The antics of the Minister for Women, Tanya Plibersek, this week are the latest in a long line of Labor tactics that continue to diminish and devalue the vital parliamentary arena of question time.

During their 2001 political wilderness, Nicola Roxon, Cheryl Kernot, Jilia Gillard, Annette Ellis and Jenni Macklin at a book launch on women in the ALP.

The point she made so loudly and proudly about the Opposition not allocating many questions to Coalition women is hollow and disingenuous.

Governments use Question Time to crow about themselves, using backbenchers, often in marginal seats, to ask pre-arranged questions.  Political reality necessitates that the leadership team in Opposition use question time to hold the government to account.

In the less politically-charged arena of the Senate, the Coalition’s number one questioner is a woman - Senator Helen Coonan – and the proportion of questions asked by women mirrors our proportion of women Senators.

But the feigned indignation of the Labor sisterhood has little regard for reality or the facts. It’s all about the spin.

Never mind that Liberal women have achieved many “firsts” in politics. Never mind the fact that a record number of women were elected to Parliament in the first Howard Government, never mind the fact that the percentage of working women grew markedly under the steady economic management of the Coalition, never mind the fact that the Coalition more than doubled the number of childcare places and introduced the Childcare Tax Rebate to help parents with out of pocket costs. 

Never mind the fact that the Coalition strengthened the Sex Discrimination Act to enshrine the rights of pregnant and breast-feeding women.

Labor’s sisterhood will always loudly decry the Howard years as some sort of dark age – no doubt following their leader in a crude attempt to re-write history.

What has always struck me is how the “sisterhood” is remarkably silent on certain issues.  Where was the outcry from Labor women when Mark Latham called a female journalist a skanky ho? Not a peep.  In fact, Latham went on to become Labor leader, largely helped by his chief numbers wrangler, Julia Gillard.

Where were the choruses of indignant Labor women when Muslim leader Sheik al-Hilaly basically said that women who dressed in a certain way were to blame if they were raped?  For fear of offending religious sensitivities, Labor women were effectively “gagged” – whether self-imposed or not. 

On a personal note, last year when Labor MP Belinda Neal made her bizarre comment to me that my baby would be born a demon, not one Labor woman came to my defence.  Can you imagine the hue and cry if it had been a Liberal MP saying the same thing to a heavily-pregnant Labor woman?  They would have been frog-marched out of Parliament.

Instead, Labor trawled the press gallery in a desperate attempt to confect some moral equivalence, arguing that my ridicule of Labor using taxpayer dollars to fund domestic help was really an attack on the family status of Julia Gillard.

Talk about spin.I remember well Labor’s candidate in Indi in 2004 who said that I couldn’t possibly represent the people of Indi because I wasn’t married and didn’t have kids (at that time).  Not only did he keep his endorsement (again, not a peep from the Labor sisterhood), but Julia Gillard travelled all the way the north-east Victoria to campaign for him and proudly pose for newspaper happy snaps.

But why should I, or any other Liberal woman, expect the sisterhood to come to our defence when we are slighted? 

Look at the treatment that Labor doled out to their own former federal MP Kelly Hoare in the grubby preselection that ensured high-flyer Greg Combet his seat in Parliament.  Her treatment demonstrated that even quotas can’t protect a Labor woman when they find themselves in the firing line of the blokey Labor Inc machine. 

The beat-up by Tanya Plibersek in Federal Parliament this week is a convenient smokescreen to boost Labor’s women “cred” while their policies are actively working against the interests of Australian women.

One fact the sisterhood always ignores is that a worsening Australian economy will always have a bigger impact on women.  A recent report by the Australia Institute underscored the effects of the recession on women.

Labor’s high-spending approach to economic management is the major way they continue to fail Australian women – add to that rising childcare costs, rising health costs, failure to deliver extra funding to address violence against women, cuts to family payments and pushing paid parental leave out until after the next election…and you start to get a real picture of the priority Labor places on advancing the cause of Australian women.

If it’s not symbolic, it doesn’t rate with the sisterhood. 

It would almost be funny if it weren’t so terribly hypocritical and shallow.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Most commented

27 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • iansand says:

      07:14am | 18/09/09

      Thank you for one of your usual balanced, non-partisan and rational contributions.

    • Martin says:

      07:57am | 18/09/09

      The Liberals have always been more about results than spin. A well written article.

    • Liz says:

      08:03am | 18/09/09

      Just goes to show you need principles for politics and not personal issues alone.You need to be tough,resilient and thick-skinned to make a legislator.

    • David says:

      08:15am | 18/09/09

      I say let the women go for broke in politics . They are already encroaching en mass in all fields and are redefining the traditional roles held by the male species .
      An all female parliament , defense forces , police force etc etc would be great for Australia .
      Let them be the brunt for all the foibles that the males incur .
      Maybe their morals would be impeccable .
      Lets see how bitchy and tough they can be .
      I am sure their inherent weaknesses will be revealed eventually and let them put their money where their mouth is .

    • Chris Grealy says:

      08:30am | 18/09/09

      Typical Liberal whingeing

    • TerryT says:

      08:37am | 18/09/09

      Re Chris
      Typical Labor denial

    • Daniel says:

      08:50am | 18/09/09

      Sofie your party is just as bad if not worse with Tuckey doing his old tricks don’t throw stones when you live in glass houses I say.

    • Julia says:

      09:19am | 18/09/09

      Good work, Sophie.

      Post WWII, it was the Chifley government which insisted women give their jobs up for returning soldiers and Menzies who appointed Edith Lions to Cabinet.

      Just like they forget it was the union movement which demanded the White Australia policy around 1900, and Menzies who started to wind it back.

      On the bright side, at some point Labor will believe their spin but the people won’t. Just look at Anna Bligh who has now become the rhyming slang replacement of porky pies.

    • Emily Brown says:

      09:36am | 18/09/09

      Did I miss something? The libs did absolutely nothing on paid parental leave. 12 years inaction. Labor got on with the job.

    • watty says:

      09:51am | 18/09/09

      Far too kind to the Rudd “Noddy Dolls” strategically placed behind Rudd when he is delivering a 20 minute “reply” to a Question.

      Australia’s very own Stepford Wives ?

    • Al says:

      10:00am | 18/09/09

      @Daniel - It might help if you read the article, ‘people who live in glass houses’ is exactly her point - i.e. Plibersek - shouldn’t throw stones.

    • watty says:

      10:25am | 18/09/09

      Oh you poor luvvie Emily.

      Imagine having to live without paid parental and maternity leave?

      And just why should other taxpayers pay for these allowances?

      Oh I see! Because Australia is a Nanny State which looks after you from cradle to grave compliments of the taxpayer.

    • Margaret Gray says:

      10:43am | 18/09/09

      The Labor sisterhood has NO credibility when, whilst dogmatically advocating equal opportunity, it aggressively defends the gender-exclusionist independence of archaic women-only institutions such as Emily’s List and the Lyceum Club.

    • Sarah says:

      11:12am | 18/09/09

      Dead right Sophie - great article.  So sick of the fake moralising we always hear from the Labor Party about how well they represent women.  Real women are represented by the Nats and the Libs - and always have been!

    • Keith says:

      12:14pm | 18/09/09

      If any sentence in a political television broadcast has more than twenty words, when it gets to the end most people have forgotten how it began. Including the person speaking it.  A well written and balanced piece,  a rare offering from a mature brain, and I’m a Labor swinger, voter that is. Just shows, there’s no sisterhood in politics, only the party line.

    • Fred Johnson says:

      12:15pm | 18/09/09

      I reckon you did miss something Emily. This piece has nothing to do with paid parental leave! As for the differences between women in both parties…Labour has women in Parliament because they have to (i.e. Emily’s List, Affirmative Action) . Libs have women in Parliament because they CHOOSE to!

    • Peter says:

      12:31pm | 18/09/09

      Sophie Mirabella hasn’t put forward a single interesting idea since she has been in Parliament. Her only contributions are anti Labor diatribes like this article. No wonder she has never been considered for a Ministry. Maybe she is good at making the tea and scones at Liberal Party functions.

    • Mark says:

      12:38pm | 18/09/09

      Dear Emily Brown, you need to not rely on the government…ooops sorry scrub that….the taxpayer to fund a child that you have by choice.

      Millions of children have been raised by families in this country without the help of paid maternity leave, why should it be different now.

      What you, and many of your fellow bluggers see are the dollars, not the long term debt that the Labor government wants to drive this country into. As much as you might want to be critical of Johnny, the Libs ran the country well, were elected out of office leaving this great country with a very healthy surplase, and tried to minimise the need for people to rely on government welfare. In otherwords to take charge of our own lives.

      All the Labor government has done is gone on a spending spree, and promised more handouts to people, therefore forcing people to rely on the government.

    • David says:

      01:48pm | 18/09/09

      Mark, I do believe the Howard government created the ‘middle class welfare’ you so conveniently ignore. Hence the cries of derision when Labor started means testing all the free money going to nuclear families - courtesy of single people and childless couples everywhere. While the Howard and Costello partnership were a far better couple than the rot currently in power, they contributed to the problems facing Rudd and co.

    • Dr Evil says:

      02:38pm | 18/09/09

      “It would almost be funny if it weren’t so terribly hypocritical and shallow.” ...

      You mean like Parliament?

    • Mark says:

      03:09pm | 18/09/09

      David,

      The Howard government may have introduced the ‘middle class welfare’, but rest assured as a middle class family we have not benefited from it one little bit. The libs may have introduced it, yet still managed a surplus of 50+ billion dollars, lowest Australian debt etc etc etc.

      Yet Kev has already spent all that and more. So when they were voted out, the libs contributed to the current problem?

      No the problem is that Kev bought popularity. He promised things he could not deliver. It was like a kid with a credit card. Reminds me of that quote “The checks in the mail”.

    • Michael says:

      04:33pm | 18/09/09

      But, Sophie, until Tanya Plibersek made her comment, I cannot recall seeing a female Coalition MP asking a question. She observed it looked like a boy’s club on your side of the House, it did, till she stirred the Coalition pot. Except for the background-locked sharp fingernails and termagant glare of Julie Bishop, a female face ne’er shifted Malcolm and his mates from centre stage. If Tanya got the Coalition women up and shoved the blokes aside, more power to her. Even if it was only a passing strategy for the cameras and the evening news.

    • Fin says:

      10:04pm | 18/09/09

      Why are there so many comments saying this piece was well written?
      It was just a hypocritical and hubristic rambling that had hardly any structure to it. Dull ideas, dully expressed by a dull MP. Last of her articles I read.

    • Dan says:

      10:33pm | 18/09/09

      Considering that you wanted the burkah banned, thus taking away freedom of choice from women, you are the last person to lecture anyone on women’s rights. Why don’t you have a look at your own party?

    • Ken says:

      12:31am | 19/09/09

      I knew Sophie (née Panopoulos) when she was in student politics at Melb Uni. She was a nasty piece of work who had few political friends and received not even an ounce of respect from her opponents on all sides of politics. Seems like little has changed.

    • dude says:

      11:35am | 19/09/09

      Peter, ‘Tea and scones for Liberal party functions’ you give her way too much ability. From what we see and hear of her this would surely be too much.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      12:59pm | 19/09/09

      Its Dame Edith LYONS, not lion!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Bogans_Heroes @1fatbogan Ha! So Adelaide, so creepy. Gilles St, then Unley, then Pembroke.

Paul Colgan

@joekiely just beat the crus. No sweat eh?

Paul Colgan

@bolgo101 Stick ROG in front of the posts and you still have white knuckles

Paul Colgan

@joekiely how far out was he?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter