There were six of us and we were around 10 years old. We had come together for Alice’s birthday and pretty much left to our own devices. 

Kids today can watch this then Google porn. Picture: ABC

It was Alice’s idea to go to their attic. Attics were something the Secret Seven might explore - they did not exist in the houses I frequented. So Alice had already scored points with this plan. Little did I know the experiential gold that awaited.

Safely up the ladder, we clustered around her to see the reason for our ascent. There, in several old filing boxes, was at least a decade’s worth of Playboy, carefully stored away by Alice’s taciturn father.

We stayed in that attic until our eyes were sore. Sitting in a neat ring and politely passing each publication around the circle. Eventually the odds of detection became too high and, with my heart pumping like a hummingbird’s, we descended.

In this way my unofficial sex ed commenced. The official sex ed followed a few years later. I can’t recall the exact year of the official stuff, but part of the magic of school sex ed is that whenever teachers decide to slot it in, it always seems too late - usually hilariously so for most of the audience.

Whether a school foists the job of sex ed on a sweaty-palmed form teacher, or cops out and brings in an outside expert, these classes pretty much guarantee students some good times.

My all girls’ school opted for the outside expert. When she arrived she opened by placing a packet of the pill in front of us. The little yellow dots were ensconced in a piece of perspex the size of a brick, which we obediently circulated. I imagined the perspex was to deter theft, and any consequent spontaneous and ill-informed teen fornication.

The outside expert then moved directly to her central theme, which was “the minds of men”. Her key point, which she was at pains to drive home, was that boys would “say anything” to get what they wanted.

She advised us not to be surprised if a boy were to say, for example: “That his erection was causing him pain and he needed to have sex with us to stop the pain.” 

This piece of advice was actually met with a marked silence – raising the distinct possibility that some of the class had already succumbed to this very plea. In any event, we finished the lesson with a clear understanding that humanitarian grounds were not a valid reason for compromising our chastity.

My final memory of that class is of the teacher asking whether any of us knew the amount of semen in the average ejaculation. To this day, the pedagogical underpinning of her question eludes me. 

In any event, this new line of enquiry was instantly undermined by the interjection: “About a mouthful”.

A lot of water has passed under the bridge since then. Little did I suspect as I wisecracked my way through those classes that in the future I myself would be called on to give the same classes.

I was fresh out of a Dip Ed and had been allocated to Year 8 at an all boys’ school – a position made available by the fact that precious few of the experienced teachers would touch it with a stick. 

The first sex ed class was to be dedicated to, in a word, genitals. Consequently, each student had two detailed anatomical drawings on his desk. After a marathon minute at the board, I surveyed the be-pimpled mini men in front of me afresh, and was blessed with the revelation: I was the goddamn expert. 

I sat back on the edge of the desk, swung one leg nonchalantly over the other and began.

My only other memory from that class was the final question before the bell, which came from a boy called Justin.

Looking intently at the female diagram on his desk, he asked, “Miss, why is the clitoris so far away from the vagina?”. I have not changed Justin’s name since he doesn’t require protection.

Now, in another phase of my life, I’m sitting here wishing my seven-year-old daughter could similarly have stumbled on some Playboys in an attic toward the end of primary school. 

Instead, all it took was a rogue iPad, and a 9-year-old neighbour who knew what YouTube was and could spell.

I don’t know precisely what they saw, but judging from a few of the questions I’ve fielded since, I suspect it made Playboy look like a Penguin Classic. Needless to say the iPad has been desexed but the milk is spilt.

When should official sex ed start? If you thought you could wait for them to tie their shoelaces first you may need to think again.

Whatever systems and controls are in place, kids are getting exposed to all sorts of material much earlier than adults may wish. Access is everywhere. 

Do you know where your mobile is right now? My objective has changed from simply shielding them, to building some kind of scaffolding of fact, against which they can start to assess the crazy stuff they are going to find out there.

Most commented

47 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      04:50am | 11/10/11

      The kids of today are so fortunate to have the Internet. I wish I’d had it in my youth - I would have wasted much less time.

      It’s not so much the information the Net gives you, though that’s valuable - but the misinformation it takes away. Learning about the mechanics of sex is one thing, but the classes I had never covered how to get it, or the risks entailed. That was a matter of clumsy trial and error.

      Once you find good sources on the Net, such mysteries are made clear, and pitfalls such as marriage and children can be avoided.

    • iansand says:

      06:10am | 11/10/11

      Given Erick’s current level of misinformation one can only speculate with gobsmacked awe at that of which he has been disabused.

    • OchreBunyip says:

      07:50am | 11/10/11

      @iansand, Countering the inane drivel parcelled out concerning marriage and relationships is hardly misinformation. Consider the legend of an engagement ring, the lack of consequence of marriage vows, the flexible laws concerning what exactly is lack of consent and responsibility, the difference in reproductive rights between men and women and the pressure to waste money on unnecessary trappings for weddings just for a start. Both men and women would benefit by learning about these.

    • Pisspot says:

      08:06am | 11/10/11

      I didn’t need the internet to teach me about how to get a root and I certainly didnt need it to learn that children and getting married would be a complete mistake. I think its just just plain common sense. Especially marriage.

    • Eric Cartman says:

      08:35am | 11/10/11

      @ Pisspot

      But do you need the internet if you feel like watching a bored Californian housewife getting it on with 6 black men while her husband watches…?

    • neo says:

      10:18am | 11/10/11

      My parents had a chat to me at an early age, and I think it made me a bit shy during my teenage years. I really think things like this are better learned from your peers (preferably from female peers, with both theory and practice wink ).

      As for your daughter, I wouldn’t worry too much, YouTube screens their vids for graphic content. I’d be more worried about RedTube raspberry

    • BP says:

      12:38pm | 11/10/11

      @Neo. Glad you mentioned that redtube thing. My kids had a friend over last weekend and were watching the usual super mario vids on youtube when the friend arrived. My kids know what they are allowed to watch and what has their computer access removed for a month so are fairly trustworthy to leave alone for short periods while on the net.

      About twenty minutes after said child arrived one son comes out and says the others had watched two very naughty films on the net. By this time all kids are in backyard playing on trampoline and swingset so I ask son what had they watched. He says I don’t know, something called redtube. Never heard of the site before so go in log on and bring it up. I now know if the boys watched two of those videos they certainly received an education. Needless to say, redtube has been added to the netnanny list.

    • Thommo says:

      10:15am | 12/10/11

      Here’s the list of sites you need to add to Net Nanny:
      Redtube
      Cliphunter
      orsm
      pichunter
      youporn
      porntube
      xvideo
      sexstream

      that’s the main freebie vid sites

    • S.L says:

      05:18am | 11/10/11

      Type in anything on google and a reference to a porn site will come up somewhere. For people who want to see tits, bums and people having sex that’s fine but trying to shelter kids from all this is near impossible. My ex lets my 7 year daughter play on the internet unchecked for hours at a time (because I object) and thankfully I haven’t had to handle a “difficult” question at the most inappropriate time. But I’m prepared!

    • marley says:

      06:25am | 11/10/11

      That’s odd.  I’ve never encountered a porn site in my years of surfing. I must be doing something wrong.

    • acotrel says:

      07:08am | 11/10/11

      @marley
      It’s like praying to God - you have to use the right words !

    • Mouse says:

      07:25am | 11/10/11

      No Marley, I think a lot of the net has been cleaned up by the anti-viruses we have now. I think you have to be fairly specific or know the sites name.  I know pre-Norton days I got a phone call at work from hubby, he was in a dither. He was looking for a paint colour for a car and typed it in. The paint colour’s name was Chocolate Sauce, you would not believe the sites that came up and everytime he clicked the cross to delete, 10 more popped up! He was frantic. The kids were due home from school and he had all this female flesh all over the screen. I have never laughed so hard in all my life. After years of telling him to use correct shutdown procedure or he’ll loose my files, he did not believe me when I told him to simply turn the computer off. Thank god that it is not like that any more, well for kids anyway LOL :o)

    • bella starkey says:

      08:00am | 11/10/11

      Turn off the safe search, Marley.

    • neo says:

      10:23am | 11/10/11

      During research time for a Commerce assignment at school, I suggested to my friends that whitehouse.com is a great research site for info on the American government. Good times…

    • Aaron says:

      03:51pm | 11/10/11

      Really? I find that google is very effective at stopping ‘unwanted’ material. Even if you type in such things like “sex” or “vagina” it’ll come up with the Wikipedia article as the first result (Which I’ve been thankful for after not understanding something on a show like family guy and then googling it)

    • S.L says:

      04:27pm | 11/10/11

      @Aaron there are some clever cookies operating the smut sites. “Sex” or anything else like that is too obvious….........

    • Mahhrat says:

      05:57am | 11/10/11

      “She advised us not to be surprised if a boy were to say, for example: “That his erection was causing him pain and he needed to have sex with us to stop the pain.”

      My ex asked me that question when she was 23, so I’d say the sex ed classes failed her.

      As for internet access, if you haven’t had the discussion with your tweens yet about the dangers of that place, then you’re a muppet.

      My girl has no access to the ‘net without my presence.  That will remain until I’m confident she can handle what she’ll find out there in the world.  I’m thinking 14, but at 14 it’s probably be 16, so hey.

    • acotrel says:

      06:09am | 11/10/11

      ‘The outside expert then moved directly to her central theme, which was “the minds of men”. Her key point, which she was at pains to drive home, was that boys would “say anything” to get what they wanted. ‘

      People like Erick, encourage that stuff, then complain about how badly men are treated in marriages !

    • Kelly G says:

      07:22am | 11/10/11

      Julia Gillard, Craig Thompson, Belinda Neal etc with leaders with such outstanding values do we really have to worry about what the internet has to offer in terms of the corruption of youth department?

    • ibast says:

      07:22am | 11/10/11

      “When she arrived she opened by placing a packet of the pill in front of us.”

      The Pill.  The second best thing a woman can put in her mouth to prevent pregnancy.

      On a more serious note, you are right Amy.  Kid are both computer literate and sexually curious in primary school.  We shouldn’t wait until high school to educate kids on this subject.

    • Wayne Kerr says:

      09:02am | 11/10/11

      Agree, When my kids were young (primary school)if they asked a question they always got an answer, often to their regret as I made sure they got all the information.  My logic was that if they were prepared to ask the question then they deserved to get all the imformation presented in a matter of fact way, without embarrassmnet, well at least on my part.

      As for the internet. The old advice still stands true.  Keep the kids computer access to a computer in a central location in the home where an adult can see what they’re up to so they don’t go to the wrong sites inadvertantly or otherwise. Or worse still get get hassled/bullied on social media.

    • Tubesteak says:

      07:43am | 11/10/11

      firstly, leaving kids alone with a computer is like leaving them alone in a car with the engine running on a hill with no hand-brake on. It’s negligent.

      As for when is sex-ed the best time. When they start asking is the best time. It’s better they find out the truth than all the conservative dogma of your teacher or sterile drawings you were required to give.

    • majority says:

      08:11am | 11/10/11

      Got kids? Everything has an internet connection now. Who can be internet cop 24/7? Kids quickly learn how to disable filters. Teaching them values is more important.

    • Tubesteak says:

      10:29am | 11/10/11

      Everything?

      The only thing in my house that has an internet connection is the computer. That whole thing is password protected. No password = no logon. Supervise them whilst they use it and it’s only to be used for research purposes.

      Don’t give them mobile phones with internet connections, either. The little darlings can persist with a Nokia 5110.

    • Mark says:

      07:49am | 11/10/11

      So , why is the clitoris so far away from the vagina? I don’t get it.

    • Mahhrat says:

      08:28am | 11/10/11

      Penn & Teller (I’ve been watching them lately) had something interesting to say about their “proof” that God doesn’t exist.

      Their argument is simple:  It takes a man 2 minutes to achieve orgasm, a woman about 20.  No God designed our bodies.

    • VVS says:

      08:32am | 11/10/11

      And you never will…

    • Nick says:

      08:38am | 11/10/11

      It is a good question. Probably to do with our angle of approach 1000s of years ago when we were apes. Think about it. Monkeys go from behind and level.

      But who knows - do women even know?

    • wilma says:

      08:49am | 11/10/11

      if you can find it, we know you love us

    • Peter says:

      09:06am | 11/10/11

      I suppose because it doesn’t really matter that much from an evolutionary perspective that the female actually orgasms during sex to get pregnant.  But I’m just guessing.

    • Wayne Kerr says:

      09:20am | 11/10/11

      Mahrat, further proof that God doesn’t exist.  Why is a woman’s vagina so close to her anus? What God would place the play ground so close to the sewer.

    • Budz says:

      09:33am | 11/10/11

      @Peter: True point.
      I’d be intrigued to know for how long the clitoris has been present for. I’d say that would have been an evolutionary thing too as women with it would have procreated a lot more.

    • Peter says:

      10:03am | 11/10/11

      @Budz - apparently this is a hotly contested subject and the answer is not settled.  Personally, I like this explanation:

      “Symons says that the most parsimonious interpretation of the evidence is that the female orgasm is a by-product, like male nipples, that exists merely because the same trait in the opposite sex confers a selective advantage. In other words, male orgasm by way of the penis is a smashing success, and since the clitoris is made from the same fetal tissue as the penis, it canÕt help but precipitate orgasms too. ThatÕs not to say that female arousal is superfluous, or that it doesnÕt have a function. Symons believes arousal is an adaptive mechanism in female sexuality, and that female genitals have indeed been ÒdesignedÓ to provide pleasurable stimulation during intercourse. But the particular experience of orgasm, he says, is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for reproductive fitness in females. ÒItÕs simply a by-product of the ability of males to have orgasms.Ó”

      http://discovermagazine.com/1992/jun/evolutionofthebi59

    • Ben C says:

      10:12am | 11/10/11

      @ Wayne Kerr

      God may have expected some people to go playing in the sewer as well as the playground, so he might have put them so close together for easy access.

    • Liz says:

      08:24am | 11/10/11

      I don’t think all the comments on this story are relevant to the story. Unfortunately these parents have to know where their children are, who they are mixing with and take control of the trash available to them on the internet, tv and any other sources. Self regulation of these and advertising in this country have failed our children.

    • Lauren says:

      09:23am | 11/10/11

      My 25 year old friend started her first year of teaching this year in health. In her year 7 class the students asked her “Miss, do you know what a blue waffle is?” and erupted into giggles. She didn’t know. I didn’t know either until she looked it up and told me.

      When a bunch of year 7s know something about sex ed that two 24/25 year olds didn’t know it is time to panic.

    • NicoleG says:

      10:57am | 11/10/11

      I have 15 years on you and I had no idea either, so I just googled it. Graphics and all. Now I think I’m going to throw up   sick

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      01:38pm | 11/10/11

      hahaha blue waffle!

      Not as such, internet is everywhere these days, doesnt take long to get around.

      Even though its disgusting, it happens, part of life.

    • richard.perin@gmail.com says:

      09:36am | 11/10/11

      Amy, as a single parent of two girls (some of my work here on thepunch is all about them) who are now discovering the feelings that go with the pictures, I can only say that it isnt easy. in fact its near heartbreaking. Whatever form of popular culture you may choose the message is the same. Until you resolve some of the bigger polemic issues, you will not resolve this.

      Humans and human interaction have become marketable or exchangeable items.

      The paradigm of the marketplace is one where commodities, including humans treated as commodities, are brought into relation with each other (associated and exchanged) as quantitative differences measurable by money.

      Democracy, reinforced by the fourth estate, also contains the premise of an indifference to qualitative differences between atomised individuals whose quantifiable aggregation forms the basis of political decision and concepts of democracy (one person - one vote).

      Young children are curious, and want to learn about sex. there is nothing wrong with that. But when they start to adopt the dress, or the attitude of being sexually active, they are simply trading their percieved worth, and the value they are being taught that matters.

      The increasing popularity of online dating and social networking is self-evident. We live in a global consumer-oriented world. We appear to be comfortable with the idea of effectively shopping online for love or for friends. Instead of offering radically new options for valuing our young people, these devices mostly reinforce traditional forms of intimacy, where “boy still meets girl” according to explicit and implicit social criteria - and where ‘exchange’ of personal information or an image is fundamental.

      One strategy I employ is the educate, educate, educate technique. I know I can’t stop my children from making their own choices, I can only hope to get them to make the right ones. In this respect google images is great for showing images of STD’s, and there are some excellent birthing video’s…...

      Namaste Xo@

    • valerie woodruffe mullaloo says:

      12:33pm | 11/10/11

      Going to be launching my xtube webpage on Dec 12th that certainly will make Playboy look like a Penguin Classic LOL.  BTW Lady Chatterley’s Lover is a Penguin Classic… Tame by comparison

    • Ricky says:

      12:34pm | 11/10/11

      See this is what makes the internet so very scary for people these days, it’s old people with out-dated views on life. People who were brought up in a different age need to learn to adapt to the changing tides and accustom themselves with reality whether they like it or not. Yes the internet can be used for porn and inappropriate acts but I am a computer technician who uses google every day and never find any porn related websites. You people just jump the gun and blame the object rather than look at yourself being a useless user who knows nothing about what they’re, but choose not to admit that so blame the object. As the saying goes “The object is only as good as the user”. The internet is fantastic, a truly genius creation for the entire world to use. Get with the times you whining people who still think we should ride bikes on a saturday because I did back in the day. Well guess what? I DON’T CARE ABOUT YOUR DAY, I CARE ABOUT THE PRESENT.

      Adults all think they’re so wise and mature because they are older than us Lazy generation but yet you can’t seem to fathom that the tides have changed and you can not seem to adapt to the new way of life because it goes against your beliefs in life.

    • I hate pies says:

      04:41pm | 11/10/11

      Yes Ricky, you really do sound very immature. I suggest you write what you just typed down, put it some place safe, and read it in 5 years. You’ll be amazed to see how much you’ve grown up, and it will dawn on you that you didn’t know everything…then you’ll be scared by the realisation of how little you actually know.

    • St. Michael says:

      06:16pm | 11/10/11

      “Lazy generation but yet you can’t seem to fathom that the tides have changed”

      And the laughs just keep on coming!

      Darling, when you get to a mature age you’ll see the times really have not changed.  It’s the same old turd just rolled in fresh glitter for a new generation.

    • David says:

      01:41pm | 11/10/11

      I really don’t think that curious kids finding a bit of porn does them any where near as much harm as we make out it does. Just need to educate them early so they learn to put that kind of thing into context - ie porn often doesn’t depict real world sexual relations. Much of it is designed to appeal to our fantasies.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      02:13pm | 11/10/11

      Correct, just do gooders thinking the world is perfect, like they never looked at a magazine or switch the channel when boobs come on, if thats the worst problem you have with your kid you have it pretty easy!

    • Utopia Boy says:

      02:43pm | 11/10/11

      IMHO (and many freako religious hypocrite hippy right wing armchair activists will disagree), an excess of sex porn is nowhere near as dangerous as excessive violence porn (as in guns / drugs etc).
      Spare me the arguments about porn BEING violence. Porn is fantasy. Maybe not your fantasy, but someone’s fantasy. The genitals are sex organs. Sex organs are for having sex. Everybody should have sex. With whomever they choose.
      No one should play with guns.

    • Hunter says:

      10:01am | 14/10/11

      This article is a bit of alugh - mainly becuase I don’t see how anyone could get any kind of sex education from Playboy. If you know your mags you’ll know that Playboy is by far the tamest of them all - there’s never couples pictorials and the woman are often a little modest - it’s basically a forum for getting glamour shots of semi-celebs - sex education value is basically zero. Except for a guy it might show you that the clitoris is an inch or so above the vaginal opening - apart from that it’s as lame as a party hosted by Julia Gillard and Bob Brown.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @CrawfordFund: @farrm51 u may like 2 help spread word of our #foodsecurity journo award http://t.co/FwbMWwJmLf

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

tory_maguire

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

Daniel Piotrowski

Australia. Where you die for your country and get a rest area named after you http://t.co/hO6LpfwDvI

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter