Wondering how to take great holiday snaps? Ben Groundwater has tips from Richard I’Anson, professional photographer and author of Lonely Planet’s Guide to Travel Photography, on how to take the perfect pic.

Are you on the wrong side of the lens in your travel shots?

Except he’s forgotten the best tip on taking travel photos. Don’t. Put the camera down and go do something.

As Ben says, many travellers fancy themselves as photographers and “like to take the odd snap to show off to their friends back home”.

But it’s not the “odd snap”. It’s endless monotonous sunsets, sunrises, and blurred pics of the view from the train window, plane window and the local toilets. So many photos I wonder if they did anything on the trip other than press the shutter button.

There’s the scenery bore, usually a single traveller who takes endless shots of landscape and them standing in front of it, safe in the knowledge that their precious pictures are unsoiled by social interaction.

“This, this is a shot of a waterfall. And this is the same waterfall from a different spot. This is the waterfall with me in front of it. I always take two shots in case I close my eyes. No, I take three. Look, there I am. And here’s that waterfall again. Will you just look at all that water?”

Or the amnesiac bores who need to agree on the inconsequential details of what each shot is before they can move on.

“Oh this, this is that temple – John, was this the temple with the statues? It was? – We went to this temple on the – John, was it the third or the fifth day? You had that food poisoning on the third day, you had a runny bottom. I told you not to eat the salad. – We went on the third day. Look, there’s a statue.”

And that’s not counting the technical bores who tells you all about the lens they used for each shot, the food bores who insists on photographing every meal and the ego bore who is gurning out at you from each of their photos. All four hundred of them.

Back in the days of camera that used film, the bores were usually limited by their budget. They didn’t take 20 shots of the same thing – it cost too much to develop. Travellers had a good look, took a pic and went off to have some fun.

But thanks to digital cameras, people feel unfettered in how often they click. I’ve been shown twenty photos of the same waterfall. I’ve sat through countless hours of the Taj Mahal, the Grand Canyon and Amsterdam’s red light district.

And it’s not just saving them for later, some people want you stop having fun and squint at that screen right now. One bore tried to show me pictures of the Whitsundays when we were still in the Whitsundays and trying to enjoy the scenery.  I just said the screen was too hard to see.

But now Nikon have produced a camera with a projector, so bores can start show a slideshow on the spot. If I see someone coming towards me with that, I will be off and running before you can say “this, this is a picture of where we are right now”.

I’m not saying I won’t look at any photos, but I have a limit. Hand picked precious moments is one thing, the same shot from 16 angles is another. Much like your love life, I’m happy you enjoyed yourself, but I don’t to hear a complete play-by-play and flick through detailed pictures.

And, much like your love life, there comes a time to put the camera down and go have some fun yourself or people are going to think you’re a bit of a bore.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

34 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Photo Nerd says:

      08:26am | 02/03/10

      look while I tend to agree on some points, the fact of the matter is that photography particularly high end was expensive, to the point where a normal mortal couldn’t afford it….now the common man has the equipment, and can afford the travel as well, so his/her creative side ihas been unleashed…so as in the days of the old slide shows, if you don’t like it run…but don’t tell us not to take the shots, it’s too much fun….

    • jed says:

      10:06am | 02/03/10

      so his/her creative side ihas been unleashed

      i’ve seen some of these ‘creative sides’, there’s not much talent involved.

    • J says:

      09:24am | 02/03/10

      There are some places you can’t help photographing to death.  Ha Long Bay in Vietnam was one of them - and it was raining! 

      I have a friend whose an amateur photographer, and he sneers at my taking photos of landscapes/temples/on the back of a motorbike whilst he takes arty shots of people looking deep in thought.  It’s a bit wanky.  I love my digital camera - I can take several shots of something, and then get amongst the local colour knowing there’s a decent shot capturing what I experienced.

      It’s all about balance. grin

    • maree says:

      09:57am | 02/03/10

      I’m guilty of taking a lot of photos sometimes, but I totally agree about refraining from boring people to death with them!!
      For example, I may take many pics away on holiday, but will only put a handful of the best up on facebook, a lot are just for me & who I travelled with to keep.
      People upload albums on facebook with hundreds of photos, and I think they have missed the point of their travels, and managed to put people off seeing what they have been up to!

    • Sarah says:

      10:01am | 02/03/10

      Excellent… have never understood why people spend their holiday seeing things through a viewfinder.
      People are so busy taking photos to “capture the moment” that they don’t get to experience the moment in the first place. As if an 8x10 matte borderless print is going to equal experiencing something….
      I come back from 3-month trips with maybe 50 photos.. mainly of people/family… but a head full of memories and experiences.

    • Ferg says:

      10:05am | 02/03/10

      Ha - I think I’m all of these bores… have i shown you my Vietnam shots???

    • Rich says:

      10:07am | 02/03/10

      Your problem is entirely of your own making, you need to set boundaries on the people you know will show you 400 photos.

      Technology is not the issue here. In fact, if you look at what is now possible with technologies such a photosynth (http://photosynth.net/) you can see how even a mass of photos of the same thing, can be pretty cool.

    • iansand says:

      10:25am | 02/03/10

      Good photography has always been about what you discard.  The amateurs about whom you complain have not yet learned this.

    • Andy says:

      11:33am | 02/03/10

      Aha, don’t be giving away this secret.  People think I’m awesome because I show them only the really good ones. Not the 350 or more that I threw away to get them..

    • H of SA says:

      01:30pm | 03/03/10

      The Miles Davis approach to photography eh? (aka Cool School: Just the right amount of genius and nothing more) Sounds pretty good to me.

    • Peter says:

      04:21pm | 03/03/10

      Absolutely! If the great unwashed travelling masses ever learned about framing, composition and taking a travel tripod with you, they’d be amazed how good their shots would look. I discard around 99% of everything I take. Only keep the very best. It’s the only way to go.

    • Schmavo says:

      12:09pm | 02/03/10

      I’ve thought similarly for years. More fun having a holiday than showing people where I’ve been. Spent 6 weeks in Canada and the USA once and have about 40 photos altogether. Most of the time, I even forget to pack a camera. And seeing videographers with their camera rolling the whole time suggests they may be missing out on the experience.

    • MJC says:

      12:56pm | 02/03/10

      Ha. I took 2000 photos in SE Asia in 3 weeks.
      Of that 1000 were disposable.
      500 were flawless, I have processed them and keep them saved.
      100 I would print, but only for myself.  50 I would actually show and share with friends.
      25 are staggering enough to enlarge.

      The hit rate is good at 50%.
      Now tell me why couples on their wedding day need 500+ photos of themselves. No one wants to see them all. It’s OK, keeps my pockets lined for more holidays

    • David says:

      12:57pm | 02/03/10

      Get over yourself, you great turnip!

      Of course people enjoy taking photos of where they’ve been.

      My wife and I took over 1,500 photos when we walked the Kokoda Track recently.

      This doesn’t mean we didn’t do anything while there.  In fact, the highlight of our trip was spending time talking to locals, playing games with local kids, leanring about local history and culture, etc. 

      We’re still in touch with many of the friends we made on that trip.

      Your article is typical of the recent trend in this and other blogs, whereby someone passes off a very greneral moan or whinge about a (usually) unspecified class of people as informed opinion or editorial.

      Sure, some people like taking photos while travelling, some don’t.  Each to their own, and why do you care?

    • iansand says:

      01:16pm | 02/03/10

      It is actually about someone instructing the rest of the world how to enjoy themselves.  How dare people enjoy themselves in ways of which the writer diapproves?  Arrogant wanker.

    • Joe says:

      01:07pm | 02/03/10

      My suspicion is that there has never been a time when more photos have been taken or so few been viewed. So many photos that used to be put in albums, frames or shoe boxes, are not silently hidden deep within the photographer’s hard dive, seen only by the photographer and anyone who happens a glimpse of his screen saver.

    • stephen says:

      01:21pm | 02/03/10

      But that’s just the point, Sadhbh. Many people actually like to make art out of non-experience, where anyone can stand to one side and try to make something interesting out of what they see.
      It’s actually very difficult to take a good photograph. We use our sight a lot, and most of the images are meaningless. Photographers re-create that meaninglessness and their image is an adaptation of what we are familiar with. The difference between the 2 ‘familiars’ (ours and the photographers), is the ‘art’ aspect of the resultant image.
      I’ve seen some good shots taken by ‘happy snappers’ but it is rare. Most good photos are meticulously planned.

      Years ago I did part of a photo course at Ultimo TAFE (film component).
      To all budding pro’s it’s a first - rate school.

    • Kim says:

      04:22pm | 02/03/10

      Not always stephen.  My hubby is a live band photographer promoting live music in Brisbane and in saying this, none of his photos are planned let alone meticulously planned.  Most live band photographers usually have 1 great shot out of 10.  All these shots have to be done quickly as most bands insist on the “1st 3 songs only - no flash” rule.

      Of course, if you’re talking about landscapes/personal shots, then yes, some planning does come into it.

    • AFR says:

      01:27pm | 02/03/10

      1500 photos of Kokoda? of what exactly? And 2000 in SE Asia in 3 weeks? That’s almost 100 per day. Crazy stuff. Oh well, each to his own i suppose.

    • bella starkey says:

      01:38pm | 02/03/10

      My dad is one who loves “natural shots” this consists of pictures of people eating and people talking in groups, mostly showing the back of thier heads.

      He’ll put the photo’s from a holiday on a DVD and play it on the TV and we are not allowed to move until we fully appreciate that:
      a) his brother has a bald spot, as shown by the numerous photo’s of the back of his head.
      b) the water in vanuatu is like, really blue, as shown by 1700 photo’s on one boat ride
      or c) his mates look hillarious when they are eating.

      These days i use a disposable camera, I take a photo of some thing funny that i see or that people are doing occasionally and am super excited to get them back.

      Sure it costs a shitload but the suprise is completely worth it!

    • Sadhbh says:

      01:59pm | 02/03/10

      I’m laughing my head off here, think I have had to sit through that slide show a few times myself!

    • kelly says:

      01:40pm | 02/03/10

      A old friend of mine had a photo of himself walking the Kokoda track….It’s framed in his living room, and it is truly a great shot.
      Don’t think he needed 1499 other pictures of it though…..

    • iansand says:

      04:22pm | 02/03/10

      See my earlier point about discards.

    • Max says:

      01:43pm | 02/03/10

      Most people still use cheap point and shoot cameras.  Sure they’re much better than what we had 10 years ago - but they’re still far from print quality.

      The trick is that these photos are a memory aid.  You take the photos just to remember where you went and what you saw.  I have lots of photos of things that make no sense to other people - but they’re often little cultural quirks that I notice along the way so I try to photograph them; no use to anyone but me.

      The number of really good, print quality photos I’ve ever taken is probably in the tens - the rest are just memories.

    • dancan says:

      01:53pm | 02/03/10

      When I travelled for 11 months I took over 3000 photo’s.  But here’s the catch I take photo’s for me not you.  Out of those 3000 I may only show a quarter to other people, the rest are for me to look at when I reminisce.  That boring picture of a street corner reminds me of the lunch I had that day at a small cafĂ© with a cute waitress, that boring picture of a bus terminal reminds of the misunderstanding I had with the bus driver and we both started yelling at each other in different languages for no reason.  It makes me laugh thinking back on it now.  And next time I go on another 11 month trip I’ll take just as many photos.

    • MJC says:

      02:06pm | 02/03/10

      I’m surprised by some of the comments here.
      For the people that don’t understand it - give up. You just won’t. Not even if shown the pictures. I enjoy my holidays, but in each location I try to capture different elements . I don’t shoot all day on holidays, but 100 photos a day? That could take me 30 to 45 mins to shoot that little. 100 photos in a day is a small amount.
      On a location shoot, I could do 50 in 10 minutes.

    • Bob H says:

      02:07pm | 02/03/10

      Photos are for personal use only and it is a mistake to think anyone else is interested.  A bit like amateur dramatics, enjoyed by the players but friends and relatives should not be forced to sit down for long periods to endure someone elses hobby.  Imagine having to sit through someones photos of their amateur dramatic production.

    • Sadhbh says:

      02:50pm | 02/03/10

      ...I have actually had to sit through that, my tutor in college took us through her “showreel” of amatuer dramatics. Couldn’t walk out as she was one of the people grading me.
      This is the same woman who made us pretend to fellate poultry on stage through, so she may not be a good example of a sane human.

    • Sam Chowder says:

      06:36pm | 02/03/10

      @Sadhbh - felating poultry, ... thats foul ( ;-o)

    • foraggio says:

      04:16pm | 02/03/10

      “Put the camera down and go have some fun yourself”, you say. Are you not aware that for many people, taking photos is fun, especially in remote locations. Those of us with our eyes open like to record those moments, and share them, so don’t assume we’re missing out on anything.

      I’ve read a lot of nonsense in my time, and this is up there amognst the worst of it.

    • Amy says:

      04:22pm | 02/03/10

      Same rules could be applied to people and photos of their babies….

    • Jonathan says:

      06:02pm | 02/03/10

      I guess technology has ruined a lot of things:  amateur photographers can take millions of photos and insist that everyone admire their work.  then they put them on the internet for strangers to see as well.  So photography as an art has been literally devalued, in that the cost to produce shots is cheaper.

      The same goes for writing.  Back in the day, newspapers etc were a lot more picky about what was printed because newsprint was expensive and people paid to read the content.  Now we pay nothing to read articles written for free by amateurs who happen to have an opinion on something.

      To sum up:  just because you take photos doesn’t mean we want to see them.  And just because you can write doesn’t mean it should be published.

      Ironically, I’m now part of the problem, having contributed content for free to a free online newspaper.  Feel free to ignore.

    • Den says:

      06:58pm | 02/03/10

      A digital camera (no matter how many mega pixels it has) can not replace a good photographic eye and the ability to use composition.
      So its analogue for me, for as long as they still make film. When they dont make it anymore I will look at my printed photos and marvel at the technology we lost.

    • David says:

      09:11pm | 02/03/10

      I think you’re the problem.

      And the solution would be for you to stop associating yourself with so many bores (ie, the kind who insist on showing you their photos), rather than tell the rest of us what to do.

      Bore.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

TAbbott to fight PHI rebate cuts on behalf of 2.5 million to pay extra, but won't say what he'd do as PM. http://t.co/lXWpMXXF

Anthony Sharwood

Numerous workplace safety rules (no harness, fall arrest etc) broken in this pic of Roosters coach Brian Smith http://t.co/jx4PgtBs

Anthony Sharwood

Yo, mummy bloggers! Your expert input is required in this doozy of a child-rearing dilemma http://t.co/0JfOnCq1

Daniel Piotrowski

How we're getting ripped off at the ATM http://t.co/Vpu8DuHy

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Would you kill for a job?

Would you kill for a job?

Who would work in an abattoir? Most of us have done jobs we didn’t want to do because we needed…

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Parenting. It’s the new oneupmanship. Ah, how quaint the days now seem when parents could raise…

Hipsters with hip replacements

Hipsters with hip replacements

Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter