Last Sunday my six-year-old son and I watched the Sydney-West Coast AFL match. It was a one-sided contest which failed to match the closeness or intensity of so many previous encounters, chronicled in an excellent pre-game package on Fox Footy hosted by former Swans coach Paul Roos.


Even with the passage of time it is still nerve-tingling stuff – Leo Barry’s heroic defensive mark in the final seconds of the 2005 grand final, Micky O’Loughlin getting in the faces of the Eagles fans after goaling on the fence at Subiaco, Ben Cousins pumping the air on the podium after West Coast’s ledger-squaring 2006 premiership. And of course Barry Hall, landing a perfect example of a punch known in boxing as a left-hand lead, square on the face of West Coast’s Brent Staker, whose eyes rolled around inside his skull as if in a Warner Brothers cartoon before he fell on to the grass.

Hall got seven weeks on the sidelines for that punch. It was one of a number of incidents – commonly known as “brain-snaps” – which would ultimately see Hall ostracised by his coach Paul Roos and end his first grade days with the Western Bulldogs. I am not about to bag Barry Hall, and not just because if he could clean up Brent Staker with such ease, he’d have no trouble with some poncy newspaper columnist.

Others accused Hall of being a rotten role model and dragging the game into disrepute, with conduct which has no place on a football field. Yeah, yeah. Hall was an absolutely brilliant player, albeit one who was so behaviourally flawed that you could almost set your watch by his meltdowns. But I would still rate him as one of the all-time greats of the game. And perverse as it may sound, when Fox Footy showed the highlights reel of him decking Staker, I didn’t avert my eyes but found them transfixed to the screen. It didn’t overly concern me that my son saw it either, even though I am a person who opposes violence, has never been in a fight, and socialises with like-minded blokes who are also teaching their kids that you don’t solve problems with your fists, that there is nothing clever or impressive about being a macho man, nothing shameful about walking away from a violent situation.

There is obviously a significant logical flaw in all this. It is something I was discussing with mates this week in the wake of the murder of Thomas Kelly in Kings Cross, the victim of an alleged king hit by a passerby with whom he had never had a conversation.

Hall might have got seven weeks for that punch, and faced criticisms (from some) in the footy community for his ill-disciplined brutality. But the fact that this punch still gets star billing in the pre-match highlights package shows that people aren’t just prepared to tolerate that kind of violence, but will even celebrate it. Perhaps it takes on a cartoonish or unreal quality because it happens on the footy field. Maybe its impact is softened by the rationalisation that it in a contact sport such as Aussie Rules things will occasionally get a bit willing. The reality is though that if you could transpose that punch from Homebush Stadium and replay it on Darlinghurst Rd, acknowledging the reality that it was potentially a killer punch in the truest sense of the word, Barry Hall would not have faced a seven-week suspension but a charge of assault. If things had panned out differently, in the setting of the street not the footy field, he could have been charged with murder.

The video of Hall belting Staker has been watched on YouTube 225,117 times. If you type Hall’s name into Google the first suggested search is “Barry Hall punch” and the sixth is “Barry Hall Staker”. Clearly, Australians aren’t that troubled by this violence. They kind of enjoy it. It’s one of the reasons why the opening 10 minutes of State of Origin is regarded by millions of men as must-watch television.

It also explains our use of excuse-making terms such as “brain snap” to describe men who, like Hall, have the odd blow up, or lose the plot just one time. I have been talking about sport, but it’s in no way confined to sport. When Russell Crowe decked some poor Mexican concierge at a New York hotel, he described it as a brain snap. Nick D’Arcy has spoken of the brain snap he had down at the King St wharf that night, from which fellow swimmer Simon Cowley has never recovered. The bouncer who hit Hookesy had a brain snap. A few days later they turned off Hookesy’s life support. Many of us have been in a pub when someone has had a brain snap. On occasions the person on the receiving end of said brain snap hasn’t got up.

The concept of the brain snap is probably the most dangerous feature of our warped psychology when it comes to violence. It is almost as if there is something in our culture which gives men permission to throw just one punch, and then play their brain snap card, saying it was just a spur of the moment thing, out of character, something they regret. And as the Hall example shows, there can even be a weird kind of reverence attached to the black art of decking somebody. That reverence is felt not just by men but in some cases also women who like the idea of a tough bloke, especially if that tough bloke is defending their honour, and decking somebody in the process.

It is as dangerous as it is absurd. More importantly, it is utterly, utterly tragic, as the family of the late Thomas Kelly, 18, knows all too well. One punch is all it takes. The sooner every bloke in Australian can surrender his brain snap card the better off we will all be.

Most commented

51 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Babylon in Canberra says:

      07:59am | 22/07/12

      The big question is, will NSW embrace the great Australian game or has the AFL poured money down the drain?

      Will NSW drop the poor cousin to Rugby Union in favour of a contact sport without padding?

    • James says:

      09:01am | 22/07/12

      eeerm, no, that’s not the question at all. Did you even read the article?

    • billy says:

      11:04am | 22/07/12

      yeah what were you reading ? maybe you had a brain snap.

    • Jurist says:

      11:35am | 22/07/12

      Aussie Rules is a great game and I hope it spreads far and wide.

      AFL, like the world wrestling federation, is better classified as ‘sports entertainment’.

    • Lynne says:

      08:26am | 22/07/12

      Thank you.  Finally someone who thinks like me…though I would take it the one step further and its not just the brain snap but just generally any punch up on the sporting field will get cheers and encouragement from the crowd…people love it…perhaps the same people that are horrified when a similar thing occurs on the street.  I have never understood how the fence on a footy field is somehow a shield and makes an unlawful act perfectly ok.  Its not the whole answer to the problem but our culture across the boartd needs to change.

    • Stephen says:

      09:49am | 22/07/12

      Exactly.

      It is well past the time that Governments and their law enforcement authorities stopped abrogating their responsibility to football administrators.

      Insofar as banning players from engaging in their sport is concerned, they can do as they please.

      Insofar as upholding the laws of the land, that is a matter for the judicial system. I would like to hear an explanation from the relevant Attorney General as to why clear and blatant assaults occurring on a sports field are not prosecuted for the crime they are.

      Are they happy for the football administrators to take care of the issue? Like the Catholic Church?

      The AFL already protects drug takers, which is outside their authority. I think its time these pumped up, self aggrandising, prissy sporting administrators were taught that their game too, is accountable to the laws of the land.

    • Brian says:

      01:02pm | 22/07/12

      Just remember - in Queensland at least assault is defined as:

      (1) A person who strikes, touches, or moves, or otherwise applies force of any kind to, the person of another, either directly or indirectly, without the other person’s consent, or with the other person’s consent if the consent is obtained by fraud, or who by any bodily act or gesture attempts or threatens to apply force of any kind to the person of another without the other person’s consent, under such circumstances that the person making the attempt or threat has actually or apparently a present ability to effect the person’s purpose, is said to assault that other person, and the act is called an assault. (http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4274/assault-laws-in-australia-definitions-and-defences.aspx)

      That reading of assault covers ANY contact between opponents in AFL. Shepherding, bumping, riding for the mark, tackling… Even an attempted but failed tackle! Who do we want making the distinction between ‘acceptable’ contact and unacceptable? All right, punches to the face are criminal. What about punches to the ribs? Elbows to the belly? Light jabs? Grappling? Tackles? Where and how do we draw the line?

    • Sickemrex says:

      02:43pm | 22/07/12

      @ Brian. The element of “consent” within the definition of assault covers all lawful contact within the rules of any given contact sport. That’s where the line is drawn. Anything outside of the rules is assault but relies on a complaint from the victim. This actually does happen on occasion, and players have been charged with assault as a result.

      Great article, holding up a big, ugly mirror.

    • Brian says:

      04:18pm | 22/07/12

      That’s more or less my point (although perhaps not well articulated) - I’m actually in agreement with the article as a whole, my problem is with people who claim the police should jump in WITHOUT any complaint from the player.

      Assault (and, for that matter, most other crimes) have always required a criminal complaint to be laid unless prosecuting is somehow ‘in the public interest’ or the victim can’t do so (e.g. minors, murder victims). To use the case of Staker, he did not make such a complaint. If the police had stepped in they would have set an interesting precedent indeed…

    • andye says:

      06:39pm | 23/07/12

      @Brian - “Assault (and, for that matter, most other crimes) have always required a criminal complaint to be laid unless prosecuting is somehow ‘in the public interest’ or the victim can’t do so”

      If assaults are being carried out without punishment in front of crowds (either live or on tv) then is there some “public interest” here?

      It seems to me that the nature of these sports means the actions of the players are on show. By committing the assault in the public eye, they are setting an example - notably for the younger viewers. I think the public nature of these assaults as well as the fact this is dressed as entertainment makes it in the public interest to not allow such examples.

    • Against the Man says:

      08:31am | 22/07/12

      Good article Penbo smile

    • James says:

      02:38pm | 22/07/12

      No.

      It seems that the weak, feminine men are taking over the western world.

      This should end well.

      Fear of a bit of biff is the sign of a weak mind, and the fact that nearly every nerd seems to think that the next generation of “men” should be encouraged to avoid masculinity and the physical confrontations that come with it speaks ill for the future when men and boys of non-western backgrounds have no such handicap.

      Then again it does mean more women for assertive types while you nancy boys sit in the corner trying to get into the fat girls pants by being friends and understanding their feelings, so perhaps I should be thanking you.

      A man who has not copped a beating at some point in his life tends to walk around like he is made of glass, scared of living.

      Fighting amongst men is not a bad thing, as long as it is controlled it can even be a positive.

    • Middle-aged-grump says:

      04:20pm | 22/07/12

      James, you are a fool. Men should be able to handle themselves and be able to assert themselves if required (as a last reort).  Your idea that a bit of biff is acceptable is moronic. The other statements that you make are equally as foolish. All that I can conclude is that you feel out of place in a modern society, and that you fall back on your presumed ‘masculinity’ to compensate for some other shortcomings, maybe the intellect. You sound like you would have been more at home living about 10,000 years ago?

    • Middle-aged-grump says:

      04:23pm | 22/07/12

      James, you are a fool. Men should be able to handle themselves and be able to assert themselves if required (as a last resort). Your idea that a bit of biff is acceptable is moronic. The other statements that you make are equally as foolish. All that I can conclude is that you feel out of place in a modern society, and that you fall back on your presumed ‘masculinity’ to compensate for some other shortcomings, maybe the intellect. You sound like you would have been more at home living about 10,000 years ago?

    • Rebecca says:

      10:01am | 23/07/12

      Hey James - want to know the reason I love and respect my boyfriend? It’s because he’s a MAN who is mature and thinks before he acts, as opposed to a BOY who solves his problems with violence, and feels the need to show dominance by hurting other people. There is nothing manly or attractive about yobbos whacking each other in the face.

    • M says:

      12:18pm | 23/07/12

      Problem is james, when fights happen it’s rarely controlled. There’s no honour in a pub fight when you face the possibilty of being glassed.

    • Suzanne says:

      09:35am | 22/07/12

      I was at Homebush with my young son on AFL Juniors day when the Hall king hit happened.    He still recalls it!!

    • Brian B says:

      11:42am | 22/07/12

      You must be so proud to have had your son witness the king hit, Suzanne.

    • CD says:

      09:40am | 22/07/12

      Paul’s missing this morning but great article Penbo. Don’t know if we’ll ever find non violence acceptable.  Christians and lions to wars to everyday people thumping each other and getting a clap. That’s human nature David.

      Name Shame Reintegration by John Braithwaite. Shame govts never took on his study.  It worked but God forbid we shame the little bastards while they’re so young and scar them for life.

      Better they go out and kill an innocent like Thomas Kelly then thump out a cameraman doing his job.  Cowardly thugs. Still we do nothing but pamper their pathetic butts too often.

    • Chris says:

      10:02am | 22/07/12

      Well said….. The gutless self serving jutification of “I just had a brain snap and ““king hit” the unsuspecting victim is as pathetic as the perpetrator Unable to stand up and go toe to toe, these criminal morons act like the cowardly assassins, deceiving the unsuspecting victim before delivering the strike with great malice. These people intend to cause great harm to the victim and should be condemened and sentenced with equal fury..

    • Tony says:

      10:39am | 22/07/12

      A good thought provoking article. Of course ‘brain snaps’ are nothing new. It is just the new face saving term used by someone who has never learned to control their temper. There was a time when most children learned the consequences of letting their temper run riot. No matter how much damage they caused there was a severe and immediate consequence that taught the lesson that losing your temper doesn’t pay.

      Today however we have a whole generation that has grown up under a regime that believes that any consequences will scar the prescious little ‘wilful’ child. So now we have those people who only learn by experiencing painful consequences having grown into adulthood believing that theirs is the right to do as they wish to whoever and all they will get is a talking to or a spell on the ‘responsible thinking’ mat.

      We are reaping what we have sown. To all those who have pursued the post modern pop psychology model of parenting I have one question - do you like the results?

    • jimbo says:

      10:54am | 22/07/12

      @Lynne.  Being on a football ground does not protect a person from the law as long as that person is playing within the rules of the game.  If a punch is outside the rules then it is an assault and a crime.  Remember Garry Jack?

    • Ben says:

      10:56am | 22/07/12

      >>The bouncer who hit Hookesy had a brain snap. A few days later they turned off Hookesy’s life support.

      If he had a brain snap, why was he found not guilty?

    • Sinbad says:

      01:52pm | 22/07/12

      Because Hookesy started it…

    • David says:

      11:33am | 22/07/12

      One of these days I hope a police officer at the ground will come on the field and arrest a player for a criminal assault, just as he or she would if they saw the same assault occur on the street. A football jersey should offer no protection for a criminal act.

    • Brian says:

      12:53pm | 22/07/12

      One issue, David - a tackle as performed in AFL or rugby would be assault. So would quite a few of the marking contests. Should they penalise that criminally? How about a boxing match, or MMA? Should they ignore some assaults and not others?

      Striking in football needs to be stamped out, but having the police arrest players is unlikely to be effective.

    • Criminologist says:

      01:56pm | 22/07/12

      It doesn’t. Criminal assaults on the football field have been prosecuted successfully many times in Australia.

    • Mel Belli says:

      10:15am | 23/07/12

      Brian says:12:53pm | 22/07/12

      ” - a tackle as performed in AFL or rugby would be assault. So would quite a few of the marking contests. Should they penalise that criminally?”

      No they shouldn’t and no they Don’t.

      it’s simple really. By ageeing to take part in the game , as long as the assaults you mention are within the rules of the game, then there is no criminality because of you impliedly consent to the “assault”. See boxing as the supreme example.

      Being king hit behind the play is outside both the rules of the game and the law.

    • theoldgalah says:

      11:40am | 22/07/12

      People who just go out and assault someone they have never met or someone going about their business for no good reason should not be able to hide behind defense.They should go into stocks in a public place and be pelted with rotten farm produce by the general population. If their friends want to protect them then they go into the stock’s right alongside of the perpetrator.Humiliation is a powerful tool that doesn’t hurt the offender but after watching his her punishment on youtube I would nearly bet my house they never look sideways again.That goes for the on field hero’s as well.As an aside I always thought Hall was a nut job.You could see the expression on his face change as he was about to snap..I worked with a Vietnam Vet for years who would do the same thing.You couldn’t trust him at all after a drink or if the moon was full etc etc. Everyone watched him like a hawk so as to not cop a surprise biff in the ear…...........

    • Andreas Jacobs says:

      11:46am | 22/07/12

      I find myself in the unusual position of agreeing with Penbo.  Well written!
      A “brain snap” is just another excuse for being a thug. In my opinion one of the primary root causes for the increase of senseless violence we are witnessing on a daily basis is a lack of accountability.  People seem to blame anyone and anything else for their unacceptable behaviour, and the judiciary seem to take the bait.
      It’s time for our judiciary to start acting in accordance with the expectations of the community that employs them.  The public expects thugs like Kieran Loveridge to be put away for a long time – a very long time.  I cannot say that I am confident in our judiciary to deliver a fair sentence, but I’m willing to be surprised.

    • eRon says:

      12:41pm | 22/07/12

      Funny how nobody has commented on Straker’s contribution to the incident. Did he want a cuddle? Was he trying to pull a chiropractic move on Hall?
      Liberatore was an expert at what I think they call tagging, but the niggle is sh*t in my books. It does nothing to enhance the game, and it seems the sole purpose of it is another tactic to reduce the playing capacity of your opponent while he’s not actually anywhere near the ball. I felt myself wanting to have a swing at Straker, too.
      That sort of stuff is a blight on any sport, but nobody seems to think it offensive enough to have it ruled out of the game.

    • Bitten says:

      01:58pm | 22/07/12

      Well written Penbo. Unfortunately the law doesn’t see it that way and there are all the criminal apologists in the world around when it comes time to explain why a murderer isn’t really a murderer, he only punched him once and certainly never intended for the victim to die.

      Victims get a life sentence. Criminals get a slapped wrist.

    • Kerryn says:

      03:04pm | 22/07/12

      The other name for taggers is “defenders”.

      Everyone knows that attacking-players are all trumped-up squirts who think the world of themselves even though without the defenders on their team they’d have a problem.  Seriously, if you play a contact sport, someone is going to try and stop you from getting that ball, and if you’re too weak to get there first, well too bad.

      Defenders and taggers - the COOLEST blokes on the field!

    • eRon says:

      06:31pm | 22/07/12

      Tell me how this incident had anything to do with the ball.
      Any tactic that is designed to basically annoy the sh*t out of someone, annoys the sh*t out of me.
      Hall, and Plugger before him were actively targetted by the nigglers in order to goad them into doing something they might get to front the tribunal/judiciary for.
      That’s not sport. Not even close.

    • Kerryn says:

      04:48am | 23/07/12

      Funnyu, I get goaded all the time and have never decked anyone. Tonnes of forwards have been heckled by defenders for over a century and never decked anyone.  Barry Hall was just weak.  Fact.  I bet that even Barry Hall has given a niggle or two to his opponent. 

      If you can’t handle the heat, get the hell out of the kitchen and away from my footy!

    • Ali says:

      06:39pm | 22/07/12

      It should be pointed out that Google presents customized results for different people based on their previous search history and locality, no two persons google search is the same anymore. If I type in Barry Hall I get a wikipedia page and a bunch of country league stuff. You’re a journalist so you’d know all about that right?

    • Tim says:

      06:42pm | 22/07/12

      You must be a West Coast fan Penbo. Can’t think of any other reason why you would write an article bashing Barry Hall years after the event. Enough words were written about it then. He paid his dues and moved on. Time you did too.

    • London Calling says:

      07:07am | 23/07/12

      Dunno if he’s a West Coast fan, but agree with the rest.

      Also, (and pretty sure it’s just me), I am amused and bemused that above Mr Penberthy’s head, there are 2 closed fists and this site is called The Punch.

    • bvmkingmaker says:

      06:44pm | 22/07/12

      David just a few weeks ago was railing against the bouncer who had to defend himself against his friends brain snap and now has changed his mind I wonder if he is going to apologize for his one sided biased rant aganst bouncers who are themajority victims of these “brain snaps”

    • Gregg says:

      07:15pm | 22/07/12

      Football is a contact sport and though most people do not want to see players seriously injured, vigorous contests for the ball will see solid contacts and injuries, it being a bit like some other sports and even basketball fans will get all excited about contact.
      Motor racing is a bit the same for most watchers would be bored to tears just watching cars go around and around without anything exciting happening even though it is a deadly sport.

      In the case of Big Bad Barry who even Julia has sidled up to, he had a reputation as a don’t mess with me kind of guy who didn’t take prisoners and he was often enough probably provoked.
      With Brett Staker, everyone ought to closely study what happened before The Punch ( no pun intended ) and you’ll see how Staker in an ungainly kind of way has his arm draped over BBB’s shoulder and something BBB reacted to, The Punch starting as Barry started to rotate towards Staker and yep on connection it put Staker down and out.

      That does not excuse it and it was a serious blemish on BBB even if Staker had no long lasting effects.

      Seeing as Penbo has brought cartoonish into the description, that really applied to what came next for the WCs Hunter, one of their stronger players of the time was hot to trot to get in and remonstrate with BBB and he slipped on arrival, maybe it being a bit deliberate to save manning up to BBB and getting some of the same, it kind of looking a bit that way.

      That the incident gets replayed as a prelude to a WC/Sydney game is not so much to promote or support violence but more being part of the package used to build up the hype fpr what they want to be thought of as a blockbuster, a grudge match etc., a bit like Collingwood/Carlton or ssendon/Hawthorn clashes.

    • Dave says:

      07:50pm | 22/07/12

      It’s a shame the good articles get written on the weekend. The king-hitters may well have their own stories, but it’s about time the law got deadly serious about king-hitting, glassings, knifings and shootings. They have no place in a modern society.

    • Jay says:

      07:12am | 23/07/12

      I have been King hit three times; In every occasion i was playing Aussie Rules and i was hit by cowardly dogs who believed that they were tough. No reports made as the umpires never saw the incident despite over a dozen witnesses. In those days Ambulances were rarely called and there was little if any treatment by trainers. Going to hopsital was considered soft so you ended up having a few beers,a couple of Bex and a good lie down when you got home.Times have certainly changed.

    • Pete says:

      09:17am | 23/07/12

      Watched the clip.  Wasn’t really that much in it.  You guys should try watching (ice) hockey.  We’ve had fighting in it the NHL for years and years.  I grew up with it.  Yet Canada remains a fairly passive country, in general.  I think people appreciate that it’s just for fun.  Don’t worry about it so much.

    • Carl Palmer says:

      10:02am | 23/07/12

      I was and continue to be a Barry Hall fan. I loved watching him play. That said, Brent Staker, should have reported the assault to police and Barry charged. I know I’m going back a bit, but I’m pretty sure Leigh Mathews has a criminal record which also resulted from an on-field king hit. That type of behavior belongs only in one place – the boxing ring.

    • Mont says:

      10:44am | 23/07/12

      I thoroughly enjoyed fighting on the footy field when I was a younger bloke, it was a real buzz. Shame was I wasn’t very good at it and used to get my arse handed to me on most occasions but I still enjoyed getting involved. You don’t feel any pain at the time because of the adrenalin. I’m now 35 and peace love and mungbeans kind of bloke but am happy to teach my kids how to look after themselves. Never instigate trouble but know how to handle it if it comes their way. Humans have always been violent, always will be - may as well be prepared for the off chance you get in a sticky situation.

    • Traxster says:

      12:37pm | 23/07/12

      Penbo and all the rest of you naysayers not withstanding
      I think Barry Hall is a neanderthal of the first order,
      and if you called him a neanderthal to his face he would probably,at first, look a bit puzzled then grin and say ‘you bewdy ’ !

    • chris says:

      01:34pm | 23/07/12

      Ok… I am guessing some of you are going to say this comment is a ‘brain snap’....

      Men have to take responsibility for their actions… in my world this plays as a direct link through to the extreme end of men refusing to take responsiblity - being the whole idea of muslim women having to cover up to stop men having sexual thoughts and raping them - even that poor woman being shot the other day and the bloke she had the affair with being scott free… it was her fault they had an affair, the little slut preyed on the poor defenseless man who was helpless to her advances!

      Men, if you boil it down, are strong and have strong urges including both to violence and sex.. and the mark of a true man is one who can control all that and take full responsiblity for what they do.

      The brain snap is a terrible concept and should not be condoned at all in any forum…

      BTW… I was there the night Bazza landed his punch…. my sense of the night was that it was a mood changer… the crowd became a bit shocked and a bit sullen… it was not really celebrated at all and everyone gave a standing ovation to the west coast player when he exited the field… when bazza crashed into the fence and broke his arm later in the same game (right in front of me as it happened - I was right on the fence on the outer wing) the murmers in the crowd were that it was a fair outcome….

    • Willmer says:

      11:19am | 07/08/12

      It does appear to be a temaprory block. I took a break for an hour or so and then was able to get back into commenting. If that’s all it is, then I can work with that as it’s only on the theme days that I’m curating that I would be commenting so much. And taking the odd break may be a good thing. Anyway   hopefully that’s all it is.

    • Willmer says:

      11:18am | 07/08/12

      It does appear to be a temaprory block. I took a break for an hour or so and then was able to get back into commenting. If that’s all it is, then I can work with that as it’s only on the theme days that I’m curating that I would be commenting so much. And taking the odd break may be a good thing. Anyway   hopefully that’s all it is.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@wheels002 @janecat60 Prefer your son's excellent turtle.

Malcolm Farr

“@JoeHockey_MP: Expect #insiders to be a doddle tomorrow." @latingle @dwabriz& I can't agree whether to call u genius or genius AND saint.

Daniel Piotrowski

@Rob_Stott ... But don't go to Awaba unless you're a local because they'll treat you like a subhuman

Malcolm Farr

Some people are so worried re sexuality of others hard not to think they might have probs with their own . http://t.co/c2Lvg3FJP0

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter