I’m going to say it – gay people have it easy.

Who are we kidding, there aren't that many good looking people on Blendr. Picture: Blendr

The homosexual community may not have many rights when it comes to matters of the heart but in terms of negotiating bedroom bureaucracy things are so much more… uncomplicated. At least in the social networking space. 

The other day I joined Blendr, the “straight” version of gay hook-up app Grindr, in the hopes it would make a good story.

I wanted to see if the new incarnation of the reportedly invaluable GPS/social networking Grindr app - used to arrange trysts with nearby users - would work for us straighty-180s.

But I’ve started to realise it doesn’t, because frankly, when it comes to our bedrooms we’re just not that honest about what we want.

(Caveat: As a happily engaged woman I can’t say I was really in it for the “fun and good times” that my profile suggested).

Grindr is great because it’s a straight-forward, no-nonsense casual sex tool.

In Grindr land it’s okay to say “come around at eight, take your shirt off, don’t talk and then leave.”

Blendr on the other hand is still playing mind games. It’s a hook-up app masquerading as a dating site.

In the interests of journalism I set up a fake Grindr account to compare the reaction rate, and the content of communications.

About an hour after I completed my profile, uploading a photo of a handsome but plain man I found on Google Images, I was being propositioned. What do I like? Am I interested in hooking up? When? Where?

“Do you have a hairy chest?” wrote one user.

“Top, bottom or versatile?” asked another. It’s a brave new world out there in Grindr land. Much braver than Blendr.

I’ve been on Blendr for three days now also under a pseudonym and fake photo. And though one or two users asked if I would be interested in meeting up, you know - hypothetically - not a single user has manned-up and arranged an actual date.

On Blendr there are a lot of mixed messages. Though it’s marketed as a GPS dating/social-networking site, clearly most users have something else in mind.

The gender split is pretty uneven.

When I joined there were about 28 profiles of men in various stages of undress and about seven curious women, mostly fully clothed, who were probably just looking for someone to take them to dinner and listen to what they have to say.

Guys hear: “sweet, an easier way to get laid”. The girls hear: ‘oh good I can do all my dating from my smartphone, I won’t have to join RSVP.com.’

Here’s a sample of some of the messages I’ve received so far on Blendr:

“You tell me where you want it and more than happy to give it to you (sic),” wrote one user. 

“Hey gorgeous, you looking for some fun?” said another.

One user wrote: “Mebbe after (work) we could grab a drink ?.”

That’s about as saucy as it gets. I received just as many messages containing a simple “hi” or “what movies R U into?”

I’ve spent a great portion of my time on Blendr texting about my hobbies, my favourite movies and how long I’ve been using Blendr for (the digital version of “come here often?”). Except instead of communicating with just one person I’m repeating the same lie en-masse to about 25 people at a time.

Rather than being an easy, simple, more convenient and honest app than conventional dating sites, it just felt time consuming, arduous and dishonest.

Since I joined Blendr I’ve been receiving about four messages an hour. At work. When I’m at the gym or getting ready for bed. It’s exhausting and a little intrusive.

Nothing says “come hither” like the sound of your mobile phone vibrating against the desk every few minutes.

Not one user has so far been game enough to write “let’s hop on the good foot and do the bad thing”.

Though I would never agree to such a tryst I envy the person on Blendr honest enough to call it what it is. I might even buy them a beer, so long as they promise to keep their distance.

This is the problem with the new app: it needs to decide what it is.

It may not be in the best interests of the creators for the world to know that Blendr was created by the same company as Grindr. But the company, Nearby Buddy Finder, haven’t done much to differentiate it either. Even the layout is the same as Grindr.

What have I concluded from all this?

That straight people could have more fun if they could face up to their own desires. That Grindr is possibly one of the most honest smart-phone apps ever created.

And that it turns out there are more excruciating things than awkward first dates and drunkenly flirting with strangers at a club. Join Blendr and a whole new world of tedious interactions will open up to you.

110 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Super D says:

      05:10am | 13/10/11

      I’m not surprised that there are more men than women on the hetero version.  I’ve never heard a woman describe a situation where she has been unable to obtain no strings attached sex.  Romance and commitment are a much greater challenge.

    • Elle says:

      11:01am | 13/10/11

      Never? I pursued no strings (in person, not online) for about 10 months… and almost every guy wanted something more! Beginning to think the ‘all men are virile and just want sex’ story is nothing more than a myth. And trust me, I didn’t want romance or commitment. Good to know gender stereotypes haven’t changed much.

    • Tubesteak says:

      12:02pm | 13/10/11

      Elle
      Women can fake orgasms but men can fake entire relationships. We do it so we can have a regular supply of sex. It’s the ol’ a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. If you offer yourself up for easy sex then a man thinks “hey, this chick is low maintenance and up for it. That’s the perfect woman! Might grab hold tight!”

    • neo says:

      12:41pm | 13/10/11

      Thanks Elle! We’re not all virile. I’d ask you out for some fun, but I’m one of the “seeking relationship” males as well raspberry

    • Paul Murray says:

      01:49pm | 13/10/11

      “Not one user has so far been game enough to write “let’s hop on the good foot and do the bad thing”.”

      The dishonesty!

      “Though I would never agree to such a tryst ...”

      Fuuuuuuuuu… ! And you wonder why the hero guys are timid and dishonest. It’s because women are full of shit.

    • Kika` says:

      02:00pm | 13/10/11

      Tubesteak - tell me about it. Spent 9 years in a ‘relationship’ with my ex. He faked it the entire time!

    • Kleia says:

      02:59pm | 13/10/11

      Tubesteak - so, if that’s the case, why is it that so many men in committed relationships are continuously moaning that they’re not getting ENOUGH sex?

    • Hicks says:

      03:10pm | 13/10/11

      So women want the first message to be, “wana f#%!?”

      Done. Guarenteed I will be rejected!

    • PsychoHyena says:

      05:51pm | 13/10/11

      @Kleia because once a woman “owns” you there is no need for her to continue having sex, except when she’s ready for kids.

    • Erick says:

      05:13am | 13/10/11

      You created two fake profiles, and now you’re complaining about dishonesty?

    • Chris_D says:

      07:00am | 13/10/11

      I call BS on the whole article.  It started ok, until the second line, “The homosexual community may not have many rights when it comes to matters of the heart”.....

      nayway, I read these quotes in another article yesterday, “You tell me where you want it and more than happy to give it to you (sic),”  Possibly from the author. It’s hard to know given she makes fake accounts and shows no integrity.

      But then she says, “Not one user has so far been game enough to write “let’s hop on the good foot and do the bad thing”.
      Though I would never agree to such a tryst I envy the person on Blendr honest enough to call it what it is.”

      Um, see “your” quote above.  I think they’ve called it what it is, and I am calling BS on your article.

    • Ghost says:

      07:30am | 13/10/11

      It’s probably paid advertising.

    • Craig says:

      03:48pm | 13/10/11

      Yep - and I hope she asked permission to use the guys photo, rather than just stealing it. Did you consider that he might charge you with defamation for misrepresenting him? Maybe his wife’s sister joins, sees him, and then reports back that he’s a cheating SOB….  well done, you just ruined a marriage.

    • S.L says:

      05:26am | 13/10/11

      When I was first separated I tried a dating site. I don’t know why really I wasn’t that interested in women anymore but a happily divorced work mate told me to give it a try.  Within 5 minutes of joining I had a lady from Indonesia demanding I only talk to her. I played the game for about 30 minutes even complementing the obviously fake pic of herself she sent. As soon as the sob story about money started I deleted her!
      With respect to any female on here that might be a member of a dating site the few I did meet were all neurotic nutbags!
      If I ever decide it’s worth being soclal with the opposite sex again I’ll try the old fashion way!
      Also with respect to our friends in the gay comunity I have two other work mates of that ilk that never seem to stop dating new people (both off the net and the aforementioned old fashion way). Makes me wonder sometimes if I should “jump the fence”?

    • acotrel says:

      07:23am | 13/10/11

      If you get drunk, you might get non-consensual sex?  Gavin King the LNP candidate seems to believe that’s OK !

    • Al.B says:

      08:52am | 13/10/11

      hey S.L. there’s no rule that u can’t jump back and forth ... or at least peer thru the cracks in the fence now and then… just sayin! raspberry

    • RyaN says:

      11:41am | 13/10/11

      @acotrel: Yes because that SA ALP MP just prefers kiddie porn!
      You really shouldn’t play that game acotrel, especially considering the bunch of lowlifes that inhabit the ALP.
      Craig Thompson?

    • neo says:

      12:44pm | 13/10/11

      Truth is, and this is particularly true for Australia, a girl can pick and choose more, the good ones don’t need to bother dating online, they get propositioned enough in real life, so chances are, if its a pretty picture in the profile, the profile is fake.

    • Wendy says:

      02:45pm | 15/10/11

      I resemble that remark Neo. I mean resent. I’m a hottie but I find the men at clubs to be absolute losers (stay at home smoking pot instead of working and still live with parents at age 42).  Yes I get a lot of attention and propositions at clubs but by losers. There are lot of beautiful kind and lovable women on dating websites who are real and beautiful (both inside and out). We are just trying to find the nice guys.

      You need to use your common sense to weed out the fakes. Here’s just one example, use MSN to hear her voice if she wont give you her number (her accent should give a lot away whether she’s in Australia or the Philipinnes seeking a sugar daddy)

    • Mahhrat says:

      05:39am | 13/10/11

      Claire, let me get this straight.  You’re a happily engaged woman who masqueraded as a man?  Why?

      If you did do that, I can tell you that the reason you weren’t “propositioned” by the girls is because by and large, girls don’t do that.

      I’m sure SSR will school you well on this concept.  He has a PHD in ascerbic wisdom, and can write better than I.

      One of the things I love about my lady is that she did come after me, and I greatly respected the fact that she saw what she wanted and had the courage to “go for it” with class and subtlety.  She won my heart not just because she’s awesome, but that she was prepared to accept some of the risk of rejection that, in general, blokes are expected to carry.

      She didn’t feel some stupid sense of entitlement to have me chase after her - though given her quality, I’d have happily done so.  She met me half way in most things, and still does today.  She agrees with me - your best behaviour should be reserved for the ones you love, not the strangers in the world who’s opinion matters squat.  So often, we get that the wrong way around.

    • Nic says:

      07:58am | 13/10/11

      She pretended to be a man on Grindr, there’s no implication she pretended to be a man on Blendr.

      Although if she did then again, it does kind’a ruin the whole point

    • Mahhrat says:

      08:33am | 13/10/11

      @Nic, I got confused by the whole thing.  But then, I don’t get lying at all as a general rule of thumb.

    • marley says:

      08:55am | 13/10/11

      Aww, I think you guys are being too tough on her.  It all boils down to, she likes the no frills, no nonsense approach of the gay sex crowd on Grindr, and is less enamoured of the circuitous approach of the hettero crowd (of either sex) on Blendr.  The first is more honest than the second, because everyone is really after the same thing, and getting to know you isn’t part of it.

      Personally, I thought her point was kind of interesting.  Not that I’m a likely candidate for either site, by the way.

    • Mahhrat says:

      09:30am | 13/10/11

      @marley, I just thought it was hilarious that she talks about the inherent dishonesties of the hetero dating game, when she’s engaging in dishonesty herself to make the story “work”.

      What would have been far more interesting is if she’d created her profile with her fiance’s knowledge, and then wrote about what blokes approached her knowing she was already engaged.  I mean, threesomes?  Maybe fiance wants to watch?  Maybe lots of guys, on learning she’s researching an article, could give some good comments?

      Then you could get Ant Sharwood or Penbo on and do the same but in reverse.  THAT would be awesome.

    • iansand says:

      09:46am | 13/10/11

      It is possible that every user of Blendr is a journalist who has joined with a fake profile in order to write a story.  Which would be a pretty funny story if it was true.

      Leaving that possibility aside, and assuming that this is not an advertorial, how else would the wtier get a story which some people may find interesting?  It is a legitimate, tried and true tactic of the reptiles of the press.

    • Lostie says:

      05:40am | 13/10/11

      This reminds me of an experiment that some friends and I did at uni. 4 of friends (2 guys and two girls) asked a random sample of people if thy would be interested in hooking up for sex. The 4 were all of ‘similar attractiveness’ - with one exception and she was, by her own admission “Going to end up being a cat lady, because cats don’t care what you look like”.

      The responses that the 2 guys got ranged from offended to outright aggressive - only one or 2 were interested. The girls, overwhelmingly, received positive responses (the less attractive one did get more rejections, but still far less than either of the guys).

      We then did a similar thing asking about dating - suddenly the reactions between the gender were pretty much equal.

      We then went a step further with the later group - after explaining that this was just a study, and confirming that we weren’t keeping names - we asked if they were “likely/unlikely or “50/50” about having sex on a first date. In both genders, unlikely rated less than 25%.

      So the conclusion - when males lie about what they want they have a far better chance of getting it. So long as that is a reality in the physical world it will remain the case in the world of social media - men will lie to increase their chances of getting what they want. Further, there is no incentive to being honest, it actually significantly reduces one’s chances.

    • Budz says:

      09:44am | 13/10/11

      No surprises there that men are better off lying about their intentions etc. Is that where the saying nice guys finish last comes from?

    • neo says:

      12:51pm | 13/10/11

      Nice guys finish last indeed, this is particularly true if you’re trying to hook up with a younger girl, say early 20s.

      Guys are pretty much aware now that you have to be a bit of a dick in order to get anywhere with girls, well, perhaps not a dick, but you HAVE to be cocky and funny at the least, if you act like a mop of a nice guy, you lose.

      To be fair, girls who act a lil “bad” are also better positioned, but even a truly nice and good girl will have no trouble attracting males, something that cannot be said for the latter.

    • NS says:

      01:40pm | 13/10/11

      Budz and neo,

      That’s funny, I thought that’s what women wanted - The guy to finish last.

    • Paul Murray says:

      02:01pm | 13/10/11

      “Cocky and funny”. A keyword.

      When you get a few years along, and PUA loses its charm, google MGTOW.

    • neo says:

      02:53pm | 13/10/11

      I was never in agreement with running around with magic cards in your pockets, although those PUAs had some right ideas!

      I always preferred to just be myself, which happens to be cocky and funny, and show a genuine interest in the other person smile

      MGTOW movement is pretty interesting, although I prefer to suck it up and support myself, with the occasional cheerful words from my mates.

    • I know! says:

      03:03pm | 13/10/11

      Trust me, Budz, as the daughter of a male sociopath: men are terrible, TERRIBLE liars, unless they’re insane grin

    • gobsmack says:

      06:56am | 13/10/11

      Men, be they straight or gay, are uncomplicated beasts when it comes to sex which is why it is so easy for gay men to hook up for sex.  There are no women involved so the quest for sex is a relatively straightforward process.  I pity men who are exclusively heterosexual.

    • Plissken says:

      07:32am | 13/10/11

      Never thought about it that way, but it makes sense…

    • acotrel says:

      07:33am | 13/10/11

      @gobsmack

      ‘I pity men who are exclusively heterosexual. ‘

      I’m happy !

    • TChong says:

      08:01am | 13/10/11

      Gobsmack
      I am very accepting of just about anything, but have to agree with acotrel,
      I am also a 180, who also is very happy to be exclusively het, and dont feel that I’m missing out on anything.
      Each to their own.

    • gobsmack says:

      08:35am | 13/10/11

      Perhaps I should qualify that last comment.
      One of my best friends is a straight guy who was divorced about 5 years ago.  He’s a lovely person - intelligent and with a wicked sense of humor - however, he’s no Brad Pitt.  Since his separation he’s found it hard to match up with women.  I guess he finds the dating game difficult.  He is both lonely and sexually frustrated.
      I’ve been in a stable relationship for the last 6 years.  Before then I was often lonely but I always had easy outlets (that’s probably not the right word) for sex.
      My pity if for those heterosexual men who are unattached and find the whole “love game” confronting and difficult.
      If you are in a loving stable relationship, regardless of your sexual orientation, then you are indeed a fortunate person.

    • Fred says:

      08:35am | 13/10/11

      I pity me too. It’s really, really hard. That’s what she said.

      I’ll go one further and say women have it piss easy when it comes to sex too. They just have to look good and say “yes”.

      No wonder there’s been so much violence and corruption in the world.

    • Roland says:

      09:05am | 13/10/11

      yeah it sucks bad gobsmack. the only time i’ve not been sexually frustrated is in those first six or so months of a relationship they call the ‘honeymoon’ phase. i get labeled as a ‘serial monogomist’ for my pursuit of those happy times

    • baal says:

      07:23am | 13/10/11

      @Gobsmack I am with you there. I love and respect women as friends family and workmates. As sexual partners my experiences have ranged from being stalked to being emotionally raped and left naked in the woods
      My experiences with men have ranged from polite rejection so polite it does not feel llike rejection or sex and maybe some good conversation.
      I like being bisexual. Was difficult admitting it at first but it has its benifits. I get straight priviledge when I want it and free sex when I need it. Yaaaaay!

    • fairsfair says:

      08:22am | 13/10/11

      baal, can I ask you a question on your bisexuality? I find it quite interesting…. and I don’t mean to cause offence if I do.

      As a bisexual do you treat homosexual sex as simply “fun” with a view to always form longterm relationships with someone of the opposite sex (be it for the fact is would be “socially easier” etc)? Or are you open to developing a longterm homosexual relationship? Is it a matter of “just the right person” coming along of either sex?

    • jeremy says:

      10:44am | 13/10/11

      @ fairs fair
      I personally would never date a guy, but in a pinch (or on holidays?) I do take the term ‘meaningless sex’ seriously.

    • fairsfair says:

      11:52am | 13/10/11

      Thanks for the feedback baal and Jeremy. I find it rather interesting purely because I don’t know any openly bisexual people. I find it harder to fathom than homosexuality, but that is purely becuase I (as everyone does) base my perceptions of the world on my own preferences (whcih in my case happen to be strictly hetero).

      Interesting that baal is open to either and Jeremy is open to only a relationship with a member of the opposite sex (assuming you are not a gal called Jeremy wink). Just goes to show - that you can’t pigeonhole anyone, even when they are able to “label” their sexuality. Everyone is different - and thank god for that!

    • J says:

      02:26pm | 13/10/11

      I’ve only ever had long term relationships with men but occasionally I also enjoy casual sex with women. I wouldn’t rule out having a relationship with a women completly but I don’t see it ever happen as I tend to view sex with women as a bit of naughty fun that I keep seperate from the rest of my life. I’m not ashamed of it, I just don’t think it’s anyone’s business who I’m sleeping with and I therefore don’t advertise my sexual encounters regardless of whether they’re with men or women.

    • Tubesteak says:

      07:39am | 13/10/11

      I’ll know I’ve died and gone to heaven when “Hey you, let’s fuck. Here. Now” is the only pick-up line ever needed and has a near 100% success rate on any woman.

      Gays have it so much easier. Unfortunately, women don’t do it that way despite my efforts of invoking ancient wizard spells or calling myself Brad Pitt.

      There are a number of studies into this sort of thing. First one was in 1989. It always shows that men are more interested in casual sex than women (unless the woman is Roseanne Barr or the man is Johnny Depp).

    • centurion48 says:

      08:17am | 13/10/11

      I don’t understand why you set up a Grindr account as a man and a Blendr account as a woman. WTF does that prove?
      I also hope the bloke whose photo you used on Grindr doesn’t mind being identified as a gay trawler on Google face recognition.
      Are you sure you are not Catherine Deveny?

    • Perth says:

      06:29pm | 13/10/11

      It makes sense, because then she will be propositioned by men in both situations, and can see the different ways straight and gay men approach their ‘target’ for sex. If she’d set up a male account on Blendr, she would have been getting propositions from females - so comparisons would be different.

    • Warwick says:

      08:20am | 13/10/11

      Of course women are more cautious about sex. They can get pregnant, they be branded as sluts, they can be beaten up. And sexually transmitted diseases can cause terrible, long-term damage to their reproductive organs.

      Huge numbers of men have contempt for women who go into sex with a man for whom they feel no strong affection. And by the way, have you never heard that both men and women find it a real sexual turn on that the person in bed with you actually likes you?

      You are attempting to eliminate affection, respect, admiration and all the higher human values from sexual encounters. If homosexuals can generally do this more easily than heterosexuals then that’s score one for heteros.

    • Amelia says:

      09:18am | 13/10/11

      I think when we’re talking about homosexuals having it easier as far as casual sex we’re talking about gay men, not lesbians.  Obviously there are plenty of lesbians who love casual sex and plenty of gay men who prefer something more committed,  but I think in general the hook up culture is more gay male than lesbian, probably because women in general prefer more emotional intimacy with their sex.

      I agree that hooking up for casual sex has very different consequences for women and men. Sadly some women seem to be so keen to prove that they they’re equal to men in the sexual realm that they put their health at risk in the process. Social and political equality is one thing. Biology is another thing altogether.

    • Matthew says:

      01:19pm | 13/10/11

      “Of course women are more cautious about sex. They can get pregnant, they be branded as sluts, they can be beaten up. And sexually transmitted diseases can cause terrible, long-term damage to their reproductive organs.”

      You don’t think men can be affected by this?  I’m pretty sure AIDs has the same affect on men as women, along with a bunch of other STIs.

      “Huge numbers of men have contempt for women who go into sex with a man for whom they feel no strong affection.”

      I’d be interested to see the research on this.  I expect that there are also plenty of women with contempt for men that do it as well as many men that don’t care.

    • Anna C says:

      08:28am | 13/10/11

      This is the app equivalent of a gay beat and that’s why I don’t necessarily think it will prove as popular with hetero people. Different strokes for different folks.

    • Dan says:

      08:37am | 13/10/11

      I wonder how many of the gay men on the casual sex site have aids. They are not so “upfront & honest” about that subject.
      There is an outbreak of it in young gay Australian men at the moment.
      Remember the Rip & Roll campaign ?! - Gay people should listen to it.

    • Lloyd says:

      09:00pm | 13/10/11

      I’m sure we would if people like Wendy Francis from the Christian Lobby would stop trying to rip it down…

    • AdamC says:

      08:39am | 13/10/11

      Straight women do not need a smartphone application to obtain casual sex.

      This article is silly. The author should not have had to impersonate anyone on anything to know that gay men and straight women (and, to an extent, straight men) have radically different attitudes to sex. I don’t know what proportion of gay men frequently hook up for casual sex, but it is a lot, despite the current fashion in the gay community to play happy families.

      The point of Grindr is it means promiscuous gay men don’t even need to go to a bar or a beat to trawl for sex. They can do it any old where! Blendr has no such core value proposition for its users.

    • marley says:

      09:01am | 13/10/11

      @AdamC - re your last paragraph:  I thought that was her entire point.  That Blendr, sadly, isn’t the hetero equivalent of Grindr:  it’s not a hook-up site, it’s another dating site in which people feel obliged to go through a pretense of getting to know one another.  There are plenty of heteros who just want to hook up and really do want a Grindr equivalent - or so I’m told smile

    • AdamC says:

      09:33am | 13/10/11

      Yeah, Marley, but aren’t all those heteros men? Isn’t that the underlying problem here?

    • marley says:

      10:32am | 13/10/11

      @AdamC - I don’t think so - I suspect women, especially young ones, might want to hook up just as much as guys but they’re more reluctant to come out and say so.  After all, if men sleep around, they’re “studs” and if women do, they’re “sluts.”  Everyone wants to be the former; not many want to be the latter.

    • Lostie says:

      10:58am | 13/10/11

      I don’t know about “everyone” and “not many”. While I don’t deny the stereotype, if one is sexually promiscuous, why would they be reluctant to be identified as such? That’s like someone being a geek for their geeky behaviour, a jock for their sporty behaviour and so on. Call a spade a spade and get over it. If you are promiscuous you are a slut. By definition. What’s the problem?

      Meanwhile, if our intrepid reporter were interested in a balanced article, why not create an account of both genders and approach other users and note the reactions. She may quickly find the reason that guys lie about their motives.

    • Miles says:

      12:30pm | 13/10/11

      Marley - That ‘stud’ vs ‘slut’ argument is so old….it’s not true anymore.  I guarantee you both males and females are identified as ‘sluts’ these days.  The thing is, being a slut isn’t necessarily looked down upon (for both sexes).  I can’t even think of the last time someone even used the term ‘stud’ to describe a guy….

    • marley says:

      03:30pm | 13/10/11

      @Miles - you can’t think of the last time you heard a guy referred to as a stud?  I gather you don’t often lunch with the girls.

    • Wendy says:

      03:38pm | 15/10/11

      @Marley Miles is right.Perhaps Marley you’re having lunch with the old girls talking about the “stud”. Us younger girls have had enough and want to be treated equally particularly on this subject. A male slut is a term we use often (and we usually stay clear of him). It’s only fair promiscious men cop the term we have been served for years (even for those of us who are not sluts!)

    • Peter says:

      08:43am | 13/10/11

      All you people need to lighten up.  The Author of this report created 2 fake profiles so that she could get a feel for what the applications were about & then write this story. Grinder as a Male as the app is for Gay Males & Woman on Blendr as this is for Straights. As a Gay Male & having tried Grindr(successfully i might add lol) I have to say that Im no offended by the report and absolutely appreciate where she is coming from.  Its just a light hearted look at the New World of meeting & hooking up with people.  You all should try it and you might just be pleasantly surprised.

    • JR says:

      08:48am | 13/10/11

      This was such a poorly constructed ‘study’ I had to suppress the urge to laugh.

    • baal says:

      09:00am | 13/10/11

      @fairsfairs.
      Looking for the right person. I am a difficult bastard too live with so it could take a while.
      Glad you asked. There are alot of myths about bisexuals most of which are unpleasant.

    • Siobhan says:

      10:06am | 13/10/11

      Sex means sexual intercourse.
      A man playing silly buggers with a man is not sex, neither is a girl diddling with a girl.
      Get a reference point people.

    • HappyCynic says:

      10:49am | 13/10/11

      And trolls live under bridges and don’t get any tongue laugh

      Why don’t you try it before you knock it?  You might be pleasantly surprised how enjoyable sex with the same sex can be.  Sure beats your left hand by a country mile.

    • Siobhan says:

      11:00am | 13/10/11

      and why don’t you eat shit?
      Don’t knock it if you haven’t tried it - right?

    • Warwick says:

      11:34am | 13/10/11

      Lets not descend into nasty gay bashing. Gay sex is not my thing, but hell, I’ve known hundreds of intelligent and sensitive and caring and courageous gay men. And if they see something in it, and if they say that it can be a deep communion (as well as a shallow communion, like lots of straight sex) then I’m prepared to believe it.

    • Dan the Breeder says:

      11:44am | 13/10/11

      Siobhan is right but foolish for trying to tell a gay person they are wrong - they are the victims remember !!
      (look at the responses !!!)

    • Zaf says:

      12:13pm | 13/10/11

      What insight!!!

      I’d like to add that just because you have air going in and out of your lungs it doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re breathing.

      So deep!

    • HappyCynic says:

      12:14pm | 13/10/11

      @Siobhan

      Scatophilia really isn’t my kinda thing, but hey if that’s what you’re into I won’t judge smile

    • Lostie says:

      12:45pm | 13/10/11

      Is this the Bill Clinton “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” defence?

    • Coolridge says:

      01:29pm | 13/10/11

      Get a dictionary tard… Sex isn’t specific to heterosexuals, including intercourse.

      Dan the Breeder the only thing gay people are victims of is heterosexuals ignorance and bigotry - case in point, you..

    • Dan the Breeder says:

      03:14pm | 13/10/11

      @ Coolridge - It’s all the heterosexuals fault…boohoo. Get over yourself, Bigot. (look it up in the dictionary tard, it applies to you)
      All the Gay hate for Heterosexuals is evident in the responses, as I said they will not accept any view bar their own. Bigots.

    • Coolridge says:

      03:36pm | 13/10/11

      I didn’t say it was the heterosexuals fault Dan, I said if we’re victims it’s of people’s ignorance - like yourself.  According to you we’re not allowed to defend ourselves from people such as yourself or the idiot Siobhan, and if we do we’re the bigots?  I think you’re a bit confused Dan..

      Hopefully the ‘breeder’ part of your name isn’t really true and you haven’t spawned your evil into the world yet… Who are you trying to convince anyway?  Why put the breeder part?  Scared someone’ll think you’re gay if you don’t? Or just trying to convince yourself..

    • simon. says:

      03:41pm | 13/10/11

      @ Dan the Breeder

      Victim? Not me mate. I ‘m not the one who expects the goverment to pay me money for having sex - unlike breeders who ‘find themselves’ pregnant and then expect payments because they can’t afford the kids.

    • Dan the breeder says:

      04:26pm | 13/10/11

      Breeding is important
      No breeding - no more humans, it’s pretty simple.
      Lucky for the Gays that their parents were breeders.

      Thank history for the breeders.

      Coolridge - yes it’s an endless circle.

    • Paul says:

      11:49am | 13/10/11

      Siobhan, what a charming, pleasant person you are.

    • Siobhan says:

      06:19pm | 13/10/11

      I know Paul
      Telling like it is, not how you want it to be is living in the real world. Not sure about the charming and pleasant bit. I was just stating the obvious.

      First you want to redefine marriage and then you want to redefine sex.

      Just keep living in your fantasy world.

    • Paul says:

      07:48pm | 13/10/11

      Siobhan, you attribute motives and desires to me that I simply do not have!  I just wanted to say, that from your comments, you seem to be a really appealing, genuinely caring and lovely person.

    • Zaf says:

      11:58am | 13/10/11

      For completeness, the author should have created an account on a similar app for lesbians.

      What’s that?  There isn’t one for lesbians?

      Gosh - perhaps that tells us something about why grindr works and blendr doesn’t?

      Men and women are equal, but we don’t HAVE to like or want exactly the same things. And in fact we do not.

    • Tim says:

      07:31am | 14/10/11

      There actually is - it’s called Pink Sofa. Quite a prolific pick up site & app if the reports of my dyke mates are anything to go by.

    • Rabid_Womble says:

      12:48pm | 14/10/11

      Actually, pink sofa is an excellent comparison. It is nothing like Grinder and it highlights its community aspects and so rather than an app for casual sex.

      Check out the advertising of both apps.

    • john says:

      12:19pm | 13/10/11

      After having Grindr for 2 years…I can say this;
      What everyone fails to see what blendr will do is what grindr & any other IT gadget,app, or internet social site has done. Alienate us all further. Blendr just takes it to the next level with approximate GPS within 60mtrs.

      These apps are extremely efficient. The GPS allows you to target something specific you might like. In the private chat area you can exchange real time photos in secs with your iphone. You can filter & block those that you do not like instantly, & its hard to mask who you are in private chat area, because photo exchanges are demanded in realtime before meeting.

      You never need to go to any club, or social function to meet people.

      Its the very reason why gay clubs, and gay suburbs have mostly shut down across Australia, its all gone ‘underground online’ with GPS.you don’t see that many gay men any more because they now live in a “bubble”.

      Blendr is the beginning of the end for night clubs and other social functions for people to meet.  Facebook will end up just becoming a photo album archive of past people you knew. Twitter is just for extroverts with nothing better to do and broadcast to empty “space”.

      Welcome to GPS social networking. 2 years behind the times str8 people!!

    • Ben says:

      09:00am | 14/10/11

      “you don’t see that many gay men any more because they now live in a “bubble”.”

      HAHAHAHAHA! Brilliant.

    • Miles says:

      12:26pm | 13/10/11

      So basically you have just tarnished and smeared the image of this ‘handsome but plain man’  who’s photo you used to trawl a gay casual sex site?  Hope for your sake he doesn’t find out…..

    • John says:

      01:13pm | 13/10/11

      THE OUTRAGE! Oh, the outrage!

    • Justin says:

      12:59pm | 13/10/11

      It’s pretty obvious what the differences are.

      Grindr is full of dudes. Dudes want to screw. All dudes are the same. So it’s very easy for a guy to approach another guy when both of them are like dogs on heat.

      Introduce females and things are more complicated. Girls are *generally* stimulated emotionally and making that initial connection with intentions to lay her is much more difficult. There are of course exceptions to the rule - E.g. With fire breathing sluts.

    • simon. says:

      01:30pm | 13/10/11

      This whole article trips up on one false premise - that Grindr is inherently successful because gay men are more honest about what they want. This is a long way from the truth - there are plenty of fakes (News Ltd journos?), liars and people just looking for something hot to talk about before they take matters in to their own hands. The strike rate is actually pretty low.

    • Utopia Boy says:

      02:09pm | 13/10/11

      What a very uninteresting article.
      There doesn’t seem to be a point except it’s easy to create a fake profile on a dating site.
      Big Deal. Most dating sites have a search function to find people in your area and whether you’d like to meet today, tomorrow or next year. You can also access most of them from your smartphone, and don’t have to communicate with unknowns.
      Thank you Claire for submitting your Year 9 written piece in social studies.
      C-

    • random says:

      02:09pm | 13/10/11

      Im a straight guy and have been on Blendr for a week. I have talked to lots of girls, hade some fantastic chats, been on 2 dates, had phone sex with one and actual sex with another. I have also lined up a date for tonight, next Tuesday and next Wednesday.

      I personally have never had any real issues with meeting girls face to face, but have had absolutely no luck with dating websites.

      I have been looking forward to this app coming out for a while and think it is a great idea!

    • Stuff of nightmares says:

      02:51pm | 13/10/11

      Nice positioning of words, there. I must say I find it more than just a bit disturbing to read the words “come around at eight, take your shirt off, don’t talk and then leave” right next to a picture of Julia GIllard kissing Kevin Rudd. Thanks for that shockingly disturbing mental image!

    • Matthew says:

      04:05pm | 13/10/11

      Yes, it’d be more appropriate if it was her and Craig Emerson since they did….*barf* I’m going to stop right there.  I know how much of a creep he is in real life so that’s far worse than Kevin Rudd and it actually happened.

    • neo says:

      02:57pm | 13/10/11

      Gay people seem to be more open and casual about sex. I can’t voice a guess on why that is because The Punch censors comments that the mods personally do not agree with, but facts are facts.

    • Toni says:

      01:08pm | 14/10/11

      funnily enough lesbian couples have less sex than anyone and gay couples have the most sex with hetero couples coming in the middle (no pun intended). So you can see that women don’t really want sex tehy want a partner who they can show off - it’s all about their image with other women

    • Leah says:

      02:57pm | 13/10/11

      All this suggests is that gay people are more promiscuous than straight people. I hate to make that generalisation because I don’t really think it’s true, but that’s all your little experiment suggests.

    • Justin says:

      03:45pm | 13/10/11

      Don’t hate generalising if it’s true. Guys think with their dicks. This applies to gay guys.

    • Platocrates says:

      08:18am | 14/10/11

      Leah, you must surely be severely knowledge-deprived if you don’t know that homosexual males are vastly more “anyone-will-do-even-if-they-have-HIV” promiscuous than normal (sic) people (when something constitutes 99% of the whole, that something is ‘normal,’  so don’t come the p.c.b.s. Rational people don’t buy it),  In fact, rampant promiscuity is exactly the heart of the problem with homosexuality. They need to be in everybody’s faces with their sexulaity. Probably because they believe it pays to advertise, irrespective of whether the adverts are offensive to (yes) normal people.

    • Scott Rose says:

      03:15pm | 13/10/11

      You’re pretty stupid, Claire if you envy the position held by gay men in society. Now let’s see if your mods have the gonads to publish a comment that says so.

    • Jimbo says:

      03:31pm | 13/10/11

      Is facebook dead already?

    • john says:

      04:03pm | 13/10/11

      Pretty much… where have you been?.....its all about apps. websites are for oldies over 30. Visiting websites are like visiting relatives, you only go if you have to.

    • Matthew says:

      04:06pm | 13/10/11

      Like this website, John?  And it’s oldies over 21.

    • Flaming says:

      04:29pm | 13/10/11

      Wow. I’m Gay and super offended by the reference to Grindr as a “casual Sex tool”. Yes, there are some who use it as a hookup machine- i can’t deny that. But, I’m sure there are people who use Adult match maker, Blendr etc for the same purpose. Likewise, there are “Gays” who use Grindr for networking purposes.

      You’re right in that gay people are typically more liberated when discussing sex.

    • Urbanite says:

      10:19pm | 13/10/11

      Nah I think women who join Blendr want the whole caboodle, no strings sex, but while generally men are purely visual creatures and can jump straight into the sack with any girl who looks human, half decent and doesn’t smell (even that might be optional), women tend to want a fantasy or storyline to go behind it.
      Look at all the garbage romance books that are chock full of eye watering descriptions of rippling muscle men with deep eyes who ravage the woman till the sun sets and rises 3 times over.
      They don’t want to risk it on a bloke whom they can’t ‘fit’ into their fantasy (visually and other factors) as well, so many of them test waters with ‘What do you like’ and crap like that, as well as arrange dates to decide if they wanna screw the guy.
      Guys are purely visual. Gals want the backdrop and storyline before they can do the deed, makes it more exciting and satisfying.

    • Not impressed says:

      09:54am | 14/10/11

      Uploaded someone else’s photograph?  Its bad enough you created a fake profile but to use some poor sod’s photo without permission? Isn’t there laws against that?

    • Plato says:

      11:22am | 14/10/11

      The Western World has quietly become a civilization that undervalues men and overvalues women, where the state forcibly transfers resources from men to women creating various perverse incentives for otherwise good women to conduct great evil against men and children, and where male nature is vilified but female nature is celebrated.  This is unfair to both genders, and is a recipe for a rapid civilizational decline and displacement, the costs of which will ultimately be borne by a subsequent generation of innocent women, rather than men, as soon as 2020.

    • John says:

      11:52am | 14/10/11

      It’s called Marxtization..empower the feeble minded so that the International Marxist party has less resistance from gaining power. It’s why they prompt multiculturalism and immigration in the west in order to weaken the native whites tribes and cause division.  They prompt division between man and woman via feminism, and then promote religious division via prompting atheism to counter christian groupings. Then there is further division with the introduction of sexual styles, homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexuality, divide, divide, divide and conqueror. Prompt sports and keep the minds of humans unconscious.

    • Plato says:

      11:49am | 14/10/11

      The Four Sirens : Four unrelated forces simultaneously combined to entirely distort the balance of civilization built on the biological realities of men and women.  Others have presented versions of the Four Sirens concept in the past, but I am choosing a slightly different definition of the Four Sirens :

      1) Easy contraception (condoms, pills, and abortions): In the past, extremely few women ever had more than one or two sexual partners in their lives, as being an unwed mother led to poverty and social ostracization.  Contraception made it possible for females to conduct campaigns to act on their urges of hypergamy.
      2) ‘No fault’ divorce, asset division, and alimony : In the past, a woman who wanted to leave her husband needed to prove misconduct on his part.  Now, the law has changed to such a degree that a woman can leave her husband for no stated reason, yet is still entitled to payments from him for years to come.  This incentivizes destruction because it enables women to transfer the costs of irresponsible behavior onto men and children.
      3) Female economic freedom : Despite ‘feminists’ claiming that this is the fruit of their hard work, inventions like the vacuum cleaner, washing machine, and oven were the primary drivers behind liberating women from household chores and freeing them up to enter the workforce.  These inventions compressed the chores that took a full day into just an hour or less.  There was never any male opposition to women entering the workforce, as more labor lowered labor costs while also creating new consumers.  However, one of the main reasons that women married - financial support - was no longer a necessity.
      Female entry into the workforce is generally a positive development for society, and I would be the first to praise this, if it were solely on the basis of merit (as old-school feminists had genuinely intended).  Unfortunately, too much of this is now due to corrupt political lobbying to forcibly transfer resources from men to women.
      4) Female-Centric social engineering : Above and beyond the pro-woman divorce laws, further state interventions include the subsidization of single motherhood, laws that criminalize violence against women (but offer no protection to men who are the victims of violence by women, which happens just as often), and ‘sexual harassment’ laws with definitions so nebulous that women have the power to accuse men of anything without the man having any rights of his own.

    • Plato says:

      03:43pm | 14/10/11

      Patriarchy works because it induces men and women to cooperate under their complementary strengths.  ‘Feminism’ does not work, because it encourages immoral behavior in women, which eventually wears down even the durable chivalry of beta men, making both genders worse off.  It is no secret that single motherhood is heavily subsidized, but it is less understood that single spinsterhood is also heavily subsidized through a variety of unsustainable and unreciprocated means.  The default natural solution is for the misandric society to be outcompeted and displaced.

    • Mena says:

      09:12am | 17/10/11

      Hey, that’s poewrful. Thanks for the news.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter