Look who’s making runs again. His name’s Ricky Ponting, and you might remember him from such failed captaincy campaigns as the 2005 Ashes, the 2009 Ashes and the 2010/11 Ashes.

Do it like I did only, you know, better. Pic: AP

OK, so the guy wasn’t all bad news as skipper. There was, after all, that 2006/07 Ashes whitewash, and those unbeaten 2007 and 2003 World Cup campaigns.

But captaincy undoubtedly took its toll on Ponting. First came the spats and hissy fits, as his mental state clearly disintegrated. Then he lost the ability to hit the ball. As the ship skippered by Captain Ricky sank, his batting average went with it. Australian cricket couldn’t afford either of those things.

So here we are in Sri Lanka, on a tour half of Australia doesn’t even know is happening, and guess what? The new regime is working.

Forget the losses in the two T20 games because Clarke and Ponting didn’t play those. In the first two matches of a five game ODI series, Ricky Ponting and Michael Clarke are both on fire, with two half centuries apiece.

This is good news on two fronts. Firstly, it shows that the two of them can perform well together, despite the recent power shift. If there’s any animosity between the two, or jealously, or resentment, they’re both being big boys and covering it up beautifully.

More importantly, their changed roles appears to be motivating both players to play at their absolute best.

Ponting has been ice cool since his reappearance in the team. Those famously steely eyes appear to have narrowed yet further. With his newfound focus, he has rediscovered his timing.

No joviality or high-fiving for this former great. Ponting wears his game face every ball, determined, it seems, to tell his team-mates, and Sri Lanka, and the entire cricketing world, that he is once more an international cricketer of true substance.

The pull shot is back, after a summer where he was so often caught in the infield off miscues. The effortless clips off the pads and the crisp straight drives have returned too. Ponting was brutal in the way he drew Australia to victory with 11 overs to spare. Bet you an even fifty he even enjoyed himself.

Clarke, meanwhile, is also batting better than he has for two seasons. We all know he can nudge and nurdle his way to 50 in one day cricket. But last night, he was adventurous. How long since we’ve seen him hit inside-out sixes over mid off?

The last guy to play that particular shot so well was Damien Martyn, and the innings in which he played it best was the 2003 World Cup final – with Ricky Ponting bludgeoning a huge score at the other end.

When Ponting is at his best, he has a way of freeing up the classical right handers in the team to play their most fluent game. It worked with Marto, and it seems to be rubbing off on Clarke too.

Economists will tell you that you need two or more businesses in cut-throat competition to generate the best outcome for consumers. The same applies in sport.

Of course, Punter and Pup will tell you that they’re team-mates, not competitors. Phooey to that. The old dog is clearly desperate to remind the new pup just what made once made him so great. Just as surely, the Pup doesn’t want to be upstaged and has found his best game.

The reshaping of cricket’s power balance has done wonders for our batting top order. Now, if only we could fix the rest of the team up…

47 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • adam says:

      01:44pm | 15/08/11

      The moment a metrosexual was appointed Australian Cricket Captain was the moment I stopped caring

    • fairsfair says:

      02:09pm | 15/08/11

      LOL. I shall agree adam. I don’t know what it is about Clarke - he screams wankery and incompetence, but I hope I am proven wrong.

    • adam says:

      02:25pm | 15/08/11

      he once was quoted as saying something along the lines of “don’t dislike me just because I don’t drink beer” or some such, and they still gave him the captaincy. Strange days

    • Tubesteak says:

      02:51pm | 15/08/11

      Well, Warnie was the first metro and I don’t think anyone would begrudge him walking out into the middle. But he was never captain so your point stands.

      The real test is Pup’s maturity. He didn’t show any over our summer. Maybe he’s managed to pull his head in and started to play cricket but if he’s doing reverse sweeps it doesn’t appear that way. He got lucky hitting it for six as it could just as easily have fallen down someone’s throat. That was his problem last summer.

      Pup needs to prove he can pull his head in and play straight cricket.

      But since Australia is no longer diminating I find cricket even more interesting. Can we get back on top?

    • Max Redlands says:

      03:06pm | 15/08/11

      @Tubesteak “Warnie… was never captain…”

      Mores the pity.

    • Leo says:

      06:14pm | 15/08/11

      Clarke has captaincy written all over him… just not cricket. Perhaps he could lead the first male netball team or a command a glittering dance troupe to victory on dancing with the stars? That said he is more orthodox in his field placings than Ponting who at times simply beggared belief in his strategy.

    • scubasteve says:

      07:51pm | 15/08/11

      I can’t take him seriously as long as i am greeted by a 20 foot poster of him in his underwear every time i am in a big city department store.
      caught AB or SW in their jocks?
      ah dont thunk so.

    • Reflex says:

      09:57pm | 15/08/11

      @ ScubSteve; “caught AB or SW in their jocks?”

      Only in a secret sex tape

    • Lapun says:

      10:53pm | 15/08/11

      @Scubasteve - What about Pat Rafter? The League players at Lowes? Camilo Villegas? Federico Gonzales?

    • TheBigWillyStyle says:

      01:49pm | 15/08/11

      Are Australians simply too fed up with cricket to be interested in this article? Is the Ponting/Clarke combo too little too late? I don’t watch cricket any more anyway, but it does strike me as interesting that the comments line for this story has not lit up with Howard’s Battlers plugging away for the baggy green…

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      01:57pm | 15/08/11

      Um, that’s cos we just put the piece up

    • TheBigWillyStyle says:

      02:05pm | 15/08/11

      Point taken! Didn’t see the time of posting… My question still stands though. Do we still love cricket as much now as we did then? Given we’re in a long term form slump, has cricket has its day in Aus?

    • fairsfair says:

      02:07pm | 15/08/11

      Name suits… dick of self made.

    • fairsfair says:

      02:29pm | 15/08/11

      Damn puter ate my emoticon! That was supposed to have a wink after it BigWilly.

      The seconday wording of your question is much better than the first and I say to a degree yes - Cricket was way better when we were winning all the time. Everything has its peaks and troughs though - it will become super popular again once we start winning.

    • Ben C says:

      02:40pm | 15/08/11

      @ TheBigWillyStyle

      We need to take hints from the English fans - the Poms were struggling not that long ago. Did the fans care? Absolutely not, they were there to support their players all the same. Look where England are now, top of the world, and they’ve just knocked off India by an innings.

      We need to stand behind our team, and we need to get rid of our selectors fast - too many unnecessary changes just because we’re not the best team anymore, but that’s a whole other debate.

    • Steve says:

      05:11pm | 15/08/11

      Big willy. A one day series in Sri Lanka in the middle of an Australian winter is not going to capture the attention like an ashes test series.
      (the baggy green is only worn in test matches)

      I stick with the test team through thick and thin. I started following cricket in the pre world series days when Australia was number 1 (If they had test rankings)

      I felt that the long time we were recently world champs was my reward for sticking through ther lean 80’s post WSC days.

    • SimpleSimon says:

      01:54pm | 15/08/11

      Glad to hear they’re both doing well - it will be an interesting partnership to watch evolve.

    • K says:

      02:05pm | 15/08/11

      Good signs. Johnson is bloody good when he bowls it on the pitch. Lee and Bollinger firing. Even Doherty is taking wickets.

      Just wonder how our middle order will go…

    • Sigmoid says:

      02:05pm | 15/08/11

      Cricket does what now? Is it summer?

      How about them Bunnies!

    • Sigmoid says:

      02:07pm | 15/08/11

      Cricket does what now? Is it summer?

      How about them Bunnies!

    • jasperjen says:

      02:23pm | 15/08/11

      Yay Ricky, never mind those with little faith that you still had it in you. May the the force be with you and stay till the next Ashes series. Before you retire and hang up your bat, knock the silly grin off the faces of the Pommes and their new found status and show them that we out in the Colonies are alive and well and back with a vengence to claim our No1 spot again.

    • Max Redlands says:

      02:31pm | 15/08/11

      As a life long devotee of cricket it saddens me to say I can’t drum up much enthusiasm for this. I have little interest in ODIs much less Twenty20.

      People talk about “cricket tragics”; well, what ‘s tragic about cricket today is the decline of Test cricket at the expense of the shorter forms of the game, especially Twenty20, .

      See this by the inimitable Mr. Gideon Haigh: http://www.espncricinfo.com/thebig_2000_test/content/story/519422.html

    • Babe in the Woods says:

      05:35am | 16/08/11

      @Max, I agree with most of what you say.  I am not a huge fan of ODI, but don’t mind them as light entertainment.  I also understand they were there to fund the test cricket, which is the true test of a side.  Mind you, I remember back in the 70’s going to see the Windies and the World XI taking it to the Aussies, all wearing those weird looking big white crash helmits.  Packer was a visionary.  We would all sit down with our slabs of beer and goonies of white and have a bloody good night.  As for the Tests, nothing better than a 5 day pass watching real men carve up the Poms.  The main reason I just turned off cricket is not the 20/20 garbage, it is because all the characters are gone.  Clarke is symptomatic of what we have.  Cultured metrosexuals.  You will never see another Boon, Lillee, Marsh - or a Botham, Joel Garner, Garth La Roeux etc.  So now it is all money money money.  And that makes for boring cricket and the sneaky suspicion that any amazing win must have been a match fix.  You want to see passion in a game?  Irish hurling which is still amateur.  Or go to watch the Newtown Jets.  Passion.  When the money came, the passion went, and so did the crowds.  Sad times indeed.

    • Chris says:

      02:31pm | 15/08/11

      I really hope this is the beginning of a beautiful partnership. I haven’t seen Ponting play a cover drive with such beauty in a long, long time. He is playing so well!

      Big Willy Style and Adam, if you don’t care about cricket, why comment? You obviously do care.

    • adam says:

      03:19pm | 15/08/11

      it’s like when a pizza burns the top of your mouth Chris, you just can’t stop worrying at the irritation with your toungue

    • labrat says:

      12:39am | 16/08/11

      @adam, yet you will still try to eat the pizza, because it is delicious.

    • David says:

      02:36pm | 15/08/11

      statistically clarke is the greatest captain of the australian ODI side of all time 29 times hes captained for a total of 23 wins hes swinging @ an impressive 79.31% win rate.

    • VVS says:

      04:58pm | 15/08/11

      Test stats are the only captaincy stats that matter…

    • Steve says:

      05:19pm | 15/08/11

      Except for the world cup all one day cricket is light entertainment at best.  The only one day stat for a captain is world cup wins.

    • Dbee says:

      02:43pm | 15/08/11

      Was good to see Ricky crack a couple of smiles while feeling. Haven’t seen that for about 5 years. He is fantastic to watch when he is in form.

      England no 1 team? In my mind the Proteas are better. England got away with murder by drawing that series.

    • TChong says:

      02:49pm | 15/08/11

      Clarkey and Ponting are playing well, ,why the bagging?
      We need stable partnership in the line up.
      Crickets popularity aint on the wain.,beating SL, then beating India later this year will show the Oz talent is starting to get back to where it should be.

      Sigmoid- them bunnies were amazing,  , but they still have cowboys and Broncos to go.

    • Shifter says:

      11:38am | 16/08/11

      Because Clarke is a wanker and Ponting is a prat. And the ACB loves them so much they won’t drop them from the side no matter how bad they are playing.

    • NSW says:

      03:03pm | 15/08/11

      But we have no bowlers and this will be proven in the games that actually matter - Test matches.

      What makes me sick is the England/South Africa/Ireland hybrid team that is destroying India. Everytime I see a grinning Pietersen I want to throw my TV.

      @ Max Redlands - Agreed. I can deal with normal one dayyas…just ..but as for 20/20s…cant stand them. Its just like everything else in todays modern society - dumbed down and simplified because the pea brained masses dont have the attention span to focus on anything other than Harvey Norman ad. Test Matches will always be the real game to me.

    • ellie says:

      04:19pm | 15/08/11

      ‘Everytime I see a grinning Pietersen I want to throw my TV.’

      Do ya, everytime I see Pietersen, I think, would love him playing for us (Aussies), lol. 

      However, agree with you and Max,  Test Matches are the real game.

    • Adolph Eichmann says:

      04:35pm | 15/08/11

      NSW says Gott mit Uns:03:03pm | 15/08/11


      You’d have no time for the Wallabies then.  Or Australian tennis.  Or half the athletics squad in next years Olympics.

    • stephen says:

      04:51pm | 15/08/11

      Couple of good cricket books out.
      Sir Don Bradman’s ‘How to play cricket’ I think it’s called, would have to be the pick. (And written I think in the 1940’s)
      Don’t buy the Cambridge Companion to Cricket.
      Expensive, and got luke-warm reviews.

    • Max Redlands says:

      05:30pm | 15/08/11

      “How to Play Cricket”- first published in serial form in the Daily Mail in England (1935).

      I have a 1955 edition (it’s even older than I am!!).

      One of the best cricket books I have read is the aforementioned Gideon Haigh’s “The Summer Game”. Also his history of the ACB “Inside Story” (written with David Firth) is highly recommended - the inside story indeed..

    • Steve says:

      05:15pm | 15/08/11

      They should have sent the English cricketers to confront the rioters. No one can hit theur bowlers.

    • Alastair Cook says:

      07:04pm | 15/08/11

      You Aussies are absolutely pathetic at cricket, I was boring myself to death in the ashes series constantly scoring double centuries, the captain of Australia should in essence be a real man who shows no emotion and drinks a shit load of beer. Then again there is a reason why we bring saffers on to our side, because they’re real men with square jaws.

    • Steve says:

      07:20pm | 15/08/11

      At least you can stop saying that Australia is full of convicts. We have seen the vision dear old england if full of convicts.

    • PW says:

      07:29pm | 15/08/11

      Way way back in the mists of time, there were three batsmen who vied for the mantle of world’s best. Tendulkar, Lara, and Ponting. Lara was always technically the best, and prettiest to watch when on song, but his failures outnumbered his successes, even if his successes were greater than anyone else’s, and finally he retired from the game. Tendulkar went through a huge slump around the time Ponting’s Test average hit 60. Indians would claim Tendulkar was as good as Ponting, although stats said otherwise.

      Then Tendulkar finally came out of his slump, and Ponting entered his, equally debilitating. As`record after record fell to the bat of Tendulkar, the Little Master, Indians claimed he was greater even than Bradman, although stats said otherwise. Even to an Aussie, comparing Ponting to the Indian champion seemed silly.

      But wheels have a habit of turning, and now we see Tendulkar powerless against the might of England (who would have thought?), while Ponting carves them up in the subcontinent.

      I do hope we see a Ponting renaissance in the coming years, the likes of that of Tendulkar over the past 4 years or so. For no other reason than to stick it up the Indians.

    • Steve says:

      12:54pm | 16/08/11

      PW. Tendulkar’s “return to form” was when he went down to number 6. Ponting’s recent slump was while still batting at 3. It is not an apples with apples comparison.

      I think Ponting could make a lot of runs at 6 but who would bat 3 Clarke?/ I don’t think so

    • DRS says:

      11:50am | 17/08/11

      @PW:
      News Flash: Tendulkar is the greatest batsman in modern cricket. I would not compare Tendulkar with Bradman becasue it is stupid to compare two batsman who are as different as chalk and cheese. Ponting is not great. He is ‘Good’ but long way away from being ‘Great’. I would rate Jacques Kallis above Ponting any day.

    • Mahhrat says:

      08:59pm | 15/08/11

      Ant, we stopped caring about cricket when we realised the ICC was owned by the Indians.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      11:49pm | 15/08/11

      Yeah me too in a way. Bad business all that

    • DRS says:

      11:49am | 17/08/11

      Err.. Indians are good at making money. BCCI is the richest Cricket board. So s*ck it up. It is all about money after all.

    • Max Redlands says:

      11:35pm | 15/08/11

      @insand - oh do get off - don’t take my word for it see wiki p = “ALP mythology says the first party branch was founded at a meeting of striking pastoral workers under a ghost gum tree (the “Tree of Knowledge”) in Barcaldine, Queensland in 1891 . The Balmain, New South Wales branch of the party also claims to be the oldest in Australia. The party as a serious electoral force dates from 1891 in New South Wales, 1893 in Queensland and South Australia, and later in the other colonies. In New South Wales in 1891, the first election contested by Labour candidates (as Labor was spelt at the time – see Etymology), 35 of 141 seats were won by Labour candidates.[1] In 1899, Anderson Dawson formed a minority Labour government in Queensland, the first in the world, which lasted one week”
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Labor_Party

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter