This week’s Angry Cripple column is brought to you by the letter S. Simon McKeon is the 2011 Australian of the Year, part-time executive chairman of Macquarie Group, philanthropist, volunteer, father of four, internationally acclaimed competitive sailor, and has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.

Man with a view. Well, a vision. Photo: Bill McAuley

The time has come for a National Disability Insurance Scheme.

The time has come for major reform in the way services to Australians with disabilities are funded and delivered; not only to enhance the basic human rights of people with disabilities but to greatly enhance the level of participation in the economy by people with disabilities, their families and carers. 

Sadly, for many thousands of Australians with a disability, their families and carers, the NDIS – no matter how promising – will come too late. They have already endured more than their fair share of difficulty. 

But for hundreds of thousands of vulnerable Australians, the NDIS represents a flicker of hope that they in their lifetimes, and they will finally get the support they need to live the relatively normal lives most Australians take for granted. 

So with the recent release of the Productivity Commission’s draft report recommending the establishment of the NDIS, we are entering a phase in Australia where some big decisions and policy for the future will be shaped for people with a disability and their families in Australia

It is absolutely imperative that these decisions are made – one way or the other – rather than subjecting people with disabilities to another round of enquiry, consultation and review – or death by a thousand (paper) cuts.

Let’s not mince words – there is a national crisis confronting disability in Australia. It is nothing new – sadly, crisis is a permanent setting.

But this time the crisis has had a very powerful spotlight shone on it by the Productivity Commission, which up-front diagnosed the system as: “inequitable, underfunded, fragmented and inefficient and gives people with a disability little choice.”

This observation is of no surprise to people with disabilities, their families and carers, who have been trying to tell the nation of this situation for decades.

However, such a sombre assessment from the Productivity Commission must be a wakeup call to most who would naturally assume that in Australia - as a modern, prosperous, nation – some of our most vulnerable citizens, i.e. people with disabilities, get the support and care they need. 

It is obvious that there must be root and branch reform to the way disability services are funded and delivered across Australia, and the NDIS is at the heart of this reform as its vehicle. 

Over recent years, there have been persuasive arguments made from many quarters for comprehensive reform but for whatever reason, those calls have gone largely unheeded. Mainly, in my view, because disability has never been considered a mainstream political issue.

But now in 2011 after years of fighting, pleading, knocking on doors and telling stories, a convergence of factors means that the sector may actually be on the cusp of something significant.

Before I addressed the recent National Disability and Carers Congress in Melbourne, the organisers had asked me to choreograph a modest stunt for the benefit of the Every Australian Counts campaign – the simple act of conference attendees holding up a placard which read ‘I Count’.

It was a dignified, stoic silence – nothing of the din and bells and whistles that characterise political events. The overwhelming sense in the room was one of resignation – people know that if the NDIS doesn’t materialise in the near future it may pass by and it won’t be revisited any time soon.

Most present are well versed in the many economic, social and humanitarian arguments for reform, having practised them on politicians and policy makers over the years. They were heartened by the earlier reminder from Bill Shorten that the door remains ajar for reform.

The NDIS has the potential to deliver massive benefits – not only to individuals with a disability but to the nation - and represents a neat fusion of economic and social policy; a landmark, legacy-making reform on the scale of Medicare, enshrining the Treasurer’s call that ‘we don’t have an Australian to waste’. 

Most commented

37 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • deb says:

      07:50am | 01/06/11

      Good Luck~NDIS?
      I am having one of those good spells ,superwoman,thinking i can work fulltime and dont need all this bloody medication.Next week my body will let me down and the depression will start again.Cycle after cycle.Epilepsy,so misunderstood even by me.
      So unfair and cruel to take my memory and turn me into the dunce,the dope.
      Funny thing is its like a brick wall there in my head,holding back my thoughts and i try in vain to break thru.
      I read everything i can get my hands on and once had my IQ tested and wasnt surprised to find it quite high.
      Nowadays though i am treated as an idiot.
      So to all those out there,Disability is not going to go away! We need all the help and support the Gov. should give us.
      Help me!I know i could be working more than part time as a cleaner. Train me,  teach me ,be patient with me.

    • TChong says:

      08:40am | 01/06/11

      deb
      You sound to have a great deal of trouble managing the seizures, yes?
      Might be a good idea to get a 2nd ( or 3rd ) opinion.
      Until the cause is established for the frequency , and intensity of the episodes, then you will be continually hitting the same brick wall.

    • caro says:

      10:06am | 03/06/11

      TChong - You know how you reckon the unions are so “supportive” of people with disabilities and their driven-insane families/carers? In which case, did you see recent revelations TC that GetUp is funded by massive union donations? And do you know GetUp has point blank refused, over & over & over again, to adopt campaign for NDIS, despite it being one of most requested campaigns on GetUp website?
      Now TC, go to dictionary and look up definition of the word “hypocrisy”.

    • Blessing Counter says:

      08:36am | 01/06/11

      Anyone with a serious disability should be helped far more financially and the able bodied must count their blessings and not their money.

    • jf says:

      09:13am | 01/06/11

      I agree that a scheme should be set up to help some people with disabilities.

      However, a scheme that was established to help those that should have helped themselves such as Simon McKeon would be so cost prohibitive as to not be viable or alternatively necessarily underfund the genuinely needy in order to help everyone.

      People like Simon, me and most other people should take the responsibility for funding their own insurance so that the funds available for a scheme such as this is able to fund those born with disabilities or who suffer disabilities as children and have not been able to arrange and fund their own cover.

    • Tinman says:

      11:37am | 01/06/11

      jf I absolutely agree with you.  If there is a NDIS it should only be available to those who have not had the appropriate chance to insure themselves, i.e those born with a disability or are disabled before the age of 18.

      All others should have appropriate cover in place.  As a young person with little to no debt I do not have much life cover but I have plenty of TPD (Total and Permanent Disability Insurance) as well as Income Protection cover which will pay 75% of my income until I am 65 or return to work if injured or disabled.  All of this within my superannuation fund.

    • fairsfair says:

      12:42pm | 01/06/11

      I agree too.

      I have income protection and life cover. But I look at my dad who had that cover and then when something happened they said “sorry. we won’t pay your full entitlement”.

      It should also be dependent on family situation. My father has had a stroke and he has a wife and three kids. I’m sorry, but it should be our primary responsibility to ensure our father is looked after, which we currently do. My father is on the partial DSP because my mum chooses to continue to work. We all have to make a contribution and all that.

      I dont’ think it is fair, but I don’t think it fair my dad had a stroke either and it certainly shouldn’t be up to the tax payer of Australia to foot bills that we as a family, with mutual sacrifice and effort - can make. And those bills are high and the time involved it is demanding.

      Yes, we all pay tax, my dad has paid a lot - but I would much prefer tax dollars go toward collective good, not welfare for unlucky people that refused to acknowledge life’s risks when they were in a position to do so. And unlucky - that really is all it is too.

    • jf says:

      01:10pm | 01/06/11

      “But I look at my dad who had that cover and then when something happened they said “sorry. we won’t pay your full entitlement”.”

      Tough break fairsfair. Good attitude though.

      There’s usually no point in blaming the insurance company as they will simply pay the benefit that they agreed to for the premium charged. However, if the policy is deficient and not what your father thought he had, the person who established may have some answering to do.

    • fairsfair says:

      01:41pm | 01/06/11

      jf, it had an exclusion for “pre-existing” conditions. Dad’s stroke was attributed to “Factor IV Leiden” which is something that is quite common in Irish and fair Western Europeans and causes their blood to clot outside of the norm. You can have two of the same gene pairing (homozeigous) and one of each (heterozeigous). Dad is homo and I am hetero. So even though I am not as big a risk, his (and my) genetic conditions are deemed to be “pre-existing”. So he got about $10k from the million odd he was insured for. It was there written in black and white and the payment was made ex gratia and actually ended up being roughly what dad had paid to them over the years. There are some good people in this world.

      My dad doesn’t always share this view, he has his bad days - but he has kept his sense of humour and we manage. Sadly, they are just the cards we have been dealt. I am paying for insurance knowing full well if I have a stroke it will not pay out - but I can’t live worrying about that and excluding all other risks.

      This genetic awareness is what worries me the most. How far are things likely to go? There is no way known that you can be aware of genetic conditions you hold, but like it or not they are sitting in there, waiting to go boom.

      If you are of western/northern european decent you should google it and have the blood test. An asprin a day may just save your life/quality of life (like I hope it does mine).

    • jf says:

      02:47pm | 01/06/11

      fairsfair says:01:41pm | 01/06/11

      Thanks fairsfair. I’ll do that.

    • Eye4anEye says:

      05:50pm | 01/06/11

      I was going to write something similar and was extremely happy to find other people with a similar view on the situation.

      /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\  +1 What the people above said.

    • Frank says:

      01:01pm | 01/06/11

      WOW He has MS and can still play around with a mistress! OMG why is this called a disability when a married man can still get into the panties of another women?

    • Pete says:

      01:38pm | 01/06/11

      Ordinary Australians get lost at welfare-speak. ‘Comprehensive reform’ ‘System in Crisis’ are meaningless public-servant speak words. The author provided not one example for people to latch onto: I’m sure he has them, but unless he’s addressing the disability industry, he should use them to illustrate the point.
      An ‘NDIS’ (whatever it is or means) must be directed at those without the means to provide for themselves. Sorry, but people with choices (ie. incomes) can elect to insure themselves, or endure only a basic system if fate befalls them. We already have a default system: superannuation. Why not extend that?
      ps fairsfair: great attitude

    • Carrie says:

      01:57pm | 01/06/11

      @fairsfair, if it isn’t the role of government to ensure the people in our society have access to basic human rights, then what IS the role of our government?

      Australia is a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and as such has a duty to ensure that their rights are upheld. This includes the right to full social and economic inclusion without discrimination. Life insurance and disability protection are luxuries for those that can afford the premiums, not everyone can afford them.

      An NDIS will provide universal protection for everyone at a small cost for everyone equally, similar to how Medicare is now funded. An NDIS isn’t about welfare either, it’s totally separate from the disability support pension, an NDIS is about access to services in a system that values choice and dignity for people with disabilities so that they might be able to realise full social and economic inclusion.

    • tinman says:

      02:24pm | 01/06/11

      Carrie, So the disability support pension does not meet the UN Convention than?  This pension is equal to the age pension so are age pensioners not able to realise full social and economic inclusion?

      We already have in place a bottom net for disabled and elderly, I agree that it is not alot of money but there is a bottom net.  We also adhere to the charter by providing disabled people rights, but we also have a rider in that charter (as I have discovered from googling it) that we do not consider itself bound to stop forcibly medicating those labeled mentally ill.

      The concept of the charter is about dignity for people with disabilities not money, although many will argue that money brings dignity.  I think we already meet that charter without the need for a NDIS.

      Comparing this to Medicare is interesting considering many disabled people without adequate insurance cover would already be using Medicare facilities to access health benefits to help them medically with their disability, as they should be able to.

      At the end of the day I can see merit in a scheme like this but and it is a big but it is the taxpayers money that is used and I think alot of taxpayers have had enough of seeing their taxes wasted.

      The essential role of a government is to effectively and efficiently provide services that the private sector cannot provide for the good of the community.  By this I mean police, defense, schooling, basic welfare etc (although many of these essential services are now being done by the private sector).  The government should also assist the prosperity of a nation by keeping taxes to a minimum to encourage growth.

    • fairsfair says:

      02:28pm | 01/06/11

      Please re-read my comment in the context of jfs orginal post. My life/TPD insurance is within my super as is Tinman’s, as was my dad’s. That is not out of reach for employed persons making a super contribution as it is taken from your super payment - there is no out of pocket expense for me. I am talking about people who are capable of privately collecting the resources and support to regain their previous life following illness/injury. Be that through their own personal funds, or their family’s. Yes they are a burden, but they should be a burden to the family, not the community. As I said - it is not fair, but life generally is not and I can tell you right now I will spend my last cent, sell my own house to keep my father fed, clothed and his own roof over his head. If you were faced with the same cicumstance I am sure you would do the same. I am not talking about the people who do not have family, have never worked or were born with a disability.

      Those who work should fund their own future - those who do not, yep govt please step in as you currently do.

    • Do the maths before you think you can solve it all says:

      03:25pm | 01/06/11

      You guys crack me up. You really think your $2M TPD coverage will look after you? Bwahahahahahaha…
      It costs up to $200K per annum for supported care, and that doesn’t include medication, shampoo, a modified vehicle and driver, accessible taxis, specialists, occupational and speech therapy or physio.
      You guys are dreaming. Unless of course, you have your near fatal injury or illness at the age of 55, already own your home, have a spouse and kids to help you out.
      God forbid you judgemental, arrogant, naive idiots get caught in a rip at the beach, or suffer a debilitating permanent illness at 25, or 30.

    • tinman says:

      03:49pm | 01/06/11

      I agree with you that the TPD cover might not cover everything, what I disagree with is using tax payer funds to provide free insurance.  I disagree with using tax payer funds for alot of things except for the essentials.

      These costs of the supportive care etc would likely come under medicare and or private health insurance but I am happy to admit I am wrong there.  I just cannot imagine someone who has an injury or illness being sent a bill for $200k for their government supported assistance.  Some of the things mentioned would obviously not be covered but thats what the insurance is for.

      This is the issue with this for me it seems as though we are doubling up here.  If we have spare funds to create an add on to free healthcare, disability support pension, workers compensation and private insurance then why not use those funds to boost free healthcare and the disability support pension.  It is the waste and doubling up that I am against, not helping people with severe disabilities who have no other avenues.

    • fairsfair says:

      03:52pm | 01/06/11

      you lost me at judgemental, arrogant, naive idiots.

    • jf says:

      04:27pm | 01/06/11

      “God forbid you judgemental, arrogant, naive idiots”

      I’m sure that you don’t get the irony of this sentence.

      And no, I don’t think that $2m would cover profound disabilities. That said, a good mate of mine is paralysed from the neck down. His care costs at least that. He had over $3m in cover plus $15k pm in income protection which pays until he is well into his 60s and is self-funded: as he ought to be. He is wealthy and had a good income, I don’t think for a moment that your average tax payer on $50k pa should have to fund a guy that was on a high salary, lives in a $5m home and has plenty of investable assets.

      Whilst you are obviously an obnoxious, self-righteous turd, you do have a point. That is why, in establishing a scheme like this, all voices must be heard. Of one thing I am certain, if people aren’t encouraged to protect themselves to a certain extent then a scheme like this would be cost prohibitive and would never get off the ground.

    • CC says:

      10:17am | 03/06/11

      “These costs of the supportive care etc would likely come under Medicare or private health insurance but I am happy to admit I am wrong here” - sorry Tinman, but the time to admit you are wrong has arrived mate. They don’t come under anything, which is why ageing carers/family members get to provide all the supportive care, three shifts a day, seven days a week, for $50 a week from the Govt. Pray you are never in this situation Tinman.

    • Carrie says:

      04:45pm | 01/06/11

      @fairsfair and @tinman It would be great if you would go and read the information from the source, this is a very quick read that should only take 1 minute of your life: http://everyaustraliancounts.com.au/about/ten_reasons_why_we_need_an_ndis/

      The NDIS is NOT about the disability pension! It’s about the disability support system which is currently fragmented and broken, leaving thousands of people with disabilities and their carers in dire circumstances. A psychologist reported to the Productivity Commission for its report that there were a number of incidences of carers with feelings of murder/suicide. This is not a group of people that are reaping the rewards of social inclusion.

      @tinman, interesting that you mentioned the age pension because the aged and those with disabilities are more likely to live in poverty than any other group of people in Australia. Also, yes the NDIS would be paid for (in part) by taxpayers, and ALL taxpayers will have access to it with their dignity intact should the need arise.

    • fairsfair says:

      05:15pm | 01/06/11

      Sorry Carrie I am a bit confused because jf said this:

      “I agree that a scheme should be set up to help some people with disabilities”.

      I subsequently agreed. I get that NDIS is different, but using private monies for non-subsidised treatment currently happens and if that can be done, aside from the existing medicare rebates and assistance, I am happy for that to continue for people like my family - who can afford to do this themselves and into the future.

      For those who cannot afford to do so (the care and ongoing medical requirement), yes the system sounds the way to go. I just re-read my second post - apologies, I did not mean to include the currently bit. I just am fully in agreement with jf that this should be available so “some” people.

    • Sam P says:

      05:12pm | 01/06/11

      Hi Tinman. Medicare and health insurance do not cover supported accommodation at all.
      What currently happens to people in supported accommodation (those who can get it) is that the Govt (or agency or for-profit in the case of a SRFs aka boarding houses) keeps 85% of their DSP.
      I think one point that might be being missed here is (and correct me if I’m wrong) that most disability dollars are used/needed by people with intellectual disabilities - people who don’t have jobs with super and could never afford insurance anyway. It us these people who are the hardest done by, particularly when their parent advocates die and the rest of the family shuns any responsibility. I’ve seen it so many times and it never fails to upset me. I have become friends with and advocate for a man my age with an intellectual disability, and I hate to admit that I partially do it to put my money where my mouth is, thinking that when I die, hopefully, someone will take that role for my son who has an intellectual disability and will need someone to watch out for him for the rest of his life.

    • Fiona Anderson says:

      05:55pm | 01/06/11

      The NDIS is intended to provide insurance cover to cost the costs of severe disability for anyone who needs it, just like every Australian is covered for reasonable medical needs via Medicare. The Productivity Commission found that the private insurance market doesn’t offer products which meet all needs, assuming you can afford to pay private insurance.  For example, the life-long support costs of a child born with a severe disability cannot be insured.  Our family has spent $500,000 in our child’s 15 years of life on wheelchairs, equipment, therapy, etc. Because there is no after school ,vacation care or ad-hoc support for a child with a severe disability, it is not possible for most mothers of disabled children to earn income. So the family financial outlays on equipment and therapy far exceed the average family costs - and are not fully tax deductible - yet capacity to earn income (to pay for therapy, equipment) is halved. So many families are forced to sell their home, raid their super, grandparents sell their retirement assets to pay for the supports which invest in the child’s future.  It would be more economically rational to provide minimal funding via the NDIS to support a child with a disability which enables parents to work, pay tax and buy the support, services and equipment which enable the child with a disability to learn and live independently, be educated, get a job and pay tax.  And that is just the economic gains from investment in disability support.  There is also the question of a First World nation excluding a large chunk of the population from ordinary, every day life - due to the financial, environmental, employment and attitudinal barriers which are the true “disability” in our lives.

    • Carrie says:

      06:31pm | 01/06/11

      So well said. Thanks for sharing, Fiona.

    • Lesley Spark says:

      10:20pm | 01/06/11

      Fiona Im so glad to see that someone gets it ! Being the sole parent of a severley disabled teenager I found it so distressing to read most of the previous comments it made me realise that most of the poulation has no idea what life is like when you have a child with a disability . The lack of options the total fear of the future because ther are no choices & the life lived in poverty because ther is no other choice .

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      11:43pm | 01/06/11

      out of sight, out of mind, governments don’t care

    • jf says:

      07:49am | 02/06/11

      Lesley Spark says: 10:20pm | 01/06/11

      I’ve not read one comment that suggests that someone in your position wouldn’t be supported by such a scheme.

      In fact, my thoughts above are directly in relation to someone in your position. The more fit and healthy adults who prepare themselves for the possibility of severe disability, the more is available for people, such as yourselves, who find themselves in this position without having been able to prepare for it.

      Rest assured, should anything happen to me, any needs that I have I will be largely able to fund myself leaving more for your child. Surely this is a good thing for you.

    • caro says:

      05:38pm | 02/06/11

      Well here’s a thought JF. If people who live in bushfire-prone and/or flood-prone areas can’t, don’t or won’t get around to insuring their houses and contents against bushfires or floods - as we see every time there’s a major bushfire or flood - how many people are going to insure themselves against something (ie disability) which the vast majority of Australians smugly assume couldn’t happen to them in a million years? And because only a small minority take out commercial insurance against this risk, that makes the premiums really high, which further discourages people, i.e vicious circle. Or what happens if you are fully insured (clever ol’ you), but it’s your spouse who’s not working who has the stroke, or gets diagnosed with multiple sclerosis or muscular dystrophy or falls off a balcony and breaks their neck or any other of the myriad ways people can find themselves permanently disabled in the blink of an eye?
      And then, as a supposedly civilised, first world, wealthy country, what do we do about all those people? (And there’s literally hundreds of thousands of them).
      Do we provide good quality early intervention and therapy and support to maximise their independence, minimise effects of disabling condition for as long as possible and help them stay working and paying taxes or otherwise being productive members of society? Or do we do what we currently do in Aus and say “tough shit, there’s an 18-month wait to see a therapist and a three-yr wait for a wheelchair”? Seems to me it’s a no-brainer JF. But the problem with this country is that there are too many brainless people walking around, revelling in materialism and hedonism and greed and not giving a stuff about their fellow human beings when there are all those great big tanks of cars to buy in order to show off to the neighbours and TVs the size of walls to buy.

    • jf says:

      06:33pm | 02/06/11

      caro says:05:38pm | 02/06/11

      Firstly, my wife is insured as well.

      So, what you’re saying is essentially that everyone else should pick up the tab for your greed and hubris? You choose where you live, you choose whether or not to get insurance or whether you’d rather save the premiums and buy yourself a better plasma screen and you decide that everyone else, including a lot of people who either have less than you or need the money more than you, should pick up the tab.

      Stop being so naive. This stuff costs money and that money has to come from somewhere. I’ve taken personal responsibility. That costs me money - and you’re calling me greedy and materialistic. You’ve got to be kidding Caro.

      At the end of the day, if I suffer a disability I don’t take money away from someone whose need is greater. If my house burns down, I don’t stick my hand out to others to help me. And you’re calling me greedy and materialistic. You’ve got to be kidding Caro.

      The greedy ones are those that don’t stump up for insurance premiums and stick their hands out expecting everyone else to help out when things go wrong.

      There are people who are genuinely in need, life Fiona Anderson above. I am fully supportive of a comprehensive, fully funded scheme for people in that situation. The more ignorant, greedy, lazy, stupid who don’t take personal responsibility because of greed or hubris the less money their is available for Fiona Anderson’s son.

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      11:42pm | 01/06/11

      I am on the disability pension & trying to get back into work, as soon as people hear that the Commonwealth rehab service is my job network the interview ends or doesn’t even start, oh did I mention that I’m 59? ? I years of relevant experience, references from employers & clients but the job goes to someone with a diploma & NO experience

    • Melissa says:

      10:33am | 02/06/11

      I have a disability. In the grand scheme of things, it’s not entirely severe on its own, I would guess. I was born with a lifelong disability called Spina Bifida, and i’m now 26. I also have Hydrocephalus and a rare type of anaemia called Diamond-Blackfan Anaemia, and require monthly hospital visits. I absolutely support an NDIS, and I wish that the government would be a little kinder to disabled people when it comes to the DSP. I try to do the right thing and find a job. I need a part-time job, close to home (because I can’t drive), where I don’t need to have any qualifications except my admin ones… which btw are GREAT (I type about 70wpm with 98% accuracy). I don’t want people to feel sorry for me. Nor do I -really- want everyone to pay for my needs, and support. I’d like to be able to do that myself. It’s just not going to happen until everyones attitudes change, and people realise we can and do become valuable members of society… with just a little bit of help to start off with. Ie by NOT cutting down the pension, and NOT cutting off the pension card that goes with it after 2 years of employment.

    • Naomi says:

      11:25am | 02/06/11

      There is anouther factor here, it is not only about the money (although that is important).
      I have just spent two hours trying to get forms filled in by a nurse practitioner, after being sent there because the GP was far too busy to “fill in all these forms, they never stop.”  The forms were not completed, but we had to go, as my daughter needed to attend an essential VCE class at school. So now her ability to access funding for equipment to allow her to transfer safely out of the shower is held up, because we can’t get through the paperwork for the orthotist, which is holding up the approval process for the OT.
      This is insanity.  It takes SO many hours.  It would be cheaper for me to go and buy the damn thing and be done with it.  Excepting for the fact I don’t have the money;  and as a sole parent of a child with a disability, that’s a pretty permanent state of affairs.  An NDIS would save all of this paper shuffling, re-documenting (for a permanent condition), and wasting medical practitioners and our time, and just get on with it.  That has to be a good thing for the community - to allow people to get back to school, work and productive activities, instead of clogging up doctor’s waiting rooms when they are not actually sick.

    • Sue O'Reilly says:

      02:57pm | 02/06/11

      Exactly Naomi. What all the commentators above who oppose an NDIS abolutely don’t get and simply don’t realise - doubtless because the vast majority have no personal experience of disability whatsoever - is how grossly wasteful of taxpayers’ money, and how ineffective, and how insanely destructive of people’s lives, health and mental wellbeing the current disability “are and support"system now operating in Australia is.
      We need an NDIS, not just because it’s a compulsory national social insurance scheme - just like Medicare - meaning everyone gets covered at the lowest possible price because the entire community contributes, thereby lowering “premiums” by sharing the cost around, but even more importantly because the current system is a shambolic disgrace, wasting literally billions of dollars of TAXPAYERS’ money every year on rationing, red tape, paperwork and bureaucracy for appallingly poor outcomes and results. If for no other reason, all Australians should support an NDIS solely because they are taxpayers and their taxes are currently being squandered.
      But people just don’t get this until/unless they find themselves stumbling through the Monty Pythoneque, grossly dysfunctional maze we call a “care & support system” in this dopey country, do they?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Bogans_Heroes @1fatbogan Ha! So Adelaide, so creepy. Gilles St, then Unley, then Pembroke.

Paul Colgan

@joekiely just beat the crus. No sweat eh?

Paul Colgan

@bolgo101 Stick ROG in front of the posts and you still have white knuckles

Paul Colgan

@joekiely how far out was he?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter