You can’t understand the history of social progress in Australia without understanding the union movement.

Illustration: Sturt Krygsman

Unions have been the way in which ordinary Australians have made their voice heard in Government.

The way in which workers from shearers and nurses to factory workers have got together to build a common cause and combine their strength.

From the eight-hour day, the idea of a living wage, aged pensions, equal pay for women, workers compensation, through to recent debates about childcare and maternity leave, unions have been in the forefront of change.

Every May Day I am reminded of what we have achieved, and what an honour it is for me to represent Australian workers.

Unions have over two million members across Australia. That’s a diverse group of people, representing every part of the nation and every sector of the economy.

The strength of unions has always been that they respect and listen to their members. When unions lose their way, it is because they have lost touch with what their members want them to do.

I believe the strength of the ACTU is that through its 40-odd affiliate unions, it listens to its members, and respects their different views and circumstances.

Union delegates work hard in thousands of workplaces across Australia to ensure that workers’ interests are not ignored.

This is why the ACTU has launched the Working Australia Census 2011. This is our way of using modern technology to enhance our communication with workers.

The online census is open to all workers – union members or not – and allows you to give your views on issues including work/life balance, workplace fairness and the social benefits you think unions should be fighting for.

This is the biggest survey in the history of Australian unions, and we will use the research to shape our campaigns for the future.

The data information we get will make our arguments more persuasive when we sit down with employers or governments to fight for workers’ rights. It will give strength to the voice of working people.

We are doing this because work is not just about pay, it is about fairness and respect for the physical, mental and emotional labour that people perform. It is about making sure that work is part of a balanced life, and that workers can make it home safely at the end of a shift.

It is sometimes put about that unions are an anachronism, that somehow workers individually are now powerful enough not to need them, or that they stand in the way of prosperity.

Tell that to the asbestos-poisoned workers of Australia, who have relied on the union movement to deliver them some belated justice.

Tell that to workers on the minimum wage, whose only hope of a pay increase is through the Minimum Wage Case.

Sometimes the only way you will be listened to is if you shout in unison.

The work of the union movement is never finished. No matter what we achieve, the values of fairness and solidarity in the workplace and in society need to maintained.

The 21st century has seen big changes in the way people work. The rise in casual work, in unpaid overtime, and in families having to work three or four jobs to survive.

I know that many families are struggling with the rising cost of living, and with the difficulty of renting or buying a home.

These struggles are made worse by the fact that many are in precarious insecure work – where they can not predict the hours they will work or their income from one week to the next.

I know these workers can not fly to Canberra to lobby politicians, or put together their own ad campaigns to influence public opinion.

They need someone to speak up on their behalf.

Unions have been the voice of ordinary Australians for over a century and we want to make sure that tradition continues.

The challenges workers face will not go away, but they will change. Unions are changing with them, so we can maintain our role of supporting Australians, and providing a voice for those people whose voice is often ignored.

99 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      05:40am | 02/05/11

      What utter nonsense. Unions give voices to union officials - not to members or to anyone else. And with union membership at around 20% of the workforce, even those they claim to repreesent are a tiny fraction of the population.

      Unions are simply a career path for Labor politicians, and they don’t care what the people think. Just look at issues like the carbon tax or asylum seekers to see that.

    • TChong says:

      08:25am | 02/05/11

      ‘unions are simply a career path…..
      Complete BS there Erick.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      09:24am | 02/05/11

      TChong

      how about a head count of the current Ministry ....

    • Col the Pariah says:

      10:35am | 02/05/11

      “The data information we get will make our arguments more persuasive when we sit down with employers or governments to fight for workers’ rights.”

      Sounds akin to a push poll to me.  It seems she knows the answers she is going to get before the results are even in, or any one has filled it out.  Well, we all know the answers you get are dependant on the questions you ask.  However, wait until it the results are in, it will be bandied about as the truth of the normal Aussie voice in a truly nauseating fashion..

    • Liam says:

      10:47am | 02/05/11

      Im of the opinion that unions have a place in todays society, a very very small place. They should only be able to help protect wronged workers and not be able to demand pay rises and conditions with threat of strike, they should not have the power to be able to walk onto any workplace and disrupt production while talking with workers about there rights. And they definately should not have any place in politics, (wayne swann, greg combet, bill shorten among others) what useless idiots

    • randomscrub says:

      12:57pm | 02/05/11

      Erick

      My union represented me in a workplace dispute and did an excellent job of ensuring my rights and interests were upheld during the process. In addition, I am provided with regular information about union activities, changes to legislation, social events, lectures and so forth. I greatly value the contribution unions make, particularly having been through the wringer.

      Unions are a training ground for Labor politicians, yes - the Labor Pary was born out of the union movement so no surprises there.

      To go on to say that Labor politicians (or politicians of any persausion) don’t care what people think is frogshit of a fairly high order. You cite carbon tax and asylum seekers but don’t talk about the day-to-day activities of politicians: school visits, street corner meetings, fetes, electorate office work and so on ... it is a difficult, time-consuming job requiring absolute dedication to do properly and it does make a difference to people. Change is hard, representing a community is hard - making absolutist statements on the internet is trivially easy ...

      You seem to equate your opinion with absolute fact - dangerous epistemological waters to sail ...

    • Alex Stanford says:

      11:45am | 03/05/11

      Erik really is an innocent is’nt he? Over the last five years I’ve worked in non-union workplaces (through necessity, not choice). The difference from those with a union presence is very obvious. Company decisions are announced (sometimes just implemented) with no consultation with the workforce. Mistakes are sometimes made that would’nt if management talked with the people doing the work could have told them.
      Its a shame that only 20% of the workforce are in unions, because their presence makes for a better workplace.

    • acotrel says:

      05:53am | 02/05/11

      What a load of CRAP?  Next you’ll be trying to te ll us that unions are intrinsically democratic, and that Gough Whitlam actually achieved social change after years of meanspirited do-nothing conservative govenments?  Everybody knows that the unions are run by thugs only interested in increasing their own bank balances! Why should benevolent employers have to tolerate these upstarts in their workplaces?

    • Ozymandius says:

      01:24pm | 02/05/11

      ‘Benevolent employers’? What universe are you living in? It sure as hell is not the same universe as mine. While some Unions go too far, as a whole Unions are essential to prevent employers from crushing their workforce with unreasonable demands (cf ‘unpaid OT’ among others).

    • Super D says:

      06:30am | 02/05/11

      I completed the survey.  It seems to be eligible to win the prize you have to agree to being contacted by a union representative.  I’d need a guaranteed $1000 to do that.

    • TimB says:

      06:37am | 02/05/11

      What self-serving rubbish.

      “Unions have been the voice of ordinary Australians for over a century and we want to make sure that tradition continues.”

      Sorry to break it to you. It seems that there’s ordinary people being heard without your help. I know, I know, you’re fighting to remain relevant. Here’s some free advice:

      If you puport to be the voice of ordinary Australians, and your members are telling you that they aren’t impressed with the carbon tax….you don’t come on places like the Punch spruiking said tax. You aren’t listening to what your members want. You’re telling them what they want. And that doesn’t make you the voice of anyone.

      The people can do just fine (if not better) without you Ged.

    • Phil says:

      07:44am | 02/05/11

      Correct Tim. They are telling their members what they want the said members to believe. I would say more union members than not dont want a carbon tax. Yet Ged and her ilk spruik it as though it must be even though many of their members could loose a job, money etc etc.
      I know acotrel is being satrical, but many a true word spoken in jest, unions leaders are just in it for themselves, a career path into labor party politics. Yes some would care for workers, but in reality they are just interested in themselves, just like that former official who is a federal member for labor in NSW and is being investigated for using the union credit card on getting a happy ending.

    • TChong says:

      08:42am | 02/05/11

      TimB , Phil- notice how you want to focus on the carbon tax.
      The unions are about more than just that.
      TimB you work 38 hrs,? super paid for you? you expert qualifications suitably reimbursed ? Annual leave? Sick leave? FACS ?
      All of these and more had to be fought for , buy unions,
      Do you really think employers were ever going to give any of these?

    • TimB says:

      09:04am | 02/05/11

      Yes Chongy. And now we’ve got them, they’re enshrined in law by the government. The job is done.

      Or do you really think that if unions disappeared tomorrow, that all of those things would instantly go away too?

    • Markus says:

      09:24am | 02/05/11

      Exactly, Tim. How long are we expected to keep handing over a percentage of our income to unions in thanks for what they achieved decades ago?

    • TChong says:

      09:40am | 02/05/11

      TimB - I reckon that govts can do exactly that.
      Howard, Abbott , Hockey tried.
      The wage earners showed what they thought.
      But Tim, if Workchoices is so good, why does Abbott now disown it?

    • Crash override says:

      09:47am | 02/05/11

      “Yes Chongy. And now we’ve got them, they’re enshrined in law by the government. The job is done.

      Or do you really think that if unions disappeared tomorrow, that all of those things would instantly go away too?”
      TimB - you are absolutely right. Once a workplace right is enshrined in law it can never be changed. Oh wait, there was that WorkChoices thing right ? pretty much as soon as the Liberals had a legislative blank cheque they went hard and fast removing the rights of workers. Plenty of union and non-union members got burned over that pretty quick with previously legislated rights and entitlement stripped away overnight. Here is your new AWA, most of the old conditions are gone - but its better that way anyway. Here is the pen - sign or leave! Remember that?

      As an ex-organiser I have never once considered a political career, and pretty much all of my colleagues didn’t either. Sure some union officials do, but these are still in the minority overall. So do a lot of lawyers consider political life, big deal…

    • acotrel says:

      09:56am | 02/05/11

      @Phil I agree!  Unionists are just in it for themselves!  Especially when they perform Job Safety Analyses which dramatically reduce injuries to workers by improving the workplace processes.  It’s all done out of self-interest!

    • acotrel says:

      10:04am | 02/05/11

      @TimB
      ‘Yes Chongy. And now we’ve got them, they’re enshrined in law by the government. The job is done.

      Or do you really think that if unions disappeared tomorrow, that all of those things would instantly go away too? ‘

      In about 1900, there were people who believed yhat we’d invented all the important inventions, made all the possible discoveries.
      Are you like that?
      I’d point out that in the US the fortune 500 companies have employee share ownership right throughout their structures.  When we’ve moved to that, the role of the unions will change.  These days unions are needed more than ever before.  The abortive changes prescribed by Workchoices are evidence of that!

    • Phil says:

      10:14am | 02/05/11

      TC I work about 80 plus each week. Most of my life I have worked 50 plus, often when the pressure was on 100. I am self employed so anything I put into super is my own coin, but I have to pay nearly $13000 a week for employees. See I have SFA in super, but other assets, cause I recon by the time I am 55/65 or whatever they say I can start to spend it, they will have come up with ways to make you take it in a pension only, tax you to the hilt to pay for societies underachievers who werent prudent in life and put away for a rainy day.
      Yes I will concede, unions did serve a purpose, but that was decades ago, in the past 20 years senior unionists have used the unions as a stepping stone to a safe ALP seat and socialist nirvana.
      I would be prepared to bet you that Ged will make her way into politics, just like Paul Howes is probably a future PM, mightnt agree with him but at least he appears to have brains and can convey a message the current lot of misfits cant.
      If I take annual leave, no one pays me, and I paid for any qualifications myself.

    • TimB says:

      10:24am | 02/05/11

      Don’t lie Chongy. Workchoices took away none of the conditions you speak of. They still had the 38 hour week. They still had Annual leave. Sick Leave. All that stuff.

      But let’s pretend that the evil Coalition was trying to force every Australian worker into slavery. What happened? Oh yes, as you said:

      “The wage earners showed what they thought”

      The *wage earners*. Not the unions. What’s that stat thrown around about union membership? 20% or so? I’m fairly certain Ruddy captured a little bit more of the vote than that.
      So it seems that more than a few people who aren’t members of unions took matters into their own hands. They were able to vote without the unions holding them by the hand.

      As long as the government is subject to the will of the people, we don’t have an issue. I think you’ll find that all those years ago back when the uninions first started, the people didn’t hold that kind of power. Now they do. Times have changed. And it’s time the unions recognized that fact.

    • acotrel says:

      10:32am | 02/05/11

      @Phil Even I know about the value of assetts. What’s your business going to be worth when you sell it?  Will it have been worth the pain?  I don’t believe you are doing it just for fun, or to fill in your time away from the idiocy of another employer! It really shits me when people are making an invisible dollar and still grizzle. In my case I worked for salary and attended night classes until I was age 57.  Do I count that all as hours worked and include the recreation leave I used to study.  Who should I send the bill to? I haven’t got a business to sell!

    • jf says:

      11:32am | 02/05/11

      acotrel says:10:32am | 02/05/11

      “I haven’t got a business to sell!”

      There’s nothing from stopping you from building one acotrel. All you have to do is have an idea, work out how to implement, put your own capital at risk, navigate endless bureaucracy, build processes to deal with mindless rules thought up by public servants justifying their existence and work like a dog.

      There’s nothing at all stopping you from doing it other than a government who is slowly and surely making Australia a place in which the potential rewards from building something are eroded. Why would anyone do all of the above as well as accepting the potential downside from a failed business when their potential upside is no more than they could get working 37.5 hours per week.

    • Phil says:

      01:16pm | 02/05/11

      Acotrel. What my businesses are worth is nobodies business but mine and my family, but it will be worth many times more than $ 25,000 per year in super contributions.
      Unashamably I am in business to make money. Other than charities anyone who isnt is a dill. The day one of the companies shows it will not be profitable in the long term it will be closed down or sold. Whilst I have nearly 180 employees, they are all casual and can be dismissed in a moments notice, however whilst these employees work hard and do the jobs asked their jobs are safe. Not one of them is paid the award wage, all are higher, but I expect a lot in return. That business works on very small margins, takes up a disproportional amount of my time in relation to the profits, but also helps to employ a mildly disabled family member who could not get and hold down another job even with help from various organisations.
      I am not grizzling, and I would love to know what an invisible dollar is, please explain?
      I would love unionists to come on site for me before we start every new job and do a risk assessment, cause I currently have to pay plenty to a high paid manager for them. I know unions work on safety, but as an employer I want employees harmed like an icepick to my forehead. My workers comp bill would skyrocket should that occur. Yes some minor injuries do occur. On many occassions its employees not following instructions on how to pick something up that causes bad backs.
      See we all had a choice at school, I was very good at Maths, but crap at most others, so I chose an industry where I could concentrate on my strengths. I developed business acumen and now my clients from one business are more than happy to pay top dollar for general business advice, on the basis that they dont pay me 10% what they dont save or make additional in profits.
      I wasnt born with the usual silver spoon, in fact the opposite, but worked till I got ahead. Will the effort be worth it, I would say yes, sure I missed seeing much of my eldest daughters first few years, but fixed that with the second, but at 43 I am able to do many things with my family now. I could afford an overseas holiday most years if I choose, and am starting to position my daughters whilst still in primary school for property ownership so they wont have to struggle like I and their mother had to. Yes its the wog mentality which my wife taught me, but to help them will take a massive step towards their financial independance by the time they leave school and remove that burden should they marry. Of course it will be in trusts so no gold digger can take it from them and I would be an idiot to not do that.
      You also have choices, you chose to work for an employer rather than take a risk and start your own business. Each time I started a new company it cost me $ 1450.00 Incl GST plus my time and effort. I used to buy the goodwill of companies, and that proved a success, but paying the tax on the repayments used to give me the sh1ts, so now I start them from scratch and work hard for a period.
      I greatly respect work done my others that I cant, and dont put others down for doing what some may call lesser jobs. Respect those in health, teaching so long as they dont ram socialist crap down my kids throats.

      TC if you are good employers will pay top money and provide benefits way beyond the normal.

    • Kevin says:

      01:18pm | 02/05/11

      @Phil
      “TC I work about 80 plus each week.”
      Yes, we can tell from all your posts that you’re hard at it.

    • Phil says:

      02:54pm | 02/05/11

      Kevin you sound just like another Kevin I know. Gough have him a free education so he ows it to him to constantly vote for him no matter how crap they are.
      My work hours are long, but some weeks I hardly need do anything. 
      As they say if something needs doing give it to someone who is busy they will make the time to get it done.
      I am working at reducing my hours, my aim is by 50 to work no more than 25 hours a week but maintain my income at the same increasing level.

    • Mahhrat says:

      03:00pm | 02/05/11

      @Phil, and who got you that Worker’s Compensation?

    • Phil says:

      03:59pm | 02/05/11

      Actually Mahhrat workers compensation has been available for at least 4 decades in NSW that I am aware of possibly longer.
      I effected the policies myself if you must ask, and my deposit premium was over 500K last year. I imagine I will get a massive adjustment as my wages have grown this year substantially.
      Dont start me on the current system which heavily penalises an employer for claims regardless of whether the employee was completely in the wrong, being a dickhead, it is a genuine accident or the employer was criminally negligent with the accident occurring.
      Yes safety at work must be a priority, but if they introduced a dickhead clause, many claims would not be paid.
      Mind you for all his faults John Della Bosca did turn the scheme around big time after Carr let the scheme get into the red by billions.

    • Jane2 says:

      04:30pm | 02/05/11

      TChong, I am not sure how much imput the unions had on superannuation and how much of it was teh government realising it couldnt afford to pay old age pensions for everyone in the future so they put the financial burden onto business to get them out of a big financial black hole.

    • forrest says:

      07:48am | 02/05/11

      rubbish Ged you union leaders have forgotten about your members you just use your position to further your own personal beleifs or as a stepping stone to state or federal parliament. stop telling us whats good for us and start supporting our rank and file.

    • Damian Parkhill says:

      07:53am | 02/05/11

      Sure sounds like the extreme right in here today….......

      Over the last 2 years as a baker I’ve witnessed some horrible things happening in some of the jobs I’ve been through - employee abuse, equipment & and food safe standards only being maintained in a book, lying to force me and other employees to work unpaid overtime & on our days off. While for me defending myself included a few resignation notices and a tip off to friend in health inspection I’m lucky in the fact that I work in a trade that’s suffering from a large shortage of skilled workers, meaning that I can gain employment in under a week - Others are not so lucky and those people need representation, which is why unions are still so important and while I admit that some unions are useless its like what you get with multiple large organizations - some do their job, others don’t.

    • Faybian says:

      09:37am | 02/05/11

      Agreed. I’m a nurse, similarly not enough of us. Union rep went in to a meeting with a colleague and a hospital over a nonsensical complaint re her work practices that eventually got dismissed. They also went with her to to QNC for that fun meeting. I’ve consulted them over unfair fostering practices and they bargain on our behalf with the govt. They’re not perfect, but I think I’ll stick with them thanks.

    • Huey says:

      08:33am | 02/05/11

      In your dreams!

    • jo says:

      08:34am | 02/05/11

      My son decided to represent the union at his job at the airport and was then, treated with negatively by his superiors,  The Unions in the past have done a great job, but now we are faced with the rubbishing of the unions by the media, businesses, even governments,
      I admit the unions today need to pull their socks up, but if we don’t have them, we are at the mercy of employers who want to exploit workers. The brave new world, the cutting away of roots of the past, the roots of decency, care for other people,  there is wisdom in our past, and to reject that is a wrong

    • Bitten says:

      08:42am | 02/05/11

      You suffer from the same egotism that all politicians/political-aspirants do - you spend time only in the company of your mates and this results in the deluded belief that ‘everyone’ thinks the way you do. We don’t Ged. You represent 2 million people? Whoop-di-doo! That’s not a lot. Where, exactly, do you get off claiming some sort of relevance in the Australian workplace?

    • TChong says:

      09:04am | 02/05/11

      How many do you represent Bitten ?
      Dont be shy now.
      Maybe you can go to the hit counter at the JR Nicholls site, that would be pretty accurate figure.

    • Tom says:

      10:15am | 02/05/11

      @TChong, so you are proposing that anyone who questions or ridicules someone from your precious union management is automatically an “HR Nicholls” adherent (and presumably so right wing they are mad or dangerous)? You funny little fella.

      BTW: Paul Howes stated that Ged’s and Labor’s views on such matters as carbon tax are out of touch, arrogant and toxic to the general membership.

      HR Nichols? You and Ged are in denial.

    • TChong says:

      10:48am | 02/05/11

      No Tom, very few are dangerous, madness is relative.( but I did not make such a claim , anyway)
      But, just consider, for a moment ,  how many people tend to look upon you with a furrowed brow, and a worried look in their eyes,
      And not always fairly, either!
      Finally,
      Howes can say what he likes, just the same as you , or me.

    • Tom says:

      12:02pm | 02/05/11

      @TChong, “Howes can say what he likes, just the same as you, or me.”

      Howes represents a few more than you. “How many do you represent [TChong]. Dont be shy now.”

    • Bitten says:

      11:58am | 03/05/11

      Relevance, TChong? I don’t claim to represent ‘the worker’ on the basis of 2million members (15%, I think?) out of the total Australian workplace. Ged does. Ergo, the discussion relates to the veracity and strength of her claim. Which is bollocks BTW - 15% does not a summer make my friend.

    • dovif says:

      08:59am | 02/05/11

      Unions are a time serving apenticeship to the ALP and nothing more

      The last time it helped ordinary people was about 1980

    • Elphaba says:

      09:08am | 02/05/11

      The term “ordinary Australians” is just like “real men/women” - it doesn’t mean anything.  We are *all* ordinary Australians, whether we’re represented by a union or not.

      You are not my voice.  Thank goodness for that.

    • CJ Morgan says:

      09:08am | 02/05/11

      I was a proud unionist all my working life, and I think that workers still need to organise collectively in order to resist exploitation by unscrupulous employers.

      However, the union movement seems to have lost its way in recent decades.  There is much truth in criticisms of careerist union-based politicians, who are more interested in accessing political power than in defending and advocating for the interests of rank and file workers.

    • acotrel says:

      10:11am | 02/05/11

      @CJ Morgan I’ve also been a proud unionist all of my life.  Our rep in one business was the factory manager - slight conflict of interest? For some reason none of us seemed to want to raise any issues, even though we had the most abysmal management culture on the planet! It just showed the level of intelligence of our engineers - a rational person would have stepped down!

    • jf says:

      11:39am | 02/05/11

      “However, the union movement seems to have lost its way in recent decades”

      Chongy, alcotrel, this is why you should be angry at the union leaders not defending them.

      Since their formation, unions have played an important role in advancing employees rights, improving working conditions and should continue to do so.

      They did this more often than not by bringing together the disparate interests of the workers and negotiating with employers from a position of equal strength and bargaining power.

      They no longer do this. For all the high-profile, career making Bernie Bantons and Beaconsfield mines there are thousands of workers paying their fees and getting no representation. Where were the unions when the nurses in Qld weren’t getting paid (no profile in it and it was their comrades that were responsible), where were they when contractors were dying installing insulation in roofs (better not embarrass the rock star).

      The money that is taken from members is not spent on representing worker’s rights. It is spent on obscene salaries for union officials, sponsorships, fees to Maurice Blackburn Cashman, donations to the Labor Party and advancing the cause of thieve like Ged Kearney. It is theft pure and simple.

      Our current PM in waiting (Bill Shorten) is high priest of the union movement. A man who has unashamedly rode on the backs of the workers he purports to represent. Shorten is a wealthy man. He’s wealthy not because he worked hard, created something or risked his capital. He’s wealth because he has clipped the ticket of all the workers (people who check their energy bill) promising that in return he would fight for their rights. And Shorten is not alone. Kearney wants to be next. Her last two blog posts were little more than self-serving job applications.

      That these workers have paid for his lifestyle, his MBA, his career and his ambition should outrage you Chongy and alcotrel but you blindly defend him.

      I’ll never argue with you or anyone about the role that unions have and should continue to play in Australia. This current mob, Kearney front and centre amongst them, no longer play that role and use the unions as career stepping stone.

    • Helen says:

      09:13am | 02/05/11

      All you union-bashers, what is today? Monday. Right. Remember the last two days? I hope you can remember that far back, because you sure don’t remember any history, if you ever learned any. the last two days were called a weekend. Any of you here (barring self-employees with martyr complexes) had a weekend? Thank a union.

    • Allan says:

      09:36am | 02/05/11

      Saturday was declared a day off by the football codes and Sunday a day off by the churches, nothing to due with unions at all.

    • Markus says:

      09:42am | 02/05/11

      Again, how long are we expected to continue to prop up unions whose current representatives sure as hell played no part in the successes of the past?
      It’s like saying we should vote Gillard just because Chifley established the Snowy Mountains Scheme.

    • Charles Bush says:

      11:38am | 02/05/11

      Yes it was called a Weekend. Yet i bet when yo went out you expected cafes, shops and all services to be open. I would also bet that you expect to pay the same prices that you normally do. yet the price of labour is more. we see it all the time with public holidays. everyone loves them then is annoyed that things are closed or that they have to pay more.

    • Mickey Mouse says:

      09:23am | 02/05/11

      Gave up union membership when I was “retrenched” in a restructuring of the industry I was working in. The union had been duly taking a cut of my wages but refused to help when I lost my job.
      What a joke.
      Never again.
      And Ged, after your wishy washy explanation of the Carbon Tax debate and your non understanding of it, I’m quite surprised you ever put pen to paper again!

    • Paul Sunshine says:

      09:50am | 02/05/11

      Absolute bunkum. Equal pay for women? Rubbish. Equal pay maybe for grades or positions, but more men hold these than women.
      Just take a look at the percentage of male editors, CEO’s etc compared with women. As for “being the voice of ordinary Australians”, just who are they?
      My long working experience of being forced to be a member of a union and see a percentage of my dues go to the Labor Party without my consent, is being told that I’m on strike and therefore again, without my consent, not allowed to work at of course a loss of income.

    • Steve M says:

      11:44am | 02/05/11

      but i’ll bet you take any pay increases without the grumbling. And that is the point. You quite happliy take any benefits of beig part of the union but then moan about the cost of being in a union. Members such as yourself are why i resigned as delegate.

    • Paul Sunshine says:

      05:18pm | 02/05/11

      Note that Steve M chose to resign as a union delegate rather than take into consideration the reasons of discontent of unionists?
      During my 40 years as a member of a union, I was never given that choice.

    • Matthew says:

      01:56pm | 03/05/11

      And why don’t women have those jobs?  Because the union isn’t working hard enough, or more likely, because they’re at home with their children, not working hard enough or not skilled enough.

      Some women might be stopped from those jobs, but how many of them don’t make the cut?

    • Ian Freely says:

      09:51am | 02/05/11

      Great initiative Ged. It’s only unions that have stood up for workers not the likes of Tony Abbott who only wants to enslave them in his own version of WorkChoices.

      Keep up the great work Ged!

    • Tiny Dancer says:

      09:59am | 02/05/11

      Unions have become the great anachronism of our time.  Desperately needed decades ago, they now do two things: bang on endlessly about their history (which is now so old that it is meaningless); and mindlessly support labor regardless of their members interests.  Surely the greatest vacuum in Australian life.

    • seniorcynic says:

      12:03pm | 02/05/11

      Mindlessly supporting Labor - not always true, my union has supported the Greens for the last 2 federal elections.

    • St. Michael says:

      12:10pm | 02/05/11

      @ seniorcynic: unsurprising, given the Greens have an IR policy so far to the Left it makes Labor look like a laissez-faire libertarian.

    • paul says:

      10:00am | 02/05/11

      The success of greed in propagandizing against unionism has been stunning. What would this country look like if the world had never known unions?

      Well first of all we know from millenia of human experience that those with power never willingly surrender any of that power. Money is power and while some rich people give away money to buy themselves kudos, they never give it away in a manner that dilutes their power. This means wages would have remained as low as possible, and as low as possible means subsistence level.

      At subsistence level wages most of the population would have been incapable of progressing and the middle class would be a fraction of what it is today. Without an incipient middle class vast swathes of industry wouldn’t exist, innovation retarded and unemployment would be permanently high and growing with each generation.

      Spare me the crap about how we would have spontaneously achieved all we have through the goodness of the unfair market. Crime would be off the scale and public amenities would likely be abysmal. Without unions this country would look like Bolivia has for most of last century. What is the difference between the affluent western economies and all those other shitholes? A previously strong union movement. What has been happening to those affluent western economies with the decline of unionism? They’re looking more and more like shitholes every day.

    • St. Michael says:

      10:54am | 02/05/11

      The United States, being the largest manufacturing and consumer society on the planet, and without a statutory-backed awards system, formed on nothing but rebellion and a Bill of Rights, would like to talk to you.

      Also, on affluent western economies declining with unionism? You have it backwards.  Union-backed insistence on ever-rising paycheques and benefits schemes is what is killing the economies of France, England, Germany…

    • paul says:

      01:00pm | 02/05/11

      About what? How unionism strengthened the middle class and helped them become the most prosperous economy the world had ever seen? Maybe they want to talk about how the destruction of unionism has contributed to the devolution of their economy and a slide into bankruptcy? All America manufactures now is bullshit, and that wouldn’t had been allowed to happen with stronger unions. Do you have anything else to say at all that isn’t merely preconceived propaganda?

    • St. Michael says:

      01:15pm | 02/05/11

      @ Paul: Sure.

      Go and take another look at the US car manufacturers that operated in the Rust Belt.  Go and have a look at the pay and conditions that the UAW, the “workers’” union, demanded year after year and which eventually strangled the companies into bankruptcy.  The UAW was the strongest union of the lot—and it showed, in the fact they could intimidate the companies into suicidal pay rises and pay rates.

      Then go and take a look at the state of manufacturing in the southern states of the US, where unions either aren’t allowed or aren’t wanted.  Manufacturing in there is still going just fine.

      Your error is to assume that businesses can absorb payrise after payrise irrespective of a company’s performance.  Ever heard of a unionist who ever agreed to a pay cut when the company was losing money?

    • paul says:

      03:18pm | 02/05/11

      More simplistic blame the unions bullshit. Your error is in continually repeating thoughtless propaganda, such as the assumption that all unions do is demand ever increasing pay rises without any recognition of broader circumstances of the company. Obviously you subscribe to the view that nobody that actually works for a living deserves job security or an income sufficient to live in reasonable conditions.

      US car companies mostly hurt themselves through their own incompetence, not the employee pay rates, but let’s look closer at the heart of the matter, the idea that unions make companies unprofitable. If you have a competitor that is allowed to run its operations in a market with lax or non-existent industrial relations, then they can undercut you because their margins are better. Those that employ union labor then whine about unions making them unprofitable, or more typically less profitable, when instead they should be whining about the lack of human rights and other operating conditions in their competitors market.

      Note that the US car industry “saved” from the evil unions of the north by moving to southern states would not be able to operate today without government subsidies, of course that can’t go on forever because the US is bankrupt. Clearly, industry moves to wherever the labor will be cheapest, and cheapest is subsistence level. We’re in a race to the bottom and the US economy is being gutted because of a lack of recognition of the necessity for unions to protect against exploitation.

    • Damian Parkhill says:

      03:37pm | 02/05/11

      @Michael while I agree with you on the US comment, the bit about unions being reasonable for killing the econ’s of France and England is a bit harsh…..

      After all these are the Governments that slashed peoples entitlements in nasty budgets citing huge deficits yet found billions to drop some democracy on Gadaffi. Also collecting their tax’s would help (I hear Vodaphone in England alone owes something to the degree of 6 billion dollars in unpaid tax’s)

    • The Shag says:

      10:03am | 02/05/11

      Bla, blah, blah. Typical union diatribe trying to justify it’s existence despite it’s ideas and ideologies sending the country backwards. How disillusioned they are.

    • Max says:

      10:41am | 02/05/11

      I want to leave the RTBU because the leadership is largely made up of self serving bastards who are in all reality the companies union not the workers union.The term “Good for nothing bludging arseholes” springs to mind.When Railcorp give it to station staff during the last review the union said little and did nothing.Some people work the same hours or longer but lost all their penalty rates and a weeks annual leave too boot and what did the RTBU say ” Management are entitled to run the company as they see fit”.All I can say is F***K off you wankers I can hardly wait to get out.Individuals can hardly fair worse without the RTBU in their corner…..When unions start looking after their members again and stop being an incubator for potential Labor politicians I may become interested again.

    • Walter the conservative. says:

      10:42am | 02/05/11

      I think you made a big mistake there when you said the unions give the ordinary worker a voice. That day is long long past. The only voice you hear from union leaders such as Howe is their own needing the members money to live the life on the hog and become more powerful. Power corrupts and it sure did this to union leaders long ago. As an ex member for whom they did nothing but take my money and spend it on themselves, watch their money trail for a few suprises.

    • Freeman says:

      10:45am | 02/05/11

      That’s not the whole story though, is it Ged? I guess this is just a PR piece? You could really use a good PR piece as the unions are really on the nose right now.

      Unions are not what they once were. Unions do have a proud history of improving the standard of living in times when it was truely hard to make your way in the world (like the early 1900’s)

      They also have a history of going to far, holding productivity to ransom, sometimes over trivial issues, while their industry becomes uncompetitive and moves overseas. Unions have also some pretty grubby things to establish a protected work culture in which useless workers are not made accountable for anything and new jobs go to mates or family instead of worthy applicants.

      Their true interest now lies with a sordid relationship with the ALP in which they fleece their members (who may every well be opposed to the ALP)  for union fees that go toward election advertising aimed at getting the ALP elected and providing union reps with a ticket onto the political gravy train.

    • Ryan says:

      11:17am | 02/05/11

      Unions stopped serving its members when the people running the unions became university political graduates who know nothing of those they supposedly serve, nor care to know.
      Unions are a disgrace, in fact it would be interesting to see how many of their members actually support them other than the hard earned money members have to fork over to these crooks just so the worker can keep their job.

    • TimB says:

      01:14pm | 02/05/11

      Honestly I think The Simpsons explained the union situation best:

      “You can’t treat the working man this way! One of these days we’ll form a union, and get the fair and equitable treatment we deserve! Then we’ll go too far, and become corrupt and shiftless, and the Japanese will eat us alive! ”

    • Sam says:

      04:10pm | 02/05/11

      Spot on Tim… perhaps the only thing thats changed is it’s now the Koreans and Chinese eating us alive… It may be too late considering how big a bunch of sell outs the Labor party has become…but maybe… only maybe the few conscionable ones left will stand up rather than be too busy preserving their own skin… and wallowing through the trough… funny how some of us still live in hope though… maybe the oblivion is inevitable for this current bunch… oh well it’s deserved I suppose…

    • MarK says:

      01:54pm | 02/05/11

      Seriously The Punch needs to stop being an advertising forum for this woman to win preselsection in a safe seat.

      How much do you earn to troll this crap Ged?

    • St. Michael says:

      02:41pm | 02/05/11

      Probably not as much as Sophie Mirabella, Bronwyn Bishop, or the other sitting Liberal MPs who contribute to the Punch, mate.  Glass houses…

    • julie says:

      02:09pm | 02/05/11

      I think that while there are many union organisers who are in the job for the right reasons there are others who are only there for a political career.
      The scum rises to the top and gives the whole organisation a bad name.
      If the ACTU does not cut loose from the elitest agenda of the ALP (which certainly does not represent workers) it will find itself increasingly irrelevant to the majority of Australian workers.

    • AnthonyG says:

      02:41pm | 02/05/11

      Ged you should hand in your resignation, you don’t speak for any worker

    • Tracker says:

      02:52pm | 02/05/11

      I wonder how many people who blindly followed the Unions and knocked WorkChoices actually read the rather large document. We have a slightly watered down version of WorkChoices. It is called the Fair Work Australia National Employment Standards if people will take the time to read it in conjunction with your applicable industry award. Take particular note in the section of your award under Award Flexibility.

    • Damian Parkhill says:

      03:48pm | 02/05/11

      Its still better than WorkChoices and at least now we have a unfair dismissal watchdog.

      You can’t blame the unions for the decreased standards because of laws made under the Howard era, nor can you blame them for the tepid new laws that had to be negotiated with the lib’s to get them through parliament

    • Ricky says:

      05:09pm | 02/05/11

      Damian, Under the Gillard backed “Fair Work Australia” agreement, early childhood teachers had their award slashed by $3 an hour from $27 and hour under Howard to $24 an hour since 1st Jan 2011 - thats a wage decrease $115.50 a week beforee tax based on a 38.5 hour week, which equates to $6,006.00 a year less than if the person was employed under ther Howard Gvts award. Nurses in aged care have also had their wages cut under Gillards fair work policies. Teens can’t work after school jobs as employers are now being forced to pay them for a minium of 3 hours even if the job is only for a couples of hours a day after school. Another dimwit who felll for the whining Wendy nurse add paid for by union membership funds. Suck it up Damian, but most people who worked hard were better off under work choices. Work choices had one negative though, it showed up the incompetent, lazy, union backed fool who wanted everyone else to be as lazy as they are, how dare anouther worker show up a unionised employee by actually doing their job and not looking for go slows every half hour.

    • Damian Parkhill says:

      05:29pm | 02/05/11

      @Ricky I was going to accept your comments as reasonable until you started with the personal insults!

      No, any work legislation that rely solely on employers doing the right thing, based on the naive/deliberately willfully ignorant idea that its “against the law” without any enforcement in place is just plain bad.

      Also while I feel for nurses and teachers (they do deserve to be paid considerably higher than what they do now) that’s one fight that’s still continuing thanks to those “dastardly” unions your slagging

    • Ricky says:

      02:57pm | 02/05/11

      So Ged, if your claim that unions who represent less than 15% of all working Australians (the funny thing is that the majority of Union represented workers are Public Servants) are “Ordinary Australians”,  what do you class the remaining nearly 85% of working Australians? Are they non-ordinary??? Another self indulgent blurb from someone trying to justify their own existance financially supported by the hard work of others.

    • Muzz says:

      03:17pm | 02/05/11

      Ged mentions “May Day”.  What’s that about and what has it got to do with the union movement?

    • The Original Oz says:

      03:33pm | 02/05/11

      At least this bit of self-aggrandizement was more readable than Ged’s “Global Warming is real” crap. But in writing that previous article she lost all credibility. She showed that she does not support the majority views of her members and is really on a road to a Labor Party safe seat - just a shame for Ged that her safe seat will be for a political party that is going to spend many years in the wilderness once the current pack of morons have finished shredding the living standards of Australians and driving industry offshore.

    • Sam says:

      03:49pm | 02/05/11

      OK… The general consensus seems that unions have become irrelevant or ineffective… I put it down to too much BS and smoke and mirrors… way too much corruption and sleeping with the enemy… I was fairly staunch union but got sold out by union when I stood up against government and employers… If you union heads really want to become relevant and effective again then simply stop selling out workers to your mates in Government or employer organisations… it’s going to take time to rebuild the confidence… but it can happen…. otherwise you get what you deserve… oblivion

    • Razor says:

      04:47pm | 02/05/11

      Ged,

      Which seat are you going for Pre-Selection in once you’ve finished?  Or, perhaps just a nice 2 or 3 on the Senate ticket perhaps?

    • Ryan says:

      07:32pm | 02/05/11

      Unionists aren’t ordinary Australian’s though, ordinary Australian’s work for a living and don’t stop an entire sites work for over a day because it doesn’t look like there are enough tea bags and they don’t like the biscuits.
      Unions, especially the CFMEU are famous for shoddy, late, overpriced work and nothing but hassles.

    • Liberal loafer says:

      07:33pm | 02/05/11

      If Unions give Australians voices then the Liberals believe Australians are schizophrenics!

    • Bernard Hough says:

      07:48pm | 02/05/11

      I was knocking around in the “Labour” Party when it meant what is said.  Its ethos was “Support for and by the people who provided the labour that built this country”. In those days “locals” as we called them were able to select their own member without interference from any union or national group. At this time people were listened to in an honest and open way and their opinions counted.

      Ged your world is a far cry from this style of labour party democracy.  In fact you respresent the autocratic version that is overseeing the splintering of the the once mighty Labour Party.  It is about time you professional unionists and politicians faced facts….. You are on the nose with most of the community. So what about your census, in new era of “labor spin” it will be just a tool for the unions to continue to misconstrue the wishes of most Australians.

      I lived with my Grandfather for much of my life.  He was on the National Executive of the Labour Party and Secretary of the Transport Union.  He oversaw the many great changes to employee benefits in Australia.  All you have done is overseen window dressing of benign issues.  My Grandfather would be disgusted with today’s “Labor” Party ....as are most Australians.

    • Mark says:

      08:08pm | 02/05/11

      I wonder, does this site have a moderator? Or do you just believe that hurling personal abuse is what amounts for public debate these days?

    • Damian Parkhill says:

      09:17pm | 02/05/11

      Nothing new Mark, talk of moderation here is a punch line (pun fully intended).

      Good news is that its not everyone being abusive, at least 1 sockpuppet/sametroll is in this thread - noticed it about a hour ago.

    • luis neto says:

      10:10pm | 02/05/11

      good to see the scabs are alive and well workchoices brought all them out of the closet

    • Geof says:

      04:55am | 03/05/11

      Erick @ 5-40 am
      Your spot on mate, the union gives your union fees to the Labor party regardless of your political leanings, and the climb up the union ladder is with a Labor electorate in mind, at the moment we have another incompetent trying to drum up support for his jump into politics, stand up and take a bow Paul Howes.

    • Rhys says:

      08:52am | 03/05/11

      Union’s once served a purpose, when a collective of workers in an industry banded together to fight for well needed causes like pay, working conditions and work-life balance. Sadly unions are no longer run by people who work or have worked in the industry, they are run by the same failed small business owners who now represent us in our local council’s and government bodies who are only interested in filling their pockets, rather than representing the people.

    • luis neto says:

      02:21pm | 03/05/11

      its funny how the aussie tradition is picking on other cultures from everyname under the sun to whinging poms from the comments above i only see the aussies whinging   about anything including being scared of standing up against employers that time and time again given the chance will rip people workers off just for their benefit if people had balls and fought as one there would be no crying but its ok vote for tony madmonk abbott and i hope he will reintroduces nochoices again flat rate awa’s no holidays sick pay and then when the next generation of scabs start whinging about poor working conditions look back at your comments and feel proud

    • Me says:

      07:01pm | 03/05/11

      We have a friend who was stood down pending an “inquiry” into her as a bank teller. She has done no wrong apart from being over at the end of the day, amounts in the low $20. Nothing unusual for a teller to be out at the end of the day. I enquired if the union was helping out/ standing up for her (to give an ordinary Aussie a “voice”) but she said no because she was a “trainee”!! All the time she was a member of the union she was paying FULL union dues, not “trainee” dues!!! Where is the union allowing her vioce?? Nowhere to be seen, no wonder union membership is falling, that’s why the unions jumped on the superannuation bandwagon so they could keep their power by having these funds come in!! Agree with what Erick said for the most part.

    • Joe says:

      11:11pm | 03/05/11

      I revere the history of the union movement and respect the achievements they have made in the past.

      I can’t speak for other states, but in WA the unions are completely corrupt. The secretary of the CFMEU has a penthouse apartment in one of the most expensive developments in Perth and parades his ill-gotten wealth to all.

      I deplore the state of modern unions here, and am more disgusted at their officials for allowing this moral decay to occur than I am at non-union businesses for slowly grinding away the average worker’s life with unpaid hours and eroding penalty rates.

    • Dallas Beaufort says:

      01:57am | 04/05/11

      A balanced life? where did the 05 06 07Kevin global warming climate change sloganeering go now

    • luis neto says:

      10:28am | 06/05/11

      tony albanese gets a wage increase to over $8 million plus a year but thats ok the ceo’s get massive pay rises nobody cries about it the low income families ask for $26 a week the acci the employers the states start complaining its outrageous the unions are destroying the economy always blaming pointing fingers at the poor while the rich get massive pay rises each year and are whinging about the mining tax and carbon tax poor buggers how they survive on 6 to 8 million a year bloody disgrace this nation has became the nation of the greedy look at me me me me me

    • John Livers says:

      07:32pm | 10/05/12

      Joining a Union is a great way to gain a louder voice in wanting better rights and treatment, but you have to join the right union. Not all unions succeed in gaining better welfare for their members, and they leave members hanging.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter