am | 11/05/10

      As far back as the Keating/Hawke days I’ve had a very poor opinion of the Labour Party. The way they squabbled and politicised everything I just took as them being childish. And as much as I think Kim Beazley was probably a genuinely nice guy, he was no match for the bickering and bullying within his own ranks. Fast forward to 2007, KRudd gets in on the back of a beat-up about what John Howards intentions were with regards to his retirement, and a phoney apology. Yes, phoney, sure he made it sound sincere…but he used it to win over the young do-gooders of this country. Nothing has really improved for the indigenous population has it? His first few months were full of promises and hot air and people were still basking in the change (and hand-outs) and what could lie in the future (more hand-outs perhaps?) then along came the swine flu. Now up to this point KRudd had his mug in front of every camera and microphone he could see. Where was he when Nicola Roxon was facing the media everyday with the “bad news”? He was nowhere to be seen. At about the same time I started working on a unionised site. I quickly learned that the unions lie, deceive, cheat, steal, and talk with some weird ideology that contains very little if any logic. Where do the Labour Party come from? Oh yes, unions. The unions of this country ahve been driving jobs and business offshore now for 30 years with their spurious demands, they just won’t pull their heads out of the sand and acknowledge that fact. Now the Labour Party is intent on driving investment offshore. Face it, KRudd and the Labour Party are ruining this country…ideology might make you feel warm and fuzzy, and dodging the hard stuff when it suits might give you a false sense of comfort, but it doesn’t help pay back over $200 Billion…

    • Hamish says:

      03:58pm | 11/05/10

      Jim,

      It never ceases to amaze me how people don’t realise the extent of Union control in the Labor Party. The Labor Party is staffed by Unions, funded by Unions, for Unions. Unions aren’t Marxists or even socialists really, they’re basically an organised theft movement.

      It’s like the WorkChoices thing. The Labor Party (with the help of massive Union financing) argued that WorkChioces were bad for employees and no doubt I understand there were some aspects which worried people (not that anyone really understood how it was going to affect them), but all Labor’s changes have achieved is to buy Unions back into the game. Don’t want a Union bargaining for you? Tough. Don’t want Unions to have access to your workplace or business even if there are no Union members? Tough. Happy to negotiate with your employer over your specific individual situation? Tough.

      If you’re not a Union member, why on earth would you vote for the Labor Party?

    • Saskia says:

      11:28am | 11/05/10

      Rudd’s Record:

      GFC Response:  Far too much money and poor targeting saw the majority go straight OS.  FAIL

      Interest Rates:  6 straight increases.  FAIL

      Fuel Watch/Grocery Watch:  Utterly useless.  FAIL

      My School Site:  Some Potential but already has been rigged.  C MINUS

      Insulation program:  Deaths, destruction, rorting.  EPIC FAIL (still awaiting Lettergate)

      BER:  Rorting like we have never seen with non-existent management. EPIC FAIL

      Border Protection:  Leaks like a sieve, seen as incredibly weak in Asia, UN has deplored Rudd’s policies resulting in 50 + deaths to date.  EPIC FAIL

      Fiscal Policy:  All time record debt in just over 2 years.  Conservative??  Biggest joke Rudd has told yet.  EPIC FAIL

      ETS:  ‘Greatest moral issue of our time’.  Squibbed in weeks after Copenhagen.  Even though AGW and ETS are both scams, shows the utter cowardice of the hollowman of hollowmen.  EPIC FAIL

      Tax Review:  Sat on for months then implemented nothing but the very things that will destroy the economy.  A tax so regressive and punitive it is hard to comprehend an Australia PM could even think of it let alone attempt to ram it through.  EPIC FAIL

      Housing Crisis:  A few committees and reports.  EPIC FAIL

      Population Issue:  Believes in a ‘Big’ Australia then says ‘has no view’.  Still has no idea. (Still waiting for the poll I guess).  EPIC FAIL

      Water Security/Murray:  Another Rudd/Wong non-event.  A disgrace.  EPIC FAIL

      2020 Summit:  Obscene lefty talkfest that cost US millions and has achieved Sweet Jack All.  EPIC FAIL.

      Please feel free to add.  I know I have missed many other items.

      There is simply no doubt that the Rudd Government has been the most incompetent and damaging to Australia in our history.

      The list of Rudd’s private abusive, bizarre and aggressive behaviour is even longer.

    • Willy K says:

      12:01pm | 11/05/10

      Aboriginal Issues:  Apologized on behalf of Australian actions almost half a century ago for something that didn’t actually happen!  Then has built about 3 houses in 3 years and is dismantling the systems Howard put in place to protect kids from abuse, drugs, alcohol, poverty and systematic rape.  EPIC FAIL.

    • Greg says:

      12:22pm | 11/05/10

      1.  2020 summit, cost over $2m, 9 useable ideas, nothing delivered.
      2.  Save the whales – FAIL
      3.  Fight Inflation Genie – Oops GFC
      4.  Taxes up (Gas, Diesel, Transport, Alco pops) – inflationary
      5.  Fuelwatch - cost $21 million – FAIL
      6.  Grocery Watch/Choice – June, 2009 abandoned $13 million election promise – FAIL
      7.  Laptops - still not delivered
      8.  National Broadband Network cost increased from $4b, to $7b to $43 billion
      9.  Cash Splash 1 – borrowed
      10.  Cash Splash 2 – also borrowed = $42 billion
      11 Work Choices /Fair work – Unemployment rate up
      12.  Immigration/Refugees/Asylum Seekers how many boats so far? Need I even mention the Oceanic Viking?
      13.  The buck stops with me – so where are you?
      14.  Securing water on the Murray/Darling - Fail
      15.  IVF Program – cuts - the caring for working families ALP.
      16.  Medicare/Private Health – rebate not to be touched - key election promise - outright lie
      17.  Dental Scheme – gone – the caring ALP
      18.  Superannuation – the government needs it more than you.
      19. More affordable housing - prices set to rise 20% - Fail
      20.  260 Childcare Centres - election promise scrapped
      21.  No compulsory University Union Fees – an outright lie voted down
      22.  Carbon emissions reduction - LPG conversion subsidies phased out
      23.  Carbon Emissions reduction Part 2 - Household Solar Rebate axed 9/6
      24.  Schools Stimulus/? Infrastructure Program – Subject to AG inquiry.
      25.  Reduce consultancies by $112 million = increase to $800 million 26.  No nuclear Waste Dump NT – election promise – broken June 2008
      27.  $15 million to rural research & development corporations – election promise – broken May 2008.
      28.  Boost funding for aboriginal Legal Aid – lie – actuality = cuts to funding in first budget.
      29.  Homes /renovations for indigenous – not one shovel lifted to date
      30.  Cheaper Better Childcare – Govt regulations will see Childcare costs going up by about $1500pa on July 1, 2010
      31.  Cheaper Books for Australians – back flip to protectionist policies
      32.  ETS, Versions 1&2;–FAIL senate.
      33.  Copenhagen conference - EPIC FAIL – CLASSIC COMEDY

    • Christian Real says:

      02:09pm | 11/05/10

      Wiley K
      It appears that you are echoing typical Liberal diatribe and spin, it must be inbred into imbeciles like you.
      The stolen generation was real, and it did happen and all the Liberal spin that you and others throw up is not going to change that fact.
      Howard’s intervention in the Northern Territory, was a cheap political stunt, racism at it’s worst, in a blatant attempt to win votes, when there are drugs,alcohol, poverty and systematic rape in your white fella’s society as well.
      It appears that the only thing that has failed you Willy K is your brain, it appears to have gone walkabout.

    • JR says:

      02:17pm | 11/05/10

      Taking the Iranian leadership to the international court.

    • Please get rid of him says:

      02:46pm | 11/05/10

      Fantastic lists Saskia and Greg!  Well put!  It is hard to argue that this guy has done a good job when you read those lists.  And Christian Real, I’m sorry, but this is not just Liberal spin.  It is pretty much fact and on the public record.

    • Dash says:

      02:54pm | 11/05/10

      Yes but Christian, Aboriginal children are still being taken away from their families today as they have been in the past? Where’s the difference? And the point is that saying sorry did not improve the living standards of one single aboriginal child in this country. If sorry day wasn’t a cheap political stunt, what is? At least Howard’s “stunt” put police on the streets in an attempt to protect children. And I agree with you. We should have one welfare system for all. Not one for Aboriginies and a different one for everyone else.

    • Randal says:

      03:09pm | 11/05/10

      Lets not forget:

      Green Loans - Promised 2007 election then scrapped =  FAIL

      Green Cards - Sent, then not sent, then scrapped altogether = FAIL

      Green Inspections - Inundated with rip-off’s - scrapped = FAIL

      Health Reform - End blame game/ ‘The buck stops
      with me’/Less Bureaucracy becomes redirection of the GST/ States retain complete control/5th layer of bureaucracy added - Nobody knows where the buck stops = FAIL

      Failing to implement one single succesful policy = EPIC FAIL

      So what the hell has he been doing for the past two and half years… The Australian people should demand their money back from the smug millionaire from Queensland.

    • Joombi O'Flaherty says:

      07:29pm | 11/05/10

      Abbott’s record:
      GFC response: well, um, we woulda, we woulda.. not spent…well, um we would done something quite different.. FAIL

      Interest rates: no discernible policy but believed to be linked to 9 consecutive increases prior last election…FAIL

      Fuel watch/ Grocery watch: No stated policy, but given his party included food in GST, is believed to favour higher prices for all consumer goods…FAIL

      My school site: No stated policy - believed to favour increasing private school funding over stae system… FAIL


      Insulation program: No discernible policy..FAIL

      BER: No stated policy, no alternatives offered…FAIL

      Border Protection: Believed to favour using Navy to sink all approaching ships…FAIL

      Fiscal Policy: No stated policies as yet…FAIL


      ETS: Believe to believe in the problem, no wait, changed mind, now doesn’t believe, but will bring in counter measures anyway, just to0 show he cares…..EPIC FAIL

      Tax review: No policies stated, implied or planned…EPIC FAIL

      Housing crisis: Believed to have done quite nicely thank you from Howard gummit’s policy of increased housing values, but no policy announced…FAIL

      Population issue: As an avowed abortion hater, is believed to be at the heart of the out-of-control population boom…FAIL

      Water security: Did nothing in 12 years in power…FAIL

      2020 summit: No policy on future of country implied, announced or stated….EPIC FAIL

    • cybacaT says:

      11:31am | 11/05/10

      Rudd has been a dud - it’s just taken time for more and more people to realise it.  Only the very slowest of learners are still backing him.

      It cracks me up that the only attack being made about Abbott is that he’s opposing and negative.  If he didn’t oppose Rudd’s stupid policies and actions then he’d be equally to blame!  What’s his job title again?  OPPOSITION leader!

    • JW says:

      11:48am | 11/05/10

      If Julia Gillard gets in I shall have to emigrate smile

      Not because if policies you understand, as it is hard to know what she stands for apart from “What Kevin said” but to get away from that horrible nasally annoying voice *shudder*

    • Baz says:

      11:51am | 11/05/10

      Everyone talking about Abbott having no policies. Well hasnt Rudd shown us it doesnt matter if you have policies, they are just what you say to get elected?

    • demeter says:

      11:58am | 11/05/10

      The funny thing is I dare say that the swing to the Libs isnt going be enough in the key seats. Labour will get in with a reduced majority and keep on doing the good work that the Australia people want the ALP to do.

    • Chris says:

      12:01pm | 11/05/10

      Dear Everyone,

      Please learn what Socialism is.  It doesn’t make sense when cray Americans use it, so it isn’t making sense when you copy it. Stop it. Just stop.

    • A Bob says:

      12:24pm | 11/05/10

      What he said.

      It’s bad enough hearing Americans parrot Fox News. Its even more stupid when Australians do it.

      Both our major parties have been fighting for the centre for decades now with just a bit of old-style rhetoric thrown in now and then to keep in touch with their traditional base.

    • Madeleine says:

      02:02pm | 11/05/10

      Agreed. Same goes for Fascism and Communism.

    • Saskia says:

      04:42pm | 11/05/10

      I know exactly what Socialism is.  Rudd’s Mining tax is Socialism 101. 

      Just as his Internet filter is Communism/Facism 101.

      Fact.

    • Charlie says:

      12:06pm | 11/05/10

      Kevin Rudd is doing the wrong things in improving housing affordability, Tony is dodging it. I’ll vote for anyone who adopts Ken Henry review’s recommendation 14: investment property gets 40% tax discount regardless it is a positive or negative income.

    • Passing Wind says:

      12:18pm | 11/05/10

      With a bit of luck Captain KRudd from the planet Smirk will join Gordon Brown and resign.

      He’d better be careful,  what with all those slaps on the back by Gillard and Co, There ar knives in them thar hills.

      Either way, apart from Persephone, T. Chon and a few others, no one is going to miss him. His place in history is marred by a big black hole full of taxpayers money.

    • DENESE says:

      12:25pm | 11/05/10

      Yes that kevin is normal and tone is a radical right that would change the way we llive with his mad ideas on MORALS and now going into schools just this week and telling our little kiddies that it was hotter in jesus
      TIME WAS HE THERE I wonder.

      Give me kevin any time

    • Passing Wind says:

      11:15pm | 11/05/10

      Check out Andrew Bolt’s blog. You’ll find some interesting facts about the climate around the birth of Christ. Facts I didn’t know about and obviously neither did you.

    • Peter says:

      12:26pm | 11/05/10

      One thing i agree with Rudd on is the mining tax. Those minerals belong to all of us and a regular company tax for miners is unacceptable. It is not socialism to get a fair share of a resource we own, not the miners.. Even if we did lose a few projects, we don’t want our economy to overheat and if the boom goes unabated, these miners are going to need overseas workers and then we’ll have people complaining about population.. I wouldn’t fear a few project not going ahead.

    • Wayne Thomas says:

      03:21pm | 11/05/10

      Then why doesn’t the Australian Government dig them up and process it themselves? If we didn’t have these companies digging this stuff up, processing and selling it overseas, it would still sit in the ground benefiting zero Australians.  Until this country has the guts to start up its own National Mining & Offshore Company, then we will have to attract foreign and domestic investors to help dig up the resources so that we as Australians gain some benefit from it.  Because just sitting in the ground helps no one.

    • Jim says:

      06:18pm | 11/05/10

      You really have no idea, do you Peter. Yeah the stuff’s in the ground so it “must” belong to all Australians…3 cheers. Most of the mining money is tied up in investments…it costs billions to build a plant and start a mine, and it’s usually decades before payback is achieved. Any money earned is slapped with a 30% company tax, then the states take between 8 and 11% in royalties. Now what’s left will be taxed at 40%. So what do you think will happen? All those foreign investors and superannuation companies that have invested in Australia - face it, there’s not enough money in Australia to keep the mining industry afloat - will pull out. The value of the miners will crash, and the rest of the market will follow oooh, a day later? Billions of dollars are pumped into the economy each year by mining companies. If you believe KRudd will use this money as he stated you are a fool. The $9 billion a year will not even cover the interest on the debt he has accrued.

    • Angie says:

      12:47pm | 11/05/10

      Tony is great - look forward to straight talking, budgetary discipline and letting the private sector flourish again.

      Bye bye Dudd, Goose and Commie Jules.

    • Dan says:

      12:47pm | 11/05/10

      Peter says: 09:14am | 11/05/10, Peter you must be kidding mate, I can’t believe you can still have faith in these idiots. By the way Pete, Australia was never in a financial crisis to start with, all this incompetent labor government did was pissed our money up against the wall.

    • Ray says:

      12:59pm | 11/05/10

      For Kevin, this could start along the following lines:

      - I am devastated that our efforts to keep the economy moving in tough times led to the death of young Australians. That loss weighs heavily on me. After all, we should have foreseen the flagrant flouting of laws by greedy businesses who were quick to risk the lives of their own staff to cash in on anything they could have. Moreover, we should have been on-hand at every single installation to ensure full compliance and the safety of every one of those tens-of-thousands of installations around Australia. Sorry we could not find a way to divide ourselves without spending a lot more public money hiring inspectors to watch everyone day and night.

      There, I fixed it for you.

    • Bob says:

      01:14pm | 11/05/10

      I told you so…

    • John Allen says:

      01:17pm | 11/05/10

      Our competitors were extremely miffed that we failed to commit Hari-kari with our ETS foolishness, but are now smiling again as Kamakazi Kevin continues his loops, taking us on a national death dive.

      Kev believes in Anthropogenic Global Warming just as much as he believes in Santa Claus.  It was to suck in the gullible and impressionable.

      Assume crash positions folks!

    • Christian Real says:

      01:25pm | 11/05/10

      Ray,
      Kevin Rudd was not responsible for the deaths of young Australians as you falsely claim.  To say so as you have, is defamation of his character, and to have written it as you have, is Libel.
      Try putting the blame where it really lies, with the businesses and contractors that hired these people, and whose responsibility it was to train them and endsure that their workers had a safe place to work in.
      Typical liberal spin, echoing Abbott’s diatribe and lies.

    • Dash says:

      02:20pm | 11/05/10

      Christian, no need to defame Rudd, he does a splendid job of it himself. Also, the government botched up the insulation scheme no matter how you look at it. They didn’t put the neccessary checks and balances in place. They didn’t provide adequate control over the businesses and contractors. The scheme was full of dodgy workmanship and rorting as a result. You could argue that if the government correctly managed the situation, people would not have lost their lives and homes would not have burnt down. It was a government funded (i.e. tax payers) scheme, they should take and accept responsibility. That’s what taxpayers would expect as a minimum. You can set up a free-for-all and then walk away and wash your hands can you?

    • Try Harder says:

      02:48pm | 11/05/10

      Oh for Pete’s sake, Dash.

      Your lot like to yap on and on about individual responsibity. But when it comes down to *taking* it, your lot are always on the look out for some cutesy sanctimonious way to blame some other bloke.

      Get it right: it was dodgy small business who did the rorting. It was dodgy small business who put their own workers at risk. Dodgy small business put some houses at fire risk and electrical risk. 

      Despite safeguards and building regs. And despite all that we still got a milllion houses insualted that would’ve taken years otherwise.

      And your answer? Not the fault of the Dodgy Bruvvers of small business at all. Oh no. Somehow, Why, it just musta been the dadgum gummints fault.  Sure, son. Sure.

    • notsurprised says:

      03:18pm | 11/05/10

      I seem to remember the comment “The buck stops with me”  coming from the Prime Minister. Christian, you can’t explain away the four letters on this topic held under ‘Cabinet in Confidence’. There are reports that the Prime Minister was warned of the danger before and after the first insulation death.

    • Willy K says:

      03:44pm | 11/05/10

      Rudd personally set up a scheme so dodgy, so utterly lacking in risk management that it was directly responsible for 4 deaths and countless destruction.  The scheme was rushed through in a sickening attempt to be popular and to be ‘seen’ to be acting on something.

      And still this grub will not take any responsibility and is covering up ‘Lettergate’.

      Howard boldly took Australia into the war zone of Iraq to support our major Ally the US and at the cost of his own popularity. We lost one serviceman, who tragically was probably killed due to his own error.  Howard acknowledged the risk the entire way and showed great empathy for this young man.

      Compare the two and you have a stark contrast. And still the Labor rusted-ons defend the indefensible.

      Rudd: there is not a ounce of conviction, decency, truth or honour in his body.

    • Dash says:

      03:53pm | 11/05/10

      So what “Try Harder”, our government can throw taxpayers money into schemes and then not have any responsibility for how that scheme is run? Are you crazy? We’re in a situation now where your taxes and my taxes are paying to repair the damage! Sorry but as a significant tax payer, I want my government to be held responsible for how it is spent. And I’m sick of the Labor party looking for scapegoats. It was the government who allowed dodgy business to mis-use our money! Why aren’t they getting the dodgy businesses to compensate the taxpayer?

    • Please get rid of him says:

      01:26pm | 11/05/10

      I once had a boss exactly like Kevin Rudd.  He was a CEO of a local council and, like a lot of government jobs, he got the CEO role because his last council desparately wanted to get rid of him.  As managers we spent to whole time preparing reports to council to make it look as though we were doing everything when, in fact, we were spending all our time writing reports to make him look good.  He was quite decisive, however, his decision were not through and they were not made after appropriate consultation.  He often changed his mind after making the rash decisions and we, as managers, were left to pick up the pieces.  He basically worked 24 hours a day and, in my time, at the council, we lost every manager because he was impossible to work with.  From all the reports coming out, Kevin Rudd appears to be exactly the same.  He is not managing for the good of this country, he is managing for his own popularity and does not think through the full impact of his policies.  Ultimately that will not last and, slowly, the Australian public are beginning to see it.  The Labor party should quickly change leaders if they have any hope of winning the next election and get back to governing for the people, not for themselves.  Oh, and ultimately the councillors saw through my CEOs sham of promising much and delivering little and he was sacked.  Unfortunately not before a lot of good people had left to work elsewhere.

    • D.A. says:

      01:35pm | 11/05/10

      when was this guy ever competent, he got the biggest armchair ride in history from a media that believed his crap, he signed Kyoto, this did not achieve anything he apologised to the sto;en generations which amounted to nothing more than hollow words,  he gave away billions of dollars which kept him popular, when the time came to make a stand he let everyone down. well done Kev.

    • Against the Man says:

      02:30pm | 11/05/10

      Well said DA! I believe Kevin Rudd only cares for himself and looks out for his own interests. He provides the illusion of a hard working, tough as nails PM but with his lack of policy results, contant sacrificing of his ministers to cover his own mistakes and spend, spend, spend attitude the public have realised what a phony he truly is.

    • Shelley says:

      01:51pm | 11/05/10

      Don’t even write Kevin and sorry in jest or we’ll have another empty Sorry. My bad. Sorry. moment from the lying and incompetent PM Rudd.

    • Ceejay says:

      02:44pm | 11/05/10

      I voted Labor thinking Rudd would be a good Prime Minister. He has backflipped more than an Olympic gymnast. I can’t stand the thought of Tony Abbott running the country but I won’t vote Labor while Rudd remains leader. It’s time for Gillard to take over.

    • Daryl says:

      04:26pm | 11/05/10

      Ceejay, you vote for the party not the leader. Don’t get sucked into that kind of cosmetic change. It will still be the same old Labor party that has failed this nation for the last 2 years.

    • Peter says:

      02:55pm | 11/05/10

      The only thing Rudd and Labor have been competent at is being liars and spin masters. They certainly are a disaster. Labor is now known as the disaster party from the NSW Labor disaster to the Federal Labor disaster.

    • Jonno M says:

      03:09pm | 11/05/10

      I think Combet should give it a shot.

    • Joseph says:

      03:48pm | 11/05/10

      Rudd has shown his inability to run our country.Except for lindsay TANNER AND jULIA gILLARD THE REST OF HIS TEAM IS B GRADE.
      At least we had a good economy with Howard even if we did have work choices.Rudd has been a disaster!

    • Brad says:

      03:58pm | 11/05/10

      he was NEVER competant…... he was just a masisve CON ARTIST, that unfortunatly too many people were conned by and are now paying for their blind faith and inability to qestion just how this bloke was actually going to deliver all of the wonderful things he promised…... remeber if it is too good to be true it usually is!!!!

      If Kevin was a SME he would the number 1 dodgy businessman target for both Today Tonight and ACA!!!!

    • Mike Creighton says:

      04:17pm | 11/05/10

      For me the rot started with the Bill Henson controversy.  Deriding the work of this significant Australian artist as “disgusting” or “appalling” or some crap without even having seen it made me begin to suspect that the Kruddbot is just another dangerous, weird, creepy little godbothering philistine nutter from the backblocks of somewhere or other.

    • notsurprised says:

      04:22pm | 11/05/10

      Everyone knows Kevin Rudd is useless but what is more scary is that Julia Gillard could possibly become the next PM. She was just on the radio saying something like, “When. yoyu. go. and. hairve. a. loyk. on. the. websoyt…” Arrrrrgh.  Imagine the President of the USA speaking fluent trailer park or the Prime Minister of England speaking in rough scouse, it just wouldn’t happen. Speaking with foreign dignitaries on the global scene would go something like, “Helloyu. noice. to. meet .yoyu, woyie. shouyld. werk. toygetha. on. sarm. initiartives. “, Arrrrgh.

    • Ray Hunt says:

      04:35pm | 11/05/10

      Actions speak louder than words.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      04:38pm | 11/05/10

      Labor and Liberals- NFI.

    • Henry says:

      07:01pm | 11/05/10

      Let me guess…. you are a Labor voter that pretends to be a swinging voter?

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      08:07pm | 11/05/10

      No I hate both equally. But don’t let me stop anyone’s ranting….

    • Radical Chick says:

      04:44pm | 11/05/10

      Rudd is the worst PM because he stands for nothing…Vote Abbott his team is worth it.  Rudd has lied to Australia and is a self-absorbed technocrat….not a leader in the least.

    • Kate says:

      05:12pm | 11/05/10

      Johnno M .......COMBET ????? Are you serious?

      From Wikipedia:
      Greg Combet was born in Sydney and attended Baulkham Hills High School. He was later educated at the Universities of New South Wales and Sydney, where he studied engineering, economics and labour relations. He was a project officer for the New South Wales Tenants’ Union before working for the Lidcombe Workers’ Health Centre. In 1987, he was employed by the Waterside Workers’ Federation (now part of the Maritime Union of Australia).
      Combet’s association with the ACTU began in 1993 when he became a Senior Industrial Officer. In 1996 he was elected Assistant Secretary, and in 2000, following the retirement of Bill Kelty, he became Secretary. Over his time at the ACTU, Combet has co-ordinated many union campaigns, including the 1998 Australian waterfront dispute in which he rose to prominence, as well as campaigns to secure entitlements and compensation for the staff of the collapsed airline Ansett Australia and asbestos victims of the James Hardie company. In his capacity as Secretary of the ACTU, Combet led the campaign against the Howard Government’s industrial relations law changes.

      WHAT A BACKGROUND???? Perfect to run a $1 Trillion economy.

      Look into background of Lib/Nats…..company directors, financiers, finance directors, accountants, lawyers…....may have some idea of business.

    • Jim says:

      06:23pm | 11/05/10

      Sadly Kate, most KRudd lovers were still dribbling there Ovaltine during the waterfront revolt. Union guys at picket lines with their kids who were terrified, assaults, death threats, blatant corruption…yeah Combet’s the man. Another example of unions driving business and jobs offshore.

    • ByeKev747 says:

      05:17pm | 11/05/10

      To be fair, I think Krudd wanted to make Australia better, but had neither the nouse, courage or brains to pull it off. None of his techniques seemed to work, and his staffers and fellow front-bench clowns let him down. If he knew what he was doing he would have rejected the ETS day one and not try to socialise everything. The hospital grab was a last ditch attempt at socialising much of our medicine and fell at the first hurdle.

    • peter of cherrybrook says:

      05:30pm | 11/05/10

      I noticed in question time today that no sooner had the opposition asked about pink batts, Julia was on her feet and dissapeared from camera view. She returned after Kevin mumbled some type of lame response.

    • Andrew says:

      06:36pm | 11/05/10

      Does no-one realise that deficit spending is the greatest wealth redistribution tool available to government?

      There are 2 ways to redistribute wealth via deficit spending:

      1. Borrow money from overseas, increasing bond spreads, making your currency weaker. Hey presto, Mr Rich just got poorer.
      2. Increase currency (print more money). Just have a look at what the Obama admin did in the states. Only problem here is that the rich (read in credit) foreigners who bought your bonds no longer will buy any more because you keep causing your currency to devalue. Hey presto, currency dumped, worth less. purchasing power parity destroyed.

      Oh yeah and then there’s number 3, spend spend spend and them tell everyone that your successful rich industries haven’t been carrying their weight. Solution quasi-nationalisation. Thank you Kevin Chavez Rudd and the whole Labor machine.

      There’s a reason they call it labor.

    • Diamantina Dick says:

      06:47pm | 11/05/10

      Time to remind people of this from a year ago:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nT5lQBcIo3s

      The inability for Arbib to explain this ridiculous policy made on the back of an envolope was simply that he had a bad day. Not that the policy was dopey, stupid and overhyped, simply that he failed to spin it. Even in the last weeks, they have been saying that there was nothing wrong with the policies, simply that the announcements did not go well. Spin harder boys.

      This Government measures their performance on the quality of the spin nothing else. I don not believe they are capable of change and therefore they will be gone.

    • Against the Man says:

      07:19pm | 11/05/10

      Arbib is a mindless mouth piece for his Master KRudd. One of my biggest disappointment w/ Labor/Rudd is the lack of good policy ideas that are implementable and sustainable. Look at health - billions of dollars on a real cut and paste plan. Same w/ the ETS - I don’t think anyone even labor party members understood the logic behind that policy. It seems like they have a bright idea, throw money to make it happen, realise it was a dud plan and abandon it. No thought or analysis at all.

    • Simon says:

      06:55pm | 11/05/10

      Why doesn’t Persephone tell the PM what Labor stands for rather than us, I don’t know if she’s humiliating Rudd or Rudds ashamed of her politics, either way the only place for such a true believer must be the caucus right!

    • Joombi O'Flaherty says:

      06:57pm | 11/05/10

      My first ‘encounter’ with Tony Abbott was when he was on Ch9’s Today programme. Even then he was all smoke’n’mirrors. He has had himself promoted as being all things to all people. He is desperate to be liked but would prefer to be loved. The Liberal’s mistake has been that they are more concerned with selecting so-called Celebrity Candidates rather than people of substance, ability. They are ham-strung because other than theses vapid celebs they are tied to getting their candidates from, the most part, within the ranks of their own Pollie Staffers. Pre-selection is a reward for senior staffers who have reached their “use By” dates within their little fiefdoms. It is no secret that those running the Liberals behind the scenes decide who they want pre-selected and often simply present their candidate to the branches and tell them “this is the woman/man who is going to be your candidate”. That is democracy Liberal-style. Abbott will never do a mea culpa for then he really would be branded a self-criticising apparatchik of the old USA, modern fascist Germany mold

    • visia says:

      10:13pm | 11/05/10

      The truth is labor = liberal.
      Both parties fail.
      Both parties make empty promises in election mode and then put the interests of the corporates first. The fact is our country is run by people whose primary goal is reelected to maintain power and control.

      I don’t know what the solution is.
      I just know our political system is not working and most Australians are in complete and total apathy. There is so much waste through local, state and federal govts while many Australians are desperately struggling. Meanwhile incompetent fools are ruining this country into the ground.

    • No More says:

      11:09pm | 11/05/10

      Labor = More Tax

      If you like tax you like Labor

    • murdoch overtime says:

      04:06am | 12/05/10

      Admit it, youre an idiot if you vote labor now.

    • PauL says:

      08:12am | 12/05/10

      Your an idiot if you don’t. Labor always makes the hard decisions and does the hard yards while Liberals float along on their coat tails. All the Howard years were spent taking advantage of what Keating and Hawke put in place.

    • notsurprised says:

      08:37am | 12/05/10

      Paul, in case you haven’t noticed, Kevin Rudd has backed down from most of the difficult positions in front of him. “..The hard yards”? “..Float along on coat tails”? Are you feeling ok? The hard yards are them struggling against their own incompetence. Please read this next sentence clearly - This administration cannot lead. However it’s your last comment that takes the prize, “All the Howard years were spent taking advantage of what Keating and Hawke put in place. ” John Howard took advantage of the huge CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT (do you know what that is?) left by Labor and turned it into a surplus. Time to wipe the sand from your eyes and take a look at reality Paul.

    • Em says:

      09:52am | 12/05/10

      My issue with k-Rudd and the govt is lack of vision - they’ve got bitsy little pieces of popularist policy, e.g. the internet censorship policy, that don’t paint a vision of how they want Australia to be. And if they did have such a vision, the first time it gets criticised or there is a bad opinion poll, they’d run away from it.

    • Mike says:

      10:32am | 12/05/10

      Let’s just say a quote from Winston Churchill, “If you don’t vote liberal (Labor) at 18, you have no heart. If you don’t vote conservative (Liberal) by the time you’re 30, you have no brain.” I will add “if you vote for a third party, you have no spine”.

      Basically, politics screws you over and compulsory voting is a chore at times.

    • The Guardian says:

      12:38pm | 12/05/10

      Mike,
      Freedom and democracy should demand only one thing of its citizens. That you cast a vote! Thus ensuring a comprehensive democratic process. Heres a quote for you Mike… “he who seeks security over liberty deserves neither”.

    • Darryl Price says:

      05:00pm | 12/05/10

      Aristide Briande actually, (not Winston) but it is a good homily.

    • Amber says:

      12:29pm | 13/05/10

      What brain-dead sector of this country ever considered him ‘‘good in crisis’’ when he went berserk over his missing hair-dryer ? And the wrong food being served to him?

    • mb says:

      07:40am | 14/05/10

      Watch this woodduck closely during his next hostpial visit - (probably today)—-see what happens when he shakes somebody’s hand. It will give you an insight into his level of sincerity.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter