Watership Down – remember it? It was a cartoon about bunnies on a common in England.

Nicole Miller and Melinda Bilbey getting the most out of Twilight. Reading the book first. Pic by Adam Ward.

Fiver has a weird dream; Hazel gets killed by the brown rabbits; and Art Garfunkel sang Bright Eyes while we wept buckets.

The Harry Potters – you must have seen them? Did you see the last one where Hermoine finally got control of her hair? No? In the beginning there were books and we all used our imagination to live the vision of a good writer who took us on a magical journey exercising our imaginations.

We endured the authors who wasted page after page on boring descriptions of every knicknack in the room and sped read the others who used dialogue to make us laugh out loud.
Now we rely on some director and editor to give us their version of a story, which is further interpreted by actors and often changed by a studio exec with an eye on the bottom line.

Sometimes they get it spot on, as Rowling has said about the Harry Potter series. Other times, they don’t get it right at all – and this is what I’m picking up about Twilight.

And it’s a shame because the book is great. A must-read for anyone of any age, regardless of whether or not they’re fans of Bram Stoker or just after a penny-dreadful to kill a weekend with.

The book is jam-packed with morals, delicately threaded through subtext so no teenager on earth will know they’re being preached at to help around the house, be a good daughter/son and do his/her homework.

I doubt any kid will realise the internal conflict in Edward, is constant. Born a decent, human being, he was changed and now has to battle his inherent weakness every day.

We could all hold Edward up as a role model. Giving up coffee? Well if Edward could smell Bella’s blood and not drink it, I can overcome the temptation of the smell of coffee/cigarettes/chocolate too.

My favourite subliminal message is the chivalry. I’d had a feeling it wasn’t dead, it was just living with the walking dead. (Have I confused vampirism with zombi-ism?)

Either way, the fact that Edward holds back from Bella because he doesn’t trust his strength, is a beautiful thing. He knows that he has to fight to maintain his resolve around her, and in the beginning tries to stay away from her. But the compelling force of love makes him want to be with her.

You hear that, guys? Don’t pounce on the first date! 

Will Twilight lead to teenagers leaning against each other in fields for hours instead of having random sex in the bushes when they’re drunk?
Speaking of drunk, no one does anything more naughty than take cold tablets to make sure they get a good night’s sleep. There’s a marvellous lack of alcohol and drugs.

I read Twilight during the Schoolies Week media feeding frenzy where every teenager under the sun, is under the sun, drunk, wearing something skanky (if at all) and having sex.

Could Twilight influence a new generation of kids to wait for the perfect love rather than next weekend?

Then there’s the sunsmart message. Bella doesn’t have, nor tries to get, a tan. As the palest person in Queensland, I applaud this message.

There’s not one crop top, bikini or shortie short in the entire book. It’s skank free, parent utopian reading.

I realise a Mormon wrote this book, probably because she wanted to read something that didn’t have a needle or a bottle in it. Even if you’re not a Christian, these values are universally respectable.

If a director can get all of that into a movie of 126 minutes, and make it stick in the hormone-dazed, fractured concentrations of post-modernists, then good on him.

But movies are about the effects, not the morals. I think a lot of the things I loved about the book will be lost in a flurry of Crouching Tiger fight scenes.

If your kids are badgering you to see the movie, make them read the book first. Maybe they’ll have some messages reinforced with a visual image.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

9 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.Chong says:

      06:57am | 25/11/09

      The movie is NEVER as good? Big call. All Twilight is is a “will she/they, wont she/they get it on, .with big dollps of young teen angst thrown in. Wuthering Heights without the wit, or depth.
      As for yur claim :no movie is better than the book, i would argue:
      “To Kill a Mocking bird” Atticus Finch cool in print or on the screen. Apocalypse Now (not the lame Redux) and “Heart of Darkness”, “Out of Africa” very much better than the story, same for “Empire of the Sun”  “The Mosquito Coast” and “God father(1)
      The best example would have to be “BladeRunner” - heaps better than"Do androids dream of electric sheep”

    • Melanie says:

      07:01am | 25/11/09

      Chivalry? He sabotages her car to stop her talking to other guys. And breaks into her room so that he can watch her sleeping without her knowing about it. And continually tries to run her life.

      That’s not chivalry. That’s stalking.

    • Manda says:

      07:35am | 25/11/09

      Subtext? Subliminal messages? You must have read a different version of Twilight to me. The morals are so overt, it’s not funny. I’m not a Twilight hater, I can admit I like the books, but it’s certainly not for their subtlety.

      Interestingly, if we are comparing the Harry Potter and Twilight adaptations- I would have thought that the Twilight films were more faithful to the original text. The scripts contains great chunks of the book’s dialogue and don’t miss out on major plot points or subplots that will be relevant later on (admittedly because the overarching story isn’t that complex). Whereas Potter fans are often disappointed because the movies miss out on so much.

    • Jonathan says:

      08:35am | 25/11/09

      “A must-read for anyone of any age”

      I’m sorry, what?  Please don’t assume that all readers succumb to every trashy literary fad that comes along.  This is no more a “must-read” than Dan Brown or J.K. Rowling.

      Take Twilight for what it is:  a bit of faux-vampire fun for teenagers who haven’t discovered the joys of requited love.  Don’t try and tell us that it contains the wisdom of the ages.

      Oh, and as for the title of your article: Fight Club was much better as a movie than as a book.  IMHO…

    • BPobjie says:

      10:05am | 25/11/09

      I disagree. I do not find elderly men preying on teenage girls to be “universally respectable”.

    • Tony says:

      11:06am | 25/11/09

      TC

      If Out of Africa the film is better than Out of Africa the book, the book must be a frightful load of rubbish.

      Do you have to read the book and watch the film at roughly the same time? I mean, can you really compare what you saw and loved at 15 with what you read and loved at 35? (Or vice versa.)

    • Julia Thornton says:

      12:03pm | 25/11/09

      @ all Sorry, guys. I think it’s a good book. I think it has a lot of values I want to instill in my kids, particularly about sex, love and relationships. If you see the negative, that’s fine. But I see a lot of positive in it.

      I’m not sure if your media has been bombarded with images of teenagers at the Gold Coast for Schoolies, but I like the contrast this book paints for me. I don’t want to think all teenagers are bad.

      And compare this book with Gossip Girl, where bullying via text is rife. Or the OC where everyone was off their nut or on their backs.

      @ T Chong
      ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’: Great film. You put Gregory Peck anywhere near the screen and I’m there. But some of the descriptions by Harper Lee of the heat in the South that Summer, you could not get that on celluloid. (That said, I think you have to witness the shooting of the dog to fully appreciate Atticus’s skill).

      @ Tony : not always. I’m a lazy pop culture watcher and I’ll take a movie over a book most days. But in this instance, if you want to get an idea of the author’s intent, I think the book does it far better.

      jt

    • Jimbo Jones says:

      01:29pm | 25/11/09

      ‘But movies are about the effects, not the morals’... uh huh… I hear rock’n'roll will corrupt youth (it is just noise after all).  Books vs films is a bit ‘early 20th century’ isn’t it (bluebloods vs ‘us’ film mongrels etc).  Plenty of books are better than or equal to their source material.  Some already discussed include Fight Club, Bladerunner, Godfather and Apocalypse Now and I’d also throw in High Fidelity and About a Boy (sue me, Cusack was king in HF and I found AAB’s characters more convincingly drawn in the film by comparison to the book).  Oh and the Soderbergh Solaris was pretty decent too (the book is completely different - two very, very different experiences but equally valid).  Did I mention The Exorcist (impressive book, impressive film), Jackie Brown (loads of fun either way), Orlando (Wolf’s book is a punishing bore IMHO but Potters film is a pure delight)... the list goes on and on.

    • Lucys says:

      01:16pm | 26/11/09

      This story didn’t seem to be about the movie adaptation - just an observation…

      I have to say however, i saw New Moon last night and have come to the conclusion that Chris Weiss is the anti-director.  What Catherine Hardwick did with Twilight was stunning, and was definitely an improvement on the book.  Chris Weiss, on the other hand, butchered New Moon into a boring, celebrity-littered, miserable, and quite frankly embarrassing, 2.5 hours of torture.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter