Australians are inspired by the great mirror fields of solar energy in California and Nevada.  That vision is possible in Australia.  But it is a vision now at risk.

Labor's hot air means renewables such as wind farming are even further off being realised.

For over a year now, the government has delayed renewable energy legislation which would establish a 20% renewable energy target by 2020.  We have an end date but not a start date.

The renewable energy target was a promise made back in 2007.  Yet, here we are in the second half of 2009 without any debate on the legislation yet. 

The delay since the promises has gone on for so long, most people at home have just about forgotten about it.  But not the renewables industry.  They are puzzled and disappointed, angry and frustrated.

The renewable energy target would stimulate the creation of jobs and investment in the visionary solar, geothermal, wave, tidal and wind projects of the future.

Big projects.  Spectacular in their dimension and outlook.  Important building blocks in a renewable energy future in Australia.

The target would also allow the solar panel market to restart.  It stopped in June this year when the government guillotined the Coalition’s $8,000 solar panel rebate.

Thousands of Australian are still fuming after the pandemonium of waking up to find they had eight hours to get weeks of paperwork in or face paying thousands more to go solar.

A new scheme – paying less – was promised.  But that’s waiting for the new legislation to be introduced and passed.

But now here we are, faced with the prospect of renewable energy legislation being held hostage by the government.

It has still not been brought before the House of Representatives for debate – and this is a House which the government controls the numbers.

What’s worse, is that passage of the renewable energy legislation was made conditional upon passage of the government’s emissions trading plans.

But those plans have now been defeated in the Senate.

That means we are unlikely to see the legislation again for another three months.  And because the renewable energy legislation has been tied to the ETS getting up, that means both sets of bills will lie in the shadows of the ministerial wing until near-on the end of the year.

How can this be?  How can good legislation be held captive by bad legislation?

The school bully has the head prefect cornered behind the toilet block and there is no way out.

But it should never have come to this.  Renewable energy should not be the hostage of other ills.

We need certainty for our renewable future, for solar, for wind, for tidal and for the other great renewable energy projects.

In the spirit of bipartisanship, we want to break the shackles from the renewable energy target and pass the bill next week.

There is too little bipartisanship in parliament.  I am willing to meet with any member of the government, resolve the legislation, and help to pass a 20% renewable energy target next week.

I think the government now knows that the current situation is not tenable.  Its position is just not sustainable.

Now that the emissions trading legislation has been sent back to the drawing board, I think the government will pretty quickly focus on what is at stake here.

Australians rightly dream of using our endless solar and tidal resources. 

Just perhaps we can use this vision of a renewable Australia as the basis for overdue negotiations and bipartisanship.

Most commented

13 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Ouivuwah says:

      07:09pm | 13/08/09

      Gregory, a few pointers…
      1 AGW is a fallacy
      2 ‘Renewables’ represent a deadweight loss on the economy (and tell us what sort of chemicals go into a solar panel, eh?)
      3 The Liberal Party is the conservative side of politics (ie What are you doing there?)

    • Philip Gomes says:

      07:31pm | 13/08/09

      Your party has no policy Greg, it’s dithered for years, parliamentary members meet with known climate change deniers - people who peddle in lies and disinformation and who believe that the science is a massive conspiracy to kill capitalism.

      One of your denialist Senators flipped the Climate Change minister the bird today.

      I don’t like the proposed scheme, I don’t think polluters should be cut any slack. In fact I’d prefer a straight out tax not a market. Pay it or hit the road. And we need to kill the coal industry.

      But despite what I think, I also know that we have to start somewhere. That somewhere is now with the Govt’s plan if your party is unable to articulate and bring an agreed policy to parliament with which to field amendments.

      If this isn’t done then all of your actions only add up to yet more disengenious delay.

      And yes, I know all this is a Labor Party talking point, but it’s one I believe is a compelling one.

    • J says:

      08:19pm | 13/08/09

      Renewable energy needs to be taken seriously as the only viable alternative to our current addiction to heavy polluting coal. I urge anybody who agrees to get on board with GetUp’s latest campaign: https://www.getup.org.au/campaign/ReEnergise&id=705

    • glengyron says:

      09:25pm | 13/08/09

      Is this satire?

      I can’t help but feel this is all a day late and a draft amendment short…

    • Pricey says:

      09:44pm | 13/08/09

      Time for bipartisanship on climate change…..... That’s a new idea. Ring up KRudd and share your ingenius idea!

    • Dennis says:

      09:48pm | 13/08/09

      The legislation will go thru as the libs will backflip like they did on alcopops—you guys certainly know how to back your selves into a corner.The libs are so disorganised and no policies at all—-how remarkable.Its all about grand standing for the liberal party—they attack everything the govt does.The next election will be a masacre and many libs will loose their seats—then the govt can get on what they were elected to do.It will be great to see fielding go to.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:55pm | 13/08/09

      Nuclear Power generation is a much more viable option.

    • Bruce says:

      11:02pm | 13/08/09

      Unfortunately, there is no, or very little bipartisahip in politics. Its usually seen as a sign of political weakness. You know that when one leader of a political party calls for a bipartisan approach to a problem, the politician is usually playing games. This is exactly what is happening in the parliament at the moment. You can almost bet what will happen - Both sides of parliament will “beat their hairy chests” telling us each side does not know what they are talking about and that their approach is the right one. Then they will sit down amend the bill to each others satisfaction and then claim that their party has won the day. Boring guys, its been done before, yawn!!

    • Eric says:

      07:14am | 14/08/09

      I’d like to see bipartisanship on a practical, proven alternative—like nuclear power generation.

    • eag says:

      08:20am | 14/08/09

      lets see legislation so that all factories and businesses provide their own power needs usig solar.Lets encourage less domestic wastage of power and see where we stand.

    • Simon Smith says:

      09:23am | 14/08/09

      Ouivuwah I can’t believe you have such a short sighted and badly informed view on this issue.  AGW is not a fallacy - it’s a fact.  And renewables are not a dead weight.  Policy direction is what makes or breaks any initiative and until the policy supports renewables it is always going to be difficult.

      Krud (sic) and co. have routinely demonstrated they have absolutely no interest in pushing renewables as an alternative or the RET legilsation would have been delinked from the CPRS long ago.  European countries such as Denmark, Sweden and more importantly Germany have shown that policy drives advancement and their take-up of renewable energy has been nothing short of miraculous.  Particularly in Germany where even ten years ago there was a vast reliance on coal-derived energy, which has now been largely subsumed by renewables.  It took guts and determination to see that change - something which is blatantly lacking in the current administration.

      The Rudd government at present looks like a small child who takes his ball home when he’s not invited to play.  Get over yourselves and do what you were elected to do - govern for the people of Australia.

    • Joe says:

      12:50pm | 14/08/09

      Rudd is all about politics on this issue. He just wants to use this as a wedge issue against the Liberal party, and the media lap it up.

      The greens will bag him but ALWAYS give him their preferences anyway. Howard could have closed down all industry and the greens would still say he wasn’t doing enough.

      (PS AGW is a con - just a new industry for parasitic people to suck money from)

    • Jim Fletcher says:

      02:23pm | 14/08/09

      Those in favour of greater spending in the renewable energy area, might care to look at the examples of countries who have done just that.

      Spain appears to be the current darling, and at present Spain has the highest unemployment figures, and the highest cost of electricily in Europe.

      One comment mentioned Denmark - recently Terrt McCrann reported that Denmark get’s away with a high percentage of wind powered generators because for a the considerable amount of time when insufficient power is generated they import power from Germany, Sweden, and, Norway - much of which is neuclear powered.

      Sadly bypartinanship in this debate, given that both sides are mainly inrterested in percieved public opinion, will only lead to a flawed outcome.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter