Last year I had the honour of being elected to the Australian Parliament by the people of Mayo in South Australia.  I was elected at a by-election following the retirement of Alexander Downer who had represented Mayo since its inception in 1984.

The by-election was hard fought with ten other candidates representing all political parties and a range of independent (with the exception being the Labor Party who chose not to run a candidate presumably because it is so ashamed of how it has treated the Lower Lakes, but that is another story…)

Something struck me during and following the campaign that I did not expect and that was the genuine lack of interest in participating in the election. 

On Election Day just over 80% of those who were entitled to vote did.  That means 20,000 people didn’t vote for one reason or another.  In the Lyne by-election, which was held on the same day, 87% of electors voted to send the popular Independent Rob Oakshott to Canberra.

There are many reasons given for the low turnout, some say that it was because of the quality of candidates on offer and that may be true, however I think it raises a fundamental question for our democracy. 

Should it still be compulsory to vote?

The compulsion to vote was introduced in 1924 through a Private Members Bill introduced by National Party Senator Herbert Payne.  It slipped through the Parliament will the support of the then Nationalist-Country Party Government quickly and without much debate, changing our electoral system overnight.

Section 245 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act requires that every Australian elector votes.  That is enforced by having your name crossed off the electorate roll when you attend a polling station on polling day.  The compulsion is one line in an Act of over five hundred pages.  One line followed by five pages of regulations on how that one line is to be enforced.

To use the Mayo by-election example again, the AEC has so far fined over 1,000 people for not voting so far with many more to come, costing an enormous amount of time and angst.

Is this compulsion worth the effort?

I suspect the reason that the Federal Parliament has not made this quite simple change to the Electorate Act is the fear of the unknown.  Many of both sides of politics think that this change will damage their electoral standing and are therefore fearful of making the change.  Some claim that the amount of people who vote will drop dramatically de-legitimising governments.  Others are worried too much effort and money will be spent on getting people out to vote.

But if you look at the international experience, this may be more of fear of fear itself.

Australia is one of the few countries that compel people to vote. Our allies in the UK, NZ the US and Canada all have voluntary voting.

If you look at our friends in New Zealand voluntary voting has seen a turnout rate of between 77 and 98% since 1946.  Equally the United Kingdom while suffering a drop in the last two elections (where the incumbent Labour Government was re-elected easily against an uncompetitive opposition) has maintained an average of about 70% of people choosing to vote.

I believe it is time for us to move into the 21st century and join our allies in trusting the population.

Australians are now more educated and better informed than in any time in our history.  Access to information has never been so easy.  People are empowered and intelligent enough to make their own decisions.

But I believe this is more than about choice.  It is about voter empowerment.

Compulsion means that politicians and their Party’s can become lazy.  As our system stands we don’t need to give people a reason to vote. 

In a voluntary system, we will only have ourselves to blame if people don’t turnout. Offer the big ideas and they will come.

Compulsory voting is big government at its worst, it is government telling the people it knows best, I say trust the people and their instincts.

I believe it is time to liberate our democracy and empower our population.  It is time to remove the reward for policy and political laziness that currently exists in our system.

Give people the choice and they will use it wisely.

Lets start by this forum and tell me what you think!

Most commented

25 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Josh says:

      07:14am | 16/07/09

      Maybe the lack of interest says more about your own electorate than anything else. The 2007 election was one of the more interesting and engaging ones there has ever been. We were able to oust your party out of power and the PM lost his own seat for the second time ever. Can’t get more exciting than that.

      It would be interesting to have a poll run for those who would choose to vote over those who wouldn’t. Most younger people who don’t care about voting either donkey vote or vote the way of their parents.

      I think we need to look at removing one tier of government before we think about changing the vote. Having to vote in Federal, State and Local does tend to breed disinterest.

    • Tanya says:

      07:18am | 16/07/09

      I 100% agree. I think it is ridiculous to force people to vote on something they have no interest in.

    • Chris says:

      08:14am | 16/07/09

      Couldnt agree more with Josh - Over haul the system,  remove Local or State Governments, remove compulsory voting and then we may see more interest fromt the electorate. This may tend to increase the quality of political candidates..

      Why should i pay a fine for not voting when I dont agree that I have too, or I simply dont want to vote for a candidate or party that means nothing to me.. Give me that choice and then we may be goverened correctly.

      State Governements (particulary NSW and VIC) have betrayed the people and not for the first time. And Dontr get me started on local level “government” - what a waste of money for nothing. That money is better spent on more police, hospitals, schools - you know - the important things that the electorate WANTS.

    • paul says:

      08:26am | 16/07/09

      There was no-one to vote for in the last Mayo election. Possibly the worse list of candidates ever put forward for a democratic vote. As a political junkie, it was hard for me to stomach having to put a 1 in any box

    • Rationalist says:

      08:44am | 16/07/09

      Status quo is fine.

    • Darren says:

      09:01am | 16/07/09

      it is always interesting when politicians bring up the issue of ‘compulsory voting’ - without being too much of a pedant - there is no compulsory voting - we compel people to attend a polling place and have their name marked off-
      there will always be a lower turn-out in a by-election for a number of reasons - including less publicity and the inability to absentee vote.
      If I was involved in a political party I would be more concerned with the shallow pool of talent wanting to be an MP -

    • YT says:

      09:06am | 16/07/09

      At least everyone’s entitled to whinge about the quality of parliamentarians we have if everyone voted….

      As for your ideas about why there was a low turn out to your by-election, try listening to my notion:
      Voters are bloody sick and tired of politicians who, when they don’t get the result they want, taking their bat and ball and going home mid game.  If you want people to respect you and your peers, retire AT elections, not mid-term.  Unless you or your family members have some terrible medical condition, don’t subject voters to the cost of hiring your replacement (ie a by-election).  People are cynical because, in a recession (I know it wasn’t then, but hear me out) former politicians are perceived to be living the high life, flying across the country and around the world while Centrelink questions ordinary everyday battlers over five bucks a week.

      Unnecessary by-elections are just another reason why voters are apathetic - politicans always seen to have their snouts in the trough, looking after number 1. 

      My question is less “trust the voters?” and more “trust politicians? why?”.  The NSW parliament paid itself a double digit payrise, on top of their already six-figure salaries and other perks, such as better than good super and free travel.  What performance improvements do we get for their payrises?  Yet all public servants have to demonstrate performance improvements in order to justify their payrises.

    • pete says:

      09:12am | 16/07/09

      Trust the people, wow, Malcolm and company will no doubt have you tried for political heresy.  It’s ok, your new, you will learn to ignore us like the rest of them, except for a few weeks at the end of the term, where you have to be nice to us, or me might evict you from the trough, sorry house.

      A question though, If there was voluntary voting, would that mean that no government would be able to claim a mandate to do something in the event of low turnouts. 

      Don’t try to predict what might occur here based on evidence from our"cousins”. We australians have that peculiar streak of liking our individuality.  Most of us would rather ignore the polling booth then go there.

      What if they held an election and nobody turned up? How much would that cost? Yes I know, it’s our money.

      If it aint broke don’t fix it.

      Why is it that everytime a pollie posts here that the majority of us disagree with their view? There could be some sort of message there

    • Gadda da Vida of Aberfoyle Park says:

      10:28am | 16/07/09

      In the Mayo by election, I would not have bothered to turned up to vote if voting wasn’t compulsory, as the candidates were of applallingly low quality. I was tempted to turn in an invalid vote. Wasted 30 minutes of a nice Saturday afternoon. I did not vote for you, by the way.

    • G says:

      11:24am | 16/07/09

      I don’t agree with you - leave it the way it is.

    • Steve says:

      11:24am | 16/07/09

      Meh. Let’s hold a vote on it.

    • Marcus Battye of Mayo says:

      12:31pm | 16/07/09

      Great to see strong responses - after the fact though. Josh - yes the Fed 07 election was turbulent and better driven by the now incumbent govt. Agree on demograghic disinterest issues and yes, let’s look at streamlining and de-duplicating our 3 levels of governments. Fed issues don’t stop or start at state boundaries or electoral boundaries. Tanya and Chris - 100% there. Rationalist, G, Pete - Ask the same questions, get the same answers. Consider it. Paul, Darren, Gadda - Yes, Mayo was poorly fought for by all contestants and parties and most candidates’ ability to perform was unknown. Jamie - here’s your opportunity. Continue on to give Mayo a good dose of who you are, what you are achieving (not just doing) and articulate a clear vision of the future for Mayo on a fed issue level that creates and responds to a renvirgorated and newly interested electorate and takes you in a better position to the next time constituents can cast their view (aka vote). With this, you’ll be able to beat the standing member record. Those who want to help shape their destiny will also vote, compulsory or not. The answer is not in letting people not vote, its about enabling them to be involved and to vote more conveniently - use technology - maybe it’s on line and over a week not a day. Think of the savings - easily enough for some localised benefits to your electorate. Happy to chat more Jamie !

    • Chade says:

      12:51pm | 16/07/09

      There’s a reason Brigg is going in to bat for voluntary voting - it’s because the people who typically show the most apathy for voting are under 25, and under 25’s are more likely to vote for the “more” liberal (small-l) parties. Not the Liberals. He’s just trying to blatantly artificially boost his vote count.

      And about Labor not running a candidate for Mayo - what a convenient loss of memory. Howard never put a Liberal candidate in a by-election where it wasn’t a Lib safe seat. Have some whine with your hypocrisy while you’re at it.

    • Chade says:

      12:54pm | 16/07/09

      Also: nice to see you admitted your affiliation up-front, rather than readers having to click through to your bio. It’s disappointing that the Punch doesn’t put your position after/before the article itself for writers such as yourself…

    • Dani says:

      01:02pm | 16/07/09

      There are a myriad of reasons why compulsory voting is still the truest form of democracy, but one of the reasons I think is most important is that voluntary voting encourages extremely influential minorities, like the Religious Eight in America. It takes someone as inspirational as Obama to turn the tide, but we can’t count on having a candidate like that every election.
      It’s no surprise that voluntary voting is being spruiked by a Liberal either, as this is the party it would naturally benefit. Those who chose not to vote are typically the disadvantaged, disenfranchised and minority ethnic and social groups - certainly not Liberal’s largest fan base.
      Without compulsory voting, it is almost guaranteed that Jamie Briggs would not have experienced the phenomenal swing against Liberal the Mayo by-election.

      Finally, to Josh, who says “most younger people who don’t care about voting”, I would strongly object. Able to vote for the first time in 2007, myself and many of those that I knew were glued to our seats on election night, watching the drama unfold. From those I know, I would say the “young” are more politically involved than their parents.

    • Razor says:

      01:19pm | 16/07/09

      Voluntary voting enables narrow focussed interest group minorities to have a disproportionate impact on electoral results.

      Compulsory Preferential Voting means the Candidates who best represent the wishes of the majority of the electorate get elected.  This is not always the case with voluntary voting and proportional voting.

      I believe we have the best system in the world at the House of Reps level.  The Senate and States however are anachronist colonial jokes and should be scrapped.

    • Fitzroyalty says:

      01:51pm | 16/07/09

      Compulsory voting is a poor balance against voter apathy and ignorance. I find many people completely ignorant about how politics and parliament work. What is needed is comprehensive civics education in schools, so that voters become informed adult participants. Then voting could possibly be made voluntary. But it suits the political machine better to keep voters ignorant and apathetic.

    • Ben Payne says:

      01:52pm | 16/07/09

      This is not a democracy. 

      Politicians don’t represent the will of the people; they represent the will of business, the creation of profit, and the transfer of wealth to the elite.

      Yes, we get the occasional fruit-loop, but at the end of the day, all sides of politics represent the same thing – money.

      Politicians are not elected to change things; they are elected to keep them the same.

    • ED says:

      02:25pm | 16/07/09

      No! We cannot become America, we cannot allow the 1/8 of the population who would bother to turn out to vote to elect someone to rule over all of us.
      Education in history, in civic studies, in our political institutions should be essential at school so that people actually have some idea of who they are voting for and why.

      Help people make informed decisions, don’t just let someone else, with their own and probably very different interests, make their decision for them!

    • emma harvey says:

      03:10pm | 16/07/09

      Jamie Briggs at least puts his full name and affiliation up there in lights. Chade hides behind the cloak of anonyminity and then takes potshots at him and the other politicians on the punch. What have you got to hide Chade? Why so shy?

    • Chade says:

      05:55pm | 16/07/09

      Why and how would you know me from a bar of soap? I’m not the one writing opinion pieces for a well-linked and well-funded “blog”.

    • Terry Wright says:

      05:57pm | 16/07/09

      “Australians are now more educated and better informed than in any time in our history.  Access to information has never been so easy.  People are empowered and intelligent enough to make their own decisions”.

      Bwwwwhahahahahaha. Hahahahaha Hehehehe. What a cracker comment.

      Jamie, please explain why in a previous article, “Too giggly on alcopops to tackle hard drugs”, you treated Australians are uninformed, uneducated dimwits?

      Nearly every claim you made about drugs in that article was just government propaganda, anti-drug rhetoric or a lie and easily refuted by those who “are now more educated and better informed than in any time in our history”.

      Why would you make such fallacious and mythical comments when anyone could prove you wrong simply because “access to information has never been so easy”.

      And why do you insist on enforcing such outdated laws on recreational drugs when you claim, “people are empowered and intelligent enough to make their own decisions”?

      Really Jamie, thanks for the laugh.

    • Michael of Williamstown says:

      11:03pm | 16/07/09

      Jamie is correct “trust the people”.  I saw the worried faces of the people who did not vote that day.  Caught out by footy finals many guilty faces late in the day questioned those of us handing how to vote cards, “what of those who are at the ground still”?  When told of the modest fine their trusty faces changed to “oh that’s ok it’s a fair cop”.  So people do have faith but we give trust to our Leaders and to this we can expect a future from Jamie.  My worry however is the lack of youth as members in our major political parties, but perhaps that’s because as people we put our trust in commerce.

    • Bec says:

      10:40am | 17/07/09

      No one forces you to vote. You can simply hand in a blank form, no one will ever know. Alternativly, you can suck it up and take the fine.
      I believe that voting is a duty, not just a right. If you want to live in a society, I believe you are obligated to have a say in how it functions. If you don’t vote, you have no right to critsise the government, or comment on anything it does.
      I think if you have to vote, people are more engaged, because they think “well i have to vote anyway, may as well have a good think about it”

    • Dominic says:

      04:03pm | 01/07/12

      Bec,

      The AEC forces you to vote and “You can simply hand in a blank form” does not count.

      What the AEC has to say:

      Voting is Compulsory

      The Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, under section 245(1), states: “It shall be the duty of every elector to vote at each election”.

      Under the Electoral Act, the actual duty of the elector is to attend a polling place, have their name marked off the certified list, receive a ballot paper and take it to an individual voting booth, mark it, fold the ballot paper and place it in the ballot box.

      It is not the case, as some people have claimed, that it is only compulsory to attend the polling place and have your name marked off, and this has been upheld by a number of legal decisions:
      •High Court 1926 – Judd v McKeon (1926) 38 CLR 380
      •Supreme Court of Victoria 1970 – Lubcke v Little [1970] VR 807
      •High Court 1971 – Faderson v Bridger (1971) 126 CLR 271
      •Supreme Court of Queensland 1974 – Krosch v Springbell; ex parte
      •Krosch [1974] QdR 107
      •ACT Supreme Court 1981 – O’Brien v Warden (1981) 37 ACTR 13

      Quoted from http://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/Publications/voting/index.htm

      It appears the Electoral Commision thinks different about what our duty is.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@wheels002 @janecat60 Prefer your son's excellent turtle.

Malcolm Farr

“@JoeHockey_MP: Expect #insiders to be a doddle tomorrow." @latingle @dwabriz& I can't agree whether to call u genius or genius AND saint.

Daniel Piotrowski

@Rob_Stott ... But don't go to Awaba unless you're a local because they'll treat you like a subhuman

Malcolm Farr

Some people are so worried re sexuality of others hard not to think they might have probs with their own . http://t.co/c2Lvg3FJP0

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter