Oprah Winfrey (depending on which figures you believe) has anywhere between 25 and 45 million people tuning in every week to watch her uplifting combination of positive thinking and self-acceptance. 

Happiness takes a lifetime, unless you meet Oprah. Photo: Getty.

This “Oprah Movement” love Oprah and they hang on her every word – if Oprah says Australia is a nice place then somewhere between 25 and 45 million people are going to believe it. 

That is why Julia is so keen to be on the show and give Oprah a warm Prime Ministerial hug. 

However, while we should be grateful for Oprah’s endorsement it might pay to pause and consider what it is that we might be endorsing in return.

The Oprah Movement might best be summarized as the search for a shortcut to happiness except that Oprah and her followers are convinced she has already found it. 

There is even a section on her website entitled “shortcut to HAPPINESS” which includes such helpful articles as “How to awaken joy in your life” and the “Are You Happy? Quiz”. 

The upshot of most of this advice is that you are probably not happy and if you are not happy then it is your fault.  The solution is to think your way out of your problems by thinking positively and embracing the Law of Attraction.  And here is where things start to get a little disturbing…

I will probably be accused of being bitter, cynical, negative, and many other colourful things but the fact that Oprah and so many people take the construct of “positive thinking” as the ultimate solution as to how other people can improve their own circumstances is something that I find very troubling and a little bit scary.

You’ve probably heard of positive thinking and its supposed benefits.  You’ve also probably heard of things like The Secret, which is a self-help book and DVD (and they have other products, too, including a daily planner and something called an “affirmation journal”). 

If you have had heard of such things it is largely due to the efforts of Oprah Winfrey who has been an enthusiastic devotee of the concepts involved and been quick to popularise them among her following. 

For those of you who have had the good fortune to not have come into contact with The Secret, the basic premise is something that sounds pretty innocuous at first, if you don’t examine it too closely or think about it too hard: there is something called “the Law of Attraction,” which posits that the individual can attract their own good or bad circumstances in life just by thinking about them.

What needs to be stressed here, of course, is the bit about the “bad circumstances”.  On the plus side this is what you are buying into: I can attract good things by using my thoughts. If I think positively, I will attract good things.

However, the other side of such a dichotomy is quite abhorrent for anyone among us who might have health issues and other problems beyond individual control.  Take someone with a genetic condition for example like Cystic Fibrosis. 

According to the dubious logic employed in Oprah’s favourite book The Secret, such people have somehow attracted this.  And, according to The Secret, they can think their way out of it. They can be cured!

Oh, wait. Cystic Fibrosis does not have a cure, and certified medical professionals generally do not recommend people thinking their way out of a chronic condition.

However, according to the “Law of Attraction,” if the sufferers don’t think their way out of their condition, or can’t, then they basically deserve whatever happens to them. They brought it on themselves after all.  Let’s not even start on things like being hit by a drunk driver or a nationwide famine.

Therein lies the problem: This type of philosophy places an untoward emphasis on the individual: You control your reality. You control what happens to you. You control how much money you make. You deserve the best.

Solving problems or helping others is beneath you, because it is all about you. You’ve got the world at your feet and it’s yours for the taking. Why help others, when you can just attract everything you want with your thoughts? 

It’s a great philosophy if you are a comfortable middle-class citizen of the Western First World but it guarantees a miserable existence for anyone not so fortunate.

By now, you are probably starting to see exactly why this way of thinking is so troubling, particularly if you have feminist leanings like a certain Prime Minister, have a disability or are remotely aware of social justice issues. 

Oprah and the peddlers of positivism are selling pipe dreams, at the dangerous expense of reality.  The Happiness Movement has become the Oprah Movement and moved into cult territory, with all the attendant commercial exploitation and bogus results.

But what’s the real harm?  Surely, if nothing else, a bit of positive thinking can make you feel better can’t it?  Isn’t Oprah simply lifting our spirits and letting a little sunshine into our lives?  No. 

Like any cult, the Oprah Movement tends to attract those people with low self-esteem – the very people who most crave the shortcut to happiness.  As a recent study conducted at the University of Waterloo in Canada pointed out the problem with combining positive thinking and low self-esteem is that it actually makes people feel worse about themselves. 

By trying to focus on how their lives could be so much better it tends to make them more depressed about their lives right now.  Instead of making them feel more in control of their destiny it actually makes them feel like they have less control.

So when our Prime Minister gives Oprah that hug as she represents what we fondly refer to as ‘The Lucky Country” I hope she points out to Oprah and all her followers that we are indeed lucky.  Our circumstances are not a function of positive thinking or self-affirmations so much as a result of hard work and incredible good luck.

I hope she reminds the Oprah Movement that those of us who have been so lucky have an obligation to help those less fortunate.  We help them not by telling them to think more positively but by recognising that their circumstances may not be of their own making and that they might even be victims of bad luck.  We help them by recognising that positive thinking can’t help them but we can. 

Then rather than think positively about helping them we actually do it.  If Oprah wants to make that the new mantra of the Oprah Movement then I am happy to have the Prime Minister endorse her.  Imagine the power of 25 to 45 million people willing to physically make the world a better place rather than just think about it.

Now there is a positive thought.

83 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • TChong says:

      06:09am | 13/12/10

      Well writ Brett. Sad to see so many ( possibly / probaly ? ) normal women (and some men) who are devoted to this crap, and all things Oprah.
      Ms Winfrey would appear to have a bit of The Messiah ( complex) about her, and she has plenty of devotees who want / need to believe in something , so a perfect match has arisen.
      With the slavish preoccupation / devotion Ms O inspires in some, I reckon she could quite easily do another Jones Town, and some of her Followers would do so, willingly. Scary Stuff .

    • Old Clive says:

      07:09am | 13/12/10

      Same scary stuff about the followers of Foolya Joolya, there’s no accounting for peoples thinking, a bit like the difference between psychiatry and psychology, is it a sickness or just a case of being stupid.

    • TChong says:

      07:33am | 13/12/10

      The difference Old Clive , is that in the Australian political enviroment, we are very fortunate, that for the most part, very few of us are as devoted to political allegiances , as Winfreys devotees are , to the O.
      Most of us can see thru the smoke and mirrors, and snake oil both sides of Oz politics produce.
      With the Winfresians, its seems to be all slack jawed, wide eyed amazement at any, and everything the lady does- not good.

    • Ironside says:

      08:49am | 13/12/10

      Good lord I may have just had a heart attack from the surprise of actually agreeing with something written by TChong. Oprah and her ilk such as doctor phil, are the ultimate PR people. They have identified the most vulnerable target audience and are pandering to their fantasies. Of course they are targeting middle class western stay at home mums (and dads) who else is watching TV at 1 in the afternoon? Thinking positive will in no way improve your life, only hard work, dedication, the love of your family will improve your circumstances. (although a little bit of luck never hurts…come on with the lotto win)

    • Jarryd says:

      09:21am | 13/12/10

      Oprah has way too much power in her hands. It is indeed scary stuff!

      I didn’t mind her up until she started promoting ‘The Secret’ crap a few years ago. I’m a Christian, and that is really just pure evil being sold to 30 million people. Believing that you are your own God is not the secret to becoming successful in life + becoming rich.

      What concerns me most is that she is an idol to people. I mean, some people spend hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to meet her.. for what!?! She’s a flipping human being!

      end rant.

    • Jarryd says:

      09:23am | 13/12/10

      Oprah has way too much power in her hands. It is indeed scary stuff!

      I didn’t mind her up until she started promoting ‘The Secret’ crap a few years ago. I’m a Christian, and that is really just pure evil being sold to 30 million people. Believing that you are your own God is not the secret to becoming successful in life + becoming rich.

      What concerns me most is that she is an idol to people. I mean, some people spend hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to meet her.. for what!?! She’s a flipping human being!

      end rant.

    • Reg says:

      10:09am | 13/12/10

      Yes it must come as a shock Ironsides to discover that Labor supporters are indeed more moderate than you are accustomed to encountering in the company you keep.

      I think O performs a necessary function in the community, a distraction for those deprived of individual initiative. People like accountants and bored house-wives. What’s this about Oprah having far too much power in her hands? If everyone was as moderate as she, considering the sway she has, the world would be a better place. It’s only froth and bubble after-all. Just one thing…pul-eeese… no more Tom Cruise, it might go down in the US but it’s straight down the tubes here.

    • Reg says:

      11:25am | 13/12/10

      Spoken like a true faux liberal depressive Ironsides. “Thinking positive will in no way improve your life, only hard work, dedication, the love of your family will improve your circumstances.”

      In case you ever need some advise Ironsides, it’s thinking positive that gets you beyond the agonies of life and keeps you away from ending it all.

      Paste it on the fridge for next time hard work doesn’t make it, or your child rejects your affection or becomes suicidal.

    • Sheldon says:

      06:32am | 13/12/10

      Its just spiritual humanism

    • James1 says:

      11:59am | 13/12/10

      Is it just me, or does the word “spiritual” make you think of people with scented candles, dreamcatchers, and American Indian themed posters?  Quickly followed by an urge to vomit…

    • bec says:

      12:15pm | 13/12/10

      Me too. I grew up on the loopy north coast of NSW, where every dickhead charlatan and their non-desexed dog had some sort of crystal collection. The greediest, rudest and most unpleasant people I have ever dealt with in my life are those who believe in karma, chakra healing and all that revolting late 1990s new-age spiritualism.

    • Joan says:

      06:43am | 13/12/10

      You must have missed it… but PM Gillard got booed at Federation Square when she met Oprah the Queen of Couchpotatoes. ... you can watch it on Andrew Bolt blog. The Queen of Couchpotatoes watched daily in USA by $7.2 million daytime TV,  7.2 million idle unproductive hours. At least Melbourne wasn’t as silly as Sydney with the big O on the bridge and the fireworks and Kenneally waxing lyrical that Sydney Opera House is Oprah house or something similar. Oprah looks amazed at hysterical reception in Oz ... and so am I.

    • Concerned denier says:

      09:33am | 13/12/10

      Bolt has taken time off from his climate change research to follow Oprah?
      We don’t have time for this nonsense.
      Bolt must save us from the climate change scientists and their evil plan to save the world.
      Come on Bolt - focus -focus - focus. Get those data sets in for peer review before we are forced to do something about this climate change.

    • Reg says:

      10:25am | 13/12/10

      Now listen here Joanie, life has many facets, some of them will not be to your’s or to my taste, but I would never deny the others from pursuing their little joys as long as they’re not stalking me. You have your own little potato-couch there in front of the computer and this woman makes some minds sing, so and I’m very happy for them. I have not the slightest objection to this, because the opposite is dreadful to behold.

      I wouldn’t object if Kenneally and mates decided to torture the prisoners at Long Bay by permanently looping Oprah shows. It could be quite passivated.  One last thing. I hated the Beatles and I still do, but I’m happy for those who don’t.

    • Leah says:

      10:10pm | 13/12/10

      Concerned Denier - 10 points for the Five Iron Frenzy reference wink

    • OpenMinded says:

      07:28am | 13/12/10

      I think you’ve missed the overall point. Positive thinking is more to do with making the best out of a situation, even ‘bad’ situation’. The example of a cystic fibrosis sufferer was ridiculous and extreme - no one would ever expect someone to consider themselves responsible for a condition such as that because of their attitude! That said, whether you choose to make the best of a situation (and think positively) is down to the individual. From experience, people who are able to do this can come from all walks of life, including the socially disadvantaged, the disabled etc

    • A Bob says:

      10:45am | 13/12/10

      No, I think you are the one who has missed the point. The article isn’t saying people shouldn’t try to make the best of a bad situation, it’s talking about the extreme notions that just wishing for something will make it happen, with no real action by the individual.

      This is not new. One of Norman Vincent Peale’s books, the father of ‘positive thinking’, recounts how one lady won the lottery three times in a row just by being absolutely certain it would happen. That’s not positive thinking, that’s magical thinking.

      It comes into faith healing too. Where a healing fails it’s because the subject didn’t have enough faith. As if a omnipotent god should be limited by such a thing.

      Having spent a year as a volunteer counsellor I’ve seen the damage these bogus pop-psych fads can do. Trying the get people back into a mind of realistic expectaions formed a large part of our sessions. Many did feel guilty that their afflictions weren’t affected by this bunkum. Making them feel guilty is part of the hook. “Your’e not trying hard enough, spend more money!”

      “no one would ever expect someone to consider themselves responsible for a condition such as that because of their attitude!”

      Sorry, but yes, they do. It’s the foundation stone of many a cult and it’s evil.

    • Duff says:

      12:33pm | 13/12/10

      @A Bob - but the Waterloo Study was not about magical thinking.  Just positive thinking - self-affirmations in fact.  The author suggests that this study proves that positive thinking is bad for people with low self-esteem.  Not magical thinking.  So I don’t think OpenMinded missed the point.  There seems to be two points: one that magical thinking is bad (agreed) and one that positive thiinking is bad (not agreed).

    • A Bob says:

      01:22pm | 13/12/10

      I think the problem is the abuse of the term ‘positive thinking’. My reading of the Waterloo study was that the ‘positive thinking’ was not really that at all, but rather faux positivism.

      Positive thinking that embraces personal responsibility can be very healthy, but it must also allow for the fact that life may still end up sucking no matter what we do. None of the self-help industry movements are prepared to state this sobering truth.

      I counselled people who were in recovery, not acutely ill. As a volunteer I wasn’t qualified to deal with seriously sick people. But it was impressed upon me that one of the biggest dangers to people who were on the upward slope that serious, sometimes suicidal, relapses could occur when their hopes were lifted higher than reality allows by this sort of snake oil. Even the “every day I get better and better” mantra that was popular at the time was dangerous. It isn’t that simple. Some days it’s better, but then it can suck again. The key was to try and look at things over time, like months, to see a gradual net improvement.

      Reall positivism involves hard work. Nothing wrong with encouragement, but the Oprah style stuff is no different from Internet get-rich-quick-scams. I have a ton of happiness in a Nigerian back account, wanna help me get some of out for a slice of the action?

    • Duff says:

      01:58pm | 13/12/10

      @A Bob, wise advice, by the sounds of it.  I’m still trying to work through all this, because on the face of it I can see why it is definitely not helpful to attribute good/bad luck simply to one’s attitude.  It is similar to why I am skeptical of the right-wing, free marketeers: they often think that success is simply due to ‘hard work’ etc. and don’t appreciate how much luck has to do with it.
      Yet, we all know those people who are so positive, so uplifting, they seem to make good things happen.  Their attitude allows them to push through adversity and often their positive ‘vibes’ are inspiring.  And, on a personal level, I know that if I’m feeling positive, confident etc. I get more accomplished.  So i can’t say I want to discount the power of positive thinking entirely.  I’m sure neither would you.
      But I agree that this ‘magical’ thinking is crap and should be rubbished.
      One thought, however: people are very literal and we like a good myth to inspire us to do things we wouldn’t otherwise achieve.  eg. Mother Theresa probably wouln’t have committed her entire life to helping orphans if she didn’t genuinely believe she was doing God’s work.  Sometimes we have to believe in things to do great things and i wonder if we took that away what would we be left with?

    • Shifter says:

      03:22pm | 13/12/10

      @A Bob - “Your’e not trying hard enough, spend more money!”

      Kind of sounds like Scientology there doesn’t it?

    • A Bob says:

      03:38pm | 13/12/10

      I was involved with Scientology in my younger days. Not a member, but they were wooing me hard. When I finally stated that it was rubbish I was branded an “SP” - Suppressive Person. One writer said that any religion can exist without a god, but none without a devil. The SP is Scientologies devil, the person we can blame for all our failings. The creed says they are “fair game” and can be killed if they can get away with it.

      Yep, Scientology was one of the groups I had in mind while writing my posts but they are not the only ones who work on the basis of undermining people in order to promise saving them (at a price.).

    • BT says:

      07:55am | 13/12/10

      Say what you want, but I got tickets and am very excited! Yes it’s all been blown out of proportion and Julia Gillard fawning over Oprah is revolting, but I’m going to have a great day on the harbour, enjoy the show (particularly Bon Jovi performing) and will enjoy chatting to people from all over Australia. Oprah will showcase how beautiful Australia is (even if none of its’ citizens can afford to live here any more) and hopefully tourists will come. People complain about the cost, but the world cup bid was a huge flop that cost $45m - this cost far less and has a positive message with global exposure.

    • Stace says:

      08:10am | 13/12/10

      I have always felt that the only benefit of positive thinking is that it leads to positive action. You are more likely to go out and do something if you’re thinking positively; also people respond to you more positively in general if you project a positive attitude. But nothing comes of thinking alone; it must be translated into action and attitude.

      Did you know that your facial expression influences your mood, as well as the other way around? So smile, and you’ll think positively! wink

    • Bryndal says:

      12:49pm | 13/12/10

      What if you have had botox? I have heard that reseach is showing people with Botox (who cant smile properly) have higher rates of depression. Having said that to thibnk that somehow because you think something (a lot) it will happen. If so why is Hey Hey Its Saturday still on TV - as I regularly think it is a pile of crap that should be taken off the air.

    • James1 says:

      01:13pm | 13/12/10

      Very true, Bryndal.  I have been asking the universe for a PS3 for nearly two years - the universe wouldn’t cough it up so I had to go and buy one myself.  Stingy bloody universe.

    • Reg says:

      01:55pm | 13/12/10

      Good on you Stace. Listen to all these negative pricks. smile Smiling and positivity is how both car salesmen and nice people work.  I know a guy who says he doesn’t trust people who smile. No bullshit. Of course he comes from Sydney and was an old man when he was 17.

    • Oprah house..comon!! says:

      02:32pm | 13/12/10

      Well said Stace!

    • BK says:

      03:34pm | 13/12/10

      Some people have faces that often smile some don’t. Niether group is happier than the other.

    • Jade says:

      04:16pm | 13/12/10

      I agree Stace! And I always try and tell people that there is always a positive to a negative… they never listen though, they would rather sit there and cry raspberry

    • Stace says:

      04:33pm | 13/12/10

      Bryndal, I believe I recall reading research that showed people with Botox actually felt things less strongly, had less extreme emotional reactions to things, than people who could still move their faces. I don’t remember where I read it, though. Very interesting!

    • Richard The Lionheart says:

      08:20am | 13/12/10

      The divine Ms O must retreat to her Australian hotel suite with amazement at our desperate need for fulfilment. Joolya moved herself to be directly behind Ms O for the camera to bask in a halo which can never be hers. Politicians cheapened themselves at her altar and the expected tourists will never arrive. Certainly not the demographic that watches that show. My PM is an aethiest… pigs bottom ! Great article Brett.

    • Meow says:

      08:29am | 13/12/10

      Don’t be fooled, Julia lays hands on everybody she meets, friend and foe, male and female, home and abroad, I think it looks a bit tacky,  flirty and unPM but a big hug for Opera may be O.K, could be in the small print.

    • Meow says:

      08:29am | 13/12/10

      Don’t be fooled, Julia lays hands on everybody she meets, friend and foe, male and female, home and abroad, I think it looks a bit tacky,  flirty and unPM but a big hug for Opera may be O.K, could be in the small print.

    • Bex says:

      08:40am | 13/12/10

      Direct quote from the ninemsn website about a “hysterical” Oprah fan: “She’s the queen and Elvis is the king and all I have to do is meet him now.”


      I had to read it 3 times to make sure I wasn’t reading it wrong. Pretty much says it all about her fan base.

    • Lazy Jesus says:

      09:24am | 13/12/10

      Oh that women in the green top losing her shit over Oprah is hysterical. I could watch her all day. Here’s a quick snippet of her performance for you to marvel at;

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFLuRbTYWxI

      Sadly, its not even close to the whole she-bang.

    • Daniel says:

      08:59am | 13/12/10

      When Julia met with Oprah I couldn’t help feeling that it was just bad for her reputation. Oprah is a talk show host. What the hell is our Prime Minister doing being seen with her? Then I realised she must be one of her fans, and that is what is embarrassing.

    • Lions den says:

      10:04am | 13/12/10

      Sorry,
      what is the embarrassing bit, you lost me.

    • Eric says:

      03:20pm | 13/12/10

      It’s not just embarrassing for Julia.

      Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, also worshipped at the altar of Oprah.

    • Reg says:

      07:49pm | 13/12/10

      Admit it Daniel, you’re a fan of Ray Martin. Never mind about the “worshiping at the alter.” If you want to compare the local boy to O, she is an engaging personality while the other is a stick of sloppy rhubarb, yet you’d all hang off his boring utterances. What does that say about Australian audiences? Now that’s embarrassment.

      Giving the lady a word of approval registers with the voters who like her. Didn’t you know that Eric?

    • Chris says:

      09:37am | 13/12/10

      OK here are my three blood boiling rants that the Oprah circus has brought up for me:
      1.) Watching Keneally and Gillard swarm all over every latest media circus makes me cringe. How cheap are these leaders? Are they really that desperate to connect with people through celebrity rather than policy? Arrrrggghhhh this labor media whore spin style is so sickening. Does Keneally really think she will make me forget about how bad the government has been and get my vote because she walks next to and gushes all over celebrities?

      2.) I suspect it is not popular for me to say but am I the only one who does not like how cheap and corny Oprah and her followers can be?  How can you really trust someone that says it is soooooo good when she is getting such big bucks to say so? I feel like she just buys her followers by supplying them with lavish gifts like trips to Australia. Surely and unfortunately this latest tourism push is likely to fail while the Australian dollar is one of the most expensive to buy in the world.

      3.) Why do Australians have to be told we are ok from foreigner?  Why do our journo’s have to ask celebrities over and over again various versions of ‘do you like us’?

    • bec says:

      09:53am | 13/12/10

      The thing I hate most about that Law of Attraction guff is that it bears frightening resemblance to the prosperity doctrine of those heinous megachurches, neocalvinism, and the Just World Fallacy: namely, that everything good that happens to you happens because you must have been a good person, or because you did something wonderful to deserve it. Conversely, if something bad happens to you, it’s because you’re a horrible person who *must* have earned this. It’s just a way to delude yourself into thinking nothing bad can ever befall you.

      Screw the Law of Attraction, karma, and the Just World Fallacy. Bad things very frequently happen to people who don’t deserve it, and vice versa. You can’t look at kids who are sexually abused, or ex-SS soldiers lounging it up South America way, and tell me that these things happen for a reason.

      A refreshing antidote to Oprah’s sickening and insipid philosophy is the wonderful Barbara Ehrenreich, who is realistic, a critical thinker, and genuinely feminist in a way that the Big O could only hope to be:

      http://barbaraehrenreich.com/brightsided.htm

    • AdamC says:

      10:44am | 13/12/10

      Bec, I remember seeing a TV show attacking Ehrenreich’s book, Nickel and Dimed. Rather than an articulate critic of the cult of blind optimism (which, I agree, can be a problem, a la the Secret), she seems more like a vulgar rabble-rouser of the ubiquitous, ‘America sucks’ variety. I note her Wikipedia entry effectively describes her as a ‘democratic socialist’ activist.

      It is easy to poke fun at positive thinking pop-philosophy. But for those in need of a little motivation, believing that they will be rewarded for their effort is a good thing.

    • bec says:

      11:11am | 13/12/10

      Er, no. I *have* read the book (Bright Sided, that is) and it’s definitely not anti-American. It is deeply critical of the Calvinist bent of the country’s religious roots and the creepy corporate culture of the 1990s, but that isn’t anti-Americanism any more than possession of a university degree or a distaste for poor manners is un-Australian.

      There’s nothing wrong with optimism and being pleasant. There is plenty wrong with being told to swallow a s*** sandwich and smile if things *do* go wrong and there is no justice or fairness to it, just to make people who are more fortunate than you comfortable.

    • Dan says:

      01:03pm | 13/12/10

      I can’t disagree with anything Barbara has said - it is actually pretty close to some thoughts I have been trying to put in an articulate way. The film Revolutionary Road explores this same theme… but then again I haven’t taken my meds today! (must be happy, must be happy, must be happy)

    • BK says:

      10:04am | 13/12/10

      The self-esteem crap is also a worry. It has created a generation of people (mainly women) who always expect to hear what they want to hear and take great offense when they don’t. They have no inclination towards self-improvement, because they think that they are perfect already. They will constantly fail, because their goals are too ambitious.

      They will never be happy.

    • Reg says:

      01:44pm | 13/12/10

      It may well do this, but they are mistaken about the intention of self-esteem.

      Self-esteem is better described as self-respect, just in case your mistaken explanation proliferates. Every relationship has two sides and if either hogs the expectation then both are screwed.

      Self-improvement might selfishly be seen as an opportunity to open up opportunities for one’s self, but it actually opens opportunities for us to provide something to someone else, or to the community. This is where the faux liberals get it all so arse-up.

      You can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear they say. Well, I bet Oprah could.

    • cybacaT says:

      10:11am | 13/12/10

      As with anything I like to weigh up the negative against the positive.  I think by and large Oprah’s having a positive effect on society.  I agree her following is starting to resemble a cult, but most members don’t subscribe to the whacky ideas in The Secret - they’re just watching to feel positive.  So I’m happy to see her here in Australia, especially for the tourist attention she’ll bring.

      I also find it distasteful and desperate that Foolya Joolya is trying to leech onto Oprah during her time here.  It smacks of the same celebrity worship Kevin Rudd had - hoping that some of the star factor reflected on him. I wish out pollies would focus on doing their job well and not screwing up everything they touch for another 3 years.

    • quattromamma says:

      10:20am | 13/12/10

      Yes Brett,  I think I would accuse you of being “bitter, cynical, negative”, but you will have to live with the effects of those attitudes. I accept that curing cancer with happy thoughts is not possible but I wonder if you have in fact read “The Secret”. Law of Attraction asks us to focus on the positives in our lives rather than the crap. When you can do this it becomes much easier to find you way out of an unhappy or destructive situation.
      I am not a massive Oprah fan but what is the danger in helping people improve their outlooks & eventually their lives?

    • Zeta says:

      10:25am | 13/12/10

      The problem with the positive thinking doctrine is the same problem faced by Christianity - the Problem of Evil.

      The Secret, which I’ve read, which is several hours of my life that I can’t get back - still doesn’t address it. ‘Bad things happen because you let them happen’, doesn’t answer the big question. It just gives you noise to fill your head with instead of considering the big question.

      Every ratbag atheist knows the Epicurian arguement - ‘If an all-powerful and perfectly good god exists, then evil does not. There is evil in the world. Therefore, an all-powerful and perfectly good god does not exist.’ Classical propositional calculus.

      It’s application to The Secret is - ‘If I am an all powerfull and perfectly good being, I won’t allow bad things to happen to me. Bad things happen to me. Therefore, I am not all-powerful and perfectly good.’ Therefore the Secret is wrong.

    • stephen says:

      11:25am | 13/12/10

      Well you haven’t really closed the loop on an Almighty Being :
      If a, then not b.
      If b then not a.
      (?)
      But the ‘Secret’s’ relation to positive thinking does not attempt to define an ‘if and only if’ condition : it’s an attitude and not an objective so is not reducible to maths,(but maybe only to Oprah’s production company.)

    • Empire says:

      01:09pm | 13/12/10

      I have never heard of the Epicurean argument before, but I fail to see the logic that if evil exists then God doesn’t.
      Because my logic of believing in God is based partially on the fact that because evil exists( and it does and we all see it )then It makes sense that god exists, because evil would not be in existence without the obvious counterpart good.(my logic anyway)
      The whole bible is based on the battle between good and evil.
      God let his favorite human being be beaten spat on probably raped and murdered.( along with most of his prophets.)
      God lets bad things happen for good reasons.(I obviously don’t understand atheist logic)
      I totally agree with you about “the secret”. The most badly written book I have ever read anyway.
      When I watched the Oprah show about the secret she actually humiliated the author, and said I don’t understand why its called the secret, I have known about this for years.( not that I’m an Oprah fan but it was funny)
      Anyway when I read the bible it said” the first in this world, shall be last in the next world,and the last in this world shall be first in the next world.”(glad I’m not Oprah)
      I also think that the big bang theory was stolen from the bible, and never gave the book any credit, because if anyone ever bothered to read Genesis, they would see that it says on the first day the earth was formless and desolate, and god commanded let there be light… and considering he didn’t make the sun moon and stars till the forth day, what was the light created on this day? sounds like a big bang to me!!!

    • Reg says:

      10:20pm | 13/12/10

      @ Empire…“Because my logic of believing in God is based partially on the fact that because evil exists( and it does and we all see it )then It makes sense that god exists, because evil would not be in existence without the obvious counterpart good.(my logic anyway)”

      I am rather disturbed that poor old Oprah has become a defining line between Good and Evil. If I was allowed to I’d exclaim, HOLY S***!  One thing that is clear, is that the line between good and evil shifts depending on the perception of the believer. Some with reason and others with practically none at all. That which is evil to a terrorist is good as far as we’re concerned. If we want rain and we have drought, some would regard that as evil, others of no opinion. I suggest there is nothing to suggest that God exists. Even Oprah is a passing fad and I have not the slightest doubt she knows it.

    • empire says:

      10:58am | 14/12/10

      @ Reg I wasn’t suggesting Oprah was evil, I was suggesting she was first.
      The evil I was referring to is murderers rapists pedophiles etc…
      If you don’t believe in God that’s fine, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I was simply saying that its weird that my reason for believing is the same as an atheists for not believing… And yes it was a bit off topic. Sorry about that!!!

    • Dinkim Davo says:

      10:29am | 13/12/10

      QUUIICCKK!! somebody start an Oprah Church! Brainwash a whole bunch of people have their hands up every week (like the photo) make it look like a weekly Hill$ong event!

    • Sal says:

      11:09am | 13/12/10

      “It’s a great philosophy if you are a comfortable middle-class citizen of the Western First World but it guarantees a miserable existence for anyone not so fortunate.”

      Exactly. I grew up around people who were into all of this psycho-babble. They’re still not content. They’re still endlessly seeking out the latest new- age guru or self-help fad that will finally make them happy. And they’re mostly middle-class or wealthy people with too much time on their hands. None of us are immune from the social systems and institutions that influence our lives for good or ill - class, gender, race, religion, culture, health, wealth, social power etc. ... To suggest that just ‘thinking positively’ is going to overcome all of those influences is naive and often deeply offensive. To give Oprah credit she does do more than simply contemplate her navel and generously devotes her time, energy and money to helping others. Perhaps that is ‘the secret’ right there.

    • Jack Bentley says:

      11:10am | 13/12/10

      A little reality check. John Howard would have been way too smart than to be seen on the same stage as Oprah Winfrey, or be seen to be endorsing the cult.

    • Seriously though says:

      12:51pm | 13/12/10

      Whenever Howard was in the states, he was too busy licking the ass of the texan to bother with Oprah.

    • Reg says:

      01:50pm | 13/12/10

      Then Jack you haven’t heard him on ~ Pick-a-Box or what-ever.  smile

      He endorses cricket and that’s as close a cult as I’ve ever seen.

    • Tegan says:

      11:16am | 13/12/10

      Well said Brett!! Although I do appreciate the drones of Oprah followers that will eventually come to visit our beautiful country and spend their dollars on our local economy! I remember wasting a good afternoon of my life reading “The Secrect”, secretly wishing I could get those few hours of my life back! I’ve had the priveledge of attending a conference you spoke at Brett. Keep up the good work!

    • Peter Mc says:

      11:26am | 13/12/10

      Whenever I have had the misfortune of running into Oprah, thru the media in general… It is always with a seeming undercurrent of unhappiness/sadness. Oprah would rarely actually appear to be happy? Am I missing something or is Oprah simply so insecure that she needs ridiculous levels of affirmation, just to keep her from an absolute emotional nadir. I feel sorry for Oprah and for the type of happiness she espouses. It is not my type of happiness (which is wholey subjective and maybe thaqt is my problem)

    • BK says:

      01:44pm | 13/12/10

      Most successful people are deeply unhappy and need, absolutely need success, so that they can feel ok about themselves. Marilyn Monroe is the best known example.

    • Duff says:

      11:32am | 13/12/10

      I think, for me, the positive thinking message is about the action you take in the face of life’s hurdles and finding the energy and motivation to move forward from a bad knock.  To use the sport analogy, you can use people like Oprah to ‘coach’ you to play your best, even when it seems you are losing the game.  If people like Oprah say “don’t give up, you can still win this if you try hard enough” you seem to be saying that that is wrong because it is not our fault the other team is bigger and stronger.  That’s wrong, i think, because (and I apologise for stretching the analogy to it’s limits) we all know it’s not whether you win or lose etc. but how you play the game.  Right?  But here’s the rub: you can’t really play your best unless you genuinely believe you have the ability to shape your future with your actions.

    • BK says:

      01:48pm | 13/12/10

      Most successful people have self-efficacy. They know what they are good at and what they aren’t. To continue the sports analogy, Cathy Freeman worked out that she wasn’t quite quick enough to win the more glamorous 100mtrs and not great at middle distance running either. She chose an event that uniquely suited her and this lead to her success.

    • Duff says:

      02:23pm | 13/12/10

      Good point.  But what about all the movies and stories we know where the hero triumphs in the face of adversity - overwhelming odds, in fact?  The story is that you’re better than you think you are, so don’t give up.  David and Goliath taught that even the smallest can take down the biggest with God’s help and faith.  Faith, perseverance, vision.  These are critical qualities to success.  Survivors have been shown to be the ones who maintain the ‘right’ attitude.  Who never give up.  How does this fit in with self efficacy?  Sometimes we don’t know our own abilities.

    • A Bob says:

      03:20pm | 13/12/10

      There’s an old joke about a guy who prays to God every night to win the lottery. His prayers become more and more anguished, asking if he’s done something wrong to not deserve Gods blessing. this goes on every night for months when God finally answers, ‘Give me a break will you? Buy a damn ticket!”

      Success will always elude us if we never buy a ticket, but there are still thousands who buy tickets and never win. Meaning they persevere, keep their faith but die alone with nothing. I’ve seen it happen more than once.

      For most of us though who live between the extremes, it’s a matter of balance. Like the occasional drink, a little bit of self delusion is not always harmful. It can take the edge off our existential angst and open the door to opportunity. But all things in moderation and don’t become an addict.

    • Old Bert says:

      11:37am | 13/12/10

      Can O-praaaaah help me?  I doubt it.  I need to have the shortcut to happiness. It’s my fault. It’s been that way most of my miserable life, since I left my bike on the mud flats at low tide, never to be seen again, whilst oystering, unaware of the rising tide. Nothing has gone right since.  Now, It’s a matter of time. I’m 80. I can never get that bike back; and I’ve accepted that. Unable to complete the quiz;  I forgot the question, after carefully thinking about the correct answer. There’s little hope. I still need to awaken the joy in my life. That’s easy. Wake up, followed quickly by breathing.  I will probably be accused of being bitter, cynical, negative, and many other colourful things, and that’s ok. It’s my right. I can cope.The law of attraction doesn’t apply to me, of all people. I bought it on myself. It’s the bike.

    • Reg says:

      02:00pm | 13/12/10

      No it’s not, it’s the curse of being a faux-liberal supporter yer sill old bastard.. Karma. smile

    • dave says:

      12:14pm | 13/12/10

      “We help them by recognising that positive thinking can’t help them but we can.”

      The help Mr Rutledge is suggesting was preceded by a positive thought. Positive thinking has helped him to create a better world. He has attracted happy outcomes to those he has helped and has attracted to himself a feeling of worth and contribution to society.

      Brett Rutledge is a perfect example of the power positive thinking and the laws of attraction.

    • A Bob says:

      02:05pm | 13/12/10

      My horoscope said the sun whould shine today. Wow! Astrology works!

      One example does not prove anything. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. etc, etc, etc…

    • dave says:

      03:31pm | 13/12/10

      Hi A Bob,

      Action is preceded by thought. If you think a positive thought and then act on it in a positive way, you too are harnessing the power of positive thinking. Thought leads to action - it’s unavoidable.

      In the case of your reply - you had a thought about my opinion, which led to the wording you chose for your post. Now you will attract to you a result stemming from your thoughts and actions.

    • A Bob says:

      05:40pm | 13/12/10

      Thanks, Dave. Giving people an example of the sort of thinking behind the quackery being discussed here demonstrates it better than any attempt at describing it.

    • AntiOprah says:

      02:33pm | 13/12/10

      I agree with Brett that the Oprah following is cult-like. You can put that in the same basket along with Scientology and the Branch Davidian….

      Surely there are more important events happening in this world than Oprah swanning around down under??

    • sandra nelson says:

      06:38pm | 13/12/10

      oprah retires at the end of 2011.
      oprah is just on long service leave in australia.
      like the sydney olympics, oprah will bring nobody and nothing to Australia.

    • sandra nelson says:

      06:38pm | 13/12/10

      is oprah good in bed?

    • stephen says:

      09:31pm | 13/12/10

      Ask the Editor of The Sydney Morning Herald.
      He knows everything.

    • Happy Dude says:

      06:39pm | 13/12/10

      Sounds like everyone here could do with some positive thinking!

      Cult-like is a huge generalisation and way off the mark, in my opinion. Steve Jobs is a cult leader. Oprah is not. Cults are about there only being one way - their way. Oprah is preaching a very different message.

      And the most important message is think happy, be happy, and what’s wrong with that? I’d be living that even without my supreme queen and overlord.

      Trust me - the Big O and happiness go hand in hand. And sometimes hand in lots of other places too!

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      07:25pm | 13/12/10

      Let’s see, Steve Jobs brought us the iPod, iPad and iPhone (all relatively useful items). Oprah brought us a crappy talk show and a book of the month club. I’ll take Steve Jobs thanks.

    • Happy Dude says:

      08:30pm | 13/12/10

      Think about what Steve Jobs doesn’t want you to have rather than what he does. Tell me what has Oprah ever stopped anyone from doing. Well - she’s allowed a lot of people to stop thinking for themselves, but would she stop you if you did? iDontthinkso (TM Steve Jobs, patent pending)

    • Charles Kelly says:

      08:21pm | 13/12/10

      This whole pathetic little love fest can be summed up in two words - blissful ignorance.

    • the inhabitant says:

      10:56pm | 13/12/10

      There is nothing wrong with positive thinking and feeling inspired. It simply has to be tempered with realism and the knowledge that not all things will succeed, for a multitude of reasons. But without positive thinking, nothing would get done and everyone would be depressed, or simply robots.
      Positive thinking is a good start, but it isn’t all the story.
      If you simply believe blindly that all will work out as you dream it to, well that’s foolish of course.
      Then again, unless you dream it first and then take action to create the dream, it probably isn’t going to happen at all.
      Many people need someone to inspire them that things are possible, as they are brought up without that kind of positivism. Perhaps Oprah gives that, a vaulable gift.

    • cRook says:

      08:58pm | 14/12/10

      My mother bought The Secret. She thought it would help her get out of financial difficulty. Unfortunately, thinking positive thoughts did not stop her shopping, and she is now bankrupt.
      From another side, my ex told me that my only problem was that I was negative and all I had to do to be better was to think positive thoughts. I replied that I was sick, tired, and broke and it would be nice if he could get a job, clean up after himself and help with the kids. Strangely enough, I thought lots of positive thoughts after I kicked him out, and I did feel much better.

    • simon says:

      01:49pm | 04/01/11

      It’s funny that Brett expresses concern about American influence on Australia, but uses the American spelling of ‘summarise’ in the fifth paragraph…

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter