Peter Costello has become a permanently destabilising influence within the Liberal Party and should get out of politics unless he’s prepared to run for the leadership or rule out mounting a challenge, a growing number of Liberal MPs believe.

With June 30 looming as the date by which Mr Costello must decide whether to re-nominate for his seat of Higgins, fed-up Liberals believe he should only do so again if he can give a clear indication either way as to his leadership intentions.

In a special report on Mr Costello’s future, The Punch can reveal that the jockeying has begun in Melbourne for his blue-ribbon seat.

Institute of Public Affairs executive director John Roskam tells our website below that if Mr Costello does not nominate for Higgins he will put his name forward, saying the party needed an injection of new talent that was focussed on the future.

Former ALP national secretary Tim Gartrell has also written for the website labelling Mr Costello “a 14-year weapon of mass distraction” whose ability to divide not only his own party but the general public was a boost for Labor.

Liberal MPs told The Punch they are “fed up” with Mr Costello’s ability to take attention away from Malcolm Turnbull, who they believe has started to damage Kevin Rudd’s Government by targeting Labor over debt and the deficit.

“Everyone loves Peter but it’s now a case of p*** or get off the pot,” one Liberal MP said.

“I think people are over him. People are a bit sick of the whole dance of a thousand veils thing.

“If there was a ballot Malcolm would win it in a canter. The parliamentary party is really not interested in whether he re-nominates, if he does it’s not like we’ll all be throwing our hands in the air for joy, basically we want him to shut up and let Malcolm have a go.”

Another MP said: “The will-he-or-won’t-he speculation is indulgent and it’s damaging for the party.”

Some MPs said they wanted Mr Costello to stay because he added extra talent and experience to the Liberal team, but feared that speaking up in favour of him “because saying Costello should stay can be misread as a vote of no confidence in Malcolm.”

Frontbencher Tony Abbott said the prevailing view might be that Mr Costello should go but that it wasn’t necessarily “the considered view”.

“As a general principle I would like to see people of ability in the party, not out of it,” Mr Abbott said.

Mr Costello was the focus of anger within the party last month when, one week after the federal budget, two different polls, Newspoll and Nielsen, both pointed to a weakening in Labor’s vote which both sides of politics regarded as a sign of voter disquiet over the Government’s $58 billion deficit.

On the day the Nielsen poll came out Peter Costello did three interviews in three hours - which one Liberal MP labelled “nothing more than vanity” and others regarded as an unfair muddying of Malcolm Turnbull’s message on a rare good day.

Costello spoke to 3AW in Melbourne, 2GB in Sydney, and spoke here to ABC Radio where he was rightly quizzed straight-up about what prompted his latest foray into the public domain.

In his ABC interview Costello made light of what’s been labelled attention-seeking behaviour with the launch of his new website, petercostello.com.au, on the same day of the Federal Budget.

The site - which Labor hardnut Anthony Albanese re-named iamavailable.com.au - has been the subject of no small amount of groaning and eye-rolling from the Libs, who are irritated by the constant speculation.

In his ABC interview, Costello spent less time hammering the government than he did being quizzed about his future.

“People say to me ‘will you run for re-election in 2010’ and I have said ‘look I will think about that when it comes up’,” he told ABC radio.

“I am not focusing on those sorts of things because the way I look at it… having been elected at the last election, my obligation is to work for the electorate which I do.”

25 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Penny says:

      07:31am | 15/06/09

      Costello should stay. Turnbull should go.

    • Eric says:

      07:34am | 15/06/09

      Let’s see, a Labor Party advisor and a journalist at the left-wing Age both think Costello should go.

      So nice of the Liberals’ enemies to offer them helpful advice.

    • pat says:

      08:26am | 15/06/09

      i can only expect another left wing bunch of reporters to bring this old beat up of a story out again. How about u guys look at how Rudd n co are screwing our country big time for a change?the biggest shame and loss to our country’s properity is that u guys WILL NOT go after a labor gov for the truth as much as u did the libs

    • watty says:

      08:54am | 15/06/09

      Considering your Daily Telegraph Editorial decision   to “go with Labor” the Saturday of the 2007 election I feel this article should be taken with a fair shake of the sauce bottle or whatever.

    • Kate says:

      09:02am | 15/06/09

      Great piece. I am so frustrated with Costello’s self indulgent behaviour (I am not left wing, a labor party adviser or a journalist with The Age).

      The Govt needs to be made accountable by a strong opposition and the Libs aren’t strong while the leadership is uncertain, and there is this “will he”, “wont he” talk.

      Its time for Costello to finally take a risk. Either put up or shut up.

    • Mark B says:

      09:07am | 15/06/09

      I suspect that the politic reality is that Labor and Liberals know Mr Turnbull can’t win and by late 2010 that will be obvious to all. Therefore Mr Costello is under pressure to declare his leadership intentions and transition soon to give his colleaugues some small hope. Mr Costello knows that he probably couldn’t win but another defeat would give him the mandate to refresh the party AND finish off Mr Turnbull. Mr Costello, love him or not, is a long standing political force. He was undermined by his former boss to the detriment of the party, he was undermined by Mr Turnbull from the day Mr Turnbull entered parliament, and he was let down by his stupid colleagues. Now they are begging his return to centre stage. He should give them all the Aussie salute and do what he wants to do in his own good time.

    • MX says:

      09:12am | 15/06/09

      he’ll be back and when turnbull screws up, he’ll be there to take the reigns

    • Yabba says:

      09:31am | 15/06/09

      Nah, he should stay there for as long as possible. The longer he stays there, the longer the Libs will be in opposition.

    • Bill Macartney says:

      09:47am | 15/06/09

      Surely the thing we want most from our politicians is a passion to make a difference for the people of Australia. Where is there even a teensy hint of being truly committed to making a difference to the people of Australia in Costello’s behaviour since the election. If he was truly committed he would have jumped in ages ago. It’s time for Pete to shoot through!

    • Mark B says:

      09:54am | 15/06/09

      It is a mistake I believe, to connect the Opposition debt and deficit campaign with the recent poll result. In my view the poll highlighted the general concern about the economy and the large debt number, but the government strategy is widely supported, and the concern will soften if the economy recovers early in 2010. Mr Turnbull is a ring-in, transparently ambitious, and politically naiive. After the election loss, Mr Costello could claim the leadership, blame John Howard for everything the Liberals did wrong, including their profligate spending, and claim he is the steady economic hand who delivers lower tax cuts as per his record. With Mr Costello victory in 2013 is possible, with anyone else its a long shot. I think this is what will happen.

    • iansand says:

      11:00am | 15/06/09

      In a contest between a politician’s ego and party or public interest put your money on the ego every time.

    • Oscar Zeta says:

      11:28am | 15/06/09

      Costello would make a better leader than Turnbull, and a far better Liberal Prime Minister. Malcolm Turnbull will share a page with Latham in Australian Political History 101 as one of the great couldhavebeens; possessed of sharp wit, immaculate, immovable hair and dense, round vowels, Turnbull should have been a great conservative hero; chopping at taxes and Government in equal measure, fighting the Hun overseas, and hacking at the Unions at home. Instead, we’re left with a mincing, shadow of a Tory, boot firmly planted in each camp, incapable of original thought, or heaven forbid, a legitimately Liberal thought - it’s as if he doesn’t know which Party he’s in sometimes.

      Costello, on the other hand, although a political coward, is consistent. A classical liberal. His constant tax cuts were the persistent middle finger at the big spending, populist Howard. I mean, I love Howard like my own father, but if he were to have been fully let loose, he would have raised taxes and tripled the size of the bureaucracy over night. And Costello has a legitimate charm, unlike the affected Turnbull, Costello has always been capable of great, unscripted moments. Sadly for Cossie, he’s done his dash now, Costello Watching has become a national passtime and if he were to be made leader, I suspect the commentariat would grow bored and start speculating on something else. That leaves Hockey. Who might as well be in the ALP for all the good he’s done his Party’s ideological base. Pyne? No one votes for a bloodnut, and Liberal voters especially associate gingers with the Mark of Cain. Abbot? While as PM he might accidently lead us into Armageddon, he would be a great Opposition Leader.

    • Jeremy says:

      11:29am | 15/06/09

      The authors appear not to understand that it is good for the country to have more than one person of talent in a political party. the purpose of parliament is to have a pool of talented people, who , from time to time, decide who should lead and who should have various responsibilities. For the countrys sake every effort should be made to retain a person of Costellos obvious ability in the parliament. If for no other reason than as a reserve in case of injury to the on-field players.

    • Mark B says:

      11:33am | 15/06/09

      Finally, I am suspicious that the almost hysterical reaction in the last week to the PM’s use of colloquialisms emanates from Liberal Party private polling showing concerns about the authenticity of Mr Turnbull. If it looks and sounds like a dog-whistle, it probably is one, and journalists are clearly finding it difficult to come up with relevant commentary. But as Dr Henry would say, “it won’t work”.

    • Dave K says:

      11:39am | 15/06/09

      The only reason he’s still there is because no one in the private sector would have him. He would have been out of there in a flash if macbank had offered him a cushy job.

    • Henry says:

      12:02pm | 15/06/09

      Costello will nominate, Turnbull will lose the federal election, Costello will become leader of the opposition in 2010- And the rest is up to the people of Australia.

    • Johnny says:

      12:04pm | 15/06/09

      The world has moved on.  Right-wing wing nuts have been exposed as the carpet baggers they always were.

      For him to pretend that somehow the minerals boom and then bust had no influence on our economy displays a contempt for our intelligence.

    • realto says:

      12:17pm | 15/06/09

      Eric: I’m not a particular fan of either Costello nor the coalition. I think he should stay because having him there is destabilising the coalition and making a 2010 win less likely. Assuming a coalition loss in 2010 though I’d be less resistant to the idea of a coalition win in 2013 so if Costello was still around and considered leadership material, by all mean he should have a crack at it. I don’t think he has the ticker to either challenge now or bide his time though. He’ll go in 2010.

    • Robert Smissen says:

      12:30pm | 15/06/09

      HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, does anyone else smell a rodent? ? The Labor party want Mr. Costello to go, so common sense says that he should stay. Possible future scenario, Little Kevvy will wind the next election with a vastly reduced majority, Julia will stage a successful coup, prove beyond doubt that her unworkable Fabianist ideas are disastrous for our country & leaving The Honorable Mr. Peter Costello to step in to save Australia from heading irrevocably down the road to perdition.

    • James says:

      01:05pm | 15/06/09

      Tim Gartrell says Costello has been a 14 year distraction and source of division that has helped Labor?
      How does he explain that 11 of those 14 years have been in Government, with Costello taking a leading role in the defeat of the Keating Govt and was Treasurer for all of the years of the Howard Government?

    • Daphon says:

      02:22pm | 15/06/09

      Costello has announced he is standing down at the next election.

      Good riddance.

    • Mark B says:

      02:45pm | 15/06/09

      Well, well, well. The Libs have lost their best talent and Labor will be popping champage corks for a month. Good luck to him.

    • Phil Willis says:

      02:46pm | 15/06/09

      The thing about leadership is that you actually have to lead.You know, like, get out in front, take a stand and lead.

      Peter Costello’s only qualification would be for a followership position in the liberal party.

    • Grover says:

      03:06pm | 15/06/09

      I understand Dollar Sweets will be putting out a new line - Costello Melts.

    • Henry says:

      05:07pm | 15/06/09

      Oops…..

      Guess I was wrong about Costello taking the leadership. He’s resigning.

      But us Liberals will be in oposition untill atleast 2013, nonetheless, unfortunately.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter