On Saturday NSW Labor suffered the heaviest defeat in our 120-year history.

Down but not, well, actually pretty far down. Picture: Anthony Reginato

Losing an election after 16 years in office is part of the natural cycle of politics. Receiving our lowest vote since 1904, and winning our lowest number of seats since 1898, is anything but cyclical.

The voters expressed their fury at the way Labor has run this state for at least the last four years. One in three voters who expressly identify themselves as Labor did not vote Labor on Saturday.

The State Parliamentary Labor Party conducted its affairs in recent years in a way that destroyed the public’s faith in NSW Labor’s integrity. Labor will only recover if it is searingly honest about what happened on the weekend.

Many felt that we stopped being a Labor government - that we weren’t on the side of the people, but rather hostage to self interest and to special interests. Labor - the party formed to fight for the outsiders - ultimately became identified as a government for party insiders and property developers.

Voters look to their state government for communal services: Modern schools, state-of-the-art hospitals and community health services, accessible public transport, safe streets, protection of vulnerable children, a flourishing artistic and cultural sector, social housing, our natural environment protected for all to enjoy.

For the past 70 years, our social democratic politics have dominated New South Wales, capturing the middle ground and delivering social reform we are right to be proud of. Yet the breadth of state Labor’s agenda was, after Bob Carr’s retirement, assaulted by a very small clique inside the government.

If we are honest, we must admit that we are as weak in the community today as we are in the new Parliament. In the past 16 years, more than 130 Labor Party branches shut their doors. One in four branches closed down, and many of those that remain are on life support. While Labor governed, the Labor Party was disappearing from the everyday lives of many communities. NSW Labor won elections without the Labor Party.

A political model of corporate donors funding massive electronic advertising helped deliver election victories in the good times. When the tough times arrived, the corporate donors were long gone. The cost of the long neglect of the Party’s membership became clear. On Saturday, Labor was able to staff fewer polling booths than at any election since the 1930s when the Lang tyranny tore Labor asunder. We must rebuild the Labor Party from the ground up.

NSW Labor’s organisation and rules must be overhauled to democratise the party and empower individual members. The road map is there: The 2010 ALP National Review Report delivered by Carr, Bracks and Faulkner.

This result does not spell the end for NSW Labor. How we respond to this result will determine our party’s future. Our internal governance – our structures, rules and culture – failed us. In turn, we failed the people of NSW.

In the 1930s, Ben Chifley and Bill McKell knew that Labor in this state had to reform before it would ever regain the confidence of the people. In the 1960s, Gough Whitlam understood that the party had to change in order to become a credible alternative national government. Once again, Labor has to have the courage to change.

As we rebuild, there will be big policy challenges to grapple with. But there is a core principle that should guide us along the way – our belief in active government as a force for good.

I believe that Labor values are Australian values. Since 1891 Labor has stood for a fair go for all and a decent life for everyone. As we set out on an arduous and long period of rebuilding State Labor - first as a fighting opposition, and later as a credible alternative government - let us reapply that ethic to all of our work.

This year, there will be a contract cleaner – she’s likely from a non English speaking background, she’s in her 50s and she’s been doing this for 20 years at just above the minimum wage – who will get long service leave for the first time ever.

And she’ll get it because – for one brief, shining moment amidst the indulgence and debauchery of the last four years – a Labor government did what Labor is supposed to do, legislating for this right. When we debase the standing of the Labor Party, it is the people who most need a Labor government who pay the price.

For that cleaner’s sake, and for the sake of hundreds of thousands of people for whom markets don’t always deliver a fair or decent outcome, we need to find the way back.


Luke Foley is a Labor member of the NSW Legislative Council.

113 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      05:09am | 28/03/11

      “NSW Labor’s organisation and rules must be overhauled to democratise the party and empower individual members.”

      You could start by removing the sexist rule that gives female candidates extra votes at preselection, purely because of their gender. The Labor Party has very little to offer men.

    • james milton says:

      07:25am | 28/03/11

      Which sexist rule?? I don’t believe one exists.

    • acotrel says:

      08:01am | 28/03/11

      @james
      ‘Which sexist rule?? I don’t believe one exists.’

      It doesn’t matter James.  If one doesn’t exist, we’ll invent one!

    • Richard says:

      08:06am | 28/03/11

      You’re right Eric. That, along with their tactical M.O. of sexistly ridiculing any Liberal leader who goes to the beach and wears a pair of swimmers, makes them one of the most misandrist organisations in society.

    • john says:

      09:14am | 28/03/11

      @Richard ” Misandry ” Strange how its backfired for having a go at Abbott for going to the beach in speedos, whats wrong with that? What is wrong with these extremist lefties? I don’t get it.

      Gillard’s venom seems to be more than just having a go at abbott, she seems so bitter it comes across that she hates men.

      Now she’s saying abott’s an ‘extremist’. What a hypocrite.

      This has the same smell like keating’s arrogance, and most likely the same fate too as kenelly with her same strategy that came across as ‘misandry ’ when attacking barry o’farrel.

    • Sony B Goode says:

      09:58am | 28/03/11

      Labor needs to find some core values which are not in wild disconnect with reality. Ideals such as “social justice” and “equity”  need to be jettisoned as deprecated class warfare rhetoric no longer relevant in modern Australia.

    • Jessie says:

      12:00pm | 28/03/11

      Yeah sure, start with getting rid of the only rule that guarantees women a role in a male-dominated party. That should be our election priority, of all things. Chip on your shoulder much?

    • john says:

      12:28pm | 28/03/11

      @Jessie are you feeling insecure about females being able to win a race without a handicap start?

      Women can’t be that hopeless, surely not.

    • Erick says:

      03:18pm | 28/03/11

      Jessie, I am against discrimination on the basis of sex. You are for it. So is the ALP.

      That is a good reason to oppose both.

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      11:07pm | 28/03/11

      I’m with you Richard, when the “Silver Bogan” Bob Hawke wore budgie smugglers, not a peep.

    • Phil says:

      05:14am | 28/03/11

      The State Parliamentary Labor Party conducted its affairs in recent years in a way that destroyed the public’s faith in NSW Labor’s integrity.
      That would be the understatement of the millenium.
      The mostly crooked way which members feed from the public purse with a self serving attitude is disgusting.
      The way dark deals are done without regard for NSW citizens, the corruption is endemic and almost bred into the party. When you take a group of people who have barely run a cricket clubs treasury well and place them in charge of such vast sums of money it is a recipie for disaster.
      Firstly you need to get business people into your ranks. Yes some of those nasty bosses that actually have an idea how to run a corporation. Stop trying to be a charity, screw middle Australia for the benefit of the lazy.
      Just a start list I am sure many others will add to this.
      That and dont put up a puppy dog with big blue eyes that you think everyone will like and be afraid to put down.

    • Tedd says:

      08:14am | 28/03/11

      “a way that destroyed the public’s faith in NSW Labor’s integrity.”

      “NSW Labor’s integrity”’??  There may have been some once, but they sheredded it themselves.  the public’s faith was always a veneer

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      08:55am | 28/03/11

      In addition to the accurate points mentioned by Phil, I’d just add - if you knew what the problem was, why didn’t you fix it? 
       
      You don’t actually need an election-night blood-letting; you can do it any time it is required. You KNEW Labor was on the nose; you KNEW they were fiscally irresponsible and morally bankrupt. The time to take action was when this became clear, not after the next election. You could have kept another dozen or more seats.

      And now you want to use your most marketable commodity in Kenneally as a sacrificial goat? Wrong choice. Start by purging the party of officeholders who have never had a job except in a union. You claim to represent the working man but you have none in the party apparatus. This will also spell doom for the federal parliamentary party - it will only take another couple of financially-related bungles for people to start questioning why they have given the national chequebook to a front-bench 90% of whom have never actually held a real job and have been snouts down in the trough from the day they joined a union.

    • n_dude says:

      12:05pm | 28/03/11

      @Tony - you are absolutely correct. Of course when Rees was pushed into the premier’s role byu the faceless men and then was removed when tried to get rid of the factional leader (do you remember Joe Tripodi going to the press with his family in tow sobbing about how he was victimised in the clean up - the next day he then worked with his mate Eddie to put Keneally in power). What about Eddie Obeid’s multi million dollar properties? You have to question how he managed to get those on a party room salary? As much as it pains me to say it, but NSW Labor deserve to be in the political wilderness for many years…

    • Mahhrat says:

      05:15am | 28/03/11

      Luke, take the philosophy of your last three paragraphs, bring it to the first meeting of the labour rebuilding team. Anyone who argues for moderation, against it, or in any way delays progress back to it, sack them.

    • Pete says:

      06:07am | 28/03/11

      I nearly didnt recognise who he was talking about there. If anyone from the ALP, state or Federal reads this, your porblem has been put in a nutshell for you

    • Tedd says:

      06:17am | 28/03/11

      Pity no one had the courage to change when it was most needed - 2-3 years ago.  Next.

    • someone says:

      06:31am | 28/03/11

      You still don’t get it, do you?  It’s not about “the party” and rebuilding it and opening branches again and faffing around with your internal rules and factions.

      It’s about having competent people who are able to run (state) government in an efficient, transparent and productive manner. 

      No one gives a shit about your Labor party history or your “culture”.  The only thing anyone cares about is government delivering services and building and improving infrastructure.  None of which your band of incompetent career politicians and cronies have managed to do.

    • Adam Diver says:

      07:22am | 28/03/11

      My sentiments exactly, don’t talk about the process or the organisation, thats bulls**t middle management speak, its simply a lack of talent and a lack of morals that plague our governments.

    • marley says:

      07:45am | 28/03/11

      Well, I think his point is, unless they democratize the party, and start to get more members, the “talent” pool from which to draw the competent people is going to stay as narrow as it is right now.  And we’ve all seen how very narrow that is.  If they want people who can deliver, they’re going to have to widen their base from a handful of aparatchiks and start to draw in people with life and business skills that don’t focus on branch stacking and schmoozing with developers.  Otherwise, they’re doomed.

    • corso cowboy says:

      10:16pm | 28/03/11

      Luke just face it mate - the ALP is a venal, corrupt, lazy and incompetent party. You are the party of the leaners - not the lifters. That’s why with you carbon tax you want to hand all the compensation to your own voters. Doing a bit of branch building won’t change that Luke. Even when you had the branches you made sure they were just trolls. You made sure the unions had 60% of the conference vote and controlled all preselections. How many examples of this do you want? Belinda Neal, Sartor, Robertson etc. What the ALP needs is a course in Ethics and Civics 101.

    • ADNAV says:

      06:33am | 28/03/11

      I am middle Australia.
      I work, pay tax, have a family, have never asked for welfare.
      I am also an"odball, misfit and an extremist”
      I am protesting for the first time in my life.
      I am also seriously “pissed off”.
      NSW result was a given.
      Juliar and the Prime Minister Bob Brown are next.
      and for Oakshott and Windsor….the same applies.
      IGNORE MIDDLE AUSTRALIA AT YOUR PERIL

    • Dash says:

      07:26am | 28/03/11

      ADNAV, Me too. The silent majority have spoken! The ALP federally are headed the same way unless they drop their Carbon tax. The same factional leaders that destroyed Labor in NSW put Gillard into power!The results in Port Macquarie and Tamworth speak for themselves. And you’re right, anyone who speaks up against these fools in the federal ALP get labeled odball, misfit, minority, denier or extremist. In other words the ALP are arrogant and just not listening. Middle Australia has had enough and will not stand by quietly and let this disgrace of a government get away with it!

    • Elphaba says:

      08:34am | 28/03/11

      Well said, both of you.

      A bloodbath was predicted, and Federal Labor are on notice.  They still have time to start listening to what the people want - instead of trying to tell us what we want.

      What bricks they must have been shitting on Saturday night, lol

      There were no Labor faithful handing out ‘how to vote’ cards at my polling booth on Saturday.  It could have been because I live in a blue seat, but I think they’d just given up.

    • Anthony of WA says:

      08:35am | 28/03/11

      Glad to be in the company of other oddballs and misfits, althought there are a lot of us out here, which the ALP are going to find out. If the NSW election has not given them that message yet. Which it has not, listening to comments but Burke and Albenese. Governments are elected to run the country as best they can, spend our taxes wisely and improve our standard of living. Not to lie to us and when we object, insult us.

    • LeonT says:

      10:21am | 28/03/11

      ADNAV, you may have never asked for welfare, but as ‘middle Australia’, you have certainly received a lot of it over the last 20 years.

    • jeffb says:

      11:12am | 28/03/11

      ADNAV, you’ve never used the public health system, the PBS, public education system, public roads, etc… Whether you like it or not you have received plenty of benefits from the taxes you pay.

    • TimB says:

      01:35pm | 28/03/11

      @ JeffB, in what universe is health, education, and roads “welfare”?

    • CD says:

      02:55pm | 28/03/11

      Thank you TimB…

      I suppose because we take private insurance out,send kids to private schools etc etc we’re those same people being denigrated as ‘supposedly’ being rich?

      Get a grip LeonT and jeffb. To hardline Labor trolls the middle class can do no right. Maybe we should all pull up stakes and only use the public systems and see how that goes.

      FYI I am not in agreement with baby bonuses and the rest of the state paid goodies handed out willy nilly but there are plenty of taxpayers who get a lot less In return for their taxes than many trained monkeys who feel an entitlement to be kept fed, clothed and housed.

      Refused family benefits too 30 yrs ago as we felt the money was better used for others less fortunate and still we were only ever middle income earners.

      So go for it. Pack of pathetic trolls who continue to denigrate those who work hard for a living all the while wanting more for themselves.

      There’s so way you guys run a business, earn a good wage or are rich otherwise you wouldn’t even have posted such pathetic comments.

      Trolling is your sport.

    • Damocles says:

      03:13pm | 28/03/11

      Hello fellow “misfits and oddballs”, now is the time to maintain the RAGE!! NSW today…....QLD next…......AUSTRALIA…...very soon! We deserve better than Gillard and her Labor stooges! The “No Carbon Tax” rallies for us “extremists, loonies, misfits and oddballs” continue, show your support and visit this website http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2011/03/julia-gillards-carbon-tax-folly.html. The Labor machine has plenty of our tax money to mount and mobilise a very strong opposition to the VOICE OF THE PEOPLE! Don’t let them drown you out and take control of this vital debate! Make yourselves heard! Oh, a shocking indicationof our mounting debt under Labor can be viewed here http://www.debtclock.com.au/..........UNBELIEVABLE!! They have to GO!

    • PTom says:

      03:48pm | 28/03/11

      @TimB in this reality where people receive benfits from having access to taxpayer Health and Education. Have you also forgetton that even if you use private you still get taxpayer medicare refund, Private Health insurance rebate, tax refund on education fees and both private health and privates schools recieve taxpayer funding.

      Social welfare can be any government funding to help rich or poor.

      @CD let me get this straight you are attacking people that point out that Middle Australia receives social welfare, neither of which said good or bad. Yep I see the Troll now and it you

    • jeffb says:

      04:58pm | 28/03/11

      Damocles, you realise that debt clock is counting in the billions right? Our GDP is over a trillion per annum, while that debt will probably peak at somewhere between 150-200 billion it is virtually nothing compared to our income. Its a price that while it might be a little high is well worth it considering the consequences of inaction during the GFC.

      My comments early regarding taxes and middle class welfare still stand. Few people understand where their taxes go, most think they get no benefit from them. It doesn’t matter which side of politics holds parliament, quite the opposite is true.

      People should be worried about our economy being so focused on resources, especially coal. The economy of tomorrow is built today, opposing efforts to wean our economy off resources in a world that is making every effort to adopt alternative energy sources is folly. But hey continue on with your rage at issues you don’t fully understand…

    • Phil says:

      07:10pm | 28/03/11

      jeffb Of course 150-200 B isnt much especially when most labor voters will never really contribute anything major towards its repayment.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      06:51am | 28/03/11

      Amazing isn’t it? Howling Paul Howes of the AWU has suddenly stopped howling! What’s the matter? Has he realised that despite his wishes he is not the mighty ALP power-broker he imagines himself to be? The denizens of Sussex Street have been shown up for what they are.
      Howes’ political ambitions will now be at an end. That can only be a good thing for the ALP. The electorate would rightly regard him as political poison.
      Maybe the grass-roots of the ALP will now get the message & take back control of the ALP from all those nameless, faceless women & men who have become the dictatorship which currently runs the ALP.
      Gillard must be preparing herself for self-immolation if only to avoid her political assassination.

    • Dash says:

      07:32am | 28/03/11

      Robert. Absolutely. Paul Howes is a classic example of what is wrong with the ALP. Unless the ALP can distance themselves from the increasingly irrelevant union movement, they are finished!

      My tip for the ALP federally, is Tony Windsor to the rescue. How’s this for an idea? The government unable to backdown from it’s toxic carbon tax and backroom deal with the greens, turn to Windsor to block it in the lower house. They blame him, get the chance to walk away from a pig of a policy and Windsor becomes a hero in his fledgelling electorate. Win win. The greens are left crying in their soup and the ALP hold their hands up and say, “nothing to do with us”. Could that happen?

    • Rosie says:

      07:55am | 28/03/11

      I was wondering the same thing! Where is Paul Howes and Julia Gillard, no where to be seen or heard.

      Yes Robert it was only time for Paul Howes to not only realize that he ain’t no “big kahuna” but shown in black & white that his interference is not needed or wanted! Howes should stick to taking care of his union members and stay out of politics.

      Luke Foley, should be commended for his honesty and what he has said should be heeded by all Labor politicians, including the PM and the team she leads. Federal Labor should forget about the Independents, Greens & Tony Abbott and start governing the Labor way for Australia and its people. ( What will be, will be ) Labor must listen to bring some faith back to the Labor Party and intergrity into any Govt they form.

    • Knemon says:

      09:16am | 28/03/11

      Hear hear Robert - well said. Although I do believe Julia is safe as the ALP leader for the moment, at least until after the next election.  The only thing going for Julia at the minute is the low popularity of Tony Abbott as the preferred PM , it’s like ‘which apple is the least rotten’. What a sad state Australian politics finds itself in.

    • Rosie says:

      10:05am | 28/03/11

      @Knemon

      Have just watched Gillard on TV and unlike Luke Foley who showed remorse in the alienation of his party, the liar Gillard was showing off her negotiating skills by emphasing that Mr O’Farrell was a reasonable man, moderate Liberal whom she knows will be understanding towards the needs of the people of NSW. In other words he will do as I ask! It was an comparison to Tony Abbott and smart people could see what she was up to.

      Gillard, definitely has her head buried in the sand, thinking that the NSW disastrous results had no reflection on what is happening in Canberra with the carbon tax. Barry O’Farell’s coalition on the Election campaign said; “no carbon tax” and in his speech was going to take it to Canberra. We will then see of Gillard’s negotiating skills!

      Also how could Gillard and any Labor supporter explain the unheard of swings to the Coalition in what is known as Labor’s heart land??????? They were historic swings, in one case 30%! It wasn’t just a Liberal or National win but a win of unheard of swings away from the Labor Party!

      Laborites should listen to Luke Foley, the only Labor that has come to terms and is honest with what happened in NSW this weekend before they start the long road to any kind of recovery.

    • Knemon says:

      10:18am | 28/03/11

      Rosie @ 10:05am - I agree Rosie - BUT - people keep avoiding the question on the popularity of Tony Abbott, this is a major problem for the LNP, like it or not.

      I would not hesitate voting for the LNP if Turnbull was made leader, I voted Green at the last election, surely that says something? I’m also certain that I’m not by myself in thinking like that.

    • TCB 24 X 7 says:

      10:36am | 28/03/11

      Wrong Knemon,
      Dont ever forget Abbott was unpopular preferred pm. before the last election, but he still managed to BEAT gillard 73 seats to 72 seats, the 4 amigos is what gave labor power, otherwise she was Defeated.

      P.S. check out my reply about the SILENT MAJORITY ( nsw. repays labor)  labor is in denial about the carbon tax, big mistake. Silent Aussie Majority are a Coming

    • john says:

      10:41am | 28/03/11

      @Robert S McCormick “Howling Paul Howes of the AWU has suddenly stopped howling! What’s the matter?’

      Yeh looks like he’s finished, another one bites the dust. What a joke people voted for him in the first place.

      Elections are just formalities.

    • Rosie says:

      11:04am | 28/03/11

      @ Knemon

      Don’t forget that we are dealing with a Minority Govt and Tony Abbott not Malcolm Turnbull was only 2 votes away from being PM.

      Gillard Labor knows Tony Abbott is a formidable opponent and would welcome instability in a change of leadership within the Opposition.

      Tony Abbott may not be popular with the females as Gillard is, but he is a true Liberal with Liberal core values trying desperately to boot a lying PM out of high office. It isn’t easy to do as Tony Abbott has to deal not only with Gillard Labor but the Independents and the Greens whom no one knows how and what they are thinking most of the time.

      I think Tony Abbott’s mentor, John Howard, was low in the popularity stakes but still managed to win Elections! Australians will do the right thing. As the results of the NSW’s Elections have shown, the Labor party would have been better off if they had lost 4 years ago. Labor wouldn’t have suffered such a historic devasting humilating loss like this country have just witnessed.

    • Vaunted says:

      12:01pm | 28/03/11

      @ TCB 24 X 7: I also wonder about the relevance of the ‘preferred PM’ indicator on popular opinion polls. Although the numbers are often seized upon by ALP adherents as an indicator of what they might probably like to fantasise as Gillard’s popular position, they don’t seem to have any bearing when the actual election takes place. Ditto the random figures showing Abbott vs Turnbull - these are hardly relevant outside the party room, surely.

    • Knemon says:

      01:36pm | 28/03/11

      TCB / Rosie - I do believe that you’re both wearing rose coloured glasses in relation to Abbott. We have continually been told how ‘bad’ things were under the previous government and Abbott still couldn’t knock them off, yes, he got close, but surely given the circumstances, he should have romped it in.

      As for the NSW election, this ‘was’ based on state issues and not only federal issues, for probably two years now, the polls and other commentators have repeatedly shown / said that the NSW ALP were gone, finished, kaput. Is anyone seriously saying that if Gillard had not introduced the carbon tax policy then ALP NSW would have won?

      Gillard now has the toxic monkey of the NSW ALP off her back. O’Farrell had better perform or it could back fire badly. I still believe if Turnbull had led the LNP to the last election then they would now be in government and not in opposition.

      As for the silent majority TCB - I was having a stir with you, you were ‘shouting’ silent majority, get it? wink

    • Rosie says:

      02:59pm | 28/03/11

      Knemon

      “We have continually been told how ‘bad’ things were under the previous government and Abbott still couldn’t knock them off, yes, he got close, but surely given the circumstances, he should have romped it in.”

      First term Govts very seldom get knocked off second time round. If as you say the Rudd Govt was so bad and deserved to be knocked off allowing Tony Abbott’s coalition to romp in, why has Gillard brought back Rudd’s ETS, Mining tax etc?

      We will just have to agree to disagree. I have faith in Tony Abbott and his team and in their integrity to govern if they are meant to.

    • johnny rite says:

      07:21am | 28/03/11

      Well said Robert. They have no intention of changing anything with KKK leering on Saddy might about 100 yeas of good ole working men’s politics and mateship and being the only friend of the downtrodden…crap…but they have no guts for turfing out those crooks who now have their gold teeth and dictate whatever that the real people have had a gut-full of, like Shorten and Howes and Robertson (!!!!!) and Combet and Mr Tebbutt and dear OLD Fergie. For a start, send them to elocution lessons to match their bourgeois ambitions to have houses like Obeid BOUGHT, in every sense of the word.

    • Richard says:

      07:29am | 28/03/11

      Paul Howes is like all Union ;alp dogs, an opportunist. He can talk the talk about asylum seekers and his very strange obsession with John Howard but he will end up in Federal politics sprouting his hatred to at least 50% of Australians whose political opinion differs from his.

      And by the way, isn’t he a Union President who should be spending all his time fighting for the rights of the workers against this corrupt Labor Government? He seems to have views and opinions on everything but the people he represents.

    • Tedd says:

      08:16am | 28/03/11

      Howes is just a Shorten stooge, for Shorten’s sake as much as anything

    • Tubesteak says:

      07:36am | 28/03/11

      It’s very simple. As a resident and taxpayer I’m looking for the following
      - a seat on a bus/train that is on time and clean and goes where I want when I want
      - if I am to use my car I don’t want gridlocked traffic. I want to be able to get there quickly and find abundant parking when I get there
      - I want public amenities
      - I don’t want god-botherers interfering with my freedom(s) of choice
      - I don’t want my tax dollars wasted on parasites whether they be bloated a public service, welfare bludgers or selfish “working families” that want cash handouts for breathing

      Get that right and you’ll forever have my vote.

    • St. Michael says:

      11:54pm | 28/03/11

      Cool.  I can secure your vote with each of the following in response to each item:

      - Completely privatise the bus/train system, because private industry does things better than government on anything bar the commons.
      - Deregulate city planning and rule across all environmental concerns.  You’ll have all the space you want because the skyscrapers will be everywhere, therefore no gridlock of racing rats trying to get to the city.
      - Accept higher rates of tax to pay for them.
      - Accept a Bill of Rights, which has screwed up the US system.
      - Prepare for your public service to be considerably less efficient, less powerful, and in the main staffed by morons.  Less staff does not lead to less productivity because the public service is in service of the commons, and produces nothing.  If you pay peanuts you get monkeys; simple as that.  You can’t have it both ways.  Also, if you want to stop welfare bludging, give the counter officer at Centrelink unbridled discretionary power, without appeal, to determine your claim for benefits and allow him access into your complete financial affairs to make sure you aren’t cheating the system.  Also wipe out all your tax returns forever and eliminate all tax dodges like negative gearing, fringe benefits tax, and capital gains tax concessions on the family home.  And lastly, get back to me with a plan for how all “working families” can somehow be even more productive with less time to spend on their kids.

      Thank you for illustrating why Australian voters are morons.

    • Daryl says:

      07:38am | 28/03/11

      What do people think the Federal government will do about the $2b rail funding they promised NSW? Unlike Gillard and Swan, Barry was transparent and open about his policy intentions. He made it clear that the LNP would build the long neglected North West rail link. And ALP seats went tumbling on the back of that policy. Will the Federal ALP dig their heels in and risk making an already bad situation worse, or will they give NSW the money?

      Given the landslide, I personally think the Federal ALP are going to look really bad if they refuse the funding.

    • CD says:

      03:14pm | 28/03/11

      Daryl in the Australian this morning Gillard has refused the funding change as she says Labor promised the people Epping link.

      Not in NSW myself but surely the money should go to the most needed link not the most pre election popular link?

      Again with the spin I believe. You can just read through the BS now and I find it disheartening. Somehow I don’t believe Barry will lay down and take much though.

    • Daryl says:

      04:45pm | 28/03/11

      CD, the issue here is that the North West of the city is the largest growth area and if you look at the rail lines, it’s the area where there is no rail. The issue has been that the North West link was canned by the ALP largely due to the fact that it services blue ribbon Liberal territory.

      The north west link is the most needed link as it will service the area that has been neglected by the ALP and the area that needs it the most. It will also impact the most people.

      My point is that this was a clear election issue for which the people have voted. Federal ALP are playing games. They refuse to put money into a Liberal area because they only govern for ALP areas. You only have to look at what Bob Carr did with the road tolls. If you use the M7 which travels through ALP heartland (or at least it use to be their heartland) you got a rebate. If you use the M2 which travels through Liberal heartland you pay the full toll.

      This is the kind of crap the ALP has dished up to the people of NSW and a big reason why they have been destroyed by voters. If you look at who stands to be compensated under the carbon tax, it’s ALP heartland at the expense of everyone else. The ALP has no shame!

    • ALP Supporter of the Past says:

      07:43am | 28/03/11

      Forgetting the 16 year (is to long) rubbish in this article, the rest is correct, however:

      1.  The whole 2010 ALP National Review Report delivered by Carr, Bracks and Faulkner has to be made public.  The NSW election is directly relevant to the report as the NSW Right and its clones were the architects of the 2010 federal election disaster for the ALP.

      2.  John Robinson is not the answer to Labors problems in NSW.  He is part of the problem.  He will always have over his head Paul Keating’s prophetic letter of 27th October 2008 which has proved right so far.  Remember Keatings statement in the letter:
      “Let me tell you, if the Labor Party’s stocks ever get so low as to require your services in its parliamentary leadership it will itself have no future”.

      3.  John Robinson was hypocritically silent when the NSW Electricity was finally sold last year and proved what a machine man he was, just like the rest of them.

      4.  Bruce Walker is dreaming.  The bloodletting, as he calls it (on ABCNEWS), will not have a time limit or be completed until the job is done, both state and federal.  There have been many good State ALP members who have lost their seats through no fault of their own other than their failure to go against party discipline, to their massive detriment in this case.

      5.  The likes of Eddie Obeid, Karl Bitar, Mark Arbib, Bill Shorten and various other AWU plants have to be the first to be shown the door of obscurity for the ALP to even begin their period of recovery.

    • Dave says:

      07:59am | 28/03/11

      Don’t let the door hit your arse on the way out, Luke Foley. Your time is over. You and your union mates have been condemned to irrelevancy. The next time labor has a chance of winning the state election won’t be before the toddlers of today are old enough to vote.

    • Mary Thompson says:

      08:00am | 28/03/11

      Change to what? The thing that needs change is for politiucal Parties to be outlawed so elected members have to represent their electorates. Until that happens we just get more of what Every State and Territory are sick to death of. Abuse and greedy people taking what is ours for nothing.

      They have the gall to calll a vote a “conscience” vote when a topic is really tough.

      Every vote must be a conscience vote, but not the conscience of the elected official. The conscience of thye people he or she represents. These elected people think winning means their thoughts are valuable. They are not.

    • ALP Supporter of the Past says:

      11:47am | 28/03/11

      I’m with you Mary, in theory, however it is simplistic. 

      In practice, it would end up like Italy if parliament was made up of independents.  Basically unmanagable.

    • Vaunted says:

      08:02am | 28/03/11

      Paul Keating’s concept of “the conscientious business of governance” has all but evaporated at every level of the Australian Labor Party; State and Federal. As much as I disliked Keating’s style when he was Prime Minister, I’d prefer him to any of the present bunch of manipulative, self-intersted, lying ferrets. My honourable, decent, old-school Labor father-in-law must be spinning in his grave.

    • Maginthatey says:

      09:33am | 28/03/11

      Agree Vaunted….currently, there would not be one politician in Australia, at any level of government, that would be allowed to carry Paul Keating’s bags into parliament house!! - I would give my back teeth to see Keating and Abbott going at it in question time now.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      09:58am | 28/03/11

      Youtube search Keating on Abbott for a taste of what might have been. Not as memorable as the tip and no iceberg line but still showing Keating is world class at the political smackdown

    • Vaunted says:

      12:59pm | 28/03/11

      It’s hard to overlook that when Keating lost to Howard and still won his seat in parliament, he chose to never face parliament again, a bit slack if you ask me. That aside, PK is an effective and caustic orator although sometimes bully, but conducted himself as PM with a degree of respect for the office and usually could be relied on to act in a manner that might be construed as being his sincerely-held view of what was in the interests of the nation. I reckon if you want to know what’s broken with today’s ALP look no further than the current crop of shallow, self-serving political opportunists, from Gillard down. They behave like a pack of undergraduate radicals and let’s face it, you’re hard-pressed to find one of them that’s ever held down a real job, much less operated or managed a business. And as for the up-and-comers, look no further than the scheming, pontificating and opportunistic Paul Howes; life experience + respect quotient = zero. Something has to change but it won’t be me helping do it. I’m gone already.

    • Maginthatey says:

      02:08pm | 28/03/11

      @ Vaunted - They’re all tarred with the same brush as far as I’m concerned…have a look at how long it took them to get their pay rise through last week - less than twenty minutes, they all make me vomit. - but I do sorely miss PJ Keating, more for the fun of Question time.

    • Jesse says:

      08:12am | 28/03/11

      I walked away from the ALP on Saturday for the first time in my life. I voted for the Greens and didn’t preference anyone. They were lucky I did that, if Sussex St operates in the same way they did over the last few years then they will never ever get my preference, I will move it to the Coalition.

      John Robertson, Karl Bitar, Mark Arbib, and Paul Howes are hacks, who I want to see the back of. Credit to Keneally for trying to keep these idiots in check for 15 months. A warning if the Labor doesn’t change, you’re not getting my vote. This was a bad government, they did some great things and over the last few years, they had high unemployment, development was getting better, but that didn’t matter. Internally it was disgusting how they conducted themselves.

      I’m glad this government is out of my life, I’m so glad they are, and they are out of my life for 12 years to regroup, and fix up their mess. Sadly Carmel Tebbutt is not running for leader, and she’s the one who deserves to stay on as leader and who can lead the party forward. Someone from the left, not from the poisonous right.

    • Paul says:

      08:22am | 28/03/11

      Luke still hasn’t got it.
      He’s still spouting the spin.
      Face it Luke,  the hard core of Labor’s leaders and backroom boys are men (rarely women) who have never been one of the ‘workers’ they place their hand on their heart and claim to represent.
      They rise through the party or union ranks, manipulating all the way.
      Party power being their only goal, and once in power hanging on is their only motivation.
      They use their union arm to bully business to ensure they get a cut of union dues from workers, many of whom have never been Labor supporters but have to pay up anyway.
      The last thing Labor gives Australians, is a fair go.

    • Eliza says:

      08:27am | 28/03/11

      I was raised to vote Labor or my grandparents would turn in her grave. Labor’s culture was always union hack dominated. As a government employee I’ve endured enough of their stand-over tactics, their unimpeded assisted pathway to political over-influence, to turn my stomach. 
      Labor is sickeningly worse nowadays. They are conveniently Green-infected, and Marxist driven. With their nonsensical gender-equity propensities, Labor lurches from one mess to another.
      Not in order, Labor’s notorious MP’s from their policy of endorsing token females have been:
      Ros Kelly (of whiteboard economic mismanagement fame), Carmen Lawrence (of foot in mouth fame), Cheryl Kernot (of Gareth Evans affair and defection-to-Labor then onwards to help stuff up the seat of Dixon fame),  Joan Kirner (who left Victoria deeply buried-in-debt fame), Anna Bligh (of total government mismanagement fame, but found time for her self-promotional women’s mag spread a week after the flood misery), child-premier of Tasmania Lara Giddings (who helped knife Premier Bartlett who formed government with two Greens after his pre-election lie that dealing with the Greens would be akin to dealing with the devil).  Kirsty Marshall (whose outstanding contribution was breastfeeding her 11-day old infant in parliament), the ABC’s Maxine McKew (of never-seen-again fame during her one-term) Christina Keneally who led Labor to its humiliating historical annihilation and last year pictured giggling like juvenile schoolgirls with Juliar Gillard.  AND Juliar Gillard - the worst, most distrusted, lying, changeable, shrieking, disloyal, incompetent Labor failure in the history of Australian politics. Less competent than Whitlam but at least he was dignified.
      They were all hand-picked, gender-biased Labor embarrassments.
      You give the levers to one more union hack, one more token gender-equity incompetent woman, and Labor will be long-term history.

      Oh. and don’t forget that outstanding Labor woman Belinda Neal (of “don’t you know who I am” restaurant arrogance fame).

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      09:18am | 28/03/11

      That is a super post, but I’d have to disagree with including Kirner. She was put in after Cain to lose the election, so that Labor could then put in the leader they wanted. Maybe they picked her because she was a woman, but the economic mismanagement preceeded her tenure.

    • Phil says:

      10:32am | 28/03/11

      Eliza. Great post. You are do right.

    • Stiffy says:

      10:47am | 28/03/11

      Labor should drop their gender biased rule. If they are to thrive politically again in NSW then they need to pre-select on true merit. KK is a perfect example. Got there because of her marriage. The Libs & Nats pick candidates on merit and can still find plenty of room for women MPs.

    • AdamC says:

      08:44am | 28/03/11

      Mea Culpae are fine, but why has the NSW ALP waited until this catastrophic rejection by the electorate before trying to reform itself to be a better option for the people of NSW. For at least two years, and probably more, the NSW Labor government has been the most reviled government since, as Tony Abbott so eloquently put it, the times of Governor Bligh.

      And there was never any doubt as to why everyone hated the now defunct NSW government. It was too close to vested interests; it failed to deliver projects within cooee of time or budget; it was controlled by unelectable snakemen in the back rooms and, finally, it failed to properly respond to growth needs of Sydney. 

      You can reform your internal party machine as much as you want, but the fact is nobody forced the former NSW government to be so egregious in its many failures. What the ALP actually needs to do is convince voters that, given another shot at power, they won’t do the same thing again.

    • PTom says:

      10:01am | 28/03/11

      Because faction did not believe they where doing wrong. No matter what people where telling them,they should have reformed under Rees.

      How many Liberal party members saw the defeat of John Howard in 2005 but refused to reform?

    • Sony B Goode says:

      10:09am | 28/03/11

      Labor is stuck in ideology at the expensive of reality. This is why we end up with near empty $500m tway bus lanes while traffic sits backed up next to them for miles during peak hour.

      Labor is stuck in the rhetoric of class warfare and cannot be trusted to be competent managers of our cities, states or country.

    • AdamC says:

      03:20pm | 28/03/11

      @PTom, I don’t think you can liken JWH circa 2007 to the Iemma/Rees/Keneally circus 2011. The scale is totally different.

      I also see that the NSW ALP are proposing to elect John Robertson, one of the most venemous snakemen in the ALP viper pit - the man who helped to engineer the assassination of Morris Iemma - as opposition leader. They have clearly learnt nothing.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      08:53am | 28/03/11

      That’s the hard part isn’t it? Keeping the party’s political soul. You can see the same thing beginning here in SA. Its now got to the point where the unions are actively campaigning against Labor and the only policy they seem to have anymore is cutting workers rights. Add that to the same perception you had in NSW (that the party is in bed with dirty money) one wonders if the sitting MP’s even care about the party at all or are just sticking their snouts in the trough until closing time.

      This is Labor’s big internal problem – the MP’s have actually gone to war with the membership. If it doesn’t change there won’t be much of a party left in a decade.

    • Sony B Goode says:

      11:01am | 28/03/11

      @hot tub: this is the core cognitive dissonance inherent in a party whose core ideology is a war on prosperity whilst trying to survive in a prosperous society.

      What next can Labor tax to fund its social utopia? How about CO2 which we all exhale?

      What new social program can Labor dream up to squander tax payer dollars?

      The union have campaigned hard to make directors criminally liable for accidents in the work place, must be time to make politicians criminally liable for policies which cost lives like Gareth’s burning roofs insulation disaster.

      Responsible management practice doesn’t seem to be an arrow in the toolkit of the Laborite ideological warrior.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      12:33pm | 28/03/11

      The answer of course is quite simple. Welfare should be for those who need it, not for middle class home owners. Its pretty shocking when you realise the amount of government funding your average Australian family receives. When you consider indirect benefits it gets even more freakish. Like you said it’s a prosperous society – so why the hell do we give welfare to the gainfully employed?

      With the insulation fires I agree with you that Labor was irresponsible. But if that whole debacle taught us anything its that private business can be just as bad at management as anything the government can stoop to. We are talking about dodgy operators refusing to follow safety guidelines and putting both their employees and the homeowners at risk. Can you imagine that? Happily putting your own employee, the guy/girl you see everyday and whose husband/wife you met at Christmas in that level of danger? It kinda makes a case for a political party which supporters workers rights – too bad the party that used to do that is now the party of corruption.

    • Lachlan says:

      09:15am | 28/03/11

      Luke, please move to the Lower House, your talents will be wasted in the Upper House. You proved on Saturday night to be one of the few warriors of the Labor tradition left: an honest, accountable and realistic individual.

    • Al Chunk says:

      09:18am | 28/03/11

      Luke - there should have been courage to fight for change before the election.  It’s no use closing the barn door after the snakes have killed the horse, it just leaves snakes.

    • CSAllen says:

      10:15am | 28/03/11

      Tony- Labor were stopped at the 11th hour in NSW from handing out fake ‘how to vote’ cards as well.

    • CSAllen says:

      09:27am | 28/03/11

      it’s fantastic that you lost even though you tried every dirty trick in the book. At my local polling place (Queenscliff surf club- good luck winning that seat!) the Labor candidate, Jennifer Jary, had her poster firmly placed on the table with a Greens banner splashed across it. Not only did this make you think that she was the Greens candidate for the area, but her poster was a completely different colour to the one of Keneally on the ground next to the table. I have a photo of it that I sent in to the SMH. How can you expect people to vote for your party when your candidates don’t even want to be associated with their leader and would rather masquerade as a Green candidate to try to get some sneaky uneducated votes? Disgusting and good riddance.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      09:52am | 28/03/11

      I saw this happen in various seats in the last Federal election - what’s with the green shirts? 
       
      And in SA, of course, the ALP dress their hacks in light blue and hand out fake how-to-vote cards. Hardly the actions of an honest, credible party.

    • Dave Donaldson says:

      09:33am | 28/03/11

      I agree with Adnav.People are sick and tired of waking up and having to swallow lies from the left wing galloots day in day out.  People are preparing to draw and quarter this mob,the voter will eventually wake up to the lies,and Gillard will fall hard like the NSW lefties on saturday.
      Yes and I am one of the extremists that went to the anti-co2 rally and I can proudly say that I did not witness even a hint of violence,oh and there was not a sceric of rubbish to be seen.  Not bad for a bunch of misfits and extremists. Dave Donaldson.

    • MDMConnell says:

      09:57am | 28/03/11

      Luke deserves some credit for getting past Step One: talking the talk about “change” and “renewal”.

      But talk is cheap. After every election loss we see the losing party pledge to “reconnect” and “listen”, but nothing ever changes. Two weeks of platitudes, two months of navel gazing, then back to normal again.

      What, specifically, does Luke recommend the party do to make this a meaningful change and not just more spin?

    • PTom says:

      10:11am | 28/03/11

      Luke,
      You are right one major reform is democratise, one good way to get more people in involved, by including some of KK suggestion like pre-selection votes of local candiates.

    • Sony B Goode says:

      10:22am | 28/03/11

      Labors problem is much deeper and is based on its core ideology which is so disconnected from reality that its policies can’t deliver without ever expanding aggressive taxation.

      A government that wastes $500m on a couple of tway bus lanes whilst traffic sits backed up for miles alongside will never be a competent manager because it is completely blinded by its class warfare rhetoric.

      In this example a social traffic solution is considered better by Labor over more car lanes because its ideology forces it into narrowthink. The reality is that the $500m tway bus lanes are not appropriate and sit virtually unused whilst traffic backups next to them for miles. A total disconnect between ideology and reality.

      Class warfare rhetoric is not a substitute for scientific and sound management practice.

    • PTom says:

      11:48am | 28/03/11

      Sony,
      Which reality do you live in? If you think more cars on the roads would be better.

      The reason bus lane where created had nothing to do with your class warfare. It is about getting more people to the city faster.

    • johnny rite says:

      10:12am | 28/03/11

      Dear MARLEY: You are so correct but totally oblivious to the fact that the Labor bunch is not only DUMB BUT they are also CORRUPT. And many of therm are still there federally !!!!!!!

    • Time for change says:

      10:13am | 28/03/11

      Luke is correct and did a great job on the TV on Saturday night. 

      The ALP has to change.  Union membership is down to 10 percent, but the unions still control the ALP.

      You can’t be a union controlled political party in a post-union society and expect to win elections.

    • MMR March 28 2011 says:

      10:41am | 28/03/11

      Labor will return to office as soon as it can.
      After all, the Liberal Party and Liberal Party paid Labor in spades rather than in diamonds, in clubs or in hearts.

    • PatC says:

      10:52am | 28/03/11

      Ashes to Ashes
      Dust to Dust
      If your leaders can’t guide you
      The voters must
      RIP - Australia Labor Party

    • Sony B Goode says:

      11:17am | 28/03/11

      Luke: “fair go for all and a decent life for everyone”.

      This is the big Labor disconnect, a war on prosperity in a prosperous society.

      The result is aggressive taxation used to fund ridiculous ideologically driven programs that have little basis in the working lives of the vast majority.

      This “fair go” seems to be the soft version of “social justice” and “equity”.

      All federal Labor has achieved in office is look for easy targets to raise tax,  so it can try to buy votes from an underclass which no longer exists and no longer funds money into unions.

      Times have changed; Labor doesn’t stand for anything that has any basis in a modern prosperous society. Its ideological narrowness means it has no possibility of sound and scientific management outcomes in a highly connected modern world.

    • Squeeze says:

      01:20pm | 28/03/11

      “ideologically driven programs” are fine.  It’s how you implement them and how far you go that’s the problem.  The left’s story is written on the moral high ground. Fighting inequity with inequity to try to take/hold the moral high ground.  That’s where the left always falls over. In the the end you get voter ICB (I call bullshit - thanks for that one Tory)

    • TCB 24 X 7 says:

      11:49am | 28/03/11

      Labor you are in denial,
      Aussies are Disgusted in the way gillard is leading this Country.
      You have stopped listening to the MAJORITY.but you will be Reminded that the Aussie Majority are the bottom line.
                    Labor under gillard has definetely lost its way.

    • Glen says:

      12:17pm | 28/03/11

      Will Labor learn anything? Throw in more union heavies! Add a few Green policies! Joe for PM (Tripodi)! You get the idea. They won’t learn anything.

      At least 8 years of LNP. Sweet.

    • John says:

      12:55pm | 28/03/11

      They’ll have a review like the Carr,Faulkner, Bracks review but they won’t ask people like me, life long members who have been members for more decades than I care to dwell on, why we have left the party in recent years. Too many bloody millionaires running the show, Hawke, millionaire, Keeting, millionaire, Rudd, millionaire, it used to be the workers/battlers party now it’s barely to left of of the Liberals, can’t tell the difference.

    • thetrureal says:

      01:57pm | 28/03/11

      The failures to come from Baillieu and O’Farrell will guarantee severe losses for the Liberals at federal and state levels at the next elections.

      People have voted for the Liberals out of anger rather than policies, so when they fail, what will that anger transform into?

      If you think it is worse now, just wait for the future. A change of government won’t do squat. The whole political system and the whole financial systems has to be changed. But it will continue as it is until we all hit bottom!

    • Karen from Qld says:

      02:16pm | 28/03/11

      And yet the cleaner who will be getting long service leave will be struggling to make ends meet when the full impact of the Carbon Dioxide Tax takes effect. What a great party give with on hand and take it back with interest with the other.

    • PTom says:

      03:59pm | 28/03/11

      That one tenth of a cent increase in her cost of goods , special when she also get a tax cuts or government rebate.

    • Against the Man says:

      03:06pm | 28/03/11

      The NSW election has highlighted a few issues. Looking through the newspaper editorials and speaking to some political people over the weekend this is the cold, hard reality.

      1) The poor showing of Independents clearly shows that Windsor and Okenshotinthefoot have destroyed the credibility of Independent candidates everywhere. I feel sorry for them and their legacy of shame.

      2) The flood levy and carbon tax was an issue and they have sent Gilltard a clear message. She is in trouble.

      3) The ALP power brokers aka faceless men have only a few weeks to ‘fix’ up Federal Labor. Either fire Gilltard now to prevent a voter massacre of Labor in a few years or come up with some great policies to show the people that Labor are ace. But seeing that the ALP couldn’t come up with credible policy to save their souls, I have a feeling Gilltard might not be getting a nice pension…............

    • Ryan says:

      03:23pm | 28/03/11

      I don’t think the ALP needs the courage to change, they just need the logic to accept their place and call it a day.  In a time when trade unions were there for peoples rights and benefit, absolutely.  When in the present the major unions (apart from police, teaching, nursing etc.) are nothing but corrupt, greedy, political machines for lazy workers who try get out of doing as much as they should or to a standard they should - it’s time to call it a day and admit you aren’t in it for the Australian public, just a greedy minority.

    • PTom says:

      04:13pm | 28/03/11

      Such angry from a person direct at a so-called greedy minority that lead the way in setting 4 weeks leave when you want, long service, sick leave, parental leave, overtime, 40 hour weeks, unemployment benefits, redundancy pay outs, old-age pension and veteran widows pension, so what did the take away from again?

    • bobw says:

      10:52pm | 28/03/11

      “Call it a day” - brilliant idea, Ryan!  The two party system has been pretty awesome, so surely a one party system would be even better!  All the best countries have one, after all!  Actually, why not just abolish the states and establish a new royal bloodline starting with Alex Hawke?  King Alex I of Australia!  There shouldn’t be any pesky reds amongst his descendants.  While we’re at it, we should also ban one of Woolworths and Coles - you can choose which, Ryan.  Choice is good in theory, but in practice having even two options just makes things too damn confusing!

      “Call it a day”.  LOL.

    • S.L says:

      03:36pm | 28/03/11

      Luke I’ve always been a Labor voter (reading some of my older posts prove this) but as I don’t belong to a trade union (even though my businesses are blue collar) I have no hope of representing the party I’ve always supported if I had political ambitions. While I support the ideals of the union movement, their numbers are dwindling as fast as Labor’s and your bosses are isolating so many that would be a credit to the party.
      One thing I find fascinating though is everyone including the usual conservative flag wavers in the media are asking why people turned their backs on Labor, not congratulating Barry O’Farrel on a well run campaign.
      Labor lost….....the Libs didn’t win! That’s a big point in my view….....

    • CSAllen says:

      03:49pm | 28/03/11

      S.L- an inch or a mile mate a win is a win.

    • PTom says:

      04:20pm | 28/03/11

      Can you tell Abbott and his supporters that.

    • Joombi O'Flaherty says:

      07:48pm | 28/03/11

      Ha PTom - nice work there! Funny how it’s “an inch or a mile” in one direction and an “affront to democracy” when it comes to the feds winning by negotiating with independants

    • michael j says:

      03:50pm | 28/03/11

      The only change you have to make is go back to being fair-dinkum
      Socialist party ,and not this lily livered arse grabbing rot that Hawke,n,Keating started
      you are not going to get your power base back (the starving workers ) by bringing in more taxes and racing off to the toilet every time the mining industry says BOO and throws a lazy few hundred million at the tv screen saying they will their jobs and drag-lines to Africa with bondy,,You had your chance you could have told these foreign companies to piss off,
      You no longer have the will or capacity to change at any level from local to federal government,,you really don’t care about the 1/3 of Australian’s living in poverty,you just want your super to go up,,

    • TheRealDave says:

      04:35pm | 28/03/11

      ‘Courage to Change’ - my arse. Its articles like this why Labor is loosing ground. How hard is it for you knuckleheads in the backroom to wake up to yourselves and acknowledge that we no longer have a choice of the Pro-Business Liberal Party and the ‘For the Working Man’ Labor Party. That crap died decades ago with cool beer ads and meat pies on teh hill at the footy. Too many university educated ‘advisors’ and ‘union’ morons getting their way at the expense of the actual working families they are allegedly sticking up for. Its Big L Suits versus Little L Suits nowadays.

      Courage to change?!?! You are exactly the problem. How about instead of ‘Courage to Change’ you actual take a read of the Labor Party history and ethos and ‘Do the right bloody thing’ and REPRESENT those that vote for you….just as a wild change.

    • Kersten says:

      05:24pm | 28/03/11

      It’s not only NSW Labor that needs reform Luke. To be blunt, the entire party is redundant and corrupt. The only saving grace for you lot is that the Liberals aren’t that much better. Although that grace hasn’t done much saving in NSW I suppose.

      The only reason we’re seeing anything like this article is that Labor lost. There was no way in hell anyone functioning in a current representative role was going to admit the problems inside Labor while the times were good. It’s a bit like a 5 year old apologising for being caught eating Mum’s lollies without asking….not because they’re sorry they did it, but rather that they were caught.

    • Emily says:

      07:52pm | 28/03/11

      Look at the suburbs left having a Labor MP.  They are the worst suburbs of Sydney.  Here stay the most disadvantaged people.  Some are new migrants, some are young people starting up.  Fine, work hard and you will advance.  Some may be poor because of their health or mental illness, again may not be your fault (you could have taken too much drugs, smoked too much, then no sympathy for you).  But there are those who were lazy as a child, unruly as teenager, who just wasted their youth to advance themselves, well, it is entirely your own making, you cannot blame anyone else.
      So, is the Labor party really just a loser party?

    • Harryn says:

      08:32pm | 28/03/11

      They lost their way? At federal level? <Gillard>
      They lost their way? At state level?  <Kenneally>
      An 8-year old has GPS on their basic phones which will get them home!
      These are adults who “lost their way”“???
      Morons.
      And no Mark Arbib, it’s not the “It’s Time” Factor.
      It was actually the “It’s Mark Arbib” factor.
      It was actually the “It’s Karl Bitar” factor.
      It was actually the “It’s the Joe Tripodi” factor.
      It was actually the “It’s Eddie Obied” factor.
      It was actually the “Mafioso running the Parliament” factor!
      You may act innocent and/or deluded, but you know you and your clique were one of the main factors.

    • China says:

      01:25am | 29/03/11

      Can they please start by getting rid of Bruce Hawker?? I’ve seen more upstanding looking types trying to flog me a 1995 Commadore on Parramatta Road.

    • Ricky says:

      10:26am | 29/03/11

      he coward Sartor on the ABc last night complained of corruption in the Suusex Street office while he was Planning minister and tried to explaintnhat it was Sussex Street driving developement authority directly linked to “HUGE” donations made to the ALP by developers. Sartor then went on to say that he discussed this situation with the premiere on 2 occasions and also complained that he was not part of the inner circle making decisions. When this coward was asked why he did nothing in the face of corruption his answer was “The Labor party doesn’t forget who speaks out about the ALP from inside the party”. What a cowardly, arrogant selfish B*stard. He is now living the high life on a publicly funded pension for the rest of his life while he in his own words watched and oversaw corruption to the higest level of the ALP back office. Just proves one thing The ALP is for itself and itself only, bugger the people is the new ALP Mantra.

    • Edward James says:

      11:16am | 29/03/11

      Luke people have reacted to the 16 years of your Labor Parties misgovernance. While Labor Party members including you wandered about ignoring those people, some of whom spent years standing outside NSW Parliament. With signs complaining about systemic abuse and corruption being accommodated by your government. Your constituents were watching and taking notice of what was being ignored by politicians.  On New Years Eve 2011 I was there for all those revelers who walked up Macquarie Street after the fireworks to see, I was there for the last time, protesting outside NSW State Parliament your place of business MP Foley. You are still in Parliament and have never given any overt support to me or my community. Not one politician spoke to my father who spent a day in his hospital bed outside NSW Parliament back in 2007 such a political shame which will never be forgotton. I have spent over four hundred days during the last eleven years publicizing the fact that successive Parliaments are quite comfortable with the extent of political sins committed by politicians against their constituents. While I am pleased to have spent tens of thousands of dollars in full page advertising over years working for a change of government. I worry that the 55th Parliament may yet prove to be more of the same misgovernance. I hope all those hundreds of thousands of people who voted for change understand they now need to keep a very close watch on their elected reps making sure there is no sign of backsliding into the discredited Labor ways.  Link to political attack ads http://bit.ly/EJ_PNewsAds  Corruption I have publicly identified as accommodated by our elected representatives at all three levels of government.
      Edward James 0243419140

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter