It was the line that brokered the ceasefire of the century: “Let’s declare peace in this phony war and go back to focus on the substance.”


With that simple sentence came a halt in the so-called “mummy wars” between working and non-working mothers - just as a fresh bucket of kero had been dumped on the embers this month by campaigning US politicians and their media-savvy wives.

This olive branch was delivered by Democratic consultant and working mother Hilary Rosen by way of apology to Ann Romney, Republican candidate Mitt Romney’s wife and a stay-at-home mother to five. Rosen had controversially accused Mrs Romney of “not having worked a day in her life”. Naturally, an online skirmish followed, with plenty of publicity smart-bombs.

Good old Roseanne Barr even stuck her oar in, saying “I call bullshit on that, girlfriend” to Ann Romney’s claim that she did it all herself when her children were little, apart from a few hours’ help a week from a cleaner. Barr suggested the cleaner be found and asked about her hours, and won priceless TV coverage with that.

In the comment streams on opinion sites and women’s blogs, the reaction to this so-called outbreak of “nasty mums at war” got stabby enough to hit the papers. And who can blame the headline writers. It’s a pretty catchy phrase, what with all those visions of flying mobile phones and half-full bottles of defrosted breast milk, silk-blouse/apron ripping and mass manicure destruction.

When someone calls a “mummy war”, the internet explodes.

But hold on a minute. To borrow from Barr, I’d just like to call “bullshit” on this whole idea, and say that out here in Australia in the real world, handy headline-grabbers aside, there really is no “mummy war” to speak of.

These bitchfights over definitions may make eye-catching copy (of course non-working mothers “work”). But even the term “mummy wars”, so obnoxiously patronising to all mothers, is also so outdated as to have lost relevance or meaning to the multi-tasking, part-time or from home, sometimes working/sometimes not, job-sharing, or mumpreneur/eBay micro business queen, or not-working-but-madly-volunteering mothers of my generation.

Sure, when feminism delivered women their first opportunity to dive into the corporate world - full time, long hours, few exceptions - it caused a social ripple. Those first working women really were forced to choose between working like men and effectively giving up their chance to spend any magic time raising their little kids, or not working. There was little in between.

And sure, this must have been as confronting to the women “left behind” in traditional roles as it was to many of those first-wave working women. And from what I’ve read, this whole, tired “mommy wars” tag dates back to all that.

But now, as the workforce continues to catch up to reality, decent part-time work exists and even Tony Abbott is talking about home-based child carers (nannies!) being subsidised, many women have real choices .... mummy wars? What mummy wars?

I certainly didn’t notice any when I was a part time working-from-home mother, or a working mother on a year’s maternity leave. Nor when I was a full time stay-at-home mum (helping out at school and often taking home some kid or other for a friend with a big job).

I didn’t spend my non-working days thinking “damn you (insert name of guilty working mother here), for your selfish lifestyle choice and lack of diligence at mothering”.

And in the four years since I’ve been back to largely office-based work - often having one or another of my children brought home by a stay-at-home friend, or recently being bailed out with a brand new school shirt on the first day of “winter uniform” by a non-working mum who was more organised than me - I’m still unaware of any real-world mummy warring.

It seems to me that in these weird, fluid times, when there are financial imperatives for women to resume some kind of work but also more choices, we have realised that what we mothers have in common is we’re all just doing our best, and muddling through.

To suggest that “working” and “non-working” mothers cannot relate to each other is not only stupid, but wrong. And to suggest they disrespect each other’s choices (or disapprove of steps taken by necessity) is just as bad.

Certainly, we must admit that as with every other platform of contemporary communication, there exists a bunch of vocal “mummy trolls” (the epithet given to people who say hideous things, anonymously, online). And when it suits manipulative politicians to try to fan resentment, for their own purposes, old wounds can still be opened - especially when your audience is whole communities of tired women.

I reckon what she wanted was a class war, but in the end the one thing mummy-battling Hilary Rosen got right is that this whole debate is phoney. So, let’s be done with it.

Most commented

36 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Caroline says:

      07:45am | 28/04/12

      Hear hear!!!  I am so glad you wrote this.  I get so upset at the suggestion women are constantly at war with each other…I have never felt anything but loved and supported by my beautiful girlfriends.  My husband is completely aware that his entire social life revolves around the ‘girls’ organising get togethers with the blokes happily tagging along for the ride.  In my wide group of friends we range from stay at home mums (who wouldn’t swap it for the world), part time, full time, shift workers and girls who do the books at home for their husbands business.  I work full time and sometimes get very sad in the school holidays when my girlfriends are having beach days ... but I never feel judged and I never judge.  It’s about time we wasted a little more newsprint celebrating female relationships because you ask my husband, they’re what makes the world go round!!

    • AdamC says:

      08:48am | 28/04/12

      To be fair, the Ann Romney stuff was more about class war than mummy war. Class warfare is the basis of the Dems’ election strategy. That stupid Democrat talking head just misunderstood the memo.

      Anyway, I agree that the mummy wars are largely a myth, at least for the younger generations. My baby boomer mother, however, does sometimes feel a little short-changed from balancing a professional career - which itself was stunted by working part-time for many years - with motherhood. This sometimes manifests itself as resentment towards women who stayed at home and look after their children. 

      Or, to be more specific, women who could afford to stay and home and still maintain a nice lifestyle because hubby was a hot-shot lawyer or high-flying executive. That is the rub: most mums who work do so out of perceived financial necessity. Others may genuinely want to put their career ahead of caring duties, but they are a minority. (I seem to recall some research on this subject a few years back that kinda hit a nerve with the feminist social engineers.)

      So maybe all mummy war is really class war, as work-and-family jugglers resent their friends whose husbands earn enough to allow them the choice to stay at home. For the jugglers, choice in the matter is often illusory.

    • Working mum says:

      09:32am | 28/04/12

      What a patronising attitude to women. I didn’t realise the ultimate achievement was to marry, breed and stay at home to maintain a nice lifestyle. Gosh, if I had done that I would never have met the thousands of people I have through work, would not have travelled, my children would not have had many of the experience they have had and I wouldn’t have met some of my closest and dearest friends. I expect my brain would have atrophied as well.

    • AdamC says:

      01:39pm | 28/04/12

      Working mum, I wasn’t being patronising. I was just explaining what I see as the neglected reality of this issue: many women work because they have to, not as an expression of their personal values.

      I have no problem with women making the choices that suit them, whatever they are. Some women, however, seem somewhat insecure in their choices, and view someone making a different choice as a personal affront to them. Dare I say it, Working mum, your response to my comment suggests you may be one of those women!

    • BJ says:

      01:54pm | 28/04/12

      I would like to thank working mum for reminding us of the smug attitudes and malicious misinterpretation that made the mummy wars so heated.

    • Mayday says:

      03:01pm | 28/04/12

      @ Adam C I think you have hit the nail on the head.

      @ Working mum you are the one patronising. 
      Travel and meeting thousands of people through work, this may explain why you like being a working mum but for the bulk of working mums the job is a drudge that pays the bills and occasionally gives us time out.

    • Lesley Crane says:

      09:48am | 28/04/12

      Sorry,  working mothers have it harder,  we still have the house wife duties to manage whilst ALSO caring for the kids and working too.  There was never a competition because it’s obvious who has the harder job…The End

    • Rachel says:

      02:28pm | 28/04/12

      I think that you’re probably a troll,  but I’ll put in my two cents anyway. I’ve been a stay at home mother and a working mother and I prefer working because it is easier and more stimulating. For me, that is. I can go to work, do one thing at a time, talk to adults and be appreciated. Also, when you are working eight hour days, there isn’t as much cleaning, cooking or child caring required. It’s not as it all gets left for you to do when you get home. Someone else does that while I’m at work, and I’m OK with that.
      But, back on point, I have never been aware of being judged personally for my choices, I have never judged others, and I don’t care about being judged by mummy trolls.

    • Felicity says:

      02:35pm | 28/04/12

      I agree. I don’t know how full time working mums do it. The only ones I know who manage have live in nannies (usually a family member, eg a parent). Then again, I don’t know how stay at home mums do it either. I think I would go mad. I am hoping to work part time when we have a family, luckily my workplace allows it in my job. It seems like a good balance. I was wondering though if this creates a 3rd category - stay at home vs part time working vs full time working mums.

    • BJ says:

      10:56am | 29/04/12

      @Leslie

      The ABS time use survey says different. Australian men do much less homework than Australian women on average. However, on average men also do much more paid work. In total, Australian men do more work than Australian women.

    • Daniel says:

      09:59am | 28/04/12

      Every time someone makes a judgement about the way a woman raises her kids there is an explosion of comment. Mommy trolling is the easiest of all.

    • kitteh says:

      01:44pm | 28/04/12

      One easy way to unite most SAH and working mothers - mention women that are voluntarily childfree. It’s been my experience that both groups trash them with gleeful abandon.

    • Gina says:

      02:31pm | 28/04/12

      Absolutely! I am 25 and do not have children (yet) but get hounded by mothers all the time that I must have kids. Yet they then go on to talk about how awful it is (sleep deprivation, no money, no time to yourself), which scares me off the whole thing, it’s so confusing! I am on the fence about it, and that creates hurtful comments about how could I possibly question the decision. I can’t imagine how many hate comments people who choose to not have kids get. Funny thing is, I couldn’t care less if people have kids or not (same as their sexual preferences, career choices, religious beliefs etc), but for some reason they take it as a personal insult if I don’t?

    • Captain Delta says:

      09:46am | 29/04/12

      I have received some pretty messed up comments from others due to my choice to remain childfree forever. Mostly to do with being very selfish for not wanting children and that I will no doubt change my mind one day. It annoys me but whatever.
      The comment that actually does rile me is the one that I received from friend of a friend. She explained that I will never understand true joy, love and compassion until I have a child. Excuse me! I said to her that if she can not accept that everyone is different and able to experience love and joy from other sources, then this apparent compassion that only a mother has is seriously questionable.

    • zelly says:

      11:40am | 29/04/12

      Yeah i love being selfish for not having kids.  for not having kids by myself when i was younger, when i wanted them, but there was no father in sight?  for not having them now that i consider myself too old? for not forcing my crazy husband into something that he doesn’t want?  for not bringing more children into an already uncertain and overpopulated world?  yeah i’m real selfish.

      i’m also really happy.  and i know true love because not only am the wife of an awesome bloke, but i have a dog and nephews.  and no kids.  thank god.

    • Anne71 says:

      12:35pm | 30/04/12

      Exactly what I was thinking, kitteh.  Child-free women are the universal punching bag for working and non-working parents. Apparently we are all selfish, career-obsessed child-haters who deserve to die alone.

    • Iggy says:

      05:21pm | 28/04/12

      @Gina - the only time I have an issue with childfree women is when they tell ne they hate children or when they tell me how awful having children is. How can someone say something is awful without experiencing it (reasonable exceptions to thos rule of course)

    • s101 says:

      08:20am | 29/04/12

      Iggy, totally agree.
      I have 2 sisters in law, both childless not by choice. One is forever rubbishing ‘breeders’, gives my 2 year old filthy looks (even though she rarely sees us or her niece) and basically carries on about babies and small kids like they were vermin.
      The other (childless) SIL goes on about how inconvenient/awful/annoying/time consuming/stressful having children is. Both of them give childless women a bad name.
      To be honest, the pair of them need counselling.

    • Gina says:

      11:11am | 29/04/12

      Iggy, I can totally understand that. I myself don’t mind kids, they can be really lovely and quite funny, though they have their moments! I am trying to get an idea of what being a parent will be like, unfortunately 90% of what I hear is negative (no sleep, no money etc) and the rest is either condescending (eg before I had kids I had no idea what love was etc) or genuinely nice (there’s nothing to describe watching them grow etc). It’s a tough decision to make as once you go there, you can’t go back to being childless!

    • Lilly says:

      01:26pm | 29/04/12

      So they should have kids and then decide they don’t like it… yeah, great plan. News flash, not everyone likes kids. Deal with it.

    • nostradamus says:

      05:30pm | 28/04/12

      Will the survivors of the Mummy Wars be able to get RSL Club Badges and march in the Anzac Day March ? Or will they have to wait like the Vietnam War Veterans who had to wait decades to get recognition of their war services??

    • nostradamus says:

      05:34pm | 28/04/12

      Who won the Mummy Wars ? My TAB Bet depends on knowing this!

    • willie says:

      07:28pm | 28/04/12

      Dear author,
      A troll is not someone who says nasty things online. A troll is a person who says something purely to get a reaction.  For example if you actually know what trolling is and only wrongly explained it to get this type of reaction you would be a troll. This is despite you being neither nasty nor anonymous.
      The more you know.

    • Stella says:

      07:53pm | 28/04/12

      In this day and age, staying at home and being a ‘full time mum’ is lazy, and worse, it is soul destroying. You can happily juggle a job as well as be a good mum, and those who claim otherwise on either side of the fence are full of it.

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      12:29am | 29/04/12

      Stella, I struggle to believe you are a parent, if you are I bet you’re a rubbish one. As a parent & working too, it is always a struggle

    • marley says:

      08:45am | 29/04/12

      @Stella - it’s this kind of judgmentalism that is the bane of today’s society.  Not every woman finds staying at home with the kids to be “soul destroying,”  or at least no more so than doing a meaningless 9 to 5 job. 

      As for being lazy, there are stay at home mums out there that work their butts off, nurturing and educating their kids, looking after the home, getting meals on the table, volunteering.  When kids are pre-school, parenting is pretty much a full time job:  otherwise, you wouldn’t need to send your kids to day care or have granny or the neighbour look after them if you do decide to get a jobe..  Women who choose to look after their kids themselves rather than pay someone to do it are not “lazy” - they have just decided to work with their kids rather than with a cash register at the local supermarket.

      Yes, you can juggle a job and be a good mom:  no one is suggesting otherwise.  There’s nothing wrong at all with being a working mom, and quite often it’s necessary for the family finances.  And if you have a career rather than just a job, it can be fulfilling as well.  But it doesn’t make you superior to a woman who has made different choices.

    • Sarah says:

      11:11am | 29/04/12

      Troll! Right here is one example of those people you mention in your article.

    • SalC says:

      09:47am | 29/04/12

      Baby no. 1 is due soon.  I’d love to stay at home, rather than go back to my shit job, but am having serious concerns about whether we could afford on one income, and whether I’ll be forced back into paid drudgery.  Decisions, decisions.

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      06:10pm | 29/04/12

      If you can run 1 car & cut down on all the expenses, make more meals from scratch, you’d be amazed how much you can save. No child minding costs etc, I knew a couple that worked it out that they were only $87 a week better off when they considered ALL the costs. Your baby will love you for staying home. Do you really want a stranger on minimum wage spend more of your childs waking hour with them than you, not to mention the “germ bombs” that people leave at creches & can’t be contacted?

    • Thetruthwouldn'thurt says:

      04:00pm | 29/04/12

      There are judgemental people out there, there always will be. But the majority of people live and let live, it’s just that usually the rotten ones speak the loudest.

      In my working mother life, I didn’t have anyone at home doing the housey jobs for me. No, they waited till I got home. Then when I became a single parent, working full time, it all fell 100% to me. Not nice. I would have much preferred to be there for my kids. But hey, we deal with our lives as they happen. Now I’m lucky enough to be a part-time, work from home Mum and couldn’t be happier with the arrangement. Now I have the patience to do the things that need to be done. Including teach my kids the value of housework!

      If one thing suited everyone, the world would be in trouble. Those of you who judge really ought to get a life and stop looking at other people.

    • sha says:

      05:47am | 30/04/12

      4 children and multiple career incarnations later at 47 I am for the first time a full time stay at home mum to my autistic son.,I have worked in retail,banking,opened and closed several restaurants and. yes, used a cleaner once when i had 3 toddlers and a fulltime catering business.Now, at home I am as busy as at anytime in my life, School volunteering,helping out other working mums with school pick up times and nasty deadlines. I understand,I have been there, Hardly any of us are one thing or another, I am sure most of us here have done both at some stage of their lives. Fulltime mum, half time mum, full time worker..Its really needs must at the time.

    • Firefly says:

      01:54pm | 30/04/12

      As a teenage, single mother raised to believe that pensions were only for those unable to work, I had no choice but to be a working mother. On a pretty basic wage that just covered rent, childcare and bills, there was no chance of paying somebody to do the housework and I spent a lot of time tired,  feeling guilty at not spending time with my child and cross because I really didn’t want to work but didn’t want to be a ‘parasite on the pension’.
      My sister chose to be a SAHM, but with husband on a very basic wage, she needed to grow her own fruit and veges, sew their clothes, make their furniture, effect all her own house repairs and go without most things women take for granted. Her kids wanted for nothing (except fast food and softdrink which means they are all fit with perfect teeth), her husband treasured her, and working friends relied on her to do all the school mum tasks. She loved being there for her kids and happily made any sacrifices. Her soul isn’t destroyed and, with her kids grown up, she refreshed her degree and is happily working.
      Both of us just did the best we could, and dispite momentary envy of each other’s lifestyle we never judged each other.
      As for my childless-by-choice friends, I applaud them They know what they want and have not bowed to societal pressure. Some people are not designed to be parents and they have recognised that fact and got on with being who they want to be. That is a far better choice than the many out there who choose to have children with absolutely no intention of taking responsibility or caring for them.

    • Macca says:

      03:00pm | 30/04/12

      Why are there no ‘daddy wars’....?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter