As Kevin Rudd’s approval ratings slide in the polls many Australians are growing disillusioned with the Prime Minister and sceptical about his promises.

He never made it off the first step. Cartoon: Warren Brown

In a survey The Punch conducted in Sydney city last week testing public opinion of Kevin Rudd, many respondents dismissed him as “a typical politician.”

Respondents were asked to describe the Prime Minister in three words. Some of the descriptions offered have long been used to characterise him: “bland”, “boring”, and “intelligent”.

Others were surprising, but in their own way, spot on. Luke, 31, from Ryde, said he was like the “Milky Bar kid.” Kevin Rudd reminded Amelia, 19, from Surry Hills of a “big marshmallow man.”

But Tracey, 48, from Razorback summed up the views of many people who had grown disappointed with Kevin Rudd. Her three words to describe the Prime Minister were: “unfortunately becoming typical.”

Labor and Greens voters held this view most commonly.

Many were disappointed by Kevin Rudd’s decision to shelve the emissions trading scheme until 2013. But many respondents also said that climate change was not an issue that would sway their vote in this year’s federal election.

Chloe, 27, from Paddington, said she wasn’t bothered when the federal government shelved the ETS: “I don’t care. I care that [Kevin Rudd] said he’d do it, but backflipped on it. But I didn’t vote on it.”

She went on to describe Kevin Rudd as: “Ineffective. Weak. Populist.” She was planning to change her vote from Labor to the Liberal party in this year’s federal election.

Many respondents didn’t buy Kevin Rudd’s message that he shelved the ETS partly in response to the lack of international consensus on climate change action.

“He’s only doing it to protect his electoral prospects,” said Richard, 61, of Waitara.

Nicki, 40, from Vaucluse said: “It was political, tactical. But I’m not overly worried by it.”

Bryce, 38, of Rose Bay was more disappointed: “The man has no backbone. A complete lack of conviction.”

Asked what Kevin Rudd has done well since he was elected Prime Minister, many respondents cited decisions he made early in his term. His apology to Aborigines and the stolen generations in 2008 and his response to the global financial crisis were his most popular actions.

But some people believed his apology was meaningless: “It was only symbolic. [Aborigines are] still struggling as far as I’m aware. Words and just words,” said John, 56, from Leichhardt.

Ashley, 36 of Thornleigh said the apology in 2008 was an important symbolic gesture. “But it was not backed up with action. [Kevin Rudd] tends to go for symbolism rather than action.”

Many respondents had raised their hopes when Kevin Rudd became Prime Minister. Some had looked forward to action to help prevent climate change, and equality for same-sex couples. Now they felt let down on both.

The high expectations voters initially had for Kevin Rudd explain the disappointment many are now feeling with him, said Mike, 30, from Glebe. He said voters hoped for too much after the 2007 federal election and that it was inevitable they’d be let down on so many fronts.

“It’s like Obama. You expected a lot coming into the first term after the Howard years,” he said.

More than any policy or message the Prime Minister had, it was his manner that irritated many people. Kevin Rudd’s well-known mannerisms were beginning to grate on some respondents.

“I don’t like the way he speaks. I hate the way he keeps on using these Ruddisms like, ‘You know what?’ and ‘I tell you one thing!’” said Chris, 61, from Blaxland.

Julie, age withheld, from Darlinghurst agreed. “If he utters one more time ‘And you know something’, I might change my vote. It’s such a position of arrogance.”

Asked to describe Kevin Rudd in three words, Pat, 35, of Helensburgh offered two: “Working families.” He said the Prime Minister uses the phrase so much that he can’t help thinking of it when describing Kevin Rudd.

Mark, 49, from Rose Bay, said: “I don’t like his style. I voted for him, but I think he’s a hard man to like.”

Liberal voters were more likely to describe him as vain and egotistical.

“He’s trying to leave his own mark for his own vanity. He has all these big schemes,” said Luke, 31 of Ryde.

Most striking was that the people The Punch spoke to often found it difficult to describe Kevin Rudd.

The descriptions people gave of the Prime Minister often contradicted those given by others. Respondents gave opposite views on many points of Kevin Rudd’s personality: for some he was “boring” and “humble”, and for others he was “charismatic” and “egotistical”.

Some saw him as “sincere”, others as “deceptive”. He was both “down to earth” and a “dreamer” for Deborah, 46, from Darlinghurst. Toby, 32, of Leichhardt said he was both “funny” and “serious.”

Robert, 39, of St Ives said he was undecided about who he’d vote for this year. His description of Kevin Rudd was careful and considered: “Unknown. Unpredictable.”

Most commented

62 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Gary Cox says:

      07:14am | 24/05/10

      Intelligent? What was that person smoking?

    • Ian says:

      08:08am | 24/05/10

      Deceptive, Vain, Arrogant.

    • Matt says:

      08:16am | 24/05/10

      Useless, bureaucratic, megalomaniac.

    • John A Neve says:

      08:24am | 24/05/10

      “Many were disappointed” and I can see why. Based on this article many voters saw Rudd and the Labor government as the second coming!!

      Sadly neither Rudd or the Labor government are divine.  If peope want any government to do more and provide more, then tax in some form will have to increase. If people want to cut back on migration, then we have to get the unemployed working.

      Governments of all persuasions are, in a democracy, a reflection of the electorate, sad really is’nt it?

    • dovif says:

      09:17am | 24/05/10

      Unfortunitely for Kevin Rudd, it was Kevin who set the bar so high for himself, he wanted to be everything to everyone. He cared about the grocery prices, the fuel prices, he wanted to be an economic conservative, he wan’t to promise about climate change,.

      He wanted to be everything that was vote winning. when some of those goals eventually collide (ie ETS and economy) he backflipped, and he end up standing for nothing, this was always going to happen. Rudd overpromised and underdelivered by a significant margin

    • Mayor Quimby says:

      09:41am | 24/05/10

      Voters will never be happy because they expect the impossible.

      They want more roads but don’t want to pay for them nor do they want the roads if it will negatively affect them.

      They want more and cheaper houses but not if it makes the value of their house to drop or if it means high-rises in their area

      They want cheap electricity but not if it means building something in their area or an increase in their rates

      They want cheap and clean water but not if it means building something in their area or an increase in their rates

      They want better schools but not if it means rating schools or paying mroe taxes.

      They want no unemployment and no inflation and interest rates to stay low

      They want cheap groceries of high quality but continue to build new home estates on arable farming land because they want cheap houses with lots of roads but no high-rises and busy roads in their areas

      They want high speed internet but not if they have to pay for it

      They want cheap petrol to drive their big cars but don’t like the pollution

      They want the government to stimulate the economy to prevent a recession but don’t want a budget deficit

      They want budget surpluses but continue to want the governemnt to pay for goods and services and infrastructure and schools and hospitals and sporting grounds and welfare and aid and baby bonuses and Family Tax Benefit A+B and fuel grants and…..

    • Darryl Price says:

      08:28am | 24/05/10

      Self absorbed, philosophical, disconnected.

    • acotrel says:

      08:29am | 24/05/10

      Rudd demonstrated his intelligence when he walked away from the ETS.  When Abbott described the complex issue as ‘a great big new tax on everything’, he effectively stifled the debate, in an irresponsible and reckless manner!

    • Andrew says:

      11:34am | 24/05/10

      Oh yes, it’s the big bad oppositions fault that Rudd is a liar. Could’ve called a DD election, threatened it, didn’t do it, ran away and blamed everyone else ... coward.

    • TC says:

      09:33pm | 24/05/10

      Which part of “a great big new tax on everything” is not true?

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:31am | 24/05/10

      Dissapointing beyond belief

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:32am | 24/05/10

      Useless as usual

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      08:35am | 24/05/10

      Ear wax eater.

    • julie says:

      09:36am | 24/05/10

      ear waxing lyrical

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      12:41pm | 24/05/10

      Julie , right on !  ha ha ha ha haw haw haw heh heh heh .  Love it !

    • luke09 says:

      12:45pm | 24/05/10

      Hasn’t Rudd denied eating earwax, even with the video footage showing he did? What an honest trustworthy politician he is.

    • Mr Food says:

      08:52am | 24/05/10

      The above cartoon is spot on. K Rudd is the worst PM in Australian history! Can’t wait for a good biography on him; he has tanished his own legacy.

    • TC says:

      09:35pm | 24/05/10

      The Great Election Day Kerfuffle?

    • TerryofBrisbane says:

      08:59am | 24/05/10

      Your comment:
      Two ways to describe Rudd:

      “All sizzle - no sausage”
      “All floss - no fairy”

    • Daniel says:

      09:05am | 24/05/10

      If voters are let down they need to vote Greens next time.

    • Andrew says:

      11:37am | 24/05/10

      OhhK… If we feel let down lets all vote for a party that opposes everything. Greens credibility is shot after their recent Tasmanian folly. If the greens had their way we’d all be living in caves. Yabba Dabba Doo!

    • Nigel Catchlove says:

      12:27pm | 24/05/10

      ... then they’ll REALLY understand being let down.

    • Markus says:

      12:37pm | 24/05/10

      Learned my lesson there in local elections, as did many others.
      Greens ended up with about 25% of seats, enough to easily hold the deciding vote over anything Labor or Liberal proposed, but still handed the power straight over to an inept Labor government without a fight.

    • Beagle says:

      01:08pm | 24/05/10

      Andrew is we want to vote for a party that opposes everything, we would vote liberal.
      The greens just have a higher standards that the other parties.

    • Andrew says:

      01:27pm | 24/05/10

      Dog of a comment beagle. You don’t do sarcasm very well. But I’m happy to be convinced, name me 10 policies over the last ten years that the greens have supported federally.

      Oh and by the way, you are aware that more than 80% of this governments bills have gone through the senate unopposed. What! You didn’t know that? How embarassing!

    • Beagle says:

      02:00pm | 24/05/10

      Sorry Andrew
      I make it a policy not to argue with liberal staffers.

    • Andrew says:

      04:12pm | 24/05/10

      Wow! Call the press, the Greens have finally got a policy!

    • dovif says:

      09:20am | 24/05/10

      Incompetant, Arrogant and useless

    • stephen says:

      09:24am | 24/05/10

      Pragmatic, thoughtful, disorganized. (a little).

    • Barry says:

      10:06am | 24/05/10

      funny, not as in haha, as in peculiar!

    • Saskia says:

      10:31am | 24/05/10

      Sly, creepy, narcissist

    • casba says:

      10:32am | 24/05/10

      Doctor Death-Queensland.

    • Anjuli says:

      10:33am | 24/05/10

      He isn’t even intelligent if he was then he would have let him ministers handle their portfolios instead of being a control freak. What he hasn’t got is a good dose of common sense.

    • PC says:

      10:52am | 24/05/10

      Napoleonic, Phoney, Nanny

    • Sam Chowder says:

      11:24am | 24/05/10

      Promoted beyond ability

    • Andrew says:

      11:43am | 24/05/10

      I know whenever you mention any of the great dictators in history (Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao, Hitler etc) you instantly lose credibility but I think K Rudd would have been comfortable in those regimes. I think he has a public propaganda persona and a private mid left wing agenda and harsh personality that he assiduously hides from the general public. I think he has convinced a load of left leaning journo’s that he is the messiah.

      I could just see him sitting behind a desk with a clipboard ticking off peoples names for re-education etc with a firm moral belief that it was for their own good.

      Because of that I believe we all dislike his self improtance, his apparent ability to tell us all what’s good for us.

      He is getting found out, some of the people all of the time but not all of the people .....

    • JulieE says:

      12:03pm | 24/05/10

      Self-centred, soft-centred, vote-centred

    • Brian says:

      03:35pm | 24/05/10

      good post Julie lol

    • Marie says:

      12:16pm | 24/05/10

      Just another very ordinary politician. Not a leader.

    • Jane says:

      12:22pm | 24/05/10

      Spinesless, Gutless, Poll-Driven

    • Louisa says:

      12:36pm | 24/05/10

      Woeful.  Untrustworthy. Ugly

    • Larry says:

      12:38pm | 24/05/10

      showpony, self congratulatory, arrogant

    • Joe says:

      12:46pm | 24/05/10

      Its is unfortunate when the people who were sucked in by the “cool” politics of Kevin07 and are now disillusioned, but instead of turning on Rudd just go back to apathy. “Oh well he is just a politician. No one is any better. I always thought politics was crap…”

      Its a pity they don’t do something about it, or actually see that not all politicians are as useless or spin driven as Rudd… After awakening many younger voters and getting their hopes up, Rudd is giving politicians a bad name.

    • Beagle says:

      01:11pm | 24/05/10

      What do you expect from News Ltd.? A fair and balanced article?
      Just focus on the negatives ...
      tools

    • demeter says:

      01:13pm | 24/05/10

      Let not undermine the massive and brave step Rudd took in saying sorry, tot he stolen generation the previous government took the easy line and refused to admit the problem was Australias. Only a brave and determined PM could have done such a thing.

    • Dingo says:

      01:26pm | 24/05/10

      And at the time demeter, he promised it would never happen again, but it is still happening today.

      Just empty words.

    • Andrew says:

      01:35pm | 24/05/10

      And what effect did that have?

      No one is questioning Rudd’s ability to make announcements or grandiose statements. He’s great at them. But what do they do in effect?

      Has his government improved indigenous health, education or living standards? The resounding answer is no.

      I agree, the whole “i’m sorry” thing was handled very porrly by John Howard but if you’re talking about moral fortitude and improving the lives of indigenous Australians you need look no further than the intervention engineered by the likeable and highly respected Mal Brough. That intervention was approved and supported by Howard. You might also like to look at what Abbott has tried to do for indigenous communities.

      All of the above is a perfect example of the difference between action politics and spin. Rudd is a construct of spin and now everyone is coming to see that.

    • AC says:

      01:42pm | 24/05/10

      It is easy for a man with no principles to say anything. Doesn’t make him brave or determined - he had nothing to lose.

    • dovif says:

      01:44pm | 24/05/10

      demeter

      whatever would buy him votes, people are easily fooled

      Just see fuel watch, grocery watch, ETS

      If he think saying sorry to the Pakistan cricket team will buy him votes he would

      He is the politician about nothing

    • persephone says:

      02:21pm | 24/05/10

      Dingo

      don’t be silly. There is a world of difference between taking children away from their parents as a matter of policy and removing children when there is clear evidence of danger.

    • demeter says:

      04:20pm | 24/05/10

      Come on Dingo, let get real about this. What Rudd said was really only his desire to stop the continuing abuse of Aboriginal Children. No one really thought it would stop. But it is mearly an aim, you cannot expect to hold pollies responsible for some thing that is clearly out of thier responsibilty.  The ALP have shown great commitment to protecting the Aboriginal cultural identity in Australia far more than the racist policies of the Liberal party.

    • Dingo says:

      11:51am | 25/05/10

      persephone, I didn’t say it was good or bad, just that Rudd promised it would NEVER happen again.

      dementer, he didn’t say abuse would never happen again, he said the government would not remove Aboriginal children from their families ever again. Rudd’s words, not mine.

    • Michael says:

      01:27pm | 24/05/10

      pudding, mashed potato, porridge

    • MatLon says:

      01:36pm | 24/05/10

      Extremist civil libertarian.

      Sexual assault libertarian.

      ...oh wait, that is how Kevin described me when I said the filter wont work.

    • Against the Man says:

      02:33pm | 24/05/10

      ‘.....often found it difficult to describe Kevin Rudd.’ The following quote from the article brings a smile to my face. Of course it is hard to describe a man that stands for everything and nothing at the same time….I think. Rudd justs wants the glory but isn’t willing to work hard. C’mon people time for change, time to send this millionaire PM and his labor mates a message of how we won’t put up with incompetence.

    • TheRealDave says:

      03:18pm | 24/05/10

      Maybe we should block the IP’s of registered members of political parties - of BOTH sides - from posting in public forums as if they are just your average punter.

      Or at least identify them as such.

      Maybe a cowbell alarm ala John Laws whenever you read one of their ‘unbiased’ and ‘unsolicited’ comments…..

    • Brian says:

      03:29pm | 24/05/10

      Three words? A OBAMA WANNA-BE

    • Bob H says:

      03:43pm | 24/05/10

      Is he really the best we can do - oh dear

    • Rudd is a Dud says:

      05:19pm | 24/05/10

      If Rudd is the best we can do then our children are doomed. He has already sold off our houses and land to foreigners and left true blue Australians out in the cold. Well done Mr PM!

    • Ben F says:

      09:46pm | 24/05/10

      An interesting thought though -  who was better, or should I say, who was worse - Kevin Rudd or John Howard?

    • Bob H says:

      11:02pm | 24/05/10

      I’ve started to miss old John - did I really just say that - Mudd must be bad

    • ray g says:

      03:43pm | 25/05/10

      He changes what he stands for like the weather - fundamental, core , number one challenge, all Tony Abbot needs to do is connect and this dudd will be on his way - come on Tony PLEEEEEESE!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@Drag0nista Can't see it bring re l 'ship Cos lots of Ruddites don't back gay marriage (Joel, Bowen) and lot of Gillardians do.

Malcolm Farr

KRudd gives marriage equality folk hope, but odds still against it passing on June 6. http://t.co/QmQffMkSvH

Malcolm Farr

ACL says gay marriage would lead to gay sex (how to do it) being taught in schools. You really haver to credit them with vivid imagination.

ToryShepherd

Welcome to your wombiverse. On orgasmic births and being so happy you could cry http://t.co/7JrbQSCV6j

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter