In 2007, members of the Federal Parliamentary Liberal and National Parties tried to convince themselves that the polls were wrong.

Can everyone just take a breath.

Despite months of poor polling, we clung to a belief that we would succeed at the election.

There was a disconnect between the polls and the ‘feeling’ in the electorate, members would proclaim.

“There is no hostility in the electorate,” was another common report.

It was true. There was no hostility. People were polite, but they had made up their minds. They acknowledged the good work of the Howard government, but they would vote for a change.

I am reminded of those events when I consider the current state of the Opposition.

For almost two years, the Coalition has been trailing in the polls. Like 2007, we can pretend that they are wrong, or we can tackle the problem.

Central to our challenge is the role of an Opposition.

Like most occupations, experience counts for much in politics.

Only one-quarter of the Coalition members and senators served in Opposition before. And less than one-fifth of the frontbench sat in Parliament prior to 1996.

There are two crucial tasks for an Opposition.

First, we must point out the faults and failings of the Labor government. That is not to oppose everything the government does, for no government is always wrong. Our message must enjoin the principles which we believe will make Australia a better place with our criticisms of the Australian Labor Party.

When a party is elected to office, its primary responsibility is the continued government of the nation. Ministers are appointed to administer the departments of state responsible for the various activities of the nation. Much of this work requires no legislation or no new legislation.

The party elected to govern has a right to put its proposed legislation before the Parliament and have it debated, as have other members and senators.

Equally, the Parliament has the duty to scrutinize carefully any such proposals. And the Opposition has the responsibility to the people of Australia to continue to argue for those policies it believes will enhance the prosperity of this nation.

But apart from the bills to guarantee the continued operation of the government, known as supply, there is no general expectation that an Opposition will support the government. Even supply can be rejected in exceptional circumstances.

The role of the Opposition is to consider any legislation the government proposes. It can support it or reject it. In doing so, it should set out its own principles as to why it believes the proposal is, or is not, in the national interest.

Some people believe that the Opposition should seek to improve the government’s legislation. The problem with this approach is that it can involve the Opposition compromising its own principles, and often sending a mixed message to the community.

From time to time, a government will claim it has a mandate for certain legislation. This is usually a device used to avoid discussion of the details of the proposed changes.

But opposition is not enough.

“In my view,” said Robert Menzies, “the duty of an opposition which wants to move over on to the Treasury benches is to be constructive, judicious, and different.” Being different means articulating our principles and developing policies consistent with them.

People vote on their perceptions, and not generally issues, but it is the response to the various issues that go to create the important perceptions. That is why hard policy work is important.
As Robert Menzies said:

Opposition gives more time for study and thought. It must be regarded as a great constructive period in the life of a party; properly considered, not a period in the wilderness, but a period of preparation of the high responsibilities which you hope will come.

Those high responsibilities will only be returned to us if we have provided the people of Australia with an alternative, with a choice that demonstrates both the differences between us and Labor, and the direction we would take this great nation.

This is the task we now face.

Most commented

36 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Tim (ex liberal member) says:

      12:23pm | 01/12/09

      your’e a fool Andrews. Pity you can’t read poll now or you wouldnt have chosen Abbott and you’d realise that Australians want action on climate change.

    • E says:

      12:28pm | 01/12/09

      nah, youll only get into government when Labor is on the nose, the electorate dont like either party, its a matter of them being sick of the sound of the incumbents voices. you might as well go on holidays for a few years until we are sick of Labor, because you are dealt from the same deck as them anyway and nothing you say can be trusted.

    • Pete says:

      12:38pm | 01/12/09

      Good piece Kev - back to the coffin in the cellar now.

    • Edward says:

      12:39pm | 01/12/09

      Forget Tim and bring it on.  I reckon Tony Abbott is tops. 

      Relax Tim - we will get action on Climate Change.  At a Global Level and at a Local level - but hopefully, as little as possible, at a tax level.

    • ETS ETC. says:

      12:40pm | 01/12/09

      @ Tim - Pity Rudd’s ETS doesn’t deliver “action”.

    • Jim Fletcher says:

      12:56pm | 01/12/09

      At some stage there will be an election, and one would hope this will be an oportunity to seriously analyse the pro’s and con’s of the climate change agenda.
      No doubt there will be ex liberal members such as (I don’t suffer fools gladly) Tim,and possibly many traditional supporters who are so convinced of the ‘science’ that they will not support other parties - realistically it is not unreasonable to assume there may be ALP supporters not too delighted in being railroaded into schemes that appear to be more about satisfying the ego of Rudd than a rational balanced approach in keeping with any worldwide agenda.

    • Oracle says:

      01:04pm | 01/12/09

      Yeh we want action on climate all right. We want it now. Immediate action is required and has been enabled to get rid of the joke that is the ETS. I for one am proud of what the libs did today. It took guts and already the fighting words have started. Lets get Climategate out there for all to see. Action on Climategate NOW!!

    • pc says:

      01:09pm | 01/12/09

      Hi Kev, Hi teens,

      So Kev, you say the job of the opposition is to oppose on principle and policy.

      “The role of the Opposition is to consider any legislation the government proposes. It can support it or reject it. In doing so, it should set out its own principles as to why it believes the proposal is, or is not, in the national interest.”

      All this talk of principles sounds pretty fictitious to me Kev, but why listen to me? Im just in need of a good kick in my pseudonymous smart@rse. How about Lenore Taylor in the Oz on the weekend? (I really enjoyed Insiders too Lenore.)

      Lenore Taylor Fact and Fiction. Nov 28/29 2009

      “The facts are the Coalition has already offered the Rudd government bipartisan support for the cautious targets it intends to put on the table at Copenhagen (5 percent cuts if there is not clear international agreement up to 25 percent cuts if there is), and while Australia has been transfixed by the Liberal Party’s week-long effort at group suicide, the rest of the world has been busy making commitments, too…..
      The anti ETS camp says China’s promise is not the same as an absolute emissions cut and that means the playing field is still not level. Its true, China’s promise is not an absolute cut, because that would be almost impossible given the pace of China’s growth. But it’s a promise that contributes substantially in terms of avoided Co2….
      Even back in 2007 the Howard government by its Shergold taskforce, which none of the ETS opponents publicly disputed at the time, was that it was still in Australia’s best interests to establish an ETS……..
      How can the Liberals go to the electorate with a new leader, imposed on the party by this anti ETS group, who is convincing when he says his party is committed to action on climate change but just wants to delay this bill or introduce something different?”

      If this was about principle then you would pass the legislation that you negotiated. If this was about principle you wouldnt have rolled your leader for doing what he said he’d do. A broken no hoper of an opposition doesnt sound like much of an opposition.

    • iansand says:

      01:46pm | 01/12/09

      Great piece, Kev.  But why did the party elect Rabid Abbott, who is incapable of this measured approach?

    • Steve Smith says:

      01:50pm | 01/12/09

      I still don’t understand how Tony Abbott can convince the voting public of his worth, if he can barely convince his own party. 50% of the Liberal vote pretty pathetic, that’s pretty much half of half.. Good Luck to him, but it will be a swift exit if the Liberals can’t get their act together.

    • Drewboy says:

      02:00pm | 01/12/09

      Why shouldn’t the opposition question the legislation? What is the rush in pushing this through before Copenhagen?

      I think the fact that we are pausing and taking a breath is a step in the right direction.

    • Christina says:

      02:18pm | 01/12/09

      Today i am proud to be a member of the Liberal Party.  At least some people are not gullible naive and capable of being duped by a media/left wing exercise in hysteria.
      Go Liberals!

    • Thomas Wertheim says:

      02:31pm | 03/12/09

      Go Liberals, yes     right back into the political wilderness

    • Jannie says:

      02:20pm | 01/12/09

      Its good that you are ruminating so much about opposition…............with todays display of idiocy in the Liberal partyroom , you will have decades to refine it

    • Lloyd says:

      02:47pm | 01/12/09

      Great comment Kev.

      The hero of the Libs managed one more vote than the traitor of the Libs. Not to forget one of your number found the election card too complicated and voted informally - perhaps they tied. Sounds abour right don’t you think!

      I am concerned that the alternative Government for Ausrtralia supports the right of their elected members to be ill-informed, to remain ill-informed and to impose thier igorance on the electorate - you are an embarrasment to Australia. I am more concerned that the smart ones allow this to happen for whatever reason!!

    • Ben says:

      03:21pm | 01/12/09

      Kevin
      1.People like you and your ilk hated Turnbull from the start, he is everything you oppose philosphically and in personal style. And yet you and your ilk stood by and watched him be promoted again and again until he became leader of the party when you decided to tear him down in the destructive way for the party. Naturally you are entitled to your beliefs but to claim the high moral ground you have to do more than believe, or else any act of faith is an empty one.
      2. The cprs is not technically a new tax as well you know. How are you going to convince an electorate generally disposed to agree with a carbon trading scheme of that especially when the ALP went to an election with one as a key (if somewhat vague) platform?
      3. How are you do the above when, not only does policy as it currently stands so closely resemble the Howard Govt’s as remind of the saying ‘imitation is the sincerest form of flattery’ or will you claim credit for negotiating the amendments and complete your hypocrisy?
      4. How many times has the Coalition claimed that they have a mandate to do things in government? Plenty of times! While the conventions around mandates are not as strong concerning legislation other than supply, you can’t deny that where a party goes to an election with a specific policy and it is elected that it can claim some electoral mandate. Are you also denying the ALP had a mandate to abolish much of WorkChoices?
      5. Likewise it is difficult to see how you can your ilk can claim an overwhelming mandate to vote down a cprs when you won by only one vote with one informal vote in the mix. You have in effect split the party down the middle and exposed the party’s fault line for all to see. What happens if the very real possibility that Liberal Senators vote in favour of the cprs in sufficient numbers to pass the bill even though you and your ilk have just torn down a leader to acheive the opposite?
      Kevin much like Phil Ruddock you have enjoyed a reputation for decency and conviction if not charisma. Will you like Ruddock continue to trash that reputation in some vainglorious bid for more political position?
      Through your religious beliefs you are associated with a theological view of climate change. Will you explain that to us all so that we might all understand what is driving you down this path alongside political ambition.

    • John Adams says:

      03:28pm | 01/12/09

      Lloyd it is the Climate Change believers who are ill informed and who almost succeeded in imposing their ignorance on Australia, thank goodness Kevin Andrews and the other principled Liberals have saved the country by stepping back from the ALP tax abyss.

      I think you and your ALP ilk are probably concerned at any organisation that allows dissent.  But get used to it, your outdated AGW pseudo-science is rapidly going out of fashion, it is now “hip” to be a sceptic, dull to be a conformist. 

      Change is coming.

    • Farce says:

      04:27pm | 01/12/09

      No, Mr Andrew, *here* is what the Liberal party is all about:

      “A few minutes into his first news conference Tony Abbott made his first big lie as Liberal Party leader, only to be called on it less than three hours later by no less an authority than the Reserve Bank of Australia.

      And in the process, Abbott signalled his intent to continue the opposition’s form of running wildly populist and irrational GFC commentary – the Daily Telegraph of political economics.”
      Michael Pascoe SMH 1 Dec 2009.

    • Lies and more damn lies says:

      05:21pm | 01/12/09

      How can you expect anyone to take heed of anything YOU say about anything. You are more twisted than FlipaboutAbbott, and that is a hard thing to do.

    • Dick Dalton says:

      05:59pm | 01/12/09

      Once again it’s time to say,

      Australia will never have a world class opposition until Labor loses an election.

    • Anthony Cooper says:

      06:29pm | 01/12/09

      Well I guess it’s done now. Going back to the 80’s business (which Howard finalised) isn’t the answer. You need to move forward my friend.

      Today was a GIANT step to the past.

      Didn’t you learn anything from the last election?

      Fortunately, my local member (Fran Bailey) is retiring at the next election so I won’t feel guilty when I seriously consider other options.

      Best of luck on your mission… Tony Cooper

    • Steve says:

      07:15pm | 01/12/09

      Farce says on 05:27pm | 01/12/09, whats that? All I am hearing is another rate rise. Keep bringing attention to it though.

    • Neil says:

      08:55pm | 01/12/09

      Kevin just to set the record straight. The Howard Government took us into two wars selling us lies, imposed Work Choices without a mandate, gave us the administrative nightmare called GST. Embarassed us all by having the Pacific Solution. Built a surplus by shifting Commonwealth Aged Care costs to the State Health systems. Waisted the productivity gains made by the former government and I might add the effort and sacrifice made by many working class Australians.

      Just look at what has done damage to the Labour Government. this year.. copying the Liberal approach to keeping boat people off our shores. The economic impact of “boat people” is so small it does not matter. But of course the ETS couldnt be discussed or focussed on while that rubbish went on… and the Opposition had no meaningful position to put…. and it still does not… swapping leaders is not creating policy.

      Canberra this year has been like a crowded fish pond visited by a stupified bunch of kittens. Your so called opposition has been ineffectual, misguided and now is engaged in the spin that they have accused Labor of all year. Without a great deal of spin you cant back out of every one of your false positions and you certainly cant sell a dud like Tony as a viable Prime Minister… can you trust anything that he says…... I cant.

    • Daniel says:

      09:01pm | 01/12/09

      I can wait till the next election. The Liberals hopefully will be in the political Wilderness.

    • JS says:

      10:23pm | 01/12/09

      Kevin, I would have been happy to see a thoughtful, considered politician such as yourself as leader of the Opposition. While I have a couple of quibbles with Abbott, I am nevertheless happy that he prevalied as well (I’d be happier if he gave up the notion of man-made climate change but grateful he can see through the crap and spin of the ETS and prepared to take the fight to Rudd&co;. over this and other appalling policies).  Keep speaking truth.  And stick to your principles

    • davido says:

      12:06am | 02/12/09

      Thanks guys you just made my next vote a lot easier.

      You see I was thinking of voting against Rudd but no way would the Abbott get my vote. The guy is an abortion nut for starters.

    • X Catholic female voter says:

      02:34am | 02/12/09

      I can’t believe how out of touch the Liberal party is these days.  You can’t expect that women are going to vote for a right winged catholic nutter? He can’t keep his religion from interfering with his decisions. Don’t try and say otherwise, his track record (regardless of his meaningless apologies) speaks volumes for his ability to lead the people. At least Hockey would have been a viable option. Now? I have no options.

    • Shannon says:

      06:57am | 02/12/09

      heh.  kev is just happy because he’ll be dragged off the backbench to try and re-instate his racist, sexist, homophobic neo-nazi rightwing mix-religious-and-political ideological butt back into a portfolio.  god will exist before abbott wins the next election, and come down from heaven and prove it to me in something that isn’t a psychotic episode.  HA!

    • Jolanda says:

      07:11am | 02/12/09

      I thought that the role of the opposition was to make sure that the Government in power was properly doing their job and looking after the welfare of the people. 

      When I wrote to the Liberal party in relation to allegations of systematic bias, victimization, bullying, manipulation of state records, corruption and a conspiracy to cover up in a Government Department aimed at children the Liberal party’s action/inaction actually assisted in the cover up as the Labor party used the fact that the Liberal Party member accepted the lies presented by those alleged to be responsible as the truth (despite the evidence clearly showing different)  and just refused to do anything further. 

      When I continued to write providing clear evidence to support my allegations I was told by a Liberal minister that ‘They didn’t have the power or resources to investigate individual complaints and that they couldn’t help”.

      If you think about it the majority of complaints are made by individuals and if our Politicians can ignore individuals with the excuse of lack of funding and power then really Governments are a total waste of taxpayer’s money.  This failure to do the right thing also acts to discredit those who speak out as people actually believe that they would do something if there was evidence.  They do not realize that our Political masters have an understanding and they all agree to do nothing about matters that impact individuals in power employed by the Government.

      Questioning the actions of a public servant doesn’t take that much power or money.  It just takes the will - something that our Politicians lack.  The fact is that they all use the same process of dealing with complaints as they all like the administrative process to ‘cover up’ their incompetence, bias or misconduct.

      Education - Keeping them Honest
      http://jolandachallita.typepad.com/education/
      Our Children deserve better.

      .

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      08:54am | 02/12/09

      Wow, the Labor voters are getting really nasty about this so they must be really worried. Who is to blame for this ETS policy failure? Why none other than K Rudd and P Wong! They have failed to explain their policy to the people of Australia. P Wong was rattled when asked that question on Skynews this morning. She knows she has failed to explain it to us poor dumb constituents and you can now see the look of fear in her eyes. Why was Rudd galavanting around the world when his ETS was crashing down around his ears? By shouting us down as skeptics and deniers of climate change when in fact we just don’t agree with Rudds solution has been damaging to their own argument for an ETS. Shot yourselves in the foot and continue to do so. I don’t appreciate being labelled as such and a ground swell of others now feel the same. Wong says the opposition is running a scare campaign but in reality it is the government that has been doing so. If we don’t do it just as Krudd says then we are all doomed. Well bring it on. We finally have an OPPOSITION…

    • Charles says:

      10:31am | 02/12/09

      Is sectarian bigotry acceptable in Australia? Have we learnt nothing about how ugly Catholic bashing has been to our social fabric since the mid 1900s? You attack the man, know nothing of his intellectual or spiritual development, what challenges he may have faced. I find this dribble disgusting and I am now thinking of converting to Catholicism or Orthodox Christian in defiance of this bile.

    • small "l" liberal says:

      10:39am | 02/12/09

      Kevin, the way you, Nick Minchin and Tony Abbott acted by undermining your leader in by media doorstops was so ugly, I would never vote for you again. Malcom Turnbull may not have been a product of your Canberra club but he did not deserve to be treated that way. He was the leader. Now you have a patsy who will flip flop everywhere.  I am a small “l” liberal who will not vote for you this weekend and will lodge a protest vote against you- if you lose the seat, it is your decision to elect Abbott!

    • Mr Subramanian says:

      12:39pm | 02/12/09

      Does anyone else find it odd that Kevin Andrews would be quoting Robert Menzies about the role of the Opposition? That particular gentleman seems to have spent a lot less time in Opposition than in Government…

    • Joe says:

      01:29pm | 02/12/09

      Thanks Kevin for getting the parliamentary ball rolling against the ETS. In the end you were so right.

    • Bob says:

      12:10am | 03/12/09

      You can put Money on it the next Liberal PM will NOT be Abbott. That is a sure bet too, because *IF* and when it looks like they could go close to wininng an election you can be assured they will put someone better up, perhaps Hockey but mark my words it will NOT be Abbott and he knows he is only the caretaker leader.

    • Iram says:

      05:34pm | 07/02/12

      I’m sure he’s no onopnept of the GWOT, but, maybe Simon Birmingham was right, and the Government’s insulation scheme is a greater threat to Australians than ‘jihadist’ terrorism…I mean, how many people have died in Australia as the result of a terrorist attack since 9/11 compared to those killed installing isulation?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Bogans_Heroes @1fatbogan Ha! So Adelaide, so creepy. Gilles St, then Unley, then Pembroke.

Paul Colgan

@joekiely just beat the crus. No sweat eh?

Paul Colgan

@bolgo101 Stick ROG in front of the posts and you still have white knuckles

Paul Colgan

@joekiely how far out was he?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter