There are many ways to describe the gluttony that comes with lopsided result after lopsided result at the ICC World Cup. Pages upon pages around the world are being cranked out as we speak, by those cynical types who don’t quite see the romance in Sri Lanka annihilating Canada, or New Zealand treating the Kenyans like Whangarei park cricketers.

We're going to call this contraption a RICKYshaw. Pic: AP.

Tonight, just to make things really interesting, England takes on The Netherlands. So here’s the shortest summation of the tournament you’re likely to read. It needs just six words. Ready? Here goes.

I’m thinking of watching Ben Elton.

And this is cricket’s showpiece.

The World Cup is the sport’s most visible event. Fittingly it’s also its most enduring example of greed and corporate largesse. The sad thing is it doesn’t have to be this way.

In order to squeeze every possible drop of the TV rights lemon, the ICC packs the tournament with nations that wouldn’t know a cricket bat from a lightsaber. More games equal more dollars.

Sure, it’s common knowledge the ICC cares only for the mighty buck, however this highly paid and pampered horde can’t even summon the subtlety or dynamism to create a cash cow which captures the imagination, even briefly.

Think of the possibilities. We could have an eight team elite-only tournament where each team plays the other once. Or Twice. The result would be plenty of games, lots of quality. Have a system where only the top four teams make it to the next stage. The cut and thrust of must-win preliminary matches would be intoxicating.

What about a best-of three final? Best-of-three semis? Translation: the potential is endless. There are many ways to skin a cat, yet the ICC chooses to use a machete.

Thankfully one atrocity has been removed from previous tournaments - the ‘Super’ stage. Attempting to explain that mathematical maze would require a thesis by the main character from Good Will Hunting, but here’s a hint: If you’re inventing a system which hasn’t been used in centuries of organised sport, chances are there’s a good reason it hasn’t been used.

So the ICC gets rid of it. Comes up with another system. Somehow it’s worse.

The knock out quarter final format is simple enough to follow, but that means eight teams progress to the next stage. Take out Bangladesh, Zimbabwe and the other wretched teams and what do we have left to fill those eight places? Eight bona-fide cricket nations.

So here’s the reality: To make the next stage, Australia’s only meaningful games are against Canada, Kenya , as well as the earlier mauling of Zimbabwe. That’s it. Win those and they’re through. The other matches simply won’t matter.

Four weeks and forty-two meaningless games. Just to reach the inevitable. Are you subscribing to Foxtel yet?

The World Cup is also known as the shrine of cricket corruption. Fifteen years ago Pakistan’s loss to Kenya was Cricket’s greatest Cinderella story. At least for the few hours before the rumours sprawled. Then the 1999 final between Pakistan and Australia - the final for heaven sakes - was shrouded in a cloud of incompetence and suspicion.

However the authorities have come up with a way to end the scourge. Stop it dead in its tracks. It’s banning the use of Twitter during matches.

Perhaps this columnist is sceptical. Perhaps stopping Twitter really will solve the problem. A better authority could probably give a more educated view. Perhaps disgraced match-fixer Pakistan captain Salman Butt can share his opinion on the subject when he’s in the commentary box.

And this is cricket’s showpiece.

Most commented

32 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Jugg says:

      11:37am | 22/02/11

      The lesser cricketing nations should start the tournament a week earlier.  It’s a round robin format.  Top two finishing teams then join the major cricketing nations the following week to compete for the World Cup.

    • Daniel says:

      10:32pm | 22/02/11

      I had the same thought, as it stands it takes way to long.

    • TheRealDave says:

      11:40am | 22/02/11

      I love seeing the cricket minnows at World Cup time. Its the only time we actually get to see them. Many cricket fans wouldn’t even know half those countries actually play cricket if they didn’t see them at the world cup.

      Most of all, the coverage their cricketers get in their home country from being at and playing in the world cup can only help improve the profile of the game in their country. So what’s wrong with that?? We should see more of it. Lets get the Kenyans and the Dutch out here to take on an Australia A side on off game days during the regular Australia vs Top Class side competition is on. Constant play can only help strengthen these minnows into stronger cricketing nations in the future and better world cups in the future.

    • Shifter says:

      11:45am | 22/02/11

      And that’s why they’ve kicked the minnow nations out for the next planned tournament.

      Problem Solvered.

    • Shane says:

      12:06pm | 22/02/11

      Yeah, the problem of expanding the game. Shocking business, that. Obviously the Gods of Australian cricket shouldn’t be subjected to the boredom of having to face Canada, Ireland or The Netherlands.

      What a cocky decision to cut the minnows. It’s called a WORLD Cup. Cricket simply isnt big enough (in enough countries) to warrant a qualification process like FIFA has, so they have to make do with what they have - fewer than one dozen serious nations and handful of part-timers. In reality there are only a handful of sports big enough (i.e. A major sport in enough nations, to stop you quoting Indian participation stats) to warrant a qualification system: Football, basketball, tennis, athletics, swimming… that’s about it. Golf (If you count it).

    • Shifter says:

      01:07pm | 22/02/11

      I suppose the real question is, do enough people from the minnow nations care that they are playing Australia, India, New Zealand even, and getting absolutely pasted?

      I’m not sure it’d do much for me to hear that my country was beaten by the Kiwis in 8 overs.

      As a comparison, the ice hockey World Cup and Olympic tournaments generally run on a format where the minnow tier 1 nations compete in a round robin format and the top 2 move to play with the 6 big nations in the remainder of the tournament.

      Development has it’s place, but when it causes hugely lop-sided results, exactly how worthwhile is it?

    • AFR says:

      11:55am | 22/02/11

      The tournament should be includive rather than exclusive (up to point of course). I think 14 is about right, as some of the “minnows” have actually had to qualify to get there.

      What next? Only premier league sides can play in the FA Cup?

    • Vaunted says:

      12:53pm | 22/02/11

      What’s the FA Cup?

    • Vaunted says:

      12:10pm | 22/02/11

      The cup should always be played in the West Indies, that way visitors can go to the beach or a Rasta party when the cricket gets too dull.

    • rufus says:

      12:11pm | 22/02/11

      Didn’t Holland or another minnow once beat England or one of the ‘giants’?

      C’mon, it’s cricket, a sport played seriously in only a handful of nations, and a ‘world cup’ is a joke by definition, as it is in the rugby codes.

      Don’t have pay TV. Will miss the world cup, but won’t miss it.

      But then, these sports are big in Australia because they, along with AFL - played nowhere else - are the sports where Australians get false pride vicariously through the relative success of the national team.

    • Jugg says:

      12:23pm | 22/02/11

      Soccer doesn’t have the following here because it is so boring.

    • Markus says:

      12:55pm | 22/02/11

      What is such a joke about the Rugby World Cup?
      In the 6 tournaments to date there have been 4 different winners.

      Statistically the FIFA World Cup is the bigger sham - 19 World Cups, only 8 winners. And even more one-sided than that in the last 50 years.

    • rufus says:

      01:07pm | 22/02/11

      Apparently, then, Jugg, Australians find the world’s most popular sport by far ‘boring’. Or is it just that we are not in the top ten at it? How else do you explain that the biggest junior sport in Australia doesn’t translate to crowds and viewers at the senior level?

    • SM says:

      01:37pm | 22/02/11

      how does a “national team” have “relative success” in a sport where Australia is the only country who plays?

      there would be no national team nor any “relative success” as we’d have no-one to play or enjoy “relative success” against

      silly soccer gibberish

    • Markus says:

      01:43pm | 22/02/11

      @rufus, because it is cheap to play and parents want their kids to play it because they did in the old country, or because they see it as a safer sport for their darling children.

      It doesn’t translate to crowds and viewers at the senior level because of the aforementioned ‘boring’.

    • Fingers says:

      12:14pm | 22/02/11

      I guess millions of people around the ‘football’ world feel the same when the likes of Australia qualify for the Soccer World Cup. Yet we have performed admirably well in the past two soccer world cups and our domestic soccer (Sorry to the righteous out there - it’s what I’ve always grown up knowing it to be called) has flourished as a result.

      Kenya made the semi finals of the cricket world cup in 2003 and have improved their cricket structures and play since. Sure, they’re no world champions - but if they’ve made the semi finals only a few years ago, they deserve to be in the main tournament group. And if they can do it, others such as Zimbabwe shoud dare to dream of the same.

      And whilst the Eight Team Elite Tournament you suggest has merit - it is a world cup and as such all countries who play the game should be allowed to qualify and play if they do so.

    • Harquebus says:

      12:16pm | 22/02/11

      Spectator sport is for the emotional stimulation of brain dead morons. Ben who?

    • Markus says:

      12:27pm | 22/02/11

      I disagree. For me, and this is the same with the Rugby World Cup especially, watching the minnows in action is quite exciting.
      Being mostly amateur players, they wear their heart on their sleeves on every play, and appear to appreciate the magnitude of the event a lot more than the teams who are there every time.

      While admittedly the results between a top level side and a minnow side are extremely one-sided, there is something extremely satisfying about watching a Dutch or Irish player tonk someone like James Anderson for six, or getting a good slips catch against a world-champion like Tendulkar.

      Plus lets not forget how great it was watching Ireland beat Pakistan!

    • Jim says:

      12:49pm | 22/02/11

      ...and if the soccer governing body decides to kick the minnows out of their world cup, where would Australia stand?

    • Steve says:

      01:55pm | 22/02/11

      Who won the last time these two teams met in a World Cup?

      Ah yes, The Netherlands (in the last 20/20 World Cup).

      Stick to writing about your specialty sport, Dan.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      04:28pm | 22/02/11

      My bad. I chucked that line in.

    • Budz says:

      02:12pm | 22/02/11

      Ahh so you are the guy of The Grill Team.

      I think the question that has to be asked is if playing in the world cup actually helping countries like Kenya, Canada and the Netherlands develop the local players and structures in place?

    • mary monica roche says:

      03:09pm | 22/02/11

      Your comment:
      too much cricket is never enough.

    • Stewart Henstock says:

      04:17pm | 22/02/11

      If they decide to remove the minnow countries i hope they remove England first.

    • Bob James says:

      07:02pm | 22/02/11

      Maybe they should ditch the Ashes series too? Or just wait until Aus can compete again?

    • C1 says:

      08:23pm | 22/02/11

      Guys,

      I do not think Australia should rest on its laurels. Clarke’s comments regarding their pasting against -  India and Sth Africa(top nations) was they were just practice matches-simply preparation for the real game against Zimbabwe.

      We may cruise into the finals, but we are going to be in for a shock.

    • Amit says:

      09:50pm | 22/02/11

      What a bunch of cry babies! Who died and made you the boss of deciding how things should be done? If new things were not tried, the “white” folks would still be in England. Cricket would have never moved out of Cambridge and Oxford. Maybe the only format of cricket that we would have known is the 5 day match. the people who have to do things are doing it. They are trying to make things interesting for everyone giving all a level playing field. I strongly object to the notion of “minnows” and “Giants”. If anything, this smacks of narcissism of gigantic proportions. Who should be playing in the world cup? the Aussies? The Indians just beat them black and blue… The Pakistanis? Their mere presence ensures that there would be some “malpractice” like ball tampering or match fixing. The “minnows”: Kenya, Netherlands, et al have already been lambasted enough. England? Really? When was the last time they ever won a series? West Indies? have they ever been the same after Viv Richards?? I’m sorry I have said so much for people who will not get their heads out of their other orifices to see the world around them. I might as well have been talking to the willow bat…

    • Gerard says:

      10:36pm | 22/02/11

      Today Tonight-standard rubbish. Does the author actually know anything about cricket?

      The World Cup is cricket’s “most enduring example of greed and corporate largesse”? Try the Champions Trophy ( I would have said the IPL, but I don’t consider it to be a cricket tournament in any sense).

      The call for an eight team elite-only tournament is perplexing. Why call it a World Cup if you’re only going to have the same teams who play each other all the time anyway? More to the point, who’s going to play? India, Sri Lanka and South Africa are the only teams at the moment that could be described as ‘elite’. England are an embarrassment, Australia, West Indies and New Zealand aren’t much better; Pakistani cricket has always been a farce, even when the team is playing well.

      What really nails this article as tabloid rubbish, though, is its discussion of match fixing. Could the author please name the venue at which Pakistan were defeated by Kenya in the 96 World Cup? No idea? That’s because these two teams didn’t play each other. Not content with getting his facts wrong, the author goes on to imply that the West Indian players (the team which actually did lose to Kenya) were suspected of throwing the match. I certainly don’t remember any such suggestions at the time (particularly given that West Indies were already struggling in the tournament), and there is no evidence that any of the players have ever been involved in match fixing offences. Absolutely pathetic.

    • Dan Ginnane says:

      06:32am | 23/02/11

      Thank’s for your response Gerard, you are correct I indeed got my upsets mixed up and intended to refer to Pakistan v Bangladesh in 1999, which I’m sure you are aware resulted in an inquiry. The Pakistani’s were eventually cleared, however the inquiry was clouded by the fact it was conducted by the Pakistan Cricket Board.

      The last two editions of the ICC Champions Trophy were streamlined to eight teams, with the 2009 tournament completed in less than two weeks. I believe this hardly compares with the six week monotony of the World Cup

    • Mark says:

      10:55am | 23/02/11

      I’m sure James Anderson will wake up today wishing England didn’t have to play the Netherlands either, ha!

    • AFR says:

      06:27pm | 23/02/11

      +1.

      Sure, England won by an ok margin, but Holland put 292 on them, and England only won with 1.5 overs to spare.

      I see the star for theDutch was a Suf Afrikan born player, Van der van-something. They must wish all those born in SA were available (Pieterson, Strauss, Trott, etc)

    • The Original Oz says:

      01:32pm | 23/02/11

      What is this Cricket you are talking about? and why would anyone of sound mind want to watch it?  But seriously, with all the rain recently I have grass in my backyard that is growing faster than the average pace of a cricket game - and it is far more interesting to watch

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Just saw the Waratahs result. Can someone tell me how hard the kick was for the Tahs to win? #SuperRugby

Daniel Piotrowski

@SquigglyRick likewise!

Daniel Piotrowski

Hurray racism is fixed no protesters at anti-Islam demonstration http://t.co/hRFbZq8u9h

ToryShepherd

OI TWITTER! Need your best misheard lyrics pronto for @891adelaide's #thebuzz! Hit me, please!

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter