When Julia Gillard appeared on stage at the end of a punishing Saturday night to try to make sense of the deadlocked election result she opened with a quote from former President Bill Clinton after a previous US election: “The people have spoken, but it’s going to take a little while to determine exactly what they said.”

Well, if she is still in doubt about the message the people of Australia sent through the ballot box, she might like to read what they have been saying in cyberspace.
Even before election night was over, voters started sending a flurry of comments to online news sites with explanations and their own analysis of why the nation was staring at a hung parliament.
While a swag of marginal seats in Queensland and NSW recorded a swing to the Coalition, this was not necessarily seen as an endorsement of them by commenters. The overall mood was mainly one of disappointment with both Labor and the Coalition and a feeling that neither side had convinced the electorate of their worthiness to rule.
As Dieter D pointed out on ABC Online: “Labor and Liberal spent the entire campaign trying to convince Australia the other party wasn’t fit to govern - and succeeded.”
Posting on Perth Now, Mark of Perth thought Labor had self-destructed but he did not find much inspiration in Tony Abbott as an alternative: “I’m pretty sure it had more to do with Labor’s political suicide rather than anything wondrous Abbott did. Both leaders were just as uninspiring as each other and this was reflected by an uninspiring election result.”
Comments revealed a mixed bag of issues that contributed to the ruptured Labor vote.
Graham of Oz on News.com.au highlighted two that influenced him not to return a Gillard Government: “Labor lost my support due to the mining tax. However, they lost my respect when they dumped a democratically-elected leader. I could have been wrong, but I doubt whether the loss would have been greater with Kevin Rudd as leader … It will take me a long time to trust the Labor machine again.”
In a comment to ABC Online, Daniel F said Labor had lost touch with its traditional support base: “They didn’t have the courage to stand up on matters that their supporters care about - principally doing something meaningful about climate change and taking a compassionate approach to refugees. Too much ‘me-too’ made them look like a cynical and weak imitation of Tony Abbott.”
Labor suffered its biggest losses in Queensland and NSW. Courier-Mail reader Ian Coffey of Townsville cited the influence state politics had and called for the Queensland Premier to resign: “The fact of the matter is that the two states with the highest swings against Labor happen to be where the state Labor governments are most on the nose. Anna Bligh, do the decent thing and fall on your sword for all our sakes.”
Terry of NQ added: “Regardless of the final outcome, the message is loud and clear. Labor has to clean out the backroom boys and the toxic state leadership in Queensland and NSW and actually get back to looking after the working people of this country as they have failed to do in the last three years. Labor at a state and federal level has proved to be mushrooms, big heads and short stalks. How long before the Queensland election? I can’t wait.”
Daniel of Melbourne, in a comment to The Herald Sun, pointed to the large swag of voters who decided to swing to the Greens: “I can tell the major parties what happened. It wasn’t leaks, it wasn’t fiscal policy. It was a complete absence of any real difference in policy and maybe the absence of any real policy. At least the Greens still believe in something and work to achieve real objectives.”
The possibility of Labor obtaining the backing of three or four Independents to form government did not inspire much confidence for change in the eyes of News.com.au reader Ironic: “So it is now up to four independent men rather than six faceless union leaders. Does anyone feel like we have moved forward?”
Steve questioned the governing ability of a minority Labor government, writing on the Herald Sun site: “Labor weren’t stable with a majority government. How could they be stable with a minority one?”
Meanwhile, Eddie of Sydney, predicted the instability would lead to another election being called before too long: “Here we go. A hung parliament with independents running the country. It does not matter which side buys the prize it will not last and we will be voting again within 18 months.”
Some online readers thought the spectre of a hung parliament should prompt changes to the electoral system. An optimistic Lincoln Fung of Canberra, writing to The Australian, said: “The new uncertain political landscape may also present unprecedented opportunities to reform Australia’s election system, more independent and effective federal policy assessments and scrutinies. The hung parliament may be shorter in life, but it may start a new political chapter for the future earlier.”
So who really won Saturday’s election?
In the unending hangover from the election maelstrom, Herald Sun reader Tony of Melbourne declared democracy the victor: “The Australian voting public have come of age! As a nation we have seen through the lies, hypocrisy and political spin of both sides of political persuasion. We don’t want any of them to have a free rein over our lives because we do not trust them at the moment. We await a true leader. Congratulations to the Australian public!”
The people have spoken.
Facebook Recommendations
Read all about it
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it
An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…
Our special forces don’t always need special treatment
We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…
A good holiday is about unrest, not rest
Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
Michael S says:
"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone
Change Up! says:
I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]Gentle jabs to the ribs
They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more
Most commented