I was born in 1969, about two months after Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. My whole life, the moon exploration file has sat in the outbox of humanity’s To-Do list.

Our footprint is even deeper on earth. Pic: AP

My generation, and those brilliant if cocky Gen Ys and Zs who’ve followed, have all grown up in a world where we believe anything is possible, and not just because of all those sneakers ads. The theme of the JFK-inspired lunar program, as evidenced by those famous Armstrong words upon touching the lunar surface, was all about a giant leap for mankind.

In truth, NASA’s lunar conquest was more about asserting American superiority in a world then divided by an invisible iron curtain, than it was about the potential of the human race as a whole. All the same, the latter message lives on today. We can do anything. All of us. America’s moon landing was everyone’s moon landing, and for that, we have Armstrong to thank.

Most Americans are chest-beaters. Armstrong, by all accounts, was a measured sort of character who recognised his place in history without big-noting his contribution. He is remembered for a single step. In truth, his immense skill as a pilot, edging the lunar module down to the rocky lunar surface with less than a minute’s fuel remaining, was his most notable contribution to the mission.

For all this and more, Neil Armstrong was a hero. Pfft to that wheeled iPad buzzing around Mars at the moment. Armstrong’s Apollo 11 mission looked like it was held together with sticky tape and tinfoil by comparison, but it was manned. A conquest is not a conquest unless human beings are involved, and uniquely in human history, Armstrong claimed new territory without hurting anyone else in the process.

They don’t make big names like Neil Armstrong anymore. In one of the greatest ironies of the so-called Global Village, it is almost impossible in today’s fragmented, information-overloaded world for one name in any field to stand above all others. If Jesus came along today, he’d be totally ignored or become the leader of a fringe cult at best.

Armstrong’s name will live forever. Who else from recent history could you say that about? Maybe Michael Jackson, who didn’t mind a spot of moonwalking himself. And maybe a supervillain like Osama bin Laden, whose only faint connection to the other two is that he was a lunatic.

The question now, as Armstrong passes and is laid to rest, is what is left to conquer? What, now, is really worth achieving if the space message and the sneaker ads are right, and anything is indeed possible?

The farthest reaches and indeed all but the nearest reaches of space are still totally out of question for human exploration. There’s not much left to explore in the physical realm on earth either, which is why today’s explorers are increasingly sounding like Guinness Book of Records aspirants with their treks from one pole to the other with only a parakeet for company and a bag of peanuts for sustenance.

So what next?

Here’s a clue. The greatest recent scientific discovery involved infinitesimally small particles. In a similar vein, the world’s most creative minds are shaping our lives with every-shrinking shreds of silicon.

That’s not to say that science and gadgets are the answer to everything. It’s an analogy to point out that we need to look inwards, rather than outwards, to mine the potential of humankind. Stuff the solar system, let’s save the world.

As many people pointed out on the weekend, people have been saying for years “we can put a man on the moon, so surely we can do X or Y…”

Without going all weepy, it’d be great if that sentence ended with people saying surely we can be better custodians of our own planet. That’s not to push a climate change barrow or any other barrow. It’s just to say that serious environmental custodianship will give us all a better long term chance than the schmickest space ship.

Neil Armstrong in his latter years was critical of the lack of big thinking of the American space program. Without totally dismissing his concerns, the world has bigger issues now, a fact reflected in popular science fiction.

Pop sci-fi has long held a mirror to our own pop culture. The early episodes of Star Trek, around the time of Armstrong’s moon mission, mimicked the dialogue and hypocrisy of the Cold War.

The world’s most recent interstellar sci-fi hit, Avatar, was all about a race trying to maintain the resources required for survival on its fragile, threatened planet. That’s what the sad passing of Armstrong has made me think about this Monday. You?

Twitter: @antsharwood

Comments on this post will close at 8pm Australian Eastern Standard Lunar Time

Most commented

85 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Elphaba says:

      12:31pm | 27/08/12

      Once Armstrong’s death went all over Facebook (as these things do), did anyone else have an influx of crazies insisting the moon landing wasn’t real?

      They’re an endless source of entertainment.  My favourite is ‘If we went to the moon, why don’t we go back now, with today’s technology?”

      Erm, because spaceflight is expensive, and there’s not a whole lot else we can glean from the moon because… and this is important… we went there already.

      Ahh, the voyages to Mars will be manned eventually.  Give it time.  Give it time. smile

    • Arnold Layne says:

      12:49pm | 27/08/12

      According to Aaron Sorkin (WIll’s monologue from Ep 1 of Newsroom), here’s why it isn’t happening anymore.

      “It sure used to be.  We stood up for what was right.  We fought for moral reason.  We passed laws, struck down laws, for moral reason.  We waged wars on poverty, not on poor people.  We sacrificed, we cared about our neighbors, we put our money where our mouths were and we never beat our chest.  We built great, big things, made ungodly technological advances, explored the universe, cured diseases and we cultivated the world’s greatest artists AND the world’s greatest economy.  We reached for the stars, acted like men.  We aspired to intelligence, we didn’t belittle it.  It didn’t make us feel inferior.  We didn’t identify ourselves by who we voted for in the last election and we didn’t scare so easy.  We were able to be all these things and do all these things because we were informed…by great men, men who were revered.  First step in solving any problem is recognizing there is one.  America is not the greatest country in the world anymore. “

    • Tubesteak says:

      12:53pm | 27/08/12

      “Once Armstrong’s death went all over Facebook (as these things do), did anyone else have an influx of crazies insisting the moon landing wasn’t real?”

      Actually, I didn’t see a lot of posts about Armstrong in my news feed from friends. Thankfully, I didn’t see any loonies claiming it never happened, either. Although, I am rather selective when it comes to friends and most people figure out pretty quickly, that if you say something stupid in my presence then get ready for a barrage of abuse and evidence about you being wrong. On facebook, or real life, there is no-one to moderate me wink

    • Alicia says:

      01:23pm | 27/08/12

      I don’t have a solid opinion either way on the moon landing but I never actually thought about the cost and ‘we’ve been there already’ as the reason to why they haven’t gone back yet. Simple enough, really.

      I wouldn’t pay millions (billions?) to go somewhere pretty boring if I’ve been there before either and it had nothing new to offer.

      (or perhaps they aren’t going back because of the transformers)

    • Elphaba says:

      01:24pm | 27/08/12

      @Arnold Layne, how amazing is that show?

      @Tubesteak, it wasn’t specifically friends, more like posts from pages I follow, who posted about Armstrong, and then the ensuing comments.  It was amusing Sunday arvo reading!

    • Little Joe says:

      01:26pm | 27/08/12

      @ Tubespeak

      I am quite certain that they landed on the moon ..... but I do not think that all the photography was taken on the moon.

      Does anyone remember seeing the lunar landing craft blasting off the surface of the moon and the camera following the rapidly ascending craft?? I wonder who was left behind holding the camera???

      In todays CM they have published, probably unknowingly, one of the more notorius pictures showing the fluttering flag.

    • John F says:

      01:41pm | 27/08/12

      @ Little Joe, the camera was operated remotly from earth, the operator had to factor in the time lag so he could follow the assent. He was a very nervous man that day.

    • Little Joe says:

      02:08pm | 27/08/12

      @ John F

      If that is true ..... that is truly amazing. If born today he would have been a X-Box Champion

    • Rickster says:

      02:58pm | 27/08/12

      Arnold we know all about your stange hobby….“Man has invented his doom first step was touching the moon” Bob Dylan

    • Lisa Meredith says:

      03:18pm | 27/08/12

      Dear Little Joe,

      Imagine a flag hanging in a box. Actually, imagine two identical boxes, each with its own flag hanging inside. Each flag is remotely mechanically agitated in exactly the same way and timed to see how long each one takes to stop moving. 

      Test 1- One box contains air at sea level pressure; the other contains a vacuum consistent with atmospheric pressure on the moon. Assuming gravity is the same for each box, which flag will be the first to stop moving? Answer: the box with the sea level pressure. Air pressure provides resistance to the movement of the flag and it slows down and stops sooner.

      Test 2 – One box experiences gravity as at the surface of the earth; the other as at the surface of the moon. Assuming air pressure is the same for each box, which flag will be the first to stop moving? Answer: the box with earth’s gravity. The greater the gravity, the more resistance it provides to the movement of the flag.

      Prediction: based on the results above, one can predict that in the absence of any wind, the flag erected on earth will come to a standstill sooner than the flag on the moon.

    • Little Joe says:

      06:56pm | 27/08/12

      Yes Lisa Meredith,

      Your boring explanation of physics is great but does explain increases in kinetic energy that I have seen on some footage.

    • M says:

      12:31pm | 27/08/12

      Avatar was a remake of fern gully.

    • L. says:

      01:21pm | 27/08/12

      “Avatar was a remake of fern gully”

      Ah, finally..someone else who see’s it.

      Agreed, Avatar = Fern Gully remade with a $250,000,000 budget.

    • St. Michael says:

      01:21pm | 27/08/12

      More like Dances With Wolves.

    • Inky says:

      01:45pm | 27/08/12

      It really was more Dances With Wolves and Poccahontus than it was Fern Gully.

      Plus, it didn’t have ANY Tim Curry at all. Everytime my housemate’s wizard casts the spell “Acid Rain”, he has to put up with me singing Toxic Love

    • Nathan Explosion says:

      02:01pm | 27/08/12

      I had such a crush on that black haired fairy girl.

    • Rickster says:

      04:40pm | 27/08/12

      @ Nathan it might have been a black haired fairy…...but what makes you think it was a girl?

    • Little Joe says:

      06:58pm | 27/08/12

      Rickster,

      Stop spoiling this person’s fantasy with an animated character.

      Some people wouldn’t care if the black-haired fairy was a boy or a girl!!!

    • John Findlay says:

      12:34pm | 27/08/12

      Mans greatest vision was brought to us by John F Kennedy
      Mans greatest achievment was made by NASA
      At the top of this pyramid the man who represented this incredible achievment was Neil Armstrong.
      History will make him the most famous human of all time, in 1000, 2000 years time his name will still be known when many others are forgotten.
      RIP Neil Armstrong

    • M says:

      12:54pm | 27/08/12

      And it will be seen as the zenith of the American empire and the beginning of the end for the American dream.

    • Elphaba says:

      01:38pm | 27/08/12

      @John Findlay, that’s been on pay TV, a few times.  It’s an excellent series.

    • John Findlay says:

      02:29pm | 27/08/12

      Ron Howard and Tom Hanks were both complete space nutters (like me) before they did Apollo 13. NASA gave them complete and free reign over the equipment left over from the Apollo missions. In the series from the Earth to the Moon most of the equipment and dialoge is the real thing. Very few things were re-constructs right down to the tool they used to close the Capsule hatch. I think that as far as TV series go this is perhaps the greatest because it’s a virtual reference of what actualy happened, from why Kennedy decided to go to the moon with only 15 min of US space travel completed, to the final moon landing (Apollo 17)
      By the way Anthony, they had less than 10 sec of fuel remaining because Armstronge had to steer around a crater.
      @ Elphaba, it’s way past time it was shown on free to air, it may educate all the fruit loops who still think it was staged.

    • Elphaba says:

      02:39pm | 27/08/12

      @John, you can’t make the ‘nutters’ watch it, unfortunately…

    • Stan says:

      12:38pm | 27/08/12

      “an invisible iron curtain” - not!
      It was a very real and intimidating concrete and steel barrier across Europe. There were armed guards, land mines and attack dogs imprisoning the people of Eastern Euriope lest they flee to the free societies beyond the prison of their socialist nirvana.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      01:07pm | 27/08/12

      Fair point and I was aware of that, but unless I’m very much mistaken, the term became used to represent the cultural divide between east and West too

    • L. says:

      01:26pm | 27/08/12

      “Fair point and I was aware of that, but unless I’m very much mistaken, the term became used to represent the cultural divide between east and West too”

      yep, just liek the ‘Bamboo’ curtain ‘surrounding’ China.

    • iMitchy says:

      01:02pm | 27/08/12

      It’s been a rough week for the Armstrongs.

    • Blind Freddy says:

      02:58pm | 27/08/12

      Agreed. Though not as rough as the one previous for people named Robert Hughes.

    • iMitchy says:

      03:39pm | 27/08/12

      Ha! Well done.

    • J-Zee says:

      01:02pm | 27/08/12

      Stuff the solar system? Look Ant, I think that you should probably go listen to, watch or read something by Neil deGrasse Tyson about Space Exploration.

      iPads, the LHC (which is awesome by the by) are all good and well, but nothing inspires and gives hope to humanity so much as Space.

      You asked “What’s next?”, the answer is putting a human on the dusty red planet of Mars.

    • Rickster says:

      02:01pm | 27/08/12

      Nothing inspires like space, why? because we like to think that once we f@rk this planet up we can move on to the next one.

    • JC says:

      01:12pm | 27/08/12

      “Armstrong’s name will live forever. Who else from recent history could you say that about?”
      Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, John Lennon, Mahatma Ghandi, Charles Manson, Queen Elizabeth II, Buzz Aldrin, Chuck Yeager and Bon Scott.

    • St. Michael says:

      01:22pm | 27/08/12

      Don’t forget Richard Nixon.  His name is on that plaque on the Moon commemorating the landing.

    • harry says:

      01:22pm | 27/08/12

      Warnie.

    • Dan says:

      01:45pm | 27/08/12

      I reckon all of those names will be forgotten long before Neil Armstrong

    • Kika says:

      01:48pm | 27/08/12

      Chuck Norris

    • Little Joe says:

      01:51pm | 27/08/12

      Premier Shelf - Martin Luther King

      “Let us not wallow in the valley of despair, I say to you today, my friends.

      And so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

      I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.”

      I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

      I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

      I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

      I have a dream today!”

      Top Shelf

      Albert Eistein, Nelson Mandela, Bob Dillon, Aretha Franklin, Mother Teresa, Steven Speilberg, Winston Churchill, Malcom X

      2nd Tier

      Bill Gates, Elvis Presley, Steve Jobs, Pope JP II, Sigmund Freud, Billy Halliday, Piccaso, Marylin Monroe, Muhamad Ali.

    • Scotchfinger says:

      03:36pm | 27/08/12

      Chuck Who?
      Sounds like the name of a Texas Ranger or somethin’ wink

    • John F says:

      05:49pm | 27/08/12

      none of those names will be remembered in a 1000 years, Neil Armstrong will be because we will ultimatly continue to explore space.
      We know Chuck Yeager is famous for breaking the sound barrier but do you know who the first man to go Mach 2 was ? Just like the first human to walk on Mars still wont be as well known as Neil

    • Little Joe says:

      07:02pm | 27/08/12

      @ Scotchfinger

      Chuck Norris is comin’ ova ta punch ya in da back of ya face!!!

      Just remember people are afraid of the dark ..... the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris!!!

    • HC says:

      01:17pm | 27/08/12

      The reason why we won’t continue to reach for the stars or be better custodians of our own planet or any other grand vision is because 99.99999% of the population are sheep (stupid ones at that) and self-interest rules the rest.

      We’re also crippled by fear, especially the fear of failure, intelligence is scorned and ridiculed, imagination is crushed as soon as humanly possible by an education system that denies success and the entire concept of short-term sacrifice to ensure long-term gain is met with derision.

      And don’t even get me started on the state of politics or economics in the world, the whole thing is too stupid for words.

    • Al says:

      01:23pm | 27/08/12

      “Armstrong’s name will live forever.”
      Yes, I can see it now being taught:
      Lance Armstrong - the first man on the moon and also had a proffessional cycling career untill he retired and was continualy accused of cheating with only circumstancial evidence.
      Wouldn’t be the first time the actions of one person are attributed to another in the history books.

    • Little Joe says:

      07:05pm | 27/08/12

      I thought it was Louis Armstrong!!!

    • Chris says:

      01:28pm | 27/08/12

      It’s almost impossible to justify the cost of sending a manned mission to Mars. The moon is a stone’s throw by comparison (only 384,000 km), compared with the minimum of 54,000,000 km for Mars.
      Mars, at its closest, is 140 TIMES THE DISTANCE OF THE MOON. It hasn’t been that close in recorded history. Forget it. There’s no way humans will spend the years travelling there and back, at such extreme risk, at such extreme cost. Think of it. It will cost trillions of dollars and years out of people’s lives. It would be the largest undertaking in human history, and for what? To say we’d been there?

    • PW says:

      01:52pm | 27/08/12

      Mars came within 56 million km of Earth in 2003.

    • HC says:

      02:02pm | 27/08/12

      What’s wrong with spending all that money just to say we’d been there?  It’s just money anyway.  No imagination and no ambition all for what?  The fear of failure and the fear of spending a few bucks?  The space race in the 60’s drove a technology renaissance we’re still profiting from half a century later, imagine (if possible) what might change in the long-term on our planet if we aim even higher.

      Your comment is exactly what’s wrong with the human race today.

    • Dan says:

      02:11pm | 27/08/12

      It took 8 months to get a 1 tonne rover to Mars, what makes you think we couldn’t do the same with a manned mission?

      The point of landing on Mars could be to terraform the planet. -50 degrees is a bit uncomfortable but with a few structures, its also liveable. The red dust on Mars indicates huge quantities of iron ore - turn this into steel and you can build structures, turn the sand into glass and you’ve got greenhouses. The only thing we’re not sure is there is water, but it looks like there is plenty somewhere.

      “What do you mean you’ve never been to Alpha Centauri? Oh, for heaven’s sake, mankind, it’s only four light years away, you know. I’m sorry, but if you can’t be bothered to take an interest in local affairs, that’s your own lookout. Energize the demolition beam. I don’t know, apathetic bloody planet, I’ve no sympathy at all.”

    • Rickster says:

      03:03pm | 27/08/12

      @Dan we’re not even there yet and you talking about the greenhouse effect on Mars, yes there is water there, Mars has polar ice caps.

    • Rickster says:

      03:12pm | 27/08/12

      @HC but you’ve got to ask yourself what drove the space race? Fear of atomic war and world domination thats what. I’ve got no problem spending money as long as it’s someone else’s money but how about fixing the problems on this world first? I know….boring!

    • Queensland Observer says:

      03:43pm | 27/08/12

      “What do you mean you’ve never been to Alpha Centauri? Oh, for heaven’s sake, mankind, it’s only four light years away, you know. I’m sorry, but if you can’t be bothered to take an interest in local affairs, that’s your own lookout. Energize the demolition beam. I don’t know, apathetic bloody planet, I’ve no sympathy at all.”

      As usual Douglas Adams hits the point fair and square.

    • Admiral Ackbar says:

      04:32pm | 27/08/12

      “It’s almost impossible to justify the cost of sending a manned mission to Mars.”

      Not at all. I strongly believe, without any trace of sarcasm, that the exploration of space is the single most important thing human kind could be doing with its money and resources.

    • Little Joe says:

      07:18pm | 27/08/12

      @ Dan

      We would have to send a nuclear reactor in the primary mission as there is no suitable energy source on Mars.

      Follow up missions would incorporate aerogel manufacturing equipment and glass panels.

      Hopefully there is plenty of subterranean water sources.

      The entire project would need to have an extreme conservation ..... remember hydrogen will escape Mars gravitation and we don’t want to be shipping hydrogen from Earth every trip.

      Would love to be part of the project!!!

    • Chris says:

      07:21pm | 27/08/12

      @PW: Yes, but its closest is about 54 million km, and it hasn’t been that close in recorded history.
      Some of the others: so, you seriously think that such an undertaking is going to be possible and worthwhile. Okay, that about says it all. Humanity has a fine history of exploration, but it was nearly always exploration in the pursuit of something useful (land, resources, populations to exploit). Answer this: Why has there been no manned mission to the moon for 40 years, when there is still an entire moon to explore? The reason is simply that there is no point. As we study more and more a barren Martian landscape, we might realise, gradually, that the enormous cost and danger are just not worth it. Were it an inhabitable planet, it would be much different. Even if vast resources were found, how would we get them back to earth?  It’s 7 months each way at the best of times, in small craft. You obviously envisage vast iron ore carriers in space which would need to be manned, and huge crews living on Mars in an airless environment, digging up the stuff to send home, or some such scenario. Ridiculous. Just ridiculous. I could go on, but nothing changes the mind of a dreamer until another dream comes along.

    • Gordon says:

      01:30pm | 27/08/12

      Good article Anthony. They did all that in 8 years. We take longer to argue the where/when/if/who-pays about building a simple bridge, dam, tunnel or railway. They weren’t afraid of making a mistake: some astronauts were killed in the early days. They learned from it and pressed on. Are we capable of doing that or are we too precious and risk averse?

    • taxed citizen says:

      01:54pm | 27/08/12

      Such a footprint is impossible on the moon. There is no moisture there.

    • Rickster says:

      02:04pm | 27/08/12

      taxed citizen is right .........taxed for brain cells.

    • jhamiltonwa says:

      02:21pm | 27/08/12

      Not to menrton falling arches

    • Dan says:

      02:29pm | 27/08/12

      If that was true, then why are there craters, mountains, other structures on the moon. If water was necessary to leave an inprint wouldn’t the whole planet be spherical?

    • Bill says:

      02:35pm | 27/08/12

      There’s no air between the particles, beside which the material up there is very different to material here, that is constantly being weathered.

    • Rickster says:

      01:56pm | 27/08/12

      I told the missus about the photo’s they took of the landing site from Hubbel, she commented that it proved they went to the moon, I said yeh but it’s amazing what you can do with Photo Shop.

    • taxed citizen says:

      02:18pm | 27/08/12

      @Rickster : it is Hubble , not Hubbel o brainy one .Check with your missus..

    • Rickster says:

      02:37pm | 27/08/12

      thanks for the tip taxed maybe you could live in my puter and be my spell check but I supose it’s along way from Uranus where you live now.

    • wille says:

      02:11pm | 27/08/12

      If the Americans had any vision Newt Gingrich would be the republican candidate and we might have a moon base and flights to mars withing 8 years.

      I could live without abortions if it meant a chance of living on the moon

    • Rickster says:

      02:54pm | 27/08/12

      If they had any vision they would send him to the moon with a oneway ticket and maybe you could go along for the ride as well.

    • Audra Blue says:

      04:27pm | 27/08/12

      “I could live without abortions if it meant a chance of living on the moon”

      Only a right wing religious freak could say something so monumentally stupid like that.

      Well done, go to the back of the short bus.  Don’t forget your football helmet.

    • Muppet says:

      02:22pm | 27/08/12

      Bring back space food sticks!

    • millane says:

      02:30pm | 27/08/12

      surprised you havent tried to link the story to how small and insignificant

      a. the AFL is (especially when compared to the so called greatest game of all)
      b. the state of Victoria is

      it does appear to be your usual MO

    • Little Joe says:

      02:50pm | 27/08/12

      It will be extremely impressive when NASA lands a luna module on the MCG

    • Admiral Ackbar says:

      04:36pm | 27/08/12

      I think it goes without saying that AFL is insignificant.

    • Ret says:

      02:33pm | 27/08/12

      If he landed the Eagle with “less than a minute’s fuel left”, how did they take off? Some find of fuel cells they could recharge?
      Good to see Chuck Yeager mentioned earlier. I met him in the 1990’s with his much younger wife who was a bit prone to seasickness. “Missy here threw up all her cookies”-hell of a character. Didn’t rate Armstrong as a test pilot though.

    • Eskimo says:

      02:43pm | 27/08/12

      There were two separate engines. The engine used for landing was different to the engine used for take off.

    • M says:

      02:44pm | 27/08/12

      There was fuel allocated for landing and fuel allocated for taking off again. They were down to 30 seconds worth of landing fuel. If that ran out it was either abandon mission or hope the lunar module wasn’t damaged by the moons low gravity when it crash landed into the surface.

      Armstrong veritably had testicles the size of assteroids.

    • Rickster says:

      02:45pm | 27/08/12

      Yes they found some more fuel cells unlike those who struggle to find brain cells…...the lander had different engines to land and a seperate engine to take off and get back into orbit.You see this is why some people think Abbott would make a good PM. Total ignorance.

    • John F says:

      02:49pm | 27/08/12

      @ Ret, the LEM was 2 space craft in one, the decent stage and the assent stage. Ever notice that they left the bottom bit behind.
      p.s. there was less than 10 sec of fuel left for landing NOT 60 sec.

    • colin says:

      02:54pm | 27/08/12

      @Ret 02:33pm | 27/08/12

      “If he landed the Eagle with “less than a minute’s fuel left”, how did they take off? Some find of fuel cells they could recharge?”

      Seriously?

      You had enough interest in spaceflight/aircraft to meet Chuck Yeager, but you don’t know how the ascent stage powered by its own fuel and rocket detached from the descent stage to go back to the command module..?

    • Ret says:

      04:59pm | 27/08/12

      Hey, I was just asking-thanks for the answer. (John F, M and Eskimo) Also if I want to know answers, than should indicate that I’m not ignorant enough to “think Abbott would make a good Prime Minister”.(defamation action coming your way shortly Rickster).  And colin, although I am interested in aircraft, (mainly WWII warbirds as it happens) meeting Chuck Yeager was due to living on an island that attracts numerous famous people.

    • Johnno says:

      03:38pm | 27/08/12

      No one has mentioned China.
      They seem to have taken up the baton and it will be interesting to see where they take it.

    • M says:

      03:58pm | 27/08/12

      I just had a flashback to a thai peepshow I saw once.

    • Johnno says:

      04:05pm | 27/08/12

      Thanks, M. I got a giggle out of that.

    • Adam says:

      03:51pm | 27/08/12

      Of course he’ll be best remembered for being the first man to set foot on the moon. Yet the true measure of his character, should be that he dedicated that achievement at the height of the Cold War to all mankind; and following his famous words, placed a patch on the moon’s surface dedicated to those Astronauts and Cosmonauts on both sides of the space race who lost their lives in the pursuit of that accomplishment.

    • Carol says:

      04:04pm | 27/08/12

      With the current propulsion systems rational interplanetary travel is just not on.
      What we have is a gimmick, or should I say sucker bait for the masses.
      There is no way a person will ever go to Mars and return alive.

      The many $millions spent on this and other mass amusements would be better spent on health and education of the people.

    • monkeymind says:

      07:59pm | 27/08/12

      I am sure Cook was told the same thing.

      “When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.”

      when did you get your Phd?

    • Michael R says:

      04:25pm | 27/08/12

      What’s sad is that Armstrong’s passing is a sign that China is overtaking the USA as the global superpower: in space, economics, and military. When the recent female Chinese astronaut when up in space she babbled something about the “motherland” rather than anything about mankind. Who feels safe in a world run by China? What’s sad is that the West is willing to trade its way to global insecurity because of mindless adherence to the god of free trade. The West has lost its mind.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

. @mcguiremi is journo of the year! #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

.@mariamosco @msmarto Super Smarto. And Shirley Stott Despoja into the Hall of Fame #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

Best print journo to @mcguiremi woot! #samediaawards

Anthony Sharwood

The AFL needs a special draw song. Feels weird having no club song at the end of #AFLSwansFreo. But what song?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter