The first rule of calling a black arsehole a black arsehole is that only another black arsehole can call a black arsehole a black arsehole.

This should be a farewell handshake. Pic: Getty Images

The second rule of calling a black arsehole a black arsehole is that if a white arsehole calls a black arsehole a black arsehole, that white arsehole should be kicked very hard in exactly that location.

In short, Steve Williams, the glorified bouncer who carries other people’s sporting equipment for a living, should be bounced from the golf course for good for his comments about his former boss Tiger Woods in Shanghai last week.

Ah, but actually doing about that would require action, wouldn’t it. And the sport of golf is particularly adept at doing absolutely nothing in the face of controversy or crisis.

Remember the delightfully-named Martha Burk? She’s the rad fem who in 2002 took on Augusta National Golf Club, home of America’s prestigious Masters tournament, for its failure to admit female members.

Club chairman Hootie Johnson pretty much fended off Burk by doing nothing. He even compared his club to such single-sex organisations as the girl scouts, in order to protect his indefensibly sexist club policy. He probably even sold the journalists who bought that line some cookies.

The thing is, Johnson’s head in the pristine white bunker sand trick worked perfectly. Eventually, the issue just kind of fizzled out. Augusta National still admits only males. Seems those ostriches out Africa way aren’t as dumb as they seem.

So here we have the Australian Open about to start in Sydney this week – in a dazzling location beside the airport freeway which is sure to showcase the Harbour City’s wonders to the world.

And guess who’s in town? Steve Williams, of course, caddying for his new boss Adam Scott, the World Number 8 who won this tournament two years ago. Greg Norman is also around, no doubt primed to tell us what’s so right about his 11th wife and why she’s better than the other 10. Or are we up to 12 now?

And then there’s some dude called Tiger who also doesn’t mind the birdies, even if they hit him more often than he scores them nowadays.

No matter what happens out there at The Lakes Golf Club, course, all the talk will be on Tiger Woods and Steve Williams, who famously parted ways earlier this year after a decade and 13 Major wins together.

Williams had two little snipes at Woods after leaving. The first came when he won a tournament with Adam Scott (yes, Williams really does think “he” won it), and he said it was his best win ever. Oof! Take that, Tiger!

The other one came at a caddies’ do last week in China, where he called Tiger Woods a black arsehole. Williams said he thought the comments would go no further than the room, which really does underline how spectacularly well suited he is to an intellectually undemanding career in, say, nightclub bouncing.

Indeed, if you ever follow Williams around a golf course, you’ll see that crowd control is quite his thing. Look, he probably plucks a mean eight iron from the bag and polishes a sandy wedge or a grassy wood with impeccable attention to detail, but the fact is, Woods never employed him for any of that.

Williams is a big imposing Kiwi with long tanned legs and a mean grimace, which he uses as a weapon to ward off those who would wander too close. Sometimes he uses words too. He is, in effect, a human haka. Hi, I’m Steve. Come any closer and I’ll clock you.

How ironic that a bloke who has forged a career of preventing golfing patrons overstep boundaries should cross an unacceptable boundary himself. You don’t call someone a black arsehole unless it’s a racist slur. Just ask Nicky Winmar.

What to do, then, with Williams? Sack him of course. Problem is, Adam Scott is not the kind of guy to do anything bolder than lend his name to a new salmon pink argyle sweater.

Everything is so very, very Burberry in Scott’s world (or whatever his sponsor is now that the chavs have totally hijacked the Burberry brand and turned it into Brit-Bogan wear).

Scott is likeable. He once saved his Dad from drowning in the surf by running miles for help on a remote beach. True story. But Scott is also drab. Indeed, the whole sport of golf is drab to all but its most diehard followers.

Let’s face it. There’s only one reason golf has been in the headlines in the last year or so, and that’s sex and racism.

Aha, but now Adam Scott has the chance to be a hero. He can put golf in the headlines for a most excellent reason indeed. He can sack the schmuck who has long been rumoured to be New Zealand’s richest sportsman, even though he doesn’t actually play a sport himself.

Instead of being the raffish dude famous for hot tennis girlfriends and burning the pages of magazines with his smoulder, Adam Scott could be the man who slashes and burns Steve Williams.

Gee, but there’s just so much sand out there at The Lakes this week. All those bunkers, so much room to bury your head.

Twitter: @antsharwood

84 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Michael says:

      12:17pm | 07/11/11

      He didn’t call Tiger an arsehole because he was black, he described the colour of the arsehole that he thinks Tiger is, if you’re black and someone calls you black…SO WHAT YOU’RE BLACK.

      Yes that makes him a white arsehole, if you think he’s an arsehole.

    • gobsmack says:

      12:36pm | 07/11/11

      Yes, to clarify, he didn’t call Woods an arsehole.  He said he wanted to shove it (not sure what the “it” was) up Wood’s black arsehole.  However, I’m not sure that any hole has a colour.

    • Adam Diver says:

      12:50pm | 07/11/11

      @ gobsmack, that means this entire uproar is now out of context, unless wood’s has a different colour arsehole.

      @ Michael, I agree.

    • gobsmack says:

      02:10pm | 07/11/11

      Any place where the sun doesn’t shine (and is not otherwise illuminated by artificial light) will necessarily appear to be black.

    • Red says:

      12:25pm | 07/11/11

      Never been racially abused by a black person huh?

    • bella starkey says:

      12:25pm | 07/11/11

      F-k, golf is dull.

    • lee enfield says:

      12:34pm | 07/11/11

      Calling someone who is black,  a black asshole is not racist.  Black is not a race,  not all black people are from the same race.  Calling someone who is   black,  a black asshole is not racist,  as it is not implying or saying that the black asshole is inferior to another race based on perceived genetic traits.  Calling a black person a black asshole is no more racist then calling a blonde a blonde bimbo or blonde bitch,  or a red head a stupid ranga or a carrot top.  Name calling based on skin colour,  eye colour,  hair colour,  gendr,  or any other scientifically proven trait is not racist,  it is discrimination.  The calling of tiger woods a black asshole is not a racist remark,  it is a skin coloured discrimination remark.

    • fml says:

      03:29pm | 07/11/11

      what pray tell is a race then?

    • Debs says:

      06:45pm | 07/11/11

      The Melbourne Cup ... now thats a race ! But I can’t tell you the colour of the horse that won because that would be racist.

    • Hermano says:

      07:43am | 08/11/11

      Ffs Lee, seriously?  What a stupid argument.

    • fml says:

      10:14am | 08/11/11

      No Debs,

      It wouldnt, calling someone a black arsehole on the other hand is. No one would have bothered if he just called him an arsehole, most probably would of agreed with him and there wouldnt be such a fuss.

    • John A Neve says:

      11:10am | 08/11/11

      fml,
      Pray tell us who called Woods a “black asshole”?
      I think you have been reading too many posts, he was never called that,
      try getting your facts right.

    • fml says:

      11:31am | 08/11/11

      Ex Caddy even.

    • John A Neve says:

      01:28pm | 09/11/11

      fml,
      The link you posted does not cover what was said! So what was your purpose?
      I repeat his ex-caddy did not call Woods a “black asshole’ , but in fact told him to shove it up his black asshole.
      Please try to get your facts right.

    • Brian the white man says:

      12:44pm | 07/11/11

      What a stupid article you arsehole.

    • Bleary says:

      12:55pm | 07/11/11

      Got it in one Brian.
      Talk about white mans guilt from Sharwood.
      Sounds like Williams was just telling it like it is.
      Also I think that you will find that good caddies actually do a lot more than just carry the bag.Do you think they would be paid so much otherwise?

    • did you read it all? says:

      01:12pm | 07/11/11

      c’mon guys, remember reading comprehension in 6th class. No guilt here, he is talking about the sport of golf (yawn, a bit) and about how a caddie thinks he is pretty amazing because he used to hand clubs to a serioius sporting genious.

    • Coop says:

      06:10pm | 07/11/11

      Agree. Has Ant ever written an article with a positive to it?

      How is it that every single person mentioned here is depicted as an arsehole, a douche, too boring, plain stupid, or in some other way deficient.

    • Tim says:

      12:46pm | 07/11/11

      Steve Williams is a white arsehole.

      But that doesn’t mean that the premise of your article is in anyway correct.

      Well unless you’re of the opinion that only men can be sexist and only white people can be racist.

    • fairsfair says:

      01:00pm | 07/11/11

      Agreed Tim. I couldn’t cop him after he attempted to put the spotlight on himself a few months ago. I appreaciate the role of the caddy - but step off champ - you are not the player and get away from the camera.

      I love Ant - I have made that clear on many an occasion, but yeah… this is out of character. It is way longer than usual and seems a bit hysterical. I am unsure of the motivation behind it. Odd. Its a bit mountain out of molehill stuff Mr Sharwood.

    • John Smythe says:

      01:10pm | 07/11/11

      So, Ant should fire himself because he used a racial slur “white arsehole” then.

      That just made this article make sense….I think??

    • Tim says:

      12:51pm | 07/11/11

      Actually Ant,
      on re-reading your article i’ve come to the conclusion that either:
      a) You’re on your period OR
      b) Tiger Woods slept with your wife OR
      c) Steve Williams once didn’t let you into a nightclub.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      01:02pm | 07/11/11

      definitely a)

    • Tator says:

      01:25pm | 07/11/11

      Or d)  All of the above

    • Tim says:

      01:30pm | 07/11/11

      Dammit,
      I was ready to put money at Black Caviar odds on it being C.

    • Farken says:

      01:49pm | 07/11/11

      i think it was d) tiger woods or Steve Williams did not sleep with you"Anthony Sharwood”

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      04:22pm | 07/11/11

      actually in all seriousness, when i had “inside the ropes” access at the 2009 Australian masters, where Williams caddied for Woods, I was able to hear all the banter and did take a pretty hefty dislike to Williams. So closest to c) I guess.

    • Tim says:

      05:04pm | 07/11/11

      Haha Ant,
      I knew it.
      Having met Williams at that event, I would have to agree that he a knob with a massive ego but I don’t think he’s a racist.

    • david says:

      01:06pm | 07/11/11

      Are you saying that if you publicly call someone an arsehole, you should be sacked from your job?

    • Purple Arsehole says:

      04:03pm | 07/11/11

      No David

      Only if you colourised the Arsehole, then you should be sacked, you pink arsehole

    • marley says:

      01:07pm | 07/11/11

      Ah, guys, if Williams had just said he’d like to ram the six iron up Tigers ass, that would have been somewhat - ahem - short on class but not racist.  Wanting to ram it up Tiger’s black ass is a slightly different thing. 

      This is the second time in a couple of months that Williams has tried to make the golf story about himself and not about the golfers that pay his rather handsome wages.  Delusions of grandeur, methinks.  A longish spell caddying at his local course might do him a world of good.

    • Markus says:

      01:52pm | 07/11/11

      This is what has become the accepted ‘rule’ over the last 20 years or so when it comes to racial slurs, but the problem is that it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Never has.

      Williams is a tool. But he was a tool well before he used the word black as an adjective to describe someone who is black.

    • marley says:

      06:48pm | 07/11/11

      @Markus - he didn’t use the word “black” as a descriptor, he used it as an insult.  He’s a racist.  I don’t get why so many people on this thread don’t see that.

    • Tim says:

      07:24pm | 07/11/11

      Wow Marley,
      Can you please tell us how you know Williams used it.as an insult and not a descriptor?
      Maybe other people disagree because we’re not mind readers like you.

    • Markus says:

      07:57pm | 07/11/11

      Even if he did use it to imply that a black arsehole is somehow inferior to a white one, all political correctness does in these situations is to encourage people to hide their racial prejudices behind different words.

      i.e. you can be as racist as you want, just don’t say the word black. What exactly does that accomplish?

    • marley says:

      08:07pm | 07/11/11

      @Tim - geez man, you don’t have to be a mind reader to understand he wasn’t making a flattering comment, and the use of the word “black” was meant to be an insult. You just have to listen to what the man said and the context in which he said it.

    • Tim says:

      09:15pm | 07/11/11

      Marley,
      No calling him an arsehole was the insult not calling him black.
      He worked with Tiger for years and they were great mates. To think that he had some underlying racist dislike of Black people is crazy.

    • marley says:

      06:28am | 08/11/11

      Tim, one last time - calling Tiger an arsehole was an insult.  Calling him a black arsehole was a racist insult.  I don’t know (or care) whether Williams is a racist - but his comment was racist.  Period.

    • Steve M says:

      07:44am | 08/11/11

      No Marley, it isnt. And you’ve yet to inform us non mind readers how you can so definitively state its an insult not a descriptive term? Just because you stamp your feet and cry racsim, doesnt make it so.

    • David C says:

      01:17pm | 07/11/11

      Interestingly the fuss is about being referred to as black not being referred to as an arsehole

    • Shama says:

      01:20pm | 07/11/11

      Damn Kiwis.

      Its what happens when you are the arse end of the world.

    • David of the Grand Academy of Adelagado. says:

      01:30pm | 07/11/11

      The professional golf circuit must have the best PR organisation in the world. Have you noticed how there’s ALWAYS a golf result at the end of every radio news bulletin? Big news…. “Some 4th rate hacker we’ve never heard of has missed the cut at some piddling US event we couldnt give a rats about”. Lazy news editors fall for it every time.

    • sir ronald bradnam says:

      02:08pm | 07/11/11

      I bet Elin Nordegren agrees with steve williams.

    • Mahhrat says:

      02:09pm | 07/11/11

      Theory:  Tiger’s PR people are still in league with Williams and this is scripted to help Tiger get past his own PR debacle?

      That’s the thing I’ll never ever ever get - why Tiger apologised for having sex with a whole bunch of pretty women.  Why it was anybody’s business but his and his family’s will never escape me.

      As to whether the comment was racist or not, it was intended as an offensive statement and it invokes the man’s skin colour.  If he were talking of his new boss, he wouldnt’ talk of ramming something up “Adam’s White Arse”; so yes, the comment is racist.  While factually plausible, he only said it because Tiger is black.

    • Nilbog says:

      03:03pm | 07/11/11

      You should look up the definition of racism, cut and paste it into a reply here, then follow it up applying that definition to the facts here.

      Tiger had to apologise (he was forced to by his sponsors) because they had spent a tonne of money fostering this image of Tiger as a good, family man (not the sleaze he so clearly is).

      If he wanted to keep the endorsements (as he did - they are worth a fortune) then Tiger had to sack up and do the extremely embarrassing public apology. That was their terms.

      As to the claim it was a whole bunch of pretty women, some were, some not so much. For someone who could have been a hell of a lot choosier, Tiger chose some absolute prawns.

    • fml says:

      03:32pm | 07/11/11

      It is most definitely a racial slur.

    • Mahhrat says:

      04:48pm | 07/11/11

      @Nilblog:  Do you accept that certain words change in their definition over time?  I submit the word “Gay” for your consideration.

      I further suggest that racism’s definition has been broadened to include this type of comment.  It was a derogatory comment made, based upon his skin colour.  In the common lexicon, it is a racist comment.

    • oingo boingo says:

      09:14am | 08/11/11

      White guilt, man. It’s a killer.

    • Super D says:

      02:10pm | 07/11/11

      There seems to have been a lot of critical descriptors of Alan Joyce floating around pre-fixed with Irish.

      Also Ant Burberry have gone to incredible lengths to de-chav the brand. 

      Finally I regularly play at the Lakes.  Lets hope the wind is up for the tournament.

    • uncle doug says:

      02:37pm | 07/11/11

      I agree with Gobsmac"up his black AH”...I played The Lakes, the other day, forget the wind the front 9 has been ruined, what a joke… Shame on the media for publishing what was said at a private function. Caddies having a joke at their Bosses expence, who hasn’t shit canned an old badly behaved Boss, lets face it, Tiger was very badly behaved!!!!

    • Michael R says:

      02:11pm | 07/11/11

      Just when you think The Punch and Sharwood can’t get any cruder ... down they go into the gutter.

    • marley says:

      05:35pm | 07/11/11

      Now that’s interesting, because I would have said it was Williams who was down in the gutter.

    • Michael R says:

      06:42pm | 07/11/11

      @Marley Yeah Williams is down in the gutter but Sharwood just perpetuates the crude behaviour with his own racist schoolyard comeback. And the whole obsession with stamping out every politically incorrect thought is insanely fascist. Words like this float around all the time. To think that they don’t is to live in a fantasy. To think that they actually mean something terrible and horrid is likewise a fantasy only dreamed up by people who live in a bubble. They are just what happens when people blow off steam. They don’t mean that Williams is a Nazi. They just mean that he is peeved. Whoopdeedoo. You may as well go howl at the wind, because you’d have just as much effect as trying to stamp out loose words.

    • GB says:

      02:17pm | 07/11/11

      Good article Ant and agree with the premise. Leaving the race part out of it for a moment, I have no idea why Scott even employed this colossal douchebag in the first place. Somebody needs to remind this clown he lugs golf clubs around for a living and is nothing more than a glorified bell boy. Why he receives any air time at all is the most astonishing bit, he’s a total dickhead.

    • Joey Joe Joe says:

      03:08pm | 07/11/11

      “Somebody needs to remind this clown he lugs golf clubs around for a living and is nothing more than a glorified bell boy.”

      Said by someone who obviously knows dick about professional caddying.

      If all this guy did was carry clubs he wouldn’t be paid more than minimum wage… but since he makes more than most of you I suggest he does a little more than that out there.

    • GB says:

      03:20pm | 07/11/11

      Looks like I touched a raw nerve with somebody. Sorry for saying such nasty things about your boy Mrs Williams. Let’s see, he carries golf clubs, works out a few distances, and maybe if he’s asked helps to read the greens. “Professional caddying” LOL. As opposed to “Amateur Caddying”?  A bit like calling somebody who pumps fuel at the local Caltex a “Petroleum Distribution Officer”.

    • Tim says:

      06:06pm | 07/11/11

      GB,
      Its obviously out of the generosity of their hearts that golfers pay their caddies 10% of winnings and nothing to do with their skills.
      I mean it couldn’t possibly be the case that you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about could it? Nah.

    • Erick says:

      02:28pm | 07/11/11

      @Antony Sharwood - “Remember the delightfully-named Martha Burk? She’s the rad fem who in 2002 took on Augusta National Golf Club, home of America’s prestigious Masters tournament, for its failure to admit female members.”

      So women should be admitted to all men’s sporting events. Fair enough, but not far enough.

      Let’s go all the way, and abolish segregated sport altogether! Men and women can compete in the same teams and competitions together. Whether it’s boxing, running, footy or golf, let’s drop the sexist barriers and may the best person win!

    • marley says:

      02:49pm | 07/11/11

      @Erick - was she taking on the club for not letting women compete in the Master’s, or for not letting women join the golf club?  I think it was the latter, which is a bit of a different issue (and one I’m not going to argue with you about!)

    • Erick says:

      03:00pm | 07/11/11

      @marley - Perhaps so, but then the same principle applies.

      If women can be members of men’s sports clubs, then men can be members of women’s sports clubs. And if they can be members of the same clubs, they can compete in the same competitions.

      Feminists seem to be very selective about equality. They want it in some places, but not in others.

    • fairsfair says:

      04:07pm | 07/11/11

      “Curves” is going to have something to say about that!

    • Utopia Boy says:

      04:42pm | 07/11/11

      In a previous life I was a soldier. Have you ever seen female soldiers playing Rugby or AFL? An honourable mention goes to female water polo. There would be more than one ball floating in the pool.

      You would be scared. Very scared indeed.

    • Direct says:

      05:04pm | 07/11/11

      Can’t wait to hit the weights at the local Fernwood Gym.

    • marley says:

      05:40pm | 07/11/11

      @Erick - like I said, I don’t want to get into an argument on the issue of club membership.  I do know it took years for Augusta to accept its first black members, and it only let Lee Elder play on the course because he’d actually qualified for the Masters and they didn’t have a choice. 

      Things have changed since then, and they may change again, with, god forbid, women members.  I doubt anyone expects a women to be competing for the Masters anytime soon.

    • seniorcynic says:

      02:45pm | 07/11/11

      Well thanks for printing what Williams said. The mainstream media called it an insult. Probably if Tiger is not fussed about it then we should just let it pass and not give Williams and Scott any more publicity.

    • Tim says:

      03:18pm | 07/11/11

      What a knob that reporter is.
      Sounds like he’s extremely jealous that even though Williams didn’t complete school and may be a dumbass, he’s been able to earn millions of dollars.

    • Utopia Boy says:

      03:40pm | 07/11/11

      Isn’t it funny to see the remarks of most submitters argues AGAINST Williams’ remark being racist. Yet regardless, the press will insist that he is a racist, or has acted in this case, like someone who is a racist.

      This is where the press gets it all wrong - telling people what they should think and how they should behave. It stretches through all areas of “NEWS.” From wars in the middle east, religion, finance, politics, policing, sexual preference and lifestyle.

      The lowest form of NEWS is the reporting of celebrities. Think about it; who gives a flying Jew about Mel Gibson’s personal life? Nobody cares about Paris Hilton’s underwear (or lack of). Yet we are constantly told this rubbish is important to us. It’s not, and I for one, would prefer to be treated as if I have a brain.

      When was the last time a real celebrity headline came from a journalistic interview? We get the headlines and the grainy photo because the newspaper / tv network relies on the public or paparazzi to do their work for them. Sometimes they might even pay for the “news.” But usually it’s downloaded off YouSpace or the interwebs.

      So, was Tiger Woods an arsehole to work for? Probably.
      Is Tiger black? Indeed.
      Is his arsehole actually black? More likely pink.
      Is Tiger primarily made up of his arse? No, he has arms and legs and other bits. We know about some of the other bits.
      Was Williams right to call him a black arsehole? Probably not. Really he’s just insulted him without any finesse whatsoever.
      Typical of a Kiwi.

    • colroe says:

      01:27pm | 08/11/11

      Yep, personally I love to read about Pippa’s arse, which in all probability is pink!!!.  Beats Tigers arse anyday,  What a pathetic story, made even more pathetic by my interest I guess.

    • Utopia Boy says:

      02:29pm | 08/11/11

      @ colroe,
      Indeed Pippa’s arse is quite delightful however, there’s no need for it to be splashed across the front page of mainstream media. It’s a story for Picture / People / Ralph magazines.

    • Chuck says:

      03:40pm | 07/11/11

      I always knew caddies and their sugar daddies were close - maybe Steve was commenting on an anatomical fact. 
      Golf is peppered (black or white) with potentially racists and sexist language - hole in one, birdie, wood, wedge etc
      SNAGs anyone?

    • Rick of the Dustbowl says:

      04:09pm | 07/11/11

      If you believe in the DNA trace of humans we are all black arseholes and it’s only the shade that varies

    • Smithy says:

      12:25am | 08/11/11

      Why denigrate caddies or claim they aren’t professionals deserving of recognition just because one of their number is an arsehole?

    • onlooker says:

      07:29am | 08/11/11

      It’s probably my strange sense of humor, but gee things are bad when we are talking of the color of someone’s arsehole lmao. It is not something I regularly check when I meet people. The comment was probably meant as an insult, it sure has not done him much good by uttering it

    • Dave says:

      09:01am | 08/11/11

      LMAO - what colour would that “A” be?

    • Horns Up says:

      07:49am | 08/11/11

      The first rule of calling an arsehole an arsehole is leaving race/colour etc out of it.

      Tiger Woods is an arsehole. That should be enough.

      \m/

    • Dave says:

      09:00am | 08/11/11

      Why is calling a black person, black making someone a racist? I don’t get this beat up and it is about time the PC Police took a Bex and had a lie down. For what Tiger Woods did to his family he is a complete a**ehole - end of story

    • fml says:

      10:17am | 08/11/11

      Arsehole = acceptable.
      describing color by it self = acceptable.
      Making derogatory comments about someone in this context is bad.

      Whats so difficult to understand.

    • john of solomon says:

      09:45am | 08/11/11

      Why is Williams getting all this media attention - because he used to caddy for Tiger Woods, how did williams earn so much money - caddying for Tiger Woods. Without Tiger Woods no one would have heard of Williams, so he should just crawl back into his hole and shut his mouth, he may be a “good” caddy whatever that means but if he is so good why isn’t he out there winning tournaments? Methinks his rants against Tiger Woods indicate a sad case of penis envy.

    • palone says:

      11:46am | 08/11/11

      Why does Williams get paid so much? Because he knows what Woods’s arse looks like? What color it is?
      Why is calling a black man ‘black’, derogatory? The argument from the PC’s is that it is not the color reference but the association ‘black’ has to a “lower state”. That somehow ‘black’ has come to mean “inferior”.
      Do the black people of the world think that they are inferior? No. Do they think that the reference to their color immediately suggests “inferiority” No. Are they proud, and often state that they are proud, to be black? Yes! Problem? Only with the PC’s who need to show reason for PC’s existence.
      The Australian aborigines have black as a large part of their flag. Why? Because they tell me that they are proud to be black. Not as a racial thing, that’s aboriginality, but as a ‘color’ thing. “Black is beautiful”.
      As skin is the largest body organ, saying someone is a black bastard, as against saying someone is a white bastard is about, (exactly!), the same as calling someone a blue-eyed bastard as against calling them a brown-eyed bastard. And it matters not at all whether either of those above terms is said in jest or in abuse. The adjective is only indicative of the ‘difference’ between one and the other.
      A bit like saying “Long-legged dill” as against, “short-arsed dill”.
      Mind you, if the little bloke thinks being referred to as being short immediately assumes intellectual inferiority then the little people of the world would have a self-esteem problem. But why would he think that?
      I continue to call black people ‘black’, white people ‘white’ and Scandinavians ‘fair complexioned’. No connotation of being of more, or less value, than any other one of a myriad group of vari-colored people.          PC is a crock. It is not politically correct, it is racist in the extreme to be required to exclude reference to someone’s prized heritage in order to satisfy some twisted minority who look for a “cause” and unleash the hateful, foul, stench of assumption. And that stench is all-pervasive.
      We all, all, need to have a rethink. Forget PC. And whoever heard a greater oxymoron than “Political Correctness”?

    • Graham S says:

      02:52pm | 08/11/11

      Can anybody explain to me why a golf course butler Williams, a plonker, a Jeeves to Adam Scott / Tiger Wood’s Bertie Wooster is getting this airspace? A golf bag lugger whose “skill” is to hand a 3 iron or putter to a professional sportsman. Here is a man who parasites his way to a million dollar plus annual income and thinks he deserves respect because golfers are stupid enough to give him a percentage of earnings and privileges rather than a salary more befitting a shopping trolley collector or airport security worker. Even worse New Zealanders should hang their heads in embarrassment if this guy is their highest paid “sportsman”. Imagine Casey Stoner or Mark Weber paying a fool to walk the Grand Prix track prior to the race, handing over a drink at a pitstop then paying the fool a percentage of earnings. Then again maybe Williams could create a job opportunity between golf tournaments.

    • Thumbs down says:

      04:43pm | 08/11/11

      Australia is the only country that openly thinks being racist is okay because of certain technicalilities! I think there is reason of racial awareness which is not addressed by many of the writers above. If it was okay to say whatever we want then calling white people crackers and any all the other names should be okay? Money defiantely cant buy class!

    • Herbivorous Gorilla says:

      09:24pm | 08/11/11

      Yes, golf is boring, understated and conservatively dressed. It is the opposite of just about everything else in modern western culture. Needs more inappropriately dressed tweens, Gaga, Glee and BIG BOLD SCANDALS exposed by tabloid journos of high moral fibre.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter