History is littered with good intentions gone bad and concerns are growing the Government’s recently released draft Murray Darling Basin Plan is a prime example.

Too much of a good thing.

Frontline environmentalists, who live and work with the vagaries of the rivers, are warning that the Government is heading down the wrong track and could be responsible for allowing wetlands, which not even the worst drought in living memory could kill, to be severely damaged as a result of over-watering.

If we have above average rainfall over the next 12 months the world’s largest river red gum forest is facing the very real prospect of being degraded within three years of it being declared a national park, and two years before the Federal Government has signed off on an environmental watering plan.

Australian irrigators are widely regarded to be amongst the world’s best. They are ready to help this nation’s newest and largest irrigator, the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder (CEWH), administered by bureaucrats from agencies like Treasury and Prime Minister and Cabinet, understand how the rivers work and how to manage water to maximise outcomes.

The Government currently holds, controls or jointly manages over 2.1 million megalitres of water entitlements across the Murray Darling Basin which it is using to flood irrigate wetlands, including the Lower Lakes in South Australia.

We are pleading with the Government to not destroy our wetlands and environmental assets by ignoring experience and relying on computer models. We are very willing to help them understand what is actually happening on and around the river.

The failure of the Government to establish the Australia’s largest irrigator in the communities where irrigation operations are undertaken is a vital mistake and needs to be rectified.

The irrigation bureaucracy that is the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder is already spawning and breeding in Canberra while the Government is advocating a model of ‘localism’. How can there be ‘localism’ if there is no local presence?

Water, killing precious red gums with kindness

Work done for the Living Murray program, available on the Murray Darling Basin Commission website makes the following points about river red gum forests:

“In the Barmah Forest the duration of natural floods ranged from one to seven months … if flooding duration is too long, soil oxygen is depleted and red gums will be either killed or gradually replaced by other plant communities.

“Complete drying between floods is needed to ensure that the soil is aerated.

“An average depth of 1 metre across the floodplain ensures adequate watering of red gum seedlings. Larger (or deeper) floods might cause seedlings to be immersed in water for too long a period and result in drowning.”

Danger for the world’s largest river red gum forest

The Barmah-Millewa Forest on the Murray River upstream of Echuca is the world’s largest river red gum forest. It was the first site ever to be granted an environmental water allocation through an intergovernmental agreement in 1993 granting 100GL/yr guaranteed allocation and a further 50GL/y dependent on water availability sourced equally from the NSW and Victorian water resources. 

The forest is also an Icon Site under the Living Murray Program and can access additional environmental flows from that program’s 486 GL.

In the late 1990s it was noticed that higher river flows to meet downstream requirements was leading to sections of the forest suffering from over-inundation.

In NSW the (then) State Forest Commission, Department of Land and Water Conservation along with local landholders and Murray Irrigation developed a program for environmental works and measures to place regulators in the Forest to manage flows and allow for the necessary drying cycle. The project was jointly funded by the State Government and Murray Irrigation shareholders.

It’s an excellent example of local communities finding solutions to balance environmental needs with socio-economic outcomes. 

Most recently the forest has been in flood since late winter 2010 with natural flows (flooding) continuing through the summer of 2010/11. It has now received additional ‘top up’ flows from a number of sources including the NSW Government’s Barmah-Millewa Environmental Water Allocation and the Living Murray Program.

Already parts of the forest have been underwater for longer than the usual duration of natural floods (one to seven months). Advice is that the forest needs to be drained in the next twelve months or there is a danger of significant environmental damage due to too much water.

The concern is not limited to the actual watering of the Barmah-Millewa forest, but also running the river at higher levels to deliver water for downstream requirements.

A major physical constraint known as the Barmah Choke is there and regardless of good intentions, any flows that exceed the natural constraint (8,500megs/day) without adequate management of the forest regulators does not simply flow downstream without first spilling into the forest.

As the MDBC research highlights, river red gums need at least eighteen months between flooding events to dry out. It is not in the interest of the long term health of the Barmah-Millewa forest to be flooded every summer because the Government wants to run the Murray River above natural flow constraints to get water downstream, leading to a flood of sorts every year.

The verge of catastrophe

The Government cannot ignore the physical constraints in the rivers. They are real and to not fully consider the unintended consequences brought about by pushing water into the forest while attempting to deliver water downstream will end in disaster for the world’s largest river red gum forest.

It would be a travesty if the Government, not nature, was responsible for significantly altering the Barmah-Millewa floodplains leading to the environmental degradation and potential drowning of significant areas of river red gum forests and associated wetlands.

Good intentions should not be allowed to destroy our environment or the social and economic fabric of our communities. As frontline environmentalist we can help, we want to help and we have decades of invaluable practical on the ground experience to share.

Most commented

19 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Steve says:

      05:05am | 15/12/11

      Far to practical and sensible.
      You really need to talk about millions of deaths etc etc to get noticed by the chattering classes.

    • Against the Man says:

      07:26am | 15/12/11

      No worries, Gillard will solve this in 2012 after she helps CT cheat on his homework and ........ wink

    • persephone says:

      08:07am | 15/12/11

      Oh, look - environmentalists, including the park managers, are fully aware of the potential problems of over watering the park and are looking at ways to ensure it doesn’t happen.

      http://users.mcmedia.com.au/stocky/barmah_millewa.html

      So instead of masquerading behind a mask of faux environmentalism, if you’re seriously worried about the future of the forest, your efforts will be directed at ensuring the necessary works are carried out, to regulate the flow of water in the forest in a way which benefits both it and irrigators.

      Most of the water (96%) of the water used for environmental purposes in the Barmah finds its way back into the river system, and is thus available to irrigators downstream.

      It’s no surprise that irrigators like the author feel threatened, however. Sooner or later, the penny is going to drop; irrigating pasture on a permanent basis is unsustainable, environmentally and economically. The future is to return large areas of presently irrigated land to dryland pasture, retaining it only for high value cropping, and for contraction of many types of farming industries back up nearer to the source of the river.

      At present, it can require the release of several units of water to provide one downstream, with the bulk of it lost to evaporation and seepage. Contracting water intensive enterprises closer to the source of water would mean a far more effective and efficient use of water, and make the task of providing environmental flows much easier.

      Of course, that would mean massive changes for irrigators, but now you’ve made me aware of how deeply they care for the environment, I’m sure they’ll find accepting these much easier.

    • Against the Man says:

      03:54pm | 15/12/11

      Pers where have you been? Have you given up on Labor and joined the 71% of this country?

    • Jane2 says:

      09:26am | 15/12/11

      My favourite comment in the media this year was about Jindabyne releasing water. It was something about “environmental flows”....it is easy to do “environmental flows” when your dam is full to overflowing and the snow melt is around the corner so you must release water or cause flooding.

      The fact the headline made it seem like a win for environmental movement that for the first time in 40 years they were releasing water, the amusing part as its the first time since the dam was built that it has been full.

      Headlines and facts rarely align.

    • On The River says:

      09:35am | 15/12/11

      Persephone - Since you are so well informed you would be aware that the irrigators in the Murray Irrigation districts of NSW have been directing efforts towards ensuring necessary works are carried out in both the Barmah-Millewa and Koondrook Perricoota forests.

      In fact it was Murray Irrigation shareholders together with the then State Forest Commission who first identified issues with forest degradation in the Millewa Forest due to continual running the river at high levels and then took steps to design and construct regulators so that they could ensure the forest could get the drying phase it so desperately needed.  This work was not funded by environmental groups.  It was funded by the Government and irrigators through a levy on their water charges.

      Similarly a group of irrigators have been working with the Living Murray program to develop environmental works in the Koondrook Perricoota forest.

      Unfortunately your wealth of knowledge doesn’t extend to irrigation methods.  Only a very small portion of irrigators water permenant pasture because, as you say, this is often not an economical use of water.  In the Murray Irrigation districts most irrigators produce annual crops, wheat, rice, corn or canola to name a few.  They do not permenantly water these crops.  If the water is available in any given year - they will decide which crop to grow to achieve the best return on their water use.  If there is no water - they don’t plant a crop.

      High security irrigators need permenant access to water because they have permenant plants like orchards, nuts or grapes.  But then that is why they have a higher value, higher reliability product.

      But as it is clear we all care deeply for the environment, I look forward to seeing you out here helping us fence of strands of native vegetation at your own expense or facilitating the watering of wetlands on our farms that we have removed from productive use to encourage biodiversity or designing a salt interception scheme for the district to help improve the quality of water that returns to the system.  And you can help us erradicate ferral weeds and animals (again at your own cost) that stray onto our land from the breeding grounds of the national parks.

      Look forward to seeing you there!

    • Lezza says:

      11:19am | 15/12/11

      Interesting reading until the silly, cheap shots toward the end.

    • Gus says:

      09:49am | 15/12/11

      Those Red gum forest have been there for 25000 years, long before irrigators were around. How is increasing environmental flows unnatural??

      The open channel systems used by irrigators along the MDB are inefficient method of water delivery because up to 28% of water allocation in lost to evaporation and seepage, if we improved irrigation infrastructure to minimise conveyance losses we could increase environmental flows without reducing output on farms, and Tom wouldn’t need to spend his time writing about how over allocation of water is actually good for the environment.

      It’s crazy that in these times of water scarcity we are still using primitive methods of water delivery for irrigation.

    • PsychoHyena says:

      12:05pm | 15/12/11

      @Gus and this is what the Greens have in their policy on sustainable agriculture, but apparently they’re out to get the farmers.

    • Jane2 says:

      12:56pm | 15/12/11

      Gus, they are covering in the channels atc. Its one of the major projects that is ongoing in the area. However there is A LOT of channels and most are on private land so it is not a quick process.

    • Roscoe says:

      10:05am | 15/12/11

      How typical of this article to not even mention the Coorong or anything to do with South Australia.

      Typical eastern states mentality.

    • Eastern State Mentality Person says:

      07:54pm | 15/12/11

      South who? Oh you guys down there at the bottom end of the system…oh yeah..forgot about youse. We’ll send you a few megalitres if we have any left…ok? Fair enough?

    • Mark says:

      11:08am | 15/12/11

      Small point of correction: The CEWH is an independent statutory position and is supported by officers from the Department of Sustainabilty, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, not Treasury and PM&C

    • subotic says:

      11:55am | 15/12/11

      Bah, humbug. Higgs Boson will fix it…..

    • RyaN says:

      12:04pm | 15/12/11

      But, but that esteemed Tim Flannery who is the chief climate change advisor to our glorious government said we would be in a state of permanent drought!

      Oh I get it now, he is a big fat LIAR, just like Gillard (There will be no carbon tax under a government I lead!). Should have known when he said that sea levels were going to rise 23m and then went and bought a property at sea level. Clearly doesn’t believe his own bullshit, neither does Carbon Cate Blanchette who also recently bought a property at sea level, on the sea.

    • Graham S says:

      01:13pm | 15/12/11

      In 1919 US Army Engineers using 19th century technology, know how and equipment built a 4000 kilometre long inland canal along the US eastern seaboard known as The Inter Coastal as a means of safe inland water transport route for barges and the like to avoid the uncertainties, hazards and dangers of the Atlantic ocean as a means of transporting goods back and for the from the South & North. Why the hell cannot a similar grandiose scheme be designed for inland Australia?  With 1/3 of Australia knowing only wet & dry seasons, with billions of mega litres flowing out to sea imagine if a percentage of this water was directed via a canal that need only be 2 metres deep by 30 metres wide from Northern Queensland connecting to the Murray Darling.
      Every wet season the canal would be flushed out by millions said litres being directed south, an inland canal based transport industry would be set-up allowing goods being shipped back & forth, the irrigation options would be phenomenal, the development of inland towns and cities, tourism opportunities, the potential is mind boggling. You would be able to take a boat from Albury to Central Queensland. A creative Federal Government approach to a mega project of this scale would be enormous instead we have bickering, petty pointless state based bureaucrats who couldn’t agree on a time for lunch squabbling over the current approach to the Murray Darling.
      Grand scale thinking is a swear word in this country as can be confirmed by the existing current collection of Parliamentary no-hopers unlike the great thinkers of US politics in the 19th century who developed this scheme. Imagine 21st century mining technology building an inland canal in Australia. Google Inter coastal to read about this phenomenal engineering project & the benefits still being enjoyed today as a result of positive future thinkers over a century ago.

    • the labor landslide says:

      01:21pm | 15/12/11

      Please use sea water fresh water from the city desalination plants for inland Australia instead of real water from the real rivers..
      What did we build desalination plants for?

    • Concave says:

      03:32pm | 15/12/11

      I thought it was pretty simple. Wet/dry cycle is getting drier for longer and wetter in shorter intervals. We try to reverse this by using weirs and pooling the water. The higher wetlands no longer get the frequency of floods they require while the lower areas are permanently flooded. Both situations FUBAR the local ecosystems. In the mean time irrigation is expanding, siphoning off the volume that does sit in the wier pools (because business is business and has to keep growing).

      Here’s that word again. Unsustainable.

      The effects are most pronounced at the end of the line, South Australia. And no, I’m not from there but I sure as hell sympathise with them as they are getting the worst of this.

    • Ian Robinson says:

      03:10pm | 16/12/11

      Hi Tom - Good to talk with you in Deniliquin today. 

      There is a lot of local involvement in environmental water management at present as we have a network of partners including local environmental water advisory committees and catchment management authorities (CMAs). For example the Deniliquin based Murray CMA is very involved in managing and monitoring the outcomes of water use.  The link below provides information on this work. http://www.environment.gov.au/ewater/southern/murray/fish-monitoring-project.html

      We welcome all local suggestions about how environmental water should be used and about delivery arrangements.  All local groups can provide suggestions to us and to the existing state and local arrangements. No doubt we can build and improve the existing arrangements so thanks for the offer to assist.

      Ian Robinson - Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder

      PS. We have staff who have worked in CMAs, for state water agencies, NSW Farmers Association, National Water Commission, River Murray Water ......

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@SuperCalipso Guess fear that if it went down would be off agenda for years. & other nations not needed one. Like us they have elected MPs.

Paul Colgan

Just reading through the replies to @KRuddMP - mostly supportive, but some appalling abuse from people who disagree

Malcolm Farr

KRudd's support for gay marriage a personal shift but it has political consequences. http://t.co/fdQUIcaJfR

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ToryShepherd: Onya, @KRuddMP“@newscomauHQ: BREAKING: Kevin Rudd has come out in support of same sex marriage: http://t.co/CFaHrxyV5G

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter