Fact: You are more likely to be bitten by a New Yorker than by a shark.

Chances of running into this guy in a dark alley are a lot less than a stranger in New York. Photo: AFP.

Summer is a matter of weeks away, and almost on cue, sharks are being sighted, and a media frenzy is beginning.

A frenzy not one unlike the shark one they would have us believe is approaching.

Last week there was the news that a large hook had been bent in the ocean, possibly by a ‘monster-shark’, and that possible shark could possibly be up to 6 metres in length.

Seven News, aware that they had a big one on the line, aired footage of a hammerhead shark that happened to be unluckily in the path of their helicopter (or as I’d like to think of it as, an ‘innocent bystander’).

Many news services later followed it up with the story of a surfer who recently died from a shark attack in California.  Since then a diver off the coast of Western Australia has been attacked. If this is any indication of the months ahead, it’s going to be a long, shark-filled summer. 

So what is it about sharks that manage to tap such terror into us, and lead the media to focus an unwarranted amount of coverage on a bent fishing hook?

Dog attacks are more common, and yet we lie beside these faithful companions in our sleep. It is possibly just a ‘mammal’ thing – we’re untrustworthy of what is a large fish with an uncompassionate ‘face’ and sharp teeth.

We’re already out of our element, swimming with limbs that by design are for land. Regardless of what drives us to be scared of these creatures, whether it be ‘phyla-phobia’ or something you can blame on Steven Spielberg, it’s a fact that they’ve got more to be scared of from us.

Imagine, if you will, that humans were in the shark’s position. Every year Earth would get a certain amount of alien visitors from outer space, beings that aren’t built to survive in our environment, but still enjoy the feel of our atmosphere.

The number of alien visitors increase in summer months, and every now and then, we accidentally hit and kill one of them with a car. It happens, and is unfortunate, but face it, we’re doing it to each other all the time.

The aliens, however, don’t react kindly to this. Their media becomes hysterical by the prospect of ‘human attacks’, there are worried stories about ‘human sightings’ every time aliens visit the Earth… and yet they keep coming. Their numbers don’t slow, they increase.

In the meantime, the aliens are hunting humans, because they’ve found that human skin makes an excellent sofa cover that both complements the décor and resists stains.

This last part of my thinly veiled analogy points to shark fin soup – some estimates say that up to 100 million sharks killed every year just for their fins, which are ground up and put into soup that tastes more of the chicken stock than any of the other ingredients.

I’m not saying that shark attacks aren’t terrible when they happen. Nor am I saying that we shouldn’t be careful in the water, or shouldn’t be aware of when they’re about. What I believe is important to remember is that the chance of a shark attack is remote.

On average, one person has died from shark attack in Australia per year, a remarkably steady number considering our population increase of 5 million in less than 20 years.

You are 80 times more likely to die in a drowning accident, 11 times more likely to die by being struck by lightening, and 3 times more likely to die from bee stings.

True, if we weren’t being scared out of the water by the media the occurrences might be much higher – they could be seen as being a valuable (but questionable) public service that way.

But should we fear and hate the shark? Certainly not. Remember, you are aliens in their world. You are visitors making use of their home.

One distant day, and Darwin willing when sharks are more evolved, they will have a nightly news service that is just as frightened of humans and filled with human sightings – perhaps at that point, we may treat them a little kinder.

Join Matt’s blog www.endofthespectrum.net here

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

41 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • James says:

      07:08am | 02/11/10

      Matt…Awesome article! As a lover of sharks and pretty much all marine life, I’ve always tried to explain this to people who believe we should kill all the sharks in the ocean. Your alien analogy is perfect. Cheers

    • Amanda says:

      07:43am | 02/11/10

      Great piece. People really need some perspective when it comes to sharks. The amount of attacks on humans in their territory is nothing compared to the cruelty they suffer in the millions every year. I highly recommend everyone see the documentary ‘Sharkwater’, most important film i’ve seen this year.

    • Peter says:

      07:45am | 02/11/10

      Matt I agree with your views on the shark but I don’t accept your proposition that humans are “aliens” in the sea.
      While our bodies might be best adapted to terrestrial existence, that hasn’t stopped our brains taking us across and beneath the seas, deep underground and far higher than any bird.
      Humans are endlessly drawn to the sea. Being in the ocean is a natural and regular part of many people’s existence. Surfers, sailors, fishermen and divers spend much of their lives in or on the sea and just as much time in contemplation of its endless facets. People who fly planes are probably just as fixated on the skies. We might at times be caught out of our depth in the ocean, but in my opinion, the aquatic environment is just one part of earth and the universe, all of which is the natural habitat of our minds and ultimately, our selves.

    • lance boyels of bayswater says:

      11:03am | 02/11/10

      i agree peter i am starting to get a little annoyed at ‘‘we have no right to be in there enviroment ‘’ attitude that pops up on the forums every time sharks get a mention . i was born of this planet i have as much right to exist on this planet as the next creature any part of this planet i chose

    • mw says:

      11:15am | 02/11/10

      Yes, the entire universe is our environment and our bodies are made to inhabit it all…

      bloody hippies…

    • Dan says:

      11:53am | 02/11/10

      lance boyels of bayswater; “was born of this planet i have as much right to exist on this planet as the next creature any part of this planet i chose”

      No, you don’t. Not only is there no such thing as a right to venture to any part of the planet you choose, but humans will survive if we never venture out into the ocean. Sharks obviously will not survive if they leave the ocean.

      This idea that human beings have as much ‘right’ to be in the ocean as sharks is too arrogant for words. I hope you don’t expect a shark to be ‘punished’ should it kill you for exercising your rights.

    • WillOw says:

      01:32pm | 02/11/10

      You’re using those words again. “might” and “probably”. You’re using supposition to justify your reasoning.

      Yes, humans love the oceans, flying, and space. And yes, we’ve created tools and machinery to get us there. However that’s the point. We need to use tools to reach these ‘alien’ environments and when we enter these alien environments, to those that live there, we are alien and unknown to them.

      There are things on land and sea, let alone the entire universe, that is beyond the scope of our minds. There is a lot we don’t realise we don’t know. It’s why we explore the environments around us. By all means, we should go and explore these places, but we should not take ownership of these places because we frequently visit them.

    • Steve says:

      10:59am | 21/12/10

      Wrong. We have built machines to enable us to venture into environments that we are not NATURALLY built to survive in. If we were meant to be in the ocean then we would have gills and webbed feet.

    • Mr Pastry says:

      07:54am | 02/11/10

      Everyone knows the low possibility of shark encounter, just witness all the early morning surfers (here in Queensland anyway). Our fear and the hyped news stories are just a manifestation of respect.  We are acknowledging our subservience when in water to these awesome creatures.  Young drivers should be removed from the roads before taking out rogue sharks.

    • Elphaba says:

      07:54am | 02/11/10

      Great article Matt.  The shark hysteria is ridiculous.  If you are that concerned that you’re going to be attacked by a shark, then don’t swim in the ocean.  Otherwise, accept that we’ve all got to go sometime, but that the probability of it being by shark attack is pretty remote.

      I’m planning my nexy holiday OS (safari in Africa) ending with a stop in Jo’berg to swim at Shark Alley.  I’ve always wanted to do it, it’s going to be awesome. grin

    • Mikko says:

      08:28am | 02/11/10

      As an old skin diver and spearo from way back I’ve seen my fair share of sharks in their own environment but given the choice I think I’d take lightning strike, drowning, yep maybe even bee stings over being ripped apart by a bull shark or supposedly endangered great white. How about you?

    • Mako says:

      09:18am | 02/11/10

      You do have the choice, Mikko.  You and your spearfishing gear choose not to hunt in the same waters where sharks are, and you get the choice (statistically) to be struck by lightning, killed by bees or drown.  I’m not telling you to stay out of the water any more than I as a keen diver would stay out of the water.  But if I get done by a shark, that’s the price of coexistence.

    • Dan says:

      11:54am | 02/11/10

      That’s not the point. The point isn’t which death is more preferrable (although drowning scares me more than being killed by a shark), but how frequent a shark attacks are, and how avoidable. If you don’t want to be attacked by a shark, don’t go into the ocean.

    • Digby says:

      08:36am | 02/11/10

      sorry - I have been too worried about the ‘state being a tinderbox’ to be concerned about sharks

    • W says:

      08:49am | 02/11/10

      The statistics tell the story. If sharks (and this also applies to that other favourite - the nasty,nasty crocodile) were such ravenous maneaters we would have dozens of attacks a day.

    • Tanya D says:

      09:02am | 02/11/10

      Thanks for being one of the few in the media making rationale, sensible comments about sharks. As a SCUBA diver, I’m always thrilled and awed if I’m lucky enough to see one underwater which is very rare; the majority of sharks are not aggressive or predatory, just curious and often very timid. Obviously you wouldn’t pull its tail or threaten one, a cornered shark will not react kindly.

      It’s criminal the way we’ve driven these magnificent beasts to the brink of extinction with (the often illegal) practice of slaughtering them for their fins; and ridiculous the way we demonise them when it’s unlikely we’ll ever see one, let alone get bit.

    • Clancy says:

      09:47am | 02/11/10

      Most of us do keep some weariness in the back of our minds when swimming about sharks, but it is not a ‘real’ genuine fear, not like the kind of fear some incompetent motorists put in us!  One time some woman suddenly stopped on a merging lane even tho there were no cars for some time on the other road. A huge truck behind me couldn’t stop quick enough and went up on the embankment beside me and i thought it would roll on top of me, i thought i was a dead man, but thankfully it did not roll. Forget speeding drivers, it is the incompetent drivers that are the most dangerous!

    • Sheedy's Left Foot says:

      10:00am | 02/11/10

      There may or may not be a shark, which may or may not be big, which may or may not be bending hooks and which may or may not progress onto eating every human withing 10m of Australia’s Eastern Coast. Why shouldn’t we all be terrifed, we are all going to die!!!! <runs around screaming>

      Seriously, I spent last night trying to persuade a 5 and a 4 year old that going to the beach this weekend would be safe because they had heard some of the hysterical crap being spouted by various media outlets in QLD. It is sensationalist and really rather shameful considering on average globally there are 7-12 shark attacks each year and QLD’s road fatalities stood at 331 in 2009.

    • simmo says:

      10:16am | 02/11/10

      what a load of rubbish, you more likely to be eaten by a sydney woman than a shark… the only good thing is a shark won’t take your wallet, house, car and leave you broke….

    • mw says:

      11:52am | 02/11/10

      sounds like you’ve survived a sydney woman attack?

    • stephen says:

      10:53am | 02/11/10

      Last chick i was with left me legless.
      Does that count ?

    • MF says:

      10:54am | 02/11/10

      I like sharks.  I actively go to places where I know I’m likely to see sharks when I go scuba diving.  I know the risks and every time I get in the ocean I’m making that personal judgment call to take that risk.  My family (also lovers of marine life) knows how I feel.  If something were ever to happen to me while diving, they’d be right up there saying I knew the risks and I was in the shark’s backyard and not to go hunting them down.

    • Mako says:

      12:03pm | 02/11/10

      Same here MF.  As a scuba-diver I actively seek out known shark-ecounter areas, especially for particular types of non-aggressive sharks, but I also use devices like the SharkShield (which seemed infallible although I hear the girl attacked yesterday was wearing one?) to minimise, not mitigate the risk.  It’s not a blaze of glory mentality, but if I do get mauled by a shark it will be a case of mistaken identity and bad luck, not because they’re mindless killing machines.

      You want to talk about fear let’s talk about saltwater crocodiles.  I’ve been living around those bastards for the last four years and they are ****ing scary.  Difference is, you respect that they are apex predators and just don’t get in the water at all with them.

      And as someone posted earlier, even scarier than sharks and crocodiles combined is road users, especially up here in the tropics.  Lethal, unpredictable, mindless killing machines.

    • WillOw says:

      01:19pm | 02/11/10

      Great article Matt! For people to only believe the media hype, and thinking that Jaws is a documentary, it undermines the shark’s intelligence and 400 MILLION years of evolution and symbiosis with it’s environment.

      I have personally boycotted shark-based products such as shark fin soup, and flake from the fish and chip shops (ask them what fish it is before buying), however it is still saddening to see restaurants in Sydney, a city with wonderful dive sites and marine habitats, still selling shark fin soup whilst being approved of in foodie guides. There is still an attitude, which people turn a blind eye to, that approves of the wiping out of sharks be it for the sake of culture or tradition. The oceans aren’t limitless and our perception of the time taken for a fishing ground to recover from our harvesting is being clouded by greed!

      As a SCUBA diver that has experienced sharks up close on a regular basis, we very much are ‘aliens’ to the underwater domain. And by ‘alien’ I mean we cannot survive in that environment naturally as we do on terra firma. Just as we cannot survive in space without a space suit, we cannot survive underwater without our SCUBA equipment. Our bodies simply cannot withstand that environment unassisted on a permanent basis. Being drawn to the sea does not mean we are not aliens to the creatures that inhabit it.

      People are quite happy to protect whales, dolphins, penguins, and turtles from our own tyranny. Sharks deserve that same protection. It’s like running a hotel but firing the pool cleaner. At some point the pool will become unswimmable.

    • James says:

      03:17pm | 02/11/10

      I have the same boycott with food and restaurants. This annoyed a group of my friends last time I was in Melb. I wouldn’t eat at their fave Chinese restaurant as it served shark fin soup.

      What amazes me is that crocodiles are ferocious and will purposely go after you, yet they are protected and nobody seems to complain and want to kill them all after “another” tourist gets taken.

      I’m a diver also and haven’t had the pleasure of being up close to sharks yet but going to head to Seal Rock soon to hang with some Grey Nurse friends smile

    • Daniel says:

      01:31pm | 02/11/10

      Nice writing there. Nicely put facts also. People need to keep things in perspective really and take what the media spoon feeds us with a grain of salt.

    • Aussie Wazza says:

      01:40pm | 02/11/10

      I love all sea creatures I have tried so far. Chilli Crab, Mussles in garlic, Oyster Kilpatric, Scallops in butter, Prawn cocktail, Cockles, Baked salmon, Abalone,Tuna mornay, Calamari rings, Grilled Octopus, Fried fish, Beche de mer, Steamed Haddock. Shark is great as it has no bones. I will even eat fish fingers at a push.

      God made them all for our pleasure. Be thankful.

    • Mikko says:

      02:02pm | 02/11/10

      Haha Aussie Wazza well said. Tell you what, there are a lot more of them about today including white pointers than there were 40 years ago, despite what the Greenies will tell you.  (Suspect most of those commenting here wouldn’t have a clue what was in the ocean back then. We never heard of great whites in Qld waters and I dived around seal colonies at Montague Island without ever spotting one - thankfully or I probably wouldn’t be typing this). I always respected sharks in the water too, we all have our rightful place in the world and from what science tells us, we all came from the sea originally.

    • Darren says:

      08:52pm | 21/11/10

      Mikko,what about the famous Tangalooma whaling station not so long ago - where massive sharks such as whites,tigers,whalers would gather to feast on the whale carcasses.Some of the largest sharks ever caught were from QLD waters!

      I’m happy to catch the smaller bronze whalers and also gummy sharks here in Vic…yummmm.They come in VERY close to shore also,in case anyone is kidding themselves about their prevalence in summer.Always following the fish schools.

    • Tombowler says:

      02:37pm | 02/11/10

      Sharks are bastards.

      Humans have systematically climbed to the top of the food chain by comprehensively butt-f%$% any so-called “predator” that attempts to assert it’s dominance. We are in fact superior to the glorified angry fish that is a shark and there is no reason we shouldn’t wipe the pricks out when they get above their station. England was once full of wolves (nobler, smarter and more awe-inspiring creatures than some dead-eyed shark) and we didn’t get all “oh the peasants that the wolf ate were in it’s territory”- no, we promptly made it OUR territory and consequently prospered. Sick of all this hippy bullshit about it being the sharks ‘territory’. They are highly unevolved, primitive fish with no more concept of ‘territory’ than a baseball. If I’m bitten by a shark I want my family to go shock and awe on those pricks with depth-charges and grenade-tipped spear guns- not have some love-in ‘they just wanna eat crap’.

      Dirty hippy’s be damned! Give me some long lines, a 40ft boat and a remington 870 shotty and we’ll see who’s territory it really is!!

    • Likes Joining Dots says:

      03:59pm | 02/11/10

      Tombowler, I know how you feel, but it’s not just sharks.

      On a similiar topic, I was driving along at 165 kph in the outback (it’s safe it was an unlimited road) when a kangaroo attacked me and my car from the side. Luckily it missed me, but it could have been a tragedy for me.

      We really need to get rid of those bouncing killers ... now!
      And don’t get me started on drop bears and sundry rocks, they’ll do you in too. Shoot them now.

    • Fred says:

      11:04pm | 03/11/10

      “They are highly unevolved, primitive fish” 

      lol… nice one Tombowler. Might I suggest doing some research on the topic before making yourself look like such a muppet in future?

    • Kate says:

      03:49pm | 02/11/10

      Good article, and I agree, we are at much more risk of death from drowning, traffic accidents, natural causes etc than shark attack.

      I reckon the reason for all the fear and media hype is that sharks look frigging scary. Cars aren’t scary (despite Stephen King’s best efforts to make them so). Cancer is a scary thought, but a picture of a bunch of cells isn’t. Water isn’t scary. Sharks on the other hand have those dead eyes, about fifty thousand teeth and big-arse fins. And then there’s the Jaws effect. And Open Water and all the other movies where people die a hideous eaty sort of death.

      I found your point about dogs interesting - I swim in the beach not thinking about sharks, but I get scared if I see a large dog. The reason being that I’ve been bitten by a dog, but not by a shark.

    • Shawn says:

      05:35pm | 02/11/10

      Once I saw a shark at the aquarium in Sydney in the 80’s, it was only a little one and they had it in a little petting tank so the kiddies could feel its skin. My little brothers and I took turns distracting the employee, so we could hit it with our thongs.
      It didt even try to bite the thong, but he might not have been that hungry.

    • Tombowler says:

      08:01pm | 02/11/10

      Good on ya shawn. You and your brother seem like likely types to join an expedition I’m leading next year.

      The good ship “Nixon” will leave port with sixty thousand litres of fish oil, a Browning heavy machine gun on the bow and several cases of dynamite.
      We will eradicate any sharks or greenpeace hippies we come across. The ‘Nixon’ will also be equipped with 62mm cannon in case the ‘sea shepherd’ or ‘rainbow warrior’ should seek to disrupt our noble work. We might also have a crack at the Greens party room but thats another story.

      My “inconvenient truth” for the sharkers is gonna be a goodly sized chunk of heated lead…

    • Jenni says:

      12:40am | 03/11/10

      More people are killed by bees every year than by sharks. The hysteria surrounded the occasional - and it really IS only occasional - shark “attack” is rather pathetic.

      I object to the use of the word “attack” in these cases anyway (which is why I’ve put it in inverted commas” ... the word “attack” implies a concious intention to cause harm. The shark is not deliberatley going out of its way to hurt humans, it is simply doing what comes naturally ... if you swim in the ocean - especially in areas where this known shark activity, as is the case of the latest incident in WA - then you need to accept the risks associated.

    • Gregg says:

      01:12am | 03/11/10

      First of all Matt as some have mentioned, for hype we always have the media to thank and then that will remind some who have seen the movie of Jaws, it’s sequel in the river perhaps even more a reminder of how to be aware of where you will be swimming.

      I do not know that so many people will actually hate sharks but fear the thought of an attack certainly and though the chances may be low relative to other ways to be harmed, little thought is probably accorded those because they are seen as more events that can occur just going about normal life whereas going swimming in the sea is something you have to make a definite decision to do.
      Yet, still plenty of people do it despite all that media hype so perhaps there is not even so many fearing too much.

      If you want something that fear will clear the water, along northern coast lines from about November to May it’ll be the various stingers and they don’t have teeth!

    • Mikko says:

      10:12am | 03/11/10

      These poor misunderstood creatures obviously mistook the sailors from the USS Indianapolis for fur seals:
      “Of the 900 who made it into the water, only 317 remained alive. After almost five days of constant shark attacks, starvation, terrible thirst, suffering from exposure and their wounds, the men of the Indianapolis were at last rescued from the sea.” http://www.ussindianapolis.org/story.htm
      The chances of death in a plane crash are also probably statistically pretty slim but it doesn’t stop media reporting a light plane crash anywhere on the globe. Rather than blaming the media, a campaign to have shark nets removed from beaches during the winter whale migration might be a better cause.

    • lokect says:

      01:00pm | 03/11/10

      “You are 80 times more likely to die in a drowning accident, 11 times more likely to die by being struck by lightening, and 3 times more likely to die from bee stings”

      As I’m not an infant and I can swim, so I am not going to drown.  I don’t work outside so I won’t get hit by lightning, and I’m not allergic to bees.

      But on average, 25 sharks A DAY are turned away from Adelaide beaches in summer.  And the vast majority are Great white sharks, the most aggressive to humans.

      I think I know which is more dangerous.

    • Talitha says:

      03:42am | 05/11/10

      good article, but utterly ridiculous opening line.

      there have been three shark attacks off the coast of WA in recent months, but i’ve not heard of one incident of being bitten by someone from new york.

      It’s probably also worth noting that a bite from a shark is far more painful and far more likely to result in your death than a bite from someone on the upper east side.

    • Laura says:

      10:55pm | 16/12/10

      Really good article, Matt ! People have to look past those stereotypes of man eating sharks, enhanced by Jaws (seriously, I don’t think sharks roar that loudly..) and try to consider it from their point of view. Its an ethical debate and most people will probably be all destroy the shark and gain profits from it.. but yes, once they’ve read this article.. their perspectives will change.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter