Lately, I’ve got to thinking about the importance Australians place in burning great things – things of immeasurable value.

This land was once green.

Take a drive to the Hunter Valley and you’ll see the ugly side of Australia’s predilection for carbon - the precious fossil fuels we peddle round the world and the huge economic power they wield in this country.

Around the mining town of Muswellbrook is a landscape ravaged by mining; farmland gouged away for the sake of the big deposits beneath, its air thick with coal dust and the smell of decay.

I’ve witnessed this area’s destruction, little by little, mountain by mountain over the past three or so decades. To me it epitomises all that’s gone awry in Australia’s energy thinking.

Addicted to the huge financial benefits, the NSW State Government has waved in coal companies with routine regularity. Since 1995, not a single coal mine plan has been rejected in a place now not-so-fondly referred to as “King Coal’s dirty throne”.

Little wonder then that around these parts, there’s an overwhelming sense of foreboding defeatism in the face of “progress”.

But drive a little further down the road, beyond the Great Dividing Range and you’ll find a showdown that many of us hope will change the thinking of Australia’s mining dictatorship.

On the black fertile soil of the Liverpool Plains, a defiant group of farmers and unlikely greenies have been going into bat against mining giants BHP and Chinese company Shenhua, who have been granted coal exploration licences in the area – handing over a sweet $400million to the NSW government in the process.

For me, it’s hard not to get emotional about it. I grew up in the land we call “God’s Country”.

Like many who live there, I know that there’s more to the plains around Gunnedah than that other great export of ours, Miranda Kerr.

It’s one of the richest farming regions in Australia. And what lies beneath is more than just that old black magic that is keeping the NSW State Government’s budget balanced. There’s also precious water – a gigantic aquifer that quenches the thirst of the Liverpool Plains even through the worst drought.

More worrying, is that this ground water also feeds into that other great production region, the Murray-Darling basin which stretches over parts of South Australia, Victoria, New South Wales, the ACT and Queensland.

The big concern about tearing up this unique patch of iconic farmland is the great “unknowns” and if we’re prepared to risk such a prize for coal’s fast cash. Take the coal away and all we might be left with is some pretty unproductive dirt. See how the next generation of farmers are taking up the fight online.

When Four Corners covered the conflict a few weeks ago, the local Namoi Valley Independent editorialised that somehow our little patch of earth had been turned into a reality show – with a small band of well-to-do farmers up against the big guys. It suggested they could do well by getting a good PR team in to push the hard-luck line needed to harness a widespread and sympathetic campaign.

The Greens and the Opposition are now backing the fight to limit mining operations on Australia’s prime agricultural land. But battlers or bluebloods, I wonder whether that’s enough to get a reality check from State and Federal governments on their open slather approach to mining operations, without also addressing climate change and food security.

The farmers have been blockading access to BHP-Billiton for around a year now but the signs of fatigue are showing. Lured by cheques with lots of zeros, a few of the farmers have already sold.

A water study of the Namoi River catchment is on the way. But by the time it reports back, it might already be too late. BHP Billiton will likely complete its exploration before then and it will be interesting to see if the State government has the balls or the budget to say no to what inevitably comes next.

While the mining companies say they don’t intend to mine the plains, they have no problem digging up the hills that drain water into them. They say that mining and agriculture can peacefully co-exist.

But those of us who have taken that long and painful drive through the Hunter’s growing lunar landscape – or worse still, flown over it, know that’s not exactly true. In fact, like the air around Muswellbrook, that argument is a little on the nose.

I’m with the farmers in saying that it’s time to draw a line in our earth. At what cost is one-off combustion when we’re talking about future food and water production?

Surely something must be left sacred without the need to burn it up? If it’s not God’s Country then I don’t know what is.

26 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • G says:

      10:37am | 13/08/09

      Jane,

      If you consume any product that is associated with what is produced out of any mining operations similar to this (electricity for example) or any other by-products, then it’s a little hypocritical.

      Stating that mining and other operations like these are atrocious, all the while driving around in a petrol powered vehicle and living in a house consuming electricity.

      Unless you’re living completely carbon neutral 0% in a forest somewhere then it doesn’t really count does it?  The consumers steer these operations through supply and demand.  We need to change our own habits, not just token things like making sure you recycle or tick the ‘green’ option on your electricity bill, or getting a Prius.

    • Jonathan says:

      11:36am | 13/08/09

      G:  using your logic, there’s only a couple of hundred (maybe thousands?) of people (those who live off the grid) who are in a position to criticise the use of mining products. 
      This sort of article that makes people aware of what is going on is a key component of bringing about change.  If we all just sat around using coal-fired electricity and waited for the market and/or the government to change to green energy then we would be waiting a bloody long time.  As the vast majority of us use coal-fired electricity, and don’t really have a choice as the end consumer, it’s up to us to force the government and major producers to move to a more sustainable model of renewable energy. 

      As for me, I’ve made the token step of going to green electricity.  I turn off light when I’m not in a room.  etc.  And I got rid of my car and ride my bike everywhere.  Every little bit helps.  Including writing about the issues.

    • Graham Wilson says:

      12:04pm | 13/08/09

      How about reversing the logic and saying that anyone that doesn’t own or live within a forest has no right to talk about forests… or that anyone that hasn’t experienced desperate hunger has no right to point out famine when they see it. How do the well have the hide to comment on the sick… or the living daring to comment on the dead. G says
      “If you consume any product that is associated with what is produced out of any mining operations similar to this (electricity for example) or any other by-products, then it’s a little hypocritical.”
      G has never lived in a world without coal and coal power how can G possibly comment on anything outside that experience? Simply put it is a nonsense to try and silence someone that dares to comment from within a current system. Who else is going to be able to speak out?

    • Tim says:

      12:27pm | 13/08/09

      By your logic Jane we should be changing straight over to Nuclear power right now.
      I mean we will need less uranium mines to power the entire country and the land footprint of a nuclear power plant is relatively small.
      And don’t even try to say we should switch to Solar thermal or wind power if destruction of land is what you dislike.
      Solar power plants and wind farms would require thousands of hectares and have much larger footprints than coal.
      But that would be good land destruction right?

    • Melanie says:

      12:49pm | 13/08/09

      As always, there are those who wish to make this a black and white issue. This issue is far more complex. This is not about saying no to all mining, it’s about saying no to mining on prime agricultural land. As Jane suggests, take a drive outside the city and see where your food is actually grown, then try chewing on a lump of coal.

    • G says:

      12:56pm | 13/08/09

      Hush now little ones…  your missing the point. 

      Of course everyone here in austrlaia has an implicit right to write about whatever they like…

      I’m just saying that the author is being hypocritical, simultaneously damming mining operations whilst consuming its products.

      For example, if someone stated to you:

      “o.k. we can close all of the mining operations down, however you can’t have a car, electricity or any other related product”.

      What would you do, I know which one both of you would pick…

    • Geoff says:

      01:41pm | 13/08/09

      I can’t believe the negative comments this story has received. Thanks Jane, great story. The photograph in your article though shows only a small part of the enormity of the actual mining landscape. Take a google-earth satellite image tour around Muswellbrook and Singleton for the bigger picture.

      I’ve had the unfortunate pleasure to visit many Australian mines (both above and below ground) and I stand with you, something needs to be done. I’ve seen the massive 60 tonne buckets drag a 100 tonne payload of dirt from the landscape in a single sweep, an action that forces a viewer to realise just how small we all actually are.  But as small as we all are, we’re all doing (or starting to think about) what we can to make a difference.

    • Maragret Gray says:

      02:18pm | 13/08/09

      The food good…fire bad dreamers certainly appear to have a monopoly on piety here.

      And arguing with such simplistic nonsense.

      Without mining you would have nothing…it’s as simple as that.

      Nothing.  Zip.

      Now you can resume flogging yourselves beyond stupid with birch twigs in atonement for your Gaia-raping sins.

    • Rosemary Nankivell says:

      02:23pm | 13/08/09

      Well done Jane.  The Liverpool Plains is Australia’s most productive and reliable food producing area which withstands droughts and not only puts food on our plates but also has an healthy export industry.  Sadly another great area, the Darling Downs is also under exploration.  These valuable areas must be safeguarded from not only coal mining but coal seam methane extraction.  CSM extraction requires whole aquifers to be dewatered and is very water intensive resulting in huge amounts of contaminated water to be disposed of.  The gas industry has no environmentally friendly solution for this disposal.  Both areas are in the Murrray-Darling and Great Artesian Basin catchments and we all well aware that these vital systems cannot keep up with our consumption - let alone when these industries are established. The taxpayer should not be the ones who pay for the pollution by foreign owned companies for outdated filthy technologies and in the case of CSM - a filthy technology with track record for destruction and contamination of water supplies.  I know what I want - food and water any day over a bowl of coal.

    • Andrew says:

      02:59pm | 13/08/09

      Unfortunately, many other aspects of development have involved the irrevocable loss of agricultural land including the suburban sprawl so many of us are part of and the roads and highways we all drive on.

      It is simply the case here that the economic returns from this land resource from mining vastly exceed those from agriculture so you can’t blame the mining the industry for buying or the farmers for selling. They’re just being rational.

      Putting aside the whole fossil fuel debate and our necessary reliance on coal as an energy source, if the marginal social benefit from preserving landscapes indeed exceed the marginal costs (and I’m not saying it does or does not),  it all comes down to what we (i.e. taxpayers) are prepared to pay to protect or be compensated from loosing.

      Environmental protection costs money and these costs should be plain and transparent to all. Otherwise we all end up making decisions that we will, in one way or another, live to regret. 

      PS. It is not hypocritical to criticise mining while still benefiting from its products. In fact, in my view participation in a market is almost a necessary condition for comment as participants are at least exposed to the outcomes of any decisions made. G, using your logic, an overseas resident would be able to comment because they don’t (directly) use domestic energy but not an Australian!

    • TimT says:

      03:04pm | 13/08/09

      Take a drive to the Hunter Valley and you’ll see the ugly side of Australia’s predilection for carbon - the precious fossil fuels we peddle round the world and the huge economic power they wield in this country.

      Around the mining town of Muswellbrook is a landscape ravaged by mining; farmland gouged away for the sake of the big deposits beneath, its air thick with coal dust and the smell of decay.

      I’ve witnessed this area’s destruction, little by little, mountain by mountain over the past three or so decades. To me it epitomises all that’s gone awry in Australia’s energy thinking.

      Ah yes. How to make a mountain of rhetoric out of a hole in the ground.

      Let me try:

      “These once fertile, verdant lands, yielding their luscious crops to generations of sturdy and reliable farmhands, have been ravaged beyond recognition by rapacious miners. All is now ashes, and dust, a gray industrial wasteland, graveyard to the hopes and dreams of an entire civilisation. Little light now falls upon these vast mountains of coal dust; it is a gloomy land of shadows, a somnolent nightmare of darkness and dread, and the visages of monstrous coal trucks and swarthy miners loom, hideous and distorted, out of the darkness, here, and there.”

      Above passage to be read by Pete Postlethwaite. Deal pending.

    • Tim says:

      03:08pm | 13/08/09

      ” I know what I want - food and water any day over a bowl of coal.”

      You do know that these two aren’t mutually exclusive don’t you?
      A more apt comparison would be:
      “I would rather have food and water than electricity.”

      Mining is not an inherently evil activity no matter how much you wish it was. And if you want Coal mining to stop, I hope you are all massive supporters of nuclear power because that is the only technology that will be able to provide us with the electricity we need.
      All other technologies would be far more detrimental to the landscape

    • Dave says:

      05:39pm | 13/08/09

      Yes….lets worry about the 0.1% of total arable Australian farming land thats been taken away by mining that powers our entire society.

      Get a grip.

      If we tried to convert to ‘green’ solar power you’d have far more devastation of the other 99.9% of arable farming land. Do the math yourself, work out whats the best MW per hour you can get from the best available solar panels available on the planet today, work out the space they require then multiply it by the amount of panels you’d need to replace every power station in Oz. The results are not pretty. Neither would the site of most of Australia covered in solar panel arrays.

      You’d think greenies would learn to shut up after their stupidity and interference led to the deaths of around 200 Australians not to long ago. Obviously not.

    • Sue Patchett says:

      05:59pm | 13/08/09

      These negative comments are hard to understand, but must be made by people who havent had the chance to get hold of the facts..
      No one is suggesting that coal mining should be closed down - only that mining should take place on land that is not productive, in the way the Liverpool Plains and the Darling Downs are.
      The percentage of land that can be used for food production is tiny compared to the amount of land that contains coal.  so mine the coal there.
      Wind and solar are not detrimental to the land.  Cattle can graze round wind farms and which is uglier - pylons or windmills.
      Solar panels can be erected on poor land too, just where the sun shines is all.
      True, a lot of mistakes have been made, roads and building over productive land - but how negative is that, we know mistakes have been made, but now we have to protect the future of this country.
      The way to do that is people power so that our Governments realise that we are serious.
      Congratulations Jane.

    • Mike says:

      06:28pm | 13/08/09

      Jane you have every reason to be concerned for the Liverpool Plains and other prime agricultural lands.

      Tens of thousands of hectares is no small footprint.  These deep rich black soils have the ability to produce food through the most devastating droughts., due to their fertility and water holding ability.

      Coal and gas extraction and the resulting cracking of aquifiers and land subsidence which occurs after these mining methods will destroy these unique food producing areas.

      Food and water are needs that are becoming increasingly scarce worldwide.  These soils and their water catchments will produce them for as long as we walk this earth, with current sustainable farming methods.  If mined the coal and gas under these soils will be gone in 20 to 30 years and so will their food production ability. 

      Other technologies such as solar, wind, wave action, geothermal etc. are nowhere near as devastating to the environment as coal and gas extraction which has a massive footprint.

      Only 6% of Australia is able to produce food and only a fraction of this is prime agricultural land.  We need to save these precious food resources for ours and future generations survival.

    • ANDIKA says:

      07:11pm | 13/08/09

      No Mining - No Lifestyle. It’s that simple.
      Without Mining - we’re all back to the Stone Age.
      Jane, if you want that type of lifestyle - knock yourself out.
      But get rid of your car, bulldoze your home/apartment, smash the plasma TV,  burn the aircon/heater/fridge/stove/washing machine/dryer, dump your plates, knives, folks and spoons and then finalyl strip yourself naked of all your clothing and make-up.
      Now you’re free to live like the wild beast, so go on, go live it!
      I wonder how long you would now live?
      Being anti-mining helps nobody, Jane.

    • Jen. says:

      07:25pm | 13/08/09

      It’s not simply a matter of ‘environmental protection’ - (with ‘marginal social benefit’ - I would call a reliable local food supply of more than ‘marginal’ benefit) and of course we need energy too but Australia is a big country with lots of mineral resources. Surely it would be more sensible to retrieve these resources from land which is not suitable for agricultural activities ( goodness knows there is plenty of that - marginal country with low rainfall is plentiful) -  good fertile land in areas with decent rainfall is in short supply. We should be thinking of food security for future generations of Australians, not selling out to multinationals. Don’t mine in Australia’s food bowl!

    • Prue Lee says:

      07:32pm | 13/08/09

      I believe we need to take a long term approach, let’s stop behaving as though we will always have fresh water, productive soils and clean air.  Look at what we have done in the last 200 years.  We cannot continue to quarry our countryside . The Liverpool Plains is Australia’s food bowl.  It is a precious resource.  We don’t need new coal mines and methane gas extraction risking the future of this wonderful area.

    • Pricey says:

      10:57pm | 13/08/09

      Unless you’re prepared to disconnect your electricity supply and get zero carbon foot print solar PV…........ Don’t preach…... live your idealogical nightmare, just don’t ask me for blankets in the winter. Get real “Climate Retards”.

    • TimT says:

      07:52am | 14/08/09

      “No one is suggesting that coal mining should be closed down - only that mining should take place on land that is not productive, in the way the Liverpool Plains and the Darling Downs are.”

      Wait, why? The most populous cities in the world are built on what was once used as prime agricultural land. We never have been restrictive about the way in which we use land, and we shouldn’t be.

    • Sue says:

      10:47am | 14/08/09

      Tim T
      “We never have been restrictive about the way in which we use land, and we shouldnt be”

      Wait why? Because we are running out of productive land and there isnt any more and not on Mars either.

    • TimT says:

      12:29pm | 14/08/09

      Mmm, maybe Sue, but we’re not really suffering from a food shortage now, are we? Certainly not in Australia, where food comes to us through a number of ways (foreign imports, supermarket, market, home garden, friends) and can usually be preserved and stored for as long as we need it.

    • Sam says:

      03:22pm | 14/08/09

      sorry ... “God’s Country” ??? I’m still laughing.

    • glorified says:

      05:00pm | 14/08/09

      Australians all need to demand changes to the way our whole country is run not just NSW,Selling off the farm was bad enough and now its selling off the dirt beneath our feet,Australia does not need a state or federal government that assists fat cats to stay that way and does nothing year after year to assist the people,Whats the good of paying taxes when nothing ever gets done for the people,education,health,aged care,dental ,all and much more should be a given in our country .Big business has no business cruelling Australia’s rich farmland,Over the next 20 years food shortages will be high on the world lists,How will it be justified that fat cats got to rip up and throw away the best of Australian soil.

    • indonexpat says:

      08:40pm | 14/08/09

      “The photograph in your article though shows only a small part of the enormity of the actual mining landscape”

      Actually it disorts the whole discussion, you could wrap up every mine in Australia and still comes out at less than 1% of the land mass, not to mention the very stringent regulations that require end of life mines to “regreen”.  Seriously this emotive nonsense does nothing for anyone, any ideas on what will prop up your lifesytles and jobs once the crutch of mining is withdrawn guys..only so many greenies to a windmill you know

    • Martine Traill says:

      04:24pm | 21/08/09

      No Tim T. we’re not suffering from a food shortage….. yet, but do you have a crystal ball? Just imagine how vulnerable,(not to mention hungry!),  Australia would be if we had to import food because coal mining and CSM extraction had destroyed one of the most productive areas in the country. (Incidentally you say not to worry as our food comes from a number of sources, one of these being the supermarkets. You must have seen the Coles and Woolies adds, they get their food from Australian farms, including farms on the Liverpool Plains!!)
      Andika, I think you have missed Jane’s point, she isn’t anti mining just against it when it occurs on prime agricultural land. Australia only has 6% arable land, (land that is suited to cropping and horticulture), we cannot afford to lose anymore. If you truly believe “no coal - no lifestyle” then we are all doomed, our planet simply can’t continue using such filthy energy sources. But I agree that we still obviously all still need coal for the transition period which will obviously take some time. What you must realise is that Australia has hundred’s of year’s supply of coal without digging new holes in prime agricultural land. The coal from the proposed new mining areas, such as the liverpool Plains will be exported. The NSW state Govt is so broke it can’t seem to cope without the millions of dollars in royalties it recieves from the mining industry. So for an icredibly short term goal it is prepared to sarifice the best farming land in the country, which will be permantly destoyed.
      For those ofyou who don’t care about food security and still have the mindset that we “need” coal, perhaps you will have more care for the Australian environment (or the tax payers’ dollars). As you know the federal govt has spent millions of dollars on the Murray River, but did you know the Liverpool plains is part of the Murray/Darling catchment? So if a coal mine were to go ahead in this area the pollution it produced would flow straight into the Murray - what madness!!
      We’re already in a hole with coal, it’s time to stop dgging!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @public_defender: #Westpac waits till the minute after the evening news bulletins' #ANZ stories go to air to raise its variable #interestrates by 0.1%. Hmmm.

Paul Colgan

@franksting and 64-68 are all from a Corkman @pjlogue @cowoods

Paul Colgan

@nadinevoncohen do you have a keyboard shortcut for the first two words of each tweet, or is it a type each time deal?

Paul Colgan

@joekiely an Irish ghost called a mist fairy comes on dark road and pushes you into the ditch. nothing to do with six pints

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Would you kill for a job?

Would you kill for a job?

Who would work in an abattoir? Most of us have done jobs we didn’t want to do because we needed…

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Parenting. It’s the new oneupmanship. Ah, how quaint the days now seem when parents could raise…

Hipsters with hip replacements

Hipsters with hip replacements

Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

152 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter