It’s easy to lay the blame of rising food prices at the feet of the large retailers and it also makes for a sexy, albeit misguided, headline. The easy target is often the large target, but if you strip the emotion out of this debate and look at the facts, its clear there isn’t much of a story in it at all.

Yes we have no bananas…we have no bananas today.

It is true food costs more than it did 10 years ago. Like other products and services including education, healthcare, the cost of living increases over time, but so do wages. Australian private sector earnings have risen by nearly 51 per cent since 2000.

Australia’s real growth in wages is the second highest of 10 developed nations. But you won’t see critics talk about this when they talk about food prices. It ruins the hot headline.

The other pertinent fact that critics won’t mention is the amount of competition in grocery and fresh food retailing. There are 30,000 fresh food retailers in this country. Coles and Woolworths are the biggest supermarkets but they are fierce competitors. You need only open your daily newspaper to see how fiercely they compete for your grocery dollar.

Despite the hysteria, Coles and Woolworths do not have a stranglehold over the sector. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission last year found we had a competitive market. Combined these two players have around 60 per cent of the market for packaged groceries. They account only half of all the fresh food sales including vegetables, fruit, meat and bread.

Associate Professor Frank Zumbo argues that the only way to lower prices is to tear down Coles and Woolworths. Any economist will tell you that the best way to increase competition is to reduce barriers to entry for new players, which is what the Government is doing. Competition Minister the Hon Craig Emerson MP has introduced a range of measures to help new players like Aldi and Costco set up shop in Australia.

German retailer Aldi plans to have 700 stores in Australia, putting it on par with Coles and Woolworths. Costco, the big box American retailer opened its doors to Melbourne shoppers in earlier this year, and plans to soon be serving shoppers in Sydney. The larger retailers welcome this new competition. 

Grocery retailing is a high turnover, low margin business, so earnings before interest and tax is pretty modest. The price you pay for a product on the shelf is a reflection of what the retailer has paid to source that product. So the best way supermarkets make their profits is through efficiencies and economies of scale. Their shareholders, including many Australian self funded retirees, wouldn’t expect anything less.

As Commsec Economist Craig James said this week, the number of large businesses that can compete in Australia is limited by the size of our dispersed population. “The small number of major companies in retailing, banking and airlines is a function of our relatively small population.”

What is often lost in this argument is the reasons why Coles and Woolworths are successful food retailing businesses. They give their shoppers what they want and they meet a need. Shoppers are smart. If they don’t think they’re getting a good deal, they’ll vote with their feet.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Most commented

24 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Jeff from Meroo says:

      06:11am | 13/11/09

      Margy how can you justify the fact that we pay more for our groceries than anyone else with the argument that we’ve increased our salaries in the past 10 years? 

      The two things are independent from one another.  Just because I got a pay raise doesn’t justify the cost of groceries increasing as they have.  When I can buy the exact same Australian made products at the same supermarket chain in NZ for 40% less, that shows how much they’re taking advantage of Australians.

      You are right that the cost of everything goes up over time but nothing changes the fact that we Australians pay more for our groceries than anyone else in the world.  I can tell you that it is not the farmers that have jacked up the prices and are making a killing on what they produce, so can you explain why I pay more for a side of lamb at Coles in Sydney then I would in London?  Or why do I pay more for a banana in Brisbane than I do in Japan?

    • Ziggy says:

      06:43am | 13/11/09

      Woolies are the least efficient major food retailer in the world. The only reason they have prospered is the fact that they have only one real competitor and that one is content to play ‘shadow the prices’ - it suits them both. Our market is too small for any major new investor to really bother - although COSTCO is a positive development. I could go on for hours with real facts not theory as I used to run a lot of the show at Woolies before I retired. Plus having been a councillor on the Food Marketing Institute - an international body. No other developed country would allow this degree of monopolisation in all food,liquor and petrol.Between them they control fresh meat,fresh F&V, dairy,liquor,petrol and soon,hardware. Increasing competition? How about applying some logic here!
      Both of them have built in high fixed costs and tremendous executive perks which they will fight tooth and nail to preserve. Why should they reduce prices? They have a comfortable accomodation with each other to preserve their corporate way of life. And Govts who only pay lip service to ‘small business’ - the true ‘engine room’ of any economy.
      The fact that you can buy cheaper in London,Paris,New York etc etc speaks volumes.
      The drivel I’ve seen dished up by academics who support the Woolies line shows they have no idea of the real business world where the best market share is 100%.
      And now they offer less and less choice and more and more packaged, chemicalised and tasteless garbage. Like Westfield, they are reducing everything to the same dreary formula - everything looks the same with less and less diversity, choice and true quality.
      We have the largest body of Corporations legislation in the world and with seemingly less and less protection.
      ‘The Fresh Food People?’ They would not recognise true fresh food if it bit them on their backsides!

    • The duopoly use market power says:

      07:31am | 13/11/09

      Oh Margy, PLEASE do a bit of research instead of sitting behind the desk. Woolworths has FIXED price contracts for supply of fruit and vegies and these are for at minimum 12 months.
      The super premium is obtained by increasing retail prices to reflect market shortages due to growing conditions such as drought. They do not pay an increased cost, they simply use it to justify a price rise at retail level.
      A grower cannot deal with Woolies unless they are large producer or part of a group that takes on a fixed price contract.

    • SM says:

      07:44am | 13/11/09

      The reinforcements have arrived after Kate Carnell’s laughably embarrassing attempt to drum up support for her members (which include Sara Lee, Kraft, Nestle, Bulla Dairy Foods and Sanitarium) the other day.  Ms Osmond fares no better.  Of course, the mebers of the association she represents include Coles, Woolworths and Franklins.

    • Joel B1 says:

      07:55am | 13/11/09

      Stop Aldi!
      This cut-price chain does more to damage competition and diversity than any other factor. Dick Smith Foods can tell you why.

    • BT says:

      08:03am | 13/11/09

      All I know is, when I went to Scotland in 2007 I was shocked at how cheap and TASTY the food was! It was like I had stepped back in time 20 years to the way food used to be served in this country. On a side note - the quality of their clothing is also far superior to the crap we get here - I now get my clothes shipped over from Marks & Spencer because I want something that isn’t going to fall apart after the second wash.

    • Paul says:

      08:21am | 13/11/09

      watch Woolies squirm magicalmullum.com If you are so confident about your prices propaganda why not be transparent and support Grocery Watch instead of squeezing Rudd to backflip on the issue? Doesn’t add up. If real wages have gone up why do families now need two breadwinners rather one 20 years ago to maintain a basic standard of living? Sounds like Ruddspeak to me.

    • John A Neve says:

      08:25am | 13/11/09

      I’ve said it before and I’ll repeat it. The public creates monopolies, if the bulk of the public chooses to shop at “A” to the neglect of “B”.  The result soon becomes obvious.

      “A” gets bigger and bigger and “B” dies, it so simple

    • hoofman says:

      08:36am | 13/11/09

      Joel B1 8:55am: how about YOU tell us why?

    • Colin says:

      08:38am | 13/11/09

      There is another side to this debate.

      Australia has a draconian food import regime, hiding behind quarantine laws to stop cheaper imports. Sometimes these are justified, other times they are not.
      When one shops in the UK it is apparant that the food is sourced from many parts of the world - Spain, Italy, South Africa, Chile and so forth. In Australia, that is not so. Labour to harvest fruit is expensive here, compared to other nations. Mangoes are a case in point as are Avocadoes. We could import these for far less than they are available locally.

    • murray says:

      08:40am | 13/11/09

      @Jeff from Meroo: I presume the argument that it isn’t just your wage that was gone up, it is the wages payed to all those involved in bringing the produce to the shelf.

    • Liz says:

      08:47am | 13/11/09

      You don’t reckon 60% is a stranglehold on the market even if the figure is correct?
      Wages in the private sector went up because of greed not because people were working harder or better.There’s no justification, companies and business just want more and more of the profits.
      You’ll never convince the person in the street they’re getting good value for the increased ammount of money being spent.

    • Steve Smith says:

      08:52am | 13/11/09

      Good article. The sexy misguided headlines are spot on. And from most of the comments already it looks like alot of people have been getting their “facts” from Today Tonight… and that stuff is pretty hard to argue with since they ignore basic economics.

    • RB says:

      09:09am | 13/11/09

      Too funny.  Are you on a retainer or some other payment Margy?

      As for barriers to entry, breaking down the massive consolidated entities known as Coles and Woolworths removes the biggest barrier of all.  Look at their strategy in liquor - they bring in the lower pricepoint shops, drive teh small local retailers out of business based on price then they “magically” put their premium priced stores in the now independent outlet free zone.

    • paul says:

      10:10am | 13/11/09

      What about the small retailers who get knocked out by the big chains Margy - who is standing up for them? Your association?

    • Garry says:

      10:27am | 13/11/09

      Now having some idea of how produce moves from farm to retail I will add this question.

      Why not do some investigation and tell us Margy, how much the farmer gets for his/her say - milk, compared to the middlepeople and the retailers. Would this activity not prove your point? or will it disprove it?

      On how the prices are fixed and any variation in the retail price do not go to farmers? Is this true?

      My understanding is that having woolies and coles the major buyers who set the prices for produces is that a fair trade but that’s where I need impartial opinion, can you assist and produce those figures.

    • Richard says:

      10:39am | 13/11/09

      Here we go again.  As I said in response to Kate Carnell’s apologia, this article deliberately fails to deal with the major issue the recent OECD figures disclosed, ie that food prices have increased in Australia in the last 10 years by a greater margin (about 40%) than any other OECD country, and by a fairly large amount.  As I recall, the next largest was the UK whose prices had gone up about 30%.  How is this to be explained?  It is hard to ignore the biggest issue which separates our market from other OECD countries, ie the dominance of 2 big players.
      Now that is the issue.  All the rest is just obfuscatory waffle.

    • DG says:

      10:41am | 13/11/09

      @Jeff from Meroo (07:11am | 13/11/09)

      Your salary goes up, and so does the salary of the people employed by the retailed to stack shelves, serve at the register. But not only that the cost of staff to the suppliers has increased as well.

      @Paul (09:21am | 13/11/09)
      “If real wages have gone up why do families now need two breadwinners rather one 20 years ago to maintain a basic standard of living?”

      Because a ‘basic standard of living’ 20 years ago was nothing like it is today - it certainly didn’t include multiple TV’s, two cars, pay TV, eating out etc. Perhaps most significantly people didn’t purchase houses that were more than 7 times the average persons salary.

      Now think this through - if you have 2 salaries it increases your purchasing power, so you are able to spend more on a house - offer just a little more than the other purchasers… it take about 4 seconds for people to realise that 2 incomes is more luxurious than one and before you know it everyone is running on a dual income and the advantage is lost, suddenly you need dual incomes just to remain in the market.

    • Ziggy says:

      12:13pm | 13/11/09

      I will add this re small business - they are their own worst enemies in many cases. You go and try and form a decent association to increase their buying power etc. Guaranteed to fail because the small blokes just won’t work together - it’s a question of fierce independence and lack of trust. when I was on the council of the old Retailers Association, the little blokes did’nt even bother to turn up, so no wonder it became the fiefdom of the majors.Yet they will happily buy a succesful Franchise and pay the extra % because that is exactly what a franchisor does. And they lose their independence etc.Go figure.

    • SM says:

      02:00pm | 13/11/09

      Ms Osmond needs to consider her placement of these stories a little better.  As does Ms Carnell, and all other duopoly defending, on the payroll, vested interest owning, direct and/or pertentant question ducking apologists.  Somewhere like the Womens Weekly would work better for them.

    • stephen says:

      12:26am | 14/11/09

      Recently, Coles decided to limit the range of each product. As a consumer, I don’t like it, and from the the point of view as a businessman, I believe it was a

       

       

       

       

       

       


      Recently, Coles decided to limit the range of each product. As a consumer, I don’t like it, and as a business decision, I reckon it was just plain dumb.

    • Greg Locock says:

      11:46am | 14/11/09

      “The larger retailers welcome this new competition.”

      So why do they routinely object to planning permission for supermarkets to be built by their “welcome” competition?

      This is one of the worst articles I have ever read. Who paid for it? Directly or indirectly?

    • Jeff from Meroo says:

      11:58am | 14/11/09

      Murray and DG:  I appreciate that if my salary has increased, that means everyone int the supply chain that provides every service I consume has also had a salary increase.  That said lets take Coles as the example.  what was their profit in 1999 and what is it now?  If this too has increased with my salary then I would agree however in 1999 Coles profit was $300.7 million which would suggest that their profit should be (at 50%) $451.4 million this year.  Look it up yourself but the figure for 2009 after tax profit is $1,535 million..  up 510%!  Now explain to me how that happened when as you say, their employee salary overhead increased by 50% like my salary has over the past 10 years.

    • Michael says:

      11:03am | 15/11/09

      Don’t forget the effect free trade has had on our market, plenty of US produce coming to our shores now days and unlike our farmers they are heavily subsidised. I know of at least one orange farm that doesn’t harvest its oranges any more because they can’t compete with Californian produce, how does it make sense that tons of oranges that have to travel across the world are cheaper then ones grown here?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Found a TV meteorologist on Twitter with the last name Piotrowski. There's a whole newsroom of Piotrowskis out there

Paul Colgan

RT @businessinsider: Man Being Questioned For Boston Bombing Connection Shot And Killed By FBI by @paulszoldrahttp://t.co/OtypP2PRgI

Daniel Piotrowski

This is a must read @TheAtlantic. Whether you think you know everything or think you know nothing http://t.co/naoUutCoWF

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JoshuaWithers: Have you seen the Australian version of Breaking bad? He get's cancer and Medicare covers his costs and the series ends.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter