Aboriginal reconciliation hit the headlines again this week with an extraordinary call for all non-indigenous Australians to make restitution for the crimes of theft and genocide – or leave the country.

Prepared to actually do something: former NT minister Alison Anderson

Dr Peter Adam said that atoning for the sins of the past required such a radical solution.

‘‘No recompense could ever be satisfactory because what was done was so vile, so immense, so universal, so pervasive, so destructive, so devastating and so irreparable,’’ Dr Adam said in a speech to the NSW Baptist Union.

‘‘It would, in fact, be possible, even if very difficult and complicated, for Europeans and others to leave Australia. I am not sure where we would go, but that would be our problem.”

The principal of Ridley College - the main Anglican theological college in Victoria - said churches shared responsibility because the land and wealth of churches came from land stolen from indigenous people.

‘‘The prosperity of our churches has come from the proceeds of crime. Our houses, our churches, our colleges, our shops, our sport grounds, our parks, our courts, our parliaments, our prisons, our hospitals, our roads, our reservoirs are stolen property.’‘

I don’t think there would be many Australians who would dispute that indigenous Australians were treated terribly when Australia whites first arrived – or that settlers moved in and just took the land they found.

Neither would they dispute that indigenous Australians continue to lag the rest of the country on almost every social yardstick: life expectancy, health, education, infant mortality, to name a few. Nor would they deny that we need to do all we can to help gain equality.

But there is one thing for sure. There would be a dispute about the need for current generations to sell up and get out to make restitution for events that began in 1788.

You wouldn’t need to be a genius to predict that the number of Australians flogging the family home and giving the proceeds of the sale to the traditional owners of their suburb before moving to an uninhabited coral atoll in the Pacific would number precisely zero. In fact, Dr Adam made no mention of where he would be relocating.

So from the standpoint of practical reconciliation, Dr Adam’s contribution, while gathering headlines, contributed nothing.

Interestingly, in sharp contrast to the theological posturing of Dr Adam, another minister was contributing to the debate about ways to improve life and social outcomes for indigenous people.

While Dr Adam was preparing his John Saunders Lecture, NT indigenous affairs minister Alison Anderson was preparing to quit her portfolio and the ALP to focus attention on the dire state of housing for indigenous Australians in the Top End.

By taking such action, she shifted the balance of power in the Territory assembly and shone a national spotlight on her concerns that the Henderson government was failing to deliver on promises to help her people.

It was an act of political courage and contributed far more to the real outcomes of her people than any hand wringing speech.

From this perspective, Anderson fits far more into the mould of indigenous leader Noel Pearson, who is seeking to end the blame game, take responsibility and show leadership.

Pearson has become a circuit breaker in the bid for reconciliation. He has challenged the orthodoxy of the welfare state “restitution” and has embarked on an ambitious series of measures to encourage discipline and personal responsibility in indigenous communities.

He wants government to end handouts, which he has labelled as a “scourge” that has kept aboriginal people locked in a cycle of dependency.

Several years ago, I had the good fortune of accompanying Pearson through a number of Cape York communities, where he was putting his theories to the test.

He was encouraging an end to the grog and setting up programs to help people stay in school, to stay in a job, to save for the future, to take control of their own destinies. And it was working.

Among the people taking ownership for improving their lives, there was no blaming, no demands for restitution from whites Australia and certainly no demands for Europeans and others to leave.

Perhaps one of the most memorable incidents for me came in a meeting in Aurukun where - among other requests - an indigenous elder called for the church to return. It had been the church that had taught her to read and write, skills that had for the most part vanished after the church left.

In a town where the petrol bowser was locked in a cage away from sniffers, where incest, rape and violence were commonplace, where children ran unchecked away from school, hers was a practical cry from the heart.

Dr Adam would do well to heed that plea, to take part in the debate about what the church can do now to help, rather than offer impractical solutions based on guilt from the past.

Most commented

21 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Dave Wilson says:

      07:23am | 14/08/09

      Instead of lecturing Dr Adam take some of your own advice. You perfected the art of setting people against either other during the Howard years, while pretending to be a Christian. It’s time for you to get off your pulpit cum soapbox and leave your divisive and unhealing tricks back in the past too.  I think you are just a confused neo-conservative follower that has hate in his heart. Like Jesus warned: Beware of the sheep in sheeps clothing.

    • Eric says:

      08:24am | 14/08/09

      Dave, it seems you’re the one sowing hatred and division here, along with Dr Adam.

    • Terry the Territorian says:

      08:38am | 14/08/09

      What the antics of Alison Anderson have done is effectively put back the Indigenous politicial movement by a decade.
      Qutting which was an effective dummy spit did not carry more influential than a speech.
      History will judge Alison as someone who chose to quit instead of helping to advance the betterment of coniditons for Indigenous Australians.
      I think most agree that the housing program and the bureaucrats overseeing it do need a rocket put up them but spitting the dummy and walking achieves nothing.

    • Dave Wilson (not Emily's cousin) says:

      08:54am | 14/08/09

      Eric, at least I have an opinion on the matter and the courage to call David out on his hypocrisy. (And lets add Pearson’s backflip on supporting the ill-fated election-timed ‘emergency intervention’  to the list of confused hypocrites) Do you have an opinion Eric or just lightweight judgements?

    • Eric says:

      09:20am | 14/08/09

      I have an opinion.

      Howard’s intervention was the best thing to have happened to remote communities in decades. Any walkback will only hurt the future of Aboriginal children.

      As foe Dr Adam, his comments are extremely provocative and divisive. That kind of talk splits the community into factions on the basis of race—saying that people of one racial group should stay and all the rest should leave. Let Dr Adam lead by example, and those who agree with him can follow.

    • Dewgong says:

      09:26am | 14/08/09

      Dave Wilson, the article seemed pretty tame to me and is a legitimate opinion on these matters, in contrast to the vitriolic spray of venom that was your comment.

      These are serious matters and they aren’t solved by using sweeping emotive assertions about “people with hate in their hearts” blah blah blah.

    • G says:

      09:40am | 14/08/09

      Most people will feign concern and indignation at the situation of indigenous population, but deep down this is really a non-issue for most people.

    • Mark B says:

      10:01am | 14/08/09

      We should take a leaf out of the NZ model. Its cornerstone has always been education, and it takes time. What happened to the Aboriginals 250 years ago, and since, has happened to indigenous people all over the world; it was considered acceptable practice. Today we all agree it was appalling but you can’t retrospectively legislate morality and punish today. The Howard intervention was just a pre-election stunt after the media attention to appalling situations, previously ignored. If I was in charge I would build Indigenous Education Centres all over the country with villages attached. You get to live in the village as long as you/and or your kids are studying or gaining skills. If you live in the village you look after the house and you behave. It would cost money, we can afford it, the indigenous people deserve it.

    • Mark B says:

      10:20am | 14/08/09

      G is right; no wonder given the failures. A colleague said recently “no-one gives an f… But we cannot pontificate to other countries about human rights and curruption when we have 10 year old girls getting raped by drunken adults or 14 year olds offering passing truck drivers sex in exchange for money to buy petrol to sniff. It’s a blight on our national character and we wouldn’t allow it to happen to our daughters.

    • Eric says:

      10:45am | 14/08/09

      Mark B, this is not a ‘human rights’ issue, it’s a crime issue. The people who insist on Aboriginal “rights” to live without law enforcement are perpetuating the problem.

    • Anthony says:

      11:57am | 14/08/09

      Well, I assume that all those Protestant Scots who settled in Ireland will be doing the same, as well as the non-indigenous populations of North and South America - this fatuous statement by Dr Adams does no good at all for anyone genuine about reconciliation. All it will do is ignite passions among the idiots and ideologues on both sides of the reconciliation debate.

      There are a lot of good people out there working hard to find solutions - Dr Adams is patently not one of them.

    • DJG says:

      12:17pm | 14/08/09

      Please ! Surely Dr Adam was just being extreme, to clearly set out that we the non indigenous were and still are responsible for the plight of the Aboriginal. Mr Gazard your political masters did nothing to correct or alleviate the situation in 12 long years of power. Please dont chuck your two bob in now. Its not helpful, but i suspect your not trying to be. Dog whistling springs to mind.

    • Mark B says:

      12:33pm | 14/08/09

      Eric, it is a human rights issue, in my opinion. The little girls who are abused, and all of their brothers, all of whom have no hope of a decent education, have been allowed to be born into a situation where they have no rights, no chance, and can have no hope. This is what breeds crime, and a permanent cost to the wider community. Crime is a manifestation of a problem, and gives the problem visibility. There were plenty of warnings about what was happening, well before “the intervention”. It will take a generation to fix, and if we don’t fix it, we will create another generation of problems.

    • stephen says:

      12:33pm | 14/08/09

      Just what part of civilization does the good Doctor not like ?

    • Dewgong says:

      02:19pm | 14/08/09

      Anthony, don’t forget the Turks, who gradually drove out the Greek peoples and cultures out of Asia Minor and Constantinople/Instanbull, and While we’re at it we should hand Andalusia back to the Moors and St Petersburg back to the Swedes.

      /sarc off.

      I suspect Dr Adam didn’t really think much through before he made these comments, and is evidently quite ignorant on reconciliation issues.

    • Mark B says:

      04:08pm | 14/08/09

      And Eric, you use the same logic as the Chinese hierarchy that many of us deem to criticise. At least the Chinese can say they have dramatically improved the lot of their 1.4 billion people.

    • glorified says:

      04:23pm | 14/08/09

      Dr Adams,The English were in charge of all that happened all those years ago,That part of Australia’s history is out of our hands and NOT any Australians fault ,Whatsoever,However that great Aboriginal Noel Pearson has the answer,Stopping the blame game,giving back by uplifting the Aboriginal peoples ,giving them back their sence of self.That is what any decent Australian backs one hundred percent,

    • watto says:

      12:13am | 16/08/09

      Does dog whistling contribute to a debate about a serious and ongoing issue that Howard ran from for over a decade and Rudd has poorly managed since? Perhaps Aboriginal people would be more appropriate to comment on a how the intervention is going? Reading indigenous news, I get the impression that the intervention is now acting against reconciliation and any goodwill (controversially) that might have existed early on? Can you name some indigenous community leaders that back your wild idea that a single priest is winding the clock back? What is your agenda here David - I’m not sure you are being up front with this article?

    • Sam says:

      01:08pm | 26/11/11

      Noel person speeks for his well off community and people, if you were half informed on Aboriginal issues you would be aware each community has speakers for their own communitys issues. To Aboriginal people he is seen as   a coconut, he is to disconnected to real Aboriginal issues in his government advisor 100,000 a year job, the racists love him. Either the complexcity of laws and rights are beyond these people or they are very ignorant, and you all wonder how we know your laws better then you lot. I can see how ignorance is bliss.

    • nike free run 2 says:

      04:31pm | 30/10/12

      Thank you for all of the labor on this web site. My mother really loves doing investigations and it is easy to understand why. My partner and i hear all concerning the powerful means you convey efficient tips and hints on this website and as well as boost response from some others on this theme then our child is in fact discovering a lot of things. Take pleasure in the remaining portion of the new year. You’re the one conducting a superb job.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Lucy Kippist

A story that's close to my heart - can living overseas change your life for the better? With thanks, @Alisa_reduxhttp://t.co/n6tksJstqs

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter