Call it second sight. Call it bullshit. I know the exact moment when Tom Cruise decided he’d have Katie Holmes.

She never stood a chance…

It was in the excellent 2005 movie, “Batman Begins”. Ms Holmes, playing public attorney Rachel Dawes, is strapped in a basement in a tight, heaving dress. The diabolical Dr Jonathon Crane stands over her wearing a creepy hessian mask.

She looked extraordinary. But it was Tom Cruise, not Batman, who decided to rescue her.

Not long after this, the news came through that they became an item. I remember thinking: “That poor girl.”

Some years before, I had an insight into what happens when Tom Cruise wants something. In this case, it was Nicole Kidman. It came from someone who was well-placed to gain firsthand knowledge of Mr Cruise’s courtship of Ms Kidman.

This person described how Tom would ring and ring and ring and ring Nicole, all day, all night, telling her how much he loved her. She would receive up to 20 deliveries of flowers each day.

She simply didn’t have enough vases.

The way it was described to me, he was “passionate” and “wonderful”. To me, he sounded like a right pain in the arse.

It was a comprehensive love bombing. Ten years later, Mr Cruise sacked Ms Kidman, citing irreconcilable differences. She later said something meek about not wanting to raise their kids as Scientologists.

New York’s Village Voice conducted a bit of an investigation recently and found that Ms Kidman, a Catholic, had actually succeeded in keeping her husband’s involvement in Scientology during their 10-year marriage to a minimum.

Mr Cruise, meanwhile, was under heavy pressure to resume his Scientology connections and indeed became once again fully engaged in the cult immediately after the divorce.

According to the Village Voice, a very senior Scientology defector named Marty Rathbun was, in late 2003, travelling in a vehicle with Mr Cruise and David Miscavige, who has been described as the “absolute dictator” of the Scientology cult.

The discussion was about how Arnold Schwarzenegger had just become governor of California.

“Miscavige was driving, and Tom Cruise was in the passenger seat,” Rathbun told the Village Voice. “I was sitting behind Miscavige, and Michael Doven (another Scientologist) was sitting behind Cruise.

“At some point, Tom said, ‘If Arnold can become governor, I can become president.’ And Miscavige got really excited and said, ‘Absolutely!’”

This, by all accounts, was not a lighthearted conversation, but a serious discussion.

Protestant America is currently trying to adapt to the notion that a Mormon, Mitt Romney, might become president.

Is it possible that Mr Cruise, believed to be a Democrat, wants to become the first Scientologist president? Say, in 2016?

This is where all this is going, I’m sure of it. To the White House.

And if so, no American can say they weren’t warned. Especially Ms Holmes. This is what Mr Cruise said in 2004, the year before he carpet love-bombed her: “Some people, well, if they don’t like Scientology, well, then, fuck you. Really. Fuck you. Period.”

Presumably she played along for a while, smiling, listening, and weeping privately in the bathroom, unable to tell anyone that one of the world’s biggest stars (her husband) was a grinning extremist.

But then a child came along. Ms Holmes had to start thinking for two.

And this is the kind of deluded, fanatical comments Mr Cruise was making to the press about Scientology during the time of their marriage, in 2008: “We are the authorities on getting people off drugs. We are the authorities on the mind. We are the authorities on improving conditions. We can rehabilitate criminals. We can bring peace and unite cultures.”

I won’t bother you with how Scientologists believe their life mission is to get “clear” from the Thetans that invade the spirits of Earthlings after they crash-landed on a planet during some sort of intergalactic carnage involving the warlord Xenu, some 75 millions years ago.

The Wikipedia sites on Scientology are very thorough and seem to be managed by renegades who are determined to prevent more people from being “audited” by the cult.

Ms Holmes appears to have finally figured out that her husband was for real. According to reports, she was trying to prevent him from sending their young daughter Suri into a Scientology education camp, to begin her brainwashing.

You can imagine the conversations around the Cruise-Holmes household.

Tom: “Darling, Suri’s got another Thetan.”

Katie: “No, Tom, she needs her nappy changed.”

Ms Holmes staged a careful escape while her husband was in Iceland filming, and came to New York to file for divorce.

Clearly, a face-to-face confrontation with Mr Cruise would have been hard work. Anyone who’s ever seen his deranged performance on Oprah Winfrey’s couch would realise he’d be a difficult man to withstand when he got on a roll.

Why do I care? Because Ms Holmes is my new neighbour. She lives two streets away, on Seventh Avenue, in lower midtown Manhattan. I would be remiss not to care.

Of course, I’m worried about whoever will become Mrs Tom Cruise the Fourth. But the really frightening thing would be a mass American conversion to Scientology.

It is in all our interests that President Cruise be stopped.

tooheyp@newsltd.com.au

Most commented

59 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • TracyH says:

      09:04am | 08/07/12

      That sort of courtship behaviour would ring massive alarm bells in any rational woman. It’s text book sociopathy.

    • Rose says:

      01:09pm | 08/07/12

      That’s exactly right, that behaviour is stalkerish and indicates some one trying to control you. If that happened to my daughters I would tell them to be afraid, be very afraid!!

    • Michael says:

      05:04pm | 08/07/12

      Which text book would that be smile

    • Fiona says:

      09:03pm | 08/07/12

      Michael, DSM V???

    • Audra Blue says:

      07:44pm | 09/07/12

      Agreed.  A keen man is a good man, but being bombarded like that is just creepy and shows desperation.  Any obsessive behaviour is nasty, even if it comes in fragrant form.  Tom seems to court his potential wives like he’s on a tight schedule.  He’s still in his prime so the women will be convinced, but can you imagine him as 70 year old guy trying to woo a 20 something?

      Creepy and wrong.

    • CD says:

      09:07am | 08/07/12

      I’m wondering if Scientology fixes everything why has Tommy boy taken a 3 go around on marriages?  Sure didn’t fix that did it?

      Great read Paul.

    • Mel says:

      12:13pm | 09/07/12

      Clearly it fixed his inability to father children with his first two wives ...

    • Bob Stewart, the Elder says:

      09:18am | 08/07/12

      I just had a thetan

    • Traxster says:

      10:57am | 08/07/12

      One thetan to go Sir…...
      would you like fries with that ?

    • Carolyn says:

      11:07am | 08/07/12

      Scientology is on the nose! I best use the bathroom each morning prior to my flatmate partaking in his ‘TSS’ ritual…..no, nothing to do with The Southport School, but Thetan, Shower and Shave! What airfreshener would cover that odour? Glade? Glen 20?? A lit match??

    • Dann Da Mann says:

      12:10pm | 08/07/12

      Thomas Cruise Mapother IV   AKA   Tom Cruise appears to be a slight bit psycho,control freak,selfish and a total Egomaniac. This dude is a B Grade actor
      making B Grade movies for the gullible fans. he just lives and breaths the cult of Scientology and to have custody of daughter Suri is a Definite Danger to a naive innocent child. I was never a fan of Katie Holmes but I support her 100 percent in divorcing this weirdo due to endangerment to a minor. He does not like being embarrassed or told what to do except by his manwife(as he is known as) the CEO David Miscavige, who went on cruise and Katies Honeymoon which is over the top.You hang in there Katie and fight fire with fire and do not be afraid of the petulant little man boy. Now I will go and have a big thetan after writing this .

    • Richard says:

      12:15pm | 08/07/12

      I have enjoyed every single one of your articles on the punch, Paul Toohey, until today. You have cast Tom Cruise as the ultimate villain in a mythology that exists only in your mind.

      Every one is entitled to their own religious beliefs, even those people who subscribe to minority religious beliefs, and they are entitled to instruct their children in those religious beliefs. This is the way human families and societies have interacted throughout all history. Religious faith is a personal aspect of people’s lives, and even if we don’t like a particular religious faith, we must allow each other the liberty to hold our beliefs and teach our children our ways.

      Tom Cruise is an assertive, dominant man, and serves a strong role model for the rest of us men of how to have frame control and confidence (although he could deal with more composure). I look up to the excellent guy, and I feel sorry for him that his family broke down.

    • Greg says:

      02:51pm | 08/07/12

      I think it’s unfortunate that it’s socially acceptable to brainwash children about any religion/cult (the only difference that I can discern between the two terms is size and/or time since it was invented). Just because it is currently and historically has been socially acceptable doesn’t mean it’s right.

      Children shouldn’t be told such nonsense until they’re old enough to realize that their parents/other authority figures aren’t always right and are able to critically analyze the claims being made against the evidence and logic.

    • Bertramd says:

      03:26pm | 08/07/12

      “Tom Cruise… serves a strong role model for the rest of us men… I look up to the excellent guy…”

      Clearly a troll.

    • Inky says:

      03:29pm | 08/07/12

      A good and fair point Richard. Except that the Co$ has a very bad history despite it being so short. Between doing their best to ruin the lives of people who leave or those who speak out against them, in some cases driving them to suicide, to their withholding of important medications that has caused the deaths of some of their members, their all out rejection of established and respected mental health practices and their shadowy, myserious and guarded nature, it’s not easy to sympathise with them.

      Everyone’s entitled to their own beliefs, certainly. But they are certainly not entitled to stalk people who oppose their beliefs, place people under surveillence and worse. The Co$ have done all these things.

    • Louisa says:

      04:07pm | 08/07/12

      I suggest you do some reading on Scientology and inform yourself on exactly what damage that ‘religion’ does to its adherents and their families. Study up on the ‘fairgame’ policy they have too - it basically says that they can do anything (and I mean, anything) to people who are vocal in their criticism of Scientology.

    • Rose says:

      05:05pm | 08/07/12

      There is a massive difference between having your children attend Sunday School or religious school and having them indoctrinated in the way that Scientologists are according to those who have been through it and got out of the cult in adulthood. I will happily defend everyone’s right to instruct their children in whatever religion they choose, but I will never support people having their children brainwashed by cults such as Scientology.
      As for Tom Cruise, I doubt whether any sane person would describe him as a strong role model. At best he comes across as being a loose cannon, at worst a domineering, spoilt brat who is too blinkered to be able to rationalize or understand other points of view. His tirade against Brooke Shields demonstrated not only a distinct lack of compassion and empathy, but also showed him to be ignorant and destructive.
      Yeah it’s sad that a family has broken down, but I don’t think Tom is the one who deserves sympathy. I think most sympathy should go to Suri and some for Katie, although Katie showed distinct naivety and also that she is easily swayed by the trappings of wealth and big gestures when she got mixed up with a man with Cruise’s track record.

    • Mack says:

      05:16pm | 08/07/12

      The only reason they call it a ‘religion’is to dodge tax.

    • PhilD says:

      06:04pm | 08/07/12

      @Greg - Meanwhile you would teach children your inventions, your nonsense and other things you have no idea about?

    • Jay says:

      07:46pm | 08/07/12

      @Richard, you aren’t a scientologist are you?
      Your last paragraph…that’s all.
      One person’s assertive, dominant man…role model is another person’s domineering control freak.  I think this is his third family and one engagement that’s ‘broke down’, all three had in common was Tom Cruise.

    • Nathan Explosion says:

      08:23pm | 08/07/12

      You should read up on Scientology. It’s not a religion, it’s a dangerous cult. I can’t understand why they are still granted tax free status in Australia.

    • M. says:

      08:25am | 09/07/12

      All religion is child abuse.

    • Bee says:

      01:00pm | 09/07/12

      Richard, you have a very proscribed view of what a “good man’ should be. It’s a bit stereotyping isn’t it? A bit sexist?

    • Richard: says:

      03:39pm | 09/07/12

      Yes, Bee, I do have a very proscribed view of what a good man is. I suppose that is a bit sexist. Funnily enough, I think sexism is a GOOD thing… And it seems the research backs me up:

      “Research indicates that the endorsement of sexist ideology is linked to higher subjective wellbeing for both men and women. We examine gender differences in the rationalisations which drive this effect in an egalitarian nation (New Zealand). Results from a nationally representative sample (N?=?6,100) indicated that the endorsement of Benevolent Sexism (BS) predicted life satisfaction through different mechanisms for men and women. For men, BS was directly associated with life satisfaction. For women, the palliative effect of BS was indirect and occurred because BS-ideology positioning women as deserving of men’s adoration and protection was linked to general perceptions of gender relations as fair and equitable, which in turn predicted greater levels of life satisfaction.”

      http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-011-0017-2?state=cookieless

    • marley says:

      08:52pm | 09/07/12

      @Richard - I think the term BS is entirely appropriate for that article.

    • Sunny says:

      12:23pm | 08/07/12

      Tom Cruise is a deluded Scientologist who wants to become President…So what?

      He is no better or worse than anyone else with a religious agenda/affiliation who wants to assume office and should be judged as such.

    • sunny says:

      04:36pm | 08/07/12

      Sunny - problem is he’s a bit of a dingbat. I’m genuinely surprised he’s a Democrat, I thought Dems were usually a lot more down to earth smile I think people would be as uncomfortable with him gaining power as they would with Sarah Palin gaining power.

    • Justme says:

      12:24pm | 08/07/12

      Mr Cruise is creepy with or without the Cult. That is all.

    • Hawko says:

      12:54pm | 08/07/12

      What a tosser !!!!!!

    • Keith Hammersmith says:

      12:59pm | 08/07/12

      “I won’t bother you with how Scientologists believe their life mission is to get “clear” from the Thetans that invade the spirits of Earthlings after they crash-landed on a planet during some sort of intergalactic carnage involving the warlord Xenu, some 75 millions years ago.”

      granted that sounds pretty kooky, but no more kooky than say..  the bible.
      seriously. In my opinion all organized religion is kooky, once you get to a certain number of ‘subscribers’ it stops being kooky i guess and starts being the norm.

    • John L says:

      11:34am | 09/07/12

      @Keith: From what I read they didn’t crash-land, they were brought here on DC-10 looking space ships so that Xenu could pile them up around volcanoes and blow up the volcanoes using “hydrogen bombs”. The Bible doesn’t come anywhere near the drooling, raving madman that was Lafayette Hubbard.

    • Jay says:

      01:55pm | 08/07/12

      I doubt Tom would be seriously taken as Presidency candidate. You only have to read internet forums about the impending divorce (which, Okay, I’ve outed myself as a shallow gossip of stars, I’m embarassed to admit!), to see the overwhelmingly commentary is how creepy people seem to find Tom Cruise.  I’m still amazed, as I’ve previously written, how such a lousy limited range actor still is a box office draw, even in his Mission Impossible franchise (which I’ve not watched & never will). I think A Few Good Men was the last Cruise movie I watched and all I noted in that was how ‘hard’ Tom Cruise was trying to be authentic in it. When one starts noting an actor trying his darndest, it hits home what an inadequate job they’re really doing. 

      @CD Yes, three marriages and one broken engagement and counting. I’ll bet you anything his next ‘wife’ will be mid twenties to early thirties, there’s no way 50 yr old Tommy is going to marry somebody close to his own age.
      Scientology apparently brings Tom joy and peace, but apparently, just not with his former three wives.
      Funny, Tony Robbins, happiness advisor to the stars, saviour of relationships, is also on marriage number three and still calls himself a ” self help coach”.

    • Lorraine says:

      04:58pm | 08/07/12

      Ronald Reagan managed it from virtually thesame background… Hollywood

    • Jay says:

      10:06am | 09/07/12

      @Lorraine. Partly agree, but Ronnie Regan hasn’t got the larger public perception of being weird and belonging to an even weirder religion.
      Given that Tom is an actor by trade (well, if you can call him that…) one would think he would be able to put on a good front of being normal for the general masses, but he can’t even do that successfully.  Tom has weirded himself out of American Politics and given that landscape, that’s really something!

    • Meph says:

      12:08pm | 09/07/12

      @Lorraine

      Reagan was a fairly decent guy right up till the Alzheimers started to kick in.  The question with Cruise for president is who is pulling the strings.

    • Blossom says:

      02:36pm | 08/07/12

      He reminds me of a Dictator , i saw a brief footage of him standing on the podium, ranting, arm raised almost at eye level, i almost expected the audience to yell Hail Tom!

      I think he is an ego driven self opinionated nutter.
      Good on you Katie , for getting the hell out of there.

    • Lorraine says:

      03:49pm | 08/07/12

      Save the American Presidency by putting a height clause into the deal.
      No presidents under five feet five, thnk you.
      it takes a big man to do a big job.

    • Fred says:

      07:43pm | 08/07/12

      Interesting point Lorraine, Carter, Reagan, GHW Bush, Clinton, GW Bush and Obama are all tall, maybe it’s difficult to get elected if you have a cruisesque stature?

    • CumberBitch Eloise says:

      04:07pm | 08/07/12

      I sort of feel sorry for Tom. I wonder if he would come across as weird and deluded if not for his first wife, Mimi, who introduced him to Scientology. Was he the ‘Katie’ in that relationship? From what I’ve seen and read, he has been completely brainwashed by the Scientology puppet-masters for their own gain and agenda. I am NOT excusing nor am I justifying his behaviour, but I wonder if he was, back then when there was nobody to “save Tom”, pulled so far in that he doesn’t realise how controlled by the organisation he now is. Remember, back then he was probably just as young, naive, on the cusp of fame and desperate to be accepted by Tinsletown as Katie Holmes at that point of their lives. I suspect Scieotology offered him, via his then wife, respite from the madness of Hollywood. That’s what a cult does. Am not defending it or Tom. Just saying things may have been different if someone had been there to support him.

    • Rose says:

      10:02pm | 08/07/12

      I think Scientology, as with all cults, gets people at their most vulnerable. That’s why those people are not strong enough to logically think through what is being presented to them. Unfortunately it seems that once you get in it’s hard to get out again. Most churches are more than welcoming to new members, but if they stop going, they’re not hounded or blackmailed to stay, which is what ex-members of Scientology have claimed happened to them
      I have no doubt that Cruise, for whatever reason was either very vulnerable when he became involved or he was so smitten with his then wife he got himself sucked in that way. Either way, you would think that with his resources and what’s been written about Scientology he would have had a re-assessment of his involvement by now, even more so considering the impact it has had on his relationships.

    • CumberBitch Eloise says:

      08:26am | 09/07/12

      @ Rose I agree with most of what you say. However with Cults, it’s very difficult to re-assess said cult end one’s personal involvement because you’re so brainwashed. You can be presented with pages and pages of reports, ex members testimony, etc, but the cult will have you believe that it’s persecution of the cult. A brainwashed member, without external deprogramming, believes that relationships that break down and fail are nothing to do with the cult but everything to do with the person or family members who have refused to join or stay in the cult with you. It’s almost impossible to have objectivity regarding the cult. That’s why some families hire professional “cult deprogrammers” to remove a family member from said cult. It’s terrifying and so tragically sad to watch these people go through deprogramming,  I had a friend involved with the Extremist Mormon FLDS, which is classified as a religion, whose kids were removed from the compound in 2008. Her extended family hired a deprogrammer and it took months before she would speak to family who were not FLDS members - she had been brainwashed to believe they were evil. When her daughter got glandular fever, she believed that God was punishing her for leaving the FLDS and tried to return. Basically, cult members cannot understand the damage done to relationships, or they believe the breakdown of the relationship is for the best. The leaders of the cult tell you so and have you completely brainwashed to believe them. To think otherwise means disloyalty to the cult.

    • Rachel says:

      05:10pm | 08/07/12

      Watching interviews with Tom gives the impression that he is incredibly unintelligent, easily swayed and desperate for approval.

      I have no time for him or his movies.

    • St. Michael says:

      11:29pm | 08/07/12

      Read his bio.  First up he was saddled with the name “Thomas Cruise Mapother IV”.  Not sure what kind of sadistic bastard names his son after himself.  Why can’t you can’t let your kid have his own identity, rather than that of his last three ancestors?

      Doesn’t help that his father was abusive.  Per Wikipedia, from Mr Cruise himself: “He was the kind of person where, if something goes wrong, they kick you. It was a great lesson in my life—how he’d lull you in, make you feel safe and then, bang! For me, it was like, ‘There’s something wrong with this guy. Don’t trust him. Be careful around him.”

      Grew up in near poverty conditions.  Parents’ marriage broke up when he was 12.  He went to 15 schools in 12 years and was bullied at each (probably as a result of having a stupid name to deal with and being, shall we say, vertically challenged.  Kids are cruel)

      Where this deviates from the standard is that he discovered acting, and had early success in it.  It’s completely understandable you’d latch onto something you’re good at to define yourself.  I’d suspect acting is Cruise’s way of coping, just as drugs or alcohol is often broken people’s ways of coping.  He can be another person, a successful person, for periods of time; indeed the whole Cruise we see in interviews itself looks like a persona, not a lot different from who we see in his films.

      What we’re looking at is a terribly broken man who has never really been able to resolve the issues of his upbringing or his issues with his father.  The fact he’s failed at three marriages is a powerful indicator he has never been taught how to relate properly to women, or that he is repeating his own parents’ life.

      Just because he has a pretty face and a lot of money does not change that.  He’s to be pitied, because at 50 he’s too old to change, in a position where everyone will push against him changing; if he figures these things out, five bucks he’ll figure them out too late.  Cruise is a tragedy, not a comedy.

    • stephen says:

      06:42pm | 08/07/12

      He is a good wheelchair actor.

    • Du says:

      07:12pm | 08/07/12

      You don’t have to be bright to become a god actor

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      09:33pm | 08/07/12

      Hi Paul,

      It is all very interesting but is this pick on Tom Cruise week or month or something else all together? Tom Cruise might have said and done very controversial things doing his very bright Hollywood career!  I was personally very impressed about what he said about the over prescription of anti depressants in our society!  And you most certainly could not call him unattractive and shallow at all, right?

      And does Hollywood actually not teach us to believe in the very unusual, extra ordinary and strange things, anyway?  If Arnold Schwarzenegger can do it as a governor why not Tom Cruise as a president?  Even though “Mr Cruise was a bit lost and now found thanks to the Church of Scientology”!  I am only guessing that the female portion of our population might actually have a good reason to like him!  Pure talent and charm could be all that world of politics might need right now.

      I am certain this could be more about a certain kind of envy about his good looks and loads of money that he has made during his successful Hollywood career!  And in world politics being well known in some sort of business and having more money than anyone can imagine actually helps anyone, right?  And ultimately for anyone who might be interested in having more fame as well as money than we can all dream of, right?  So what is the actual harm in all this Hollywood drama with lots action theme, unfolding before our very eyes?  After all we have all learnt very valuable lessons about life from Hollywood as well as being entertained.  Without all that life can be very dull and boring!  Kind regards to your editors.

    • Justme says:

      07:40am | 09/07/12

      I’m part of the female population and I am not alone in thinking that the midget, narcissistic control freak with the central tooth (once seen it cannot be unseen) is totally UNlikeable. Pure talent and charm? Not that I’ve ever seen.

      Won’t see a movie if hr’s in it. No way I’d vote for him and I hope the females in USA feel the same.

    • Luke says:

      09:52pm | 08/07/12

      Its funny how writers like this think repeatingly calling scientology a “cult” will make it true…

    • Bertrand says:

      09:00am | 09/07/12

      A quick check on Google defines the word cult as such: “A relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister.”

      Sounds like Scientology fits this definition perfectly.

    • OchreBunyip says:

      09:46am | 09/07/12

      So, the only real issue with Scientology is it isn’t as large as any of the major religions; they too have sinister practices they just have the advantage of size.

    • Bertrand says:

      10:32am | 09/07/12

      Well on a previous thread about scientology I made the point that the only difference between a cult and a religion is its size and how long it has existed.

      Nonetheless, not all religions are created equal. The belief system of the Scientologists acts in such a way to cause serious psychological and social harm to people who get caught up in its web.

      They use blackmail and extortion against people who try to leave, they threaten those who criticise them. They utilise brainwashing techniques. People who get caught up in scientology must submit their entire sense of self to this organisation. It is dangerous and destructive in a way going to mass on Sunday isn’t.

      I was raised a Catholic. When I left the church I wasn’t threatened, blackmailed or extorted.

    • Luke says:

      10:07am | 10/07/12

      The trouble bertrand, is that we have a society that “gets off” over hating religion. The new “religion” is “anti-religion” and thier lies, and the idioicy of this belief systems has no limits. Calling Scientology a cult seems to help them, so they just repeat it over and over… try going to thier church sometime, and doing a course, you might get a different view. You need not convert (many people don’t), just see what they ACTUALLY DO.
      The reality is no religion or coorporate entity for that matter has a “web of evil” like you are describing. All of that is rumour which is a price one pays for being successful. The catholic church pays it as does Google as does McDonalds.
      All religions get treated this same way, its very simular to the way communism has treated any entity that makes any money.
      I mean, mankind has desparately tried to find the answer to questions brought up in relligion for thousands of years and all i see in your comments is a belief that you know better than they do. Kinda sad…
      Do some REAL research; Google is based on number of hits, not reality… some day society will wake up to that!

    • Nikki says:

      11:47pm | 08/07/12

      Gross. Tom Cruise is disgusting. He had a shortlist of potential wives, his agents put the word out and a couple of girls took the bait. From the short list: Jennifer Garner, Jessica Alba, Scarlett Johannson and Katie Holmes. The ones that took the bait: Scarlett, went to the Scientology Centre and was scared by what she saw and backed right out, Katie Holmes’ career was pretty much nowhere so she dove in. She knew what she was getting into, would have signed an iron clad contract when she got involved. Hmm as much as I want to say Run Katie Run, she got what she asked for.

    • M says:

      08:35am | 09/07/12

      How is scientology any less outlandish or weird than the cannibal cult of the zombie jew?

    • barry from adelaide says:

      08:54am | 09/07/12

      Good news, Suri will now be indoctrinated in Catholicism rather than Scientology.

    • harijake says:

      10:17am | 09/07/12

      @ Barry from Adelaide….exactly! Can vividly recall my ex’s mother got agitated and threaten four of her nine grandkids because they wanted to play outside rather than sit through another bible story dvd cartoon. It was Darwin, two days prior to Christmas, stinking hot and humid. These poor kids, all aged six and under, wanted to be running about outside, instead they were forced to sit in full attention and awe of the bible animation. Their grandmother was in the same room ironing shirts, and when two of the youngest kids began to fidget, she waved the hot iron at them and barked “pay attention and sit still!” Even the pet dog was shocked. These were kids under the age of five. This woman behaved like a nut. She also dragged them to both the local cinema and bookshops to protest the Harry Potter series. She used to throw holy water at kids whose parents took them to see the movies or buy the books. It was assault but in her screwed interpretation of religion, the only laws which mattered were the laws/cannon of the Catholic church. Those kids now have all sorts of issues ranging from pregnancy at 14, to self cutting and mutilation, to being expelled from schools for violence, to being sent to juvenile correctional facilities, to attempted suicide. Not one of these kids have remained within the Catholic faith and refuse to have anything to do with their grandmother. The youngest boy graffitied the inside of the church and when asked why, he stated to “stop others from being brainwashed”.

    • VJR says:

      09:14am | 09/07/12

      Well Scientology is a very weird cult but the way the catholic church has conducted itself with priest that molest chidden in their care then changing churches would be like jumping from the frying pan into the fire.

    • OchreBunyip says:

      09:51am | 09/07/12

      Consider the past evil of the Catholic Church, they have emerged strong, larger, more wealthy through their crimes and now are actually accorded respect by many people. Of course they “deeply regret” the excesses of the past (and gloss over the evil of the present) and for some reason no-one calls bullshit. I see Scientology is still in the werid/cult stage but in a few centuries could be as respectable as the Catholic Church, larger, more wealthy and they will, no doubt, “deeply regret” the excesses of the past..

    • Susan says:

      01:16pm | 09/07/12

      I’d just love to be sent flowers.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter