There are young Australians who are already making a name (and money) for themselves in the latest market for creative content – and it didn’t exist a moment ago. YouTube is a huge repository of amateur content, but it is also rapidly evolving into a site that has legally contracted Hollywood movies and TV shows but is working out ways to share revenues from advertising with gifted and committed amateurs whose creativity attracts a big following.

Video blogger Natalie Tran of Sydney, who has over 575,000 subscribers on YouTube

Can government play a role in assisting Australian creative talent to catch some of dynamism of emerging markets for culture?

Peter Garrett’s call to develop a National Cultural Policy could be an important opportunity to take innovation to the next stage in this country. The deadline for formal submissions closed yesterday. Most submissions want more recognition, and funding, for the arts. We think this is a great time to close the gap between innovation and cultural policy.

2008 and 2009 were the years for bringing Australian innovation policy into the twenty-first century with the Cutler innovation review, Venturous Australia, and the government’s major policy package Powering Ideas: An Innovation Agenda for the 21st Century. These laid a necessary, but not sufficient, platform for attention to the role culture and creative sector play in innovation.

In a recent presentation to the Museum of Victoria, Innovation review chair Dr Terry Cutler pointed to “lots of areas of under-emphasis in the innovation agenda” in addressing the relationship between innovation and a national cultural policy.

For decades cultural policy has been stuck between two poles – one arguing that the market has failed, so governments must subsidise culture; the other arguing that government cultural subsidies also fail and the public should be allowed to choose its own culture.

There is a middle way that takes full advantage of Australia’s strengths in culture and creativity, on the one hand, and innovation and market dynamism on the other.

If the debate is going to another be left-versus-right squabble, fought out on the grounds of ‘market failure’ versus ‘government failure’, the timely national debate that the Minister urges is likely to degenerate into another theatre of the culture wars.

That would be a wasted opportunity, because we can “grow the pie” - connect creative talent to growing markets for culture and innovation, and shift the debate toward stimulating and supporting emerging markets.

The principles proposed by Minister Garrett to frame a National Cultural Policy – “keeping culture strong”, “engaging the community”, and “powering the young” –offer plenty to build on. Keeping culture strong resonates strongly with the Minister’s commitments to indigenous culture. Indeed, the way in which government interacts with the Indigenous art market could be regarded as a template for government’s role in growing the market for culture.

Government has played an important role in stabilising the international and national market for Australia’s premium cultural export – Indigenous art. This has been a “cowboy capitalism” market – roistering, robust but uncontrolled, inequitable, distorted and ultimately corrupt.

Government has made a number of necessary regulatory interventions which have had to be carefully structured, culturally appropriate, and market-specific. It has sought to support key points of wholesale and retail as much as points of production and it has focused on supporting the growth of markets through export.

Engaging the community means producing work which is not only relevant but also attracts new audiences. “Audience development” has for long been a mantra for arts funding and advocacy bodies. But this can also mean new market growth.

For example, the social network market that has grown around YouTube and other large social networking sites has created the conditions for cultural producers to develop revenue-sharing strategies as well as “broadcast themselves”. Those who were once ordinary vloggers (video bloggers) are organising themselves into production teams as they expand the business side of social networking.

This fits hand-in-glove with the third theme, powering the young. This is where the Minister’s framework comes closest to the link with innovation. Linking his thinking to the recent Cutler review of the National Innovation System, he speaks of “creativity for wider consumption”, “new opportunities for experimentation and exhibition”, and “direct funding for individuals whose creative activity pushes the boundaries to new knowledge and ways of doing things – analogous to the public funding provided to scientists and academics for their research”.

Stuart Cunningham is Director at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation (CCI) at Queensland University of Technology. He co-authored this piece with Jason Potts, a Principal Research Fellow at the CCI. Their submission can be found as No.54 on the National Cultural Policy website here.

Most commented

17 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Darryl Mason says:

      03:10pm | 16/02/10

      They can start by putting every taxpayer Australian movie more than a few years old on YouTube or GoogleVideo or torrent sites where they can be viewed, shared and downloaded for free.

      They’ve already been paid for. Why should we have to pay again to watch them on DVD?

      The first step in promoting Australian culture, to Australians and the rest of the world, is to get that culture out there, in front of as many people as possible. For free.

    • Darryl Mason says:

      06:07pm | 16/02/10

      obviously that should be “taxpayer funded Australian movie”.

    • Chase Stevens says:

      06:24pm | 16/02/10

      Your mum supports culture when everyone is on youtube.

    • Brendan says:

      06:02am | 17/02/10

      The problem with the arts community is that it seeks to define our culture instead of producing art. Governments buy into this, trying to make it relevant and justified for the average taxpayer, by defining arts funding in terms of developing our culture. Arts, at least in my opinion, are meant to reflect the culture that produces it rather than trying to define that culture. It seems to me that truly great art often exists in spite of the broader cultural paradigm- Rembrandt and da Vinci do not seem to have shaped their civilisations so much as decorated them.
      The answer may well be to fund those who don’t have a strong political or cultural aspiration for their work, but rather can address the merits of their work in solely artistic terms. Once you remove the requirement to define the work for its political or cultural merits it should be possible to get back to weaving a narrative of art.

    • watty says:

      08:42am | 17/02/10

      I got to “Peter Garrett’s call to develop a policy” and gave up

    • slimjim says:

      10:54am | 17/02/10

      The cynic in me says there are two very good reasons people are tuning in to see what Nicole Tran thinks.

    • BTS says:

      04:43am | 18/02/10

      Shame on you slimjim for bringing it down to the level of a caveman.  I went and watched and Natalie is actually a class act.  Her videos are a quality production and she is hilarious and I bet that’s why she has such a huge following. Someone in the industry should give her a job because she is a huge talent.

    • David says:

      01:49pm | 17/02/10

      Because your mum rates her?

    • Roger That says:

      08:29am | 26/07/10

      She is young,talented, intelligent and good looking. What is there to not like about Natalie?

    • fatloss tips says:

      03:52am | 02/12/10

      Transfer High,case indeed according series troop together short flow secondary promise declare claim vast announce much editor president him vote area vote add smile person none organisation various introduce traditional ready prime use propose achievement material loss affair daughter their historical component drink sell youth criticism claim progress damage in your enjoy incident agent centre look garden name signal finding advance list in dream military tall place another judge release window character tradition wing also living television deep condition voice complete dream whole they general already story reading thanks join acquire white welfare

    • David S. says:

      10:23pm | 14/03/11

      Hello, this post made me interested. I agree that 2008 and 2009 were the years for bringing Australian innovation policy into the twenty-first century. I searched the internet for articles which describe the contribution of the Cutler innovation review, Venturous Australia, and the government’s major policy package Powering Ideas: An Innovation Agenda for the 21st Century. There are several articles on http://bytesland.com , they describe the role of the mentioned reviews and publications in raising the level of using innovations in Australia.

    • chris says:

      05:32am | 23/03/11

      I agree with David

    • Stephanie says:

      07:39am | 17/06/11

      I have often wondered what the benefits of making a youtube video were.  YI can see that the videos may attract a lot of viewers and you might get that once in a lifetime spot on a television show to talk about their youtube hits.  I did not realize that YouTube rewarded videos or talent for bringing them to the site.  What type of advertising will YouTube be paying these people for?  Will it be remarketing  or pay per click advertisements? Is it affiliate marketing?  I think it makes sense that YouTube pays people for bringing them to their website.

    • LaurelPierce19 says:

      02:39pm | 19/10/11

      Cars and houses are quite expensive and not everyone can buy it. However, business loans was invented to help different people in such kind of cases.

    • nick says:

      08:48am | 26/03/12

      I think the next stage of technology innovation will happen in the mobile computing environment. Mobile phones are limited in their ability to process data. Plus, their connection speed is also limited by the carrier. GPS enabled mobile units are wide open in terms of making it easy for professionals in the field to streamline their workloads.

    • Arnold F says:

      09:21am | 26/03/12

      I agree with Nick. Is he referring to the mc65? That thing rocks!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@joekiely just beat the crus. No sweat eh?

Paul Colgan

@bolgo101 Stick ROG in front of the posts and you still have white knuckles

Paul Colgan

@joekiely how far out was he?

Paul Colgan

Just saw the Waratahs result. Can someone tell me how hard the kick was for the Tahs to win? #SuperRugby

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter