As a social researcher, you always try to keep your mind open and your ears alert to any slightly change in public sentiment.

Great expectations ... Picture: Kym Smith.

While it’s rare to hear anything new when you are listening to voters talk about politics, you have to allow yourself the opportunity to be surprised.

The week after Labor secured the necessary support to form government, we were in field conducting research for our bi-annual Mind & Mood report.

Unlike conventional focus group work, we bring together people of the same age and gender who are close friends.

We don’t have any prepared questions but invite them to speak on their own terms about whatever has occupied time, thought and conversation over the last four weeks. (Our work is purely qualitative and while the mood of the groups we listen to is illustrative of broader trends, extensive quantitative work has to be done to complement the findings.)

Going into this fieldwork I wondered what the verdict would be about the extraordinary election and post election period. Would people be angry? Excited? Anxious? Bored? Would it even come up as a topic of conversation? It was football finals week mind you …

While there were the predictable gripes about politics and politicians aired in these groups, there were three insights we took from the fieldwork that proved surprising, or at least interesting.

The first was that there was little evidence people were dead against going back to the polls.

If forced to make an educated guess prior to the fieldwork, I would have assumed that Australians were over politics and were relieved to be free to focus on football and forthcoming holidays. To some extent that was true.

Certainly the drawn out reasoning of the Independents and Mr. Oakeshott’s famous 17 minute speech had worn their patience thin.  That being said, the sentiment was that if the ‘new paradigm’ was faltering then a new election was inevitable and a way to achieve some certainty.

As one voter put it: “The sooner something gets sorted out in another election the better. At least we will get something that is definite”. Another voter, while frustrated at the ‘drawn out election’ nevertheless felt insecure about a government “elected by only half the population”. “I know it costs money to go back to the polls but I think we should do it”, she said.

The next valuable insight was that while consumers were worried about the ‘instability’ of the new political arrangements, they were just as worried about the possibility that the Federal Government would be hamstrung and inactive. 

Would this new form of government find decision making, particularly on important and contentious issues, difficult given the amount of negotiation required? Consider a few of the following comments made in our fieldwork on this question:

Man 1: It’s a worry what’s going to happen. What damage is going to be done or more likely what isn’t going to get done? What direction are we going in or not going in?
Man 2: It might be the case of what is not going to be done because no one will be game enough to test it.
Man 3: They will sit on the fence.

No-one will pass anything for the next few years. They’re too scared. No-one is mentioning anything.

Gillard can just bide her time because she’ll be too scared to do anything. So she’ll do nothing just so she can stay in power.

The final useful insight from the research relates to sentiment about the Prime Minister. In our April Mind & Mood, consumers seemed to hold great expectations for Julia Gillard the deputy PM. They saw her claims to the top job as legitimate.

However there have been a number of blows to her legitimacy since then.

The ousting of Kevin Rudd was still raised by some in our groups. For those who believed Gillard instigated the coup, she was viewed as disloyal and power hungry. For those who believed she was merely a puppet of the ALP’s faceless men, they were disappointed she didn’t show greater strength and independence.

Woman 1: I still think what they did to Kevin Rudd really stunk.
Woman 2: They treated the leader of our country in very, very poor way.

It wasn’t Julia. She was pushed into it. Julia is just a puppet. She is being used. That Shorten guy, he wants the job. He was the instigator.

While there was unease about how she became PM before the election, there were similar concerns about how Julia Gillard became PM after the election, namely by wooing the Independents rather than convincing the majority of the electorate.

It’s Gillard but we didn’t actually vote for her.

She’s had to bend over backwards to get in.

Julia got in because of the Independents. To be honest with the people of Australia we should have another election.

Gillard became PM via a coup, headed a disastrous campaign that resulted in a tied election and weeks of uncertainty and then became PM a second time via a deal.

It all amounts to a somewhat tentative hold on power. And yet the way she manages the job now, her proven capacity to negotiate and communicate outcomes, may well give her leadership the solid foundations it needs.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

Most commented

56 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      05:26am | 03/11/10

      The 2004 election was a referendum on Bush’s success. Today’s election will be a referendum on Obama’s failure.

      In retrospect, both results will appear inevitable.

    • Eric says:

      02:47pm | 03/11/10

      Sorry. This comment was meant to go in the Open Thread. My bad.

    • dead to me says:

      05:56am | 03/11/10

      Gillard is a backdstabber and untalented politician. She is leading a government that is failing us in almost every way. That is her tanished legacy and that will define her forever.

    • Jim says:

      07:25am | 03/11/10

      Politician: One who practices politics…
      On that count Gillard is exceptional. The whole ALP is….shame they suck at government though.

    • Cate P says:

      04:28pm | 03/11/10

      Gee Jim, you’d think with all that practice she’d be better at it.

    • Joan says:

      06:59am | 03/11/10

      `her proven capacity to negotiate and communicate outcomes, may well give her leadership the solid foundations it needs. ` Exactly what has she negotiated that resulted in successful outcomes- outcomes for whom?  Gillard or the people of Australia? .  Some examples please.

    • MarK says:

      07:18am | 03/11/10

      “And yet the way she manages the job now, her proven capacity to negotiate and communicate outcomes, may well give her leadership the solid foundations it needs.”

      Please provide some evidence to back this statement up.

      The evidence to the contrary is quite compelling.

      Anyone?

    • Holly says:

      07:26am | 03/11/10

      Oh well I will just point out that Julia Gillard’s preferred prime minister rating has increased quite markedly in the past few weeks, to the extent that the majority of people think she is doing something right.

      Your research just seem like a rehash of old views and news.  Perhaps some more social research on whether it is acceptable for the leader of the opposition to always be negative, divisive and loose with the truth.  That may be why his preferred prime minister ratings are taking a nose dive.

    • Rosie says:

      07:46am | 03/11/10

      Rebecca, I was surprised no one mentioned Gillard’s boyfriend living in the Lodge and tagging along behind her on the international stage at the taxpayer’s expense.

      I look forward to my country having a married PM, with children if possible like every other Australian PM that I have known.

    • Simmo says:

      08:40am | 03/11/10

      Yes absolutely! Let’s also make sure that every Prime Minister is an old, white, male because change is the devil!

    • Mother Rose says:

      08:56am | 03/11/10

      You just did!

      Did you complain when Janette tagged along with little johnny at the taxpayers expense?

    • Zac says:

      01:15pm | 03/11/10

      look forward to my country having a married PM, with children if possible like every other Australian PM that I have known.>>>

      Can’t agree more Rosie. Here is a woman who has made the deliberate choice to have no kids or family and not even marriage (but thinks she is fit and knows the challenges a family face & is qualified to govern families - voters). She says it’s for her career. However I think she doesn’t believe in marriage or kids - symptoms of feminism. May be she represents the feminists, singles lobby and the gays but not traditional families. With the people she represents, PM’s like her may not have a country to govern in the future. My family has nothing in common with her or her boy friend. I am still waiting for PM who represents our society.

       

       

       

       


      ..

    • The Badger says:

      01:28pm | 03/11/10

      Zac
      Praise the lord and pass the snakes.

    • Zac says:

      01:47pm | 03/11/10

      Badger,

      Hail Darwin, snakes pass to monkeys.

    • Reg says:

      03:58pm | 03/11/10

      @Zac. “May be she represents the feminists, singles lobby and the gays but not traditional families.”

      Well that’s an assumption your are entitled to, just as your likely to be wrong, rather than simply bigoted.

    • Lucy says:

      10:59pm | 03/11/10

      Wow this comment is so backward, I’m not sure if I should laugh or cry?!

    • Steve says:

      07:52am | 03/11/10

      Rebecca - what a fascinating article. I don’t think there is anything in it that wasn’t something i already did not know but you rarely hear or read with great depth ‘the mood of the people’ the amount of times i hear about polls and such, i tend not to believe any of those but your study group i think is a true indicator of the people. Maybe the politicians should start listening to your study group out comes instead of the polls.

    • Reg says:

      04:05pm | 03/11/10

      I’m just concerned at whether these"good friends” came out the other end with the friendship tested or not. The term is a source of never-ending mirth considering the divorce rate and the number of couples who choose never to tie themselves up in legal formality. They have to be dragged in by scorn from people such as Zoe and Rosy or by laws drummed up by their religious associates, “for their own good.”.

    • Anti-market-research says:

      07:59am | 03/11/10

      You pollsters are a pox on the body politic. The fact you get a column to trot out this insipid nothing is telling about the society we live in.

      The sad thing is that politicians accept without discussion the mindless drivel you regurgitate from the uninterested and uninformed and use it to “craft” their policies. This is why we have no leadership in this country, no vision, just bad reactive policy.

      Rebecca…please…get a real job.

    • JulesG says:

      10:01am | 03/11/10

      Anti Market Research: I couldn’t agree more. All this so called ‘study’ does is emphasise just how politically illiterate people are. This article is very badly written, especially for a columnist or professional writer and just allows the inarticulate to voice their opinion about stuff they know nothing about. 50% voted for the present incumbents through legal, due process, either directly or indirectly and that has put the nose of the other 50% out of joint. Why would another election fix this? In all probability it would have a similar outcome. As for Ms Gillard doing nothing so she can be re-elected is just the greatest pile of BS I’ve ever heard. At least the labour side have got some policies, which is more than can be said of the opposition. They are just floundering, trying to destroy and decry everything the government does for the sake of opposition itself, rather than offering any alternative policies or ideas. This article is saying nothing other than, that in some way, the election was shonky and we should have another one and yet another and another until, we get the result we want. This proposition is preposterous and so is the idea of gauging the ‘mood’ of the people in this fashion. You will have as many different ‘moods’ as the number of people you ask.  We should be supporting our government to do its absolute best for the sake of Australia, instead of writing poorly written and conceived, inflammatory articles like this, that invite ill informed and unqualified comment..

    • Jim says:

      10:20am | 03/11/10

      @JulesG…“50% voted for the present incumbents through legal, due process” - really?

      It’s only a matter of time before more Labor pollies get caught out branch stacking. Then there’s GetUp!s High Court ruling that will be exposed as a Labor ploy that gave people extra time to ‘move in with the in-laws’ (funny how there were 5000 votes in Parramatta above what the population there is). Don’t forget the Labor members dressing up as Coalition volunteers on polling day, handing out false how to vote cards, the ‘cemetary votes’ that have been a labor/union tactic since federation, the Labor people going into nursing homes with ballot sheets and telling Gran where to put their number 1…There is nothing honest about your beloved party Jules, nothing.

    • Who do you think? says:

      11:14am | 03/11/10

      jim can’t post without bashing the unions at least once.
      Sad really - perhaps some sort of therapy might help.

      Everything is controlled by a small evil group to which, unfortunately, no one we know belongs.

    • JulesG says:

      11:23am | 03/11/10

      Jim: So, the Lindsay, racist, electoral pamphlet scam involving 3 senior Libs and their partners never happened? The reason why Howard’s gerrymander of the electoral commission was turned over by the high court was because it was illegal. As for Labour candidates soliciting votes in the manner that you describe, this is also illegal and if you have 1st hand knowledge of same, then you should report it forthwith.

    • Jim says:

      11:55am | 03/11/10

      Change your tag Badger? They deserve to be bashed…find one comment I’ve ever made about unions that is a fabrication.

    • Gregg says:

      03:19pm | 03/11/10

      Jules, you do to get with the mood for it would seem that is for a government to have policies to be implemented other than keeping the back flips school well funded.
      Backflips aside, it would be more Julia floundering around from Timor to Northam, across to Inverbrackie and dropping in on Malaysia and Indonesia on the way back from Hanoi.
      Did you note the latest version of moving forward with handling overseas queries about how much her so called regional plan would cost?
      Well, we don’t try to guess on those things do we and it will all move forward with dialogue.
      Then there’re the domestic flounders too and not just fishy but her being dictated to by the Greens.
      You can take up the destroyer chant all you like but there’re a lot of people who would want the real costs/benefits of $43B+++ spend investigated and outlined rather than just see our economy destroyed more so.
      Obviously you rant as well as chant for alternatives have been put for the broadband, how the BER is managed and for the people smuggling, all that can have a significant immediate impact on this country and longer term benefits too.

    • Simmo says:

      08:36am | 03/11/10

      I’m curious if Tony abbott had convinced the independents to side with him and was now Prime Minister would we be seeing these same views among people? Some claim that this government has no legitimacy because it didn’t get a majority but wouldn’t the same also have applied if the LNP formed government.

      “It’s Gillard but we didn’t actually vote for her.”

      “She’s had to bend over backwards to get in.”

      “Julia got in because of the Independents. To be honest with the people of Australia we should have another election.”

      Replace gillard with abbott and these exact same arguments could have been used if Labor was unable to form Government but would these same people be willing to agree that if the situation was reversed Tony didn’t get voted in, that he isn’t legitimate?

      Hypocrisy, the cornerstone of a democracy.

    • Jim says:

      10:29am | 03/11/10

      Simmo, only a Labor government could perform this badly and this dishonestly and get away with it. If a conservative government did half this badly there would already be mass demonstrations and rallies by unions and the feral green contingent.

      That is the real hypocrisy.

    • JulesG says:

      10:41am | 03/11/10

      Spot-on Simmo! Apparently, another election will fix this. It’s all smoke and mirrors you know. Julia Gillard and the Labour party won more seats than the opposition, that is how she was, ‘not’ voted in

    • Marg says:

      08:37am | 03/11/10

      I love you Rebecca… don’t listen to the idiot solialist alliance stooges ...
      Do people know yet that there are three (3) more boatloads of illegals in our waters and no-one has told us yet?  Why not??? 
      Better ask your local MPs ... good luck!

    • The Badger says:

      10:10am | 03/11/10

      Marg
      If this is true, someone obviously told you - so you do know.
      or you are on a Navy ship about to intercept them.
      Are you worried that they will beach their boat on your doorstep and ask you for food and shelter?

      Sorry Marg, I don’t hear the whistler.

    • JulesG says:

      10:30am | 03/11/10

      What has this got to do with this article, Marg? They are 3 boatloads of PEOPLE. What would you do to fix this exodus of displaced souls? Do tell. Aren’t you lucky that you’re not one of them?

      Like I said, “We should be supporting our government to do its absolute best for the sake of Australia, instead of writing poorly written and conceived, inflammatory articles like this, that invite ill informed and unqualified comment”.

    • Gregg says:

      03:27pm | 03/11/10

      Jules, it’s very simple really.
      1. You invoke temporary protection visas
      2. you open up Nauru for those who may want to ignore that there are already many refugee centres throughout the middle east and asia.
      Some would call them regional centres that people using people smugglers do not want to use so as they can force themselves upon us rather than be part of the global refugee selections system.

      And what this has to do with this article btw Jules is as relevant as your commentary about the opposition being destroyers just because they want some responsibility shown by a government towards the prople they are supposed to govern for.

    • Vin says:

      09:06am | 03/11/10

      $500 million to build schools in Indonesia! Well done Gillard! Aussie families everywhere must be wondering why the hell they didn’t for for Abbott.

    • Jim says:

      10:23am | 03/11/10

      If the BER is any measure, $500M may get them a canteen that’s too small to store anything, an undercover assembly area, and if they’re lucky some floodlights that will stay on all night and piss off everyone within 10kms.

    • martinX says:

      01:27pm | 03/11/10

      Jim, don’t let Garrett near them. He’ll install batts in them and cause an international incident when the lot burn down.

    • Cate P says:

      04:31pm | 03/11/10

      500mil should just about pay for the plans

    • Ask a stupid question says:

      08:08pm | 03/11/10

      And then they must be remembering, Vin, that Abbott was the reason.

    • Old Clive says:

      09:18am | 03/11/10

      Another election as soon as possible,BUT before the greens get control of the Senate, the free amigos have stuffed up the lower house, lets get a decision one way or another, let majority rule once again not minority. I don’t care who wins but let us have another go as quickly as possible, and less biased interference from the media would be helpful. They contributed to this mess.

    • Ray says:

      10:36am | 03/11/10

      Sadly, the ‘new paradigm’ has not altered the Government’s capacity for spin. In fact, it has added to its spin range, e.g. by accusing the Opposition of engaging in “Hansonite economics”.

      Closer analysis reveals that the Govt often does not practise what it preaches by way of spin. For example, with regard to its claims to increase productivity, its over-spending on the BER and ceiling insulation and the looming over-spending on the NBN,  lower the productivity of public capital expenditure, while imposition of a carbon tax would raise electricity prices and thus lower user industries’ productivity.

    • Lucas says:

      10:38am | 03/11/10

      Why do the media and Government keep banging on about Gillards negotiating skills? What are they talking about? Mining tax? East Timor regional processing centre? Negotiations with Malaysia? Independents that were always going to support Labor? Negotiations with the Unions to get rid of Rudd and install her as PM? Come to think of it, saying she has “negotiatingskills"is about the only positive label she has been given and even that is a load of B/S. She has to be the most lack lustre over hyped PM for a long time if ever. She’s our first female PM is about it for her, nothing else going on there from what I can see. Oh hang on there is the “Best Performing Seal” label she gets in QT.

    • Andy says:

      11:02am | 03/11/10

      Gillard is like a ship without a rudder. No direction, but a polished performer for the camera and microphone. No credentials or attributes for the PM’s job what so ever. She won’t last long, watch this space.

    • The Badger says:

      11:31am | 03/11/10

      The coalition is like a ship without a hull. No direction, but a very fine looking ship (the part that juts above the water at low tide). A perfectly good rudder though mired in the tidal flats of the conservative ideology.  She won’t last long, the worms have already started eating away the once solid timbers.
      watch this space.

      Hey Andy, Woody’s been looking for you.

    • Against the Man says:

      03:57pm | 03/11/10

      Gillard wanted to be PM for the history books, doing a good job and being a useful leader was not part of the plan. Some people are born losers, others are born to lose, she is one of the rare ones that fits both those categories.

    • Ask a stupid question says:

      08:11pm | 03/11/10

      What does that make you and Tony Abbott then, AtM ? Ouch.

    • Tezza says:

      11:06am | 03/11/10

      I think I’m with “Anti Market Researcher”. What a meretricious form of “social research” to eavesdrop on a group of close friends same age and gender and expect anything useful to emerge. Wouldn’t you expect close friends same age and gender to have remarkably similar views to one another; but what does that tell you about the views of anybody else in society? Where’s the random selection and distribution of opinions. Didn’t your “social researcher” qualifications include any course in statistics?

    • JulesG says:

      01:11pm | 03/11/10

      No, apparently not. The only bell curve they’ve ever heard of is the one that tolls for their highly subjective and skewed ‘research’

    • Super D says:

      11:10am | 03/11/10

      I think it’s just that the reality of having an unmarried ranga bogan running the show is sinking in.

    • Ben81 says:

      12:45pm | 03/11/10

      No I don’t think any of that garbage has much to do with anything, but there’s certainly plenty of real world reasons why we should be seriously concerned with the performance of this government.  Perhaps focus on those instead…

    • Lucas says:

      11:34am | 03/11/10

      Does anyone take her overseas trip seriously? Sounded more like a cash drop off, a cool $500 mill for Indonesia,  the President cancelled his appointment with her to visit volcano victims and gave her no support for a regional processing centre.  She got no support from Malaysia and said they had outstanding issues, another Leader who had to cancel his appointment with her. An overseas trip of nothing really, a few hand shakes, a few non answers at press conferences and a wave from the plane. Gillard the negotiator, don’t make me laugh.

    • beno says:

      11:39am | 03/11/10

      Wow, Super D that sentence of vitriol is amazing even for someone who is stupid enough to call themselves Super anything.  Haven’t you Libs accepted that you didn’t win, yet.

    • Richard says:

      02:50pm | 03/11/10

      Yeah keep gloating about your “victory” beno, the electorate loves a bunch of arrogant braggarts going on and on about how they “won” the election (even though *Newsflash it was a draw).

    • Against the Man says:

      06:18pm | 03/11/10

      HaHa watching ALP families suffer is the sweetest revenge! Great job voting for the Labor government guys! Enjoy the high interest and utility rates and the waste of your taxpayer monies. Enjoy watching your kids be economic slaves to Singapore/Indonesia! HaHa so good!

    • Mike T says:

      12:21pm | 03/11/10

      My view, as a average man is that Govts in power are driven by two factors. One being the goal to stay in power the other being to govern for the good of the country. Unfortunaltry these two drivers are often at odds.

      The knew paradigm has shifetd the emphasis away from governeming for the good of the Austrlian people towards the “stay in power” goal due to the balance of power being spread around. Too many decisions are now based on keeping this group happy and paying back on preferacnes. The loser in this “new paradigm” is without doubt, the Australain people.

    • Andy says:

      01:20pm | 03/11/10

      Is Jules going to come home and accuse Swan of “economic Hansonism” now he’s decided to listen to Hockey?

    • Shelley says:

      06:17pm | 03/11/10

      I thought your article was well written and unbiased until this sentece ‘her proven capacity to negotiate and communicate outcomes, may well give her leadership the solid foundations it needs’.  Outcomes, really???

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@anderson_lainie He he. And congrats to Max!

ToryShepherd

@VictoriaPurman Then you should have included sex toys and yoga ;-)

Malcolm Farr

@Chritana01 No. NSW state

Daniel Piotrowski

@FreeDannyJovica Hi guys, I sent you a Facebook message. What's the latest on Danny Jovica?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter