For anyone who missed the Governor General’s speech opening Parliament yesterday we might be able to source you a copy, but the North Koreans are rumoured to have snapped them all up and are attempting to weaponise the material.

We've a new version for you, Crook's just crossed the floor. Photo: Kym Smith

The Punch counted at least five people asleep in the public galleries of the Senate during Quentin Bryce’s speech, and that’s not counting some esteemed members of the press gallery.

The Governor General’s speech is written by the Prime Minister and intends to outline the Government’s new term agenda. Besides being very dull, the speech was also an extremely rosy view of how the Gillard Government will negotiate its policy through the new paradigm Parliament. Here’s a more realistic account version of the Governor General’s speech:

Broadband:

The Government intends to roll out a national broadband network.  This will be popular as the interwebs will be more available to everyone, as will the hot males, or such is my understanding of the workings of the interweb. This will cost the tax payer an estimated $43 billion. We say estimated because we don’t have a business plan. Plus the Opposition will be blocking it with Malcolm Turnbull leading charge so expect a lot of censure motions. By more realistic calculations this thing will be finished in 2024 when broadband will be made redundant by internet linked via eyebrow wiggles.

Foreign Affairs:

Look, at this point the Government’s Foreign Affairs policy is pretty much to send Kevin Rudd over to East Timor to ask one of the poorest countries in the world to take our boat people. This is also pretty awkward because Kevin said he wasn’t very keen on this the night Julia stabbed him the back. Julia has a whole series of cool trips planned, it’s just that Tony has now said that he won’t let her go anywhere otherwise she could lose Government.

Climate change:

Yea well, during the election Julia said they’d be a people’s assembly to decide on climate change. Then we all accepted that was a pretty dumb idea. Now we’re going to have a climate committee, which Julia’s going to head up and Bob Brown is also going to sit in on it. Continuing his tradition of making Julia’s life hell, Tony has decided that he won’t turn up. Tony is secretly hoping that Bob will ban electricity after 9 pm and require everyone to wear hats fitted with electricity generating windmills. This could get wacky for all of us, especially the Government trying to hold it together.

Regional Australia:

The Government is just going to dump money on these guys in the hope that voters in the rural independents electorates remain happy enough their members backed a Labor government - because they certainly didn’t vote for one. Simon Crean has accused Tony Abbott of being a wrecker, by not allowing him to be absent so he could give an address to the National Press Club on his plans for rural Austrakua. So Abbott’s wrecking tactics can’t be all that bad I suppose.

Mining tax:

The Government intends to introduce a Minerals Resource Rent Tax, otherwise known as the mining tax, or “great big new mining tax” depending on who you ask. We’d like to go into more detail but really I may as well say the Government has a policy for some kinda tax thingy on the mines at some stage. The Government already changed their minds once on this thing and now the new parliament wants more changes. This means it will be more or less the same, but instead of taxing mining profits it may only apply to bananas from Costa Rica.

In conclusion, the only sure thing about the Government’s new parliament agenda is that we dont’ know what will happen, and if you thinks all of this sounds crazy and unstable wait until those new Greens Senators and the guy from the DLP turn up. 

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

101 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Komet says:

      06:33am | 29/09/10

      I caught the replay on ABC last night - I was having trouble sleeping. Sure solved that problem.

      Same’ol. Julia sounds like she is giving a quarterly report to shareholders. I did not think it was possible for me to ‘turn off’ anymore than I did with Rudd, I was wrong.

    • tom says:

      11:15am | 29/09/10

      Why is Abbott a wrecker for saying he wouldn’t provide a pair for Mr Crean to do a speech at the Press Club when Parliament is sitting?

      Isn’t Parliament the perfect forum for Minister’s to announce policy?

    • Sam Spade says:

      05:13pm | 29/09/10

      Tom, please learn how to use an apostrophe properly!

    • jf says:

      12:52pm | 30/09/10

      Leave him alone Sam Spade. He may be a greengrocer.

    • nosthow says:

      06:57am | 29/09/10

      Well its all looking better day by day for the Gillard government I reckon Leo. Slipper now Deputy Speaker , Tony Crook deciding he can best serve his electorate as an Independent and not as a plaything of Abbott the Wrecker. As for the broadband its full steam ahead. Poor Malcolm Turnbull, the email expert, has drunk deeply from Abbotts poisened chalice in accepting the commision to “smash” the NBN despite it being one of the main reasons the Independents ditched the big loser Abbott. Climate Change - well heres a point Abbott has nothing to say on except “Climate change is Crap” he said ! Big vote loser there Tony ! No Leo what the Coalition need is a leader of vision who is up to date with modern Australia not a throw back to the 1950’s, and a poor one at that, they have in Abbott. Of course when you look through the Coalition ranks no one of any real substance jumps out at you. Maybe in another 6-9 years someone may emerge - in the meantime its a bunch of clowns led by the head funnyman himself Tones Abbott !

    • Gabrielle says:

      07:58am | 29/09/10

      nosthow…assuming that’s your real name…explain the economic benefit (based on actual analysis) and the the inherent risks of the NBN for us please. While you’re crunching the numbers…can you check BER, insulation, green schemes, mining tax, etc introduced by Labor. Oh sorry…can you also let me know how much my electricity bill will be in 12 mths when the carbon tax is in. Hurray for the blind labor patriots who voted for idiots to hike up my cost of living!

    • Max Vaunted says:

      08:01am | 29/09/10

      Okay nosthow, so you loathe, fear, detest, despise, dislike, abhor, execrate and are repelled by Tony Abbott. But do you have anything constructive, positive, witty or informative to contribute to the discussion? Or was that it?

    • Rosie says:

      08:09am | 29/09/10

      Do you ever read the article before posting such trivia?????

      In case you didn’t understand it was about a speech written by Gillard and read by the Governor General, mother in law of one of Labor’s faceless men, Billy Boy Shorten that instigated to Gillard the knifing of the nation’s elected PM, Kevin Rudd to whom she was supposedly his loyal deputy.

      You poor thing! You just can’t get Tony Abbott out of your mind!

    • TimB says:

      08:10am | 29/09/10

      Zzzzzz…...

      Nosthow have you thought about becoming our next GG?

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      08:16am | 29/09/10

      nosthow :  Hmmm , desperation is really turning up in your posts . Can’t imagine you willl convince many with this load self-delusion.
      Slipper as Deputy did not give Labor a pairing arrangement , just a nominee win , kids stuff. Crook was always going to have his 3 seconds of fame.
      Broadband - ” full steam ahead ”  heh heh heh , still fully uncosted and without any management plan , oh no no no nosthow , lots and lots of hurdles yet, including Malcolm Turnbull , so best of luck with N.B.N.
      Climate change - a vote loser - you got that right - Labor votes that is.
      The carbon tax all over everyday living costs will see Labor as popular as flatulance in a lift.
      Tony Abbott - brought down former P.M. Rudd the dud.- brought the Rudd/Gillard joke to it’s political knees - has his boot on the current Gillard/Greens/Wilkie/Bandt/Oakshott/Windsor/Loopy Left Loony Tunes govt. throat . Does not look too good for Labor , nosthow..

    • Damocles says:

      08:35am | 29/09/10

      @ nosthow (is that supposed to mean “knowest how”, gawd how clever! Hey mate, a wise man (wiser than you I might add) once said, “There is none so blind as he who will not see.” When the day comes, and it will come, that Labor/ Greens/ Independents have royally rooted this country, people such as you can begin another boring, repititious mantra, “It wasn’t us, it was Tony Abbott, he ruined it for everyone! He made us waste all the billions, he allowed all the boat people in, he caused the cost of EVERYTHING to skyrocket, it’s not OUR fault!” I know who the clown is and YOU are making me laugh long and hard!

    • Pete says:

      08:50am | 29/09/10

      Wayne, your post smacks a bit of desperation to, you’ve got to get over the fact that the so called coalition got rolled, they lost it…so once you swallow that bitter pill Wayne, the next thing you possibly need to think about is that that Abbott has mislead the voting public.  Firstly with ‘it’s only true if it’s written down’, and more recently, even if I sign it it’s not necessarily true. He’s not to be trusted Wayne.

    • Bateman says:

      09:04am | 29/09/10

      Gabrielle

      Can you please explain the economic benefit (based on actual analysis) of the Snowy River Hydroelectric project, roads, hospitals, schools?

      I doubt you could but I hope for the love of humanity that you’re intelligent enough to figure out my point.

      Also, maybe your electricity bills won’t be so high if you learn to cut back on a few things that you don’t need.

    • Mike T says:

      09:04am | 29/09/10

      @ Nosthow….

      People that post on the punch are usually passionate supporters of one side or the other, therfore, they naturally have a bias towards the views of a particular party.

      However most people have the ability to sometimes acknowledge things that thier side does wrong or could do better.

      You unfortunately are not one of those people.

      The fact that you will argue black is white or up is down in order to support the ALP gives evidence to the notion that Austrlia must imediatley do away with mandatory voting.

      Can you confrim the reports that your support for the ALP is due to any of the following:
      1. You are a paid employee of the ALP
      2. You get you hair cut at Julia’s BF’s saloon and think he is a “really cool guy who does a cracking cut and foils”
      3. You are also a red head who feels that you guys should “stick together”

    • Jane says:

      09:09am | 29/09/10

      Pete, since honesty is important to you, I’m sure you will castigate Gillard for lying about a carbon tax.  Won’t you?

    • Aitch B says:

      09:19am | 29/09/10

      @Pete

      And Gillard hasn’t mislead the voting public, has she?

      Riiiight…...........

    • Ryan says:

      10:10am | 29/09/10

      I just can’t wait to see Pete’s explanation on Julia Gillard announcing that all her “promises” to the Australian people were not “promises” at all. Lets not forget the carbon tax the Australian people were told we weren’t going to have.. common Pete explain it to us all so we can understand your unbiased opinion or are you just a Labor hypocrite?

    • dovif says:

      10:17am | 29/09/10

      Bateman

      The internet advantage is easy enough

      Faster Porn, Faster pirating, more twitting, more chatting and more time sitting at a computer

      And it will only cost $49 billion, ie $2,000 for each Australian, and then we will pay monthly cost of $100, What is there not to like?

    • PaulB says:

      10:44am | 29/09/10

      But, Climate Change (sorry, Global Warmi…er Global Climate Disruption) IS crap.  When the only permissable debate surrounds how to tax and/or charge the people more to “solve” the problem, then you know what the real agenda is.

    • EX Labor voter 2291 says:

      11:06am | 29/09/10

      I gather that nosthow is other lingo that means , No Intelligence.
      You have a GG, Reading a speech Written by the devious, Lying, devious,nagging,repetitive,nagging,backstabbing,dishonourable,untrustworthy,puppet , giggling gillard. You totally ignore how she has and will WRECK this country sucking up to the greens and independents to survive she is a Dictator governed by the powerbrokers and the above mentioned. PLUS get this nobrainer, the Govenor General is the Mother In Law of one of the main conspiritors- bill shorten which is a Conflict of Interest of which she should ,in all decency Step down from that position it is like a bunch of inbreds is running this country. As for Mr Tony Abbott a wrecker , he has wrecked nothing but being a strong, positive Opposition Leader making that female lying nagger accountable and if he doesnt this country is further down the gurgler and of course you cannot see any of that you richard cranium.

    • bobw says:

      11:08am | 29/09/10

      @PaulB:  Debate about the science is perfectly permissible.  Be sure to actually bring some science though.

      I’d love to know what exactly “the real agenda” is, by the way.

    • Scarneck says:

      11:19am | 29/09/10

      Damocles says @ 08:35am “There is none so blind as he who will not see.” well said…all coalition supporters should take note. In the lower house we currently have three blind mice, namely Abbott, Robb and Hockey. Nosthow made some good points - Tony Crook has as much time for Abbott as most Green voters do, Abbott is the blind master (not Gillard) with statements like “climate change is crap” BTW - nosthow…it’s a troupe of clowns and not a bunch. Cheers

    • Northern Steve says:

      02:29pm | 29/09/10

      Just thought you guys would like to hear that Labor has lost its first vote in the house today.  When they introduced the parliamentary reform, they seem to have gotten some of the words mixed up, and it didn’t come out quite like the document they signed.  I’m sure they weren’t trying to renege on a deal.  It must just be sloppy work. Who’d have guessed!

      Obviously the independents voted against the government on that one.

    • Sam Spade says:

      05:14pm | 29/09/10

      Sure nosthow. It’s looking so good for Julia she lost the first parliament vote!

    • Rohan W says:

      06:34pm | 29/09/10

      nosthow, the Coalition has not dismissed the issue of climate change ignorantly.  I accuse the Gillard government of greenwashing the issue by introducing carbon taxes and these emissions trading schemes.  By introducing measures such as those proposed though these mechanisms, they provide an image of action on a topic that concerns most of Australia, on nothing more than a moral basis.  That’s where the idea for a ‘citizens assembly’ came into things: it was an [failed] attempt to win the approval of the community and foster a culture of action, where the average citizen ends up paying higher taxes anyway.

      Not to say the Coalition has offered a commendable alternative.  The reality is that any drastic action on our part will have consequences on our economy, and will eventually impact our ability to remain competitive in the global market as business moves overseas.  To the LNP’s credit, at least they steer clear of greenwashing the issue, yet they have as yet been unable to out the Government’s flawed logic when it comes to this complex issue.  Abbott isn’t a wrecker, Julia is just a better bullshitter.

      Let’s face it: our Priuses still emit carbon and it takes energy and oil to build a wind turbine.  The way we live our lives will always impact the environment.  But, you can at least limit that.  Put a bloody 5th-generation nuclear reactor in my backyard: I’ll be responsible for it if it gets blown up.  I’d rather one of them than a clean-coal fired plant any day.

    • Was hoping says:

      07:00am | 29/09/10

      I was hoping that the GG was goin to announce a national Budgie Smugglers day for all politicans.

    • Rosie says:

      07:34am | 29/09/10

      Thus the reason it was so biased and boring because it was written by Julia Gillard herself. The only thing of substance was the gloating of the fact that we had 2 females in high office, herself as Governor General and Gillard as PM.

      I said before everything Julia Gillard touches becomes controversial. The best thing about yesterday was the installation of our first indigenous member of the house of representative in his traditional garb. I was so proud and could only imagine how his people would have felt. The member of Hasluck outshone the 2 woman of high office. The comedy was performed by the re-elected speaker, Harry Jenkins and the speech by Tony Abbott that he had always being his friend and never once doubted he should have remained speaker. Christopher Pyne also made me laugh when he mentioned that he had a love hate relationship with the speaker and hoped that this term it would be more love given his way than hate.

    • Joan says:

      09:19am | 29/09/10

      That Gillard wrote the speech explians all. `gloating of the fact that we had 2 females in high office, herself as Governor General and Gillard as PM.` Gloating does not sit well with GGs nature…. GG did not look comfortable reading this speech including this part.  Also there has been no grand celebration amongst women about these 2 women .... neither has connected with women population.

    • David C says:

      10:43am | 29/09/10

      i agree it was great to see the first indigenous member of the House of Reps and also to see our youngest member of parliament. Interesting that for a party that is so out of touch with indigenous issues and out of touch with young people these two reps are from the Liberal party?

    • Old Clive says:

      07:41am | 29/09/10

      The finish line.“So help me GOD.”

    • Steve Thompson says:

      07:45am | 29/09/10

      I watched the GG’s speech opening parliament. I realise that this speech is written by the Prime Minister but I’m astounded that the impartial representative of the Queen should make such a political statement on behalf of one party. It sounds very much like an election campaign speech.

    • Yap Yap says:

      08:08am | 29/09/10

      Translation:
      “I’ve never bothered to listen to any Parliamentary opening speech before.”

    • bella starkey says:

      09:07am | 29/09/10

      The queen does the same thing in the UK.

    • centurion48 says:

      09:28am | 29/09/10

      @Steve Thompson: Well you should also listen to the Queen open the British parliament because the British Prime Minister writes that one. That is part of the Westminster tradition. Kevin Rudd, John Howard and all the previous PMs did it too, as do the premiers for state governors.
      @Yap Yap: nice comment.

    • Philip Crowley says:

      07:51am | 29/09/10

      Love your work Leo smile You’ve got a more realistic grip on things than anyone in government IMHO!!

    • Joe Logan says:

      08:03am | 29/09/10

      Dear me!  I could not go to sleep as I as just checking out how ridiculous it could get.
      “We should be inspired that two women lead our country”  -so, you are a leader , Quentin?
      Julia Gillard is our PM   -you are not!!  -and surely that is a sexist remark?
      Imagine our previous G-G saying “we should be inspired that 3 men lead our country, Howard,Costelloe and myself?

      Gillard had proven herself a liar over the carbon tax, and God knows what she will do next.

      Still -a lot voted for her and the Greens, so lets cop what we deserve!!

    • Catching up says:

      09:15am | 29/09/10

      Yes, people can see Ms Gillard as a liar over carbon tax.  They can also see it as Labor correcting a mistake made in dumping previous policies.  The fact is that Labor is not introducing carbon tax.  They are considering it among other options.

    • persephone says:

      09:35am | 29/09/10

      According to monarchists, the GG is our Head of State, and thus is one of our leaders.

      Republicans, however, would argue that the Queen is our Head of State. I believe that she is female.

      So either way, our Head of State is a female and (by definition, look up what ‘Head of State’ means) one of our leaders.

    • The Badger says:

      10:15am | 29/09/10

      Catching up
      Don’t bother pointing out that there is no carbon tax, nor legislation for a carbon tax. The conservative posters here need something - anything to provide distraction from Abbott’s lying and dishonesty.
      Telling porkies is their bread and butter.
      Just look at the unsubstantiated claims they make about the BER or the pink batts.

      They are appear to be using the playbook of someone who was an expert at manipulation

      By means of shrewd lies, unremittingly repeated, it is possible to make people believe that heaven is hell - and hell heaven. The greater the lie, the more readily it will be believed.
      Adolf Hitler

    • RT says:

      11:50am | 29/09/10

      So what if our head of state is a female, be it the GG or the Queen? I have always believed that a female is the best person for a head job

    • Aitch B says:

      12:14pm | 29/09/10

      Hey….. welcome back, Perse!!

      Um…. that is of course if you are the “real” Perse…........

    • persephone says:

      12:20pm | 29/09/10

      Thanks, Aitch. Good to be back (so far).

      As real as I ever was!

    • Nicole says:

      01:32pm | 29/09/10

      Hi Pers

      Where have you been? Everyone has missed you lots and lots.

    • Len says:

      01:45pm | 29/09/10

      That’s gold RT, pure gold… funniest thing I ever read on here… ever.

    • persephone says:

      02:11pm | 29/09/10

      Hi Nicole…didn’t we have a bet going?

      Election work (all voluntary but kept me busy) and then frantically trying to earn enough money to make up for the wages foregone electioneering!

      Damn this putting principles into action stuff…

    • Wombat says:

      03:50pm | 29/09/10

      Persephone

      Are you sure it’s really you? It would be wrong to falsely get our hopes up.You wouldn’t believe what this lot has been up to while you’ve been away.

      I’m sure that you were just being as polite as always. There is no question about who is our head of state. From the DFAT website at:

      http://www.dfat.gov.au/protocol/protocol_guidelines/15.html

      “Australia’s Head of State is the Queen of Australia, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.”

      The GG is QE2’s rep in Australia and so is, of course, one of our leaders.

    • Nicole says:

      04:21pm | 29/09/10

      @pers, yep we did, but Kev didn’t win. I just hope you didn’t knit that cosy. Anyway, it’s good you’re back.

    • AdamC says:

      04:38pm | 29/09/10

      Welcome back, persephone. So, please let us know. Was your long absence (the commencement of which co-incided with Rudd’s knifing) due to you actually being Therese Rein?

      On another note, this debate about who the real ‘head of state’ is seems tiresome and pointless to me. Why is it such a big issue?

    • Wombat says:

      07:00pm | 29/09/10

      AdamC

      It’s only an issue when people get it wrong. As I have just explained, there is no question that QE2 is our head of state.

      There is no debate.

    • persephone says:

      07:59pm | 29/09/10

      Adam
      the Rudd knifing - and I was around for about a week after it - was followed very quickly by a Federal election, which meant I was out there door knocking etc and generally making a nuisance of myself.
      Now I can’t do that out there, I’ve come back to annoy people here.

      Nicole
      one of those broken promise things - I’m absolutely awful when it comes to knitting.

    • AdamC says:

      09:04am | 30/09/10

      So is that a yes or a no, Pers?

    • nosthow says:

      08:07am | 29/09/10

      Happy Birthdayto our Pm Julia Gillard today ! A few special wines tonight at the Lodge Julia ?

    • Rosie says:

      08:47am | 29/09/10

      Yeah many birthday wishes PM. You will need it at the 2nd day of the 43rd parliament!

      I do hope the first bloke will have a romantic candle lit dinner waiting for you at the People’s Home after trying to make everyone happy at work.

    • Damocles says:

      08:50am | 29/09/10

      @ nosthow…......off topic again mate? You are a little stirrer, aren’t you? You little scallywag! Yes, Happy Birthday Dear Dear Julia, drink deeply from the poisoned chalice. Maybe Albanese, the little terrier, can act as your food taster! How’s it going at The Hodge Podge Lodge with your hubby who’s not your hubby? Australian politics can’t live with it, can’t live without it!

    • PaulB says:

      10:51am | 29/09/10

      Maybe Tim the Minder will be there as a cardboard cutout.  Too busy selling apartments for that nice Mr Dadon who organises Mid-East holidays for wavering politicians.

    • GreenGoblin says:

      11:38am | 29/09/10

      hear hear nosthow…Happy 49th birthday Ms Gillard , like a good wine - our PM is improving with age. May God be with you grin

    • Brad Coward says:

      05:54pm | 29/09/10

      Yes, a few special wines followed by a few special whines !

    • TimB says:

      08:08am | 29/09/10

      Good stuff Leo. Although this part might be too close to reality for my taste:

      “..... Bob will ban electricity after 9 pm and require everyone to wear hats fitted with electricity generating windmills. “

      I have visions of a prehistoric version of Bob Brown trying to ban fire. He is then promptly thunked on the head by another caveman with a club.

    • Like Joining Dots says:

      09:04am | 29/09/10

      Thanks a lot TimB, now I can’t get that prehistoric vision out of my head either. Hope you’re happy mate.

    • goldy says:

      09:29am | 29/09/10

      windmills…..windmills??? I’m thinking whirlygigs would be more appropriate lol

    • Claude Balls says:

      02:40pm | 29/09/10

      OK, so if you don’t already have solar electricity and water storage tanks installed then stop wasting your time here and go and get them installed. Those who already have them, can continue idling away their day here.

    • Nicole says:

      08:17am | 29/09/10

      I know you’re trying to be funny Leo, and this piece is funny, but it’s just so true. This new circus is going to be highly entertaining and the best part about it? It’s free. Hooray for Harry Jenkins and Christopher Pyne. I just love those two.

    • The Badger says:

      08:38am | 29/09/10

      Bring on the preferred prime minister polls,
      I want to see Abbott dancing with the single digits.

    • TimB says:

      09:16am | 29/09/10

      Want all you like. Isn’t going to happen. Half of Australia voted for him for a reason.

    • Alfred Deakin says:

      10:09am | 29/09/10

      Actually TimB, less than half - 49.88% to be exact.

    • Bobster says:

      10:30am | 29/09/10

      @ TimB

      Half of Australia voted against him for a reason. See what I did there?

    • TimB says:

      02:24pm | 29/09/10

      *headdesk*

      Are you guys capable of reading?

      Badger reckons he’ll have a single digit approval rating. I’ve countered with the (approximate) election figure of Tony’s support.

      None of your no doubt invaluable thoughts on my response contradict my point in any way.

    • Bobster says:

      04:13pm | 29/09/10

      *Face palm*
      All I did was suggest that Labor’s election result may indicate your assertion that single digit poll results weren’t going to happen might not be built on the most solid foundation.

    • TimB says:

      04:38pm | 29/09/10

      @ Bobster.

      No it doesn’t. Labor’s approx 50% result in no way indicates Tony Abbott’s popularity rating will drop to single digits. It takes an extraordinary leap of logic to make that conclusion.

    • Bobster says:

      08:04pm | 29/09/10

      Given the obvious hyperbole in the initial statement, I don’t think so.

    • TimB says:

      06:36am | 30/09/10

      So when I say Badger’s statement is stupid (seeing as it indicates Tony’s support somehow dropping from a 50% vote during the election to less than 9% in a matter of mere weeks), yet you persist in telling me that I’m wrong by quoting me the completely irrelevant Labor figure.

      Then you come out and claim Badger’s initial statement is hyperbole.

      You are a very confused person.

    • The Badger says:

      08:58am | 30/09/10

      Abbott’s preferred prime minister numbers in July 2010, were 27%

    • TimB says:

      10:21am | 30/09/10

      Nice try Badger. A couple of things wrong with your statement:

      -You may notice that that figure has TWO digits (not one). It’s not even close to a single digit rate.

      -The figure itself is wrong. Dead wrong. I’m looking at the Newspoll result for that period right now. The number is 34%, not 27%. Julia’s rating was at 50%, the rest were uncommitted.

      Looking at the election result it’s easy to see where most of that “uncomitted vote” went.

      The only leader in the last 3 years to make to single figures was Brendan Nelson. You’re crazy if you think that’s going to happen to Abbott by the next poll.

    • jf says:

      12:58pm | 30/09/10

      Badger - you’re a nob. Not because of your politics but because of the juvenile, US Sitcom Style punchline.

      See what I did here?

    • Bobster says:

      02:35pm | 30/09/10

      @ Bobster

      I just don’t need everything to be literal to get the point, TimB.

      “The Badger says:08:38am | 29/09/10

      Bring on the preferred prime minister polls,
      I want to see Abbott dancing with the single digits.”

      Because it’s obviously too hard for you, I’ll translate.

      The Badger (translated): I believe Tony Abbott’s current behaviour will reflect badly in opinion polls.

      TimB(translated): He got half the vote. Impossible, I say!

      Bobster (translated): Labor got half the vote too but that is completely irrelevant to the criticism of Abbott’s post-election tactics.

      Are you starting to understand or do we need pictures?

    • The Badger says:

      04:29pm | 30/09/10

      Bobster

      I have tried to reply to Tim a number of times, but none of them have gotten through. I have provided a link (to a news ltd story) that backed up the 27%.

      Thank you for taking the time explain it to Tim when I was unable to get a comment through.

      PS I don’t think pictures will help understand what I was inferring

    • TimB says:

      07:11pm | 30/09/10

      There was bugger all about post-election tactics in his comment. Or yours. Sorry but I can’t be expected to understand a point that you haven’t made. Perhaps you need to learn to communicate better. Badger definetley does, or else there wouldn’t have been so many blocked responses. 

      *sigh*

      Regardless of which you’re still wrong. The tactics won’t have that much of an impact beyond the faux outrage concocted by the Left. Just look at Iansand’s reaction to Labor’s lost vote yesterday. All the crying about mean ole’ Tony, when it turned out that pairing was in force and Labor lost the vote simply for being crap.

      Tell you what. I’ll be more fair than you deserve. If the next poll comes out with Tony’s preferred PM figure dropping to under say…25% I’ll admit you had some sort of point. If the rate remains above 30% you both admit you miscalled it.

      Deal?

    • Bobster says:

      12:37pm | 01/10/10

      @ TimB

      Given the entire discussion is about Abbott’s post-election tactics I didn’t think it was necessary to re-itterate it in every sentence.

      We don’t need to put a number on it at all - if Abbott’s preferred PM or Liberal polling figs drop in the near future then there’ll be sufficient reason to suspect the spoiling tactic has backfired.

      If the polls stay roughly steady then Abbott’s tactics are going Ok, if they rise for the Libs then they’re working a treat and if they drop then they need rethinking (lest Turnbull stage a coup).

      In future I’ll do my best to keep the devices simple though so we can avoid this confusion.

      Not everything is literal.

    • Jenny says:

      08:57am | 29/09/10

      It wasn’t just people in the galleries falling asleep. The camera caught a few of the pollies as well, including Tony Abbott, the next time the camera passed him by he was taking notes.

    • C1 says:

      09:11am | 29/09/10

      Why couldn’t the GG write her own speech - she is a eminently qualified woman with a strong legal background. You would think she could jot a couple of suitable phrases and put her own stamp on the event. Most lawyers I know are able to talk underwater (despite the fact I am holding them under for ages).
      It just seems that she is not as inspiring an individual as I thought (despite her background).

    • iansand says:

      09:40am | 29/09/10

      The Head of State never wtites the speech.  Even Missis Kwin says what she is told to say.

    • persephone says:

      09:42am | 29/09/10

      Why doesn’t the Queen?

      We largely inherited the Westminster traditions - that’s why we have quaint little cermonial flourishes like the Usher of the Black Rod (or whatever) and the Speaker being dragged to the chair, members putting pieces of paper on their heads to be heard, etc.

      One of them is the convention that the government is ‘Her Majesty’s’ and is thus carrying out HM’s agenda.

      Thus the Queen in the UK and the GG in Australia read the speech supplied to them which outlines what the government intends to do.

      If they did add to the speech, they would have to be very careful that their additions were meaningless flourishes, because it’s not their job to set the direction for the nation.

      It’s been happening for centuries in the UK and since 1901 in Australia, so it’s scarcely a new phenomena dreamt up by the Gillard government.

    • Bobster says:

      10:59am | 29/09/10

      @ persephone

      Everything that happens under a Labor Government is a socialist conspiracy and a complete bastardisation of our traditions, conventions and constitution, dreamt up because they have no right to govern, ever.

      Even when Labor wins an election it’s clearly because they cheated.

      Haven’t you been paying attention to the online commentary since 2007? This is pretty elementary stuff.

    • Kevin says:

      09:23am | 29/09/10

      Did the Kevin Rudd’s messenger girl ask the Coalition to be nice to her little son-in law?

    • MarK says:

      09:40am | 29/09/10

      Bring on the preferred PM polls.

      I want to see the usual voting intention that shows the incumbent PM with a large lead over the oppositon leader.

      This will again prove to me that preferred PM polls are really really useful straight up after an election.

    • Sven Gali says:

      10:33pm | 29/09/10

      How many more do you need to see, MarK ? You do realise that Abbott has never even come close to Gillard in a single one, don’t you ?

    • acker says:

      11:02am | 29/09/10

      Solution to “Offshore boat arrival processing” “Defence procurement” “Jobs for over 50yo’s” .....we buy the USS Nimitz off the Americans and turn it into a combination ..Detentention Processing Centre - -> Aircraft Carrier staffed by old Sailors and Pilots smile

    • Scarneck says:

      01:11pm | 29/09/10

      No acker, A cheaper solution would be Tasmania…I’m serious. There are three ways to leave Tasmania…Fly, Ferry or swim. Old Sailors and Pilots can still apply.

    • nosthow says:

      11:52am | 29/09/10

      I thought the GG’s speech was lovely Leo as were the other speakers who congratulated Harry Jenkins on his election to the Speaker position. The day was spoilt a bit by the new Aboriginal Liberal member from WA wearing a skin made of slaughtered animals in Parliament. My advice to Kenny is that if he wants to be listened to he had better stop grandstanding in furry outfits. Lets see if Ken has anything remotely relevant to say other than “ohhhh look at me I am an Aborigine” !  Just a small but relevant point.

    • Northern Steve says:

      02:37pm | 29/09/10

      Way to go nosthow.  Trivialise an incredibly important point of Australian history - the first Aboriginal person in The House of Reps is something to be celebrated.  Its hardly grandstanding if he wishes to have his heritage recognised in his clothing.

    • TC says:

      03:01pm | 29/09/10

      You mean like “Oh isnt it wonderful we have females in the top jobs”?

    • Ryan says:

      04:42pm | 29/09/10

      @nosthow: you have a problem with having an Aboriginal member of parliament then?

    • nosthow says:

      06:51pm | 29/09/10

      @Ryan - i have no problem with anybody of any race/religion being in Parliament Ryan as long as they dont parade around like Wyatt is dressed in a robe made from slaughtered animals. if I appeared in Parliament dressed like that I would be howled down. Kenny can show us in the future if hes all feathers and no bird or vice versa but in the meantime suggest he loses the garb !

    • Democrat says:

      12:44pm | 29/09/10

      Spot on Leo.  How boring.  The trappings of an outdated monarchical system that has no relevance whatever in 21st century Australia.  The representative of an absent, foreign Head of State mouthing somebody else’s words.  Why wouldn’t people go to sleep?  Although Abbott probably didn’t get much sleep last night having lost his first major vote in the Parliament 78 to 71 - when we are continuously told the vote is, at best, 74 75.  Bearing in mind that when both the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker are absent from the House and the Assistant to the deputy is in the Chair the vote will be 75 to 72 - Labor down 1 vote and the coalition down 2 (Slipper and Scott).  Not looking good.  The PM has outmanouvered Dr No at every turn since the election.  The troops will be getting restless Tony.

    • raymondh says:

      01:01pm | 29/09/10

      could someone please tell me why tony abbott left the church was he given the oppertunity to leave or ??????

    • iansand says:

      01:18pm | 29/09/10

      Abbott was a seminarian.  He was never ordained or anointed or whatever happens to them.  A bit too much of the St Augustines, I think.  God make me pure but not yet.

    • Aitch B says:

      01:39pm | 29/09/10

      As I understand it he left the seminary voluntarily, raymondh. Why do you ask?

    • Your name: darcy says:

      07:50pm | 29/09/10

      Your comment: Raymondh, firstly oppertunity is spelt opportunity. Dont quite get where your coming from - For your edification, he wasnt asked to leave the seminary, it was a personal decision - Further, he is a Rhodes scholar and gained his MA in Politics and Philosophy at Oxford, this is in addition to his Bachelor of Economics (BEc) and a Bachelor of Laws (LLB) from the University of Sydney. He is certainly no clown

    • Drew says:

      04:14pm | 29/09/10

      Come on Leo, don’t tell me even you were stupid enough to fall for the opposition propaganda on the NBN cost to taxpayers. How much of the NBN is private investment again?

    • Alan says:

      10:17am | 02/10/10

      What the GG really should have said:- “I don’t know what my job description is and can see no need for my job to exist, therefore I resign in order to let Australians elect their Head of State”

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter