Sorry Sarah Palin – in the war on the “r” word, you can’t have it both ways.

The foxy Fox News contributor and former 1.3-term Governor of Alaska kicked off a skirmish earlier this month when she called on the president to sack his Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, for using the word “retarded” during a strategy meeting.

Political opportunist or great linguistic reformer?

According to the Wall Street Journal, Emanuel, a famously aggressive pit-bull among Obama’s inner circle, called some at the meeting last August “F-ing retarded” for saying they were going to air ads attacking conservative Democrats who weren’t supporting the president’s health care plan.

In a typically folksy post to her Facebook page, which has 1.4 million fans (frightening, but less than Obama’s 7.6 million), Palin responded to a “patriot” from Massachusetts who alerted her to the Journal article.

“Just as we’d be appalled if any public figure of Rahm’s stature ever used the ‘N-word’ or other such inappropriate language, Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them – is unacceptable, and it’s heartbreaking.”

I’d like to say Palin is just another tea partier brewing politically advantageous storms in her Americana mug, but she has a point. Emanuel’s slur was surely a slip – probably not a fireable offence – but it’s an insensitive slip that is becoming too common in the US, and back at home.

“Retarded” has established itself in the lexicon as an alternative to words like “crap” and phrases like “it sucks”. “That’s so retarded” is a common complaint; “What a retard!” is a familiar put-down. And it can kill as a punch line. In Tropic Thunder, an actor is described a going “full retard” to win an Oscar.

But to describe someone or something as “retarded” is to use a kind of hate speech. It suggests that a person with a certain condition – and “retarded” has been rejected by medical and social organisations as a label for that condition – is somehow less of a person.

(For a great piece on “retarded” as hate speech, see this from America’s National Public Radio.) It is similar in some ways to the pejorative use of “schizo” and “gay” that has become so pervasive. We all use them, but none of us should.

Emanuel has run the gamut of official “apologydom” this month, issuing a public statement, meeting with leaders of disability groups and promising to consider legislation that would take the word “retarded” out of Federal law. It all felt a little Tiger Woods if you ask me, but it was a nonetheless fitting end to an awareness-raising moment in American politics.

It was also a bright moment for Palin. Here she was, a mother bear striking out on behalf of her son, Trig, who has Down’s syndrome. Even I, a Palin-hater from way back, admired her moxy. Then, just a few days later, she showed her cards.

When Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh fired the next shot in the “retard” wars, using the term as pejoratively as Emanuel, Palin’s response was decidedly more demure. The moose-hunting momma bear was nowhere to be seen.

“Our political correct society is acting like some giant insult’s taken place by calling a bunch of people who are retards, retards,” bellowed Limbaugh on his show days after the Journal piece was published. “I think their big news is he’s out there calling Obama’s number one supporters f’ing retards. So now there’s going to be a meeting. There’s going to be a retard summit at the White House.”

No Facebook essays from Palin on that outburst, just a tepid statement through a spokeswoman, Meg Stapleton. “Governor Palin believes crude and demeaning name calling at the expense of others is disrespectful,” said Stapleton’s note. It did not even mention Limbaugh by name. That would not have gelled with Palin’s Conservative base; even it had gelled with her supposed “principals”.

Pressed on the obvious double standard, Palin told Fox News, “I’m not politically correct. I am not one to be a word police.” She went on to agree with Limbaugh that the Obama supporters were “kooks” and claimed the radio host was using “satire” when he used the “r” word.

Satire?

Satire is a pretty slippery and amorphous little concept, I will grant you that, Sarah. It’s hard to clearly define something that can be applied to both George Orwell and the Wayans brothers. But were Limbaugh’s comments even remotely satirical? Or was he just a guy, like Rahm Emanuel and many of us, using an offensive word that has come to mean “idiot” – or “kook” – without regard for whom we might offend?

Even if we are to give Palin the benefit of the doubt, her campaign against the “r” word became even more surreally hypocritical this week when she came out against last Sunday night’s Family Guy episode. The episode featured a girl with Down’s syndrome who identified herself as the daughter of the former Governor of Alaska.

Aside from being insensitive, the show was uncomfortably unfunny. Stewie Griffin’s musical number, “Down Syndrome Girl,” fell particularly flat. He sang of a crooked-walking girl with a vice-like grip who’d just learned to tie her shoes Monday. The writers seemed like cruel school bullies picking on the special needs kids.

But it’s a satire right? So wheel out the spokesperson and let’s forget the whole thing. Time to talk tax cuts…

Not so fast. Palin issued a strong statement against the episode on Tuesday – again, through Facebook – that included a note from her daughter, Bristol. The younger Palin wrote that people with special needs’ “lives are difficult enough as it is, so why would anyone want to make their lives more difficult by mocking them?”

She went on: “If the writers of a particularly pathetic cartoon show thought they were being clever in mocking my brother and my family yesterday, they failed. All they proved is that they’re heartless jerks.”

Mom and daughter make a good point, yet again. If only they’d make them a little more consistently.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

60 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      06:12am | 22/02/10

      Scraping the bottom of the barrel for anti-Palin slurs, are we?

    • Pablo says:

      08:02am | 22/02/10

      The barrel is overflowing.

    • joe says:

      12:07pm | 22/02/10

      Why do the Left simply HATE Sarah Palin so much? It seems like bitter envy to me. A woman who has it all, but isn’t on the left. Shock! They try to make out she is clueless. If that was the case why would they keep going on about her so much? I’d vote for her any day.

    • H of SA says:

      12:10pm | 22/02/10

      Joe, the question you should be asking is why are the left AND the right so oppossed to Ms. Palin. Could it be the mainstream left and right have certain standards for public life they feel are unmet?

    • Robert says:

      01:56pm | 22/02/10

      Well, I’m obsessed with her because she’s such a cutie.

    • Cleo B. says:

      02:26pm | 22/02/10

      This is the woman who, on TV, thought Africa was a country! She should not be let lose near ANY political party!

    • Jack Thomas says:

      03:58pm | 22/02/10

      Nice work Cleo, what a looser she must be ey?

      I must admit I am confused why anyone give a rat’s tossbag about this woman. She’s not an Aussie, she’s not even an elected representative of the US these days either?

      She must be doing something to stir up such bitterness and hatred though.


      Maybe she is like our own Pauline, the Left actually want her around because it allows them to direct their bile at someone and blame her popularity on the convervatives, rather than look into themselves and their sad highly hypocritical lives.

      They chortle over Dave Letterman’s jokes, many of which are completely offensive, then ignore the revolting little man that he is in real life. Like some redneck scumbag thinking he can beat up an aboriginal because he’s drunk, these Leftards show exactly the same persona time and again to the likes of Sarah Palin.

      To quote the writer, “We all use them, but none of us should” (do we?)and “aside from being insensitive, the show was uncomfortably unfunny..” (like the Leftards and ABC luvvies’ favourite The Chaser, you mean?).

      Well no actually, we don’t, and no it wasn’t funny.

      The Left (including most of the media) perpetuate the fame and fortune of the likes of Pauline Hanson and Sarah Palin, then whine like a jet plane about how popular these people are.

      Get her off your pages and news and she will disappear.

      Oh well, I guess it keeps the Left from turning their bile onto the mainstream Aussie like they know they really want to.

    • Eric says:

      05:45pm | 22/02/10

      Yet the idiot who thought Austrian was a language, and that Afghanis speak Arabic, actually got elected ...

    • Tom says:

      06:14pm | 22/02/10

      Don’t worry, she can see Russia from her house.

    • Eric says:

      07:38pm | 22/02/10

      You’ve swallowed yet another anti-Palin lie, Tom. She can’t, and she never said she could. All that Palin said was that some Russian islands are visible from some Alaskan islands, which is true.

      You shouldn’t believe all the propaganda you hear. Look up the facts—it isn’t difficult, on the Internet.

    • Dan says:

      05:10am | 23/02/10

      But why would she claim she can see any part of Russia? Is is because she believes that it it giver her some special insight into foriegn policy? 

      Palin is an idiot and a hypocrite. Happilly, she has as about much chance of being the US President as Pauline Hanson had of becoming Australian PM.

    • Tom says:

      11:20am | 23/02/10

      Eric, yes I realise that was a Tina Fey quote, it doesn’t change the fact that her original quote was irrelevant, and that she is completely unfit for any public office, much less control of the world’s most powerful state.

      Here is the quote, by the way:

      “GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

      PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska. “

      Now tell me, how exactly does her response here in any way address the question?

    • Pablo says:

      07:28am | 22/02/10

      Haven’t we got enough “retard” pollies of our own, that we have to read about american ones?

    • Daisey May says:

      07:46am | 22/02/10

      You failed to mention that the woman who voiced the Down Syndrome character in Family Guy actually has Down Syndrome herself and was reported as saying that she thought the episode was funny. When you report a story it is important to include ALL the facts.

    • stephen says:

      11:00am | 22/02/10

      No. When you report a story, you report ONLY the facts.

    • T.Chong says:

      08:04am | 22/02/10

      The reason may be: in the US , Rush, along with several other extreme Right journalist / celebs - ( eg Glenn Beck) consider themselves King or Queen Makers within the Republican sphere. Rush even claimed so recently.
      Palin doesnt want to upset Rush and his support, and this lets Rush show just how influential he is that Palin wont or cant criticise him
      Rush was showing whos the boss.
      Our own version of this was The Parrot.

    • Grumbles says:

      08:05pm | 22/02/10

      Or maybe its that Rahm Emanuel is employed by tax payer money and hence is accountable to the American tax payer and Rush is not, to compare the two is rediculous, one MUST be held to a higher standard, the other will rise and fall on the back of public opinion. If you disagree with Rush turn off his show, but what if you disagree with Rahm Emanuel?

    • fortune dagger says:

      08:26am | 22/02/10

      Palin’s criticism of the pejorative use of ‘retarded’ is absolutely spot on - and her leniency regarding its use on opponents is therefore the worst kind of hypocrisy.

      The despicable, self-serving nature of those who cry “political correctness” when facing censure by others with actual empathy is highlighted by this lowbrow slanging match.

      What kind of human being throws a public tantrum when criticised for using ‘retard’ as a put-down? Grow up, Limbaugh.

      I’m all for freedom of speech. Freedom for you to call someone a retard. Freedom for everyone else to call you revolting. And freedom to point out any politically self-serving hypocrisy along the way.

    • Razor says:

      07:07pm | 22/02/10

      ... the worst kind of hypocrisy… really?  The worst?  You never seen anything as bad?

    • formersnag says:

      08:51am | 22/02/10

      All that female politician’s, bureaucrats, etc on both sides & around the world have proven so far, is that they can be just as corrupt, incompetent, contradictory, etc as their male counterparts. Don’t be left right out, vote against the sitting member in all electorates.

    • Nicole says:

      09:12am | 22/02/10

      What does her gender have to do with anything?

    • Nick says:

      10:46am | 22/02/10

      ...“female politician’s whats?” Is there some part of the anatomy referred to by this possessive? Maybe it’s a bit like the sign: ‘beware of the dog’s’. You have to ask what possession of the dog do I have to beware of?

      Please remember there is no apostrophe in plurals!

    • martinX says:

      02:46pm | 22/02/10

      Nicole, once uon a time, when female politicians just didn’t exist, we were promised that the world would be a kinder, gentler place if only we’d vote for the girls. Well, turns out that’s not true. This was, of course, well known but never acknowledged.

    • Sherlock says:

      09:23am | 22/02/10

      I love Sarah Palin. I have no idea of her policies or what she really stands for but anyone who upsets the left as much as her automatically gets me as a fan. Everytime the left set out to denigrate her just makes them look stupid and makes Palin more of a hero

    • John A Neve says:

      09:54am | 22/02/10

      Sherlock,

      Just what “left” are you talking about?

      Sara Palin seems to upset just about all sides in America!!!

    • H of SA says:

      10:00am | 22/02/10

      The problem for Palin is she upsets the mainstream right just as much as she upsets the left. And hurts the republican party more than she hurts the democrats

    • Steve Smith says:

      10:29am | 22/02/10

      @Sherlock: perfect example of how the word hero is used too often these days. People like Palin aren’t heroes, the real heroes have super powers and fly around with underwear over their tights saving the world from evil.

    • Pablo says:

      11:03am | 22/02/10

      Are you kidding? The “left” love her.

    • CSallen says:

      11:27am | 22/02/10

      I don’t know if this really deserves a comment, but “I love Sarah Palin. I have no idea of her policies or what she really stands for”???
      This is EXACTLY why the woman is still in US politics. Hardly anyone that votes for her has any idea of what she stands for or what her policies are. It really scares me that people that think like this vote in Australian elections

    • SLF says:

      12:39pm | 22/02/10

      People like this do vote in Australian elections and they all voted Liebor last time out.

      No idea about the Liebor policies, their beliefs or intentions, they just lapped up the spin. Politics is dead as there is no clear water between any of the parties as each tries desperately to tell you what they don’t stand for, but not what they acttually do.

    • Sherlock says:

      05:13pm | 22/02/10

      @CSallen at 11:27

      Talk about missing the point. For a start, seeing I have no vote in American elections I don’t really care what Sarah Palin’s policies are. All we can do is watch from afar and hope. Anytime you want to debate which is the worst labor government - Rudd or Whitlam, I’m up for it.

      Anyhow, my admiration for Ms Palin’s ability to rile the left seems to have annoyed you so that’s another feather in Sarah’s cap.

    • CSallen says:

      09:32am | 23/02/10

      Sherlock, I have no idea what your response was about. Sorry.

    • Beau Basin says:

      10:10am | 22/02/10

      Heroine Sherlock ..............heroine !!

    • C says:

      11:05am | 22/02/10

      If we can’t make fun of the “special needs community”, who can we make fun of? Those that make up the “special needs community” are not offended because they haven’t got a clue what you are on about. It is just the people who live in and around those with “special needs” that don’t have special needs that are offended.

    • Glen says:

      11:40am | 22/02/10

      Yep, mocking those who have no idea you are on about is clearly the most sensitive course of action

    • Vicki PS says:

      01:45pm | 22/02/10

      Yeah, making stupid faces at blind people and calling deaf people names is a real crack-up.

      I won’t bother trying to explain how people with intellectual disability have let the rest of the world know they don’t like being the butt of everyone’s jokes—you wouldn’t have a clue what I was on about, anyway.  (Never try to teach a pig to sing, it wastes your time and annoys the pig).

    • Zeta says:

      11:19am | 22/02/10

      The world stands at an economic cross roads, and the GOP’s only serious contender for the Presidency is campaigning on the use of the word ‘retarded’ by a man, Rahm Emanuel, who also popularised the term ‘c**k crushing thunder c***’ while referring to Hillary Clinton and is widely believed to vomit on foreign heads of state during meetings. That says something.

      There are problems in the Obama White House, no doubt, but the least of them is Emanuel’s crassness. If Palin were serious about being a political contender, and not content with being the Weird Al Yankovich of American politcs, she’d be attacking Emanuel for being a purely political operative in a job that needs a stead policy hand as well, like this very difficult to link article in the Financial Times does: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/b6b4700a-10fb-11df-9a9e-00144feab49a,dwp_uuid=03d100e8-2fff-11da-ba9f-00000e2511c8,print=yes.html

      But can she? Is Palin capable of a serious, adult thought? Great women in politics have had one thing in common: they have all been painfully smart. Consumate political operators. They’ve been able to see moves ahead of their opponents, and maneuver themselves accordingly.

      Palin, on the other hand, is matriarch of a family whose dysfunction rivals that of the cartoon comedies she’s intent on having banned for making fun of her ridiculously named, cognitiavely challenged granddaughter. She allowed her self to be manipulated, and man handled into ever more embarrasing situations by Republican strategists, including publically humiliating herself on Saturday Night Live. Her Policy platform ammounts to little more than ‘prayer’. She is a joke.

      Could it be that gender has nothing to do with Palin’s rise to mediocrity, but actually, a kind of affirmative action for the stupid?

    • watty says:

      11:34am | 22/02/10

      Is that the “n” word that is only to be used by black comedians?

      I have no problem with Emanuel awakening to the fact that some Democrats are retarded.

      I have no problems with Limbaugh suggesting there will be a meeting of the retatrds when referring to the Democrats.

      I have no problems with Palin taking sides….most politicians do

      But I do have a problem with a so called obnoxious short assed so called satirical comedian even suggesting (satirically of course) that everone should call Palin “FU****G RETARD”

    • Steve says:

      11:41am | 22/02/10

      Joel,

      I see you are a Pailin hater, saying she has 1.4M facebook fans which is frightening, but when Obama has 7.6M, no such comment.

      You are so worried Pailn will be the next president and replace, a president who has no policys no reform, failed on every promise, why are you not pointing out all of Obama’s failings instead of trying to shoot down Palin, who is making so many in roads into Obama’s misgivings, another leftist journo

    • Seano says:

      02:30pm | 22/02/10

      I know Obama’s the president but who’s this Palin?

    • Jay says:

      11:55am | 22/02/10

      Zeta - nice comment - other than it’s her son they were alluding to - not a granddaughter…

    • James says:

      10:12am | 23/02/10

      You can believe whatever you like Jay, but we all know that Palin’s “son” was actually her grandson and they covered up her daughter’s first pregnancy by saying it was Palin’s.  Just like Obama is a Kenyan Muslim, and George Bush worked for Halliburton while he planned the 9/11 attacks from the White House.  Wake up.

    • Sean Tobin says:

      12:00pm | 22/02/10

      Great piece, well argued.

    • Blossom says:

      12:06pm | 22/02/10

      Surprise!!! I am an Australian, I know nothing of Sarah Palin, other than I have heard from the Press, nor am I interested. We have enough in this country, without worrying about America’s. If she is ever president we will all be forced to pay attention to her, but for now shes a nothing to me

    • 6clegs - Palin is nuthin to joke about says:

      01:40pm | 22/02/10

      “Blossom”, it would be so nice if we here in Oz lived in a vacumn, but we don’t. Be scared, be very scared, and head for the south west of Tasmania if Ms Palin ever becomes President of the United States.

      If the thought of Tony Abbot becoming Prime Minister of Australia even makes ‘you’ mildly anxious, then the minutes contemplating Ms Palin as leader of the free world - with her finger even in the same room as “the red button’‘, - should be enough to make those who rather enjoy living in a (Iraq and Afghanstan aside) peaceful world to
      1/ find their nearest counsellor
      2/ rush to their nearest “outdoor” retailer
      3/ hire plane/pilot/parachute/s
      4/  beg/borrow/steal carton of vege seeds from nearest plant nursery
      5/ beg/borrow/steal [&learn; how to install/operate] solar panels
      6/ get accurate maps of the west or east coasts of Tas.

      Ms Palin does NOT take advice from *anyone*,  her hubris is so astounding it is off the planet!

      I truly believe that *IF* she were ever ‘elected’  POTUS that there would be another revolution in the U.S , and if she doesn’t blow us all into the next universe, Mandarin is what those left will be speaking. . .

    • Blossom says:

      05:00pm | 22/02/10

      6clegs How does my intrest or lack of intrest in Sarah Palin affect you? That long rant is rather silly and Tony Abbott does not scare me at all and either do you. I am simply not voting for him..end of story. Your a legend only to yourself. If Palin is ever President I will have no option but to learn about her but for now to me shes just another person from the USA

    • Bob H says:

      12:56pm | 22/02/10

      If only all politicians received equal roasting - unfortunately the press hunt in packs and Palin baiting appears acceptable - don’t do anything brave whatever you do.

    • Beagle says:

      01:22pm | 22/02/10

      Palin has put a target on her back by her backward thinking and right wing over the top rhetoric. She is not a serious contender for president. She is a to joke to herself and her party. Her continued presence on the political stage RETARDS the chances of the republican party.

    • Bob H says:

      03:42pm | 22/02/10

      @Beagle - And our politicians are not a joke?  agreed she is a no chancer but how come journalistic venom is used on a USA pollie and never a hard word against our own - smacks of being too scared to upset anyone incase they are interview blacklisted, career is more important than the truth.

    • T.Chong says:

      04:46pm | 22/02/10

      Geez Bob H don’t you read the articles at Punch.? Many articles here (and elsewhere, ) go to great lengths attacking our state and federal politicians. Did you read Dave Penberthy’s article on Sat.day about Conroy,? no punches pulled.
      (no more there should be for any politician of any party)
      The anti Labor bias articles do out number coalition criticism here though.

    • Hamish says:

      01:23pm | 22/02/10

      Can we please stop talking about Sarah Palin? The possibility of her 2008 Vice-Presidency and the millions of heart attacks that caused was bad enough, thanks.

    • Ziggy says:

      02:16pm | 22/02/10

      I find it refereshing that Palin will have a major say on who becomes the next US President and none of us commenting will. That has established the pecking order. This is a person who can draw a crowd of thousands in sub zero weather at 7am. So the comments about her lack of popular suppooert are just a load of BS.So back into your little boxes folks. Huff and puff away but in 2012 any serious presidential candidate will tread warily around Sarah and her popular base support - or they won’t get elected. Attack her at their peril.
      Love her or hate her - she’s got ‘star’ power with the emphasis on power.
      She is the lefitist metrosexuals greatest nightmare.

    • Tim says:

      02:28pm | 22/02/10

      Kyle Sandilands will have a bigger say on who wins the next Australian Federal election than anyone commenting here as well Ziggy.
      Does that tell you something?

    • Seano says:

      02:34pm | 22/02/10

      The same star power that took her storming into the white house? Oh wait it didn’t….not even close.

    • Steve Smith says:

      02:37pm | 22/02/10

      @Ziggy: In America, a groundhog can draw a crowd of thousands in sub zero weather. So I guess we can see Punxsutawney Phil running for office in 2012 too.

    • Seano says:

      02:33pm | 22/02/10

      I can’t help laughing when I see the very people who are the first to scream “POLTICAL CORRECTNESS” bickering amongst themselves..

    • Eno says:

      06:40pm | 22/02/10

      The girl that played the part of the disabled girl was indeed identically disabled.. Called “Her Royal Highness” someone with no sense of humour.

    • Razor says:

      07:15pm | 22/02/10

      Anybody asked Steady Eddie what he thinks?

      I love Sarah.  She upsets lefties and feminists so much.

    • SteveB says:

      10:37pm | 22/02/10

      So now that corporate money has been given free access to the US elections, how long till we see the Smith & Wesson/Goldline International Palin/Beck ticket announced?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Yo, mummy bloggers! Your expert input is required in this doozy of a child-rearing dilemma http://t.co/0JfOnCq1

Daniel Piotrowski

How we're getting ripped off at the ATM http://t.co/Vpu8DuHy

Anthony Sharwood

The factory where they make Boeing aeroplanes is the world's largest building #Todaysrandomfact.

Lucy Kippist

Can you wear skinny jeans when you're old enough to get a hip replacement? You bet: http://t.co/14b6UGnY

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Parenting. It’s the new oneupmanship. Ah, how quaint the days now seem when parents could raise…

Hipsters with hip replacements

Hipsters with hip replacements

Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…

La dole cheque vita is not so sweet on $16 a day

La dole cheque vita is not so sweet on $16 a day

Your task is simple. Here is $115.50. It must last one week. You have no savings, no assets, but thankfully…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter