One day in the near future the world as we know it will come to an end.

June 2010: Egged on by a faceless creature, the deputy leader sharpens its claws…

Australia will have become a series of atolls populated only by Gold Coast property developers and surrounded by smug hippies snorkelling past saying “I told you so”.

I speak of course about climate change, which is now certain to drown us in saltwater and self-pity and consign our grandchildren to interbreeding with dugongs in a bold but unbecoming attempt to keep the species alive.

Like all catastrophes lately this has been caused by the Federal “Government”, an administration which has produced so many cataclysmic disasters it is listed in the Yellow Pages under “Special Effects”.

But they have not been alone in creating this apocalypse. The Greens too have been helpfully cutting the brake cables and greasing the wheels as the runaway freight train for Federal Labor hurtles towards oblivion.

And of course the Liberals are also responsible for killing the environment but you can’t really blame them, any more than you could leave Philip Nitschke alone in a room with two bottles of sleeping pills and a nagging pensioner and wonder why only one of them was left when you got back.

The fact of the matter is this: If it were not for the Greens and Julia Gillard we would have an emissions trading scheme not in 2015, nor Barnaby Joyce’s preferred start time of Stardate 30457, but - and I urge all Greenies to sit down while reading this - the week after next.

That was the kick-off for the initial carbon pollution reduction scheme that Kevin Rudd wanted to see enacted and was given a mandate for. But it was killed off by the Greens in the Senate and then Julia Gillard and the rest of the people now running the country put a few more bullets in the corpse just to make sure that it was dead.

Then, in the most breathtaking act of all, she and the ALP razor gang knifed Rudd after his decision to take their advice and dump the ETS caused his popularity to plummet.

Now, a year after that sorry and shameful chapter of Australian political history, Gillard and her bloody-handed accomplices have been going around backgrounding the media on how the real reason had nothing to do with their sabotage of Rudd but was because he didn’t have a vision for the future.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but he did until you shafted it Julia - and then you shafted him for it.

This week is not just the anniversary of that miserable day. It is a reminder of what might have been possible had the country not been hijacked by the two equally dangerous forces of extreme leftist idealism and reactionary rightist populism.

It says a lot about the naivety of the first and the soullessness of the second that these two forces are now ruling the country in coalition with each other. It is the sort of sickening and ungodly alliance that should not be seen anywhere outside the Island of Dr Moreau.

And that is what is truly galling about the pathetic public bitchslapping that’s gone on over the past few days: The clumsy attempt at historical revisionism that only confirms those trying to spin it still think that they are too smart by half and we are all mugs with no memory.

They thought they could pull a swifty on us by swapping prime ministers in some grotesque human version of the old pea-and-thimble trick and now that it’s blown up in their faces they’re trying the same political sleight of hand to get out of it. It’s a tactic as stupid as it is cynical. Indeed Albert Einstein himself defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.*

But let’s leave lessons in political spin aside for one moment and think about the real consequence of the bloody-minded idiocy of the Greens and the self-interested bloodlust of the ALP.

Again I want any granola-crunchers reading this to sit down and pay careful attention to the following points:

1. In two years’ time Tony Abbott will be elected Prime Minister of Australia with a thumping majority and the Liberals will stay in power for at least two terms and possibly three;

2. Any carbon price that has been implemented will immediately be dismantled and the nation will settle in for another decade of Coalition rule; and

3. The debate about what to do about climate change will continue to devolve into the Dark Ages-style debate about whether it’s real or not.

This is the inevitable consequence of the events of 2010. It was a gun cocked by the Greens when they blocked genuine progress on tackling climate chance and fired by trigger-happy cowboys in the ALP.

And here is one more watertight prediction: In years to come the events overnight on June 23, 2010 will outrank the Dismissal as the most treacherous and damaging act of political barbarism in Australia since World War II.+

It will be seen as the catalyst for the destruction of the Labor Party and the trashing of Australia’s reputation as a mature, stable and progressive nation.

On the plus side, however, it will be a great chance to work on your tan.

*See also Morris Iemma, Nathan Rees, Kristina Keneally.

+By an entirely unrelated coincidence the date June 23 as an usherer of untold misery and destruction into the world also happens to be the author’s birthday.

251 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      06:06am | 23/06/11

      So, good news all around, eh?

      I can’t wait to see the misandrist, racist Labor Party and Greens relegated to the dustbin of history.

    • L. says:

      07:26am | 23/06/11

      “I can’t wait to see the misandrist, racist Labor Party and Greens relegated to the dustbin of history.”

      Labor will be here forever, while I suspect that the Greens will linger, albeit in a watered down fashion…

    • Unoinist says:

      07:43am | 23/06/11

      Snorted from the wrong baggy this morning Erick? on the tax payer too I’d bet

    • rb says:

      08:42am | 23/06/11

      @ Erick
      Funny, we’re all hoping the same for you.

    • dovif says:

      09:17am | 23/06/11

      L

      Well we know that Bob Brown thinks the success of the Greens are tied to winning votes off the ALP, we also know the ALP don’t think that is a problem, and don’t care about that. At recent polls, the Greens had been as high as 14%, and the ALP as low as 28%.

      It actually only take 7 more % of people to leave the ALP and goes to the Greens for the Greens to become the main left party in Australian politics and for the ALP to become a balance of power party

      The ALP don’t really care about that

    • fml says:

      09:18am | 23/06/11

      Where are all the liberals complaining that there isnt any labor bashing articles on the punch?

    • TheRaptured says:

      10:40am | 23/06/11

      The Carbon tax is nothing more than a tax grab by the Bilderberg group and nothing else, the greatest fraud in history, when will people wake up to this?  I just can’t understand why people are so willingly stupid about this fraud. This is the first time in history that the Sheeple have put pressure on government to tax them severely for our air, which the government did not supply in the first place. The flouridated water supply is obviously working well on the populous, the stuff shrinks the brain and make people slower, look at Gen-Y for example, they have never known real freedom. I can thank Aldous Huxley, one of New World Order parasites for identifying a way to make people, Sheeple through the water supply.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      10:50am | 23/06/11

      Erick quoting *Tolstoy*?

    • Leopard says:

      10:57am | 23/06/11

      @TheRaptured is right.  So many dupes.

    • Miss Andry says:

      11:54am | 23/06/11

      Take that back Eric(k), instantly. I won’t have my name sullied by any significant ‘Strain political party, and that includes the Greens, Liberal, National, ANZ, Westpac, Independent, Sex, Katters ‘Strain, (yes, significant) parties. Scratch the Sex party. When shortly, the world does come to an end, I’ll be here to comfort, well, anyone. You’all give me a bell now, you hear?

    • hot tub political machine says:

      12:07pm | 23/06/11

      Whoops,

      Trotsky I mean, damm Russians and their chess and cool names….

    • Jem says:

      03:02pm | 23/06/11

      Erick, do you also consider the Howard Government to be misandrist?

      The implementation of the family tax benefit is biased against fathers, or was when I filled the forms in 5 years ago.  The father of the child is 4th in line to recieve the benefit, the mother/adoptive mother and female guardians are all priority over the father.  My husband has been the primary carer for our daughter since she was 6 months old, he pays for the child care since he went back to work part time.  I get paid the child care rebate though.  The default assumption is the payment will go to the mother.  The bias is embedded in the system that the Howard Government set up.

      So I hope you reserve the same level of damnation for the Coalition.  They place no value on fathers either.

    • Erick says:

      03:18pm | 23/06/11

      Jem, I acknowledge that the Coalition are also misandrist. However, they are not as misandrist than Labor.

      It’s a matter of the lesser of two evils.

    • Jem says:

      04:24pm | 23/06/11

      Erick, fair enough, although I don’t wish for either evil.

    • No 1 Rosie says:

      04:30pm | 23/06/11

      Erick

      Yes, can’t wait to see this Minority Govt out of the way. I watched Question Time yesterday and it was sad and disappointing to see how our Parliament has lost all its worth because our PM, supposedly our role model has lost all respect and trust of the people.

      I wondered why Julia Bishop asked Rudd; “when was he going to return to Bougainville more like Boganville?” I later found out what she meant - Rudd returning to the Lodge where today’s occupants were known to the former PM as Bogans! Just great I thought, this is where the back stabbing Gillard has taken the nation to since she became our first female PM. The vitriol in today’s Question Time wouldn’t be so horrible if Julia Gillard hadn’t become PM without all the controversy. This has added to her incompetency, lies etc

      I said in the beginning because of the controversial way she became PM, Gillard would bring along with her bad karma and therefore not succeed in anything that she tries to do for the nation. Until someone finishes her off as our PM, the bad karma stands.

      Ironically the eve before her assassination of Rudd, the large Australian Flag above Parliament House, flying to represent the nation and its people was flying with a torn strip. This is not only a bad look but told me that what was happening inside Parliament House was not in line with what the majority of Australians really wanted. It was a sign pointed out to the Speaker by a Liberal MP.

      Happy Birthday to Joe and myself, the polls tells me I have something to celebrate.

    • Mikeymike says:

      04:54pm | 23/06/11

      @ TheRaptured:

      Quick tip: if you want people to come around to your way of thinking, don’t call them sheeple or call them willingly stupid.

      I assume you have evidence of your claims?

      To everyone else: yes I know, don’t feed the trolls.  It’s my problem, I’m dealing with it.

    • Drunk Guy says:

      06:31pm | 23/06/11

      I pretty much agree with Erick, there’s no doubt the popularity the Greens had at this election will be already worn off with the foray into Brown’s personal wishlist re gay marriage and by their compound interest style of tax tax tax as a policy for everything, with the cover of a green name and a green poster and claiming to be an environmental party now uncovered as a misnoma , they will be obliterated at the next election along with so many labor bullies who need to get out of the party and let some real people with genuine interests for this country step up.

    • Bev says:

      07:17pm | 23/06/11

      Erick says:03:18pm | 23/06/11

      Jem, I acknowledge that the Coalition are also misandrist. However, they are not as misandrist than Labor.

      So long as you take “we will pursue you to the grave” Joe Hockey out of the mix”.

    • Richard says:

      07:43pm | 23/06/11

      @Mikeymike~ TheRaptured is not a troll. He is speaking plain facts, and honestly all it takes is a bit of deduction, a bit of 2 and 2 makes 4, to see what he is saying makes sense.

      As for ‘evidence’ (have you been hanging out with persephone for too long Mikey?), I’ve posted this link on the punch more than half a dozen times, and not once have a received a comment back, a confirmation of its explosive contents and their implications:

      “Even George Soros, the billionaire hedge fund operator, says money managers would find ways to manipulate cap-and-trade markets. “The system can be gamed,” Soros, 79, remarked at a London School of Economics seminar in July. “That’s why financial types like me like it—because there are financial opportunities.”
      http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aXRBOxU5KT5M

      Hear that? They even admit it, the system will be gamed and manipulated by the kleptarchic bankster cartels. Its a scam, its a fraud, and YOU are the dupe Mikeymike.

    • LC says:

      01:08pm | 24/06/11

      Labor ain’t anywhere, unfortunately.

      Neither will the Greens, but they’ll never again have the influence they’ve commanded this term.

    • Stone age liberal says:

      02:32pm | 24/06/11

      @TheRaptured,not sure if you truly understand the concept of user pays, we are not being taxed for the air, we are being taxed for using the air as a dumping ground. Please do a search on “tragedy of the commons” you may find it useful, but to condense down for you, the air is a common resource, no-one “owns” it, therefore people (e.g. factories) feel that they can utilise it at no cost to anyone. This is a fallacy as by utilising this resource (e.g. pollution such as carbon) they are changing the nature of it and making it less valuable to the rest of us. Therefore should they not have to pay for the use of this resource? I am all for the market setting the price of this and possibly the price should be related to returning the air to the way it was before they used it. To put in simpler terms, if you (subsitute everyone in the world) rented your house (substitute the air) out and the renters (subsitute polluters) trashed it would you not expect them to pay for the damage? Just because the air is a “common” resource does not mean it can be used indiscriminately.

    • Edward James says:

      06:17am | 23/06/11

      Well happy birthday Joe! We all of us who are still alive grow older.Edward James

    • TChong says:

      06:38am | 23/06/11

      June 23 2010 will be considered as politically dark as november ‘75 ?
      Wow talk about a rusted on Rudd- ite. !

    • stevem says:

      10:31am | 23/06/11

      November ‘75 was the sacking of a corrupt government - remember the Khemlani loans affair? June ‘10 was the day a legitimate government was hijacked in a factional war. The perception that back room puppet masters run the country rather than our elected representatives became entrenched in the public psyche.
      Yes, I’d say it was a pretty dark day.

    • Against the Man says:

      06:52am | 23/06/11

      Was the carbon tax introduced because Gilltard believes in climate change or because Bob Brown instructed her to do so? If she believed in it why lie about no carbon tax as an election promise? Was she just lying to get voted in? If she believes in it why is she rolling out the policy in such a clumsy and chaotic way? I mean she would have a strict and competent policy in place that she would have been working on for the last year or more, right?

      The fact is Juliar Gilltard is no better than a snake. Unless we get honest answers Gilltard will continue to sink in the polls and Australia will continue to pay the price of Gilltard’s poor upbringing smile

    • TimB says:

      08:53am | 23/06/11

      Exactly AtM. She either deliberately lied to win the election, or she’s kowtowing to the Greens to stay in power.

      It’s one or the other. Have fun trying to get the Labor rusties here to tell you which one it is though.

    • Dazeddazza says:

      12:08pm | 23/06/11

      ATM, I do not like Gillard either, and you make a very valid point.  If she planned a Carbon Tax, albeit secretly, she must have prepared a rational argument for its introduction, and one which would convince the public of the benefits.  To still be floundering reeks of incompetence, by her as the leader, and by her advisers.

    • Against the Man says:

      12:22pm | 23/06/11

      Hey TimB, I’m surprised they have started their name calling/insults, would be even more surprised if I got an honest answer or two.

    • Sodapoppy says:

      01:25pm | 23/06/11

      Never mind, Gillard will send us back to the luxurious days of the ‘40s (kerosene lamps, newspaper for toilet rolls, only the rich able to drive a car, street lights turned off at midnight) and Bob Brown and his husband will retire to their strange little island and contemplate the moon. And there’ll be no night footy either! Unless the sun shines at night!

    • melle says:

      01:44pm | 23/06/11

      @Sodapoppy Bob Brown and his husband - sounds so yuck.
      My grandparents had TWO cars in the ‘40s -  but I do remember newspaper and kerosene lamps on the dairy farm.

    • rick says:

      03:45pm | 23/06/11

      Sodapoppy get out of the way old man there’s no room for old farts in this world. You had your chance and stuffed it so take your teeth out have a bex and a lie down leave the cleaning up to the now generation.

    • Coop says:

      03:58pm | 23/06/11

      @ATM. Spelling mate… Its Guiltard, you keep forgetting the U

    • cygnet says:

      05:51pm | 23/06/11

      @rick -  what’s bex?

    • TheRaptured says:

      07:40am | 24/06/11

      When Gillard returned from the US recently she did the backflip and decided we are to have a Carbon tax whether we like it or not. I just wonder when seeing her on tube meeting with US congressmen, wall street bankers, global media owners. Guess what these people all have in common? Global Elite and Bilderberg, Trilateral, Council of Foreign relations members, George Soros etc. I wonder how much she has been paid to sell this country to them, probably cheap!

    • nihonin says:

      09:20am | 23/06/11

      I certainly got the name wrong, apologies to you Joe.

    • Gregg says:

      07:19am | 23/06/11

      Yes, happy birthday Joe and may it be all the more happier by your next one rather than the one after another when we have some sanity returned with the return of a Liberal government that could I esxpect be in for a good four or five terms, maybe even six hopefully so in near two decades from now when you ought to be having a good year of life at 49 or whatever, you’ll be able to say:
      ” bloody hell, nothing much has changed since I wrote that shit back in 2011 and weren’t the global warming claims a lot of crockers “

      Do print of your piece Joe and make up your own time capsule, attach floaties if you like.

    • ZSRenn says:

      07:24am | 23/06/11

      Two maybe three terms Joe?

      The LNP election slogan in 2050 will read

      “Remember Julia Gillard!”

    • Sarah says:

      08:09am | 23/06/11

      LMAO - Thats absolutely gold - @ ZSRenn.

      On the overall article however - Joel - awesome read as usual. I’m giggling away into my porridge. Love your stuff.

    • BobM says:

      08:47am | 23/06/11

      Australia won’t be having another female prime minister for a very long time. The experiment failed - Labor picked a dud and unfortunately for any young woman with a bit of potential, Julia has stuffed it for you. Australians have long memories when they feel they have been cheated.

    • Rick says:

      09:05am | 23/06/11

      Says a lot for Phoney Tony .....beaten by a dud

    • Rick says:

      09:05am | 23/06/11

      Says a lot for Phoney Tony .....beaten by a dud

    • dovif says:

      09:48am | 23/06/11

      Rich

      you are still under the Delusion that the ALP won

      Well firstly they lied to get elected, then Gillard promised everything including the Kitchen Sink, so she does not become a punchline for knifing Rudd.

      Bob Brown won the election, Julia just sold her soul and the ALP’s future to Bob Brown

    • James1 says:

      10:36am | 23/06/11

      Wrong dovif.  No one won that election.  The ALP lost, the Coalition lost, and the Australian people lost…

    • dovif says:

      10:54am | 23/06/11

      James1

      Bob Brown won, he increase his party’s vote.

      Forced Gillard on to a carbon tax

      Help Gillard destroy her own image and destroy her/ALP credibility

      Brown is trying to win more primaries from the ALP

      By helping to detroy the ALP, Brown is expected a primary of 16-18% next time

      The Green definitely won

    • James1 says:

      11:22am | 23/06/11

      I would again disagree.  He may seem to have won, but the increased attention garnered as a result of their position will be the demise of the Greens.  They will (or perhaps have already) go to far and be relegated to political oblivion at the next election.  Be patient my friend.  It will happen.

    • rodney allsworth says:

      11:31am | 23/06/11

      dovif says:09:48am | 23/06/11

      Bob Brown won the election, Julia just sold her soul and the ALP’s future to Bob Brown.—WHAT SOUL—.
      NONE OF THIS GREEN CONTROLLED COALITION HAS A SOUL.

      rod   qld

    • Rick says:

      01:16pm | 23/06/11

      Dovif, Your the delusional one mate when last I looked Julia was PM, the labor party were running the country the loser liberals are residing in the political backwaters.Beaten by a dud.

    • DY says:

      01:42pm | 23/06/11

      dovif is the LNP in power? No so the ALP won. Like it or hate it they still won

    • Dan says:

      02:03pm | 23/06/11

      @ rick -

      you talk of the libs as losers… have you heard the quote “sometimes when you win you lose” or more historically a pyrrhic victory?

      Was 3 years of Gillard worth 25 years of Liberal/coalition rule without effective opposition? Don’t blow a brain cell trying to work that one out.

    • Bev says:

      02:27pm | 23/06/11

      James1 says:11:22am | 23/06/11
      The power of the greens in the senate may be diluted at the next election but it will not evaporate since senators get 6 years.  That is unless we have a double disolution.  At the moment that is unlikely but I won’t be holding my breath.

    • Rick says:

      02:40pm | 23/06/11

      Dan 25 years of LNP…..in your wildest dreams mate.Now go off into the corner and lick your political scabs.Come back in 2 years and well see who leads your LNP in their 25 year rein.Dreamer.

    • Dan says:

      03:17pm | 23/06/11

      @ Rick - I don’t vote for them, I used to vote for Labor. Right now I don’t see a federal party that deserves a vote.

      If you don’t think that this government has permanently damaged the Labor party brand then you’re the dreamer.

    • Rick says:

      03:52pm | 23/06/11

      Dan so if you dont vote why bother us with your dribble. Like your opinion matters on this blog somehow….....gets pretty dangerous sitting on the fence or maybe you can vote for the mad hatters party.Bob will need all the help he can get and while your at it take half the LNP voters with you

    • James1 says:

      03:55pm | 23/06/11

      Bev, please don’t ruin my fantasy.

    • Dan says:

      04:17pm | 23/06/11

      @ rick - sorry precious, did I need your permission to post my opinion in response to yours? How about playing the ball instead of the man, or are you out of arguments there?

    • Rick says:

      04:53pm | 23/06/11

      Dan never argue with an idiot . They just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience

    • Dan says:

      02:22pm | 24/06/11

      Thanks for the advice Rick, I won’t argue with you anymore

    • S.L says:

      07:27am | 23/06/11

      Joe I’m a rusted on Labor voter but I think you’re right. Labors biggest problem is the inner city trendoids that run the party now. But Labor will lose the next election,the Libs won’t win it. I will always think Mr Abbott is an incompetent nobody so by the time the next election comes around I hope he’s fallen on his sword and Joe Hockey gets the gig. Can’t see any other potetial in the rest of that lot!

    • C1 says:

      08:25am | 23/06/11

      @S.L,

      From a conservative voter, I am sorry that the state of your party has reached such levels that foundation members like yourself feel that way. Your comment relating to Labor losing the election rather than the Coalition winning it was one that I always thought was strange. I have to admit that I tend to agree with you. In my state (SA) the Opposition are adopting a tactic of near inertia so as not to draw the flak (similar to NSW). I think it comes back to the point that at the State level it is seriously the ‘B’ team that is running on the field. and the Feds should take notice.

    • Bev says:

      09:12am | 23/06/11

      You cannot believe Joe Hockey should lead the Liberals. Do you?

    • Expat Ozzie says:

      10:01am | 23/06/11

      Bev maybe he thinks Joe is labor’s best chance at getting back at the Libs within a decent time period although I think good old Tony will help Labor’s cause in the long run as well. Personally I don’t want any of them to run my country at the moment. Turnbull is about the only one have any respect for as far as the political seen stands at the moment.

    • Rick says:

      01:22pm | 23/06/11

      I cant see any potential at all . Hurrician Harry (Joe Hockey) falls into that catagory as well. With all the wind he can carry.

    • thatmosis says:

      07:29am | 23/06/11

      Cant wait to see the demise of Labor , the Greens and the Independants who are making the lives of the ordinary Australians a misery. Time to kick the lot out for a long time and let us get back on track.

    • remlap says:

      09:23am | 23/06/11

      We were already derailed before they came into power but everyone was wearing blinkers. I can’t see the Liberal Party getting us back on track any more than I can see the current lot doing it.

    • RyaN says:

      10:40am | 23/06/11

      @remlap: well at least you know they have paid off Labors debt in the past, they know how to run a country efficiently without all of this unimaginable waste.

    • Rick says:

      01:46pm | 23/06/11

      thatmosis ....in the mean time can you just crawl off into a corner some where and lick you political wounds. Maybe you can resurface in a couple of years and back the leader of the libs whoever that will be and maybe by then the new leader will have a policy…...at least one.

    • DY says:

      01:46pm | 23/06/11

      RyaN and how did they pay off the debt? By not spending any money on the future of Australia. By cutting a billion dollars off the health budget. By not spending any money on defence but sending us to war with crap gear. Shit they still have jeeps at holdsworthy that are from the late 70s early 80s

    • Dan says:

      02:11pm | 23/06/11

      @RyaN - I’m not a supporter of any political party, but anyone who thinks that Costello was a good treasurer is an idiot. All he did was introduce a new tax - GST, and ride the mining boom. None of that would have been possible without the politically difficult and essential reforms that were introduced by Hawke and Keating - you know, floating the dollar, slashing protectionism, building stronger trading relationships with Asia…etc.

      The Hawke/Keating Government was the last decent government this country ever had. We are now a bunch of dumb bogan voters - typified by the daily telegraph’s people’s forums at places like Rooty Hill RSL. Its partly the result of having a stupid media talking to an apathetic public about stupid topics - like should the first bloke be afforded more respect (who cares).

      Do any of these pathetic poll driven lawyers actually understand the first thing about macroeconomics? If not why should we give them the biggest economic levers in the country?????

    • Adam Diver says:

      02:55pm | 23/06/11

      @ DY,

      I find this argument self-defeating. Are you suggesting that budget cuts should never be made and we have exponential debt growth? Or are you simply arguing about the type of cuts that were made to pay off debt?

      Because if its the first, your argument is stupid.

      If its the latter, than perhaps the ALP would be wise to make the cuts themselves to better serve the Australian Public.

      @ Dan, Costello was a good treasurer, above all he has political parties debating about the size of debt, and the benefits of surplus.

      Thats not to take credit away from the reforms of Hawke/Keating, but its not like Costello had the ability to refloat the dollar, or any of your yardsticks for performance.

    • DY says:

      03:37pm | 23/06/11

      Adam. Why is the first argument stupid? Is that not the truth? The Howard government did not spend money on infrastructure at all. So you think it’s good cutting budgets for hospitals and the Howard government sent troops into war with sub-standard equipment. So you think that’s ok.

    • Dan says:

      04:20pm | 23/06/11

      @ Andy - fair points, it just frustrates me that people give him all the credit for the boom that resulted from the Keating changes.

    • RyaN says:

      04:35pm | 23/06/11

      @Dan: defend them all you like, so why are we in the largest amount of debt now, what happened to the mining boom is it over?

      Facts are facts mate, stupid arguments about not spending etc.. fall straight back into the lap of the people that left the debt in the first place, if they hadn’t wasted all that money in the first place the country wouldn’t have been in debt in the first place. How exactly do you think we are going to pay back this current unsustainable record debt Labor has spent us into with nothing to show for the billions.

    • Damo says:

      12:01am | 24/06/11

      Wilkie got hundreds of millions to keep Hobart hospitals teaching.  Hardly call that a misery for some of the longest waiting lists in Oz.  Time to read newspapers instead of journals.  That’s where the truth lies.

    • Dan says:

      02:34pm | 24/06/11

      @ RyaN - I’m not saying that the current debt is sustainable. I agree this government has no idea. It just annoys me how many people don’t realise the last government had no idea either. The current situation is actually a crisis of our democracy, but we’ll work that out in 30 years or so.

    • RyaN says:

      07:22pm | 24/06/11

      @Damo: has he done anything with that windfall of all of our money that he gained through the use of public funds for personal gain?

    • Super D says:

      07:45am | 23/06/11

      Nice to see that at least one journalist has figured out whats going on.  I’m not sure that Joe’s plain speaking will win him any friends in the chattering classes.

    • Rover of North Cooma says:

      10:04am | 23/06/11

      Yep good work Joe. I was staggered by a conversation I had with an ABC journalist last week who believes that the Greens are showing great principles on climate change. Principles? If they had been prepared to go for incremental change, we would have had an ETS by now instead of a situation where Australians either no longer believe climate change is happening or don’t want to pay to take action.
      The Greens have managed to ruin public support for their main issue. Well done.

    • Luke says:

      02:29pm | 23/06/11

      Agreed, best article of the politics of Climate Change written in ages.  If only the rest of the journo’s could look into it more and report similarly, but they mightn’t want to upset Bob Brown!

    • Rick says:

      03:22pm | 23/06/11

      Good article…..bullshit. The labor party reacts to the poll when Rudd was on the nose and dumped him.Won the election got back in powerThats politics.Lib wankers can bullshit all they like about back stabbing but the fact yes FACT is they are in power and the losing liberals have to eat crow.

    • CJ Morgan says:

      07:50am | 23/06/11

      Yes, if it wasn’t for the dastardly Greens and Gillard we’d have a CPRS, but Joe neglects to mention that the Bill would have still sailed through Parliament had the Opposition supported it.  I think that the Greens blundered strategically in assisting to vote it down, but they’ve obviously learnt from that and have moderated their approach.

      The Opposition, however, are still actively sabotaging any real action on climate change.  Joe is probably right that the Coalition will win the next election, but they’ll have to ditch the odious Abbott first.  Meanwhile, the Green vote will continue to increase steadily and the MSM will continue its paranoid disinformation campaign.

      Not much to celebrate here - oo look, there’s something shiny over there!

    • Bev Shaw says:

      08:51am | 23/06/11

      @CJ Morgan - Pardon my ignorance (this is a genuine question from someone who is trying to get her head around the Australian political landscape) - but can you tell my exactly why Tony Abbott is so “odious”? Judging by the comments that some people make about him here on the Punch, you would think he should be locked away in some dungeon and forgotten about. So CJ Morgan (and others if you can enlighten me), can you please outline why Tony Abbott is such a pariah?

    • Ando says:

      10:10am | 23/06/11

      Bev,
      I reckon their as bad as each other. Abbotts climate change policy is no more appealing than Giilards to those who oppose action. He is pole driven and populist and no better at public speaking.
      The level of negative comment boils down to which way you lean and how far.

    • dovif says:

      10:20am | 23/06/11

      Rev Shaw

      Abbott is beating the ALP to a pulp, the Liberals is on 48% primaries, while the ALP is having trouble with getting over 30%

      Gillard has shown herself to be fake (her words), to be a liar (her words), to be incompetant (by re-writing border protection law, which now requires the Malaysian/PNG/East Timor/Regional/Christmas Island Solution, none of which had been signed to solve the problem caused by Gillard.)

      So the ALP here can’t really talk about their incompetant PM, so the only thing they can offer up is, be afraid. be very afraid, what if Abbott is more incompetant than Gillard

    • CJ Morgan says:

      10:31am | 23/06/11

      Sorry Bev - I don’t buy it.  Trying to get your head around the Australian political landscape?  If you really don’t know why so many Australians have such an aversion to him, try watching any TV news broadcast and count how many times he says “great big new tax on everything”, or simply “no”.

      Even within his own party, the smarter ones think he’s unelectable as PM.  That’s why he’ll be replaced before the next election.

    • Anubis says:

      10:46am | 23/06/11

      @ Bev Shaw - Tony Abbott was, for many years, the Liberal Party rottweiler. He was antagonistic, abusive and some times down right feral. While he has done a reasonable job of masking these traits since assuming the leadership the basic rottweiler is still there. It nearly resurfaced during the famous lawn interview where he was shaking with loathing regarding the the reporter that had asked him an inconvenient question, which, to most people, showed that the underlying attack dog attitude is still there just below the surface. He is also a man who can not be trusted to say what he really thinks and is almost totally devoid of any coherent policy skills. As a PM he has the potential to be almost as disastrous as our current PM.

    • stevem says:

      11:26am | 23/06/11

      I’m not too sure that the Greens have moderated their approach. I think they are negotiating with more strength this time.
      I noted yesterdays comments. Bob Brown stated they were still a very long way from agreement and Labor said an agreement was imminent. My reading of these comments is that the Greens are not willing to compromise but that Labor think they will.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      12:08pm | 23/06/11

      @Bev - they don’t call him the ‘mad monk’ for no reason..

    • Rick says:

      01:34pm | 23/06/11

      Tony Abbot…...He’s a liberal loser,what’s more he lost to a dud. What more do you need to know or if I have to explain you’ll never understand.

    • Bev says:

      03:17pm | 23/06/11

      Anubis says:10:46am | 23/06/11
      (not BevShaw) While I agree with most of what you have said I do believe he has changed.  The hardline feminists (in and out) of parliament have never forgiven him for the opposing the morning after pill and this has formed the basis of a very personnel, nasty and misandric attack on him. He is fighting fire with fire.  I will withhold my judgement for the moment it will depend on whether the LNP manages to come up with some decent policies come election time. It is always difficult for opposition, show your policies too early and if good the Goverment steals them.  If you don’t you get derided for having no policies. He is between a rock and a hard place.

    • Rick says:

      03:59pm | 23/06/11

      Anubis Tony the Lib rotty…..was his bark like..um woof um ah woof um ah woof no?

    • Anubis says:

      04:40pm | 23/06/11

      @ Rick

      Pauline Hanson found out what Tony the Attack Dog was like. (whether she deserved it or not is another argument entirely). But his bark was far more mundane than his bite was.

    • Unionist says:

      07:51am | 23/06/11

      You liberal types the author included are histerical. Here’s a lil advice stop reading into your own made up bullshit as though you have some sort of looking glass into the working (behind the doors) of the current government. and Joe stop smoking the surry hills hydro… actually no don’t stop you get funnier with age.

    • Barry says:

      08:15am | 23/06/11

      Wow you’ve raised such great rebuttals to this article . . . I am impressed.

    • sir ronald bradnam says:

      08:40am | 23/06/11

      @Unionist…..come on own up you are either Tim Matheson in disguise or the ghost of Joseph Chifley.

    • AJ says:

      10:03am | 23/06/11

      Yes I too am impressed unionist. Intelligent advice and witty to boot!

    • NicoleG says:

      10:30am | 23/06/11

      You can change your name Rob R, but the content of your posts remain the same. Pure drivel.

    • Rick says:

      01:42pm | 23/06/11

      well said unionist.The libs cant stand thier own history so they just make it up. Stuff like John howard had a mandate for the GST bullshit.John Howard went to the election with the GST as policy also bullshit.Never never never have I heard so much bullshit from the loser libs.

    • Dan says:

      02:30pm | 23/06/11

      @ Rick - its becoming increasingly clear that the latest polls reviewed by the ALP indicate that referring to the Liberals as losers is a good strategy (yes we notice when you all start saying the same things…again)

      I know you think you’re being clever but you’re not. The sad thing is it used to be the lntellectuals who had jobs like yours - now its just inbred lawyers, protecting the gravy train for their kids. We’re not much better than a monarchy.

    • tommo says:

      02:37pm | 23/06/11

      who the hell is “Joseph Chifley”

    • Rick says:

      02:53pm | 23/06/11

      Not being clever Dan Just stating facts….....The libs lost and you’ve got no idea what my job is wanker.

    • Coop says:

      04:10pm | 23/06/11

      You sound angry Rick. Got sand in your box?

    • Rick says:

      05:01pm | 23/06/11

      Coop who rattled your cage?

    • Macca says:

      08:10am | 23/06/11

      Happy birthday Joe. And you’re all over it. The problems faced by the Greens and particularly the ALP are all of their own-doing.

      Tony Abbott is only a success because of the incompetence of those in power.

    • Rick says:

      01:50pm | 23/06/11

      Tony Abbot a success? well he certainly succeeds at sucking

    • Sarah says:

      08:20am | 23/06/11

      Ahh Unionist - I don’t think that article was particularly biased by Joel towards the Liberals (with favour).

      You’re quite the cranky pants today, aren’t you? Actually, you remind me of an aggressive, less-polished version of Persephone. Not something I’d be too proud of!

      I was a die-hard, hardcore Labour supporter my entire life. I proudly voted for Rudd and very very reluctantly voted for GIllard at the last election (As much as I hated Gillard and the knifing of Rudd - I just could NOT in good conscience, vote for the Mad Monk) and after all these years of unquestioning support (I even voted for bloody Latham for God’s sake) I have now finally kicked the bucket that is my loyalty to the ALP.

      The ALP no longer are run by, nor stand for the old ideals anymore. The party has been taken over by hard-left nutters and entirely self-serving smarmy elitists with no real political positioning (left/right) other than what gets them their power and their big pension at the end of the day.

      They don’t even give a flying fudge-bar about the workers anymore! Have you noticed - its all about taxing the holy hell out of the workers - in order to re-distribute to the poor? So if you really are, what your nickname alludes to - one would think you would be jumping up and down about this government as much as the next person…...

      Your posts this morning to Erick and this one here - show simply what the hell is wrong with the ALP these days. If you can’t even grudgingly admit that the party is under the weather (if nothing else) and all you can do is go on the wild attack - then you’re as big a fool as Gillard, Swan, Combet, Roxon and the rest.

    • JohnB says:

      11:13am | 23/06/11

      Really well said Sarah. Although I can’t say I ever went close to voting for Labor except to ensure that horrendous work-choices was quashed. That is the problem, Labor will be crushed at the next election, leaving an unmitigated Liberal party to punish us in all sorts of ways. We need an election right now so this doesn’t occur. If Labor were smart (there’s the problem) they’d go to the polls and maintain a small handful of seats.

    • Huey says:

      08:30am | 23/06/11

      Thanks Joe, it’s nice to start the day with a chuckle..Dugongs…Special Effects..good stuff.

    • sir ronald bradnam says:

      08:35am | 23/06/11

      Labour is gone no doubt about that and will leave the country with a debt again, its like a groundhog day movie every time they get themselves elected as commisars.
      The crazy monk wont be elected head commandant, I will put money on Turnball becoming leader and elected at the next election.

    • Tubesteak says:

      09:09am | 23/06/11

      * Labor
      * it’s
      * commissar
      * won’t
      * Turnbull

      And while I’m correcting things, it wasn’t Albert Einstein that gave us the definition of insanity. It is misattributed to many people:

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin - see the part about misattributed

    • sir ronald bradnam says:

      09:56am | 23/06/11

      @Tubesteak…Sincerest apologies spelling sensei Lubesteak. The correct spelling for Labour is as I put it not your american version of spelling it.
      Unfortunately no spell check on this and cant be bothered with checking spelling and punctuation.
      Not really a problem when there are tools around like you to correct me.
      The point these rag tag bunch of no hopers who pose as a government are f….. and out of here next election or before, I think you missed the point of the comment whilst micromanaging silly little details.

    • Bomb78 says:

      10:32am | 23/06/11

      SRB: the ALP has been spelling it ‘LABOR’ for a long ime now - like since about 1912.

    • Rover of North Cooma says:

      10:53am | 23/06/11

      @sir ronald - spelling and punctuation are important, not silly little details.

      Poor spelling and no capitals usually mean that the post has been written by a loony troll.

    • sir ronald bradnam says:

      10:54am | 23/06/11

      @Bumb78 ... you also miss the point.
      I suppose as a party and a group of useless zealots they are not worth paying attention to, so I didnt, that one I didnt notice, oh well who gives a sh.. anyway how they spell it.

    • Tubesteak says:

      11:23am | 23/06/11

      Regardless of whether it’s correct spelling, it’s a name. It can be spelled any way you want. It’s why we now see people spell “Jackson” as “Jaxxyn” when naming their children.

      If you can’t even get the spelling right of one of the dominant political parties in this country for the last century then it show that you’re opinion isn’t worthwhile because you lack the intelligence to be able to reach a considered opinion.

      Also, if you’re too lazy to check your grammar and spelling then it indicates that you’re too lazy to come to a considered conclusion. Again, not very good for your credibility.

      Hell, you can’t even get the correct name of one of the main players in the Liberal party.

    • sir ronald bradnam says:

      12:27pm | 23/06/11

      @Lubesteak…you miss the point again you LABOUR placard waving zealot. I’m lazy blah blah blah, dominant political party hahahahaha, pack of useless, self serving, ordinary, intellectual lightweight idiots is more like it.

    • NicoleG says:

      01:05pm | 23/06/11

      Forgive me for feeling like I’ve just stumbled on a freaking spelling test. People who spend their days correcting other peoples spelling on blogs, are wankers who have nothing to add to the debate. Now run along and find something else to pick shit on.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      01:06pm | 23/06/11

      @Tubesteak

      *shows

      Ooo that was fun. raspberry

    • melle says:

      02:42pm | 23/06/11

      @Nicole G They’re not wankers.  They’re trying to put it right for all the recent arrivals to our shores.  It’s a service.  Don’t want newcomers getting confused reading Aussies’ stupid spelling mistakes.

    • Bev says:

      02:47pm | 23/06/11

      NicoleG says:01:05pm | 23/06/11
      Haven’t you noticed the more frenzied posters get the more their spelling deteriorates.  Me I don’t care, its the state of their clacker valve I wonder about.

    • Rick says:

      03:13pm | 23/06/11

      Typical Libs ...around and around and around again(thanks to mary Joe for that one) lets hope they just dissappear up their own arse’s

    • Jem says:

      03:14pm | 23/06/11

      @ Tubesteak

      it’s “your”  not “you’re”

      As in “your opinion isn’t worthwhile because you lack the intelligence to be able to reach a considered opinion”.  You used “you’re”.

      Using your logic, your opinions are also not worthwhile.  Please reconsider being a prat about the typos people make, when you can’t manage the same standard you consider necessary for other people’s opinions to be worthwhile.

    • JohnB says:

      08:46am | 23/06/11

      Something I recently read…......

      “.....and more than 20 mllion Australians to choose from- can someone please tell me how the hell we ended up with what we’ve got- and how the hell we get out of it.”

      How have we ended up with the very worst people running not only the federal government, but all tiers of government. It is a reflection on us, the Australian voters.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:20am | 23/06/11

      Don’t blame me- I voted for the Australian Sex Party last election. Will probably vote for the Stable Population Party next election. Don’t care about the House of Representatives since it is a duopoly between two increasingly inept political parties

    • AnthonyG says:

      09:43am | 23/06/11

      Shane we can blame you as well because voting for the joke party’s has enable Labor and the Greens to rule so if you don’t like what is happening, you helped them get into power

    • JohnB says:

      09:44am | 23/06/11

      I agree Shayne…Best thing we could do for our kids and their kids, is Stable Population Party…The present inept duopoly are leading us to disaster…Spread the word.

    • OchreBunyip says:

      10:09am | 23/06/11

      Until we have better people entering politics we will continue to have the poor calibre of politician frequently complained about on the Punch.

    • dovif says:

      10:28am | 23/06/11

      JohnB

      We voted for a bunch of Unionists, more then 90% of the ALP parliamentary team, was a secretary for a union, or worked for an ex-ALP parliamentary team, or is married to one. There is some that even had done all 3.

      So the ALP draw from a very thin talent pool, with almost no real work experience.

      What do an union do when they want to go on holiday/beat up an employer, they raises union fees or have a special levy. What do the ALP do when they spend too much money and cannot control the budget, they raise taxes and special levies

      The ALP is working off the union playbook. As for whether the ALP had/will ever been able to balance the budget, don’t ask Swann, he would not be able to tell you

    • Rocksteady says:

      01:47pm | 23/06/11

      Shane - The greens go even further than the stable population party.  Then people wonder how they get so many votes?

    • Union for life says:

      01:57pm | 23/06/11

      Go the Unions. I work on the docks and I make a shit load of money. Have great time and dont need to work that hard. Love my union.

    • Rick says:

      03:36pm | 23/06/11

      Dont forget the Mad hatters party…......there goes half the LNP vote at the next election…... .Boodly Bob

    • rb says:

      08:56am | 23/06/11

      H’day Joe
      I think your right about predictions 2 and 3.
      I’m still in denial about the first. Surely Abbott, with those huge ears, will be blown over by the ever increasingly destructive storm events long before that.

    • Hoona says:

      08:57am | 23/06/11

      Keep ‘em scared - the Red’s are coming, Y2K will destroy us, global warming must be addressed, it never ends! The bottom line is this - life goes on…...and none of the big scare campaigns ever eventuate…Sit back, relax, and enjoy life!

    • James1 says:

      10:40am | 23/06/11

      Just wait until global warming hooks up with the Muslims - Islamic global warming is the next mega-threat.

    • Erick says:

      02:23pm | 23/06/11

      You’re behind the times, James1. I think it was about two years ago that Osama bin Laden declared global warming an enemy of Islam.

    • James1 says:

      04:08pm | 23/06/11

      I guess a jihad on global warming is in order then.  Perhaps they could suicide bomb some carbon emissions?

    • Suzi says:

      08:59am | 23/06/11

      I was talking with my neighbor yesterday and we said the same thing ! I don’t remember you being in the room! You must be the voice of the people !

      Well Love Joe, I could not have said it better! Joe for PM !

    • fifi says:

      09:13am | 23/06/11

      Brilliant, and happy birthday, my birthday too!

    • Elphaba says:

      09:17am | 23/06/11

      Great article Joe - summarises it beautifully.  The only people Labor and the Greens have to blame for their woeful position is… Labor and the Greens.

      Sucks to be them!!

    • DY says:

      02:41pm | 23/06/11

      Elphaba your party won the election but are still in opposition. .

      Sucks to be you. TWAT

    • DY says:

      02:41pm | 23/06/11

      Elphaba your party won the election but are still in opposition. .

      Sucks to be you. TWAT

    • Que says:

      05:20pm | 23/06/11

      @DY I gotta say being in opposition and watching Labor/Greens self implode and doing years of damage to their own standing is worth the price of admission.

      There is not enough popcorn for this.

    • PC says:

      12:27pm | 24/06/11

      @ Que: Well said. 

      Watching the Labor / Greens marriage debarcle is the funniest thing I’ve seen this century.  I’m almost embarrassed for them.

      Watching them skulk off into political oblivion after the next election will be priceless.

    • Jack Richards says:

      09:18am | 23/06/11

      Kevin Rudd was knifed because he was a pedantic little arsehole and had become a huge blockage in the bowels of government. He treated his colleagues with barely veiled contempt and overmanaged everything from national policy to how often the pollies could get a new pen from the stores cupboard. He also treated the Secretaries of all the Departments as if they were naive and naughty school children - having them hang around his office for hours one end waiting for pearls of wisdom to drip from his dag-sucking lips.

      On top of that, he was a shameless publicity hound - never missing an opportunity to shove his smarmy little face in front of a camera, being seen regularly going to Church where, no doubt, he gave Christ some good advice on running the universe, and forever talking to the genertal public in that likeable, quiet, reasonable and patronising way that got so far up my nose that all I wanted to do was grab the conceited little deadshit by the throat and punch his smirking face in.

      So I applaud Gillard et al for springing the trapr on him. It must have given her and the others great schadenfreude to see that bedwetting Little Mr Perfect blubbering like a jilted schoolgirl. I loved it and took exquisite delight from seeing him humbled.

      Insofar as the Greens are concerned, they are a collection of every left-overs from all the fringe loony groups from the 60s onwards. There are ex Peking-line and Moscow-line Communists; aged hippies who finally left the failed Jim Cairns inspired communes; feminists who burned their bras and threw away their tampons in the 70s; animal rights activists who want us all to become vegans; spirtualists channeling through crystals; and poofters who want to marry the tradie next door - indeed anyone who can grow a beard, wear sandals on dirty feet, blow some dope and get all dewy eyed with the certainty that they can cure the world’s ills with chanting, meditation, hash-cookies, and sunlight.

      Needless to say, they are all looking for the Great Cause. And now they’ve found it: GLOBAL WARMING. This is the best scam since religion was invented and it gives all these self-appointed saints the chance to save the world and humanity from the evil sins of capitalism and the industrial society. And the best thing about it is that, like religion, no-one really knows and no-one can prove anything either way.

      For every “proof” of global warming there is an equally valid counter argument - but that doesn’t stop the High Priests like that dour old poofter Bob Brown from inscribing the laws on stone tablets and handing them to the likes of Julia Gillard (and Rudd when he was leading us aimlessly in the wilderness).

      I don’t believe any of it. It seems to me that the winters are just as cold as they were 50 years ago. I haven’t noticed that the oceans are any higher. As far as I know, there are no surfing schools or nudists sun worshippers cavorting on the shores of the Arctic Ocean. There are still plenty of polar bears wandering around in Canada and Siberia.

      Like all religions, Global Warming or Anthropogenic Climate Change is a religion based on “faith” and “belief” on an accidental remark made by one climatologist back in the late 1970s. But a latter-day St Paul picked it up and ran with it and has turned it into multi-national business (a la Al Gore), complete with its clergy and inquisitors and droves of faithful fools.

      Really, what is this country coming to, and this world for that matter. The lunatics have taken over the asylum.

    • Babs of Syd says:

      09:55am | 23/06/11

      Jack Richards your comment is Joe’s birthday present.  Well done.

    • Steve says:

      10:11am | 23/06/11

      Ha Ha! That was a good read. Agree with the comparison of GW to religion.

    • Steve says:

      10:28am | 23/06/11

      Your last lines are so saturated with unintentional irony that I want some of what you’re smoking.

    • Steve says:

      10:28am | 23/06/11

      Your last lines are so saturated with unintentional irony that I want some of what you’re smoking.

    • bullwinkle says:

      10:44am | 23/06/11

      Agreed, Jack. Rudd’s plummet in the polls was not driven by the abandonment of the ETS, but rather the voting public waking up to the fact that a megalomaniacal, micro-managing, spendthrift windbag was running, and ruining, the country.

    • Leopard says:

      11:07am | 23/06/11

      Jack Richards -  Would be good to see all this on the front pages of all major newspapers in the country.

    • Jim says:

      11:59am | 23/06/11

      Post of the Year!! Well done.

    • Ben C says:

      02:03pm | 23/06/11

      Can we get Jack a regular gig at the Punch?

    • Arasaka says:

      02:17pm | 23/06/11

      This post deserves a column of its own.

    • Temerarious says:

      02:25pm | 23/06/11

      Post of the decade more like it!

    • Bev says:

      06:17pm | 23/06/11

      Fantastic post. Spot on.

      I do wonder where this one is going when Jill Singer calls for deniers to be placed in a room fullof CO2 or Carbon Monixide and Professor Ross Garnaut is likened to a Nazi by British Lord Monckton while speaking in front of a nazi symbol banner.  Thats getting scary.

    • jack atkins says:

      10:08am | 24/06/11

      post of the micro second i say

    • Anthony G says:

      09:28am | 23/06/11

      We are experiencing climate change. The climate has never been better. The Farmers are laughing at the moment. The dams are full any attempt to change it would be an absolute joke. All Aussies well at least the working Australians should with hold their tax starting from July 1st until we have a government we can trust

    • James1 says:

      10:42am | 23/06/11

      If we did that, the Australian people would be making this government look responsible by comparison.

    • Grover says:

      01:01pm | 23/06/11

      The Farmers are always laughing AnthonyG.
      They get money whether it rains or there is drought.
      Oh to be a farmer.

    • PB says:

      09:38am | 23/06/11

      Very good article. As an Australian who lives overseas, I really do worry about what is going on. My first thought last year was wtf? I’m still thinking it.. Now before everybody jumps down my throat and says what would I know because
      I’m not living there I thought Rudd was doing ok…...but then again maybe you’re right, what would I know.
      Happy Birthdsy…..

    • Bitten says:

      09:41am | 23/06/11

      Happy birthday Joe! In the great battle between political parties and birthday parties, the one with the fairy bread and the lolly bag always wins!

    • Nick says:

      09:49am | 23/06/11

      Well said Jack..my sentiments exactly.

    • Labor less says:

      09:57am | 23/06/11

      At leasr the labor party would be long gone.US scientists are now saying that earth is likely to enter a Mini Ice Age because sun spots on the sun are getting less active resulting in global cooling.Labors carbon tax is just plain bull….,it is a sneaky way to raise taxes to try to balance their incompetent budget from Swan and company.

    • Warren says:

      10:31am | 23/06/11

      Except that the Liberals also have a proposed climate change policy that will funded by the tax payer. I guess that must be bull too…

    • Anubis says:

      10:57am | 23/06/11

      Warren - Yes the Liberal policy is bullshit as well.

    • Grover says:

      12:59pm | 23/06/11

      Abbott proposes to tax Australians an extra 700 dollars so he can give it to the big polluters to fatten their bottom line.
      The real question is what does that really credible Nazi hunter Monckton have to say about climate change? Guess Abbott will be there when he fills us in with his wisdom. Perhaps he’ll out some other Nazi’s he’s uncovered?

    • Harquebus says:

      01:16pm | 23/06/11

      “US scientists are now saying that earth is likely to enter a Mini Ice Age”. They are not saying that, but they are saying this.
      “sun spots on the sun are getting less active”

    • Graham Richards says:

      02:00pm | 23/06/11

      It’s not just a way to raise taxes. It’s a complete plan to control every aspect of our lives.  The commies had control over the people of the USSR because they controlled every aspect of their lives by force.
      Here in Oz government control nearly everything…..all they need is control of the economy thru energy taxes and hey presto everyone of us is a prisoner. We’ll be played like a yo - yo. Taxes will increase on a whim from government by either increasing ‘carbon prices’ or decreasing the permitted emmissions. It’s very strange that the SOCIALIST governments of this world are hell bent on introducing this madness.
      This applies to both political parties. If labour brought the tax in and the Coalition decided to keep that lovely fiscal dictatorial / control we’d still be prisoners.
      JUST REMEMBER THAT NO GOVERNMENT MUST EVER HAVE THAT MUCH CONTROL!!@!!

    • Rick says:

      02:31pm | 23/06/11

      Graham Richards…....They know where you live.

    • Bev says:

      06:34pm | 23/06/11

      Harquebus says:01:16pm | 23/06/11

      ““sun spots on the sun are getting less active”

      They are comparing the reduced activity to the mauder minimum which produced the coldest 70 years of the mini ice age in medieval times. This period had unusually high rainfall/snow and a dramatic increase in the number of storms. Hmmm

    • somewheresouth says:

      10:15am | 23/06/11

      Dear Jack Richards,
      I’m an oceanographic physicist and mechanical engineer. You, sir, are an idiot if you ‘believe’ or ‘disbelieve’ in anthropogenic climate change.

      I note that you state that"Like all religions, Global Warming or Anthropogenic Climate Change is a religion based on “faith” and “belief”./ I don’t believe any of it”.

      Sir, please suspend your “belief” or lack of it - base your conclusions on fact and the scientific method, where overwhelming evidence and careful examination of results-based experiments define your knowledge.

      Unfortunately the climate is changing, no matter what you “believe”. The evidence IS overwhelming. I frequently work with data that can not be falsified, and would not waste my time doing so. The sea level has begun to rise, the weather has become disordered, the coral reefs are already having trouble dealing with an increasing amount of high-water-temperature events.

      Eventually all politicians will have to face reality and come up with policies that cope with Australia’s future and current situation. Either Labour will pull its pants off its head and start acting like a government rather than the meeting of a focus group at a marketing company trying to deal with a product recall, or Malcolm Turnbull will win the next election and hopefully do something to stop our economy getting wrecked as our production cycles go all to hell with the effects of the disordered climate.

      No matter what happens, the world will keep turning. But our current situation is not as cosy and stable as we seem to think.

    • MarvinM says:

      10:41am | 23/06/11

      Well Duh captain obvious!

      The earths climate has never been static, its always in a flux of change. We’ve had Ice ages and warm hot periods and everything else inbetween.

      So while you claim to be observing this data, your ‘faith’ is showing to claim Jack is an idiot for thinking we are responsible for it.

      The basis that oscillation in temperature is Anthropologic is very flimsy.
      So Repeat after me Correlation does not equal causation.

    • Warwick says:

      11:08am | 23/06/11

      @somewheresouth,

      Oceanographic! Ohmigod! Royalty! Divinity!
      Trouble is, mate, your ludicrous posturing has been undermined by the likes of real, top flight scientists, such as Professor Richard Lindzen from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who piss all over your absurd fear mongering.

      What do you think would influence generally calm nerds, like oceanographicists, to become lunatic catastrophists? Well, that’s where the research money is. And secondly, the mad global warming hysteria gives pointy-heads like you the chance to posture as “World Saviours.” Previously only religious prophets, Jesus and Mohammed and Moses, (and Karl Marx) could be treated as world saviours, now third rate underwater nerds can grab a bit of that glory (for what it’s worth.) And of course you are going to thrash around at the fear that the whole beatup is going to be exposed; you’ll lose your “world saviour” status and have to go back to being a nobody with goggles. What a comedown!

    • Jack Richards says:

      11:22am | 23/06/11

      So I’m an idiot am I? So you have all this data at your fingertips and there is no margin for error, no chance that you have drawn an erroneous conclusion, no possibility that a new hypothesis will arise next month disproving the theory to which to cling with all the religious conviction of an islamic suicide bomber?

      Well let me tell you a few things. I am 60 years old and over that period of time I have seen the following “certainties” that could not possibly, at the time, be wrong;

      * Communism was an historical certainty and would take over the world;

      * There was going to be a nuclear war between the USA and the USSR which was an absolute certainty and the whole world would be cast back into the stone age. Plenty of people bought fall-out shelters - probably cellar their wine in them now.

      * UFOs were real and the world was on the brink of being invaded by Martians. President Eisenhower kept the Roswell aliens a secret so as not to panic the unwashed masses;

      * The second coming of Christ was sure to happen and all the Christians would be raptured into Heaven - and this prediction has recurred constantly and even as recently as last month;

      * By the year 2000 there wouldn’t be a drop of oil left in the world and we’d all be getting around in dog carts and travelling OS on sailing ships again;

      * By the Year 2000 the population bomb will have exploded and the whole world would be starving and living on recycled human corpses al la Soylent Green. There’d be a big market for rats and cockroaches;

      * In 1975 when I was doing a Science degree at University, the climatologists were certain that the earth would soon enter a new ice age and all the food producing areas of America, Asia, Australia, Europe etc would be covered by glaciers by now and there’d be mass famine and starvation. Instead of that, we have an obesity epidemic. Luckilly I have been affected and am a slim and atheltic 115kg.

      * By 1990 no Australian child would be living in poverty;

      * At the stroke of midnight on Decmber 31 1999/1 January 2000 the entire world would collapse with the Y2K bug - aircraft would fall from the skies, people would starve to death trapped in lifts, chaos and ruination would sweep the world;

      * By the Year 2000 there’d be no more cars and we’d all have jet back-packs and fly to work;

      * No personal computer would ever need any more than 360kb of memory - as Bill Gates so authoritatively predicted ;

      * In the year 1900 an eminent scientists advised shutting the US patents office as everything that could be invented had been invented;

      * CFC and tetra-ethyl lead were amongst the world’s greatest inventions;

      * Nuclear power was the way of the future and, by 2000, the whole world would run on nuclear energy and every car would have a tiny reactor in the boot and go for a million miles without refuelling;

      * By the Year 2000, medical science will have cured cancer and anti-biotics and anti-virals will have made disease a footnote in human history;

      * Within 50 years of the decolonisation of Africa, the whole continent would be a successful and shining example of democracy and progress;

      I could keep going on with all the false prohpecies of the last 100 years - but it would take a century to relate them all.This Climate Change thing is just as much bullshit as all the rest was.

      Most people are gullible and stupid, highly suggestible and without the most basic ability to think critically. Just think of how many fools there are today wasting productive time praying to their imaginary playmate up in the sky.

      Climate Change is no different - it’s just a new religion frightening little children and fools into wearing tin foil hats and assuming every clap of thunder to be the beginning of the end of the world.

      Incidentally, dickhead, I’ve never been knighted so there’s no need to call me “Sir”. I’ll settle for “Your Holiness” instead. Amen and Allah Akbar!

    • Elphaba says:

      11:32am | 23/06/11

      Bloody hell Jack, that and your other one was a ripping good read.  Thanks for putting a smile on my face. grin

    • C1 says:

      12:13pm | 23/06/11

      @Somehwere South,

      I will not question that your are a qualified oceanographic physicist (and an Engineer - wow), but could you then explain to me that if the water levels were rising at such an alarming rate then why have Al Gore, Kevin Rudd, Cate Blanchett, and one of the guys from U2 have colelctively spent tens of millions of dollars on beachfront property.
      As they say in Politics -perception is everything!!!

      BTW - I bet you pick up lots of chicks with your quals. I used to tell girls that I measured runways!

    • jf says:

      12:54pm | 23/06/11

      “could you then explain to me that if the water levels were rising at such an alarming rate then why have Al Gore, Kevin Rudd, Cate Blanchett, and one of the guys from U2 have colelctively spent tens of millions of dollars on beachfront property.”

      Not to mention our very own minister for climate change, Greg Combet.

    • mike j says:

      01:49pm | 23/06/11

      Jack Richards: which of these ‘certainties’ did your idiot generation think was going to come first? Nuclear war, alien invasion, the Rapture, or the sudden onset ice age?

      By the year 2000, “every car would have a tiny reactor in the boot” but “there’d be no more cars and we’d all have jet back-packs and fly to work”.

      And all of these were deemed ‘certainties’ by popular consensus of the scientific community, in the same vein as climate change today. Wow. People were fucking stupid back then, weren’t they.

    • curious says:

      01:52pm | 23/06/11

      somewhersouth do you add the 3mm to your sea level rises or not. When you quote them. Feel free to tell us what you do with the data.

    • BobM says:

      02:06pm | 23/06/11

      Jack, you’re awesome!  Keep posting!

    • Rick says:

      02:22pm | 23/06/11

      Jack your living proof that age dose not = wisdom

    • ausspud says:

      02:46pm | 23/06/11

      Jack
      you are a champ your holliness

    • Jack Richards says:

      03:26pm | 23/06/11

      @ Mike J

      “Jack Richards: which of these ‘certainties’ did your idiot generation think was going to come first? Nuclear war, alien invasion, the Rapture, or the sudden onset ice age?”

      The “rapture” was high on the list amongst the Protestant Fundamentalists and had been for a long while. The Millerites had predicted it in the 1840s but ballsed up decoding the book of Revelations - and then said it would happen in about 1880. The Jehovah’s Witnesses were sure it would happen in 1917 or 1922. The Catholics didn’t say anything about it because the Virgin Mary had appeared at Garabandal and passed the secret to three devout Spanish children - who would make the announcement at the appropriate time. We’re still waiting and they are still alive.

      By the mid 1950s nearly everyone was convinced that nuclear war would wipe out the world by 1965. And it nearly came true! I can clearly remember the Cuban missile crisis. I think it was Saturday, 21 October 1962, and I was a 12 year old busily digging a fallout shelter in the backyard of our home in a small town in outback NSW. Everyone expected to see mushroom clouds all over the horizon and the Red Army, with snow on their boots, marching down the main street of our town. Thankfully Khrushchev, and the other Russian heavies, didn’t believe in an after life with 72 virgins, and decided that they would prefer to live out their days on this earth. The Yanks thought the war heads were coming on a ship called the “Poltava” and that they could take Cuba out with a massive conventional first strike. It was until 30 years later that they found out that the Russians had about 200 war heads already installed and ready to go. Had the Kennedy brothers not blinked as well ... well we’d all be sitting in caves now glowing in the dark.

      I think it was 1948 when the first flying saucer was spotted. Ever since then, Aliens have been abducting both cowboys on lonely American roads and unattractive women and performing all sorts of weird sexual experiments on them. Of course, it has all come out with “repressed memory” therapy - like all those women molested by their fathers in satanic rituals. And let’s not forget the advanced science of “crop circleology” that proves conclusively that aliens land in paddocks and make circles in wheat and barley crops!

      Now the Ice Age theory really took off in about 1973. In 1975 I went to a seminar at University where a whole gaggle of climate scientists produced charts showing how the world had cooled over the previous 30 years. They could show that the Antarctic ice sheet had grown; how the sea level was falling; the Great Barrier Reef was dying from the colder water and an invasion of starfish that only breed in cool water. This unstoppable cooling would cause droughts, crop failures, famine and war; there would be massive blizzards and storms, outbreaks of disease as the survivors all huddled together in deep caves. Does it sound familiar?

      It’s not just my generation that spawned a multitude of gullible idiots. They’ve been around since recorded history began. The Romans adopted Christianity after all and the Arabs believe that Muhammad could fly up to heaven on a winged horse - and they still do!

      So far as the alien invasion is concerned. I’m pretty sure that’s true. Have you ever noticed what a reptilian arse and legs Julia has? And how about all those other snakes in the ALP and the Greens.

      But the Christians are right about the second coming. Just after Kevin Rudd became PM he was asked if it was true that he was born in a log cabin and chopped down his father’s cherry tree when he was a boy. He chortled of course and said, “No, No, No. It was Abraham Lincoln who was born in a log cabin and George Washington who chopped down his father’s cherry tree. I was born in a manger just outside Jerusa..Brisbane. That day a car pulled up and I was given gold, frankincense and myrrh by Jim Cairns, Gough Whitlam, and Joan Kirner.

      Now, if you want to find idiots as thick as germs on a turd, just walk around any shopping mall in any country of the earth.

    • melle says:

      03:59pm | 23/06/11

      Knew Kevin R grew up in a car -  didn’t know about the manger birth

    • mike j says:

      04:17pm | 23/06/11

      Okay, I’ll pay that. Much better than your earlier effort.

      However, regarding Julia’s legs and arse, I usually try to avoid looking anywhere South of her second chin.

    • Rick says:

      05:06pm | 23/06/11

      Walk around shopping centre’s and what? run into Jack Richards by the way Jack its a blog mate you dont have to write a novel.

    • Jack Richards says:

      06:01pm | 23/06/11

      @Rick

      Now you’ve gone and hurt my feelings. Well you would have if you only knew how to spell and punctuate.

      “Jack your living proof that age dose not = wisdom “

      Which should read:

      “Jack, you’re living proof that age does not = wisdom.”

      “Walk around shopping centre’s and what? run into Jack Richards by the way Jack its a blog mate you dont have to write a novel. “

      Which should read

      “Walk around shopping centres and what: Run into Jack Richards? By the way Jack, it’s a blog, mate! You don’t have to write a novel.”

      Rick, you can’t even write a sentence.

      If I was as stupid as you I’d keep my legs firmly shut - because you surely do talk through your arse and your breath really stinks.

      You’re a real Ddur (that’s Rudd spelt backwards).

      I’ll make a modest and sagacious suggestion to you: go and buy a dictionary, a thesaurus and a book entitled “Living English”. You’ll find them at the shopping mall in thing called a “Book Shop”. You know the Mall, that place where you hang around with all the other idiots, perving up the girls’ dresses while they’re riding the escalator, and wondering what to spend your dole payment on.

      Thanks for giving me something to laugh about, dickhead!

    • Leopard says:

      07:02pm | 23/06/11

      Rick is overwrought.  And it’s all because of Abbott.
      Let me help -

      Tony Abbott will be the next Prime Minister - and there’s nothing, nothing you can do about that, Rick.

    • Bev says:

      07:54pm | 23/06/11

      @Jack Richards
      It has been a pleasure to read your posts. You have said it far more eloquently and forcefully than others (including myself) could have.

    • Editor says:

      08:12pm | 23/06/11

      @Jack Richards…..you are fabulous for two reasons.  You compose incredibly witty and intelligent posts. I love the fact you can spell, write grammatically correct which is such a burden on many posters here and you know your stuff.

      And secondly you put that ignorant idiotic fool Rick in his place.  I say Punch should offer you a column!

    • earthmother says:

      09:11pm | 23/06/11

      Somewheresouth, as someone with an academic background in ecology, and being older than our literary friend Jack, I have also heard it all and I agree with you.  I am more concerned at the findings that state that the oceans are in distress and that foreshadows mass extinction of oceanic species than I am about anything so far read in either climate change camp (Calgary News, BBC news).  No Australian news site has picked up on this very scary scenario.  I also read a major scientific article last week that postulates that we are about to enter a ‘little ice age’ similar to that which saw people building houses on the frozen Thames a few centuries ago.
      Be that as it may, I think that we would be better off if our politicians thought in time spans further than the next election and actually acted like reasonable adults caring for the welfare of the country we elected them to steward on our behalf.  I have yet to be convinced that a Robin Hood Tax will do as much to stop the earth changes as King Canute achieved.  Let’s face it, in a country of droughts and flooding rains, in all these decades they have never developed forward planning for any disasters, let alone events on an earth scale.

    • James says:

      09:47am | 24/06/11

      I cannot believe the arrogance of the sceptics thinking they can offer climate science tips to somewheresouth when he has such an excellent CV. It is a bit like me trying to offer golfing tips to Tiger Woods, it is just bat shit crazy.

    • Rick says:

      01:04pm | 24/06/11

      Go on then editor give Jack a job, He dose a better job than the so called jurno’s and the thing I like about the punch you’ll publish anything , even idiots like me.

    • Steve says:

      10:19am | 23/06/11

      This climate change rubbish is a big distraction from real issues at home that we can ACTUALLY FIX.
      I dont like what Im reading about our farm land being bought by foreign consortiums, I dont like the fact we have no plan for our economy beyond the resources boom and I think we could be heading for GFC round II if Greece defaults, only this time our “credit card” is maxed out. These are the real issues that should be being debated.
      Instead we are talking about a tax that will have no impact on a problem that may or may not exist. This government lost its way and are leading us down a garden path.

    • James1 says:

      10:43am | 23/06/11

      I disagree.  The government has no place either imposing new taxes on us or telling people who they can and can’t sell their land to.  We need to scale back government, not increase its reach.

    • clem says:

      10:24am | 23/06/11

      I’ll never vote Liberal, I can’t bring myself to vote Labor again, I like the idea of the Greens but in practice they’ve got no political nous, so I think I’ll need to vote 1 informal for now on. Lovely weather today, isn’t it?

    • Harquebus says:

      10:25am | 23/06/11

      Political spin is an understatement. Show me the renewable energy.

    • HailTheBus says:

      12:40pm | 23/06/11

      Look to the sky and you shall find what you seek.

    • Christopher Cumulus says:

      01:32pm | 23/06/11

      I see rain clouds

    • James1 says:

      10:34am | 23/06/11

      Happy birthday Joe.

    • Anubis says:

      10:53am | 23/06/11

      The author had toward the end of the article ” the catalyst for the destruction of the Labor Party and the trashing of Australia’s reputation as a mature, stable and progressive nation.” Should this not have read “the catalyst for the destruction of the Labor and Greens parties…”

    • James says:

      11:20am | 23/06/11

      This article puts way too much faith in ‘poor little voters’ who are being done wrong by the big nasty pollies in Canberra, when in fact THEY are the very same nitwits that voted in the likes of Fielding and Abbott. 

      Let’s get real here, the ETS was a feel good policy that locked in failure on climate action.  A 5% cut? give me a break, if that is all Canberra was prepared to do, I would rather they give me the ETS money directly so I could drink myself into oblivion.

      It is clear that the vast majority of people have no real idea of the threat climate change poses to their future, with this sort of delusion there is almost no chance of appropriate action.

    • JimmieG says:

      12:15pm | 23/06/11

      The Sky is Falling The Sky is Falling!!!

    • James says:

      12:44pm | 23/06/11

      Voters like JimmieG for example

    • Richard says:

      10:02pm | 23/06/11

      James, you’ve drunk too much of the Kool-aid buddy. The messiahs of your religion were predicting 10 years ago that we’d already be doomed by now, but we aren’t. They were wrong, dead wrong. This is all on the record James, I’m not making it up. Snow was supposed to be a thing of the past by this now, our dams were supposed to empty by now, the polar ice caps were meant to be melted already, but none of it eventuated.

      Why is the James? I’ll tell you~ its because the apocalyptic models of doom are all based on the presumed existence of runaway positive feedback loops. But there’s actually no hard evidence that nature and the climate is dominated by positive feedback loops. In fact, just from using the “macrocosm in the microcosm” principle and comparing nature to the homeostasis of the human body (which would be consistent with the ‘Gaia’ hypothesis), it seems more likely to me that climate is controlled by negative feedback loops, which would mean that the problem of climate change isn’t as severe as what you think after all.

      But I’m not a climate scientist, and you’re totally indoctrinated, so I expect you’re going to ignore me. But just ponder this James, since all of the climate scientists alarming predictions have proven completely and utterly wrong, are they all really worth listening to either?

    • TheRaptured says:

      08:42am | 24/06/11

      James you are right to a degree about what you say and the bible prophesy does agree also with what you say about climate perplexity and governments in perplexity and global finance system in the last days. The year 1948 is the key year. Christ said that once Israel becomes a nation again after being a non country for 2000 years, not a generation will pass before you see the coming of man(Christ). So yes the same generation that saw Israel become a nation will see Christ return. Christ was defining a generation in our time not his 3 score years and ten. Be sure though this one world finance system will happen, it will be cashless, with one dictator. The key to finance system will be the collapse of the US economy, which will collapse the world economy. Then the BanCor will be implented within days.

    • James says:

      09:33am | 24/06/11

      I take comfort in the fact that people commenting here represent a small, but loud, band of loonies, if not ....Wiskey!

    • Drew says:

      11:49am | 23/06/11

      I detect an undertone of “don’t support Greens or Labor because they killed the ETS” in this article.

      But please remind me of how the Liberals voted in regards to the ETS, Joe?

    • arabit says:

      01:18pm | 23/06/11

      If The Greens had voted for it the deal was done. This concept is not very hard at all to grasp.

    • Asteroidboy says:

      11:52am | 23/06/11

      The most accurate analysis of the events of the past year and forthcoming years seen on The Punch. Give this to Farr as required reading.

    • Doh says:

      12:04pm | 23/06/11

      Love your work Joe, Happy Birthday!

    • Rhino says:

      12:24pm | 23/06/11

      I would rather staple my genitals and my tongue to the table (try imaging that for a second!) that support an Austrlian government lead by Tony Abbott.
      Its not because he is a raving disgusting misogynist.
      Its not because he says shit happens.
      Its not because he is a biggoted catholic altar boy.
      Its not because he looks like a wing-nut.
      Its not becuase he cant see the policy wood for the rhetoric trees.
      Its not becuase he spends too much time with Alan Jones.

      It is because as opposition leader he has not been a remotely effective politician showing any nation leading abilities. No government legislation has been properly analysed, debated or improved. All it has been is no, no, no, oppose, oppose, oppose.

      His negotiation with the independents showed him for what he was. A spoilt brat.

      *pass me the stapler*

    • Grover says:

      12:38pm | 23/06/11

      Blocking and Wrecking is what Abbott is good at.
      He should be working in a wrecking yard at minimum wage and he would be a very happy unit.

      He stands for nothing. He is like a black hole in the political universe. Sucking in and destroying all that comes close. We need more light and positive energy in the Australian political universe and Abbott has nothing to offer.

    • Fred says:

      01:49pm | 23/06/11

      “It is because as opposition leader he has not been a remotely effective politician showing any nation leading abilities. “

      Say hello to my little friend the polls. 59-41 if translated to seats would mean about 112 seats for the coalition and 40 odd for the rest. I would hate to see him be effectual.

      “His negotiation with the independents showed him for what he was. A spoilt brat.”

      And Julia’s showed her true form in negotiation. Utter and humiliating capitulation (see also Malaysia and Mining tax). I bet she is really happy with the “extremist” Greens and Independents. They are really helping her out. Please refer to the first part of this post.

    • Rhino says:

      04:01pm | 23/06/11

      Fred, I said nation leading, I did not say populist. I also said nothing of Ms Gillard, the atheist who follows the bible (because apparently 67% of us are Christian).

      Both are hopeless poll watching marketers who scrounge for the lowest common denominator. I chose the lesser of two weevils, well I don’t even do that, I pick Bob Brown.

      Also, can you explain your maths to me as a ratio of 59:41 doesn’t equal 112:40 odd.

    • Peter says:

      07:51am | 24/06/11

      Rhino, I would happily assist you, but your horn gets in the way!
      Having read your post, I have concluded that your tongue and your genitals support a government led by Tony Abbott. Is that why you want to staple them to the table?
      May I correct a few of your spelling mistakes?
      Where is Austrlia? I can’t find it on Google Maps.
      Lead is the present tense or the element Lead (Pb). The past tense is spelt led
      Bigoted has only one “g”
      I will forgive “becuase”, because it was obviously a typographical error.
      However Tony Abbott’s negotiation with the “Independents” showed he not only has integrity, but also political acumen.
      Having seen the way they have Julia Gillard by the short and curlies, I would say that it showed great vision in not capitulating to their demands.
      Here’s the stapler, do it yourself!

    • AJ says:

      12:24pm | 23/06/11

      Great stuff as always Joe. Happy Birthday!

    • Milly says:

      12:26pm | 23/06/11

      Will be voting liberal next election.
      What other choice is there now!
      Oops that’s right, I might vote ‘Y’ gen style,
      What’s ’ voting’

    • Anubis says:

      01:23pm | 23/06/11

      There’s always the Man in the Hat - BKat’s Australia Party wink

    • ShamWow says:

      04:59pm | 23/06/11

      Gen Y votes mate, it’s the boomers that have adopted the “go with the flow because I can’t change anything” attitude.

    • Jim says:

      12:37pm | 23/06/11

      Good piece Joe, funny with a bit of truth seeping through for flavour.

      Trouble is, though, it is based on a false premise because Rudd, as a politician/PM, was an arse.

    • James1 says:

      03:52pm | 23/06/11

      Perhaps, but I think the central premise wasn’t that Rudd is not an arse, more that he was less of an arse than Ms Gillard.

    • robert Davis says:

      01:10pm | 23/06/11

      Having read what’s printed above I have no idea what the hell you are talking about.

      You blame Gillard for delaying the ETS. Sorry mate but Labor did put it to the Senate 3 times and to continue on that path was ridiculous. Rudd agreed by the way as did Swan. And so do I. There’s no point doing the same thing all the time knowing it will fail.

      Yes, the Greens are responsible, agreed, but not Gillard or Rudd as they tried and had an agreement with the Libs. Until Abbott chose himself ahead of our country.

      Abbott will never be PM. He has no vision other than in the mirror.

    • Rick says:

      03:39pm | 23/06/11

      Spot on Robert once again proff of the Lib’s inventing history.

    • ausspud says:

      02:57pm | 23/06/11

      Happy day of your birth Joe
      And great article but seriously couldnt you have waited for Julia Gillard to put some make-up on before taking the above photo.

    • Ben C says:

      03:01pm | 23/06/11

      Happy birthday Joe!

    • Silver says:

      03:39pm | 23/06/11

      How do you foresee a future Coalition government undoing the Carbon Tax?  The Greens hold the balance of the power in the Senate, and because most of those Senators were elected in 2010, they won’t be going anywhere until 2016, and therefore, the Greens will likely hold the balance of power in the Senate until at least 2016, longer if the Greens vote doesn’t collapse at the 2013 election.

      Do you see Labor voting against their own tax with the Coalition in 2013?  By the time 2016 rolls around, rolling back the tax will be seen as silly as trying to roll back the GST seems now.

      I don’t see how the Carbon Tax will go anywhere if it is passed in this year, and this parliament sees a full term.  A double dissolution of parliament (which is more likely to help the Greens than cripple them) is about the only way to roll back.

    • Matt says:

      04:12pm | 23/06/11

      It’s funny people think they’ll dismantle a tax if it’s instated.. Fair predictions Joe, but number 2 is way off..

    • TheRaptured says:

      08:50am | 24/06/11

      There is no way for the Liberals to stop a Carbon
      Tax system. It will be attached to the one world currency system(BanCor). We are just a blip in the world economy, our economy would collapse overnight.

    • James says:

      09:49am | 24/06/11

      TheRaptured I think it is time for you to have a bit of a lie down.

    • heather Stone says:

      03:58pm | 23/06/11

      Back in the seventies there was a popular button badge “Vote anarchy, vote informal”. Of course nobody did, as it was explained that with no government, we would soon exist under a system of “Warlordism”. Come to think of it, we do anyway, but the weapon is money instead of guns!

    • Ross says:

      04:15pm | 23/06/11

      Nothing wrong with Tony Abbott, he rides a good bike , he has practiced the word no ,and next year or two will be able to spell it with a little help from his new coalition partners the greens. No I think we deserve Tony Abbott.

    • The Liberal Loafer says:

      06:41pm | 23/06/11

      the political world, the business world, the social world and the economic world are already the planets of the apes and the planet of the rapes!

    • The Liberal Loafer says:

      06:43pm | 23/06/11

      is earth the planet of the apes, the planet of the rapes, the planet of the tapes, or the planet of the grapes ?

    • Marcus from China says:

      07:18pm | 23/06/11

      Happy Birthday old mate.
      Keep the fire burning.

    • Editor says:

      08:16pm | 23/06/11

      Happy Bday Joe!  It’s been a long lousy day but reading your article and Jack Richards’ posts brightened it up no end.

      May you guys meet up again. Have a good one Joe.

    • Chris says:

      09:09pm | 23/06/11

      ARBIB! You have a lot to answer for!

    • mike j says:

      09:47pm | 23/06/11

      BTW, great article. Agree with everything, although I wouldn’t write off Turnbull winning the next election. Cheers.

    • Audra Blue says:

      10:29pm | 23/06/11

      As usual Mr Hildebrand, another hilarious piece.  You made laugh when all around me life is falling apart.  I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

    • Johno says:

      10:58pm | 23/06/11

      Happy Birthday Joe. Come 2013 Gillard will be still Prime Minister of Australia, Wacky Wabbot will be replaced well before then, not by Turnbul, he could’nt handle be an opposition leader again. Big Joe will probably apply for a job in the banking sector, with not to much success. That leaves Christopher Pain or July Bishop the next best bet to take the helm as oppostion leader.  Andrew Bolt could be their climate change minister, Piers Akerman as Parlamentary Secretary, Andrew Jones as their Press Secretary.

    • Damo says:

      11:52pm | 23/06/11

      You call it an ETS here, but a Carbon Tax everywhere else.  Read Lindsay Tanners book I think…

    • Peter says:

      06:54am | 24/06/11

      Many happy returns for your birthday yesterday, Joe. I was away from the computer all day yesterday, so I didn’t see the article until this morning.
      By the way, that’s a very good photo of Bob Brown at the beginning of the article. Is it a recent one?

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      07:30am | 24/06/11

      Ugly attacks no policy

      Welcome to the Liberal Party of Australia !!!

    • Peter says:

      08:20am | 24/06/11

      @ Drew
      Am I to understand from your post that the Liberal Party has no policy and Ugly (presumably either Julia Gillard, Bob Brown or any one of the “Independents”) attack this lack of policy?

    • con barrington says:

      07:53am | 24/06/11

      Technically and officially, the Solstice is now at an end. The Sun is journeying back along the horizon, rising and setting in a slightly different place each day.

      You missed it. Don’t worry. There’s a Full Moon coming up

    • ILR says:

      09:47am | 24/06/11

      Happy birthday Joe.  It happened to be mine as well.

      Finally.  I’m sharing a birthday with a celebrity (of sorts).

    • Gail says:

      10:31am | 24/06/11

      These greenimals wouldn’t know what is happening today never mind what could happen in the future,but we can be certain that labor won’t be around.

    • Robert says:

      10:36am | 24/06/11

      Dear Mister Joe,

      Rather than wasting everybodies time with useless and meaningless, pointless and try-hard satire I would ask you, no I beg you to use your talent for ranting in an other - perhaps more meaningfull way!

      Instead of trolling internets with made up shit about nothing - which some of your fans consider to be avant-garde, yet I consider to be as usefull as 1ply toilet paper, why not write about true events? Why not cover important things? It’s not like there is nothing happening out there other than gossip.

      Instead of appearing on any random talk show and morning show you can get tickets for, why not spend the time on real journalism?

      Instead of feeding your troll fans why not investigate real happenings and stir your industry back to integrity? Australians do not need more Limited News by News Limited, they need to know the real stories behing the NBN/Filter and NBN/Privatisation as well as Mining Tax and Cigarette laws. Please stop wasting your talent and energy on try hard comedy stuff. I dare you to be a real journalist for one single week.

    • Tony says:

      04:39pm | 24/06/11

      All true, except we will still have a great climate, and all the warmist chicken littles who say the sky is falling will be eating crow, except for Al Gore and buddies who are making a gazillion out of globalwarming nonsense laws which they are setting up new companies for. Its the new frontier industry. And those who need a cause are sucked right in, believing government propagandist Ross (the New Guinea polluter) Garnaut instead of scientists who ridicule the notion. The Chile volcano is spouting 1000 times more emissions than we are!

    • JamesJohnsonCHR says:

      07:54pm | 24/06/11

      Congratulations Joe. Not just for your birthday (no wonder you were on top of your game on Thursday morning’s Today program), but for another top notch, intelligent and humours political satire. 

      Again you display a very keen intellect, made all the more keener for your witty delivery. 

      I believe that the cat is out of the bag that Australia is not and never has been a mature or a stable or a progressive society. Quite the opposite in fact, right back to January 1901 (federation) and 1788 (first arrival of the Britishers), and at every relevant point of history in between.

      BBC, Wall Street Journal, The Economist have been telling us our place - just in case we need foreign invalidation of our denials and delusions and the diagnosis from a fee insightful Aussies like you, Andrew Bolt, Miranda Devine and a raft of Aussie Bloggers, including me don’t cut deep enough.

      James Johnson
      Independent Federal Canndidate for Lalor
      http://JamesJohnsonCHR.wordpress.com

    • 'Utoikamanu, SMT. says:

      09:31pm | 26/06/11

      AAA+++ for you Joe on a good piece.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter