Reflecting on the responses to my original piece in The Punch Instead of sandstone unis, what about iron ore ones? I was struck by the extent to which the respondents viewed university education stereotypically; on the one hand as an elitist institution, out of touch with society’s needs; on the other, as a factory for young people who should be trained to do useful stuff, like engineering.

Goodbye blue sky, we're going down the mines! Pic: Supplied

The thought that an Arts education had anything to offer was broadly dismissed. People seemed more interested in comparing the philanthropic culture of individuals in the United States business sector to Australian philanthropy, but the notion that a company could also be a social actor was not accepted.

Support university incomes and you guarantee university flexibility to respond to the expectations of their community.

This independence has made some US universities great. In an article in The Australian on the release of the Higher Education policy from the Business Council of Australia in March 2011, one of the key points was the growing need for graduates with attributes in so-called soft or generic skills like leadership, teamwork and communication, not just supplying engineers and scientists.

Taskforce member Mr Paul Dougas (CEO of engineering and environmental consulting firm Sinclair Knight Merz) said:

“It is more about a broadening of the curricula to produce people who can work on a range of issues, solve problems and work in teams…

That is, a diverse education focused on producing graduates across all disciplines who know how to contribute in a world overwhelmed by information; where managing complex problems and making good decisions are vital skills.

For example, there will be a need to ensure that social and economic and technical/environmental solutions are able to adapt to the challenges that emerge from the inevitability of climate change and population growth. Universities are a bulwark that communities implicitly rely upon, from where they draw down on the values of learning as the basis for coping with and driving change.

The increasingly volatile nature of employment and investment patterns in Australia requires a countervailing source of social continuity, a place to keep and nurture underpinning values and human assets, which can strengthened and drawn upon if required.

Educational institutions are such a place, providing a buffer against the effects of unfortunate economic management, reactionary policy making, or shocks to international systems of credit supply or food security.

The key benefit for the universities from the injection of funds by the mining companies is release from the yoke of government compliance culture, towards a more creative educational model. I think it is a propitious time to change the ‘rules of the game’. Propitious, because Government and governance mechanisms are in active contest, and uncertainty in economic futures and new carbon management has created a volatile state of flux, such that the endowment of Adelaide’s universities by Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton would be a game-changer for Governments and perhaps the public’s perceptions of their future in a broader sense.

For example, the three SA universities have a combined academic salary bill of $465 million per annum. The income from $10 billion at 5 per cent return on investment is $500 million per annum The universities have existing financial structures that could accommodate the endowments. Auditing is already quite rigorous.

I suggest that endowments made from the extra-ordinary profits in the current iron ore and coal trade, in transactions made directly with the three universities, would result in a massive, positive public relations impact.  It would immediately re-frame debate about the Mineral Resources Rent Tax, and re-cast mining companies as constructive corporate citizens able to be trusted and expose government rent-seeking.

Indeed, why shouldn’t mining companies deal directly with universities? Are we so prejudiced by our perceptions of miners as ruthless self-serving entities that we dismiss their capacity to accept the logic of their roles as social actors who are part of the Australian social fabric?

Why is it assumed that universities are so craven or such poor negotiators that they would surrender their key asset - independence, impartiality, trust – for money? Universities know what to teach and how to educate. The Government and miners have already agreed that a portion of the fantastic mining wealth should be returned to the Australian society.

The only difference is that some of the largest social actors in our Australian community might decide to work together directly for mutual and broader social benefit into the foreseeable future.

The endowments would be a straightforward, de-politicised transaction with maximum effect since there would be no middlemen or administrators to take their 20 per cent.
Is it possible that the mining companies’ reputations would be altered in positive if perhaps subtle ways in the eyes of their key south and east Asian customers whose cultures value education more highly than we do in Australia? The endowment income could be used, for example, in subsidising the costs for overseas students to study in Australia, a strategic political investment for Australia and in the health of Australia’s education services sector, especially given the likelihood of a continuing strong Australian Dollar.

But it would not require a Government program; it wouldn’t require Government to intervene at all. Back to the Future: the Colombo Plan circa 2012!

As an aside, in proposing this plan and if carried forward, there are a myriad of possible influences on the psyche of those engaged in economic management, for which, such transactions would constitute a paradigmatic shift in the way we value the role of business. Perhaps most importantly and particularly it would signal to the financial sector that a return to common sense relationships between livelihoods and a life well lived was happening.

The Global Financial Crisis and climate change have demonstrated that ‘growth forever’ is now a failed, flawed, philosophy.

The mining companies have it within their power to initiate a ‘new game’, to ‘change the rules’ that would allow the return to rich and intensive teaching and learning. That is, a way of educating all manner of people that has stood the test of time and which transforms social and human capital into productive, critical-thinking individuals in whatever futures await.

Most commented

23 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Kipling says:

      06:22am | 26/03/12

      Look that all sound just peachy. Of course, the idea of what is effectively “sponsored” education lends itself to the overwhelming notion of dictated education.

      If a university is beholden to a large financial interest of any breed, that large financial interest will at some point adversely impact on the supposed independence of said university. That is how things work unfortunately.

    • acotrel says:

      06:51am | 26/03/12

      I can see a good side to that.  When I was studying I had the foolish idea that tertiary institutions werre in touch with the future needs of industry and society generally.  I found out that many university lecturers are simply ‘lunchtime heros’, out of touch with reality !

    • Kipling says:

      07:07am | 26/03/12

      Be that as it may Acco, I look at the deterioration of the Union movement being effective and engaging to the actual workforce (you know, the people who are suppose to make up the union) and the impact that university sponsored education has had.
      Once, Union leaders actually came from the “shopfloor” so they were in touch with other like minded members and actually were on the button with most (not all) union activities. The same cannot be said in modern times.
      That is a twofold problem, one, the sponsored education has most definitely got some union heavy weights who are not actually union oriented and two an effective dumbing down of working Australia so that the overall understanding and subsequent desire to be a part of unions has dropped off chronically.

      There is the pay off for your sponsored education.

      Wages and conditions for workers will diminish further.

    • marley says:

      07:34am | 26/03/12

      @Kipling - I don’t have a problem with the concept of the mining companies endowing schools of engineering, or the maths and physics departments, or the like.  I can’t see any risk of “dictated education” when it comes to the hard sciences, and to fields in which it is in the miners’ interests to make sure that the training and education is of the highest caliber.

      Where I have a problem is with the author’s concept that the miners’ should finance other fields of education but that their relationship to the recipient of their money would be apoliticial and non-proprietary.  That’s nonsense and you and I both know it.  They would expect the money to be spent in certain ways, and universities are just as venal as other institutions in doing what will bring in the most money.

    • Kipling says:

      08:03am | 26/03/12

      @ Marley, good points. I kind of think that if mining companies actually want to do that (re: Maths, Engineering etc) they may be able to set up their own specialised training centres. Clearly, they have the resources.

      They could then handpick the applicants they want, hell, even charge fees if need be. Of course, offering the training as part ofa contracted traineeship would most likely be far more attractive.

    • Jane2 says:

      10:07am | 26/03/12

      TAFE’s get “endorsements” from industry all the time. It results in students having the skills that the industry requires verses a lot of knowledge that is 10 plus years behind the times.

      To often at university you have people like my father, a businessman who retired to acaedmia. He may have had an idea of how things worked at the point he retired but he has since lost contact with all his business network. What was groundbreaking 20 years ago is accepted general knowledge or accepted falsehood today.

      If universities dont get industry involvement then the courses, regardles whether they are engineering or archeology, all become causes in ancient history.

      Bring it on.

    • Tubesteak says:

      07:39am | 26/03/12

      “The Global Financial Crisis and climate change have demonstrated that ‘growth forever’ is now a failed, flawed, philosophy.”

      Actually, the GFC didn’t show us that. Maybe climate change does. The GFC taught us that government intervention in the market place needs oversight and foresight so that their impacts are tempered. For example, creating an overheated property market on cheap credit and no regulatory oversight of the banks is a bad idea.

      Also, who says universities are independent. Firm Spy recently has made rumblings that if government no longer restricts course access that law schools will produce more law students than necessary without regard of what this does in the market. This isn’t going to end well.

      Moreover, universities already teach leadership and teamwork. Many of my courses involved group assignments. Maybe this isn’t the case in engineering but it certainly was in the business school.

    • year of the dragon says:

      08:03am | 26/03/12

      “The Global Financial Crisis and climate change have demonstrated that ‘growth forever’ is now a failed, flawed, philosophy.”

      How so?

      China and India have continued to industrlalise at a rapid rate. The US stockmarket is within spitting distance of all time highs suggesting that investors believe that the future is bright. And innovation and development continues unabated despite the GFC.

      There are lessons to be learned from the GFC. It has shown that economic cycles are real and that poor government policies have a significant and meaningful impact on people’s lives. But most of all, it has shown that despite bad governments humans are resilient and innovative.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      09:05am | 26/03/12

      Well you build and innovate when times are good so when times are bad other industries come along and pick up the slack. Problem here in Australia is we are simple people who are blinded by slogans and surpluses and this is where America kills us by being go getters, building big things and having entrepreneurial spirit although at times taking capitalism too far.

      As I said in the original article if the mining companies and the individuals running it were smart they would invest massively in Uni’s and sponsor uni places in Engineering, Science etc instead they worry about suing everyone and everything.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:05am | 26/03/12

      Alas, resources are finite….

    • year of the dragon says:

      10:17am | 26/03/12

      SimonFromLakemba says:10:05am | 26/03/12

      “Well you build and innovate when times are good so when times are bad other industries come along and pick up the slack.”

      I don’t recall anyone suggesting that the mining industry receive disproportionate support when times were tough for them.

      But yes, I agree.

      “at times taking capitalism too far. “

      Really? How?

      “if the mining companies and the individuals running it were smart they would invest massively in Uni’s and sponsor uni places in Engineering, Science etc”

      A very interesting idea with real merit.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      10:54am | 26/03/12

      @YOTD

      ‘Really? How?’

      Minimum wage, outsourcing etc. I think Australia has it about right to be honest, making a buck whilst having morals when doing it.

      ‘A very interesting idea with real merit’

      Once they graduate they agree to work for at least say 2 years with the company whilst the company takes a part of their income to repay the investment in their degree.

      It just part of a bigger grip wishing people would be more opportunistic when thinking about the benefit of Australia.

    • rodney allsworth says:

      09:04am | 26/03/12

      the highest of education skills are good when used by morally responsable persons, because the highly educated will -as we so often see- create people who only prey on others in society to benifit themselves, without a solid moral grounding, the epicentre of a life -is self-this of course leads to self interest-, so common today, what has created this is the -so called- new world paradigm- with the UN created philosophy of a -VALUES FREE, ALL VALUES ARE EQUAL, WHICH IS THE CORE OF -EQUALITY-AND HUMAN RIGHTS. what else can we expect from society, the whole world operates on a me,and mine mindset, becaue their are no values, the fact that morals and truth cannot be superseded by law makers and the elite who make them means that, we are left with no morals and no true justice, considering that law and courts can only ever come up with -LEGAL OPINIONS-BASED ON LAW, so to say that we need social skills,taught in unis, is simply to say, we need more legal savvy students entering the workplace, and that in itself is the essence of workplaces as we know it today, just ask employers who are faced with employers who set out to do the wrong thing and the employer cops the responsability for it and has to cover the costs done and quite often even has to pay compo to the offender,now thats a legal right,BUT ITS NOT THE TRUTH, when we hear that children dont even know where milk or yoghurt comes from and many leave school unable to read or write, really means we should stick to teaching the real basics to students, get them to understand well the natural order of life, and not that the internet style of life in society, and the real skills that enable them to take on any challenge they so desire in life.

      rod qld

    • Migraine says:

      10:02am | 26/03/12

      “The thought that an Arts education had anything to offer was broadly dismissed.”

      I did a Science degree and experienced several periods of protracted unemployment. Other than the local Catholic high school, I never found an employer who thought the degree qualified me for anything. Despite considerable and broad experience on top.

      I later did an Arts degree - and a doctorate - and I have not been unemployed since: I have a bloody good salary and more than once have been able to take my pick of several jobs on offer. The Arts degree made me a better thinker, communicator, analyst, writer ... it instilled exactly the kind of generic or soft skills the BCA and other say they’re after.

      My experience is not unique.

      Plus, the Arts degree has left me with a richer intellectual and cultural life outside work than was previously the case.

      So to those who dismiss the idea than an Arts education has anything to offer I say: yah boo sucks.

    • Sean James says:

      10:23am | 26/03/12

      so 3 years of University to learn: yah boo sucks

      “better thinker, communicator, analyst, writer” it obviously didn’t work

    • marley says:

      10:57am | 26/03/12

      @Migraine - is suspect you have a richer intellectual and cultural life outside work now than you did back then because you’re older and have more experience.

      An Arts degree can indeed open up new worlds - but so can a Science or Engineering degree.  I know a fair number of MAs and PhDs who are poor communicators and analysts, and a number of BEngs and BScs who are the converse.  It depends far more on the nature of the individual than of the degree.

    • Your name:shinydonkey says:

      02:39pm | 26/03/12

      @Sean James - need I point out that the art and subtlety of Migraine’s last sentence are lost on you?

    • Sean James says:

      10:21am | 27/03/12

      @shinydonkey - Yes I noticed and it was pretty lame, bit like your handle - hee-haw

    • Kassandra says:

      01:10pm | 26/03/12

      The financial involvement of the pharmaceutical industry in medical research has been a disaster, to the extent that the professional institutions are now trying to distance themselves from industry. It is important that we don’t make the same mistakes in other fields. I am not arguing against the idea altogether but we must learn from mistakes.

    • Migraine says:

      10:02am | 27/03/12

      @Sean James - it was more like 12 years. Most of it HECS-liable, and all paid off. Pay attention.

    • Sean James says:

      10:24am | 27/03/12

      @ Headache - Wow - 12 Years of sucking of the system, do you want a GOLD Medal now or what?

    • otheleBal says:

      05:47pm | 27/03/12

      smile

    • Migraine says:

      01:05pm | 28/03/12

      My apologies to all for feeding the troll.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@TheStalwart an analyst in Sydney said it was a "sad day" http://t.co/vh4Yu4OgDD. I think he was just exhausted and gave up analyzing

ToryShepherd

@CatherineDeveny @sydwritersfest A wobble

Paul Colgan

RT @NASA: Amazing views from the International Space Station of Pavlof Volcano erupting in Alaska. http://t.co/vqBkkiOful

Paul Colgan

US Google Doodle features a girl's touching depiction of her father's return from Iraq http://t.co/4LiRFOntTY

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter