If you don’t want to be ripped off this weekend, don’t watch Clash of the Titans or Alice in Wonderland in 3D.

Both films were shot ‘flat’ – two-dimensionally – and converted to 3D after the fact, an unsatisfactory process known as ‘up-conversion’ or ‘dimensionalising’.

If you’ve already watched Alice or Titans in 3D – and paid the premium 3D ticket price for the experience, thank you very much – you’ll know what I’m talking about.

The images don’t hold a genuine depth, as they did in Avatar or other 3D films shot with two lenses in order to mimic human vision.

Instead, each frame of these films was painstakingly etched into different planes. In Titans for example, a closeup of star Sam Worthington would be etched to create one plane, those rocks behind him would be etched into another, the background becomes another plane and so on…

Massive computers then separate the planes for a phony 3D effect more like a pop-up book for kids than a top-tier blockbuster worth a premium ticket price.

It’s uncomfortable to watch, distracts from the story and parts you with your cash without providing a benefit. No wonder Hollywood has fallen head-over-heels in love with the process.

And speaking of Hollywood, they’ve already won this round. Last weekend Titans took $7.8million here to set an Easter box-office record. Considering almost half of its sessions were in 3D, the extra $3 for a 3D ticket no doubt pushed it over the edge. Alice also broke sales records.

To make matters worse, Titans was shot and cut to be viewed two-dimensionally, which means certain lenses were used to emphasise the action and the editing rhythms were set to make the film play smoothly.

Much of that planning went out the window with up-conversion: the wedged-in 3D effect meddles with the film’s photography and the pace of the cutting is inappropriate for 3D projection, where your eyes need time to refocus between shots.

Alice in Wonderland fares slightly better because it was designed from the get-go as a 3D up-conversion… but the depth effect is still lousy and the ticket price is still high!

Dimensionalised versions of Terminator 2: Judgement Day and The Matrix are rumoured to be in the pipeline, with Hollywood likely to continue up-converting new releases as long as it makes business sense (it currently costs about US$8million to mangle a film into 3D at the last minute).

This up-conversion nonsense is a worry because genuine 3D is kind of a big deal. Avatar’s a knockout and top-end animated films such as Coraline and Up look great in the crisp new HD process.

Add to the mix imminent 3D sporting broadcasts and glassless 3D for mobile screens and it’s unfair not to label it a revolution.

Sure it might not be an artistic revolution on the scale of the early 1400s Renaissance artists who first painted in depth (Medieval art is exclusively 2D… true!), but the fact that the technology is so quickly being exploited financially with little regard for the quality of the final product is a problem.

Most troubling is that many cinemas around Australia are now ONLY playing the 3D versions of Titans and Alice, which means consumers aren’t even able to queue up and – forewarned by thepunch.com.au – go with the cheaper, better 2D option.

Most commented

26 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Liz says:

      08:00am | 09/04/10

      Who cares when you’re having fun?

    • Mr Pastry says:

      08:24am | 09/04/10

      This cheapscate band waggon jumping is predictable as the latest 3D format has proved a popular premium priced product (apologies for the accidental illiteration). Genuine stereoscopic 3D allows us to see form as well as scene depth (look at an object 400mm infront of your face, view it with one eye then the other and see the difference - particularly noticable with faces).  Films need to be marked “Filmed in 3D”, “genuine stereo 3D” or “Full S3D”  to avoid us beiing ripped off.  It would be a shame to miss the good product due to the disappointment caused by the ripoffs as the current cinema technology is sensational. My favourite of the new batch being “Up” which at times is breathtaking and worthy of the extra cost. Avatar is OK but the mainstream filmakers need to learn to edit 3D better, the trend in 2D films for fast scene cuts does not work in 3D, as scenes need to be savoured by the brain to immerse fully itself.  It will probably be a few years before the first 3d specific film crews are working in the mainstream.
      Watch out in future for Hollywood to insert a couple of 3D scenes into a 2D film in order to get it a 3D label at minimal cost (Avatar gets away with some 2D scenes but it is acceptable).

      For anyone who has been turned onto 3D recently:
      -  Hold off buying any flat screen as 3D TVs start arriving shortly into Australia.
      -  Don’t forget OmniMax theatres have been showing 3D short films for many years, the best is NASAs effort which is the nearest you get to being in space and is particularly spooky at times as you see some of the astronauts who died in the Challenger. 
      -  The Soccer World Cup in South Africa will have 26 matches filmed in 3D, sport in 3D is better than being there.
      -  ESPN is gearing up with multiple S3D channels for live sport. 
      -  Most Computer Games can be played in S3D with the use of shutter glasses (the only way to play).

      My apologies for being a S3D bore.

    • Simon the pieman says:

      09:56am | 09/04/10

      Whatever the 3D it can never save a bad script and I have watched old fuzzy black and white films that are superior to Avatar in storyline, which always seems to be the first casualty of new film technology.  Having said that, I enjoyed Pixars UP in 3D and the film definately benefited, but they are the most creative film makers around.  Once the live shoots can get a story going, the 3D will be worth it.  BTW I have noticed the live 3D requires you to follow the focus of the camera but the computer generated films do not, so you can wonder around the screen as you please.

    • AdamC says:

      09:08am | 09/04/10

      I have no interest in Clash of the Titans (looks like a remake of a campy romp that has watched Gladiator too many times) but have seen Alice. I quite enjooyed it, but found, where the visuals and style were concerned, it suffered greatly in comparison to Avatar. So I am not surprised, then, that it was done as a patch-together job.

      Wonderland wasn’t so wonderful, more like textureless, wash-out and grey.

    • Amanda says:

      09:05am | 09/04/10

      Clash of the Titans was crap. Total crap. Was it because I was watching it in 3D? It could have been! It did seem so jerky and the action scenes were hard to follow - especially all that sword waving and jumping around. Actually, no, it was the dialogue. Any chances of them up-converting crappy lines, like ``Don’t become one of them’’ (a god); or ``I want to do it as a man’‘. Can 3D inject some actual life into the crappy writing? Please?!?

    • Sarah says:

      09:08am | 09/04/10

      Completely agree.
      $42 for 2 tickets to Alice in 3D was a $%^&$ joke. Combine that with dinner and everything and you’re looking at a bloody expensive night out.
      No wonder I get films off the net rather than pay exorbitant rip-off prices for a rubbish product.

    • Anna says:

      11:03am | 09/04/10

      Or you know, you could just not watch them if they are so rubbish!

      I saw Clash in 3D, not realising until I saw it that it had been obviously 3Ded in post-production. What’s the point of making something look slightly in front of its background? At my local cinema the 3D is about twice the cost of a normal ticket, but that still only brought it to $11, which is still cheaper than el-Bircho et al for a regular movie.
      But I did see Journey to the Centre of the Earth in 3D and it was actually done well - so too was The Final Destination - well, as far as #D goes.

    • Damien says:

      10:28am | 09/04/10

      Personally, I think going to the movies in general is a rip-off. Even Tight-Arsed Tuesday isn’t so tight anymore…

      I find it disgusting that cinemas are now choosing to deny the public the choice to see these films in 2D or 3D. Mind you, what’s another $3 from the pockets of a mindless population that just want to jump on whatever bandwagon is trundling on by at the time?

    • Sarah says:

      10:49am | 09/04/10

      I was thinking ‘but I wasn’t given the option to watch Alice in Wonderland in 2D’, then I read your last line. And it is unfair, to make us pay more for something we don’t necesarily want. Avatar was the same. The only way the local GU, or Event Cinemas now (wank) showed it in 2D was in Gold Class! Which was still more expensive than 3D in a regular cinema! And then to top off the rudeness I saw it in the smallest cinema in the complex. I mean really! Not taking away from Avatar as a great 3D film in any way, but it is galling to not even be given a choice.
      Alice in Wonderland, I’m not sure would’ve been any better in 2D though, what a waste of time that was

    • Reeko says:

      10:44am | 09/04/10

      I saw CoT not knowing about this and I did walk out telling my mate that the movie did seem flat visually, but at the time I thought it was me getting used to 3D. 

      Avatar stood out as real value, constantly hitting you with tremendous depth or in ur face action, to me it was a real visual feast though with Cot I did feel slightly touched and now I know why.

      Thanks editor, next time ill look for you info before i blow my doe

    • stephen says:

      12:31pm | 09/04/10

      I’m trying to find the original Clash on Blu-Ray (plus a few damn good Westerns i could think of), but no luck. Blu-Ray is really good enough for film-viewing. 3D won’t last. In 12 months time, it’ll be in selected cinemas only.

    • Robert Smissen of God's Own Country, Rural SA says:

      12:45pm | 09/04/10

      3-D is used instead of having a plot. Let’s face it, if your movie is strong enough you could get away with black & white.

    • H of SA says:

      01:32pm | 09/04/10

      Too right. I wonder when Hollywood will realise that it doesn’t matter how spectacularly you kill people - if the story isn’t strong enough for us to care about it then then the customer will be dissatisfied.

      People like stories. Write some engaging ones and the crowds will come.

    • John says:

      02:56pm | 09/04/10

      edit: 3-D is use instead of having a plot and is used to entertain kids (adults) smile

    • CCC says:

      01:01pm | 09/04/10

      Hate to say it but Alice was a bit of a letdown. Would have liked to see it in 2D. It’s weird these massive movies will probably be better on dvd. Get excited, rental stores!

    • Mr Subramanian says:

      01:42pm | 09/04/10

      Is this an advantage the animated films have over live action ones, because they can be rendered in 3D more easily? I noticed that they released Toy Story 1 & 2 in 3D again (although I missed them)...

    • Mr Pastry says:

      02:25pm | 09/04/10

      Yes, Toy story 1 and 2 were painstakingly re-rendered from the original data files, but this is a larger undertaking than the dimensionalising which just adds a bit of background depth.  The comments about inadequate story lines are true but this is the same with 2D and not an exclusive attribute of 3D.  Pixar have high production values that include knockout stories, because they play to kids, a car chase and a bit of celebrity cleavage is not enough, kids need a story.  Avatar tried but was a trial mixture of 3D CGI and live 3D dual camera work and 2D - great visuals but not a killer story.
      It will get better, would you go back to black and white TV? The broadcast of live events into 3D cinemas is the real application and potential money earner as the technology to stream dual HD video feeds over the internet is now available and in use.  Front row tickets to the world cup in your local multiplex anyone?

    • Sam Cleveland says:

      02:45pm | 09/04/10

      Hi Sub,
      Yep, animated films are so nice in 3D because filmmaker’s have more control over the image. You might have noticed the live action scenes in Avatar (on the base) weren’t quite as crisp as the CG stuff (the jungle sequences and so on).

      All the original picture elements of the first two Toy Stories were sitting around somewhere on a computer, which made it easy to split those films into genuine 3D images.

      They were great by the way! They played as a double bill and Pixar put a little 10 intermission sequence between the films, full of jokes and other little bits of nonsense.
      Great value entertainment from stylish operators!

    • JustAnotherGeek says:

      04:36pm | 09/04/10

      3D is a fad.
      It’s just like how the studio’s went crazy with CGI (Computer Generated Imagery) for their movies; George Lucas - one of the earliest creators of ‘Special Effects’ said they should never become the movie, or let it distract from the story. Yet, even he fell into that trap with the Star Wars remakes, and later the prequels.

      Now we have 3D movies. And soon 3D TV’s. It wont fly. It’ll be short lived; Already we struggle to find one of the many remotes in our lounge - who wants to add 3D glasses to that? And then, you need to have a set for EVERYONE who may visit and want to watch a movie. Or is it going to be “BYO-3DG” ?

      As with anything: Someone comes up with one ‘interesting’ / different idea, and then the mass falls head-over-heels in love, and everyone else develops their “Me-too” product to try capitalise on that.
      Sometimes you wish certain groups just wouldn’t try so hard.

    • Lee from WA says:

      05:35pm | 09/04/10

      It’d be good to know which ones are ‘up-dimensioned’ and which ones aren’t before I go and make my choice. Anyone know of any websites that will tell you this?

    • Dragon Fan says:

      12:29pm | 10/04/10

      Keep an eye on the Internet Movie Database.  They mentioned Clash would be released as 3D well after filming had finished.  I assume big budget movies are the likely targets to be post-production 3D’d.

    • Nino says:

      10:26am | 10/04/10

      Visually the most effective 3D film I have seen so far is “How to train your Dragon”.
      3D is the new flavour of the month, after the “Red” camera…Like all mediums 3D is only suitable for certain stories (Eg.:usually with a lot flying ugly birds or Dragons…Red…the bigger the better!..).3D films are the only way to attract people back to the cinema…until 3D TV arrives…

    • jim says:

      12:52am | 11/04/10

      3D on screens is equivalent to Cameras on the front of the phones to make video calls.

      After a few times, you’d realise what a rip off it is, and find the traditional media to be just as effective. Thats why the iPhone unlike other phones still don’t have a camera in the front, and they still sell better than other phones… despite negative reviews of missing camera in front.

    • Mr Pastry says:

      01:13pm | 11/04/10

      10% of ppl will be ripped off as 10% have no stereoscopic abilities.  Know who they are and don’t let them drive you anywhere.

    • MarkSpizer says:

      08:30pm | 02/05/10

      great post as usual!

    • outlet says:

      09:53am | 16/06/12

      I was very pleased to find this web-site.I wanted to thanks for your time for this wonderful read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you blog post. http://www.lovingguccishop.com

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter