Sometimes it takes a disaster to shake the complacency out of us. To rethink the attitude of ‘she’ll be right’ when clearly things are not right.

Yep, we're definitely going to need a plan. Photo: Sam Mooy

So isn’t it time to develop a national masterplan to help guide future planning and development in this country to try and stop the increasing loss of life and damage that the natural forces around Australia unleash?

If you look at the past decade there have many natural disasters, both fire and flood, which have destroyed so many homes. We have seen the fires in Victoria which swept through the hill communities of Flowerdale, Kinglake and Marysville in 2009 destroying over 2,000 homes and taking 173 lives. Back in 1983 Ash Wednesday fires in South Australia destroyed 2,400 homes.

Increasingly our cities are at risk. Around Sydney, the Christmas Day fires in 2001 ended up destroying 109 homes; in 2003 we saw almost 500 homes destroyed in Canberra. Worse was to come. In 2011 we have our third largest capital city devastated.

The reality is that each time the devastation and cost is worse. In the 1974 floods, Brisbane was little more than a country town when 7,000 homes were flooded and the damage bill was over $200million. The 2001 Christmas Day fires caused approximately $75 million in damage.

Then in 2009, the cost of the Black Saturday fires disaster is estimated to have exceeded $4 billion. The Queensland flood bill alone is estimated to surpass that - $5 billion and the loss to our GDP is being put at $15billion. The cost of natural disaster is extensive, expensive and each time the bills keep rising.

The costs may not be what this country can afford but it is a cost we will have to pay. The Federal Government is going to pay 75c of every dollar spent by the Queensland Government. In doing this isn’t the Federal Government, on behalf of taxpayers, entitled to step in and say ‘If you want us to bear the risk you must share the responsibility to make sure that all new development is appropriate’?

Should the taxpayers be asked to continually accept the risk as the cost of these events moves from the millions to billions of dollars? As a nation we should do our best to insure against future costs.

Like an insurance company managing risk, we should as a nation demand that the risk is lessened, the future costs contained. The best way to do that is to stop development where buildings and lives are potentially at risk.

The Federal Government can take the lead to help reframe our planning laws to ensure sustainable safe development, where development is less likely to be ravaged by fires or inundated by flood at such cost. In the national interest we should look at ways to discourage home owners or prospective buyers or other people who might take up residence in flood or bushfire-prone areas.

Compensation may be required for some.

A national master plan can draw on state planning experiences. Following the 1983 bushfires that exploded across South Australia on a day that will forever be remembered as Ash Wednesday, the SA Government enacted an Environmental Policy to prohibit development in bushfire-prone areas.

More recently the Black Saturday Royal Commission in 2009, the most comprehensive investigation of a natural disaster in the country’s history, made recommendations after 154 days of evidence from more than 400 witnesses. It is timely to recall a key recommendation:

Develop and implement a retreat and resettlement strategy for existing developments in areas of unacceptably high bushfire risk, including a scheme for non-compulsory acquisition by the state of land in these areas.

Both the SA and Victorian governments promised to seriously consider the recommendations of the Commission. Yet the SA government didn’t accept that recommendation. The Victorian government didn’t accept that recommendation. The Federal Government should step into the breach and drive a critical rethink of what this nation must do to better manage disaster.

No doubt there will be other useful findings out of the Queensland Flood Royal Commission.

According to Premier Anna Bligh, 28,000 homes need to be completely rebuilt. At a time of such loss no government is inclined to dictate the terms on which the victims can rebuild their lives. However tough leadership is required - building 28,000 homes involves a huge effort and cost when history has the habit of repeating itself.

If we simply allow development on the same land, it overlooks the fact that some land should not be rebuilt on. In land demonstrated to be prone to flooding, new development, even if it rivals the iconic Seidler Riverside Centre, should not be given the green light.

A national master plan would be a blueprint for Australia and an aid for State governments - a planning tool based on the best science available as to what areas are suitable for what types of development and what should be left out of harm’s way. Already the information we need for a masterplan for floods is being collated. Defence has sent out mapping experts who have flown over affected areas to record the extent of the floods.

Now is the opportunity to seriously rethink the way our planning laws operate to ensure sustainable safe development, development that is less likely to be ravaged by fires or inundated by flood. It is a matter that should be on the agenda at the next COAG meeting.

One suggestion might be that the former ‘Commonwealth Natural Disaster Mitigation’ Program be refocussed on planning to achieve that very outcome – disaster mitigation.

This disaster, as horrible as it is, provides a once-in-a-generation opportunity to seriously look at a master plan for this country – drought and flooding rains we can live with, but not live in.

Most commented

31 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Not So Blind Willy says:

      06:30am | 23/01/11

      Rather than depending on a government run “masterplan”, how about everyone regressing back to the common sense that our forefathers and mothers relied on. They built their homes on fertile land near a reliable water source so as to not go thirsty and hungry, they cleared unnecessary brush and trees away from their homes in case of bush fires and they built their homes on high ground in case of flooding. They did not blame someone else for natural disasters and they did not demand that the government, tax payers or a successful industry bail them out during hard times as today’s handout dependent population does.

    • Mr Pod says:

      06:58am | 23/01/11

      In my neck of Queensland’s woods a very large development has been approved on a flood plain which was completely underwater during the floods.  The development includes a large federal government funded bridge to make the development possible.  It is still going ahead.
      Federal, State and council politicians won’t be too pleased at any attempt to remove property developer perks from the trough - you should know that.

    • Daniel says:

      07:08am | 23/01/11

      Well Helen what do you suggest? The Liberals were the party that never spent any money on infrastructure under John Howard. This is a first??What will the Liberals suggest?

    • iansand says:

      07:15am | 23/01/11

      Step 1 would be to tell your boss to stop playing politics with disasters.  Has that man no decency?

    • Rosie says:

      07:36am | 23/01/11

      Good idea Helen but first we should have a master plan to always have a surplus and it should never be touched unless it is put to very good use like now, the re-building of the lives of flood victims and their communities.

      The devastation caused by the floods makes the Global Financial crisis comparatively small in importance. The urgency for the Govt to respond and intervene for this country and its citizens is paramount. During the GFC the Govt was quick to respond because we had a surplus left behind by the Howard Liberal Govt. The Labor Federal Govt went on a spending spree when it would have made more sense if we rode the GFC out by allowing the citizens of this country to pay less tax for stimulus spending. Some of us were not affected by the GFC and used the stimulus given to us for a holiday to Bali.

      Yes by all means go ahead with a masterplan to deal with disasters but at the end of the day no one is able to predict what mother natures dishes out when it decides to strike. Life would have been easy for this country and its citizens if we had a surplus for re-building now.

    • Joan says:

      08:15am | 23/01/11

      ` the former ‘Commonwealth Natural Disaster Mitigation’ Program be refocussed on planning to achieve that very outcome – disaster mitigation.` Don’t understand .... `former`?  does it still exist??? if it does.. what is its purpose if not `disaster mitigation`? With once in a hundred year `biggest ever`  worsening disasters largely due to ever growing population so a master plan should always be changing. If QLD and Victoria had the same population as 100 years ago the disasters as experienced wouldn’t be the biggest , or worst ever.

    • Against the Man says:

      08:21am | 23/01/11

      Step one get rid of Gillard and the ALP. Step two problem solved, less Australians dead. (Between the Queensland floods, insulation debacle and dodgy healthcare thanks to roxon, Australian civilians are dieing in record numbers under a ALP government).

    • mags says:

      08:43am | 23/01/11

      In response to Not So Blind Willy. They also didn’t have to contend with corrupt councils and the Greens.

      To Daniel and Iansand.  Firstly, Tony Abbott is doing his jib - calling the government to account for their actions or lack thereof. Secondly, if Labor governments left a surplus behind when they are kicked out of office, the Coalition wouldn’t have to keep concentrating on getting rid of debt.

      The constant failure of state governments to do their job of funding infrastructure for their states has gone on for decades. Other things are more important. Even Premiers from the same Party can’t get their act together at COAG meetings, the ideal place to start with any plan. They are too busy shoring up support by spending on populist projects instead of the really important ones, like ensuring the safety and well being of their citizens.

    • iansand says:

      03:07pm | 24/01/11

      Tony Abbott’s job at a time of national disaster is to STFU and get out of the way of people with a job to do.  Unless he has a constructive suggestion.  I suspect that he has alienated a few people with his idiocy.

    • mags says:

      04:49pm | 24/01/11

      The same could be said of that droning excuse for a PM. She took every opportunity for a photo with victims instead of going back to Canberra and working on a solution to the problems that arise from such devastation.

      Tony Abbott also visited flooded areas, without fanfare, to find out the extent of the damage and what could be done. Please open your other eye before opening your mouth, it might be a new experience.

      He is not the only one asking the hard questions and the only ones being alienated are those who don’t want to hear the answers.

    • VinceOz says:

      09:07am | 23/01/11

      I personally think the Federal Government is into too much as it is. Its a state responsibility. We don’t need more laws we need less.

      This kind of talk is like the USA, do you think FEMA is really for emergencies? Its not its a paramilitary civilian army.

      Less law, less social services, more responsibility.

    • scaper... says:

      09:47am | 23/01/11

      We need a master plan? That will be the day! But first we would need to get rid of the useless government, the hopeless opposition, the gutless sycophants called the MSM and a nutty assortment of oxygen thieves.

      What this country really needs is a revolution as this “WE need” coming from a so called leader just shows how much of a joke that our politicians have become!

    • Gregg says:

      09:47am | 23/01/11

      All that is needed is incorruptible legislation that:

      1. For bushfires means a firebreak of say at least half a kilometer around town boundaries is maintained, timber being used for the timber industry and cleared ground as food producing of the less flammable type.
      Bit like how people worked outside the castle walls in ye olden days.

      2. In Brisbane’s case and that of other developments in river flood plains, a flood plan could have been developed in 1841, 1893 , 1974 or now and that means no new development within the plan area, no nothing other than pasture, crops or parkland.

      So so easy Helen if politicians want to think straightly and have the guts to act.
      But even politicians do have trouble thinking don’t they for remember when you as Communications minister accompamied a local member to a small country region to celebrate a nobile communication service going on line?
      Did Paul ever tell you of his trip some months earlier to a small town for an opening shebang of CDMA services and funny!, Pauls GSM phone wouldn’t work.
      So what happened next after quite a few people had outlayed significant money for CDMA phones, Paul must have leant on you for a GSM service!
      Terrific, wasn’t it the cost people were put to to partake of this great well planned service that was only going to be around for a couple of years anyway and then find a few months later they only needed to buy much cheaper GSM sets.

      You do not need a CDMA phone by any chance do you?, going cheap
      So look, any disaster planning and any commissions of enquiry are always only going to be as good as the people involved and what they want to have revealed or covered up.

      But use that constitutional fortitude and legislate accordingly and you can still have floods and bushfires with less disasters and make good use of some land for employment close to residences too.

    • john says:

      10:07am | 23/01/11

      Was this event a Haiti earthquake where 316,000 people had died or Sumatra island’s coast Tsunami that killed 230,000 people in a dozen countries or even a hurricane Katrina where 1,836 people lost their lives? Or even a cyclone Tracy?.  NO not by any stretch of the imagination.

      Get a grip PEOPLE, its a flood event from a wetter than normal wet season yes unfortunately people did die, towns got flooded, some real bad. People did their best to minimise loss of life and damage, now we are beginning to look like panicked idiots fighting over TV airtime in this endless coverage like CNN.

      Making this look like a major disaster of biblical proportions is pathetic.

      If you choose to live in this country then you know the top half is exposed to severe cyclones and flooding and the bottom half is exposed to extreme heat and bush fires.

    • biff says:

      10:29am | 23/01/11

      Step 1 is to find intelligent leadership, both at the federal level and state level. The search continues.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      10:41am | 23/01/11

      But that would be intervention in a free market, something that is heresy to the Liberals. How about if a person wants build or live in a disaster prone area then they take the consequences. No bailouts, ever.

    • Brad says:

      02:58pm | 24/01/11

      “How about if a person wants build or live in a disaster prone area then they take the consequences. No bailouts, ever.” - Couldn’t agree more.  Nobody has ever accused the current Liberal Party of being free-market. The Liberal Party should probably just rename itself the “Big-Government Conservative Party” and be done with it.

    • OchreBunyip says:

      11:15am | 23/01/11

      How about we realise natural disasters really cannot be contained, they can only be planned for; that our own common sense is free and doesn’t require government regulation or taxation. That every adult can be encouraged to think for themselves and educate their children to do so as well. If you buy on a flood plain, expect to get flooded. If you build in uncleared bush, expect bush fires. It really isn’t rocket science. If you don’t insure your property appropriately, which includes reading the agreement, then expect to not be covered.

      While flood victims are undeniably doing it tough, the only real tragedies are those who have lost love ones; property and possessions can be replaced. While state government support for volunteers was good to see, far more volunteers sidestepped the bureaucratic registration system and simply turned up to help out. There comes a time when we, the citizens, take action outside of any government framework, regulation, registration or programme that prevents people from helping each other and just get on with it. This demonstrates the Aussie spirit more than anything; this whinging about government this and regulation that is so last century.

      Congratulations and appreciation to all the volunteers, government organised or not. See you in the mud soon.

    • CJ Morgan says:

      12:42pm | 23/01/11

      Strange that we’re experiencing all these “natural” disasters, which apparently require a “masterplan” that wasn’t necessary during 10 years of the Howard government - and Senator Coonan still can’t bring herself to mention AGW.

      What’s needed is for the Opposition to stop pretending that all these “natural” disasters and AGW aren’t connected, and work together with the Government to address the causes of the problem.

    • Seano says:

      06:38pm | 24/01/11

      I was wondering the same thing.

    • Shrug says:

      12:54pm | 23/01/11

      Funnily enough, we already have just such a national body for this sort of work.  Emergency Management Australia - National Disaster Organisation as was.  Only been in existence the last 27 years! 

      Changed its name just the once (under Keating in 1993). Moved just the once,  from Defence to AGs (under Howard in 2001).

      So here they are -  http://www.ema.gov.au/ 

      They do a bloody good job, too, preparing plans and backups *before* possible emergencies of all sorts, and in getting help mobilised when things *do* go pear-shaped. 

      Short history here -  http://www.jephc.com/full_article.cfm?content_id=372

      All a bit too hard for a tired old Lib front bencher to grasp, perhaps, but there they are, doing their job.

    • Thommo says:

      12:55pm | 23/01/11

      Each State should be responsible for their own plan. It’s not fair to lump the cost onto all Australians when some people go out of their way to deliberately make sane decisions and then they have to pay for the insane people as well. Communism never helped anybody ever. Go read Atlas Shrugged

    • Soames says:

      01:19pm | 23/01/11

      Replying to biff, absolutely right, to extrapolate; leadership ought to come primarily at federal level, and this is a problem, vis-a-vie states rights, e.g, building codes, and so on.  A federal government has standing legislated power authorising the attorney general to act in times of national disaster, but also has power to enact law, including a particular disaster, not shared by all states and territories. Just how far the federal attorney general,  Mr McClelland,  is involved, one is unaware.

      In reply to NSB Willy, you’re painting a canvas of mythical characters. Early farmers were as obnoxious and greedy as present day farmers, i.e, getting as much water as possible from rivers to expand the productivity of their holding. “so as not to go hungry and thirsty” ? Give me strength. “cleared un-necessary bush and trees” ?  More like ringbarking redgums and other hardwoods, and any trees close to their holding, which would suck up water,  in order to plant vegetable crops. Of course, this wanton vandalism, unknown to the folks back then, of limited intelligence,  resulted in the salination of riverland close to their water source and beyond,  those trees naturally having a natural biological sequence of events for continuation of botanical survival.

      iansand has a point. If there’s going to be a ‘reply’ from the Opposition, in terms of decency, it ought be in the focused on non-exposure of the body of it’s incumbent, an embarassment to the rest of the world.

      Apologies to other posters, who make important and valuable contributions

    • john tracey says:

      01:38pm | 23/01/11

      The Liberal Party had a federal government 1996 to 2007 that did not reveal any master plans for disasters at all.
      Now The Liberal Party demands a master plan for disasters while in federal opposition.

    • Trude says:

      01:50pm | 23/01/11

      A good place to start would be on-the-ground-autonomy for emergency actions. Look at what happened at the Wivenhoe Dam, the engineer, Graham Keegan, wanted to start releasing more water 72 hours earlier, he was there, he could see what was happening. However he had to wait for approval from stakeholders till it was too late. Autonomy to act in an emergency situation could have saved lives and property.

    • Reg says:

      02:33pm | 23/01/11

      First let’s get things in perspective. http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/begin/cells/scale/  Do slide the bar to the right.

      Unrestrained development invites unrestrained disaster. Separate out all the districts where there have been higher floods before, than address the rest.

      The Queensland house that I lived in was in the cyclone area and built in the 1930s. Its “stilts” were a metre into the ground and two metres high and were actually debarked trees with about a two metre girth. The floor joists were bolted to the “trees” and it would be my guess that, although the rest of the house was chamfer board, the foundations would have weighed as much as the house itself. In countless cyclones, there was only once where the house lifted a tiny amount then dropped back.  A two metre flood would never have made any difference unless it was a torrent. Now is the time to re-discover that building codes have a serious purpose and bugger the whinging developers who want to stack people where-ever they can find a vacant space. Bribes cost lives.

    • casba says:

      08:18am | 24/01/11

      Well don’t look to this lot for a master plan. They haven’t got a clue and would spend the money on something else anyway.  The school mistress Joolya wouldn’t have a clue either and would probably bore us all rigid telling us about it if she did.

    • Thommo says:

      12:02pm | 24/01/11

      Joolya Giltard - that’s her new nickname

    • Population Pooper says:

      07:37am | 25/01/11

      Having toomany kids is a disaster!

    • Ray says:

      02:49pm | 25/01/11

      It is ironic that the Wivenhoe Dam that was built to lessen the risk of flood damage to Brisbane, has in fact contributed largely to the 2011 Brisbane Flood, thanks to the ineptitude of the dam operator, which is a Qld Govt instrumentality.

      As a taxpayer, I find it appalling that the Federal Govt is considering compensating the Qld Govt for this gross error. The Feds should contribute not one cent towards the Brisbane floods.


      should not contribute a cent towards

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

A #DrWho time warp! Excellent.

Daniel Piotrowski

(And more to come).

Daniel Piotrowski

Former prime minister Kevin Rudd has backed same sex marriage. I've got the story @newscomauHQhttp://t.co/kJx8V5js6g

ToryShepherd

Onya, @KRuddMP“@newscomauHQ: BREAKING: Kevin Rudd has come out in support of same sex marriage: http://t.co/CFaHrxyV5G

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter