With struggling Aussie families paying consistently more for their food and groceries than other developed countries we need to take a long hard look at what’s causing the problem.

Off your trolley, but no respite for consumers.

First, compare Australia to other OECD countries and there is one fact that jumps out. Australia has one of the most highly concentrated grocery sectors in the developed world.

Just two players – Coles and Woolworths – control 87% of supermarkets over 2000 square metres. They are increasing their share of fresh food, liquor, petrol and now hardware. Their tentacles spread to mobile phones, banking services and electronics. They own enough poker machines to put Las Vegas Casinos to shame.

Compare the highly concentrated supermarket sector with those overseas. Significantly, New Zealand also has a highly concentrated market with just 2 players (one of which is a Woolworths-owned company) dominating the supermarket sector. Well, surprise, surprise, New Zealand also has some of the highest levels of food inflation in the developed world.

Now let’s look at Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, France, and Italy just to name a few. All of these countries consistently have much lower food inflation than Australia and New Zealand. Unlike us, however, all these countries have a much greater diversity of supermarket players that keeps prices lower. It’s simple. The more price competitive players you have in a market, the lower the retail prices paid by consumers.

Naturally, we get the same old excuses from the supermarket giants. First, they blame the drought. Well, given that they are importing more and more food and grocery products from overseas, they are increasingly drought-proof. Also, just ask any farmer or supplier whether or not the giants have been screwing them down on price.

More excuses are offered for the higher prices. We’re told that “global factors” are to blame. Commodity prices are priced internationally, we’re told. Yes, that’s right, but since other countries in the OECD are also paying international prices for commodities, any international rises are already factored into the food inflation numbers of these OECD countries. So strike two as far as excuses go.

Then we get told that workers’ earnings have gone up. Let’s leave aside that we may be working longer hours, let’s not forget that more of those earnings are going to pay for higher grocery prices. Aussie families would be getting more in their pockets if grocery prices were not rising as fast as they are.

Speaking of earnings, go have a look, for example, at Woolworths’ Annual Reports. These reveal that the earnings of their top executives have been rising very generously in recent years. Yes, Woolworths has been increasing their profit margins, but grocery prices have also be been rising during that time. So as grocery prices continue to rise so do the pay packets of the top executives. Strike three!

What needs to happen?

Well, we certainly need full price transparency from the duopolists.

This is particularly critical following the recent handing down of the Senate Inquiry Report into the GROCERYchoice failure. That Report reveals that the Federal Government and Minister Craig Emerson must now go to plan B to give consumers full transparency on grocery prices.

Consumers need information on grocery prices that is up-to-date and accurate. Consumers also need to know grocery prices at all their local major supermarkets in order to find their cheapest local supermarket. GROCERYchoice failed on all fronts. The pricing information on the GROCERYchoice website was meaningless, out of date and misleading.

Consumers need full transparency on prices and the Federal Government’s GROCERYchoice website failed to deliver that much needed full transparency.

Full pricing information on all grocery items could easily be provided by Coles and Woolworths via their own website as all their grocery prices are stored electronically. Coles and Woolworths currently do not give customers full “real time” transparency on prices, but they could if they chose to do so.

Coles knows the prices of all their products at each of their supermarkets. So does Woolworths. Consumers could easily be given that information by Coles and Woolworths via the Chains’ own websites as part of their customer service.

Coles and Woolworths have sophisticated information systems to keep track of every product they sell. They have the technology to provide customers with timely and up to date pricing information on all their products at all their supermarkets.

So, if Coles and Woolworths were as serious as they claim they are about customer service they would launch their own websites giving consumers “real time” pricing information for every product in every store. Customers wanting to do so could then go online to check prices for themselves at any time.

Real time pricing information would empower consumers by providing full transparency on grocery prices enabling them to make informed decisions. The airlines give consumers real time information everyday on every seat on every flight, so Coles and Woolworths can also give consumers real time prices. Coles and Woolworths have that information every time they scan a product at the checkout and they should make it available to consumers.

If Coles and Woolworths fail to provide customers with real time pricing information, then the Federal Government should move to require Coles and Woolworths to do so. This could involve the Federal Government legislating to require that supermarkets of a size greater than 2000 square metres make publicly available a website containing real time pricing information on all products sold in those supermarkets.

But, full price transparency is not enough. With Australia having some of the weakest competition laws in the world, the Federal Government needs to act urgently to repair our competition laws. With a plan of action ready to go, all that the Federal Government and Minister Emerson need to do is act.

11 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.Chong says:

      06:13am | 25/11/09

      From a lefty perspective, I find these arguments curios.
      If capitalism is about market gain,and growth, are not these two companies doing exactly that?
      Even the “corner shop” seeks to gain and keep customers.
      The big two have got where they are because they offer the best economies of scale- again,capitalism at work.
      Govt control over market share sounds very much like socialism, something unpalatable to all true capitalist,big or little.
      Or is a little bit of “nanny state socialism” acceptable in order to help companies that are not as economically efficient as the big players.

    • Daniel says:

      07:34am | 25/11/09

      Frank why doesnt your organization run a national campaign for Australians to shop elsewhere instead of Coles and Woolworths that will hit them in the hip pocket?

    • Ziggy says:

      07:58am | 25/11/09

      They should offer economies of scale but they don’t - do they? They offer less choice, more packaging, crappy ‘fresh food’ and a pricing poicy set well above inflation. They have no competition except their comfortable ‘follow each other’ accomodation. They are also among the least efficient retailers in the world. Cost more to run the business? Just put the prices up! Do I blame them for what they do? No, they are just taking advantage of a system that allows this sort of monopolisation and unfair competition and consumers who will always put convenience and price(short term) over their own long term good and health.
      We deserve what we get.

    • Adam says:

      08:45am | 25/11/09

      The grocery duopoly seems to generate quite a few stories here. This one is similar to the others: decry the concentrated nature of supermarket ownership in Australia, then propose actions which will not actually address the concentration of ownership!

      It is ridiculous to expect that, before going to get something to cook for dinner, shoppers will log onto a website and check the prices at their local Coles or Woolies. They won’t; this idea won’t work.

      The only way to address the supermarket duopoly, if one is serious, is forced divestments or splitting up the empires. Now, I don’t advocate that, but that is the only solution to the concentration problem itself.

    • Joel B1 says:

      09:04am | 25/11/09

      Frank, get out of your office grab a couple of kids and go shopping!

      I did, that’s why I know you’re wrong. You ignore many “realities” about grocery shopping.

      See http://42south147east.info/categories/Retail.aspx for some very real analyses of why GroceryWatch and similar schemes just don’t work and don’t work for the people who need it most.

      Here’s a taster “The co-location effect”. Many large supermarkets are co-located, they’re in the same building or shopping complex or in many cases located across the road from each other. So it’s no big deal to check out the other supermarket is it? If you really wanted to save money you could cherry-pick specials from each.

      Please, stop the theory. Get out of your office and do the grocery shopping. It’ll open your eyes like it did mine.

    • Joel B1 says:

      09:35am | 25/11/09

      GroceryChoice was going to REDUCE competition. It’s a scheme that disadvantaged small independent corner shops and specialist markets.

      It was a “stuffed” version of Duncan Kerr’s Denison Price Watch. That did work because all the grocery shops in the area were surveyed so you knew you local shop had good prices on vegetables and milk but that coles/woolies had better prices on breakfast cereals. You also knew that the local market had much better prices for meat. So you could shop locally more often and do a big dry-foods trip occasionally. That saves money for struggling households.

      GroceryChoice was not going to work. Get over it.

    • AFR says:

      10:41am | 25/11/09

      Meh. If you’re so concerned - shop at Aldi.

    • Budz says:

      12:29pm | 25/11/09

      Is Australia too small for other international companies to come here and compete with the duopoly? Why doesn’t Walmart of the like come here and give these guys a run for their money?

    • Moi says:

      12:57pm | 25/11/09

      Only last week my partner and I shopped at Frankilns in an attempt to escape the duopolies. We found that although we purchased less, we did pay more then we had to run around to a deli and fish shop for a couple of items Franklins didn’t have, adding another 30 minutes to our usual 30 minute shopping trip. Same thing happened when we tried Aldi that had even less variety. I really want to leave the duopolies as a personal prostest, but it’s just not economical right now - both for time and money wasted.

    • AFR says:

      01:24pm | 25/11/09

      Moi, you hit the nail on the head. The main reason why we whinge, but don;‘t do anythnig - laziness. This applies to so much in our lives. From groceries to petrol to banking. And Coles and Woolies are only capitalising on that laziness.

    • I Tarbell says:

      04:15pm | 27/11/09

      Guys, you are all missing the point - you are all getting ripped off under the Woolworths/Coles duopoly, and you don’t even realise it.

      Our retail sector has degenerated into a duopoly, not because of “capitalism at work” - in fact the exact opposite. It’s degenerate into a duopoly because of special government privilege and protection from competition (through the planning laws) that gives Woolworths/Coles special advantage over their smaller competitors.

      T.Chong further confuses the advantages that arise from genuine “economies of scale” (that result in true efficiencies, which deliver lower prices to consumers) with the advantages that simply arise from a large market share that gives a firm the power to bully & extort suppliers to obtain advantages over their smaller competitors (which at end of the day simply deliver higher prices for consumers).

      T Chong should learn that Woolworths/Coles’ power does not come from genuine “economies of scale”, but simply from their ability to bully & extort suppliers – and this why OECD figures show that supermarket prices in Australia are accelerating faster in Australia that anywhere else in the developed world.

      The economic order that has evolved in Australia, were two players have the dominance that Woolworths/Coles enjoy and can protect themselves from competition by anti-competitive practices due to weak and ineffective competition laws, is the complete antithesis of the free enterprise system – and closer to that of socialism.

      As for Joel B1 -  he (or she) must own shares in Woolworths/Coles as he is very quick to jump to their defence. So quick,  that you really have to question whether Joel B 1 understands that he is the victim of Geographic Price Discrimination – a practice that can only occur in markets where competition has failed, resulting in consumers unknowingly paying a higher price for the same product from different stores of the same chain.

      Interesting, the GroceryChoice that Joel B1 boldly claims “was not going to work” would have exposed the extent the of Geographic Price Discrimination, and enabled consumers to identify Woolworths “combat stores” where prices are low, and their “non-combat stores” where consumers get slugged.

      It is as plain as the nose on your face, that all those on board the Woolworths/Coles gravy train had a lot to lose if the extent of Geographic Price Discrimination was exposed by the revamped Grocery Choice. 

      As for the reference to your blog, at least you could is identify yourself.  Ignorance can be bliss, but good on Professor Zumbo from trying to open peoples eyes as to the way Woolworths/Coles pull the wool over peoples eyes.

      Lets cut to the chase - we need the government and the ACCC to have the backbone by stamping out the anti-competitive practices of Woolworths/Coles to get a better deal for Australian consumers

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter