You come home after a media-free long weekend away, you plough through the papers piled on your doorstep and a theme emerges: unanimous outrage over the axing of Australian opening batsman Simon Katich, beginning with Katich’s own hissy fit. Well, maybe his dumping was an injustice. All the same, it doesn’t give Katich the excuse to yowl like a kitten whose tail has just been stepped on.

These are seriously weird times. Only last weekend, Australians marched in the streets to demand the right to be taxed. Then this weekend, a senior federal minister and a lawyer spoke out in defence of a cricketer whose contract was not renewed. Who knows what surprise is in store for next weekend? Perhaps someone on Australia’s Got Talent will actually have, you know, talent.

Katich, of course, does have talent. You don’t score 4,188 runs in 56 Tests at an average of 45.03 by getting lucky. But by no stretch of the imagination was he one of the greats of Australia’s dominant era, or what might politely be termed the transitional era thereafter.

Don’t be fooled by his recent stats, which everyone trotted out this weekend in his defence. Sure, Katich made more runs than his team mates in recent years. Hello-o. That’s because none of his team-mates can lay bat on ball these days. And OK, the Kat made more runs than anyone in world cricket bar England’s Alistair Cook in the last three years. That’s because Australia plays twice as many Tests as most other nations.

If you’re one of the Katich defenders, ask yourself this. What was his really big moment? All great batsmen have unforgettable moments when they don’t just score runs, but runs that really matter. Remember Gilly in Perth in ‘06, and all those years back with Langer in Hobart? Or Steve Waugh’s countless match-winning knocks? So when was Katich’s big day in the sun? Struggling, aren’t you.

The fact is, Katich went missing in action when he was often most needed. In the fateful 2005 Ashes series, he passed 50 just twice. He started the 2009 Ashes with a century, then did bugger all afterwards. That century came in a match where we agonisingly couldn’t take the last English wicket.

No one’s saying the Cardiff draw was Katich’s fault. But the guy somehow didn’t put game out of other teams’ reach. Not like Hayden and Langer did. Fact is, Katich is best remembered for his dressing room stoush with Michael Clarke rather than his heroics out in the middle.

None of this is to argue that Katich is not still among the best 25 players in the country. Even at age 35, he is clearly still in the top 10. Neither is it to excuse the national selectors for this or a range of other baffling decisions in recent times. Their ongoing ineptitude has quite rightly been turned into the lead story in the Katich debacle.

But for all that, it is not for players to sook when they don’t like the selectors’ thinking. As much as we yearn for characters in sport, and for guys to speak their minds instead of regurgitating the same tired old quotes, Katich’s outburst was nothing more than a sook.

See, this is sport, last anyone checked. And in sport, as in life, unfair stuff happens. People pick teams for various reasons, right or wrong. Sometimes that old chestnut of “youth and experience” is what’s required. Other times, a thorough cleanout is in order. That of course doesn’t explain the retention of Hussey and Ponting, but that’s exactly the point. This is sport, not science. It’s a little bit random. And that, by the way, is one of the things that make it fun.

What’s really at play here is not that Andrew Hilditch and his fellow selectors are dithering fools, which we all knew anyway. It’s the sense of entitlement of the modern athlete, who has known nothing other than gyms and playing fields and team buses since school days. Or in the case of Katich, since university days. These guys are in such a cocoon, they think sport owes them a living. But it doesn’t.

These sports jocks should try life in the real world, where the inexplicable happens every day. Idiots get promoted. Talented people don’t get the rewards they reserve. Bankers ruin ordinary people’s lives and still earn their obscene end of year bonuses. And if you whinge and sook about it, absolutely nothing changes. In fact, things usually get worse.

There is a final reference point to all of this, and it comes from another big weekend sports story. In America’s NBA finals, the unfancied Dallas Mavericks upset the Miami Heat to win the title.

The Heat, you’ll recall, are the team LeBron James defected to in the vulgar event billed as The Decision. If you missed it, The Decision was basically America’s biggest ego stealing an hour of the nation’s time to explain why he was ditching his team-mates in Cleveland to go somewhere where he felt he had a real chance of winning a championship ring.

Oh sweet, sweet justice that LeBron fell at the final hurdle. Is there any dish more delectable for the sports fan to savour than the comedown of an over-opinionated brat?

Katich is no brat, and his spray at the end of last week wasn’t half as indulgent as the stuff that comes out of LeBron’s mouth on a daily basis. Indeed, it made pretty compelling viewing. It was hard not to cheer for him.

But the bottom line is this. LeBron sooked because he played for a losing team. Katich sooked because he wasn’t considered good enough to play for one. Either way, it’s guys acting like primadonnas.

Sportsmen earn big money by kicking, hitting or throwing a ball around. They should be grateful for it. And they should cop it sweet when things don’t go their way.

Most commented

37 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • TChong says:

      06:56am | 14/06/11

      Katich was a “team” player, no dramatic tail end stands, or belting boundaries to clinch a series, but consistant stands that earned him the stats , that cant be argued with.
      The cricket team needs some one with a bit of proven form, so a curios decision to dump him so completely.

    • Craig says:

      01:25pm | 14/06/11

      Exactly.  Katich might not have had any “great” centuries, but he was solid and consistent, much unlike that whining primadonna Clarke.  A century every ten tests and nothing in between shouldn’t be enough to cut the mustard.

    • Matthew says:

      01:45pm | 14/06/11

      Yes, because attacking your team mates is what team players do.

    • S.L says:

      07:10am | 14/06/11

      Katich is just another in a line of Australian test cricketers with no personality but very good stats.
      You say he’s university educated? Then why doesn’t he seek employment in whatever field he studied for? I have nothing against the game but outside internationals nobody watches cricket. How can they justify the huge salaries they command?
      As a sad aside though Ant why do you include the result of an American domestic sporting competition as if it has any relevence here?

    • Dave says:

      09:24am | 14/06/11

      they justify their wages by getting paid…...20% of the income they produce

    • John C says:

      07:12am | 14/06/11

      Why are the fools that we call selectors still in office. Apart from their proven ineptitude as selectors, what do they have to offer? HIlditch was a failure as a test batsman, so unreliable that he was the rabbit for bowlers who tempted him with balls to hook. Boone was a great batsmen but showed few leadership qualities. Chapell has failed as a coach and who the hell even knows the fouth selector.
      Worst of all, these clowns are all from past eras, the game has moved on. Sack them all and sack them now and replace them with players who have only recently retired - Waugh, Warne, Hayden, are just few who come to mind. And we would be spared the frequent garralous rantings of HIlditch explaining his rubbish selections.

    • Mark says:

      10:09am | 14/06/11

      Hear hear @ John C. Hildich, Boon and Chappell have had their crack at the job, and patently failed. Cricket Australia comes across like an old boy’s retirement home for the appropriately connected. The people you’ve named would be outstanding I’m sure, and they’d have the respect of the public as well as the players.

    • Economist says:

      07:24am | 14/06/11

      C’mon you blokes in the media no why. With the Australian cricket team there’s a very clicky group. It’s like high school stuff. It’s got nothing to do with talent. Why don’t you call them out on it? Katich knows this hence the press conference. He simply stopped short of naming names.

    • Economist says:

      07:26am | 14/06/11

      Whoops that should have been know

    • Gregg says:

      08:08am | 14/06/11

      ” This is sport, not science. It’s a little bit random. And that, by the way, is one of the things that make it fun. “
      And it’s cricket which again can be even somewhat more odd for Australia’s failures of late have been more than random.
      You could say the on field leader has sort of half fallen on his sword but Ricky was also handed a side that was coming off peak years and with changes, a slide of the Dad’s army team was inevitable.

      Perhaps the demise of Katich is some recognition that younger blood is needed and couple that with a lot of recent time missed with the achilles and no doubt if there has been some friction in the past between Clarke and Kat, having him about is something the selectors may have decided was not in the best interests of wanting a new captain to do well.

      A bit like Julia and where’s Kevin! you could say and who says there ain’t politics in sport and you could ask plenty of senior AFL/NFL coaches about that too.

    • Playing for NSW is not the same as born in NSW. says:

      12:09pm | 14/06/11

      You have hit the nail on the head. Based on recent uninjured performance he should be in the team let alone a squad contract.

      The decision has been made purely on the basis of his relationship with Clarke. How come previous generations of players could put personality differences aside when they crossed the boundry line and focus on the task at hand but our new captain can’t? What does that say about his people management skills?

      I hope the Kat comes back to WA and helps that state to a sheffield shield wim. Come home Kat all is forgiven.

    • peter warrington says:

      08:14am | 14/06/11

      support his un-retention. would certainly jettison hussey and ponting, especially the latter.

      play haddin as a specialist 6 to keep the team together, and bring in paine.

      (you’re almost right re cardiff - i have said for 2 years that north’s inability to accelerate when we were 4-400 cost us 5-10 vital overs; of course the weather at the end of day 4 when england were reeling was the major culprit. worth noting that we “dominated england in that test but they scored at well over 4 an over in the first dig and we were about 3.7 despite making 600 and despite haddin smashing his last 50 in about a minute)

    • Dave says:

      08:22am | 14/06/11

      I think the Australian public wouldn’t have had a problem with Katich’s dumping, so long as it wasn’t Andrew Hidditch and his gang of merry men that were responsible for the decision. Katich’s form hasn’t exactly been great, the decision is somewhat justifiable, but no one is prepared to listen to Hidditch anymore.

      This outrage at the selectors can only mean a complete lack of confidence in them, and they should go, whether they are on the right path with their selections or not. They’ve lost the game, it’s out of their control now.

    • Nathan says:

      11:23am | 14/06/11

      Dave, your probably right. If the selectors were doing their job and Australia were winning games, sure the public would understand an early retirement to blood some young players in a winning team.

      What is not understandable is to sack one of the only shining lights in the side while other inept players continue getting contracts.

      The first in the cleanout has to be the selectors and then the new boys need to start getting results.

    • Matt F says:

      02:24pm | 14/06/11

      Sums it up quite well really. the decision never made much sense. I mean yes we have an old team who loses more then they win so regeneration is a good thing but we dropped the best performing one. Now if the selectors had made the right calls over the last few seasons and had any credibility behind them at all then the public, whilst not quite understanding the decision, would have accepted that at least they know what they’re doing so let’s see how it goes. But they didn’t…

    • Ryan Jon says:

      08:54am | 14/06/11

      Our selectors aren’t great but the real mystery is, why do we have selectors?
      Most sports the coach picks the team! Why not cricket?
      What does the coach actually do in cricket ?

    • VVS says:

      11:39am | 14/06/11

      The coach is the one who hits the balls in fielding drills…

    • Steve says:

      04:55pm | 14/06/11

      In the words originally of Ian Chappell and more recently shane warne, a coach is required to transport the players between their hotel and the cricket ground.

    • Max Redlands says:

      05:36pm | 14/06/11

      @ Ryan “most sports the coach picks the team”

      Do they?

      I stand to be corracted but don’t AFL teams (for one) have selection committees?

    • Stiffy says:

      09:05am | 14/06/11

      Katich has been poorly treated by the ACB. He was used as a scapegoat for the 2005 ashes loss. Now as our best batsman in the 10/11 summer he is again treated like dirt.
      If the selectors are to be consistent then Ponting should go also.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      07:46pm | 14/06/11

      What the hell has Bretly Beenball done to earn his keep? He was never better than mediocre when he was in his prime and now he’s well past it. Surely Katich was worth keeping. Ponting has been the greatest Australian batsman since Greg Chappell but his era has passed and its time to make way for a younger player.

    • Tim says:

      09:06am | 14/06/11

      Please,
      I wouldn’t call what Katich did whinging.
      I thought he was very calm and told it like it was.
      If Michael Clarke wasn’t captain now, Katich would still be there.

      Time for the selectors to be given the chop.

    • Brendan says:

      09:09am | 14/06/11

      Stupid, Stupid article. Essentially you’re saying he shouldn’t have been dropped but now that he has he should suck it up?

      Everyone has the right to an opinion, including you and Simon Katich. I have no problem with Katich venting his frustrations if it leads to better selection processes or at least a review of these processes.

      “None of this is to argue that Katich is not still among the best 25 players in the country. Even at age 35, he is clearly still in the top 10.”

      Yet you spend 500 words talking around the subject. You have the right to an opinion, but this is a stupid, stupid article.

    • Gazza says:

      01:09am | 15/06/11

      Agree to all. A stupid, self-defeating article. The guy is experienced, dedicated, leadership-quality, scoring runs and in the country’s top ten, but not in the side. Hm.  I guess “in the real world” a journo gets paid by the word to be facetious and contradictory about the role of a great player in one of Australia’s most extraordinary sporting legacies.

      Anyway, they’re throwing the Kat out the window for a gamble on someone young and unproven. A huge slap in the face for a guy who served hard time at state level. Until now he hasn’t suffered for his change-room indiscretion - revenge is a dish…

    • Dave-o says:

      10:00am | 14/06/11

      I hope he has a garage sale like Hauritz

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      11:19am | 14/06/11

      Just LOLd at that one Dave-O

    • Max Redlands says:

      11:32am | 14/06/11

      It’s about time one of the players spoke up and katch is in a good position to do so.

      Agree with Tim above that it wasn’t whinging. In fact in the interview he talks about others in the team as much as himself and he (Katich) is right about the way all the spinners have been treated,very poorly.


      In my opinion,(and I use that word advisedly to ensure this comment stays on the right side of defamatory) you have to wonder would (you’ll pardon the expression) “Digger” be where he is if he wasn’t Bob Simpsons son- in- law.

      As Katich points out the selection process adopted during the last Ashes series was abominable, as the results showed.

    • Liam says:

      12:22pm | 14/06/11

      Mate, Katich shouldn’t have been dropped. Even if they planned to shove Hughes back into the team, we needed the Kat as back-up. He’s one of the most reliable openers in world cricket.

      I definitely hear what you’re saying about taking it on the chin - but - the selections here over the past two or three years have been so baffling that the Aussie cricket public is fine with Katich voicing his confusion/anger. We are confused/angry to. We have one good off-spinner (Nathan Hauritz) and he is not in the side. But Krezja, Doherty and Beer are all in contention. Blah

    • iansand says:

      12:22pm | 14/06/11

      Katich is from NSW.  What has gone wrong?

    • Carl Palmer says:

      12:38pm | 14/06/11

      Anthony, I think it’s strange that he should have so much support, could it be that the vast majority agree with him? Do you honestly believe that the public would support a substandard performance of a highly paid sportsman?  If I base your performance on this article which BTW is all over the place (I think you agree with his axing) and terminated your contract, you’d be straight in court to claim unfair dismissal. Yep, you’d be the first to start throwing your toys out of the cot big time.

    • SM says:

      03:17pm | 14/06/11

      The only mistake the selectors made was not to turf Ponting and Hussey out with him.  For years they’ve been letting these guys play on too long

      Watch them let Brad Haddin go on forever, and subsequently leave the brilliant Tim Paine waiting in ther wings until he’s well into his 30’s

    • peter warrington says:

      03:47pm | 14/06/11

      hear hear, here!

    • graham says:

      04:11pm | 14/06/11

      A batsman scores more runs, a bowler takes more wickets, a keeper holds more catches, than anyone else and they are paid great salaries because of it. The coach gets a zillion for coaching all of these “champions”, and the Board takes home a poultice. What an arrogant, worthless program. How does it all benefit Australia? Of course, it doesn’t. Why do we put up with hospital beds for our children not being available, yet apathetically support this largesse for the chosen, (badly chosen) few. Because, as a nation, we are a bunch of weaklings, happy to be walked on as long as we don’t have to actually “do” anything. This bloody country has gone to the dogs. Anzacs? You must be bloody joking!

    • Steve says:

      05:09pm | 14/06/11

      I think it is a rather long bow linking lack of hospital beds with the salaries of cricketers.

    • Gerard says:

      08:07pm | 14/06/11

      I would have thought the real story to come out of the new contract announcement should have been that it pre-empted the much-hyped review. CA have just named the players that are to execute a blueprint that hasn’t been produced yet. Where is the logic? Surely the overall strategy should have come first? I know that the contracts have always been issued annually, but given the current crisis, the old ones should have been extended for a few months until the board receives the report and decides on an actual plan.

    • Harquebus says:

      11:30am | 15/06/11

      More irrelevant rubbish from a moron who insists on using that Flash crap.

    • mike j says:

      01:21pm | 15/06/11

      After reading the first six words of this comment, Harquey, I thought you were brainstorming titles for your autobiography.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Market analyst quote of the month: "It's looking a bit sad today." http://t.co/vh4Yu4OgDD

Lucy Kippist

Are Nina and Patrick already doomed? http://t.co/fIp9GvoMF5

Lucy Kippist

The chocolate biscuit that dreams are made of, @taste_teamhttp://t.co/i9s4Bv2JAu

Daniel Piotrowski

Hmm, Freudian analyses of the Hangover. Let's call this one When Journalists Take Their Job Too Seriously @smhhttp://t.co/bjy1DIuT8N

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter