So Ricky Ponting has quit as Australian cricket captain. About time. And Ricky Ponting will still be available for selection as a regular member of the team. As he should be.

Later, dude. Pic: Brett Costello.

Months and even years of speculation were laid to rest at the SCG today, when Ponting announced his seven year reign was over. “I’ve still got a lot to offer as player,” he told a hefty media contingent. “Younger players can learn from me and the way I play, and there’s no better place for them to learn than in the heat of the battle.”

Before the announcement, a few wise-cracking journalists were framing the odds of Ponting breaking into tears. Didn’t happen. Ponting only made his decision last night, and called Michael Clarke first thing this morning to tell him. But he kept his emotions in check, even if his crumpled notes suggested he’d rehearsed his lines long into the night to keep the waterworks at bay.

Unsurprisingly, Ponting said he’d now take the field with a lighter burden on his shoulders. He hopes that runs may flow a little more easily now, until the day he pulls the pin. Twenty million Australians could have told him that.

So what of the legacy of Australia’s 42nd Test captain, one Ricky Thomas Ponting?

“I’d like to think I’ve achieved a lot more than [three Ashes losses],” he was at pains to point out today.

Many of Australia’s less generous cricket fans have long suggested that Ponting couldn’t lead a pack of rats to jump a sinking ship. That’s not entirely fair.

Ponting did have numerous leadership successes, especially in the one day game. As mentioned on The Punch recently, his two World Cups, both of them as the spearhead of unbeaten campaigns, don’t look too bad on the CV.

Ponting today also proudly mentioned his 16 match Test winning streak as captain from 2005-2008, a feat which equalled Steve Waugh’s more celebrated streak from 1999 to 2001.

But for all his successes, he’ll never escape the stigma of his unprecedented three Ashes losses. Australia’s players are always saying that nothing is more important to them, or the public than The Ashes. So Ricky can hardly shy away from this massive, massive blot on his copybook.

To mangle that old Oscar Wilde quote about the death of one’s parents, if losing one Ashes series as skipper was bad luck, and two was carelessness, then three losses looked like sheer incompetence. No one doubts Ponting’s status as Australia’s best batsman since Bradman. But was he really that poor a skipper? Let’s delve a bit deeper.

After inheriting Steve Waugh’s One Day team in 2003, and promptly winning a World Cup with a squad weakened by the withdrawal of Shane Warne (for foolishly raiding his mum’s medicine cabinet), Ponting inherited Steve Waugh’s Test team in early 2004.

Off he marched to Sri Lanka, where something quite remarkable happened. For the first time in Test cricket history, a team won a three match series 3-0 after conceding a first innings deficit in each match.

That first Test, where Australia trailed by 161 runs in the first innings, reveals a telling tale. Australia won the match, after Matt Hayden top scored in the second dig, and Shane Warne took 10 wickets for the match. The lesson is obvious: when the big guns fired, so did Ponting’s Australia.

But as we all know, the legends started to retire as Ponting’s seven year tenure unfolded. And the departures of Warne, McGrath, Langer, Hayden, Gilchrist, Martyn, Gillespie, Lee and even Andrew Symonds proved too much to overcome. It’s hard to argue that even Mark Taylor, with all his famed tactical nous, would have won too many series with that lot vanishing overnight.

Clearly, Ponting was several tactical rungs below his predecessors Allan Border, Mark Taylor and Steve Waugh. There are countless examples of him freezing in “the heat of the battle” (his favourite phrase), never more shockingly than when he bowled Mike Hussey for four overs in a Test Australia had some chance of winning in India. His excuse was that he was trying to fix the slow over rate. Slow brain, more like it.

As pointed out in The Punch last year, Ponting wasn’t half the man motivator that Steve Waugh was either. But he did have one handy characteristic as captain. He was a scrapper.

Early in his career, he was literally that. To his credit, he never again got into trouble after his 1999 Kings Cross dustup, and recovered from alcoholism. Whatever you think of the man, he has tremendous fighting qualities, and admirable self control. He fought and fought and fought to get where he did, and carried a few likeminded souls with him along the way, like Andrew Symonds.

To the end, or as long as was reasonably possible, he defended his mates - even if, like Marcus North, they were totally useless, or like Andrew Symonds, patently a pisshead.

He had other qualities befitting a captain, not least of them an encyclopaedic knowledge of the game. Ponting has always pretended not to care for stats, or to know the averages of every cricketer in history down to three decimal places, but the fact is, he does.

Meet Ricky Ponting off the field and the small talk is awkward and stuttering. Start talking about cricket, anything to do with cricket, and away he goes, like one of his beloved greyhounds flying the lids.

The irony is that somehow, that incredible cricket brain just never quite flourished when it counted on the field. His bat flourished, too many times to mention. But his tactical mind was somehow locked away, valuable as gold bullion in a safety deposit box, but just as inaccessible.

And then one day his brain snapped. More than once, actually, though the most recent occasion, his inexcusable ball slam and hissy fit after a near collision with rookie team-mate Steve Smith, was the last straw. He’d clearly been there long enough with the “c” beside his name.

Ricky says he wasn’t tapped on the shoulder, that he chose his moment himself. Well, as seasoned Channel Seven and Sky News sports reporter Jim Wilson told me at today’s event “cricket captains don’t go quietly, they have to be taken out in a body bag.” It’s a fair point.

Anyway, he’s gone now. And will bat on, if selected, which he will be. Other countries routinely retain a deposed skipper as a player, but it hasn’t happened in Australia for 30 years. Kim Hughes lasted just a couple of Tests after Border took over. Here’s hoping Ponting does a little better.

69 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • fairsfair says:

      02:11pm | 29/03/11

      Firsty, I am appauled to lean that Ricky is not short for anything. His name is actually Ricky. Good god.

      Secondly - so Michael Clarke is now captain? Nooooooooooooooooo! When tubs handed over the reins to Ponting it was exciting. He was young, up and coming, good at Cricket. Are we really replacing Ponting with Clarke? If thats the case, we should have kept Ponting until he was ready to completely walk away.

    • Eskimo says:

      02:33pm | 29/03/11

      I’m pretty sure Steve Waugh captained the side between Taylor & Ponting.

    • fairsfair says:

      02:49pm | 29/03/11

      woops sorry I know - I realised as soon as I hit submit I had put tubs instead of stevo. My bad.

    • Gladys says:

      03:37pm | 29/03/11

      Horrifyingly bad choice of name for a child from Tasmania. They really were setting him up for ridicule. Particularly as he is short.

    • fairsfairisamoron says:

      03:51pm | 29/03/11

      Tubs handed over the reigns to Ponting?
      Don’t think so douchebag.
      You diss a mans name and don’t even get your facts straight.

    • fairsfair says:

      04:42pm | 29/03/11

      Gosh, I also spelled “learn” wrong. What a complete failure. I do apologise. 

      You don’t make mistakes though clearly, for if you did I’d have to hand over the douchebag “reigns” to you champ.

    • NicoleG says:

      05:19pm | 29/03/11

      No fairsfair, that toss bag did not make a mistake. Unfortunately his parents did. I do hope he learns from their mistake.

      And douchebag is so American.

    • Primate says:

      05:48pm | 29/03/11

      NicoleG
      I know, Australian women know very little about feminine hygiene.
      Perhaps they should look into the douchebag.

    • fairsfair says:

      06:10pm | 29/03/11

      As an insult it is rather American. 

      Oh and since when have women in the 21st century ever had to douche? I am sure most people who call each other douchebags don’t know the difference between a douchebag and a douche. Times have changed since the days of the Primate. Like the availability of running water etc. If you hung around women capable of effectively bathing themselves Badger, perhaps you’d be aware of that.

    • NicoleG says:

      06:15pm | 29/03/11

      Primate, please feel free to crawl back under your rock. Goose!

    • NicoleG says:

      06:54pm | 29/03/11

      Hi 5 fairsfair!!!

    • EasyTiger says:

      08:57pm | 29/03/11

      Fairsfair, I was appalled to see your use of “appauled”.  Don’t go bagging others when it appears you are unable to maintain a reasonable standard yourself.

      As for Ponting, he had his failings as we all do.  What you can’t question is his determination and love for a battle on the pitch.  Other cricketers, who these days seem to view playing for Australia as a means to their next Aston Martin can (and will) learn a lot from him.

    • fairsfair says:

      09:21am | 30/03/11

      I don’t think Clarke will be as good a captain as Ponting. If they are going to replace Ponting with Clarke for the sake of it, they should have just left Ponting where he is and hopefully when RP is ready to fully retire there will be a better option available to the team.

      I think Ponting has been a good captain.

      My heartfelt apology to Ricky - I am sorry I personally attacked your ability to spell (I think I did, that appears to be what I am in trouble for).

    • Max Redlands says:

      02:25pm | 29/03/11

      I usually find Ian Chappell’s comments and opinions credible, however, I could not agree with his recent assessment that Ponting was a good captain. Erratic would be my adjective of choice.

      In my view Cricket Australia has a lot for which to answer. Following the retirement of St. Waugh there is no doubt in my mind that Warne should have been made captain, his his extra-cricketular activities notwithstanding. For mine his knowledge of the game and preparedness to take a calcualted risk indicated a man emminently suited to leading the team on the field. Further to this they (CA) annointed Clarke as Pontings’ sucessor about five minutes after he (Clarke) made the team and it seems an alternative to him has not been considered and does not exist. Unfortunately, I doubt Clarke’s ability to lead will be much better than Ponting’s. In fact, as the article points out , despite his failings as a tactician, Ponting at least stood by his team- mates and appeared to have their respect. Clarke gives the impression of being a little too self-absorbed to even fit that part of the bill.

    • Matthew says:

      03:42pm | 29/03/11

      I can’t believe they haven’t tried to get Warney as a spin coach.  I don’t like the man for what he does off field, but when you hear him talk about spin (usually from the commentary box), he’s so passionate and he’s an open book.  Has been for a very long time.  Can you imagine the true secrets he has deep inside that some of our young spinners could get out?  I think Cricket Australia is as blindfolded about this as Ricky captaining.

    • Vaunted says:

      01:13am | 30/03/11

      It’s a bit hard to blame Ponting for the decline in Australian competitiveness. The players he was asked to lead after the departure of Hayden, McGrath, Warnre, Gilchrist et al have with notable exceptions like Watson been increasingly inept. How can anyone set a field for the complete and unadulterated rubbish bowled by Tait and others who undid all of Ponting’s lion hearted contribution with the bat. Its the selectors who have everything to answer for and it is they who ought to be stepping down.

    • GB says:

      02:30pm | 29/03/11

      Sadly, Clarke is our only option at the moment. All the other potential candidates are either past it (Katich & Hussey), should just worry about keeping their spot (Haddin), or are so out of form they wouldn’t even warrant selection for their state side at the moment (White). Lean days ahead methinks.

    • Gerard says:

      06:08pm | 29/03/11

      Why not Katich as a short-term option? Better to have someone competent for 1-2 years if there’s no obvious long-term option than entrenching someone younger who’s not up to standard. Let Katich captain for now and see if White’s form improves or if Haddin really nails down his spot in the meantime.

    • Shifter says:

      02:39pm | 30/03/11

      @Gerard - using the same logic, why not M Hussey?

    • Gerard says:

      05:58pm | 30/03/11

      Nothing wrong with Hussey as captain, it’s just that I think Katich would be a better option. Hussey seems so intense and focused on what he personally needs to do immediately, and probably better suited to an enthusiastic, hyperactive pump-everyone-up role in the dressing room. Katich seems to always be more mindful of the big picture- and more likely to pull players into line when required. Just based on my impressions from watching them play of course.

    • David says:

      03:09pm | 29/03/11

      All i can say is that Ponting was a very bad sports man , and set a bad example for the kiddies.

    • antiCHRIST says:

      07:38am | 30/03/11

      I agree. His temper tantrums and dummy spits reflected badly on Australians in general.  You d hope someone picked as a captain to lead a national sports team would be able to keep his emotions under wraps.  Some role model.  Now they re going to replace one out of form captain with another. Unbelievable

    • Rose says:

      09:49pm | 30/03/11

      The Australian Cricket team under Poning were a very unlikeable bunch, arrogant, poor sports and generally way too full of themselves. For the first time in my life I heard Australians willing them to lose the Ashes, just to stick the wind up them (I agreed). Hopefully Pup can bring some sportsmanship back to the side and make us proud of them again.

    • neil says:

      03:09pm | 29/03/11

      So the only question now is will CA have the balls to promote White to the test captancy over Clark who couldn’t handle the pressure of the 20/20 captancy?

    • PJ says:

      03:46pm | 29/03/11

      White??? What does he bring the table?  White will be dropped soon.

    • Andrew says:

      03:50pm | 29/03/11

      White? How does white at the moment merit selection in any team?

      Clarke wasn’t suited to T20 but couldn’t say no to being offered captain of the side, he did extremley well in the ODI he captained and that is probably a better thing to go by than t20.

    • GB says:

      03:59pm | 29/03/11

      White is an excellent captain Neil. No doubt about that. His problem is that he hasn’t been able to hit the ball off the square for 12 months. No way he gets the gig. He’d struggle to get a game for Victoria at the moment the way he is hitting the ball.

    • Lapun Pinis says:

      05:42pm | 29/03/11

      WHITE!!!!!  He is an even worse batsman than Ponting these days.

    • Woodsy says:

      03:16pm | 29/03/11

      The man was heralded a genius when he was able to maintain the winning streak when he had a few modern day greats in his team - and let’s be honest, any team with Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist, Hayden, Langer and Lee at his peak would pants any opposition - yet the loss of those players has seen the man, who will arguably go down as one of our all-time greats, treated like Colonel Sanders at a PETA rally. There is only so much one man can do with the relatively inexperienced players that have come and gone through CA’s apparent revolving door policy. I hope he can return to his best - or close to it - and go out on a high that such a great cricketing talent deserves.

    • Davido says:

      03:17pm | 29/03/11

      Ponting was the greatest captain this country has known.

      In test cricket he lead the team to 48 wins. 7 more than the nearest captain.

      In one-day cricket he lead the team to 164 wins at a 71.93% win loss ratio. A massive 57 wins more than his next best rival.

      His win loss ratio is the best of any captain who has played more than a 100 matches: more than 3 wins to each loss.

      In world cup finals he has a win loss ratio as captain of 26 wins against 2 losses. This win loss ratio of greater than 89 percent is unlikely to ever be matched.

      He captained two world cup wins - unequalled again. In doing so, he took more catches than any other Australian ever has, more runs than any other Australian.

      Let the ignorant knockers hang their heads in shame.

    • Steve says:

      03:28pm | 29/03/11

      Err..how many times did he lose the ashes? also I could have been a winning captain with the likes of Warne and McGrath

    • Labrat says:

      03:45pm | 29/03/11

      Couldnt have been said any better Davido.

      Ponting will be surely remembered in the future as a great cricketer/captain/batsman for this country.

      As a keen watcher of cricket the future of this team with clarke at the helm terrifies me, wins are going to be few and far between. The sheer lack of depth and talent of cricket in the country peaked a while back and has never looked like making a comeback, under the current administration.

      Surely if they wish to replace ponting, the coach/selectors/CA management is due for a cleanout as well.

      To all the knockers who say ‘oh but he had gilchrist, haydos, warne, mcgrath etc’ this is true but its up to man management and a solid skipper to get them all to fire to their full potentials.

    • Matthew says:

      03:48pm | 29/03/11

      That makes me laugh Davido.  Most successful based on the number of wins.  Next is Steve Waugh right?  What’s that, Ricky captained for 7 years compared to Steve’s 5.  BY GOSH! Maybe he played more games as captain too.

      *researches for about 5 seconds* oh look, RP played 80 games and won 48,  SW played 57 and 41 (as captain).  That’s 60% for RP and 71% for SW!!!

      I too could be better than Ricky Ponting, just need to captain for 20 years and have glenn mcgrath, warne, gilchrist, hayden, langer and the likes for half the time I captain.

      (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Australia_national_cricket_captains)

    • mw says:

      03:48pm | 29/03/11

      Statistics here again to save the world from the truth through the magic of numbers.

      Ponting was a great cricketer. I’m not sure he still is his form over the last two years probably would have seen him dropped if he were anyone but the captain… well actually maybe not… CA do love leaving old out of form batsmen in the side to ensure the youngsters don’t get any experience… anyway…

      Ponting was never a great captain. It’s all well and good to toss around statistics about, but when it comes down to it the statistics are toss. Looking at the broader context Australia went from having the best team in the world with a lack lustre captain to having a mediocre team with a lack lustre captain…

      Strategically and tactically Ponting brought nothing to the captaincy. I don’t think that’s his fault. Everyone is wired differently and I don’t believe it’s something he has in him. He’s done a great job in a role he was never suited to… and lets hope that now he is no longer captain he can regain some form with the bat.

    • Matthew says:

      03:56pm | 29/03/11

      Also Davido, your logic would mean that Mark Waugh is a far superior batsmen to Sir Donald Bradman.  MW got 8000 test runs to DB’s 7000.

    • Tim H says:

      04:39pm | 29/03/11

      Matthew, the same things you’re saying about Ponting having strong teammates winning the game for him - can be similarly said for Steve Waugh, Mark Taylor, Border, etc.

      It doesn’t really work in your favour. Or to the favour of any of the Ponting bashers who use it as a point to refute his calibre.

      Ponting has actually captained the country through its first genuine period of decline in over 20 years.

      Try to tell me that any of Ponting’s predecessors had more terrible opening batsman during an Ashes campaign than Phil Hughes (TWICE)... or a more talentless spin option than Xavier Doherty… and shall eat my hat.

      You have to say it with a straight face too.

    • DaisyDuke says:

      06:31pm | 29/03/11

      TimH is right Matthew, Tugger had Waugh and McGrath in every one of his games as captain (aside from injuries) - they retired 4 years ago though, since which Ponting has captained

      Also Steve, the Ashes were lost even with Waugh and McGrath in the team (2005)

      Hats off to Punter, after he retires we will be bemoaning the turnstile that becomes the 1st drop position as someone tries to fill his boots.

    • DaisyDuke says:

      07:29pm | 29/03/11

      Warne* and McGrath in the team

    • Matthew says:

      09:00am | 30/03/11

      Hey Daisy, which Waugh was it that was still playing in 2005?  Steve retired in ‘04 and Mark before that.  Unless you mean Shane Waugh. wink

      Tim, Border didn’t have a good team and was up against the great WI team. 

      Tubby had a young team of soon to be greats.  Yes Warne was performing well then but Gilchrist and ponting didn’t come in until half way through his captaincy.  Both were still young and hadn’t reached their peaks.  Hayden and Langer barely made it into the team during his tenure.

      And then there’s Waugh, yes he had a good team at the top of their prime, but he also far better results.  Unfortunately Wikipedia doesn’t indicate how much a game was won by.

    • Davido says:

      12:43pm | 30/03/11

      For those who think Steve Waugh did better take a look at these stats where both captains shared the same team players:

      :for the 42 matches post handover - until Warne and McGrath retired - Ponting captained the team to 33 wins out of 42 matches. An incredible 80+%. During which he captained the team to a world record of 16 straight consecutive wins.

      :by way of comparison, Waugh, in the 42 matches up to handover - with the same team, won an impressive 30 matches - some 71%.

      So not only does he compare more favourably, he had to do it at no.3 (unlike Waugh who was well protected down the order) and endure one of the most dreadful character assassinations a sports person has ever had to endure.

      Let the stats speak for themselves.

    • MC says:

      03:22pm | 29/03/11

      The man is a deadset legend,  arguably our greatest batsmen since sir Donald. He was a ruthless competitor who’s captaincy at times has been unfairly criticised. The statistics show that he had a greater winning % than Steve Waugh before the host of retirements of our champion players, and he had them in the twilight of their careers. Could any of the other players have captained the side better than Ponting. Doubtful. Could they have captained it worse. Certainly. As both a captain and a player he was selfless, putting his side and his country ahead of anything or anyone.

      All good things must come to an end, and this a perfect time for him to exit the captaincy. The next serious cricket series is some time away, and I think everyone can see that his life as an elite cricketer is drawing to a close, as they all inevitably do. I pity the next man to take over from him, as the current vice captain isn’t fit to carry Ponting’s kit bag. Sadly, neither is anyone else.

    • David says:

      03:34pm | 29/03/11

      He was a bad sport though. Very ungracious in defeat, and always blaming others. Not a good look for the kiddie’s.

    • Mumsy says:

      03:35pm | 29/03/11

      Never liked his spitting and hand rubbing. Yuk!

    • fairsfair says:

      03:56pm | 29/03/11

      tubs’ gum was pretty rank too.

    • Scott says:

      03:53pm | 29/03/11

      Look at all the whingers in here, how many of you actually watch cricket? The man won 2 World Cups as captain, could you name me the other captains to have done that? Sure he lost the Ashes but plenty of captains before him did the same, he also won them 5-0 and won on Indian and South African soil. He has even managed to win series against the likes of South Africa with the joke of a team he currently has to take out on the field. Tall poppy syndrome much? or is just because he didn’t come from NSW of Victoria, had a bogan name and talked to quick so he was an easier target for fat people in armchairs or on their computers? One of the great players of the game and in any country(bar maybe England) he would be revered as a champion, it’s sad our country looks to bring our great sportsman down.

    • Marty says:

      10:55pm | 29/03/11

      “The man won 2 World Cups as captain, could you name me the other captains to have done that?”

      Clive Lloyd - 1975 and 1979.

      Pretty exalted company for RTP.

    • Gerard says:

      10:47pm | 30/03/11

      Okay Scott, now that Marty’s answered your question, could you please name the other captains who have lost Australia 3 Ashes series?

      Oh, and while you’re at it, please cite the test series Ponting won in India. It appears to be missing from the record books.

    • Arthur says:

      03:57pm | 29/03/11

      I just never liked him.

    • Max Redlands says:

      04:19pm | 29/03/11

      No doubt Ponting was a great batsman and fielder but I stand by my comments re his captaincy and agree with those who mention he had a team of great players early on.

      I don’t put much stock in ODI , World Cup or T20 results/statistics. Test cricket is the name of the game and I’m sorry but his Ashes record is not the legacy of a great captain.

    • Ray says:

      05:24pm | 29/03/11

      Paine must ne elevated to a leading role, even as VC to Clarke, if it has to be that way.  Clarke will divide cricket and lose fans, Paine will not.  Youth is the future, but with men not mice!!

    • Simon says:

      06:02pm | 29/03/11

      3 Ashes losses….s s see ya..and I wouldin wanna be yaaa…Have a glass of wine with Keneally - you two suit each other

    • AJ says:

      06:42pm | 29/03/11

      Loved to see Ricky play but it is time to rebuild…

      All I can say is that the decision is “disaPonting” wink

    • Eddie says:

      10:05pm | 29/03/11

      What a ‘Dad’ joke ^

    • biff says:

      06:52pm | 29/03/11

      The punter to be replaced by Clarke? The only thing Clarke is famous for is being Lara Bingle’s handbag. Cricket Australia, wake up.

    • PJ says:

      07:42pm | 29/03/11

      Bet he plays better than you!

    • Mick says:

      08:29pm | 29/03/11

      If more people critiqued Clarke based on his cricket ability and performances they would look much less like utter morons. Lara Bingle is irrelevant for more than one reason.

    • Jan Jones says:

      06:59pm | 29/03/11

      I was fan of Steve Waugh and so I was disappointed when Ricky Ponting replaced him but I think over time Ricky Ponting proved to be a very good captain.  Everyone (the armchair critics) seems to remember his last year and not the previous very good 6 years,  I am sorry to see him go.  As for Clarke - who knows.

    • Gregg says:

      02:19am | 30/03/11

      The three lost ashes series have not just been in the last year and other than for the 5-0 ww between the two lost series in England, Australian cricket has been on a bit of a slide.
      Obviously, the losing of key experienced if older players will have an effect on what any team will achieve regardless of who the captain is.

      And there is a huge problem with the structure of Australian sides in that despite the state shield series being a good testing ground for new players, there has of late been just too little blooding of younger players and with about half the side around 35 YOs and the other half approaching 30, a lot of players have been allowed to play on for far too long.
      There needs to be something of a yard stick of you have an expected batting or bowling performance you need to reliably achieve and if you are not above that for say three straight matches, it’s back to play at state level to compete with allcomers to earn your spot again.

    • TheBigMicka says:

      08:01pm | 29/03/11

      Haddin out, Paine in immediately.  Make Paine Test captain for the next series and Clarke can stay VC.  Ponting to stay in the team and bat at number 5, to be assessed at the end of each subsequent series.  If he doesn’t perform every time, he’s tapped to retire.  That way if he does a Tendulkar and experiences a late renaissance, all good, he stays for one more crack at the Ashes.  If he performs, he’s earnt the right to choose his own exit.  Usman in, Hussey out.  Youth is the only way forward now.  If they’re not going to be playing in the next Ashes there’s no reason for them to be in the team any longer.  Katich, sorry, love ya, but you’re out too.  ODI’s and 20/20 are good fun, but the Ashes are what matters, and that’s where we should be looking.

    • Mick says:

      08:11pm | 29/03/11

      You had an easy day didn’t you Sharwood - you had this written months ago. It remains as based on personality now as it would have then. You are in the camp that delusionally believes that Steve Waugh is a demi-god of some sort. He had a team of champions and batted down the order. Ponting inherited an aging line-up, who left, and then had to spend the past few years with a team including many who wouldn’t crack an old Aust A side when we were so strong we had two teams bash up tourists every summer. And then you go to the ignorant free hit that was his blow up at Steve Smith. I thought that was genius. A means to show his troops he was still having a proper crack and fighting for the pride of the Aussie jumper even against Canada. He caught it. He got over it within split seconds.

    • Jatri says:

      08:58pm | 29/03/11

      At one stage under Ricky Australia held every trophy there was to win.  I would have thought that puts him a head of Steve Waugh as they virtually had the same side. 

      These people who get stuck into Ricky because in their opinion he wasn’t as good Steve Waugh tend to be one of two types 1) from NSW and think it is their God given right to have the AUstralian Captain from their ranks or 2) not watch cricket and get their info from a 2 minute piece on the news.

      He is the best batsman Australia has had since Bradman, was able to be the number 1 batsman in the team and lead it unlike Lara, Tendulkar and many other of his contempories.  If the is the end of Ponting it shame that people are still running an agenda and not celebrating one of finest players of all time.

    • Gregg says:

      08:42pm | 29/03/11

      Ricky has been a great player when in form and if he is into cricketing stats, that may mean he is more a cricketing nerd than a strategist that a great captain needs to be.
      Any of the great cricketing captains would also likely tell you that whilst it would be great for the whole team to be mates, there is no room for favouritism and a Captain needs to keep himself one step removed to be fully effective.

      A few things stand out to me as where Ponting lacked strategy and will power.
      1. That first test match in England where the English tailenders survived a dozen or so overs to fend of defeat and who did Ponting have bowl a handful of overs at the end - Marcus North on a dry dead pitch.
      Maybe even some Clarke Spin or keep the pace up for the tail enders and instead of a defensive field, there was hatdly any pressure put on the tail enders by having close in fielders.
      Sort of stole a possiblity of an ashes victory away to give us defeat.

      On Clarke and for your deputy and a possible future Captain tou would expect a bit of grit and despite Clarke having got amonst the runs often enough, there have also been many occasions when he has gotten out to very loose shots, unnneeded and at times when a dig in and knuckle down was needed.
      I just wonder whether Ricky had it in him to really get up Clarke often enough.

      And then in the WC penultimate failure against Pakistan and in the telling overs where was Lee when he had been on fire earlier - just down at third man until it was too late.
      And seemed as Ricky was putting in a slip after one could have been there too often and likewise in having a forward catcher for the spinner, his mind just not there.
      There have been quite a few other times when his decision making has been questionable, just as the true grit of Clarke is questionable.

      Both players are probably in the position where the captaincy has been foisted upon them because our selectors are not bringing enough new blood through to give options.

    • stephen says:

      11:38pm | 29/03/11

      He’s got nothing to apologize for.
      He made Captain, and that’s the pinnacle in Oz sport, and whatever he does now is not his bonus, but ours.

    • Placebo says:

      10:25am | 30/03/11

      Hey ant… How come another post about Cricket??? I thought you were done with cricket for this year raspberry.

      Anyways. I think Ricky was a lucky captain. he had the best team at his disposal. But once the great guns were gone, he couldnt wint a lot… could he? As for Clarke… Ughhh… He is not captain material at all…!!! Katich is a better choice IMO.

    • Adam says:

      02:28pm | 30/03/11

      Found an interesting article on some site mysixcorners.com under the Australian and New Zealand tab that reckons Clarke as captain with ponting playing on is the perfect set up. Interesting take. I tend to agree.

    • Ashley Gray says:

      02:59pm | 30/03/11

      The important thing to remember, and it is completely overlooked by the misty-eyed Ponting Nostalgics is that in his last 20 tests he has scored at an average of 35 - 20 below his career average. It’s a figure worthy of an Englishman or a hard-working Bangladeshi, but it is way below par for an Australian number three. He should have shown the courage to step down from the team full stop. Instead, he’ll be clogging up our top order along with has-been Hussey and co for another few years.

    • Wilma J Craig says:

      07:01pm | 30/03/11

      Anthony, just what are your qualifications to decide whether or not Ponting is the right person to be the Capatain of the Australian Cricket team?
      Have you ever even played cricket, let alone represented Australia?
      If you have played where & when did you do so? Did you ever play cricket as a member of a team which was Captained by Ponting?
      If you answer No to any of those questions then, Anthony, kindly shut up.
      Or are you just another self-appointed expert when in fact you are nothing more than an “armchair sportsman”, stubby in one hand, ciggy in the other, screaming at the TV?
      Ponting has been at the receiving end of continual abuse by journalists just like you for as long as he has been the Captain. You never, ever give him any credit - even when he makes a decent score! You damned know-it-all-know-nothing journalists have been on a crusade against Ponting from day one. Australia has been “Top of the Heap” for years & continually throught the Ponting’s captaincy. No country can expect to stay there for ever. It was inevitable that eventually Australia would lose the crown. That was not down to Ponting for he did noit sselect the team. The selectors did that.

    • Gerard says:

      08:22pm | 30/03/11

      Wilma, considering your own criteria (must have played in a team captained by Ponting), who do you suggest should be responsible for selecting the captain? Marcus North?

      And no, Ponting has not been “at the receiving end of continual abuse by journalists for as long as he has been the Captain”. I don’t recall much negative press when he won the 2003 World Cup. The criticism only started on a large scale with his multitude of cock-ups which contributed to the 2005 Ashes loss.

    • Lyddy says:

      03:40pm | 23/11/11

      Well done article that. I\‘ll make sure to use it wilsey.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter