Back in 2004, all eyes were on an Australian female hurdler as our Olympians readied themselves for Athens. Our strongest ever Olympic team would eventually win 17 gold medals, yet the pre-Games hype was all about Jana Pittman, who would go on to win nothing.

Winners are grinners. Photo: The Courier Mail

So here we are eight years on and again, the focus is on a female hurdler. Only this time it’s different. This time the hurdler is naturally charming, not attention-seeking. This time she’s fit and firing, not half broken down. This time you sense she’s doing it for all of us, not just herself.

Sally Pearson was 22 when she won silver in the 100m hurdles at Beijing. The race was thrilling. But it was THAT post-race interview with Seven’s Pat Welsh which really burned her name and face into our minds.

“OH MY GOD. YOU’VE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, RIGHT? IS THIS REAL?”

No one’s kidding you, Sally. It was real.

“DID YOU SEE ME?”

Uh, yeah, we couldn’t help noticing given it was an Olympic final.

“I WAS LIKE ‘GO FOR IT!’, AND I DID. AND I GOT IT. CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?”


The hardest thing to believe was the interview itself. It was weird, yet it was wonderful in its rawness and wide-eyed honesty. Here was an athlete who was not pre-packaged and cliché-ridden. With a green pom-pom in one hand and a flag on her back, there was none of the designer patriotism of Jana Pittman’s painted fingernails. There was just sheer, unmanufactured exuberance.

Cut forward three and a half years and Pearson is just as natural. What’s changed is her status in the sport. The artist formerly known as Sally McLellan is now the undisputed princess of the track. She won the World Championships last year, as part of an unbeaten streak which lasted for a Black Caviar-esque 19 runs.

On Saturday night at the Sydney Track Classic, on a muggy evening 168 days out from the London Olympics, Sally Pearson showed her true class. A shame the crowd was barely a quarter of that at the footy across the road, because the Sally show was something to see.

First she ran her pet event, the 100 hurdles. She uncharacteristically clipped the last hurdle, yet still ran 12.66, the fastest time she’s ever run in Australia. Some athlete. Ninety minutes later, she lined up in the 200m and blitzed the field.

There was a fair array of talent on display on Saturday. John Steffensen looked strong winning the 400m, although quotes like “you can’t stop a great man” made him sound like the abbreviation of a Westpac banker. And watch out for a guy called Henry Frayne. He’s supposed to be a triple jumper, but he almost out-jumped the long jump pit with a massive leap of 8.27m.

But the night was all about Sally. Girls squealed her name and young men begged to her to marry them. After the 200m, she showed just why her appeal is universal.

“I’m just glad I put on a pretty good show for you all,” she said. “Thanks everyone for coming, it’s been great.”

See? It was all about us, not her.

Charisma, like talent, is one of those attributes you’ve either got or you don’t. Sally Pearson has both by the bucketload. And don’t we need it come London.

On paper, our Olympics hopes look shaky. Our champion swimmers appear past their best, and it’s doubtful if the rising crop will rise quickly enough. The same for our cyclists. Our medal tally could be skinny in London and don’t think the Poms will forget to taunt us about it.

Lucky we’ve got Sally. Unlike a certain other hurdler, you can bet there’ll be no drama. And unlike that other Sally back in 2004, you can bet she won’t lay down.

Indeed, to invoke a gambling phrase which means “an absolute certainty”, you’d have to say Sally Pearson is a lay down misere.

47 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      06:08am | 20/02/12

      I think I’ll go and do a few minutes on the exercise bike.

    • Macca says:

      06:40am | 20/02/12

      Didn’t Pearson also win an IAAF title for women’s best athlete after her 6 Golden League wins from as many starts?

      She is a superstar and it’s a shame she won’t get the same plaudits or exposure as our swimmers

    • Mahhrat says:

      07:01am | 20/02/12

      Good for her.  I’ve got no problem with elite people acting elite - it’s part of the territory - but keep that stuff away from the tall poppy loppers.

    • TChong says:

      09:15am | 20/02/12

      mahhrat
      tall poppys
      I reckon the TPS happens because:
      People who gain attention in one area / endevour, use the resulting fame or meeja attention to start heading in directions that they may not be quite as sound in, but continue to rely on the residual golden glow from original goodwill, for a different purpose.
      Sometimes the public also do grow tired of self indulgent dramas.

    • Fred says:

      09:43am | 20/02/12

      I guess it’s nice to see a nice person rather than someone who’s just keen to get a million bucks selling cereal.

      They’re not elite. It’s just sport.

    • stephen says:

      07:40am | 20/02/12

      She has a good running style.
      No twisted hip movement, or splayed feet, and her swinging arms carve just the right arc too.
      I was small when I was little, and those hurdles, I had to climb over.
      Sally decides to pinch my milk off the front porch, I’ll never catch her.

    • Josh says:

      08:23am | 20/02/12

      She should have won the best sports person of the year last year. Cadel Evans won one race (without even winning a stage) and he grabbed headlines. Sam Stouser wins one tournament and gets the press. Sally won 19 from 20 starts and is a better winner and gets not much.

      Australia has a real world beater here and the only real chance of getting anywhere near the world record. Watch out London!

    • Juz says:

      08:53am | 20/02/12

      Josh, that’s not true about Cadel Evans. He won Stage 4 of last year’s Tour de France on his way to the overall victory.

    • Slim Jim says:

      10:04am | 20/02/12

      He won one race (that lasts for three weeks) that you were aware of. His early season form was good and he took out a couple of smaller stage races on the way to his TDF victory.
      As the first Australian to win the most prestigious race in Professional Road Cycling; his award was warranted.

    • andrew says:

      12:21pm | 20/02/12

      Josh, Cadel Evans Won stage 4 of the 2011 TdF.  He also won Tirreno and Romandie, lead up events to the 2011 TdF.

      Yes, Sally deserves many accolades, but to put Cadel Evans into a undeserving position after winning possibly one of the toughest sporting challenges in the world, across any sport, is pretty poor form on your part.  Comparing two sports stars in totally different sports is a waste of time.

    • Josh says:

      01:49pm | 20/02/12

      They compare sports to award sportsman /sportswomen of the year. So my point is justified. I felt she was robbed, winning all but one race, versus winning a team sport event, (as big as the TdF) is I don’t feel is the same.

      Hopefully another good showing at London will get the attention she and the rest of Australia’s athletics team deserve. it has been a while since we have at the caliber of track and field athletes we have now.

    • andrew says:

      03:42pm | 20/02/12

      So, Quantity of Quality Josh is your opinion.  I get it. 

      I not saying Sallys wins in events that nobody has heard of, nobody watches, nobody reports on, nobody attends are not quality events either or the competition she is racing again are not quality wink.

      Also I am in no way taking away the achievements of Sally Pearson, she deserves everything and more that she receives in accolades, sponsorship and awards including the IAAF Female Athelete of the world that she did receive in 2011.  But so does people like Cadel Evans and Sam Stosur.

      I find it hard that you dont seem to appreciate or comprehend the amazing effort of Cadel Evans to win 2011 TdF.

      What award do you think was robbed of anyway?  Some opinion piece on Foxsports or is it some offical award given by some sporting association or government.  The AIS Sportsperson of the year was (very deserving winner might i add, but you will probably disagree) Anna Meares.  And here is somebody that has come back from a broken neck in 2008 to still be winning 3 world championships and several other races in 2011 - without the media attention either.

    • Stop knocking all our athletes says:

      07:26am | 21/02/12

      Josh just shut up you’re making yourself sound stupid. Cadel and Stosur are athletes at the top of their respective sports they deserve all the attention they get. That one race that Cadel won is the biggest race on the planet for cyclists (which no Australian has done before) and the one tournament Sam won (which no Australian woman has won in decades) is one of the four biggest tournaments on the planet but according to you that’s not world beating enough!!! Not trying to bash Sally (because she is awesome I love her work) but the majority of those 19 wins were not on the biggest stage of her sport. On the biggest stage she did only finish second (again I love her and hope she wins gold at London).

    • DT says:

      08:24am | 20/02/12

      To continue with your racing analogy - nothing decimates the run of a good thing by calling them home around the final turn. Anthony - you may have just robbed her of gold.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      10:34am | 20/02/12

      Nup. Nothing I say ever affects anything. Just ask my wi…. smile

    • Cate says:

      01:28pm | 01/03/12

      Please look up the meaning of decimate. Ta

    • Commodoreharley says:

      08:25am | 20/02/12

      I can’t believe the media still goes on about its vendetta against Jana Pitman. She was a promising athlete and it was her performances that ultimately created expectations, not her media persona.
      What a low blow your reference was to Sally not being “half broken down”, as if having injuries is any worse for us, the public, than it was for the athletes who suffer the pain and the threats to their hopes and dreams.

      I can’t help but wonder if the only real reason you’re so positive about Sally Pearson is simply that she’s more likely to win gold. “Why can’t we have more athletes like her?”. Indeed. Multiple world champions who seem to be the heir in waiting for a gold medal at the London Olympics (which we’ll all be hoping for). Why can’t we have more like them!

    • Mick Taylor says:

      12:17pm | 20/02/12

      Are you writing under the nom de plume ‘Commodoreharley’ now Jana?

    • andrew says:

      12:25pm | 20/02/12

      The media created Jana Pitman to some degree, they stoked those fires.  The media love doing it, just so they can tear people down.  And the Australian Public loving seeing it happen and also love to get involved.

    • Crab says:

      08:37am | 20/02/12

      The only reason we should have more ATHLETES like her is that she is the only one that can win! The rest of the track and field is a complete joke and has been for a long time. Why we pour money into athletics australia when we will only get pounded by africans, americans and russions is beyond me. Stick to swimming and get rid of this money drain.

    • Goldeneye says:

      08:55am | 20/02/12

      “Why we pour money into athletics australia when we will only get pounded by africans.”

      It’s amazing how many Olympic gold medals the Poms have won in athletics. Ever heard of Seb Coe, Steve Ovett, Jonathan Edwards, Sally Gunnell? Amazingly they all happen to be..er..white.

      We need the money because for a country with such high participation in social running we punch way, way, way beneath our weight in athletics.

      Even the Kiwi’s have won a gold medal in 1500m (John Walker) since our last male track gold.

      Our women fare much better.

      Old UK joke I once heards: Why are Australians crap runners? It’s hard to run and balance the chip on both shoulders.

      Your comment kind of proves their point.

      Sadly we will again be brutally exposed again in London. Get ready for our worst Olympics in 25 years.

    • Dave M says:

      09:20am | 20/02/12

      For mine the athletics is what makes the olympics watchable. I start tuning in after the first 10 boring days of swimming. If anything I’d like to see more money pumped into athletics (just take it out of the swimmers budget) and give Aussies the incentive to participate. How can you expect our athletes’ to be competitive when there’s no money in the sport? They have to train day in day out for 4 years, basically on amateur wages, just to have a crack at a gold medal once in a blue moon.

      BTW Crab, the only reason Australia is so successful at swimming is because of our water culture and access to swimming pools. If Africans, Russians and African Americans lived our lifestyle they would be pounding our Anglo butts in the pool, just like they do on the track.

    • Don says:

      06:09am | 21/02/12

      Meh, elite sport is so last century.

    • Country Karen says:

      02:24pm | 22/02/12

      Crab - the only reason we have so many good swimmers is the disproportianate amount of money that goes into swimming across all levels - starts at 5 - vac swim, austswim, in-term swimming, support for club swimming as well as the elite programs.  Other than Little Aths (which get very little money and get slammed for the pittance they get from Maccas) there is no junior athletics - very little school based as teachers have to offer game-based and participation over striving to win.  (which is still apparently OK at swimming carnivals). 

      AIS gets very little money for athletics.  Triathlon gets more.

      That’s the complete joke.

    • MK says:

      08:37am | 20/02/12

      Why can’t all Jounos be like…..
      give me a minute..
      trying to think of a great journo and drawing a blank
      (was lead here by a link “Why can’t all our athlese be like Sally”

      The only thing unbelevable about that interview was when it happened,
      Pat Welsh should have been fired/transfeerd or at least given a restraing order to stay away from all Short track events

      When was the last time you saw an interview of the men’s or womens 100m sprint, RIGHT after the race…
      NEVER
      there is a very good reason for this
      which any nourno or sports journo would know if they over bothered
      to sprint 100m as fast they can,

      it was VERY poor form ambushing the girl so soon after the race,
      common decency or professionalism would have been to give the athlete taht has just given Her all the chance to catch her breath, get oxygen back t her brain and compose herself

      Thanfully Sally has done well,
      but i remember at the time and days after people making comments and jokes
      and everytime i alwasy thought
      It’s not her fault it was the bl**dy Journo!

    • Flutz says:

      10:51am | 20/02/12

      Probably the reason YOU rarely see an intereview with a sprint winner right after the race is because they are rarely Australian.  The medallists go to their home media first - trust me the USA media get to their sprint kings (and queens) pretty immediately after they cross the line.  Pat Welsh is an exceptional and extremely knowledgable sports journalist - it’s a pity he doesn’t get more of the big gigs.  The reason the interview was so amazing is Sally’s naturalness and genuine excitement - and she is still like that to this day, maybe with a little more polish (from experience not from any kind of ‘media training’), she is not completely guarded and full of cliches like most top line sportspeople today.

    • MK says:

      01:29pm | 20/02/12

      Flutz, i dont watch any Jamaican TV, but can say that is No for Maurice Green, Or Marion Jones where at leasta few minutes after corssing the line,
      I watched US sports feeds
      there the multiple minutes of showboating,  runing around with the flag
      strutting around
      jogging with drapped over shoulders
      and you looking at at least 5 minutes after before they get asked a question

    • Flutz says:

      04:37pm | 20/02/12

      MK, maybe you’ve seen feeds from non-primary broadcasters or something, but I was in the US during both the Beijing and Athens games and Gatlin (Athens Gold), Greene (Athens Bronze), Dix (Beijing Bronze) and Williams (Athens Silver) were all interviewed by the US media immediately after the race - before they did their laps of honour, and they were still all just full of practiced polished cliche, which was boring and seemed a little fake to me.  You’ve seen something different from me but my experience of what I saw is what I go on.

    • Gregg says:

      08:39am | 20/02/12

      Sally gives her all and nearly stumbled across the line in that record time after clipping the final hurdle and should be recognised as another of Australia’s golden girls and probably will be looked upon as such in years to come.

      All athletes can have injuries and some may be more prone than others and it was injury that seems to have robbed Jana of her opportunity for top Qlympic honours but hey lets not pick holes in her for that as she also gave as much as she could.

      If more of us could be even half as good as either of them and we might have a much healthier country.

    • jana drama says:

      08:40am | 20/02/12

      It’s all about moi darling

    • Jacques Meoff says:

      08:51am | 20/02/12

      “Why can’t we have more athletes like Sally Pearson?” The answer is actually pretty simple, notwithstanding the simple fact that she is an incredible athlete, the AIS pour 99 percent of their money into supporting the swimmers. Unless you form part of that team you fund yourself to train, travel and compete. Just about every other country in the world have elite programs to actually support the OTHER sport stars, right from early high school. I’m not suggesting that we need to throw more money at sporting programs when our health system is crumbling, we just need to have better distribution.

    • Your name:null says:

      10:50am | 20/02/12

      Your comment: Not just elite money goes to swimming - evry country town has an olympic size swimming pool, while most states could coun’t the number of synthetic runing tracks on one (or at most 2) hands.
      Further to this being great at butterfly/breaststroke doesn’t make you much of a target for the NRL/AFL/ARU/A-League/W-League/Netyball etc.  Being the fastest kid in a sprint at age 12 does

    • cybacaT says:

      09:21am | 20/02/12

      One thing that sets her apart is she sets high standards for herself - world class standards.  She doesn’t finish 5th in an event and say stupid things like “oh - I’m happy within myself” or other cliches that some Aussie athletes come up with.  She doesn’t accept mediocre, and that’s why she’s at the top.

    • Rose says:

      09:54am | 20/02/12

      Wow Ant, aren’t you capable of writing a piece that praises an obviously worthy athlete with out insulting others. I’m rapidly coming to the conclusion that deep down, you are just not a very nice person!!

    • Dave M says:

      10:57am | 20/02/12

      Oh boo hoo Rose, he’s journo for christ’s sake. He wouldn’t even have a job if he didn’t stir the pot and rattle the cages of over sensitive people like you. So what if he bagged Pittman, she carried on like a spoilt, up-herself brat for years, I say fair play. He had to inject some spice into the article to generate a discussion (which has worked) otherwise this article would read ’ Sally’s a good athlete” Full stop. The end. Yeah that would be an interesting read hey Rose?

    • Rose says:

      11:58am | 20/02/12

      Actually it could have been far more interesting if he didn’t go for the cheap shots and used some of his supposed journalistic skill, but that would’ve required some effort on his part!

    • Dazza says:

      10:02am | 20/02/12

      many good points are made in these comments but the facts are that Sally has a great attitude & ability, there are very few opportunities for track & field athletes to make a living from their sport, with the advancement of training we do not have the genetics to compete with the sprinters of the West Indies and African heritage nor the distance runners of Africa so we have to rely on technical events (eg hurdles).
      We have a system that starts plucking talented athletes from the age of about 14 and puts all its resources into them despite the fact that all coaching material states that track & field athletes are unable to show their potential until they finish maturity at around 18 (due to growth related issues). So if you are an early bloomer then you have an advantage but generally most get disenchanted once everyone else catches up. If you are a late bloomer you get disenchanted before you bloom because the focus has been given to the early bloomers.
      Although 3/4 of the competitors are under 20 in most “senior” meets (eg Queensland Athletics)  there is little money spent to ensure that athletes transition from Little Athletics to senior or amateur athletics

    • Country Karen says:

      02:34pm | 22/02/12

      Dazza - some very true comments, although I would dispute the genetic claim - while obviously some advantages, my husband ran a 10.9 100m untrained, on grass in barefeet with a hangover.  (It was an unplanned entry into an electronically timed ‘gift’)  That was 25 years ago - but as previously stated - he was courted by Aussie Rules - whats a boy to do.  He regrets it now - the long term injuries from Aussie rules just aren’t worth it. 

      We just need better investement in our sport - for example over here in the west there is no T&F talent ID program in our schools.  Bet there is with AFL. 

      Senior athletics needs to stop criticizing Little Aths and embrace it for what it is, and as you say - work effectively on the transition.

    • DragonLass says:

      11:00am | 20/02/12

      I’m really looking forward to when Sally retires, as I’m sure she will get a job in media doing some commentating, and she would be brilliant at it.  She’d be interesting and lively.  Not like so many of the ex-atheletes who commentate now who are as dull as dishwater.

    • Zolasgotnoshoes says:

      11:34am | 20/02/12

      Thank you for giving some coverage to athletics. Sports media is only really the marketing arm of parochial football and cricket.  It is a great surprise to see an article on probably one of our greatest athletes of the past 25 years.  Best of luck with the run up to the games Sally - you never know -you might even get on TV news if you win!

    • CBD_Sonja says:

      12:49pm | 20/02/12

      I’d like to know how many funded “spots” are available at the AIS.  To be _that_ good, you need to train all the time.  You can’t have a day job as well.  There are probably a lot of talented sports people out there who can’t get a break.
      I also despise the media.  A few years ago, some hot shot swimmer was going really well, and the media asked him if he would step down to let perkins onto the olympic team.  WTF.  the new guy earned his place on the team so the media should have kept the stinking noses out of it!  At the Australian Olympics (was it???) a swimmer didn’t win, and the reporter said “How do you feel about letting down your country?”.

      But I will say good on ya and all the best to those that do make it to the grand events like the Olympics.

    • Phantom says:

      01:33pm | 20/02/12

      Pretty honest person.  Not like that idiot Steffensen who in his mind is all about him and listening to his post race interview - he came across as a squeazer

    • Josh says:

      01:48pm | 20/02/12

      i agree with the drama that jana has created and how sally has been better than jana with australia… but i dont like the attack on her about the olympic final in 2004, she injured herself 2 weeks before the olympics… and ran sub 54 in the final… jesus christ people…

    • OY says:

      02:05pm | 20/02/12

      Go Sally!!
      Jana Pittman just want to stay in limelight perhaps for sponsorship. She always has injuries or some other lame excuse. Not sure why media even name her.

    • Dick j says:

      02:27pm | 20/02/12

      Yep she is a great runner and a natural.

      But that Stephensen bloke is a shoker . He is and underacheiver like Anthony Mundine good but not world class by a long shot,  zero humility and class.

      His hype doesn’t match his results. He has not run an olympic qualifier even yet.

    • Emma says:

      11:46am | 21/02/12

      It seems very unkind not to mention that Jana Pittman needed knee surgery a week out from the Athens Olympics and still finished top five.

    • Cate says:

      02:02pm | 01/03/12

      Too much attention is paid to sport in this country. Tthe olympics was supposed to be for amateurs.  Now it has turned into big business.  I haven’t watched it for decades. I did however watch Kathy Freeman run the 400m. That was the last great success. I don’t bother watching the swimming anymore it used to be fun.  Now they shave and the swim- suits are ridiculous.  If you have to be bald to win a race, where is the fun in that.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter