Many of us learnt at school that the great Nile River sustained Egypt through floods that nourished the fertility of the river’s floodplain.

Root and branch reform is needed. Pic: Supplied

Our Murray and Darling Rivers are no different.

It’s in Australia’s national interest to protect and restore the Murray Darling Basin. Disconnect the river from the floodplain and you destroy the fertility of the land.

The huge stands of dead red gum and black box trees shadowing the lower reaches of the river are symbols of lost fertility.

The river is the lifeblood of the land and our nation.

The outcome we all desire, and the benchmark for a good Plan, has to be a river that is not being poisoned by salt, that flows, and lives.

Anything less threatens the future of the river and regional communities.

A plan falling short fails of these outcomes fails our shared national interest in protecting the nation’s lifeblood.

Alan Carthew is a houseboat operator at Renmark. He told ABC radio the “river is the lifeblood for a lot of people and through here, there’s irrigation, all the tourism and the activities on the river… it’s important to a lot of people.”

Sadly the Basin Authority seems to be developing a plan based on what was possible in the past, not what’s needed by the river and the economy it sustains into the future.

Water Minister Tony Burke should send such a plan back to the Authority and instruct it to prepare a one that will return enough water to give the lower Murray a good chance of returning to health and detail how this can be achieved over the next decade.

The Minister could also set up an independent scientific panel to assess the plan and get them to respond to a simple question: Does the plan give Australia a good chance of a healthy river system or does it not?

Tony Burke should also require the Authority to include options for overcoming real and imagined constraints the Authority claims makes it impossible to give South Australians a healthy Murray River.

Rivers die from the bottom up. South Australian communities will be hardest hit if the government fails to deliver a strong plan.

David Peake is an irrigator at Mannum. He says the lack of flows during the last drought “absolutely devastated [the] town and the community spirit” in Blanchetown below lock 1.

He doesn’t think the 2800 gigalitre figure that’s been shopped around by the Basin Authority is enough to bring back that spirit.

In the next few weeks we’ll hear a lot about the chance to review the Basin Plan in 2015 if the amount of water being returned to the river is enough.

Again, David Peake says “to start low and with the powerful lobby groups that we irrigators have got, there is no way known that the water is ever going to be returned in a greater volume in 2015’‘.

Material the Authority used to brief ACF said the review in 2015 “may mean that the 1700 GL/y proposed for recovery can be reduced significantly perhaps in the order of hundreds of gigalitres”.
It’s time South Australian members of the federal parliament decided if they’re going accept such a plan or fight for the Murray.

History shows it’s in wet years governments decided to hand out more water to irrigation industries and increase the size of dams to hold back bigger and bigger amounts of water the very same water that is needed to keep floodplains alive.

The irony of the recent good rains is Water Minister Tony Burke and his colleagues are now under intense pressure from the irrigation lobby to on one hand weaken the plan, and on the other keep handing out the $10 billion set aside to fix the Murray Darling.

The lobbyists tell us a healthy Murray will threaten food security, even though Australia exports 60 per cent of its agricultural products. And no-one eats cotton.

There are big powerful commercial interests keen to maintain the status quo. The problem is, the status quo will destroy the lower Murray.

Twynams Agricultural Group is one of Australia’s big rice and cotton growers. Its owner recently funded an advertising campaign trying to convince Australians that what they needed was to remove the barrages at the Murray mouth, not seek more flows down the river.

Tony Burke should remember the purpose of the plan isn’t to create a giant ATM for irrigation lobby groups and their backers.

It’s the national interest that needs to be protected.

Most commented

31 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      05:17am | 28/11/11

      We should review the facts about production in our food bowl.  We export 60% of what we produce.  Farmers have quotas imposed on them by the canning companies.  SPC Ardmona, and Heinz are shutting down in Victoria !  Where does that leave the water requirements ? There seems to be a dire need to move work to regional towns to offset the displacement of rural workers from food production ?

    • I hate pies says:

      12:18pm | 28/11/11

      SPC Ardmona isn’t shutting down. They closed the Ardmona plant because of the high AUD. Farmers have always had quotas imposed by the canning companies, regardless of water requirements. If the cost of inputs (ie. water) is too high canning companies can’t compete internationally - bye bye Shepparton. This plan puts the very existance of many towns that rely on the river in jeopardy.

    • Karl says:

      06:47pm | 28/11/11

      Just maybe the demands of those towns have outstripped the supply of the river they originally relied upon?

    • Little Joe says:

      05:31am | 28/11/11

      “The Darling—which is either a muddy gutter or a second Mississippi—is about six times as long as the distance, in a straight line, from its head to its mouth. The state of the river is vaguely but generally understood to depend on some distant and foreign phenomena to which bushmen refer in an off-hand tone of voice as “the Queenslan’ rains”, which seem to be held responsible, in a general way, for most of the out-back trouble.”

      Henry Lawson

      The Darling ..... it is what it is!!!

    • Little Joe says:

      05:36am | 28/11/11

      Song of the Darling River (Henry Lawson 1899)

      The skies are brass and the plains are bare,
      Death and ruin are everywhere —
      And all that is left of the last year’s flood
      Is a sickly stream on the grey-black mud;
      The salt-springs bubble and the quagmires quiver,
      And — this is the dirge of the Darling River:

      ‘I rise in the drought from the Queensland rain,
      ‘I fill my branches again and again;
      ‘I hold my billabongs back in vain,
      ‘For my life and my peoples the South Seas drain;
      ‘And the land grows old and the people never
      ‘Will see the worth of the Darling River.

      ‘I drown dry gullies and lave bare hills,
      ‘I turn drought-ruts into rippling rills —
      ‘I form fair island and glades all green
      ‘Till every bend is a sylvan scene.
      ‘I have watered the barren land ten leagues wide!
      ‘But in vain I have tried, ah! in vain I have tried
      ‘To show the sign of the Great All Giver,
      ‘The Word to a people: O! lock your river.

      ‘I want no blistering barge aground,
      ‘But racing steamers the seasons round;
      ‘I want fair homes on my lonely ways,
      ‘A people’s love and a people’s praise —
      ‘And rosy children to dive and swim —
      ‘And fair girls’ feet in my rippling brim;
      ‘And cool, green forests and gardens ever’ —
      Oh, this is the hymn of the Darling River.


      (The more things change, the more they stay the same)

    • Mahhrat says:

      06:47am | 28/11/11

      I wonder if the first question is, “Do we have enough fresh water to feed the people who live here?”

      The second question is then, “Is there enough left over to run some profitable businesses”?

      I think the OP is right though - if this is another example of big business influencing government policy, then it should be opposed on general principle.

    • I hate pies says:

      12:21pm | 28/11/11

      Bollocks. This is an example of average people trying to protect their livelihoods and the future of their towns.
      This is also an example of environmentalists willing to sacrifice the well being of people to satisfy their ideology.
      All we have to do is shut down the Qld cotton farms - problem solved

    • Karl says:

      06:49pm | 28/11/11

      It’s called a “Jack attitude”.  In other words, as long as I’ve got mine, I don’t give a toss about the rest.

    • Trevor says:

      06:51am | 28/11/11

      Time to replace the cotton farms with hemp maybe? It uses a quarter of the water and has 1000s more industrial uses.

      We could have a thriving rural economy AND a healthy and attractive river.

    • Fiona says:

      08:34am | 28/11/11

      I agree, but can you imagine the hysteria trying to get that approved?

    • Bob Stewart says:

      07:04am | 28/11/11

      It beggars belief that failure to construct storages and diversions of thousands of gl of flood water that flow to sea in northern NSW and Queensland . A set of future projects to waterproof the MDB, no more difficult than construction of the Snowy. Yet,ignored by the MDB Authority to maintain the “balance” of enviro flows by cutting food production What is the so called “balance” ?

      During a drought and no flow, there is no flow for all. The environment included..Where is the vision to produce more food on land already being farmed in the MDB and its water security to do so?

      World population to increase by another 2.8 billion (UN) with 25 million of that number to our North every 3 months (FAO) and Government stuffs around with the $45B NBN. “One of the implications of the NBN is that it will enable a more competitive economy, a more dynamic economy, throughout the whole economy”  (quoting Access Economics)

      Well, if that is one of the “implications”, any others must be just as farcical for nothing will happen without water when needed by the crop to produce food

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      02:20pm | 28/11/11

      +1

      Instead of giving away money to foreign residents and dead people, we’d have been better off stimulating the economy via some massive public work that would have lasting benefits. Pipelines from up north would have been spot on

    • James In Footscray says:

      07:08am | 28/11/11

      Could we have some evidence - as in, how much water is irrigation taking, and what effect is that having? You know, scientific, referenced evidence? Poetic statements about “lifeblood of the land and our nation” and anecdotes about trees don’t cut it.

      I work in education. If I made some assertion we should make some multi-million-dollar decision because “it’s the lifeblood of our organisation” and “I saw some students once who did something” I’d be laughed out of he place.

      Why is environmental action different?


      .

    • mick says:

      07:37am | 28/11/11

      What is happening here is the same as happens elsewhere when business interests are concerned.  It is always about the well being of those who have financial interests.  What is being missed by those who want to leave the present unsustainable system in place is that having half killed the river is bad but complete destruction will come back to haunt the very same communities in the future.  In the end it benefits nobody by destroying that which sustains us all.

      Add to this dilemma another forecast 12 million people which big business wants to add to the nation.  If you think its bad now then what can we expect by 2050 when idiots in business with their self righteous misconceived ideas of (self) wealth have ruined the eco system which we all depend on.

    • rob says:

      07:46am | 28/11/11

      What a scam from you Paul. Show a recent picture where the Gum trees are a picture of health. You use the same scare tactics as the Climate Change lunatics and show those chimneys sprouting clouds of STEAM.

    • Alf says:

      08:07am | 28/11/11

      If anyone can f##k this up, Labor can. I have yet to see them ‘fix’ anything they have touched.

    • On The River says:

      08:15am | 28/11/11

      I understand Mr Sinclair is a spokesperson for the Australian Conservation Foundation who are not the doyens of balance in this debate themselves.

    • Brisbob says:

      09:28am | 28/11/11

      The Government will be damned whether it does or doesn’t or does nothing.We are not alone in the world in facing this problem of prudent allocation of a scarce resource but if we - who are one nation on an island continent - with one law, one language and one Government cannot solve this; what hope is there for the rest of the world? Those nations beset by surrounding countries in a poisonous stew of ambitions/race/religion/ corruption/mistrust and ancient hatreds have even less! “Ladeez & gemmum, choose your partners for the coming water wars dance marathon!” Any number can enter and last couple standing wins the prize!”
      Whether a just consensus is achievable or even possible under our present form of ‘democratic’ government I know not, for the problem is we don’t have statesmen any more only pressure groups and facile politicians whose attention span is the next interview or sitting or election! As Churchill pointed out ‘democracy is the worst possible form of government - were it not for the alternatives’! Also Hubert Humphrey, a much underrated US politician, said ‘the essence of statesmanship is not a rigid adherence to the practices of the past but a prudent and probing concern for the future’!
      Will we get the latter from Gillard or Abbott or Katter - I think not!
      I may be wrong, I certainly hope so, but I think I’ll keep checking the weather radar for any errant flight of Circe’s political pigs!

    • Cameron says:

      11:37am | 28/11/11

      Katter is our only chance to restore it. Hes advocating fiercely to stop coal seam gas, which uses up to 1500 gigalitres of water a year for their industry. Labor and Liberals are allowing it, and the Greens arent doing much, since they cant tax it.
      They focus on promoting Australia to survive, and to again become an exporting nation, which Australia was built on and strongest, and not being competed against slave labor countries who deliberately keep their dollar down and deprive their people.
      Katter is the only one who wants to keep Australia as a sovereign nation.
      Its just appalling this is happening, and the many other idiotics of the government, like using carbon tax money to fund the European Bailout, and sending it off to the UN’s IPCC! So much for it helping Australians!

    • Ray says:

      09:36am | 28/11/11

      The Murray-Darling Basin naturally relies on floods for a good watering. It is wasteful, if not pointless,  to mandate for socalled environmental flows during dry times, when river flow reduces naturally to a trickle. 

      As there is no substantiating scientific evidence to support its case, it is clear that the IPCC has been conning everyone about man-made global warming.  Consequently, there is no justification for the socalled ‘planners’ to mandate water for environmental flows.

    • Wilma J Craig says:

      10:07am | 28/11/11

      hate to be negative but in the end nothing will happen!
      There are far too many vested interests.Far too many selfish, greedy people who want it all their own way& no, I don’t just mean the Irrigators.
      Heaven alone knows how much the Murray Darling Rivers Basin Authority costs us every year. What exactly do all those bureaucrats actually do? Sit around getting ideas, having dreams or, better still, the miraculous ” Vision”. All of which come to nothing. I can’t help thinking they all come from Adelaide where the same thing goes on! Schemes, plabs, dreams & Visions which make people look as if they are actually doing something to address the problems!

    • jack says:

      11:15am | 28/11/11

      I spent my thirty years living on the Murray, and family have been there for generations, sometimes there is the right amount of water, sometimes not enough, and sometimes way too much.

      As far as I can tell, it has always been so, and the ecology of the place has developed accordingly. Witness how quickly an apparently devastated landscape recovers.

      Farmers seem to understand the place in a way that city-based environmentalists don’t

    • DP says:

      11:48am | 28/11/11

      If you’ve spent thirty years on the Murray and haven’t noticed the hundreds of thousands of dead several hundred year old Red Gum then you’ve been wearing blinkers. One minor flood isn’t going to stop the long term decline of the system.  Most people living on the system recognise this but aren’t sure how to deal with it.  Sadly a subset such as yourself deny there is a problem at all.

    • jack says:

      05:15pm | 28/11/11

      there have always been plenty of dead red-gums, well all my life and I am fifty-five, it is part of the cycle of life in the area, and they have been through a tough drought, as they have before and will again.

      There have also been plenty of wet years, the mid-seventies were quite wet for instance, the ecology survives both, and farmers grow rice when water is plentiful,and don’t when it is not.

    • RyaN says:

      11:49am | 28/11/11

      How old is this picture? If you want to be taken seriously then at least try not to paint a picture that is not true, especially considering the current situation.

      Just like that hypocrite Tim Flannery, the same one who lives at sea level in Berowra, yes the very same one that told us that sea levels will rise 25 meters.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-C7OPUg9Lo&t=366 he used the word “grave danger”.
      He also famously claimed that Australia would be in a state of permanent drought.
      I guess we shouldn’t be surprised from the “flat earth” alarmists, apparently these people have a “theory” we should all just “believe” that the earth is flat. Computer models told them so!

    • Steve says:

      01:31pm | 28/11/11

      You lost me at :
      “The Minister could also set up an independent scientific panel to assess the plan”
      More millions wasted on “scineticians’ doing nothing but more create moreBS reports.
      If a fraction of the money that has been wasted on “reports, conferences, etc etc” actually went on real engineering solutions, we wouldn’t have environmental disasters

    • Col. of Blackburn says:

      06:35pm | 28/11/11

      Dr Sinclair
      I suggest you put away your copy of the report and read a little Dorothea MacKellar. Of course the Murray was in bad shape the last ten years, we were in a prolonged drought. nothing special about that in Australia. I’m told that the last three years there has been water in Lake Eyre. Instead of wasting $10B on this, it is better to spend it on more water storages.

    • Little Joe says:

      07:52am | 29/11/11

      27 comments in 24hrs ..... obviously very few really care!!!

    • James says:

      10:42am | 29/11/11

      This is why nothing gets done in this country and we progress at a rate way behind even those we deride as stupid and backward (like the Southern US).  The farmers are too set in their ways and too autocratic - and so are the Greens.  The government is trying to appease both while fending off an opposition keen to get cheap political points out of this.  Issues have no decisive action and endless argument to account for every “interest group” affected by hypothetical outcomes and it achieves exactly nothing.

    • Occam's Blunt Razor says:

      11:24am | 29/11/11

      Why aren’t you campaigning for the removal of all river infrastructure?

      Shouldn’t the Murray be returned to it’s natural state with no dams or barrages?  Isn’t that what you want?

      Then we could see what happens naturally to the river in summer let alone a drought.

    • kimo says:

      01:00pm | 08/02/12

      Perhaps too we sohuld be continuing to question the wisdom of maintaining two very large lakes that used to be tidal as freshwater lakes?  (High evaporation losses for????) and the reduction in tidal flow into and out of these lakes would have been contributing to the sanding up of the river mouth and the build-up of salty water in the Coorong.Perhaps too we could have a rational conversation about the relative merits of running scarce water all the way along the Darling evaporation channel from Qld to SA for use by SA irrigators vs using the water in Qld?Just because we have been stupid for years doesn’t mean that we have to keep on being stupid.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

Daniel Piotrowski

Australia. Where you die for your country and get a rest area named after you http://t.co/hO6LpfwDvI

ToryShepherd

@benpobjie @jessadamson7 @jhwakelin kinda creepy from a high school cheerleader #misheardlyrics

ToryShepherd

RT @leysie: Kate Legge on the last days of Hazel Hawke and Bob's farewell serenade. Warning: it will make you cry. http://t.co/iBDFBw74DJ

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter