I was catching up with a mate for a drink on Friday who I hadn’t seen in quite some time.

Unreal, banana peel. Cartoon: Warren Brown.

We’re good friends, we actually go way back, but there’s always been one aspect of his personality that drives me a little insane. Whenever I see him, he persistently quotes Eddie Murphy’s Delirious stand up show. 

He can’t stop.  It’s impossible.  If doctors were to examine him, I’m 74 per cent certain they’d uncover some sort of degenerative disease that prevents him from doing anything except quote Eddie Murphy.

The first few times it was entertaining.  Then it got a little annoying.  Then it started to really tick me off.  Now, I’m one more Eddie Murphy anecdote from going on a three day killing spree.

The funny thing is, as a PR person, I’m often training clients to ‘stay on message’. 

In politics the golden rule is usually, “don’t worry about the question you’re asked.  Rather, answer the question you wish you were asked.”

This works effectively with politicians because they have been media trained to within an inch of their life and boy, does it show.

A great example of this is our current Prime Minister.  She is possibly the most ‘on message’ politician in the history of western civilisation (narrowly edging out Alfred Deakin in second place and William the Conqueror in third. Mark Latham is last.).

Have you ever watched one of her media briefings or press conferences?  You can’t help but be impressed. 

It is, in a lot of ways, largely irrelevant what question she is asked because she has her go-to method of answering it, which is to essentially not answer it at all.  In fact, 2UE journalist Latika Bourke proclaimed Julia Gillard as ‘The Queen of Unanswered Questions” in the recent federal election campaign.

If she is asked a tough question, the PM will give a little laugh, make a dry observation and then say something completely irrelevant.  She then turns to another journalist who will ask something completely different. 

In other words, she manages to avoid difficult questions with the ease of Isabel Lucas ordering another apple martini.

A key part to Gillard’s effectiveness is her repetition of messages.  Most recently, her use of the phrase ‘moving forward’ has come under scrutiny due to the monotonous repetition by which she used it and its breach of copyright with Toyota.

In fact, in her first press conference of the election campaign she used the phrase ‘moving forward’ an astonishing 35 times.

To put this in perspective, that’s one more than atomic number of selenium. 

It’s one more than Edmond Dantès’s prisoner number in The Count of Monte Cristo. 

It’s 52 less than the number of drug charges Lindsay Lohan has received in the past six months. 

And it’s a whopping 72 short of the number of fake laughs David Koch’s guests have offered in the past three weeks.

Still, it was a lot and it started to grate on the electorate.  In fact, when ABC journalist Mark Simkin played 10 ‘moving forwards’ in fast succession on his evening bulletin, it looked like something out of a stand up comedy routine.

The question here is, when does being ‘on message’ start to hurt your image?  Can politicians be so on message that it starts to annoy journalists and the electorate so journalists end up writing a negative article and voters vote for someone else?

During the campaign, Ms Gillard thought she had in fact been ‘too on message’ and made a vow that now people would see the ‘real’ her, (which begs the question, who the hell was the red headed woman at all those press conferences if it wasn’t her??). 

It didn’t really work (she stayed as ‘on message’ as she had been previously, but the point is an interesting one.  Perhaps the Australian public actually expects our politicians to be a little more open.

In light of this, next time I see my mate and he opens his mouth to start quoting Eddie Murphy, I might give him the same advice Mr. T so often gives.

“Shut up, fool!” 

Most commented

47 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Jb says:

      05:58am | 24/09/10

      I just wish Witchypoo would shut up, watching the school mistress stomp her feet over the massive surprise the opposition were not going to join the independents and offer the Rudd/gillard govt a free ride.
      The real games are going to be right here for the next two weeks and while I am on the games shouldn’t old take it like a man Rudd be in india sorting out that mess or east Timor sorting out that mess as opposed to grandstanding throwing money around in his UN job interview?
      Watching his I’m the answer to the problems of the world interviews have done nothing but remind me that I missed him not one bit and the brutal assassination from his old chum gillard was actually putting Australian out of their misery!
      Think we can get rid of him permanently this time, jooles must cringe everytime he gets up there with all those foreigners!
      Let the games begin…

    • Brian Taylor says:

      06:00am | 24/09/10

      you will never change politicians because as you say, they are trained to lie, cheat and steal. (last two are my words)
      If I had a dollar for every politician that was either sacked from their job and/or sent to jail (where most of them belong anyway) I’d never have to work another day in my life.
      Wouldn’t the world be a much better place without politicians in it?
      hey, theres a story line you can follow up with Dylan

    • dead to me says:

      07:13am | 24/09/10

      Lets review:

      - Obama snubbs Australia again. He is going to Indonesia? I guess he has already met the ‘real’ PM aka Rudd and doesn’t see the point in meeting with the ‘unreal’ version.
      -Post election the PM has not done anything, asylum seeker chaos inside and outside Australia, Health care is costing more and in utter chaos, utility rates soaring together with interest rates and the average Aussie family finding it more difficult to make ends meet…...
      - Gillard actually feels proud of her under achievements and not having a majority government.

      Boy if this is our PM, we are in big trouble guys.

    • Doug Rhodes says:

      07:27am | 24/09/10

      Indeed a worrying trend that our politicians use these slogan type messages,no doubt a saturating carpet bombing of the mind. Great big tax and moving forward being the latest offerings, but the most offensive one was ...weapons of mass destruction…if it was stated once,it was stated a million times as a justification of the Iraqi invasion,by governments with more weapons of mass destruction than Saddam could have ever dreamed of ,sheer bloody hypocrisy. Maybe the sloganeers will one day say,no more, the public will not be conned so readily.

    • Jim says:

      07:43am | 24/09/10

      I think Chris Bowen is giving Joolya a run for her money in the Unanswered Questions department. Leading in to teh election everytime he was on TV I wanted to throw something! Penny Wong makes me laugh but….her body language and the arrogant way she won’t look people in the eye is as if KRudd has been superimposed onto her.

    • Macca says:

      07:49am | 24/09/10

      The ALP machine currently has a swathe of politicians who are excellent at staying on message. Penny Wong, Kevin Rudd, Stephen Conroy and the PM herself are all increadibly clever politicians.

      However, it is a shame that they haven’t spent as much time working through the execution of their policies - and the policies themselves for that matter - than they have media training and obsessing with focus groups and the daily news cycle.

    • fairsfair says:

      12:52pm | 24/09/10

      I think it is for that very reason that they are “successful” Macca. They appear to be doing something all the time and the general population buys it, because face it - most people don’t have the interest or the time to care about the broader policies.

      They are always talking. Always on the news. Very productive apparently. It reminds me of that “The Office” email that went round a couple of years back. If you have two jackets so you can always leave one on the back of your chair and sigh a lot - you are working hard.

      They are staying on message, but that message is to Baffle with Bullshit.

    • davo says:

      08:04am | 24/09/10

      Imagine the following scenario: During tomorrow’s press conference, the first question asked is, “Were you being honest during the election when you said there would not be a carbon tax under your government?” The PM’s response is something like “Blah blah, non answer, blah blah. Next question please?”
      If the next journo selected ploughs on into their question, they’ll get the same response. If however, they say something like, “Hang on, I’m not asking a new question till you answer the last one”, and all their buddies from the Holy Grail do the same thing, maybe we’d get some action!
      I know, I know, I’m usually the one tearing down idealistic clap trap proposals and I know this won’t work, but sometimes it’s fun to dream…

    • Anie says:

      08:31am | 24/09/10

      Hello - are there any Labour supporters out there?

    • Jim says:

      08:47am | 24/09/10

      Probably Anie, but it’s 08:45 on a Friday…the barra season is about to open and it’s a lovely day for fishing so half of them will have called a strike. About a quarter of them have no arts lectures on this morning so they’re sleeping off a bong-over, and the rest can’t afford to turn on their computers till after the high peak period because of the criminal electricity rates we now have!

    • Steve says:

      09:10am | 24/09/10

      Yes Anie, but many alternate points of view are not published here on Punch.

    • Dom says:

      09:21am | 24/09/10

      @Anie,
      Yes.  I’m all for hard work.  Natural labour is also preferable to caesareans, where possible.  I can’t say I support child labour, though.

    • dovif says:

      09:53am | 24/09/10

      Journo: Gillard why have you lied about the Carbon tax before the election?
      Gillard: We are moving forward, unlike the last term, when we were moving backwards, since that question was in the past and happened 1 minute ago, we are moving forward and have no time to answer that question
      Journo: Why have you scraped the NW rail line in Sydney
      Gillard: We are moving forward, the NSW ALP have scrapped that 10 times already, we are moving forward and allowing them to scrapped it for the 11 time. Moving forward, there will be a Liberal government in NSW. We do not want them to have the good press moving forward
      Journo: Do you think your government is as bad as Rudd’s, it has only be 2 weeks and there are multiple backflips already
      Gillard: we are moving forward, very hard to do backflips when you are moving forward, so those really weren’t backflips, it was moving sideways then moving forward

    • davo says:

      10:18am | 24/09/10

      Love your work Dom

    • Nicole says:

      10:44am | 24/09/10

      Cute Dom, way to go. Nothing reasonable to add to the debate, so go for spelling errors. Perhaps you might like to go and do a little research and find out when and why Labour became the Labor party.

    • Max Vaunted says:

      11:08am | 24/09/10

      Anie, you’ll need to get onto an ABC blog. This one seems to be more for people who’ve grown heartily sick of endlessly repeated slogans, patronising symbolic gestures, focus groups, government by media release, spin and prevarication, and for the most part don’t denigrate, label or verbally abuse those who don’t happen to agree with them.

    • Bethany says:

      11:11am | 24/09/10

      Davo, I’d love to see this happen. I find it infuriating that politicians can effectively refuse to answer questions. Qanda seems to be the only place they’re not allowed to get away with it.

    • Danny B says:

      11:24am | 24/09/10

      I’ll second that.  Time the policitians started actually answering thier bosses - the people.

    • Andrew says:

      05:12pm | 24/09/10

      @Anie: Less than 4 out of 10 Australians apparently!

    • Reg says:

      10:53pm | 24/09/10

      Anie you’ll notice that far the majority of the pro-Liberal remarks were written before lunch. We may presume from this that after lunch on Friday most of them were, to use a quaint description, in their cups. wink

      I can’t help noticing that the humourless statistics in the article were a labour intensive filler of rudimentary value.  4 out of 10 Dylan.

    • Kirribilli Kim says:

      08:43am | 24/09/10

      What a great article!  Read fast, amusingly and informatively!

    • Joan says:

      08:56am | 24/09/10

      From the day Gillard knifed her way to the top I have said she uses manipulative language, to excuse, justify and evade.  A classic socialist trait. - something she possibly learned during her Socialist Forum days.

    • Steve Thompson says:

      09:11am | 24/09/10

      I didn’t notice any difference at all between the old Julia and the “real” Julia. We just had an extra slogan. And now I can’t see any difference with the PM Julia. All the same robot, treating voters like idiots.

      I would like to get rid of all politicians and have the country run by some competent managers.

    • Carlos says:

      09:15am | 24/09/10

      Every politician does this. Dylan has done a great job of illustrating the concept in this article. Great read.
      I remember watching Tony Abbot show the nation how it’s done in a pre-election interview on the Today show. It drove me insane to the point where I was shouting at the TV, politely requesting that he answer the question.

    • Nicole says:

      09:26am | 24/09/10

      This is brilliant and so true. This woman can never just give a straight answer to a straight question. You have summed her up perfectly.

    • jg says:

      09:36am | 24/09/10

      I’m just amazed at how quickly she’s gone from flirty julia to robotic julia.

      She looks and sound like a haitian zombie.

      without doubt the most unreal PM we have ever had,

    • dovif says:

      09:40am | 24/09/10

      Let just all start moving forward from this

      The fact that she want to start moving forward, does that means we were moving backwards in Labor’s first term

      Was Gillard moving backward during the BER, for example most private school was able to get the same done for 75% less than the government. when the government can offer 10 school at one time (which would normally get them a discount) So it sure look that Gillard was moving forward.

      Maybe Gillard heard that Bob Katter offered to walk (move) backward from Bourke to Chartered Tower, if there was a gay or lesbian in Chartered Tower, perhaps Gillard was trying to move forward and form government by joining Katter on the Moving forward walk from Bourke to Chartered Tower

      Maybe Gillard is so controlled by the ALP Arbib machine that she has forgotten how to walk and has to remind herself “moving forward left, moving forward right ....

    • Zeta says:

      10:11am | 24/09/10

      “Minister, could you tell us what you had for breakfast?”

      “Thank you for that question, I think it’s important, but I think what people really want to know is what I had for lunch. I brought my lunch to work today, it was a toasted jaffle…”

      “Minister that’s not what I asked you, I asked you what you had for breakfast.”

      “I heard the question, and I’m telling you what I had for lunch. It was a toasted jaffle, I brought the sandwich into work and utilised a jaffle maker in the possession of one of my staff. The filling was a left over brisket my wife prepared last night. The jaffle, as a light lunch, I feel has been under utilised by working Australians looking for a quick and easy meal solution that doesn’t feel as though it’s been marinating in lunch box bacteria all day. I also had a banana, as a kind of desert. For afternoon tea, I intend to have a small tub of yogurt.”

      “But back to our original question, what did you have for breakfast this morning.”

      “Look breafast is a vital part of a nutritionaly balanced lifestyle, I’m not going to debate that. And I think the people of Australia are right to be curious as to what I’ll have for breakfast tomorrow. The quantum, at this stage, looks to be crystalising around a bowl of cereal.”

      “Minister if that’s the case, you’ll have no problem telling us what you had for breakfast this morning?”

      “Well I think tomorrows breakfast will be reflective of what I’ll have for breakfast any day of the week, but that moves us toward the very important question of what I’ll be having for lunch, and the real issue - what I had for lunch today and can I just add my jaffle was delicious.”

      “Thank you Minister. We’re out of time.”

    • Jim says:

      11:01am | 24/09/10

      Zeta, I love you!

    • rick says:

      11:20am | 24/09/10

      Zeta, are you losing your magic touch?

    • Macca says:

      11:40am | 24/09/10

      I think I’ve seen something like this before by John Clarke. Still, Awesome interpretation!

    • stephen says:

      12:06pm | 24/09/10

      Ha !  And no rick, he’s getting funnier.

    • Andrew says:

      05:14pm | 24/09/10

      But what’s for dinner?

    • Reg says:

      11:50am | 25/09/10

      Well since the moderator is obviously a Liberal supporter, I’ll try again.

      Zeta if you ask idiot questions you would be very fortunate indeed, NOT to be treated as an idiot.  I repeat, a journalist who asks what the prime Minister had for breakfast or worse, “how do you feel” at a military funeral, should be shown the door with the proverbial boot up his ginger.

    • Bonaroo says:

      10:16am | 24/09/10

      Entertainingly exposed.  The repetition does begin to congeal into sort of a plastic veneer.  If a ‘real person’ acted like a politician in day to day life, they would have no (ok, maybe very few) friends.  It’s in-sincere and obnoxious, but I guess that’s the name of the game.  How do they take themselves seriously?

    • Sydney says:

      10:39am | 25/09/10

      Bonaroo I don’t know where you’re from but I moved to Sydney from country Queensland 30 years ago and this is how Sydney people behave. They are groomed for standard replies and work hard at disclosing as little as possible on the assumption that information withheld, is power.
      This makes them easy prey to questions that reveal their reticence and you should see them perform when you rephrase their bullshit responses. Talk about standard Sydney gray.

    • JM says:

      10:52am | 24/09/10

      Julia is effective !

    • Andrew says:

      05:17pm | 24/09/10

      WTF does that mean?

      I’m gonna lose a lot of money. Done. I’m effective. Well done me!!

      Must admit though she is effective with a knife. Just ask KR

    • JulesG says:

      11:08am | 24/09/10

      Isn’t this the mark of a good statesperson? Tony Abbott is cunning and ruthless and would stop at nothing to gain power, whether it was in Australia’s interest or not. He even admits to not telling the truth. At least Julia is honest and sincere in her side stepping and she does it sooooo well!

    • Danny B says:

      11:33am | 24/09/10

      I’d like to draw your attention to the TV series ‘Yes Minister’ and ‘Yes Prime Minister’, a rather excellent piece of work from the late 80s.  Originally written as a satire, in this day and age it’s now quite an eye-opener. 

      The ‘Official Secrets’ episode of Yes Prime Minister in particular is rather instructive.  There’s a memorable scene where the Prime Minister instructs his private secretary on six different methods of evading press questions and delivering your own message - and if you look carefully, you can see these techniques in use by today’s politicians.

    • dancan says:

      11:44am | 24/09/10

      I actually find it quite disgusting the way Julia and politicians in general avoid questions or just simply ignore them.  I find it insulting that the prime minister of this country treats the public and media with such contempt as to openly ignore a question! 

      I also find it revolting that media are unwilling to press a question to get a real answer, but I don’t really blame them since I’m certain that if a reporter did, they’d promptly be removed from the press conference.

    • fairsfair says:

      02:15pm | 24/09/10

      yeah, but if the media ganged up - the pollies would have to fall in line. They have a shark/sucker fish relationship. I am having difficulty working out which is which - they both exibit traits of both.

      I would love to see the media stand firm and refuse to be played. I’d certainly tune into that set of news over Tony Jones. Man that dude is really starting to get up my nose lately. Credit where credit is due - he does press the question on occasion - but is quite selective in doing so.

    • P says:

      12:29pm | 24/09/10

      Good article. But I think that the point at which a line or message is said so often that people watching interviews and reading newspapers become furiously annoyed with the repetition is the point at which some politicians can feel they have reached success. Some believe they are not giving interviews for the sake of the audience of the interview, or to provide answers. They are giving them in the hope that four seconds of the interview will be used as a grab in the evening news. They know the vast majority of the electorate will never sit through an interview, read daily newspapers or follow political commentary. But they may watch the 6pm news.

    • Against the Man says:

      02:31pm | 24/09/10

      C’mon fake PM answer the tough questions so we can expose your lies smile

    • Stewart Henstock says:

      03:35pm | 24/09/10

      Parliamentary reforms??
      I think the PM and the Leader of the Opposition should be made to have 6 debates outside of the election cycle.

    • Dave says:

      04:45pm | 24/09/10

      Great read Dylan. When’s the next article coming???

    • Reg says:

      09:19am | 25/09/10

      What? Bored with “Are you being Served” Dave?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @PSyvret: As if anyone needs reminding of the bigoted pond-scum out there, this arrived in my in-box this morning: http://t.co/Lfu5ntmq

Daniel Piotrowski

@christoforpaine hope youre OK.. and the bali trip is still on!

Paul Colgan

RT @BusInsiderAU: WATCH: Will Smith Does A Fresh Prince Rap Reprise On British TV - http://t.co/Filsoi00AT

Paul Colgan

ping @TheStalwart - Ireland looking at phasing out Apple's tax arrangements http://t.co/fZESvMZJsW

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter