After a week when the Liberals took decisive action to reduce their political footprint Joe Hockey is sitting snugly between ‘Someone Else’ and ‘Don’t Know’ as the preferred Liberal leader.

Joe Hockey gives the thumbs up yesterday after having lunch at his Hunters Hill home with frontbench colleague and possible deputy leadership candidate Peter Dutton.

If politics really is Hollywood for ugly people, then this week’s Essential Report shows Joe is about to slip on the political swimsuit and start strutting his stuff by default.

The polling confirms what we all supected – the nation is over Malcolm Turnbull, it can’t abide Tony Abbott and it doesn’t really know who Julie Bishop or Andrew Robb are. As for Kevin Andrews, like his own party, we didn’t bother to ask. This leaves just three credible options for the Liberals: Don’t Know, Someone Else and Joe Hockey.

Which of the following do you think would make the best leader of the Liberal Party?
Best Liberal leader? Hockey in a canter.

Let’s deal with these three options in detail.

Don’t Know – this is the position the Liberals have been trialling for the past week. It works like this. You call a party room meeting and offer the MC job to Wilson Tuckey.  You hand the conch around the room and let debate continue for eight hours. You nearly miss question time. When a few people leave the room you determine the issue in your favour without a vote. Then you roll your leader. When someone sensibly asks, who is running the show? The answer is clear: Don’t Know.

Someone Else – As opposed to the rudder-less ranks of the ‘Don’t Know’ backers, those promoting Someone Else at least agree they need to have an individual running the Party Room, their only problem is that they individual they want is yet to be born.  On current evidence, this person needs to be able to embrace climate change while denying its existence, sound the dog whistle on refugees while embracing the economic opportunities in the region and be able to lie down with an array of rabid canines without getting fleas. 

Joe Hockey – As we wait for these advances in genetic technology, there is our man Joe.

Points for Joe:

- He doesn’t actually want the job. The Liberal leadership now fits into the Catch-22 frame – if you are mad enough to want this job, then you are too crazy to be a serious contender. Hockey genuinely appears to sane enough to pass this threshold.

- He comes across as a decent bloke – the basis of his public name recognition is the old Sunrise love-in with his old sparring mate Kev. The idea of turning the national political debate in a breakfast news show hosted my Mel and Kochie appeals to many. Maybe we can reach agreement on an ETS through a other bonding hike – maybe out across Greenland’s melting glaciers.
- It will be great for cartoonists – there is nothing like a big man with a disproportionately small head to make us chuckle.
- It will be great for headline writers – Australia has never had a leader whose surname is an Olympic sport. Just wait for the convergence - if he’s caught kissing someone – tonsil Hockey; if he’s giving someone the cold shoulder – ice hockey; if he is reducing emissions – air hockey (Scrap that last one, it will never happen).

Points against Joe

- He comes across as a decent bloke - it was noted during the Oceanic Viking stand-off that Turnbull was just not racist enough to run a credible scare campaign. It is a character trait that could hamstrung Joe as well.

- The poor fella has three pre-school aged kids. Once he gets through managing the chaos in the house and cleaning up the mess of a bunch of fractious trouble-makers still in nappies, he will just not have the energy to meet his domestic duties.

- Like 74 per cent of the population, Hockey believes it is important to address climate change. At some point – either before or after Copenhagen - he will be forced to choose between the mainstream and the flakes in his party room. Either way, he will be disappointing people.

- He is a large man who perspires when under pressure (witness his string of sodden WorkChoices appearances in the dying days of the Howard regime). The Liberals created the playbook for campaigning against size XXX with the Beazley ‘no-ticker’ assault. One way or the other, Joe faces becoming the Biggest Loser.

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eno says:

      01:43pm | 30/11/09

      - The poor fella has three pre-school aged kids. Once he gets through managing the chaos in the house and cleaning up the mess of a bunch of fractious trouble-makers still in nappies, he will just not have the energy to meet his domestic duties.

      That’s my favourite joke of the week - nice article..

    • Angry Punter says:

      02:03pm | 30/11/09

      Where did Kevvy Andrews come in the Essential Research poll?  I don’t want to give up hope - Kevin 2007 vs Kevin 1907 would be a mouth-watering prospect.  Two of the most inspiring men on the planet ...

    • Andrew says:

      02:03pm | 30/11/09

      (Forgive me)

      Pity Costello is not still available…. perhaps he was also too smart to want the job…. though I personally think his futures fund is just another way to ‘tax’ the people as well (where else does the increase - interest - come from?)

    • Big Banana says:

      02:17pm | 30/11/09

      Re: Realist.
      You are putting alot of faith in a Daily Telegraph online poll. 65% of the people who would respond to an online poll may not think climate change is happening but I reckon you’d get a similar answer if you asked about the existence of little green men from Mars.

    • TheTruthHurts says:

      02:42pm | 30/11/09

      I didn’t realise Green voters made up 33% of the voting population.

      Nice spin on the numbers though, keep up the good work.

    • Darren says:

      03:17pm | 30/11/09

      is Stephen Bradbury popular with Liberal voters because they know what a dud he would be as leader?

    • AJ says:

      03:25pm | 30/11/09

      @TheTruthHurts:

      They’re not 33%, however, they’re over 13% of the population (you know, roughly equivalent to Turnbull’s rating as preferred PM), and significantly more in some crucial vulnerable seats.  Ergo, their opinions are something worth testing.  It ain’t spin, it’s relevant information.

    • Picohloh says:

      03:51pm | 30/11/09

      Sydney has had its dryest November in forty five years and we are set for a really hot summer. And we have to make sure that the science is on the mark.
      The attitudes and delusions of the climate change deniers remind me of Louis MacNeice’s lines in 1938 as war approached :

      “The glass is falling hour by hour, the glass will fall forever,
      But if you break the bloody glass you won’t hold up the weather.”

      Say it isn’t so, Joe. We won’‘t have to give up things, will we?

    • Dino says:

      03:55pm | 30/11/09

      Maybe the Libs can take a forward to the past approach and clone Menzies to be their leader. Or perhaps if they wish hard enough Holt will emerge from the surf to resume his leadership duties. It is hard not to find this all very amusing as the Liberal party self destructs. Perhaps Steve Bradbury would be a good choice. At least he knows how to take advantage when the rest of the field shoots themselves in the foot.

    • cats says:

      04:19pm | 30/11/09

      @Realist

      Lol if you think the Daily Telegraph shows the accurate view of every Australian. A huge amount of people who sit on news websites and argue all day are passionate skeptics and right wingers. The people who do believe that man has made contributions to Climate Change are out there doing things to prevent it, instead of sitting here argueing about it. I still find it funny how much you right wingers love pollution.

    • TheTruthHurts says:

      05:11pm | 30/11/09

      AJ, hate to break it to you but last election they were less than 8%.

      The numbers Peter has posted are deceptive because it pretends Green voters are actually relevent and make up 33% of the population and has unevenly weighted the numbers to skew the actual results by doing a pathetic average of the 3 results.

      Even if we took your laughable 13% number the Total would still be much different.

      Greens voters are probably never going to vote coalition as they are a far leftwing party, so if we eliminate them entirely we get the following:

      Joe Hockey = 27%
      Turnbull =    17%
      Abbott   =      10%
      Bishop   =      6%
      Robb     =      2%
      Someone Else = 17%
      Don’t know =      20%

    • Faye Corin says:

      05:34pm | 30/11/09

      Please Joe, No ETS. for us, PLease take the leadeership and let commonsense prevail. DO WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO. Sorry, I KNOW YOU HAVE A YOUNG FAMILY BUT who else will stop this madness?

    • Ricky Collins says:

      05:37pm | 30/11/09

      Joe, its up to you now -Please step in and save Australia.  Do you know how many of us ordinary people are against this? Please stop the ETS

    • acotrel says:

      05:48pm | 30/11/09

      The Libs are not very smart! Trying to use Joe Hockey to try and topple his mate is offensive to most of us onlookers. The whole debacle within the Liberal Party is far too public for them to get into their usual sneaky stuff. This time their poisonous politics will backfire big time!

    • Faul Kinell says:

      06:16pm | 30/11/09

      Yes come on Joe we’re all looking forward to your lovely big smile, you know the one like when you were the Work Choices Salesman.
      “Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am!”

    • TLC says:

      06:22pm | 30/11/09

      Once traitor is always a traitor.
      No one will trust you again.
      We are very disappointed with you Joe.
      Those are the darkest, sad times for us.

    • Peter Lewis says:

      06:58pm | 30/11/09

      For the record there is nothing tricky about the party breakdown. Just count down and not sideways.
      What the story here is that there is no real preferred option for libs - but Joe is clearly their least imperfect option.
      For all you conspiracy theorists the numbers are what they are.

    • M Cooke says:

      10:29pm | 30/11/09

      I will have Mr Abbott, at least we may see some sparks flying in Question Time , I did like Mr Turnbull but all he does is sit there like a stale bottle of piss when he should be attacking Rudd over this ETS scam , open borders, billions wasted that’s why he looked suss and more and more like a Labor plant whats the big rush trying to push through the fresh air tax , THE MAJORITY OF AUSTRALIANS DO NOT WANT ETS .

    • CJ says:

      09:48am | 01/12/09

      I think you need another option in the poll: None of the Above.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter