IN the dying minutes of the first AFL semi-final, it appeared the Magpies would crash and burn … falling victim to another attack of the Colliwobbles.

Pies cheer squad leader Joffa and friends pensive before the comeback.

But for some fateful reason, Magpie full-forward John Anthony steadied and threaded a major when it counted the most. The Crows must have felt like they were feathered and tarred.

Anthony’s heroics saved the Magpies from an agonising aftermath. It wouldn’t be much fun to cop a deathly stare from coach Mick Malthouse. If anyone has seen Malthouse’s face in the rooms after a loss, you would feel for the players.

Setting such vigorous standards, as Malthouse does, helps produce results on the footy field. Players with a sense of fear are often fuelled with a motivation to lift under pressure.

No one likes to look like a dill – especially the Magpies, who are full of pride.

Last week on The Punch, I reported that Western Bulldogs coach Rodney Eade said his team would win the 2nd sem-final.  Eade was right. The Doggies smashed the Lions, showing their depth and character to cope under finals’ pressure.

So the Victorian clubs have reined supreme this finals series. We have the Dogs facing St Kilda and Geelong taking on Collingwood in the preliminary finals this weekend. Both games will be fought tooth and nail. However, when a team has a week off, it does wonders for the players’ legs. That’s been proven time and time again.

Geelong, with its magical midfield, and St Kilda, with its hungry and skilful key position players, are favoured to win Grand Final berths.

I can’t see the Magpies beating the Cats. Geelong is one the most formidable sides of 2009. They are too hungry to lose, and learned from their embarrassing Grand Final loss to Hawthorn last year.

The Saints are brilliantly led by coach Ross Lyon and skipper Nick Riewoldt. It could be touch and go … but I can’t see the Saints losing to the Dogs. St Kilda is clearly the most consistent team of the year.

Now that the Saints’ yips appear under control, it seems unlikely that the Doggies could seriously threaten St Kilda’s premiership aspirations.

Whatever happens next weekend, the teams that win will handle “finals fever” better than their rivals.

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Simmo says:

      10:35am | 14/09/09

      Gee what a shock that the Victorian media is happy that the finals are down to all Victorian clubs…...

    • iansand says:

      12:01pm | 14/09/09

      This is good news.  That silly game should be kept south of the Murray, where it belongs.

    • R says:

      02:03pm | 14/09/09

      Good article Jules. Keep up the great work. Why aren’t you in Caro’s chair?

    • Brad Thomson says:

      03:05pm | 14/09/09

      R u serious R? The msg of this article appears to be “the teams that win will handle “finals fever” better than their rivals.”
      WOW, what an astonishing insight! The question is, will the Punch actually publish this negative comment ... they don’t usually

    • Dan says:

      04:20pm | 14/09/09

      What’s with this ‘Vics’ talk? Football is about club, not state. I barrack for Melbourne, and in the finals I’m barracking for the Bulldogs, followed by St Kilda, but I would much rather West Coast or Brisbane win the flag rather than Collingwood or Geelong. State of Origin died 10 years ago, and a major reason was that fans were more concerned with how their clubs went than with how their state goes. Just because Collingwood is Victorian, doesn’t mean that Victorian non-Collingwood fans should barrack for them.

    • Julie Tullberg says:

      04:50pm | 14/09/09

      Hey Dan, There will always be rivalry between the states. Those origin games have fuelled interstate rivalry. That intense rivalry does linger. Victorian-based clubs have been fighting for years. Moves to make the competition more equitable has put a strain on Victorian clubs. The results these finals show the genuine, hard work of the Victorian clubs. Well done Victoria. It’s justice for you guys to show a strong standing this finals series. And Brad T ... football is a mental game. History shows the teams that handle finals pressure better will win. Just an observation that’s been proven time and time again. And R ... I like your style. Thanks for your positivity!!

    • Julian P says:

      04:51pm | 14/09/09

      Come on Brad. There’s nothing wrong with pointing out what really happens. Formula for winning? The team that believes in winning the most.

    • Mr Pastry says:

      09:24pm | 14/09/09

      What an interesting sport AFL is - a suburb of Melbourne plays a suburb of Melbourne it is a very hollow national game.  Should go back to VFL label for all the attention it gets elsewhere.

    • Darren Parkin says:

      02:09am | 15/09/09

      Julie, no one cares for Aussie Rules beoynd Vic, SA and WA. why don’t more people follow the VFL?

    • tamz says:

      08:47am | 16/09/09

      Do the numbers. AFL is still the closest we have to a national code:

      AFL: 8 from Vic,  2 Qld, 2 WA, 2 SA, 1 NSW

      NRL: 10 from NSW, 3 Qld, 1 Vic, 1 SA, 1 NZ

      Aussie Rules also has very strong state based competitions in WA, SA, Tas and NT.

    • Greg Roberts says:

      11:15am | 16/09/09

      Tamz your numbers are all wrong.

      AFL: Vic 10, NSW 1, Qld 1, SA 2, WA 2

      NRL: no SA team

      Also, to say Tas is a strong state league is laughable. They have not had a state league for many moons and only this year restarted it. Victoria has the number one state league - the VFL - in the country. Tas and NT is no where near VFL or even SANFL or WAFL level. Victoria also has the best junior production line in the TAC Cup.

    • tamz says:

      01:20am | 17/09/09

      Wow, that’s an epic failure of arithmatic on my part. How embarassment.

      The point stands though: AFL has a broader following across the country than rugby.

      While Tas and NT might not have the strongest competitions (and you could argue that’s due to their relative tiny-ness), they have massive fan bases and more than a few of their sons end up playing in the big league. Can you say that for rugby?

    • Horace says:

      09:56am | 17/09/09

      rugby is international, AFL is not simple. Actually, AFL is just suburban Melbourne dressed-up in national league clothes.

    • S.L says:

      04:29pm | 17/09/09

      As a NSW based fan of all codes I can never understand why the AFL doesn’t have a team south of Bass Strait? Hawthorn is just a token effort that fools no one that their top brass give a toss! NRL in my state are the same with the Central Coast region between Newcastle and Sydney getting kicked in the face every time there was an attempt to start a team with more than enough money, facilities and juniors. Having a weak comp down south is no excuse for the AFL as the Swans and Lions have very, very few “locals” on their rosters and the Storm League team has ZIP, ZERO, NONE!!!! so how really can either code claim national status….....

    • Craig Schubert says:

      07:11pm | 17/09/09

      The Punch celebrating Victorian football? isnt it a website catering to people of all race, colours, creed ?  If this is the way the cloumn is headed , youve lost my patronage ..adios Mexicans

    • Greg Roberts says:

      09:57am | 18/09/09

      S.L., I tend to agree that Hawthorn should move permanently to Tassie rather than their current half-hearted approach. It would also reduce the number of suburban Melbourne teams clogging up an overstocked marketplace.

    • Melissa Mundy says:

      02:06pm | 18/09/09

      Julie, do you think another Victorian country team should enter the AFL? I see North Ballarat’s VFL ground is getting a mutli-million upgrade. What about the Seymour Lions in the AFL? There is a big bush following of the native game. i hope you’re not Melb centric.

    • Malara says:

      02:34pm | 18/09/09

      Listen here Craig,  Aussie Rules started in Victoria and rightly is its epicentre. other states, who cares???

    • Julie Tullberg says:

      05:03pm | 18/09/09

      Hi Melissa, Thanks for your response. I’m not Melb centric .... definitely not! I’m open-minded about the potential of the AFL.
      Having said that, there are serious plans for more interstate development and I agree with the AFL’s strategy here. I think another Victorian team would over-populate the AFL in Victoria. Country players with potential always have the opportunity to be recruited to an AFL team. Although, it would be handier if they are drafted locally. There are plenty of healthy aspects, re: country football and I would like to see those communities further develop because they are important socially and economically. Country football clubs provide a weekly focus for many local people, who enjoy the camaraderie and social support that the sport provides, particularly in tough economic times. From a feasibility point of view, I think the AFL would consider Ballarat and Seymour unlikely choices.

    • James McDonald says:

      12:41pm | 30/09/09

      Please don’t classify Geelong as Victorian! Us Melburnians consider Geelong an interstate team, that’s why everyone was going for St Kilda in the GF. Hopefully we can bring the flag back to Melbourne next year through Hawthorn or St Kilda. If Geelong win again, I’ll change to NRL and support Storm, at least they’re Melbourne!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter