Has all this royal wedding talk made you think about Princess Diana? I know she was much-derided when she was alive – what with the nutty psychics, playing the paparazzi and preying on other women’s partners. But, come April 29, there’s going to be an empty seat at Westminster Abbey and, sappy as it sounds, I know that will make me sad.

A princess and a mother. Pic: AFP

Diana would have been 50 this year – a fabulous age to watch your first-born son marry the woman he loves. You can speculate all you like on how she might have stolen the show, but she was nothing if not an instinctive and affectionate mother.

What was fascinating about Diana was that both her life and death provoked a visceral response – not an intellectual one. Occasionally her actions made us think (her charity work for AIDS/landmines) but, more often, she made us feel. Struggling with the same problems as the rest of us – men, parenting, body image – she was like Julia Roberts’ character in Notting Hill: “I’m also just a girl standing in front of a boy, asking him to love her.”

I was 12 when Diana married her prince and I watched it on the telly with my mum. I loved the way she stuffed up Charles’ name, how the dress creased ridiculously and how she obviously adored her husband.

Later, working for a newspaper in London, I met her a few times and, like most, I was bedazzled. Her luminosity transcended modern celebrity, but her coquettishness could reduce hardened male hacks to giggling schoolgirls. Never mind the fancy palace, the title or the jewels, I’d always come away wishing I had her legs. They were solid-gold gorgeous.

Not much silences a newsroom, but the Sunday she died was eerily quiet as we typed words that felt inadequate, and deliberated over the single image that would form the front page and somehow capture her life. Later that week, I slipped out of the office to the palace where piles of flowers, with their garish bows and servo wrapping, illustrated far better than political spin-doctoring that she was indeed the People’s Princess.

At times like this, you wonder what she might have become. In my crystal ball, I see her living in America, not with Dodi Fayed, but someone improbable, perhaps a playwright à la Marilyn, or a gifted doctor such as her beloved Hasnat Khan.

She’d be godmother to Elton John’s bub and she’d have done away with that ghastly butler and replaced him with someone like Chris Colfer’s character in Glee. Of course, she’d have had Botox and she’d be a yoga nut, but there’s no way she’d do a Demi and upstage the younger generation by wearing a mini-dress to a fashion show.

Which brings us to Kate. I bet Diana would have adored her. Why? Because her son does. In these weeks before the wedding, it would be Diana, not Camilla, taking Kate to lunch and instructing her to eat. And keep it down.

As former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown points out in her definitive biography, The Diana Chronicles, “Diana grew up associating the camera with love” because taking photographs was the only way her father showed her affection.

Come the wedding, those lenses will be trained on her son and daughter-in-law. Not that Diana would have minded, because – even for a princess – there’s no pride greater than that which you feel for your child. 

Wanna chance to get to the royal wedding? Check out www.news.com.au/aussieenvoy for for the News Ltd competition

Most commented

36 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • TChong says:

      07:12am | 06/03/11

      Pahleese !
      Another just as factual, realistic and equally plausible fortune telling “crystal ball” sees her doing a Fergie, begging for money, making guest appearances on “Jersey Shore”, “Glee”, “Cougar Town” and becoming Oprahs new bestie.
      “She was like Julie Roberts CHARACTER…” - Thats the problem for royalty fans- the blurring of reality and fiction, and the seeming impossibility for those besotted by royalty to distinguish between the two.
      Since Di was human, with all the failings and faults as anyone else, why try to portray her as something else?
      It was sad when she got killed , sure. It sad when any one gets killed .

    • Off with Their Heads says:

      08:59am | 06/03/11

      I hope there are some Lady Di look alikes at the wedding to give the Prince of Wails and Cowmilla something to think about and remember the way they treated a young, gullible girl and mother.

    • Jenni says:

      10:15am | 06/03/11

      So, in order to “stick one up” Charles and Camilla, you would seek to destroy Will & Kate’s happiness on their big day with a tasteless and cruel prank? *WOW* Way to pick your moment, asshat.

      I’m not a royal, never have been, but I wish Kate & Wills the same joy as any other couple on their big day. Hope it all goes great smile

    • Happy Days says:

      03:13pm | 06/03/11

      Me too Jenni. Everyone who denies the glitz of the occassion is jealous.  They are sharing a very private affair with the rest of the world be thank.
      It is very sad Fergie wasn’t invited and Gillard was.  Ouch!

    • Andrew says:

      08:45am | 07/03/11

      Oh how sick making.  The late Princess of Wales (did you note the word “late” in there) died 14 or 15 years ago - life is for the living so let her RIP.  I really think its sick and obsesive for people to want people who attend the wedding to muck up the special day of these two young people just to pick on Chuck and Camilla.  Oh lord in heaven can’t these people get the hell over it and move on!!!  If its about Diana then for some reason people seem to think this kind of behaviour is ok.  If it were about anyone else they would be sent to the nearst shrink.

    • Goldenfaber says:

      09:28am | 06/03/11

      And on a good note i look forward to the wedding. But they will not travel in a horse driven carriage? Communists!

    • stephen says:

      09:52am | 06/03/11

      Self-pity is a form of manipulation, and when Di looked into those cameras begging us to look and love, it wasn’t because her husband didn’t, but because she’d by then known that she’d made a mistake in marriage and life. She knew she was doing something she shouldn’t have, (and what was that, you ask ?) and wanted us to be on her side ‘case it got nasty.
      She had feelings all right, and they were mostly for herself.
      The good acts she did were insurance, and it seems the only time she had fun was when we weren’t looking : behind someone else’s closed doors.

    • Glad Di had a Chance for fun says:

      02:09pm | 06/03/11

      What a load of rubbish Stephen.  I’m glad she had fun behind closed doors, as it is none of anyone’s business.
      Perhaps you my be married and have a longtime mistress on the side.
      I will enjoy watching the wedding

    • Ben says:

      08:50am | 07/03/11

      Really well put… Self-pity is indeed “a form of manipulation, and when Di looked into those cameras begging us to look and love, it wasn’t because her husband didn’t, but because she’d by then known that she’d made a mistake in marriage and life.”  Yes, she did make a mistake in agreeing to marry him knowing that there was a mistress in the wings.  Its like moving close to an airport and then demaning it be moved because it’s too noisy.  The women was no saint and it really anoys me how people go on and on about how she’s the closest thing the Commonwealth had to Mother Theresa.

    • Zaf says:

      10:10am | 06/03/11

      @ TChong

      Yes, all true, but Diana was also the only ‘royal’ who showed any personality, and who actually went out on a limb by picking causes like AIDS charities when the rest of them were playing it safe by supporting the RSPCA.  That was edgy back then, and also actually a valuable thing to do.  Ditto her taking up the issue of land mines despite their being a lucrative British export - because that was the right thing to do.  If the British Monarchy lasts a few generations more, Diana is the reason.

    • Kiron Mani Tripp says:

      10:17am | 06/03/11

      It will be a dream come true to be at the wedding. I know that Lady Diana
      will be looking down with her blessing.

    • Leonie Jonsson says:

      11:35am | 06/03/11

      We would dearly love to attend the royal wedding as there will be such a
      a wonderful celebration in London to honour such a popular couple.

    • Chris says:

      10:35am | 06/03/11

      No need for too much wistful what-if speculation. It’s just the wedding of the future king and queen of England—significant, sure, but only to a point. Yes, sad for William that his mum won’t be there. It was sad for my wife that her dad couldn’t be there. Sometimes people just die.

    • Gregg says:

      11:10am | 06/03/11

      The pic you have used for the article is as good as a thousand words Angela and yes whilst many may have never had or lost some affinity with Royals, I do imagine Diana would be pleased for Kate and Willy and that they may be a far better match than a few others of the Royals.
      And certainly the legginess there.

      I wonder whether Willy and Kate have waited so long because they had some doubts themselves brought on by how Charles and Diana’s relationship developed.
      But they certainly have a much longer prenuptials history together, all the way from being Uni chums.

    • My Father Blessed Our Wedding day says:

      11:38am | 06/03/11

      I would do the same.  I lost my beloved Father through cancer.  The wonderful memory of his was with me on my special day, and he was mentioned in our wedding vows.  They were happy tears shed.  It wasn’t soppy.  It was respecting him and his wonderful contribution in raising me.  It also made my Mother very proud.

    • Nanna from Vyle Bay says:

      12:34pm | 06/03/11

      April 29 1970, Prince Phillip attended the Botany Bay Barbecue to celebrate Captain Cook coming across Australia.
      On April 29 2011, Prince Phillip will be attending the Buckingham Palace Barbecue to celebrate Prince Billy coming across with Princess Katie.

    • Nanna from Vyle Bay says:

      12:45pm | 06/03/11

      Australia should become a republic on April 29 2011

    • Chris says:

      04:37pm | 06/03/11

      Not much time to organise a referendum, Nanna.

    • Nathan says:

      08:54am | 07/03/11

      Oh get over it Nanna - if you think Prince William’s wedding is going to help republicans then you’re off with the pixies.

    • St. Michael says:

      01:34pm | 06/03/11

      That’s some hagiography for Princess Diana.  Right down to saying she was “luminous”.  Had she just dropped by from Chernobyl or something?

      Diana’s first interest in supporting causes was Diana.  She regularly took leaves out of the Benetton advertising book in that she’d put herself against backgrounds of ugliness or disease to make herself look a lot more impressive than she actually was; hence the AIDS babies and land mine victims.  Mother Teresa died around the same time she did and got a fraction of the applause despite devoting her entire existence to the same causes, except she’d been living in the poverty with her flock rather than swanning through for a photo opportunity.  Diana’s background was pure Sloane Ranger, not working class.

      And she had a definite agenda once she finally decided the British monarchy was not for her.  The following lines, attributed to Tony Blair in “The Queen” regarding Elizabeth II, sum up the position entirely:

      “That woman has given her whole life in service to her people. Fifty years doing a job she never wanted! A job she watched kill her father. She’s executed it with honor, dignity and, as far as I can tell, without a single blemish, and now we’re all baying for her blood! All because she’s struggling to lead the world in mourning for someone who… who threw everything she offered back in her face and who, for the last few years, seemed committed 24/7 to destroying everything she holds most dear!”

      That was Diana’s legacy.  Andrew Morton’s book about her, far from being the “expose unintended”, was vetted by her in its final drafts—she comprehensively invaded her own privacy as well as that of her husband, and all to revel in the role of Queen of Hearts.

      This isn’t to excuse Charles, I might say, or more particularly the very silly religious protocols that resulted in his uncle (Edward VIII) getting kicked off the throne and guaranteeing he couldn’t actually marry the woman he (shudder) actually wanted to.  But this piece of hagiography at least peters off to weakly say “Anyway, she was a good mum, and that makes her worthy of rememberance.”

      Bullcrap.  All mothers are remembered, generally on Mother’s Day.  Diana made the British monarchy popular again, but then tried to destroy it when she decided not to play by its rules anymore.  Nothing wonderful about that.  And I strongly suspect that William selected his bride very, very carefully for precisely those reasons: because the British monarchy can’t withstand another Diana, and Kate Middleton has all the makings of being one.

    • stephen says:

      06:46pm | 06/03/11

      Yes. And Kate looks lovely.
      But it doesn’t matter if it doesn’t work out you know.
      Because the best behaviour matters, and I gotta tell you, the British have already paid their dues.
      (10 times over.)

    • Pudel says:

      08:37pm | 06/03/11

      I remember Dianas death, and then Mother Theresa.  I have always strongly believed Mother Theresa died then so there would be less hype about her death.  She would have wanted to die quietly and peacefully.

    • mary says:

      02:23pm | 06/03/11

      RIP Diana, a great mum. And no doubt doing the very best she could under near impossible difficult circumstances as a member of the royal family and wife.

      I wish the royal family some manners. But given that William didn’t feel that his auntie (his mum’s former best friend and the mother of his cousins) was entitled to an invitation, I won’t hold my breath.

    • Carl Spackler says:

      06:44pm | 06/03/11

      Princess Diana may not be there but there will be plenty of other royal loonies there to make up for it.  It’s a shame Dodi and Mohamed Al-Fayed won’t be there either.  Now that would have made for some seating difficulties.

    • Sally Archer says:

      11:49am | 08/03/11

      I believe the sound of bells rings all the way to heaven and trully hope they have a wonderful wedding and life together.

    • robyn says:

      12:00pm | 08/03/11

      i saw the now queen married,i saw her have all her children,i saw diana married to charles and so now i will see william married to kate,i think diana would have been proud of her sons today.

    • Lynette Smede says:

      06:15pm | 08/03/11

      For Prince William i say just like the song I did it my way.For Kate
      I say it starts when you sink in his arms and end up with your arms in the sink

    • Alan Moore says:

      07:04pm | 08/03/11

      Being a first generation and elderly Australian of British heritage, I’ll again look forward to this wedding with the same pride and inspiration, and be moved as I am whenever hearing “Land of hope and glory” played really loud!

    • Angela Setter says:

      11:06pm | 08/03/11

      Yes i du wish all the best 2 Will,he just like his mom….i knw Diana wll be there biside him on that day…if i could be there on Will Wed….i be sing a song Ave Maria/wed song, special give frm me 2 Will and Kate.

    • John Eric Pearson says:

      04:06pm | 10/03/11

      We are so happy for William, Dianna’s beloved son being married to the girl he obviously loves.
      Being born in England and lived there for the first 15 years of my life, I and my wife would really love to go over again especially for this wonderful occasion.  What a thrill it would be.

    • audrey burgin says:

      06:40pm | 12/03/11

      This is truly the wedding of the centuatry to be at, what a wonderfull couple who express love and commitment in every way. I am a british national who believes in the monarchy and would love to see william and his bride become head on england as they make a perfect couple and give the world a great positive message on marriage love and family values.Althought I live in Australia I have family roots in England and my 17yo who is enjoying a years work in UK so I would love to share this momentus occasion with them. This weding is an event for all the world to enjoy in the happiness .

    • St. Michael says:

      12:39am | 14/03/11

      Shame you didn’t pick up the Queen’s English along with your love of the Queen.

    • Lorraine O'Sullivan says:

      07:41am | 20/03/11

      I would love to share this beautiful occassion with them.Diana will be there in spirit as she shines out to the world through William. Would be just awesone to see he and Kate wed.

    • Donald Malcolm Hopkins says:

      07:03pm | 02/04/11

      I was a young boy sent to Australia by ship “SS ORMOND”  from England and placed in a home called Fairfbridge Farm School in Western Australia 1948.  It would be a major part of my life to be able to be invited to this special wedding of our future KING AND QUEEN ,  We adore our Royal Family .  Thank you.

    • Mrs Margaret Anderson says:

      07:35pm | 02/04/11

      We would be extremely honoured and proud   to attend Prince William and Kate Middletons Wedding as we have always honoured and respected our   Royal Family since our childhood   by keeping in touch
      with our Royal Family.

    • EdwardVII says:

      02:19am | 01/05/11

      Diana left a world in heartbreak.  all the royal family pd bloggers, get what that means to the rest of the world.  They take her HRH status, that her a son someday will correct the wrong for His mother, yet allow Camilla Simpson Parker Bowls have it.  not even wills can make chuck and his rounder respected.  who knows what will be left of the monarchy when those two finish.  after all…Edward 7th had to abdicate for his divorced lover..mother of a future king stripped of her HRH only to allow Wallis er Camelia.  Disgusting.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

@lenphil29 Hi Lenny. How was your weekend?

Anthony Sharwood

RT @rdhinds: David Warner out for 2 in 5 balls. Now that's a real days work @malcolmconn and @crashcraddock1! #unrealopeners

Anthony Sharwood

Footy Show apologises for 20 years of irrelevant, boofheadish drivel... in our dreams. But the baby apol is a start http://t.co/oaDfGDMJBh

Malcolm Farr

@katedoak Love the 'gay click' reference. Sadly my comment wasn't good enough to be recorded.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter