In writing about public opinion as measured by our Auspoll research, I try only to describe the findings, discuss what they may mean socially and politically, add any insights I can. My own opinions have no business here.

Let the Games begin, yawn. Photo: Getty Images

This week I’m making an exception because there’s an elephant in the room, he’s getting on my wick with his noisy trumpeting of confected national pride and he’s wearing a swag of medals round his neck as though they mean something.

I refer of course to the glorified Schools District Gymkhana known as the Commonwealth Games, formerly the Empire Games, before that, even more accurately, the British Empire Games. This one is best because the whole charade ceased being worth organising, watching or taking part in when the old Empire slipped into history – WWII at the most flattering estimate.

My case is simple. There are nearly 200 nations in the modern world. There are 54 in the ‘Commonwealth’ – which incidentally share no common wealth, preferential trade arrangements, military alliances or anything else much, aside from fast fading history as subjugated colonies.

But it’s not just that we hold an international athletics meet and forget to invite three quarters of the other countries – it’s the ones we don’t invite. If you want a crack at a medal at international level and could take out every serious competitive threat, where would you start? Say, the USA. They have some fair athletes. And they’re huge. Let’s face it, they flog everyone on medal counts in open competition. They’re gone.

China? One country sure, but going on a quarter of the world by itself. Again, hard to beat in a range of events and only getting more so with rising prosperity and economic power. Out.

Also Mexico. There’s another 110 million or so we don’t have to worry about. While we’re down there, keep going. South America. Not all of it! There’s a fly speck on the northern coast called Guyana. They can come. The rest, gonsky. And since we’re wiping whole continents, Europe too. We don’t want you. Or you, Russia. Scandinavia. Japan, Korea, most of SE Asia. A good chunk of Africa too.

Not a lot left is there? Suits us. We’ll take on the best the world can throw at us (the parts of it in Samao, Swaziland, Singapore and the Seychelles) and just watch those medals pile up. (Ok, Bahamas, Barbados, Brunei and Belize are there too, but there’s more people in Western Sydney than these combined so we’re not scared of them. True.)

None of this is to denigrate the extreme hard work, dedication and talent of the athletes competing. Nor to ignore that many of them are world class and medal contenders in real international meets. It’s just that this isn’t one – it’s more like a training warm-up.

The whole thing is screamingly absurd and I really thought by now most of us would see it that way. Not for the first time my fellow Aussie Aussie Aussies have disappointed me. Seems if there’s a stack of medals and a comp we can dominate we don’t mind if it’s purely bogus.

This week we asked Australians whether they thought the Commonwealth Games are still relevant and it turns out many do – 46 per cent to 37 who say irrelevant. But you can see where it’s headed when you note that among 18 to 24 year olds this drops to 36 and rises steadily to 51 among the 65 plus set. Even half of these don’t care.

When we asked if people are interested in watching the Games things got a bit more real. Only 45 per cent interested (only 10 highly) compared to 55 per cent uninterested (21 ‘completely uninterested’). Again, this interest tracked up from a dismal 31 per cent among our youngest respondents and peaked at 52 with the oldest. Maybe it’s nostalgia for empire.

Lastly we asked people to rank six different types of sporting achievement from most impressive to least, including winning a World Cup (eg FIFA), Olympic gold medal, major domestic premiership (AFL, NRL) major international tour event (US Open, Tour de France, Wimbledon), Commonwealth gold or a Test series (Ashes, Bledisloe).

The result tells a story – Olympic first, Commonwealth last. The moral is it’s time to admit the old British Empire was in fact the one before last. As a global hegemony, the USA pushed it into history long ago and is itself on its way to being supplanted by the rising Asian giants – China and India. We might as well have a sports carnival against countries formerly invaded by the Ottoman Turks.

It’s way past time to give it away and only send our teams to real international contests where they compete with the world. Then if one of our athletes wins a medal, I will be first on my feet cheering and truly proud.

So much better than ‘mate you caned that Belize guy in the final.’ Oi.

51 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Adam Diver says:

      06:09am | 10/10/10

      Its always nice to beat england though

    • David says:

      07:22am | 10/10/10

      Countries are lining up to join the Commonwealth. Others have come back.

      We share a lot - the common law, our language, a rich culture, a system of government which works well and has been adopted by more countries than any other, a strong aversion to centralised absolute power, and a belief in the individual rather than the state providing all the answers.

      Most of the sports played in the world originate from Britain.

      So is Mr. Neilson saying that only universal competitions are worth our participation?

      What then does he say then about regional competitions, including those where the only common denominator is the fact of location?

      Does he argue we should even abandon national competitions and just compete in our states and territories? If a Commonwealth medal is worthless what do we say about a national award?

      What after all is wrong with a competition which brings together a quarter of the world?

      After all, the Olympic Games were originally only between the Greek states.

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      07:52am | 10/10/10

      Sigh…......Why do we exist at all , don’t do anything , stop all traditional events , comemorations , celebrations , international sport , conferences ,
      stop the lot .
      We may as well because the Commonweatlth games is just one more step in self excommunication from the rest of the world.
      That the Commonwealth Games is an importantant mid point measure of our athletes preparation for the Olympic Games is irrelevant because the Olympics will be next on the list .
      The dedication and time committed by our athletes to their particular expertise in sport will mean nothing anyway because pride in international competition will just fade away when we start on those sporting traditions within Australia itself.  After all it’s all mainly based on ideas generated by our forefathers , our ancestors even .
      We don’t really want it , do we ?

    • Thor says:

      08:00am | 10/10/10

      Couldn’t agree more, the Commonwealth Games,  like the Commonwealth is an anachronism. The Commonwealth is now just another soup kitchen that we have to supply and staff.

      As for: “There’s an elephant in the room, he’s getting on my wick” –OWEEEEEEE!  Bet that really smarts!

    • Dehli Belli says:

      08:01am | 10/10/10

      We need Mary McKill-opt-out to perform another miracle tostop these awful games which at held at such great cost.

    • bow says:

      08:15am | 10/10/10

      Totally agree -  not watching,  don’t care, it is an anachronism - waste of money, waste of time - call it “The Colonial Games” , for that’s what it is ...

    • marley says:

      08:55am | 10/10/10

      Just because the Commonwealth Games don’t represent the very top tier of sport or fully international competition doesn’t seem to me to be a particularly well thought out reason for abolishing them. 

      I believe the Pan-Am games are somewhat restricted as well.  The Chinese and the Indians don’t get to compete, and neither, oddly enough, does Australia.  Yet the games roll right on, providing a good international experience for budding athletes including those unlikely ever to compete at Olympic or World Championship level.  No one is arguing they should be eliminated because they’re not “internatonal” enough or because they’re not top tier. 

      And what about all the European championships - from Champions’ League to figure skating - somewhat restricted, again, I would have thought - after all, the Americans don’t get to participate, and once again, Australia is excluded.  Yet the Europeans aren’t moving to eliminate them because they’re not top tier enough or because they’re not the FIFA World Cup or the World Figure Skating Championships.

      And if we’re only going to send athletes to the very top events, perhaps we should no longer participate in the highly international World University Games?  After all, even though it’s international, it’s not top tier either.  And hardly anyone watches it on TV.

      Frankly, I think the argument here is illogical and more than a bit redolent of cultural cringe.  The Commonwealth Games are a good testing ground for young athletes, and offer a taste of international experience.  Nothing more, but also nothing less.  No, they’re not the Olympics, any more than the A League is the World Cup.  So what?

    • Liam says:

      08:04pm | 10/10/10

      Well said Marley.

      I loved that the journalist said ‘None of this is to denigrate the extreme hard work, dedication and talent of the athletes competing’, before implying that their achievements are essentially worthless.

      I’d argue that the continuation of the Commonwealth Games should be entirely up to the athletes. The Games obviously have value, or else the top athletes in Australia and the Commonwealth wouldn’t bother competing. Until that point, if and when it happens, I’m more than happy to enjoy the decent sport that comes out of the Comm Games every four years.

    • Joan says:

      09:24am | 10/10/10

      What an old sourpuss- one of the sneering chattering class- sneer as much as you like at individual achievements- bet you can hardly get off your bum to walk round the block. No one equates Commonweath games with Olympic—- they never have. Commonwealth Games allows Australian sports people to come togther peform for Australia as a unit, a dress rehearsal for the Olympics. Beating the World record can happen anywhere at anytime…don’t need the Olympics for that . How many people actually watch or take interest in any other atheletic or swimming events outside Olympics?

    • Lady Fong says:

      09:50am | 10/10/10

      ‘share no common wealth, preferential trade arrangements, military alliances or anything else much, aside from fast fading history as subjugated colonies’...these are your most telling words. With the huge population that makes up the Commonwealth, one would think that the head of the Commonwealth, the Queen[aka Britain] would place more importance on the grouping. Such wasted opportunities for all manner of activity. Imagine apart from sharing a past of subjugation, ‘we’ all speak, read, write English…a huge hurdle has been removed. Perhaps we should wake up to the many advantages of the Commonwealth before we throw it out. Close down the games as a waste of money for sure but it could engage in much else with advantage. The Commonwealth could take a page out of the French book which made all its colonies a part of France, with rights to send representation to Paris. If Britain had done the same perhaps the Empire would be alive and well and living in the 21C. Mind you the US extracted independence of all the colonies before they would join WWII.

    • Scot says:

      02:45pm | 10/10/10

      Lady Fong. The “Empire” as you sat is live and well and the French, German, Spanish, Turkish, Greeks, Romans and Portuguese “Empires” died years ago and look at the state of them now, globally versus the “Empire” of the British? And lest look at Asia and the Unification of China a long time ago. the waring tribes and the building and destruction of states and “Empires”. Even the Americans with New Mexico and the California, which was part of Spain and Mexico taken by the Americans and the US Sth being French. Interesting politics you have?

    • Steve Putnam says:

      03:27pm | 10/10/10

      Stuff and nonense! That was the point that stuck with everyone in Australia and New Zealand when the French were doing their nuclear testing at Bikini Atoll. The testing site was called a ‘French External Territory’ but it was never allowed representation in the Chambre du Deputes. I suggest you Google ‘Algeria’ or ‘Vietnam’ if you seriously think the French were better at de-colonisation than the British.

    • marley says:

      06:52pm | 10/10/10

      @LadyFong - not sure what you’re trying to say here.  If you think the French made all their colonies a part of France, you’re mistaken - so far as I know, Algeria is an independent country, as is Cote d’Ivoire and any of the others I can think of.  No votes in the National Assembly for them.  And as to the US extracting extracting independence of all the colonies before they would join WWII - well, some of those colonies were already independent, and all of them joined WWII well before the US did.

      @ Scot - haven’t a clue what you’re trying to say, but anyone who thinks the American south is “French” is seriously mistaken. Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi? Not exactly havens of the croissant and the baton.  True, Louisiana has it’s “cajuns” (actually descendents of Acadians from Nova Scotia) but that’s about it.

    • Amy says:

      09:53am | 10/10/10

      So, because we always win, we shouldn’t even bother having the competition?  The Commonwealth Games is valuable for our athletes.  It helps them train and gives them valuable international competition experience, it’s an advantage for us to have when it comes to the Olympics. 

      Besides, the Commonwealth Games is one of the only competitions in which Elite Athletes with Disabilities have their races alongside their able bodied counterparts on an international stage.  It’s a really important opportunity for them which they otherwise do not get to experience outside of the Paralympics (which, again, is a competition in which they are separated from their able bodied peers and simply does not get the same emphasis in news coverage or the 6 channel dedicated coverage). 

      Besides, any time we beat England at anything is a serious cause for celebration….

    • fairsfair says:

      10:07am | 10/10/10

      Yep, you know it is a has been because Anna Bligh is spending copious amounts of money trying to secure it for the Gold Coast. There is one person behind the curve if ever I have seen one.

      I think it is just unnecessary on so many levels. Oh and the TV coverage is abismal. Commentators crossing to commentators. I think it is a good thing that CH10 only secure the rights for mid season AFL, the US Baseball and D grade Mexican Handball comp.

    • Scot says:

      10:36am | 10/10/10

      Ross Nielson. So I guess the Asian Games to be held in China next month will also be a non event for Australians as well. Like the Girl Guides and Boy Scouts have become irrelevant. You have missed the point completely for why these games where started in the first place. For the same reason that the Olympic Games where started. It was to bring all these diverse nations together and show their prowess. So I guess Cricket is also a non event, tell that the countries that follow it avidly. Like all the WORLD games in America that are just for the US, and no where else, I would could that elitist. Some people are just do not get it. They are just beating a drum for politics and not sport which by the way has helped many athletes get out of poverty? Like 16 years of NSW Labor now a third world state.

    • Anjuli says:

      10:42am | 10/10/10

      You could well be right ,but it is still a competition non the less,where our athletes can get in some competitive swimming before the best show on earth.

    • nosthow says:

      11:17am | 10/10/10

      Even though I am a Republican I think QE2 has done such a good job perhaps we should continue with these games whilst she reigns. After QE2 well lets make changes then.

    • iansand says:

      08:20pm | 10/10/10

      What does a ship have to do with it?

    • Elphaba says:

      11:56am | 10/10/10

      *Yawn*

      Here’s an idea - why not just not watch it?

    • Dr Dog says:

      03:25pm | 11/10/10

      Because I keep forgetting and try to watch the Simpsons.

    • Vicki PS says:

      01:51pm | 10/10/10

      Questioning the value and relevance of the Commonwealth Games fails to address the fundamental question—why does Australia continue to pour huge amounts of money and effort into any professional sport?

      Whether or not the Commonwealth Games competition is under the mark in world terms isn’t the point.  We should be asking whether the Olympics, the football World Cup or any other world competitions matter at all for the majority of Australians.  These competitions allow an obscene number of officials, organisers, minders and minor functionaries to make a career out of sucking the tit of the sports cash cow, but do the careers of elite sportsmen and -women really add anything to the common weal?

      We need to be more interested in bread than circuses.  Withdraw all government funding from professional sports and let these so-called elite competitions, and the careers of the competitors, float or sink on their own commercial merits, supported directly by the $$ of whatever portion of the public gives a damn.

    • marley says:

      06:48pm | 11/10/10

      I agree 100%.  I have no problem with our tax dollars going to fund community sports facilities and even junior athletes, but damned if I know why I should subsidize the pros.  And if you can’t make enough money on the B hurdles circuit or in short course swimming or second-tier cycling, well fine, accept that sports is a pastime, not a job.  Yeah, Australia won’t get as many medals as in the past.  I’d rather see the money going to training doctors than training wrestlers.

    • San Simeon says:

      02:00pm | 10/10/10

      Hey Ross - If the games allow a load of second rate athletes, and a second rate nation, to feel good.  What is the harm?

      Even if the event pisses off a third rate journalist….

    • Richard says:

      02:36pm | 10/10/10

      Well you certainly started a trend Tors by calling the commonwealth games an “anachronism”.

      Have to say though that I disagree: its not an anachronism at all. But I can see how all the frothing-at-the-mouth republicans with an instinctual loathing for anything connected to the “Motherland” could be inclined to think so.

      But instead of expressing your anger at a harmless sports carnival, which provides Australian athletes with a valuable taste of international competition, Indians a chance to showcase their great capital city to millions of foreigners, and sports fans a chance for some mildly interesting televisual entertainment; why don’t you just come out and say what’s really on your mind:-

      You hate our history and our culture and anything that reminds you of our anglo-centric heritage.

      You hate the fact that the commonwealth is comprised of the freest, most vibrant and transparent democracies in the world.

      While other citizens of other countries that aren’t part of the commonwealth suffer under brutal human-rights depriving one-party dictatorships (like China) or socialist regimes with failed economies (like Venezuela), you hate the fact that countries of the former British Empire are now beacons for enlightenment, progress and prosperity.

      And you hate it that we celebrate these facts every four years.

    • Sean Williams says:

      01:50am | 11/10/10

      Well said Richard. I have every sympathy with Australians who want a republic, though I take issue with the sneering anti-British rhetoric that goes along with it sometimes (as if the current residents of the modern United Kingdom are somehow to blame for the fact that you have a foreign head of state). However, bashing the Commonwealth is a bit much. It’s not so much cultural cringe as cultural self-hatred.

      “formerly the Empire Games, before that, even more accurately, the British Empire Games” - well yes, of course, what did you expect it to mean? the Roman Empire Games? By the dramatic introduction of the dreaded word “British” are you hoping to shock your readers into open revolt?

      I’m sorry Aussies, but no matter how much you wish it were different you can’t change your history. You are a former British penal colony and subsequent dominion. You’re not America, with no great war of independence against the mother country to get misty eyed over. Face reality and get on with life, it’s far too short to get all angsty about something like the Commonwealth Games for goodness sake.

    • David says:

      01:12pm | 11/10/10

      Nigeria, Sri Lanka and Pakistan are beacons of enlightenment, progress and prosperity?

      Take off those rose-coloured glasses sir, and have a look at ALL the nations competing, not just Australia and England.

    • Dr Dog says:

      03:33pm | 11/10/10

      I am a frothing at the mouth republican with an instinctive loathing for anything to do with the motherland and even I don’t think the Commonwealth Games are anachronistic. In fact can’t see what they have to do with spiders at all.

      I do have to say Richard that I don’t see much about the Commonwealth Games that celebrates democracy or transparency. It seems to have more to do with maintaining our misplaced sense of superiority, clearly something that you, like most Monarchists, are very comfortable with.

    • Likes Joining Dots says:

      03:44pm | 10/10/10

      Ross, you are quite right - “The whole thing is screamingly absurd”.  Any sports event is absurd when you think about it, but it does not make it bad.

      Round this way,  East Suburbia is thrashing North Suburbia - are you going to bag the under 13 netball team next?

    • Eric says:

      04:18pm | 10/10/10

      But the Empire is so cool! Just think of Darth Vader entering the scene to the tune of the Imperial march. It just doesn’t get more awesome than that.

    • Lousia says:

      05:30pm | 10/10/10

      OK then - lets just ban all sport. I really wouldn’t mind not having football taking up so much time on TV. Bunch of men with thick necks - bunch of thick people watching.

    • Muttley says:

      01:43pm | 11/10/10

      Enjoy generalising? I enjoy football and i am willing to wager my IQ is higher than yours.

    • Geoff says:

      06:52pm | 10/10/10

      Don’t stop at the Commonwealth games, the Olympics should be abolished as well. What a ridiculous waste of time and money these events are. They serve only to empty the treasury to the satisfaction of the corrupt and the ego’s of a handful of athletes. I am so bored of hearing from self obsessed athletes that seem to equate their mind numbingly pathetic personal achievement at being one-one thousandth of a second quicker than someone else, with the discovery of penicillin or parting of the waters.

    • Max Vaunted says:

      01:59pm | 11/10/10

      Hear hear Geoff. Our spoilt, pampered athletes should pay their own way or don’t compete at all. And while we’re at it, lets put the kibosh on state sponsored fireworks too. It makes me sick to see tax money literally going up in smoke (ooh ahh look at that) while less fortunate Australians sleep under bridges in abject poverty and ill health.

    • Seth Brundle says:

      04:05pm | 11/10/10

      Any Australian who excels in any way should be cut down to size.  It’s the Australian way!

    • PeterinBrisbane says:

      07:12pm | 10/10/10

      Since when did someone have to be the majority to be relevant.  What a juvenile attitude!

    • The Badger says:

      10:13am | 11/10/10

      Just look at regional Australia. Relevant or not?

    • steveo says:

      10:48pm | 10/10/10

      yes, it’s time to move on. However, even when we become a republic I can see us still going to these blooming Games to win cheap medals and make us feel good about ourselves.
      The gleeful opportunity to trounce the Poms is about their only saving grace.
      The Indian experience may be a catalyst to stopping this nonsense once for all.

    • Gregg says:

      11:38pm | 10/10/10

      Ross, a few of your words are very telling or at least I found it so for ” Then if one of our athletes wins a medal, I will be first on my feet cheering and truly proud. ”
      Is winning everything Ross?
      Or do you not feel that there could be some spirit in competing, no matter what the level.
      I must agree the empty seats in the Delhi stadiums and the absence of road event crowds is dissappointing, but they’re other issues and the concept of bigger monkeys to police smaller monkeys is novel.
      Maybe that’s all we need instead of Tasers.

      Did you ever compete at sports Ross? or did it just get on your wick that there was always someone better?

    • Get a Life says:

      07:08am | 11/10/10

      I would rather watch a Schools Sports Day than the Commonwealth Games any day or night.

    • Average Joe says:

      08:48am | 11/10/10

      The Comm Games are great. So what if Australia and England tend to dominate the medals tally…it’s about the sporting competition and participation and the chance to see elite athletes from all continents trying their guts out. I don’t think Geoff Huegill shed a tear during the medal presentation because it wasn’t an Olympic medal eh?
      Whilst Delhi may have had its issues, I recall the vibe that permeated Melbourne in 2006 - it was absolutely fantastic and anyone attending the competition would have come away happy.
      If the Gold Coast get the 2018 Games - I’ll be going there to enjoy the experience again.

    • Bruce Clough says:

      09:54am | 11/10/10

      It should be called the Conwealth games as India is going to be the big loser out ot this. To take money out of a poor society in the hope that the country will look big on the world stage of sport was a delusion as is any Australian who thinks Gold medals are a barometer of sporting talent.

    • marley says:

      06:43pm | 11/10/10

      Ummm, just to be clear - are you saying the Indians aren’t capable of making their own informed decisions about what they do and do not wish to finance?  No one conned them.  They’re a pretty sophisticated society, after all, and if they choose to blow funds on a Games,  that’s their right.  Just like it was Australia’s right to blow money on the Olympics.

    • Onlooker says:

      10:37am | 11/10/10

      Does anyone else think that professional sports is totally boring? Let them compete by all means, but why should they expect to earn a living from it? Sport should be a hobby, a recreational activity, not a gold medal obsessive-compulsive disorder. Remember when swimmers retired when they were teenagers because they were bored? Now they stay in it for the money. Bring back shamateurism!

    • Mike t says:

      12:03pm | 11/10/10

      I do agree the games are looking tired and are in need of a revamp. However your logic that they should be halted due to exclusion of too many athletes is extremly floored. Almost every sporting event in the world excludes the majoity of people, but that hardly makes them irelevant or demands that they be ceased.

      My cosuins sports carnival only allowed 35 kids to compete, whoudl they be be cancelled becasue of the 13 other billion kids that were not allowed entry. Ok thats a far fetched example so lets try one a little more realistic….. what about the European athlectic camps, the american superbowl, the Ryder cup etc….. all of these are fantastic events open to a small percentage of the athletes that compete in that particualr sport.

      Am happy to debate the relevance of the games, but you will have to come up with a better reason for dropping the event then what you have come up with.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      03:09pm | 11/10/10

      Competition is better than training though, even if they are not on the level you want to beat - practicing against athletes who are not your training partnetrs must have some value.

      A game against a weak side is better than a scratch match

    • Jordan says:

      08:48pm | 11/10/10

      Oh, do shut up.

      I know you’re a fun-hater and all that, but can you please fall of the “I hate the CWG for no good reason” bandwagon? It’s getting pretty boring. Believe it or not, but a large section of athletes who go to the CWG actually enjoy it and enjoy winning some medals, “inferior” or not. It’s fun. Get over it and move on to your next target to whine about unnecessarily.

    • Cassio says:

      12:07am | 12/10/10

      You really shouldn’t mention the Ottomans, it’ll just confuse people.

    • Bill Oddly says:

      09:52am | 14/10/10

      God save our August Bank Holiday Island King,
      Long live our August Bank Holiday Island King,
      God bless our August Bank Holiday Island King…

      As sung by the Goodies- who said it all about irrelevance of the Commonwealth Games in 1971.

      Well done Ross- 39 years later you manage to make the same point, but without the wit…...or singing.

    • Julio says:

      11:20am | 07/02/12

      India lost a gdolen occasion to shine in the world stageBut just also watch where some comments come from: Pakistan, for instance, the world's head quarters of terrorism, not capable to help one third of it's population still under water!

    • Danut says:

      12:43pm | 10/02/12

      ok umm what!!!!! Gross, dugnistisg, foul, embarassing…..need I say more yuck I feel dirty now hahahaHave a great weekend Ryan!!!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter