Matthew Hayden says 50 over cricket is as cooked as a BBQ snapper. In the mind of Shane Warne, it’s as over as his marriage, though he believes it should be resuscitated every four years for the World Cup. 50 over cricket, that is.

The farcical finish to the 2007 World Cup could be a sign that we have entered the late evening of 50 over cricket's life. Pic: AP.

Even Cricket Australia is reducing next year’s domestic one day cricket program, after tinkering heavily with the format this year, in the surest sign yet officialdom is downgrading its commitment to one day cricket. That, after it did away with the 12 match triangular series two years ago in favour of a more streamlined summer international 50 over program.

The fact is, 50 over cricket is a game being squeezed out of existence.

As Test cricket retains its primacy as the purest form of the game, and T20 thrives at international level, and in domestic leagues like Australia’s Big Bash and India’s IPL, the poor old one-dayer is becoming the unloved middle child.

This might sound crazy as the World Cup kicks off, with all the hype that goes with it. But there’s a good argument the world’s best cricketers are currently battling for the title of champions of a dying game.

The irony of the possible demise of the One Day International is we’ve just passed the milestone of the 40th anniversary of the first ODI match.

Amazingly, the words “tradition” and “one day cricket” are no longer out of place in the same sentence. You’d have been taken out the back and shot if you predicted that in the era of Kerry Packer’s World Series Cricket. But ODIs now have pride of place in our collective memory banks.

We will never forget the Michael Bevan game, when the Aussie leftie hit that last-ball four straight down the ground against the Windies in 1996.

We’ll always remember the chaotic mad scenes in the tied semi final against South Africa in the 1999 World Cup, and Steve Waugh’s “you just dropped the World Cup” sledge during his century the match before.

Neither can we forget the two World Cups Australia won after that, to make it three straight, including Andrew Symonds’ breakthrough ton against Pakistan in 2003 and Gilly’s brutality in the final in the Windies in 2007.

And anyone older than Gen Y will well recall Australia’s surprise 1987 Cup triumph under Allan Border, a victory that set the tone for 20 years of Australian dominance at both Test and one day level.

Those are just the memories viewed through green and gold goggles. We haven’t even touched on Sachin Tendulkar’s incredible, unthinkable 46 ODI centuries, including last year’s incredible double century. Or the ODI heroics of players like Wasim Akram, Viv Richards or Lance Klusener.

Oh, and not forgetting my personal favourite, Chrus Herrus, otherwise known as the brilliant bald NZ all-rounder Chris Harris.

The point is, while there have been loads of forgettable one dayers, as there have been forgettable Test matches, the rich 40 year history of one day cricket makes a mockery of the term hit-and-giggle – a putdown which is now reserved for T20. The ODI has deservedly become a cherished form of the game.

But times change. The world moves on. And there is now simply too much cricket on the table with three competitive forms of the game.

No other sport has this dilemma. Rugby has its traditional XVs and its novelty 7s, which weirdly enough, will soon be an Olympic sport as T20 may one day be. But cricket is alone in trying to balance three versions of itself. Ask Shane Warne how hard it is to keep three lovers going simultaneously. Actually, don’t.

Part of the problem is meaningless matches. When Australia played the seventh, utterly meaningless one dayer against England in Perth recently, leading the series 5-1, selectors were criticised for leaving out star players.

I’m on the players’ side. No offence to the fine city of Perth, but who wants to catch the red-eye with nothing on the line, and two much longer flights the week afterwards to India? The answer to the well-documented problem of player burnout is surely player rotation.

That said, the fan outcry is understandable. You pay your money, you deserve to see the best of the best, especially when a team takes the field calling itself “Australia”. A team with that title should not be, oh, some blokes with kangaroos and emus on their passport who happen to know how to bat or bowl a bit. It should be the 11 best Australians available for that format.

But that’s not always possible now. How can it be when players have the competing demands of two, maybe three forms of the same game. Most players are now only specialising in two forms of the game, like Cameron white, who plays only limited overs cricket, or Clarke and Ponting, who have both dropped T20 for Tests and ODIs.

All the same, wouldn’t it be preferable if the Test guys were were always fresh for Tests, the T20 guys were always fresh for T20s, and those few who truly excel at both - like Shane Watson - were always available for both forms.

Putting the cherished ODI to sleep would enable that. Like I say, no one wants to do this. But this is about a bigger picture. Hey, even the cute dogs at the pound get the needle sometimes.

Right now, the ICC has no plans to shelve 50 over cricket. But you can bet that less ODIs will be played between this World Cup and the next. And even fewer between the next two, as the 50 over game eventually dwindles into irrelevance.

As for Shane Warne’s idea of retaining the World Cup while playing no one dayers between times, forget it. To use another animal analogy, that’s like preserving a critically endangered species in a zoo with no intention of reintroducing it to the wild. You might as well give up.

Cricket needs room to breathe. As Aron Ralston, the real life hero behind the hit movie 127 hours showed, sometimes you have to amputate a limb to save the body.

Most commented

44 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • S.L says:

      06:48am | 18/02/11

      The one day cricket World Cup is on? Who cares!

    • MarK says:

      07:02am | 18/02/11

      I do.

      We might win it.

    • TimB says:

      07:06am | 18/02/11

      Well our team hasn’t lost a world cup match in 12 years. I’d kinda like to see that continue, so I care smile

      It’s going to be tough as hell though.

    • TChong says:

      07:44am | 18/02/11

      Have to agree with MarK, and TimB on this one.
      ( I know fellas, we are all probaly in shock) !
      As the olympic crowd say, sports is above politics.

    • Faz says:

      09:24am | 18/02/11

      The irony is that one-day cricket is so young that there isn’t a strong band of ‘traditionalists’ to defend it.

      One day cricket? So five minutes ago!

    • Luce says:

      10:09am | 18/02/11

      I care! One day cricket is the bomb…

    • Charlie says:

      10:43am | 18/02/11

      TimB we’ve lost a couple of matches… just managed to win the ones that count

    • TimB says:

      11:35am | 18/02/11

      Charlie which matches did we lose?

      We currently sit on a streak of 29 games without a loss. You might remember we won the last three cups, with the team going undefeated in 2003 & 2007.
      And if it wasn’t for that pesky draw against South Africa in 1999, our winning streak would be 29 too, and not the 23 that it currently sits at

    • mary monica roche says:

      01:59pm | 18/02/11

      If Tim BO likes one day cricket then everyone does.
      I prefer one day picnics at the beach instead! More action is there.

    • Ben says:

      07:22pm | 18/02/11

      yeah lost a couple of group matches in last few cups but no doubt aussies world cup specialists.

    • TimB says:

      09:50pm | 18/02/11

      “yeah lost a couple of group matches in last few cups but no doubt aussies world cup specialists. “


      Gyah. No we didnt! Last two cups- Undefeated!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cricket_World_Cup#Australian_treble

      This is such a minor thing I know, but its important to get cricket history correct smile

    • deb says:

      06:59am | 18/02/11

      i loves my cricket,dont go messing with 50 overs,you hear?
      in fact get rid of the test matchs and give me 20/20 or 50 overs any day.

    • John Ryan says:

      08:14pm | 18/02/11

      why the hell would you watch cricket,they are trying to turn it into Baseball,so just watch Baseball a much more interesting game anyway,20/20 is a waste, 50 is even worse, the only cricket worth watching is test 5 day cricket the rest is rubbish

    • Ian says:

      07:01am | 18/02/11

      The sun is setting on one day cricket…what else is new!!!

    • Ruth says:

      07:07am | 18/02/11

      I can guarantee I’m seeing that most here in the sub-continent do care… A lot

    • TimB says:

      07:47am | 18/02/11

      They do indeed. I believe it’s supposed to be the 3rd biggest sporting event on the planet, (behind the Soccer world cup & the Summer Olympics of course). Mostly due to the sub-continent audience.

    • Macca says:

      10:29am | 18/02/11

      Let’s get the chinese playing cricket then

    • Mikeymike says:

      05:44pm | 18/02/11

      @ Macca:  Now that’s a good idea…

    • Mark Barker says:

      07:28am | 18/02/11

      I agree, cricket formats are not to dissimilar to music formats.

      Test cricket is vinyl, which is likely to be loved for ever by purists and die hard fans.

      ODI are the compact disks that took over the market like a storm, and were at the time thought irreplaceable.

      Then along comes 20/20, the undoubtable MP3 format of cricket.

      People still purchase vinyl and everyone goes crazy for the iPod, but who has bought a CD recently?

    • Chrus says:

      03:00pm | 18/02/11

      A great analogy. However, I think the 50 over game is the best. I love test cricket, but find life gets in the way of the whole 5 days. T20 doesn’t work for me. It misses the middle 30 overs grind, something that NZ with “Chrus Herrus” (and Larsen, Coney, and Astle for that matter) used to great effect. Keep the daynighters going! (I buy CDs still, occasionally)

    • Macca says:

      07:35am | 18/02/11

      50 Over cricket has so much more diversity than T20. There is plenty of room for the traditionalists (both fans and those who actually wield the willow) and there is nothing better than a full day at the SCG when I have a result at the end of the day and can retire to The Clock Hotel for more beer.

    • AFR says:

      07:57am | 18/02/11

      We just played a 7 match series, in which 6 or those games played to packed houses (the exception being the second game in Sydney on an extremely hot Wedensday, with the series already decided). And befoer you say “yeah, but it was against England”, the Barmy Army had long gone home, and from where I sat at the two Sydney games, it was Aussie cricket fans making up the overwhelming majoritty of the crowd. I think ODI cricket is a long way from dead.

    • Nafe says:

      10:47am | 18/02/11

      They need to bring back the Summer triangular series though.

    • AFR says:

      02:30pm | 18/02/11

      Nafe, I don’t agree. What is the point of Sri Lanka playing South Africa in Hobart on a Tuesday, to then decide who plays Australia in a 3 match “final” series?

    • iansand says:

      08:21am | 18/02/11

      One day cricket was going to be the end of test cricket.  Tests survive and 50 over stuff is introuble.

    • Marrickvillian says:

      09:01am | 18/02/11

      ODIs have a place, because unlike 20:20 they bear some resemblance to proper cricket. Bowlers can build spells and batters can build innings. Skills other than all-out attack and desperate defence get a guernsey.
      I suspect that 20:20 will become like baseball. Even great teams will win 60% of games and a very select few players will be consistent match-winners. And as the largely-empty baseball stadia across America attest as that season grinds on through its 160-game roster, there’s only so much an audience can take.

    • Justin says:

      09:50am | 18/02/11

      I said it last time (in the piece about the expanded Big Bash). This push for night cricket alienates a lot of people. At least with one dayers, half of it happens during the day (more if they’re played in WA & you’re in WA). With T20, you aren’t going to pick up the casual listeners/viewers that day time cricket gets.

    • ibast says:

      10:07am | 18/02/11

      I don’t like one day cricket.  The only part of the match that is relevant is the last 3 overs.  And that true is only if it’s close.  I don’t watch 20:20 either, for the same reasons except that 20:20 is even less of a contest.  Test cricket is the only one worth watching as every ball counts.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:21am | 18/02/11

      “Matthew Hayden says 50 over cricket is as cooked as a BBQ snapper”

      How dare he!

      MarK, i’ve just set fire to that signed bat on principle. Sorry.

    • TimB says:

      10:43am | 18/02/11

      You should have had it delivered to Oakeshott, and set it on fire *then*.

      ...somehow. I haven’t really thought this through smile

    • fairsfair says:

      01:14pm | 18/02/11

      Holy Tim(uni)B(omber) wink

      I think I will just send him he charred remains then. Kill two birds with one stone and all that.

      I likes your thinking.

    • gavin says:

      11:42am | 18/02/11

      The problem with ODI cricket is that its not that much different from T20. They’ve both got similar rules, like power plays and fielding and bowling restrictions. I say, get rid of the power plays and the fielding/bowling restrictions. Make it a more challenging contest where the fielding team has more options, placing it it half-way between Test and T20 cricket. Games may not last the full 100 overs, but thats not necessarily a bad thing. Batsmen already have enough of an advantage in the shortest form of the game.

    • Rev says:

      01:38pm | 18/02/11

      gavin…that will just equal less boundaries and more singles.  The short formats are about entertainment, and there isn’t much spectacle in a lazy push to long-off. 

      And games not lasting 100 overs more often than not will be a disaster.  If the TV advertising revenue isn’t there, neither will the game.

    • macca-d says:

      01:00pm | 18/02/11

      I really can’t be bothered watching 20Twenty.  (Maybe paradoxically)  I actually find it the most bland form of cricket.

    • Richard says:

      01:13pm | 18/02/11

      The way I see it, you would never see an innings quite like the masterpiece played by Shane Watson in the opening one dayer against England this summer in another form of the game.

      He faced the very first ball and batted superbly for the entire 50 overs to chase down a record total at the MCG, before hitting a 6 in the final over to win the game.

      It was 161 of the greatest runs I’ve ever seen be scored, and that just wouldn’t have happened in T20, and probably not in test matches either.

      Which I why I will always watch ODI’s, and prefer them over T20 games.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      05:29pm | 18/02/11

      Very good call indeed Richard.

      I would also put forward Glenn McGrath’s bowling in 1999. He had to get Tendulkar, he got him.had to get Lara. Got him. Some bloke called Warne went all right in the tourney too

    • Guy Lee Hanlon the Nothing Bloke says:

      01:54pm | 18/02/11

      Your comment:
      Cricket will run out of tired gimmicks eventually.
      In the 1960s, it was two man cricket with 6 overs per two person team.
      each two man side had six overs each.
      It died soon after it came.
      then it was the 40 over 8 balls over one day cricket which became 50 overs 6 balls per over cricket. Its 1971 to whenever.
      Now its 20 overs cricket which will be dead before long.
      what next ,cricket? Rubber ball test cricket??Rubber ball 20 over cricket?

    • stephen says:

      02:37pm | 18/02/11

      Over 50 cricket’s on it’s knees, (like Warnie, but for a different reason).
      But the next Test is in August with Sri Lanka. A long way away.
      Coincidence ?
      Don’t think so. Cricket Oz is having a tug if it thinks the locals are gonna fall for anything else but the real-deal.

    • guy lee hanlon the nothing bloke says:

      03:43pm | 18/02/11

      Limited Overs cricket will always survive as people with limited minds,limited time,limited interest, limited beauty, limited personality , and limited money will always enjoy limited overs cricket.
      Replace the cricket ball with a rubber ball or the tennis ball or a soft ball and cricket’s popularity would soar.
      Protective gear would no longer be needed in hot weather.

    • Ray says:

      04:56am | 19/02/11

      Its greed on the part of the administrators that keeps the format alive. The game no longer belongs to us, the public, it belongs to TV and advertisers. I went to a game recently where, the water boys spent more time on the ground that some batsmen and it gave you the impression that these so called breaks in play(and there is an ever increasing number of them) are simply to satisfy TV.

    • Debrah says:

      07:54am | 21/11/11

      Yeah, that’s the tciekt, sir or ma’am

    • guild wars 2 gold says:

      06:38am | 22/10/12

      I would like to show some thanks to you just for rescuing me from this type of scenario. Just after checking through the internet and coming across concepts that were not beneficial, I assumed my life was well over. Living without the presence of strategies to the problems you have sorted out as a result of this guideline is a critical case, and the kind that might have badly damaged my entire career if I hadn’t encountered your web page. Your own skills and kindness in playing with all things was priceless. I am not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t discovered such a stuff like this. I can now relish my future. Thanks for your time very much for your specialized and sensible help. I will not be reluctant to propose the website to any individual who needs to have counselling about this area.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @PSyvret: As if anyone needs reminding of the bigoted pond-scum out there, this arrived in my in-box this morning: http://t.co/Lfu5ntmq

Daniel Piotrowski

@christoforpaine hope youre OK.. and the bali trip is still on!

Paul Colgan

RT @BusInsiderAU: WATCH: Will Smith Does A Fresh Prince Rap Reprise On British TV - http://t.co/Filsoi00AT

Paul Colgan

ping @TheStalwart - Ireland looking at phasing out Apple's tax arrangements http://t.co/fZESvMZJsW

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter