In 1971, Australia converted from the Imperial measurement system to metric. That was 39 years ago.

The new building code measurement for door frames - the John Eales. Picture: Adam Knott

In fact, the last babies to be weighed and registered in pounds will turn 40 next year – happy birthday to you. And as far as I know anyone who started school from 1971 onwards learned metric as the only measurement system in Australia.

I didn’t ever learn Imperial at school. I only learned conversion rates when I had a child. Up until then I’d bought a kilo of fish, 500 grams of ham and 2 kilograms of potatoes.

When you have a child everyone asks how much the child weighed at birth. But if you give them the weight in kilograms (and they know how heavy a kilogram is, they go to the gym and do arm work, they buy potatoes, they put flea treatments on their 4.5kg cat) they will ask you what that weight is in pounds.

I am mystified that rather than telling people there are 2.2 pounds per kilogram, perhaps they could work it out themselves? These new mothers sit down and calculate their baby’s weight in pounds and from that day on, they know the weight of their child in metric and Imperial. Clearly the happy hormones are still working for them.

I assume the phenomenon of reverting to pounds to explain a baby’s weight comes down to our mothers. When I told my mother my baby was 3.85kg she had to take a moment to calculate it out before she said: “That’s small compared with you. You were 10 pounds 2 ounces! I’m still in pain.”

This weird love of Imperial stretches to our height. I’m 5 feet 10 inches according to my parents. But my drivers’ license says I’m 175cm. No one gets the concept that 175cm is tall. But five-ten is tall.

Maybe we should create a new measurement: the John Eales. Eales is the height of a doorway (according to Peter Fitzsimmons), which in the building code standards is 2metres. Got that? Well, I’m 25cm shorter than John Eales.

I enjoy programs from the UK, in particular Top Gear. I am constantly calculating the miles per hour to kilometres per hour. I love the challenge The Biggest Loser UK gives me to calculate the person’s weight into metric before the banner comes across the screen. (There are 14 pounds per stone, 2.2 pounds per kilogram…. Oh, dear.)

So I’m ok to accept that people of a certain generation will continue to think in Imperial – my parents being two examples. But I will not accept the use of inches or feet by industry. More and more this is creeping into Australia.

There was a time when it was illegal to buy a tape measure with inches and feet on it because the government was determined that Australia would adopt the new metric system.

Patchworkers, sewers and knitters depending on patterns from the United States were the hardest hit by this move, so the government gave in to the craft vote and re-introduced the dual measuring tapes. You don’t want to mess with those stitch ‘n’ bitch women.

I was driving behind a taxi specifically for the disabled this morning. There was a sticker on the back of this vehicle – “Do not park within 8 feet”. Remember, Australia has had 39 years to get used to metric. They should know by now that 2½ metres is John Eales with a child on his shoulders.

I’ve been repainting a couple of rooms and doing feature walls, so I bought that blue tape to ensure I got a good straight line. That blue tape comes in 1 inch width rolls.

One brand of paintbrush comes nicely packaged in cardboard but its size is marked in Imperial. I picked up one for edgework but it was 3 inches wide. Clearly it was the wrong brush for fine work near the edges, I wanted a 3cm brush.

The tape should be marked 2.5cm. The paintbrush should be marked 7.5cm. That’s that. I don’t want to hear that painters work in imperial, they don’t. They buy their paint in litres not quarts. They calculate wall sizes in metric, so they can buy 2.5cm tape or 7.5cm brushes.

This neo-imperialism is ridiculous. I don’t know if it’s bending to the US or laziness on the part of Australian subsidiaries in repackaging or marking products sold in Australia, but it must stop.

A little further down the hardware shop, masonry bits are sold with the two measurements on them. If that blue tape has to have its size in Imperial, it should be marked in metric as well.

And the only reason we should be talking about feet, is after shoes are thrown.

89 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      05:55am | 28/10/10

      ‘This neo-imperialism is ridiculous. I don’t know if it’s bending to the US or laziness on the part of Australian subsidiaries in repackaging or marking products sold in Australia, but it must stop.’

      You can take comfort in the fact that the whole US aircraft industry uses Imperial units!  It’s even caused aircraft to fall from the sky, when metric fuel gauges have been used, and people have confused the two systems of units.  There is no problem as long as it’s always clearly stated which system of units are in use, and stick to it.  MIxing units is a recipe for disaster!

    • Aaron says:

      12:02am | 29/10/10

      Too true, I’m an aerospace engineering student, we get given problems in imperial (which I understand, but still think it’s silly), I just do conversions to metric, apply the equations, and the convert the final answer back. My lecturers often say “You work for Airbus in metric in the morning, and Boeing in imperial in the afternoon”

    • AC says:

      06:34am | 28/10/10

      I am soooooooo with you on the baby thing. It drives me insane (and I am 40)

    • TG says:

      07:11am | 28/10/10

      Or perhaps you should be buying Australian Made and Australian Owned painting products.  Especially considering the measurements traditionally used by tradies are measured in millimetres!

    • Reg says:

      05:37pm | 28/10/10

      Exactly TG. The centimetre is the most useless and error prone thing about metric. In fact they are an unnecessary genuflection to the half-inch.

      I’m old and the one thing I cannot get in my mind is my height, or that of anyone else, in centimetres. I can talk in micro-metres millimetres and metres but no-one talks in 1/100 of kilometres and that’s what a centimeter is to a metre.

      A room may be 7.2 metres wide but it’s more often 7200 millimetres if you don’t want someone to accidentally build you a gnat sized sleeping space.

    • Peter says:

      07:38am | 28/10/10

      Well, I don’t envy all those librarians who are going to have to make erases and add, in its place, “Lady Chatterley gets a good 15.24cm”.

    • muddy boots says:

      07:47am | 28/10/10

      Yep - had to put up with this most of my life & i’m 42.  & the USA is the biggest offender to me - they still talk in pounds & inches - and seeing as they dominate the FB, or Twitter lives of so many thats probably why people keep using the terms - to stay “normal”.

    • Reg says:

      05:46pm | 28/10/10

      I keep pointing out to my US friends that the dollar has always been metric but them they point to a “quarter.” Perhaps it’s time Australia melted down those gigantic fifty cents coins and introduced a quarter instead. But wait ...

      I always think of the flight that ran out of fuel in Canada because the fuel loader used litres instead of gallons and loaded about a quarter of the fuel needed.

    • ibast says:

      08:17am | 28/10/10

      Spare a thought for US based Scientists and Engineers.  To work around a US imperial system you have to factor in all sorts of odd constants into to equations that are straight forward and obvious in a metric system.  Talking to an MIT student once, he was in the habit of converting everything to metric, working out his solution, then converting back to US imperial.

    • neil says:

      10:14am | 28/10/10

      I have worked for several US and UK engineering companies and they all converted to metric back in the 1970’s, they had no choice really if you are working around the world you need one system and the engineering powerhouses, Germany and Japan are metric.

      Though it is common for them to discuss issues in imperial then design in metric. MPH becomes m/s, gallons become litres etc.

    • Tom Daly says:

      08:19am | 28/10/10

      I am caught in a netherworld of measures and weights. It his hard to adapt to something , quite different , to that which we were familiar with in our formative years..  I have no problem ordering my meat by kilos , but when it comes to coming to grips with some of the other metric terms,  I am miles from nowhere. Perhaps I need a “forby two” across the noggin.  I still need
      nails in inches and drills in fractions , use a spirit level (lasers burn) and now and then enjoy a pint of beer (whatever happened to ponies). I am an unconverted tragic to imperial measure. If police are looking for someone 178 cms tall , I am unsure if they are after a midget or a monster. At this stage in my life you can bet pounds to peanuts, I will not quite get that grip required.  Please excuse me if I invade your space, I’m unsure of the metric distance deemed acceptable, it used to be a “coupla feet”. They were given an inch then took a kilometre, leaving me in confused Limbo.

    • acotrel says:

      08:27am | 28/10/10

      I think the best example of American stupidity is the minus sign which they use in thermodynamics, which changes the whole interpretation of entropy!

    • Sheedy's Left Foot says:

      08:41am | 28/10/10

      I think we should scrap the metric and imperial system and go with the highly effective Tabloid Newspaper Measurement Scheme.

      Money is measured in number of hospitals that could be bought with it
      Volume is measured in units of olympic swimming pools
      Length is measured in units of buses
      Area is measured in units of football fields
      Height in units of eiffel towers

      Its a fairly simple and easy to understand system and is already in use across the whole of the world.

    • Punters Pal says:

      11:27am | 28/10/10

      And lets not forget old MCG measurement, as was read in the asylum seeker thread - it takes 20 years to fill the MCG with all the boatpeople.

    • Macca says:

      12:12pm | 28/10/10

      @Sheedy’s Left foot, whilst that works, you also need your sub-measurements. i.e. Millimetres / centremetres.

      So, School Canteens / Hospitals
      Rainwater tank / Swimming Pools
      Motorbikes / Buses
      Netball Courts / Football Fields
      John Eales / Eiffel Towers

    • Reg says:

      05:57pm | 28/10/10

      I thought you had it then Sheedy before you tripped over your right foot. Measurement should be related to the sizes of A4 and A3 paper. It’s so obvious I can’t believe it hasn’t been done before.

      Then there was the Australian “bag” of sugar from my youth. None of my teachers could tell me why a bag of sugar weighed 22 pounds. I know now. The world worked in ten kilo bags even before WWII.  Right?

    • Dieter Moeckel says:

      08:43am | 28/10/10

      Just wait until China gets into the act and we start buying land not in roods, not quarter acres, or in 0.1 hectares nor in 1 000 square metres but in 2 mus.

    • Dave says:

      10:58am | 28/10/10

      Aah, Dieter, China uses the metric system. I know - I’ve been there many times…

    • Denman says:

      08:44am | 28/10/10

      It’s still amazingly common in the building trade to mix both scales in the one sentence. Just ring the timber yard and order a pack of 8x2 sleepers 3m long.

    • acotrel says:

      09:00am | 28/10/10

      The best one is when the fuel man at the airport fills your plane with litres instead of gallons? I watch ‘Air Crash Investigation’ on National Geo Channel.

    • Major Malfunction says:

      08:45am | 28/10/10

      So, that makes you 10 inches shorter than John Eales.

    • Colleen A says:

      08:53am | 28/10/10

      I can only understand babies weights in pounds and ounces but wouldn’t know what I weigh in anything other than kilos. I cannot work out how tall anyone is if they tell me in centimetres though, I am strictly a feet & inches girl.

    • Salec says:

      09:04am | 28/10/10

      If you’re going to complain, you should maybe get your conversions right. There are 25.4mm to an inch, so if you are 5 foot 10 inches tall you are actually 177.8 cm tall, not 175, it makes a difference you know. So if as you say your drivers licence says you are 175cm tall, you are actually 5 foot 9!

    • iansand says:

      09:42am | 28/10/10

      I like exact metric measurements, to a couple of decimal places, that are obviously conversions from imperial estimates.

    • neil says:

      10:48am | 28/10/10

      You mean 5 foot 8 and 57/64th’s or 897 thou if you want to be pedantic.

      How about 61/64th’s of a fathom, or maybe 22/64th’s of a pole. Confusing isn’t it.

    • Sam Chowder says:

      09:13am | 28/10/10

      Male appendages work better in imperial

    • ibast says:

      09:34am | 28/10/10

      The problem is with men always telling women “that really is 6 inches” women tend get other measurements out of scale.

    • Reg says:

      06:01pm | 28/10/10

      So that’s the solution, I need an Imperial partner.

    • Chris L says:

      06:11pm | 29/10/10

      But with metric you get a higher number. 15cm sounds better than six inches even if it’s still a fib.

    • Amy says:

      09:13am | 28/10/10

      Nice Article, Julia.  So true!

      The biggest problem I have with the discrepancies over the two systems is with clothing sizes.  Standard clothing sizes are different in imperial countries in comparison to metric.  Bras all seem to be measured the same way - according to the imperial system (for example, a US 32 is an Australian size 10, a US 34 is an Australian size 12).  The larger US number is also the size in inches around the bottom band, so there are 2 inches between the sizes - and since you can generally depend on that sizing, they all (or mostly) seem to be standardised. 

      But with other types of clothing, you find that clothing sizes differ because of where you shop, which international destination that shop gets their clothes made and therefore, which system of measurement that country uses.  I’m certain that this is why it’s so much easier to find clothes that fit me better when I’m in America, and my size seems to vary from shop to shop (and just occasionally aisle to aisle) here.

    • monkeytypist says:

      09:16am | 28/10/10

      I don’t understand it either - people in our society use metric every day - why do they have to go to the effort of converting babies into pounds?  It means absolutely nothing to me.

    • Schmavo says:

      09:29am | 28/10/10

      Lindsay Fox was quoted the other day, he drove along the Monash freeway for 3 miles? This, from the king of transport.

    • neil says:

      09:30am | 28/10/10

      I am constantly irritated with people who can’t use metric units, it’s very common in the hardware industry, you ask for a 75mm screw and the salesman pulls out a calcutator then says “you mean 3 inches”, no I mean 75mm. I can easily work in feet and inches but when I get one of these bozo’s I convert everything they say to metric so they have to convert it back. Timber, 4 by 2, “do you mean 100 by 50?”, sheeting, “do you have 2400 by 1200 3ply?” their reply, “the 8 by 4 sheets are over there”, “but I want the 2400 by 1200.”

      And why is it that people (bogans) that watch V8 racing and are way to young to have ever have used imperial units have to convert kilowatts to horse power to understand what you are telling them. Actually they have to ask me what it is in HP because they can’t use a calculator.

    • Nicole says:

      11:47am | 28/10/10

      That’s nasty. I like it though.

    • Gregg says:

      09:32am | 28/10/10

      Julia, you have two problems it would seem
      ” Maybe we should create a new measurement: the John Eales. Eales is the height of a doorway (according to Peter Fitzsimmons), which in the building code standards is 2metres. Got that? Well, I’m 25cm shorter than John Eales. “
      I was going to say you’re still a little short A but seeing as it’s Julia, you may have been a hit with the Netballer teams and the knees could suffer.

      Secondly, stop buying Chinese products for someone keeps talking to them about feet and inches and in their efforts to please and confuse they’ll obviously trend to the latter.

      Some mothers are sisters in pain or at least are when a healthy lad of 13 lb. 4 oz pops out at about spot on 6 kg.
      But keep learning the conversions and it could even improve the Soduko capacity.

    • Jess says:

      09:33am | 28/10/10

      LOL I do the same thing! I learnt that 5-6 pounds was a small baby and 9-10 pounds is a big baby so if you tell me what it is in kg I have no idea if it was big or small without converting it!
      That being said if you told me a adults body weight in pounds I’d say, but whats that in kilos?

    • jess says:

      09:36am | 28/10/10

      For babies - I would assume its almost out of 10 scale…anything under 5 is small - 6-7 is averageish 10 is a whopper 10/10! Then there the 11 pounders - 11/10!

    • S M says:

      09:46am | 28/10/10

      I was born well and truly after 1971!  If someone tells me a weight in pounds (especially when it comes to babies!) I have to ask what that is in kilos. 

      Fortunately, I at least know that a foot is about the same length as a 30cm ruler,  but don’t expect me to approximate 10 feet - that’s a lot of 30cm rulers I have to imagine lined up! 

      Though I must confess, I love my measuring tape in centimetres and inches, though it could be in red and blue dots for all I care.  Sometimes the inch marking is an easier mark to follow than the corresponding millimetre marking.

    • Gregg says:

      12:01am | 29/10/10

      If you kind of multiply that 30 cm. by 10 which is easy enough for some of us you will have 300 cm or 3M.
      If you’re planning on laying out a 10 foot wide driveway, don’t be a bunny and either head to Bunnings for a tape or just tape two 30 cm. rulers to your thongs and pace it out wearing stubbies while you drink from one.

    • TimB says:

      10:28am | 28/10/10

      I agree that much of the blame can probably be attributed to the United States. Many of these issues would probably go away within 50 years if they just got off their ass and made the switch. Highly doubt it will happen though, they’re way too entrenched & stubborn to change.

      I wonder if they realise how backward it makes them look. This map (representing the only countries that havn’t adopted metric) is pretty telling.

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Metric_system.png

      Burma and Liberia. What wonderful company they keep.

    • ibast says:

      11:15am | 28/10/10

      You would have thought they would have converted after they crash a $125 million satellite into the surface of Mars.

    • Macca says:

      12:17pm | 28/10/10

      That picture is Gold!

    • Shaun says:

      01:31pm | 28/10/10

      And how many spaceships have we managed to successfully land on the surface of other cellestial bodies with our clearly superior metric system?

    • neil says:

      02:23pm | 28/10/10

      Shaun,

      NASA works in metric, as do the American automotive, electronics, architectural, construction and most other technology based industries. Even the US military is mostly metric to comply with NATO.

    • Steve says:

      10:37am | 28/10/10

      So one calorie is defined to be the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of one cubic centimeter of water by one degree celsius - what is non metric about this? Why MUST we convert to Kilojoules

    • Mick says:

      11:06am | 28/10/10

      The Calorie dates back to the 1800’s when they thought that heat was a liquid.  A Calorie is, sorry was 1 unit of that liquid.  Mr Joule was the man who indentified that heat was not a liquid but in fact energy. 

      That’s why all data on labelling is in joules whilst all quasi-scientific diet sales pitches use the Calorie.

    • ibast says:

      11:10am | 28/10/10

      What’s the air pressure?  What’s starting temperature?  Also is it a gram calorie or a kilogram calorie?  And then how do you compare it to other forms of energy?

      That is why the joule is the standard unit.

      Also, the cm is the most ungodly unit.  Those that have to work with length. work with millimeters or meters.  Centimeters is something we teach kids because it is much more tangible, but stick it in an equation with other units and it’s not hard to get the wrong answer.

      How tangible a unit is goes towards why inches (in particular) and pounds are still commonly referred to.  “It’s about 2 inches long” registers in most peoples brains more readily than “it’s about 50mm long” or ” it’s about 0.05m long).  Using centimeters alleviates this a bit but it’s still not great.

    • Gregg says:

      12:08am | 29/10/10

      @ibast
      I think what registers in peoples minds might just depend on their age or stubborness.
      Some of us at the right age to have learnt in imperial but not too old to learn metric can use both easily enough.

      I do thogh miss my threepences and sixpences in the Christmas Pudding.

    • Dan says:

      10:50am | 28/10/10

      Anything made in the U.S. or made for the U.S. market uses SAE measurements (can we PLEASE stop saying “imperial” like a bunch of slaves?).  A lot of standard sizes are actually inch sizes.  e.g. a one inch wide ribbon is actually manufactured to be an inch wide and it is NOT 25mm wide even if some lazy people like to think so.  A one-eighth diameter bolt is nothing at all like a 3mm or even a 3.2mm diameter bolt:  just try putting the same nut onto both of them and you’ll see they’re manufactured with different thread pitches.  Half-inch thick steel is actually half an inch thick, which is NOT 13mm or even 12.5mm (it’s actually 12.7mm).  If something is manufactured in SAE sizes (which is a perfectly legitimate measurement system and managed to put man on the moon), what kind of elitist tosser would insist on expressing the sizes (inaccurately) in his or her “preferred” system?

    • Bob says:

      12:36pm | 28/10/10

      Wouldn’t be from the US Dan?

      Keep clinging on mate!

    • neil says:

      02:50pm | 28/10/10

      Dan, guess what the SAE don’t use SAE measurements anymore.

      SAE standards don’t define units of measurement, they are for things like bolt sizes and steel specifications.

      The USA uses “United States customary system” which is loosely based on the pre-Imperial “English units” system.

      Heres a simple explanation of how it works.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:English_length_units_graph.png

      Who would have guessed there are 120 twips in a poppyseed and 3 poppyseeds to a barleycorn.

    • Jono says:

      11:10am | 28/10/10

      Confusion between the two can cause major problems - reminds me of this smile

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider

      Basically they got the conversion wrong and didnt give this passanger jet enough fuel!

    • Mr Subramanian says:

      11:24am | 28/10/10

      Miles are rubbish. Pounds are ridiculous. Gallaons are garbage. But feet & inches is actually a very good measure for height, because the granuality of the untis suits the range of human heights very very well.

    • Darryl Price says:

      11:37am | 28/10/10

      They could have avoided all the controversy at the time metric was introduced by just waiting until all the old people died…

    • Steve says:

      11:48am | 28/10/10

      I support the metric system every inch of the way…  smile

    • Rohan says:

      11:49am | 28/10/10

      I help my Dad do the fencingon the farm in crack my mum up watching us.  Dad will be at the end of the fence line yelling to me to “move the post 2 inches to the right .”  I never learning the imperial system would be yelling “what a inch” back.  he would then say “1/12th of a foot.” I would then yell back that dose,‘t help” this would go on for a bit in the end i usually give up and just pick up the post and guess.

    • antman says:

      02:39pm | 28/10/10

      While we’re making sure that everyone is standardising to metric, can we make the use of English compulsory too? Oh, and dates with the date preceding the month and not in the American arse (not ass) about system?

    • Nicole says:

      11:52am | 28/10/10

      My husband talks inches and feet. It annoys the hell out of me and he’s only 44. And he still talks miles, but I reckon that’s because when he talks distance, he always thinks of a bloody horse race !

    • Ben says:

      11:55am | 28/10/10

      Everything sold in AU should be in metric.  No choice.

    • ibast says:

      12:13pm | 28/10/10

      Well you’d have to shut down all the power stations, oil refineries and chemical plants in Australia.

      One good thing is all Harleys would be off the road soon enough.

    • Paul says:

      01:38pm | 28/10/10

      Well there goes our aviation industry.  Every aircraft measures it’s height in feet, speed in knots, flightpath in nautical miles, fuel load in gallons, cargo in pounds and engine thrust in horsepower.

      Better shut down all the ports and marians too considering that all shipping uses nautical miles for distance and knots for speed.

    • ChrisM says:

      12:25pm | 28/10/10

      the worst is the temperature.. When my brother (living in the US) told me the temperature, I’ve got no idea whether it’s cold, warm, hot, burning hot…

    • Joe says:

      12:34pm | 28/10/10

      I always thought the unit of measurement for ham was a ‘buck’....as an ” I’ll have two bucks of shaved leg ham please…”

    • PatC says:

      12:51pm | 28/10/10

      Started school in imperial and went through the changes in primary school. I can think, talk and work in both systems except one.

      I cannot get my head around fuel consuption… I have to convert it back to miles/gallon to understand if it’s good fuel economy or not!

    • Cam says:

      12:53pm | 28/10/10

      After competing the Melbourne Marathon recently, I received my finisher’s T-shirt.  A lovely fit, cool emblem of the race on the back.  Great, right??

      But on the front of the shirt…..in big font : “26.2”.

      Grrrrrr!!!!!

    • neil says:

      01:11pm | 28/10/10

      Here’s a bit of trivia for the nerds, A mile was originally a metric type measurement used by the Roman army to draw maps, as the soldiers marched they counted their paces (two steps)1000 paces was one mille. When you have 1000’s of men marching together their length of step becomes very consistent 740mm today a mile is still about the same length.

      Not only was the length of step consistent so was rate of step so the Romans would measure their day in miles as well, 10 mille between rests 40 mille per day, could you imagine modern army carrying a 50 kg kit, marching 65 km a day ?

    • Ivan says:

      01:19pm | 28/10/10

      Make it an offence to use imperial anywhere.

    • Richard Goodwin says:

      01:22pm | 28/10/10

      I think we went metric in 1975 not 1971.

    • Jim says:

      01:25pm | 28/10/10

      The conversions get me all the time….for years I thought 15cm was 9 inches. How wrong I was… :(

    • Leah says:

      01:26pm | 28/10/10

      Most people I know can understand height in metric. Like they know a guy at 195 cm is pretty damn tall. Or a girl at 155cm is short. I have no idea how tall I am in imperial. I think, when it comes to height, the time most people revert to imperial is with heights of 6 feet or more. Because 6 feet tall is universal for “really tall”. Especially for women.

      However I have found inches to be more useful than centimetres when talking about distances in day-to-day speech, probably because they are larger and there is more margin for error in estimating things raspberry Like to say something was 3 inches long allows for more give-and-take than to say it was 7cm long. 7cm sounds a lot more precise. And I was born in the late 80s raspberry However when I do actually measure something, and am being precise, it’s always metric.

      Go figure, I dunno.

    • Thom says:

      01:49pm | 28/10/10

      I grew up with metric but have come to appreciate the SAE system for things such as height, TV size etc

      Why is this an issue at all? Can’t the two systems not coexist in harmony?

    • Austin Morris says:

      03:25pm | 28/10/10

      I am fortunate to be bi-lingual when it comes to Metric and Imperial measures. A product perhaps of being a young man with a 55 year old British car. What I find amusing is the use of the Volkswagon Beetle as a measure of weight or size. I was watching a ducumentary on the USS Arizona where the narrator was describing the size of the projectile fired from the main guns as being ‘the size of a VW Beetle”. I could immediately relate to what he was talking about. I suggest adding a new measure to the vocabulary, being 1000ths of a VW.

    • GSO says:

      03:38pm | 28/10/10

      ....or when nightly weather report comes on and if it has been a warm day they will point out that was “102 in the old scale”. (isn’t 37c approx 100F? I was born after 71 so forgive my ignorance of such issues) Surely this isn’t required 39 years after we switched over. But i will admit, having done some home reno’s even me in my 30’s will still think in 1/8, 3/4 inch etc when it comes to screws etc rather than mm’s. the constant conversions keep your mind fresh.

    • Brissy says:

      04:00pm | 28/10/10

      I’m a mixed up girl (did metric at school).  All babies are in pounds. My weight is in kilo’s. I can do kilometres not miles but then there is my son who is in his early 20’s. He is a mechanic and stuff is in both imperial and metric.  He actually has 2 sets of stuff, one imperial (inches) and one metric (cm). Bizarre. Yet he is perfectly happy with both.  Get over it.

    • Ilikemetric says:

      07:47pm | 28/10/10

      Does your son work on 39+ year old cars every day? Interesting. If he doesn’t he could be annoyed about wasting all that money he could put on his mortgage.

      Hospitals, even American ones, work in metric. They generally calculate infant dosage millilitre by kilogram. So you’re wrong there. Babies are measured in metric.

      The apostrophe isn’t used for plurals but possessive.

    • papachango says:

      04:03pm | 28/10/10

      Give these imperialsts 2.54 centimetres and they’ll take 1.609344 kilometers!

    • Glen says:

      11:08pm | 28/10/10

      Papa… you win. Absolute gold.

    • papachango says:

      10:26am | 29/10/10

      Problem is, how do you get anything other than 365 days in a year?

    • Ash says:

      06:46pm | 28/10/10

      Conversion calculations aren’t a problem… must be just a girl thing…

    • Ashley says:

      07:57pm | 28/10/10

      Does it really matter? Surely there’s room enough in society to simply use both measurements.

      By the way, as I’m sure others have pointed out already, 175cm is a bit under 5’9 not 5’10. Personally although I know both, I mentally use imperial system for height. Just because it seems easier. I know what 5 feet is and 6 feet is… i know roughly how much an inch is… it’s just easier for me working out the inches in relation to 5 and 6 feet than the whole number in cm’s.

    • Tim says:

      08:36pm | 28/10/10

      3 inches is big isn’t it ?

    • Gregg says:

      12:19am | 29/10/10

      Not even for a weenie!

    • Liam says:

      11:06pm | 28/10/10

      As a student teacher I was recently working with a grade 3/4 class learning metric measurements. I thanked Logic that we were using a sensible, stable, predictable measuring system rather than a bunch of semi-arbitrary measures that were never the same from one context to another.
      A foot is 12 inches, a yard is 3 feet, a mile is 1,760 yards (and those figures aren’t even consistent!). And that’s not even getting into statute vs nautical miles, etc… When you talk about a centimetre, metre, or kilometre you know exactly what they work out to.
      Easy to teach, easy to learn, easy to use.

    • Gregg says:

      11:38pm | 29/10/10

      It’s kind of a little boring though in comparison wouldn’t you think?
      Think of how much you have those developing minds explore their outer realms of potential even if it means doing the hard yards!

    • Gregg says:

      12:26am | 29/10/10

      And then there was the crew out putting in a new power line and to get all the poles having cross bars at right height, they would stand the pole in a hole and then about half a dozen would stand on oneanothers’ shoulders until the top one could hold the tape at cross bar and someone on the ground held the end.
      Engineer comes along and say Oh yeah, why don’t you guys measure it on the ground?
      But Senor, we need to know the height and not the length.

      And with that two mile horse race a few days away, lets not forget the Horses Hands!

    • whatahooha says:

      01:44am | 29/10/10

      The baby weighed 7 pounds four, and he’s put on 300 grams in a week!

    • Faul Kinell says:

      06:30am | 03/11/10

      I remember awhile ago a female newsreader in the US remarked to the weatherman about the previous nights snowfall being less than he predicted by quipping ” you promised me 8 inches last night Bob”!

    • jeremie says:

      05:09am | 11/03/11

      There is kind of a perfection in the metric system and it makes perfect sense. A kilo equal a liter of water, and a liter of water is a 10cm by 10cm by 10cm cube of water (1000cm3). Those are the easiest way to calculate and convert, as long as you want to try a little bit.
      And to say that it is hard to adjust that old people can’t…. is a joke to me since we (in Europe) at to switch our money which is a much harder step and affect you everyday, and old people do good.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter