Among the many hazards that you might encounter during a long overseas trip, perhaps the worst one is starting to sound like the Lonely Planet.

Oh Honey! Look how cute all the sick children are! Picture: AFP

I don’t mean just quoting the guidebooks’ neat little factoids and pat judgments in place of any other real conversation or insight, something my wife and I have been reduced to doing for the past few months of our world trip.

A more serious sign of the malady is when you start to refer to yourself as an “independent traveller”, the standard description the books employ for their readership.

The “independent traveller” is obviously an intrepid adventurer who experiences the authentic country by staying longer, living cheaper and using the same services as the locals.

In other words a cheap arse tourist, more commonly known as a backpacker, a species rightly viewed with some distaste as basically the itinerant unemployed.

It is no doubt true that proper tourists do luxuriate in a rarefied resort-wall-cosseted unreality of chaperoned air conditioned day trips followed by poolside drinks and then the buffet containing a smattering of local dishes prepared for international tastes.

Not for them the authenticity of trying to puzzle out the Lonely Planet maps with their numbered dots on spaghetti tangles of unnamed street outlines, generally more frustrating to follow than Collingwood or St George during finals season.

Nor the authenticity of lugging bags up vertiginous stairs to a room the size of a modest walk-in closet where the decoration mainly consists of differing stains on the sheets and the bathroom is indeed “shared” with a thriving ecosystem of insect and sometimes other animal life.

Still it is a mistake to imagine the minor inconveniences of slumming abroad equate to some sort of more genuine travel experience when backpackers often exist in their own little separate sphere just as surely as their more monied tour group counterparts.

Where cheap arse tourists go, a hospitality sector invariably materialises to accommodate them.

The backpacker’s floating world topography is instantly recognisable to anyone who has been to Khao San Road in Bangkok, with its hundred hostels and no star hotels, banana pancake English menu cafes, second hand book shops and single desk travel agents.

It also noticeable that when following the Lonely Planet’s suggested attractions you start to see the same “independent” travellers working through the list as surely as if gripping a guide rope.

The tour groups will get chaperoned serenely past while you and those familiar faces book in hand frown furiously at that most ominous of Lonely Planet directions: “You won’t be able to miss…”

Where the Lonely Planet allows its “independent travel” ethos to turn into full-blown conceit is with its trumpeted commitment to “sustainable” travel.

It is arguable that any international jet travel for such a frivolous purpose as tourism is an unsustainable CO2 poke in the eye for Mother Earth, even if you plant a few trees in penance.

For insufferable smugness Lonely Planet Morocco is particularly annoying.

Under the heading “Travelling Responsibly” the book piously intones: “as always, we encourage you to consider the impact your visit will have on both the global environment and the local economies, cultures and ecosystems.”

The book is suffused with indignation at tourist developments, with golf courses being a special bugbear because they stretch water reserves.

In contrast admiration is directed at any local cooperative that grows (of course) organic food or sells handmade things to put money back into the community.

Well and good but a golf-playing tourist as opposed to purely a roadside craft-buying one is likely to put a lot more money into the local economy.

This leads to the suspicion that when the Lonely Planet talks about travel being sustainable, what they mean is that while alleviation of poverty is desirable, it shouldn’t come at the expense of picturesque exoticism to be gawked at by leisured Westerners.

Sustainable can start to sound a bit like subsistence.

The resultant jobs from higher end tourism might even provide a way for local people to aspire to more than sustaining their current living standards.

They might even aspire to one day be overseas tourists themselves, even cheap arse ones, doing the gawking and enjoying meaningful interaction with foreign hostel staff, bus drivers and waiters.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

77 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.Chong says:

      08:06am | 06/07/10

      David, golf sux, and is responsible for dramatically changing landscapes and micro enviroments, as well as a huge waste of water.
      Golf courses should be opened up as public parks.

    • The Ninth Green says:

      08:18am | 06/07/10

      But then what would President Obama do with his time?

    • Austin 3:16 says:

      08:35am | 06/07/10

      As long as you don’t mind ducking when I yell “fore” that sounds fine with me.

    • jackie says:

      08:51am | 06/07/10

      Golf courses also act to conserve biodiversity in ways you could never understand. Maybe you should widen your views a bit rather than sprouting some ridiculous socialist mantra.

    • centurion48 says:

      08:53am | 06/07/10

      @T.Chong: Only your first sentence was accurate but the same could be said about any built environment. If you want public parks then dig up some suburban roads and have walking and cycling paths in lieu. Golf is at least a sport that gets people off their bum and exercising.

      @David: Your last two patagraphs sum up Australia nicely.

    • T.Chong says:

      09:07am | 06/07/10

      Yes Jackie .Now there is a fellow Fabian Prime Minister, the slow socialisation of everything, especially golf courses, are to be nationalised- its a policy from her uni days.
      Great sense of humor that Conservatives claim ( despite lack of proof) to have.
      No Aitch B, not serios, I just luv rankling some far right bloggers (see Jackie)

    • iansand says:

      10:32am | 06/07/10

      Jackie - Bad fashion is not biodiversity.

    • jackie says:

      10:38am | 06/07/10

      Of course chongy, you weren’t serious about it. It was a joke.

      Well, it became a joke as soon as anyone pointed out the sheer stupidity of your statement.

      But keep trying. Workchoices anyone? How about dog whistling redhead PMs? But no, they don’t exist do they?

    • Aitch B says:

      08:37am | 06/07/10

      Are you serious, Chongy??

      Water falls on the gold course, runs into dams and is then put back on to the golf course albeit in a controlled manner.

      And let’s not forget the the hundreds, perhaps thousands of water birds that congregate around and in those dams. One of the joys of playing golf is seeing the wildlife.

    • Sherekahn says:

      09:24am | 06/07/10

      Sounds like the next ideal camping tour of the world.
      A trip around a country’s golf courses!

    • Elphaba says:

      08:57am | 06/07/10

      There is a compromise - do a Gecko’s tour.  You save money on the unimportant stuff, like accommodation and food, and still have a guide to help you out with the tricky bits.  The tour group is small, and you use local transport.  It’s brilliant!

      Egypt for 16 days in October - I can’t wait!

    • marley says:

      09:21am | 06/07/10

      Umm, believe me, food is not “unimportant” in Egypt.  The “Pharoah’s revenge” can be a nasty consequence of eating poorly prepared food, food that has been left too long in a chafing dish, or food that hasn’t been cooked at all.  Trust me. I know.

    • Elphaba says:

      09:54am | 06/07/10

      That’s why there’s a guide - to recommend good food that doesn’t break the bank.

      I did the same thing in Asia, with no problems.

    • DJ says:

      10:38am | 06/07/10

      yes but Asia is very different to the Middle East food and water quality wise, my friend went to Egypt and her tour guide recommended a shot of vodka in the morning to line her tummy from bad foods and the one day she didn’t do it she spent the whole day on the toilet lol

    • DJ says:

      10:42am | 06/07/10

      take plenty of immodium

    • NEFFA says:

      03:20pm | 06/07/10

      and gastrolyte

    • marley says:

      03:31pm | 06/07/10

      Personally, I found beer a good preventative (except the bottle that had a slug in the bottom).  It’s not great for brushing your teeth, though.  Doesn’t go well with the toothpaste.

    • Elphaba says:

      04:38pm | 06/07/10

      Eww, beer and toothpaste!  Yeah, not good at the best of times - if you’ve brushed your teeth too soon before a beer it’s a bit gross.

    • DJ says:

      09:28am | 07/07/10

      have the beer before you brush your teeth with bottled water, but make sure you take lots of immodium the last thing you want to do is miss out on anything because you are stuck on the loo

    • Isabel says:

      09:16am | 06/07/10

      “The “independent traveller” is obviously an intrepid adventurer who experiences the authentic country by staying longer, living cheaper and using the same services as the locals.”

      Not this OAP who, when in UK for 3 months, saw the country from (a) long distance train pre-paid; (b) within National Trust working holidays in real countryside; (c) scoured the Net for affordable B&B; (d) used YHA hostels with great satisfaction (except in Scotland!)

      “In other words a cheap arse tourist, more commonly known as a backpacker, a species rightly viewed with some distaste as basically the itinerant unemployed.”

      In other words, the frugally retired now slowly touring OZ living cheaper and getting to know the locals and put some money into their economy.

    • Muttley says:

      10:46am | 06/07/10

      if you are living cheaper, then you cant be putting much money into the local economy eh?

    • Isabel says:

      12:44pm | 06/07/10

      Muttley,
      Surely anything is better than nothing? Spreading my pension around as far as it will go. Better than maintaining a 3 bedroom house occupied by one person, I sold up and got mobile. So that which a hardware store would have got in one country town, now lots of country towns get a little bit here and there. All adds up.

    • Gregg says:

      03:39pm | 06/07/10

      Good on you too Isabel, the way to go for many.
      Southwell seems to have gone well south with his views of backpackers, lumping them all together and then for some reason or other having a great dislike of the Lonely Planet and it’s not the only travel resource.
      He may even be surprised to know that there are five star eco resorts about and obviously knows little of the volunteering experiences that many independent travellers do look for.
      Not everybody has the funds nor desire for in resort and escorted tour travelling.

    • JM says:

      09:23am | 06/07/10

      Wrong. Independent travellers, if that’s what you wish to call them, stay much longer than five-star tourists, and end up spending a comparable amount of money. The money they do spend does not go to foreign-owned tour companies, western resort chains and the like. Instead it is spent on local buses, local hotels (some of which are lovely, thank you) and local tour operators, meaning a much greater percentage of the money spent stays in the local economy.

      The kind of tourists the author is referring to certainly exist, but only in some towns in some countries geared towards their desired attractions, look at Vang Vieng in Laos for a prime example. You won’t find them in rural China (where there is an intimidating language barrier), Malaysia (where many vices are severely punished) or in Indonesia outside Bali (where there is a perceived threat of terrorism).

      Give me a chicken bus any day…

    • Muttley says:

      10:48am | 06/07/10

      Wrong. Independant travellers spend a lot more time to spend a lot less money.

    • Roja says:

      01:27pm | 06/07/10

      It depends on the destination - in western countries they tend to work thus contributing to the economy as they also spend it there.  In less developed countries they aren’t supplementing their income so there is no net positive gain, however there is no net negative loss either. 

      I’d say diversity is good - having both types ensures everyone gets a share of the money.

    • DJ says:

      09:24am | 06/07/10

      “Independant touring” merely refers to travelling on your own, be it in a hostel or 5 star resort it just means you are not travelling with an escorted tour. You don’t have to backpack although Lonely Planet is more marketed to young backpackers, maybe you should have got better guide books if you didn’t want to do budget

    • Steve_of_Cornubia says:

      09:26am | 06/07/10

      I never have liked the poverty voyeurs who love to traipse through poor towns, ‘observing’ the shocking conditions some people live in, then sanctifying their own actions by claiming this somehow helps the poor wretches. If they truly want to help, organisations exist for precisely that purpose - just donate the money you were going to spend on your air ticket and shut the hell up.

      Oh, and I gave up welcoming long-forgotten ‘friends’ into my home (a.k.a. cheapskate tourists) years ago, when it dawned on my that it was my spare bed they were interested in, not me.

    • DJ says:

      12:30pm | 06/07/10

      The organisations you refer to do not always give the entire amount to the village, the vouyers as you call them have paid a tour guide from that area and a good percent go back into the local economy, some escorted tour companies like GAP and Gecko’s actually have Voluntour programs that have a week of volunteering ie building a school or well for drinking water and then touring to see the rest of the area and more money goes into those villages in particular rather than accross the board and them only seeing a small percentage

    • Macca says:

      09:28am | 06/07/10

      And how would Tiger Woods manage his 18 holes eveyday?

    • stephen says:

      02:11pm | 06/07/10

      A hole in one is a hole new ball-game ?

    • martinX says:

      02:54pm | 06/07/10

      Macca says: “And how would Tiger Woods manage his 18 holes eveyday?”

      And how would he be able to play golf, too?

    • Sherekahn says:

      09:40am | 06/07/10

      “And when I tell them, how wonderful it was, they’ll never believe me! No they’ll never believe me.”
      Eat yer hearts out, we did it all in the 60’s.
      I remember frying our breakfast at the back of our Mini-Van in a St Germain street while ‘der cops’ had some Algerian Terrorists leaning with their hands high on the wall 3 mts from us, while their guns covered them.
      You don’t read that in “Planet Earth.”

    • DJ says:

      12:23pm | 06/07/10

      Just FYI things in the world have changed in 40 years and the book is called “Lonely Planet” not Planet Earth”

    • AdamC says:

      09:43am | 06/07/10

      When my boyfriend and I spent a few weeks in Europe last year, we were a little put out that all the other tourists we saw were twenty-plus years older than us. But then, for all the Lonely Planet guff, most backpacker-type tourists spend their time either carousing in bars and nightclubs or sleeping off their hangovers.

      There is obviously a happy medium between organised tour tedium and booze-all-night backpacking.

      On the subject of Lonely Planet guidebooks, I am a little sceptical. In particular, the food and beverage recommendations are highly inconsistent. Trip Advisor and the like are much better for that kind of thing.

    • Anne71 says:

      12:43pm | 06/07/10

      @AdamC - “When my boyfriend and I spent a few weeks in Europe last year, we were a little put out that all the other tourists we saw were twenty-plus years older than us” - oh, how terrible! How dare older people want to visit the same places as you? There should be an age limit, dammit - if you’re over 30 you shouldn’t be allowed in. Stupid old people! They should just stay home! (In case you’re wondering, yes, I am being sarcastic)

    • AdamC says:

      10:08am | 07/07/10

      Anne71 - I think if you have to say ‘I’m being sarcastic’ at the end of the post, it’s a case of back to the drawing board.

      And I fear your touchiness has more to do with your own anxieties than my comment. I was’t suggesting old people shouldn’t travel, I was suggesting my boyfriend and I aren’t as cool as we think we are.

    • Anne71 says:

      12:21pm | 07/07/10

      AdamC, I in my turn fear you may be reading more into my comment than is actually there. It was meant to be a lighthearted dig at the “twenty years older than us” observation.  And the “yes, I was being sarcastic” bit was a Homer Simpson parody.  If both went over your head, I apologise.

    • Graham says:

      09:52am | 06/07/10

      Lonely Planet - the world’s largest Contiki trip!

    • Leah says:

      10:14am | 06/07/10

      The average backpacker in Australia stays much longer than any other sort of tourist (excluding international students, depending how you choose to classify them) and travels further within the country, spreading their foreign exchange investment beyond the capitals, to regional areas that need it most.
      Overall, the average backpacker spends more money within any particular country than the average tourist.  This is why Australia, and many other countries have specifically chosen to target backpackers and bring them to Australia.
      As well as the benefits ‘backpackers’ bring, there are also challenges presented by standard tourists; take for example Fiji- while there are small wealthy tourist areas, these areas are made up of foreign owned hotels and attractions, leading to little benefit to local areas.  The places that backpackers stay in Fiji are more likely to be locally owned, and directly help the local community.
      Obvioiusly not all backpackers are good, or all ‘tourists’ bad, but there are benefits to backpackers that go beyond the obvious ‘cheapskate’ image.

    • Muttley says:

      10:54am | 06/07/10

      Backpackers make their money last. Understandable if you are planning along trip with limited resources. So this “foreign exchange capitol” you speak of is usually limited to dry noodles, backpacker accomodation and one or two local ales. Then in addition to this a good portion will try to pick up work through the cash economy. I have no problem with them and have enjoyed many nights swapping tales with thristy travellers. But it is amazing how long they can make a beer last…

    • NEFFA says:

      12:17pm | 06/07/10

      try living for a month in Bondi and then tell me how wonderful backpackers are.
      After the first or second time you are accosted in the street by a drunken english person, you might not be so welcoming.

    • DJ says:

      12:32pm | 06/07/10

      But you can always tell the British backpackers, they’re the ones who are bright as lobsters as they underestimated the Australian sun, mwa hahahahaha

    • BK says:

      07:52am | 07/07/10

      We rip off backpackers disgracefully. The price and conditions in hostels and their treatment in fruit-picking jobs are equally appalling.

    • DJ says:

      09:24am | 07/07/10

      Backpackers shouldn’t be working here at all unless they are on a working visa, the ones that do the fruit picking most of them are working illegally so they get what they deserve, who cares how much they are paid if they’re not supposed to?

    • Graham S says:

      10:46am | 06/07/10

      As a first time visitor to Kuta, Bali in 1974 it was then a simple fishing village with locals repairing nets on the beach, 4 dirt roads, a handful of shops serving the locals and a beach to kill for. Now, thanks to tourism,it is a God forsaken rat-hole with fast food outlets, department stores night clubs and a road and drainage system unchanged from 1974,The only thing tourism did for Kuta is make the Generals wealthy whilst self satisfied, grubby unkept “travellers” smugly brag how cheap they live and bargain down a local kid by 50c on a t-shirt thinking they’re oh so clever whilst patronisingly prattle on what cute people the Balinese are. If you wish to benefit the local economy, go to a local school and donate a $100.00 worth of material to a class or buy a student a new uniform

    • DJ says:

      12:25pm | 06/07/10

      Unfortunately you can’t stop progress and as Tourism is their main source of income you can hardly be surprised that everything has gone ‘western’, a lot of the fast food joints and resorts employ local people who use the money for their families, now if these places weren’t there what would they do for work and money?

    • crizza says:

      10:50am | 06/07/10

      sounds like you’ve had a pay rise David - Punch must be paying you well. Being cheap has its own advantages and it usually works on the equation of money Vs time. If you’re young and free, do it on the cheap, take your time, have some fun and meet heaps of people again and again on the trails. And I bet you’ll also meet more locals and make a few real friends as well.

    • derm says:

      10:53am | 06/07/10

      Here’s tip Sherlock. Lonely Planet is redundant. There is now so much information and resources out there that you DON’T have to resort to reading that shite publication or comparing your experiences to it. Even the cheap arse backpackers have figured this out.

    • Peter says:

      12:06pm | 06/07/10

      The best way to save money on accomodation in Europe is to not book any accomodation at all. When you arrive at your destination, be it an airport or a train station, you go to the tourist information offices and tell them you want some accomodation. They ask you how much you want to spend, you tell them 30 euro, and they’ll give you some last minute deal in the heart of the city in a place that would have cost 3 or 4 times as much if you booked it yourself. I did this for 2 months without once pre booking a hotel and saved a fortune..

    • Gregg says:

      04:39pm | 06/07/10

      If you luck out that way Peter, there’s always a site dedicated to sleepinginairports .
      And then even Switzerland can be cheap with a Schlaf im Strom if you do not mind a well equipped farmers barn and a hearty farm breke.

    • Peter says:

      01:13pm | 08/07/10

      Mate, i was paying 30 or 40 euros for places that were going for 80 or 100 euro a night. I never lucked out (in 2 months) . It seems these tourist offices know of empty rooms all over the city.. Some with room service etc..

      At first its a bit nerve racking not having pre booked but once you realise you can snap up accomodation pretty easily and cheaply, its the way to go.. These hotels would rather get your 30 euros than nothing at all..

    • Bruno says:

      01:01pm | 06/07/10

      unless you experience it like the locals, you will never get a true appreciation of where you are, fancy hotels are just an excuse for battlers to feel like a celebrity for a few weeks, i suggest laying off the celebrity mags and get back to your roots

    • 6c legs says:

      01:03pm | 06/07/10

      Am so glad that the author isn’t indulging in any of the smugness that he accuses the Lonely Planeteers of…

      bugger going OS to “make my money do good” - I wanna be able to see this countries interior, AND have my spending $s benefit OUR indigenous people. without resorting to resorts

    • DJ says:

      01:50pm | 06/07/10

      It’s not about making your money do good, it’s about experiencing what this planet has to offer in range of culture and other benefits seeing how other people live to give you perspective about your own life. It’s about going to Uganda and seeing those beautiful Gorilla’s in their natural environment, going on safari in East/South Africa and seeing these brilliant animals in the wild. It’s about going to Vietnam and hearing about the history from the war and the fall out from the “agent orange” fiasco and how truely far flung the damages have gone. Going to China and seeing the Great Wall the only structure that can be seen from space, the Terracotta Warriors thousands of clay warriors all with a different face that have survived for centuries, going to Egypt and seeing the Pyramids, these awesome structures that were built thousands of years ago, to Western or Eastern Europe to see how war has shaped the countries and also the different cultures compared to ours, and I guess the Greek Islands to soak up some rays lol

      This is why I have and will continue to travel OS and why I will encourage my children to do it on their own and take them with me so they can experience these true wonders

    • 6c legs says:

      03:34pm | 06/07/10

      “DJ”, no kidding?! I had no idea that why people travel is to experience other cultures, or to see things that they can’t see in their own country!
      I thought it was just so that they can be one up on their “friends” who can’t afford to…


      .../sarc…

    • DJ says:

      03:56pm | 06/07/10

      @6c - hey if you can’t afford to don’t go getting narky at me, I’m not one of your ‘friends’ but that’s why they have camping tours, cheap as chips and you get right close and personal. I have travelled more than most of my friends but I don’t lord it over them, you have some serious issues, maybe you should get some more friends as boring as you?

      Your post mentioned nothing about that you had no money, just crapping on about you want your money to benefit this country blah, blah woof woof.

      I hope your friends get to travel the world and leave you behind if you are this bitter

    • Razor says:

      01:55pm | 06/07/10

      They never tell you how bad these places smell.

    • JoeC says:

      02:16pm | 06/07/10

      The Lonely Planet has well and truly reached its use-by date. When it was first created by Tony Wheeler it was something different, and not necessarily out to make money. It was all about introducing far-flung places and new experiences to adventurous types.

      A few years ago I attended a talk by Tony where he stated that they would not be producing, for example, the Eastern Russian book because it simply “did not make enough money”. This is typical of their bulk outputs now, virtually a setpiece tour for backpackers on the cheap and baby-boomers denying their own age progression. Low on information and offering little more than a low-end guide to hostels, they need to provide more depth rather than breadth.

    • DJ says:

      02:51pm | 06/07/10

      You also can’t “backpack” through Russia, due to the visa requirements you need to have every night accounted for, you can’t pick up and leave or stay longer on a whim and the accommodation has to provide a letter of introduction and you need to have the visa for only the dates you will be in the country

    • Anna says:

      06:16pm | 06/07/10

      Not necessarily true DJ. While you do have to put thought into the Russian visa process, and it generally involves someone inviting you for a non-tourist visa, it’s not nearly as strict as it seems. You can’t stay longer, and often you can’t re-enter, but you certainly don’t need every night accounted for. I’d highly recommend the study visa and just sign up for a quick course in Russian at one of the educating bodies (you’ll need it) and then spend the rest of the time travelling around.
      But the Russian lonely planet is atrocious - most of the places in it are closed.

    • JoeC says:

      06:37pm | 06/07/10

      DJ-Well, that is the attitude precisely of lonely planet now. Too hard.

      It is precisely the opposite of their original publications for South East Asia.

      Why not tell people how to travel through Russia? Job Tvojemadj!

    • DJ says:

      09:26am | 07/07/10

      Joe - I am not saying it’s too hard don’t do it, if you want something then you will work hard and jump through as many hoops as you need to to do it, I would love to go to Russia, it’s on my list I wont be backpacking however

    • Max Spaniel says:

      02:36pm | 06/07/10

      I’m a tight arse traveller because it’s all I can afford.

    • Emma says:

      02:44pm | 06/07/10

      Wow, talk about a rant. I am an independant traveller. In France you can lease a brand new car and take it anywhere within the EU. You can even drop it off in another country for about $500 extra. 3 months will set you back about $5000 and it comes with insurance, road side assistance etc (they then sell them as ‘used’ cars after to avoid paying tax). No tours or luxury resorts for me. B&B’s all the way (3 stars anywhere from $30-$100 AUD p/n). I avoid drunken contiki tours and get to go at my own pace… I take with me all the guide books and ensure my lap top is connected to the interwebs so I can cross check what I read. Easy! I can get the ‘independant’ experience, see the back streets, get to know the locals etc without being labeled a ‘backpacker’. yay for me smile

    • DJ says:

      03:09pm | 06/07/10

      A Eurail pass would have been cheaper and got you to the same places

    • Emma says:

      09:06pm | 06/07/10

      But without being able to go through the small towns in the countryside. I travel for the country side, not the city. The train goes past the bits I am trying to see!... driving myself and my partner through the alps / the scottish highlands and stopping at a tiny inn (on a whim) that has been there for 600 years is worth the money.

    • DJ says:

      08:17am | 07/07/10

      Ah fair enough then

    • Schartos says:

      03:11pm | 06/07/10

      Personally I like Lonely Planet, however I take it with a pinch of salt. On the road it can be handy, but if I’m planning I tend to do most of my research on-line. Trip Advisor is pretty good.

      I’m 31 in a well paid job and could afford to stay in luxury accommodation if I wanted to. However I prefer the backpacker lifestyle (though I am accused of being a ‘champagne backpacker’). I find the more expensive hotels and tours are more comfortable but often a lot less fun. To be honest, it’s usually an older crowd and rightly or wrongly, I personally find them less fun.

      Anyway, isn’t any tourism good for an economy?

      Golf is great. English backpackers aren’t too bad (especially in Darwin as they tend to be terrified the whole time).

      Explore onwards my friends, any which way you choose.

    • TC says:

      03:15pm | 06/07/10

      What an ill informed,one eyed, stuck up, self righteous load of crap.

      Money money money. It is complete ignorance and uniquely western arrogance to assume the position that by spending money you are doing good. It’s utter rubbish and a culturally stupid assumption. Unfortunately this cultural ignorance and arrogance is rampant in lucky countries blessed with natural resources they can sell at inflated prices to the rest of the world.

      5 star tourists are far more likely to lining the pockets of the corrupt and encouraging merciless developers who ram through developments over the top of the less powerful. They are more liekly to be increasing the divide between rich and poor. They are more likely to be supporting corrupt and undesirable governments, police forces and armies.

      As if environmental impact is upon your travel agenda. Try considering the environmental impact that these development and hotels you frequent have with the blissful air con running 24/7.

      Try considering the impact you have on the local families forced off their farming plots. Land that is very likely the support of generations of the same family. Try considering the children of those locals who forced into labour because the family has lost its income and cant feed itself or eductate the kids. These same kids you deny the priviledge of cleaning your shoes in the name of preventing child labour when the $1 would feed them.

      Try considering the “jobs created” which drag people from their families and so generously pay a poor ex farmer a princely $40 a month to slave in a pit you wouldnt spit in.

      But you gave a few bucks to charity right? So youre a gooood fellow and can now feel virtuous and tell everyone how you relieved poverty.

      Obviously the success and popularity of books like Lonley Planet have had an impact but after 7 years living in SE Asia Ive witnessed any number of wankers like this author doing far worse than the grunge back packer. All with this same self righteous ignorance combined with the accompanying arrogance thay they know what’s good for the people and the world.

      Youre an embarrassment to yourself.

    • Max Spaniel says:

      05:39pm | 06/07/10

      Touche TC , well said and long live the backpackers of the world who aren’t worried about how they are perceived by some elements of society. Some of the most poignant and memorable moments of my travel experiences have occured because of low budget choices and LP tips over the last 30 years. Places I would never have discovered,people I wouldn’t have met ,excitement and danger I’d never have encountered.

    • Horthy says:

      09:24pm | 06/07/10

      One of the great things about traveling is you (generally) learn a few things about yourself and those you travel with.

      How about we let each traveller work out how they want to travel instead of stipulating anything?

    • Mao says:

      11:33pm | 06/07/10

      Backpacking ..... I loved it and I don’t care what other people thinks of me ...  Life is just too short to worry about this little glitch

    • Tomas says:

      01:05am | 07/07/10

      There is certainly some hypocrisy in lonely planets advice, however, it seems as   Though the author is a little too preoccupied with the negatives of something that can nevertheless be a great tool, regardless of one’s intentions or bank balance. Maybe the author simply has in mind to justify travelling with complete disregard for others, the environment and money concerns, because they have become embittered by personal experience.

    • BK says:

      08:03am | 07/07/10

      Its the smugness that comes with describing one’s self as a “traveller” that is the problem. No type of tourism is any more authentic than any other.

    • G says:

      01:00am | 08/07/10

      Why does everyone treat travel as a competitive sport?
      “My way is the best and everyone else is wrong”.
      Most travellers are open to new and different things but seem pretty closed minded towards other people who travel in a different way to them.

    • Peter says:

      02:54pm | 08/07/10

      The lonely planet only shows you the “tourist paths”. These are places where you spend 5 euro for an orange juice instead of 2. All the places mentioned in these books just rip off tourists. Lonely Planet Guide is good to have, but don’t go earting where this book suggests or don’t hang around those areas for food or accomodation if you don’t want to get ripped off. If you stray off the tourist path, you get better food, better quality at a normal prices. Not like the 30 (or Aus $55) euros some joint in Amsterdam tried to make me pay for some noodles. I walked about a couple of blocks away and got a beautiful dinner for Aus $25..

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter